The use and reporting of patient-reported outcomes in phase III breast cancer trials
Background Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measu...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical trials (London, England) Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 243 - 249 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, England
SAGE Publications
01.04.2013
Sage Publications Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects.
Purpose
We sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications.
Methods
We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed.gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials.
Results
We found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989–2000) versus 36% (2004–2007) versus 30% (2008–2011) (p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data.
Limitations
Data were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials.
Conclusions
Patient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects. Purpose We sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications. Methods We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed.gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials. Results We found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989–2000) versus 36% (2004–2007) versus 30% (2008–2011) ( p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data. Limitations Data were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials. Conclusions Patient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change. BACKGROUNDPublic and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects.PURPOSEWe sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications.METHODSWe searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed.gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials.RESULTSWe found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989-2000) versus 36% (2004-2007) versus 30% (2008-2011) (p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data.LIMITATIONSData were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials.CONCLUSIONSPatient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change. Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects. We sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed.gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials. We found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989-2000) versus 36% (2004-2007) versus 30% (2008-2011) (p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data. Data were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials. Patient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change. Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects. We sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed.gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials. We found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989-2000) versus 36% (2004-2007) versus 30% (2008-2011) (p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data. Data were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials. Patient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Background Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects. Purpose We sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications. Methods We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed.gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials. Results We found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989–2000) versus 36% (2004–2007) versus 30% (2008–2011) (p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data. Limitations Data were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials. Conclusions Patient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change. |
Author | Brim, Remy L Pearson, Steven D |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Remy L surname: Brim fullname: Brim, Remy L email: remy.brim@nih.gov – sequence: 2 givenname: Steven D surname: Pearson fullname: Pearson, Steven D |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23539108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kEtPwzAQhC1URB9w54QsceES8CO2kyOqeESqxCX3yHE2barWDnZy4N-TklKhSpx2NfpmdjVzNLHOAkK3lDxSqtQTVTFRKhaUx0oIll6g2UGKlBJ8ctpjMUXzELaEsEQk_ApNGRc8pSSZoTzfAO4DYG0r7KF1vmvsGrsat7prwHbRKEKFXd8Zt4eAG4vbjR48WZbh0oMOHTbaGvC4843ehWt0WQ8Dbo5zgfLXl3z5Hq0-3rLl8yoyXIouEjWhtTQspozGggMXTFKeytSQsqorqZiRzGgjY5GWVKU0TphMKGGMEWUSvkAPY2zr3WcPoSv2TTCw22kLrg8F5WxwSUbIgN6foVvXezs890OlTKRCDhQZKeNdCB7qovXNXvuvgpLiUHhxXvhguTsG9-UeqpPht-EBiEYg6DX8ufpf4De2OYae |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_24436 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cct_2015_04_004 crossref_primary_10_2196_cancer_6996 crossref_primary_10_3892_mmr_2014_2659 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1470_2045_14_70380_8 crossref_primary_10_1080_23809000_2016_1174068 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers9060059 crossref_primary_10_1097_HRP_0000000000000010 crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_32730 crossref_primary_10_4137_BCBCR_S39385 |
Cites_doi | 10.1001/jama.297.19.2112 10.1093/jnci/95.4.263 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3845 10.1093/jnci/djq508 10.1001/jama.2012.3424 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.07.002 10.1016/j.soncn.2009.11.009 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012 10.1056/NEJMp0911494 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3324 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2341 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0197 10.1186/1477-7525-5-24 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4784 10.1186/1756-9966-27-32 10.1007/s11136-004-0705-2 10.1093/annonc/mdm121 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4644 10.1056/NEJMe068291 10.1007/s11136-011-9999-z 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70910-X 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0172 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.5329 