Who said what: Subject positions, rhetorical strategies and good faith

The first part of this paper briefly sketches out the idea of subject position by advancing two general types of subject position, showing how they differ and overlap. The second part discusses subject position as it is employed in argumentation, and specifically how it is used as a rhetorical trope...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCommunication studies Vol. 54; no. 4; pp. 403 - 419
Main Authors Anton, Corey, Peterson, Valerie V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published West Lafayette Taylor & Francis Group 01.12.2003
Central States Communication Association
Central States Speech Association
Subjects
Argumentation
Audience Analysis
Communication
Critical Theory
Females
Feminism
Interpersonal Communication
Language
Persuasive Discourse
Public speaking
Rhetorical Theory
Self Actualization
Sentence structure
Speech
Teaching Methods
New York
United States > US
Chicago Illinois
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The first part of this paper briefly sketches out the idea of subject position by advancing two general types of subject position, showing how they differ and overlap. The second part discusses subject position as it is employed in argumentation, and specifically how it is used as a rhetorical trope to claim or disclaim legitimacy. The third part offers the concept of "good faith"; to address how future research/theory along these lines may provide useful contributions to rhetorical theory and practice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1051-0974
1745-1035
DOI:10.1080/10510970309363300