Between Two Rocks and in a Hard Place: Reflecting on the Biomechanical Basis of Shoulder Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders

• Published in: Human factors Vol. 65; no. 5; pp. 879 - 890
• Main Authors: Dickerson, Clark R., McDonald, Alison C., Chopp-Hurley, Jaclyn N.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.08.2023; Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
• Subjects: Assessments; Biomechanics; Complexity; Damage; Disorders; Ergonomics; Evaluation; Exposure; Fatigue; Health risks; Injury analysis; Injury prevention; Integrated approach; Job design; Modulators; Muscular fatigue; Musculoskeletal diseases; Occupational exposure; Occupational health; Occupational safety; Prevention; Reviews; Shoulder; biomechanics; workstation design; shoulder; physical ergonomics; biomechanical model
• DOI: 10.1177/0018720819896191
• ISSN: 0018-7208

Objective The aim was to review the biomechanical origins of occupational shoulder damage, while considering the complexity of shoulder mechanics and musculoskeletal consequences of diverse task demands. Background Accessible measures of physical exposures are the primary focus of occupational shoulder assessments and analyses. This approach has led to guidelines and intervention strategies that are often inadequate for mitigating shoulder disorders amongst the complexity of modern workplace demands. Integration of complex shoulder mechanics into occupational assessments, analyses, and interventions is critical for reducing occupational shoulder injury risk. Method This narrative review describes shoulder biomechanics in the context of common injury mechanisms and consequent injuries, with a particular focus on subacromial impingement syndrome. Several modulators of shoulder injury risk are reviewed, including fatigue, overhead work, office ergonomics considerations, and pushing and pulling task configurations. Results Relationships between work requirements, muscular demands, fatigue, and biomechanical tissue loads exist. This review highlights that consideration of specific workplace factors should be integrated with our knowledge of the intricate arrangement and interpersonal variability of the shoulder complex to proactively evaluate occupational shoulder demands and exposures. Conclusion A standard method for evaluating shoulder muscle exposures during workplace tasks does not exist. An integrated approach is critical for improved work design and prevention of shoulder tissue damage and accompanying disability. Application This review is particularly relevant for researchers and practitioners, providing guidance for work design and evaluation for shoulder injury prevention by understanding the importance of the unique and complex mechanics of the shoulder.