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s), 2013 SAGE Publications © Apr 2013 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s), 2013 – notice: SAGE Publications © Apr 2013 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7RV 7TK 7TS 7U7 7X7 7XB 88E 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AFKRA AN0 AZQEC BENPR C1K CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH K9. KB0 M0S M1P M2O MBDVC NAPCQ PADUT PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1177/1740774513475529 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database Neurosciences Abstracts Physical Education Index Toxicology Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Public Health Database (Proquest) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central British Nursing Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student Research Library Prep ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Research Library Research Library (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Premium Research Library China ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central China Physical Education Index Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Research Library Research Library China ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Public Health ProQuest Central Basic Toxicology Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition British Nursing Index with Full Text ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Research Library Prep |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1740-7753 |
EndPage | 249 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2932301351 10_1177_1740774513475529 23539108 10.1177_1740774513475529 |
Genre | Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Intramural NIH HHS |
GroupedDBID | --- -MK -TM .2E .2J .2N 01A 04C 0R~ 1~K 29B 31R 31U 31X 31Z 36B 3V. 4.4 53G 54M 5GY 5RE 5VS 6PF 7RV 7X7 88E 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8R4 8R5 AABMB AACMV AACTG AADTT AADUE AAEWN AAGMC AAJPV AAKGS AAQDB AARDL AARIX AATAA AATBZ AAUAS AAWTL ABAWP ABCCA ABEIX ABFWQ ABHQH ABJIS ABKRH ABLUO ABPNF ABQXT ABRHV ABTDE ABUWG ABVFX ACARO ACDSZ ACDXX ACFEJ ACGFS ACGZU ACJTF ACLFY ACLZU ACOFE ACOXC ACPRK ACROE ACSBE ACSIQ ACTQU ACUAV ACUIR ACXKE ACXMB ADBBV ADRRZ ADZZY AECGH AEDTQ AEIJN AEKYL AENEX AEPTA AEQLS AERKM AESZF AEUHG AEUIJ AEWDL AEWHI AEXNY AFEET AFKRA AFKRG AFMOU AFQAA AFRAH AFUIA AGKLV AGNHF AGWFA AHHFK AHMBA AIIQI AIOMO AJUZI AJXAJ ALIPV ALJHS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALTZF AMCVQ AN0 ANDLU ARTOV ASPBG AUTPY AUVAJ AVWKF AYAKG AZFZN AZQEC B3H B8M B8R B8Z B94 BBRGL BDDNI BENPR BKEYQ BKIIM BKSCU BMSDO BNQBC BPACV BPHCQ BSEHC BVXVI BWJAD CAG CCPQU CDWPY CFDXU COF CS3 DB0 DC- DC. DF0 DO- DOPDO DU5 DV7 DV9 DWQXO EBD EBS EIHBH EJD EMB EMOBN EX3 F5P FEDTE FHBDP FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION GUQSH HF~ HMCUK HVGLF HZ~ J8X JCYGO K.F M1P M2O M4V N9A NAPCQ O9- P.B P2P PADUT PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X Q7L Q7U Q83 ROL S01 SCNPE SDB SFC SFK SFT SGO SGR SGV SGZ SHG SNB SPJ SPQ SPV STM SV3 UDS UKHRP WOW YHZ ZGI ZONMY ZPPRI ZRKOI ZSSAH ACJER AGWNL ALKWR CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF H13 NPM AAYXX ADVBO CITATION 7TK 7TS 7U7 7XB 8FK C1K K9. MBDVC PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-5f01f6c24121453e352613969c0bdfd672c62cac6459b1791482681022207c83 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1740-7745 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 00:50:41 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 22:11:59 EDT 2024 Mon Nov 04 10:08:59 EST 2024 Tue Oct 15 23:44:43 EDT 2024 Tue Jul 16 20:37:33 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c365t-5f01f6c24121453e352613969c0bdfd672c62cac6459b1791482681022207c83 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 23539108 |
PQID | 1321925956 |
PQPubID | 40366 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1321796200 proquest_journals_1321925956 crossref_primary_10_1177_1740774513475529 pubmed_primary_23539108 sage_journals_10_1177_1740774513475529 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20130400 2013-Apr 2013-04-00 20130401 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 4 year: 2013 text: 20130400 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | London, England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London, England – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Clinical trials (London, England) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Trials |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications Sage Publications Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: SAGE Publications – name: Sage Publications Ltd |
References | Cella, Riley, Stone 2006; 63 Ganz, Gotay 2007; 25 Law, Kawasumi, Morgan 2011; 30 Gondek, Sagnier, Gilchrist, Woolley 2007; 25 Adamowicz, Jassem, Katz, Saad 2011; 38 Revicki, Hays, Cella 2008; 61 Lemieux, Goodwin, Bordeleau, Lauzier, Théberge 2011; 103 Garcia, Cella, Clauser 2007; 25 Gershon, Rothrock, Hanrahan, Bass, Cella 2010; 11 Lipscomb, Reeve, Clauser 2007; 25 Moinpour, Denicoff, Bruner 2007; 25 Basch, Iasonos, McDonough 2006; 7 Zarin, Ide, Tse 2007; 297 Basch 2010; 362 O’Mara, Denicoff 2010; 26 Califf, Zarin, Kramer 2012; 307 Montazeri 2008; 27 Moinpour, Donaldson, Liepa, Sloan 2011; 21 Bren 2006; 40 Trotti, Colevas, Setser, Basch 2007; 25 Drazen, Zarin 2007; 356 Wyrwich, Bullinger, Aaronson 2005; 14 Perry, Kowalski, Chang 2007; 5 Bruner, Bryan, Aaronson 2007; 25 Joly, Vardy, Pintilie, Tannock 2007; 18 Goodwin, Black, Bordeleau, Ganz 2003; 95 bibr13-1740774513475529 bibr18-1740774513475529 bibr9-1740774513475529 bibr30-1740774513475529 Institute of Medicine Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization (bibr1-1740774513475529) 2009 bibr21-1740774513475529 Moinpour CM (bibr26-1740774513475529) 2011; 21 bibr19-1740774513475529 bibr3-1740774513475529 bibr20-1740774513475529 bibr33-1740774513475529 bibr12-1740774513475529 Basch E (bibr8-1740774513475529) 2011 bibr16-1740774513475529 bibr6-1740774513475529 Bren L (bibr25-1740774513475529) 2006; 40 bibr28-1740774513475529 bibr11-1740774513475529 bibr2-1740774513475529 Gershon RC (bibr24-1740774513475529) 2010; 11 bibr32-1740774513475529 bibr15-1740774513475529 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (bibr7-1740774513475529) 2009 Mullins C (bibr5-1740774513475529) 2010 bibr23-1740774513475529 bibr29-1740774513475529 bibr10-1740774513475529 bibr27-1740774513475529 bibr31-1740774513475529 bibr14-1740774513475529 bibr17-1740774513475529 bibr4-1740774513475529 bibr22-1740774513475529 |
References_xml | – volume: 21 start-page: 765 year: 2011 end-page: 75 article-title: Evaluating health-related quality-of-life therapeutic effectiveness in a clinical trial with extensive nonignorable missing data and heterogeneous response: Results from a phase III randomized trial of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer publication-title: Qual Life Res contributor: fullname: Sloan – volume: 25 start-page: 5121 year: 2007 end-page: 27 article-title: Patient-reported outcomes and the evolution of adverse event reporting in oncology publication-title: J Clin Oncol contributor: fullname: Basch – volume: 27 start-page: 32 year: 2008 article-title: Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: A bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007 publication-title: J Exp Clin Cancer Res contributor: fullname: Montazeri – volume: 5 start-page: 24 year: 2007 article-title: Quality of life assessment in women with breast cancer: Benefits, acceptability and utilization publication-title: Health Qual Life Outcomes contributor: fullname: Chang – volume: 63 start-page: 1179 year: 2006 end-page: 94 article-title: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008 publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol contributor: fullname: Stone – volume: 95 start-page: 263 year: 2003 end-page: 81 article-title: Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer – taking stock publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst contributor: fullname: Ganz – volume: 61 start-page: 102 year: 2008 end-page: 09 article-title: Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol contributor: fullname: Cella – volume: 30 start-page: 2338 year: 2011 end-page: 45 article-title: Despite law, fewer than one in eight completed studies of drugs and biologics are reported on time on ClinicalTrials.gov publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood) contributor: fullname: Morgan – volume: 25 start-page: 5051 year: 2007 end-page: 57 article-title: Issues andchallenges with integrating patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials supported by the National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trials networks publication-title: J Clin Oncol contributor: fullname: Aaronson – volume: 103 start-page: 178 year: 2011 end-page: 231 article-title: Quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer: An updated systematic review (2001–2009) publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst contributor: fullname: Théberge – volume: 297 start-page: 2112 year: 2007 end-page: 20 article-title: Issues in the registration of clinical trials publication-title: JAMA contributor: fullname: Tse – volume: 25 start-page: 5106 year: 2007 end-page: 12 article-title: Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: A patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative publication-title: J Clin Oncol contributor: fullname: Clauser – volume: 40 start-page: 27 year: 2006 end-page: 32 article-title: The importance of patient-reported outcomes … it’s all about the patients publication-title: FDA Consum contributor: fullname: Bren – volume: 38 start-page: 554 year: 2011 end-page: 58 article-title: Assessment of quality of life in advanced breast cancer. An overview of randomized phase III trials publication-title: Cancer Treat Rev contributor: fullname: Saad – volume: 25 start-page: 5063 year: 2007 end-page: 69 article-title: Use of patient-reported outcomes in phase III cancer treatment trials: Lessons learned and future directions publication-title: J Clin Oncol contributor: fullname: Gotay – volume: 18 start-page: 1935 year: 2007 end-page: 42 article-title: Quality of life and/or symptom control in randomized clinical trials for patients with advanced cancer publication-title: Ann Oncol contributor: fullname: Tannock – volume: 11 start-page: 304 year: 2010 end-page: 14 article-title: The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research publication-title: J Appl Meas contributor: fullname: Cella – volume: 307 start-page: 1838 year: 2012 end-page: 47 article-title: Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007–2010 publication-title: JAMA contributor: fullname: Kramer – volume: 14 start-page: 285 year: 2005 end-page: 95 article-title: Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes publication-title: Qual Life Res contributor: fullname: Aaronson – volume: 25 start-page: 5087 year: 2007 end-page: 93 article-title: Current status of patient-reported outcomes in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials and product labels publication-title: J Clin Oncol contributor: fullname: Woolley – volume: 7 start-page: 903 year: 2006 end-page: 09 article-title: Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: Results of a questionnaire-based study publication-title: Lancet Oncol contributor: fullname: McDonough – volume: 362 start-page: 865 year: 2010 end-page: 69 article-title: The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting publication-title: N Engl J Med contributor: fullname: Basch – volume: 25 start-page: 5133 year: 2007 end-page: 40 article-title: Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: Taking stock, moving forward publication-title: J Clin Oncol contributor: fullname: Clauser – volume: 25 start-page: 5100 year: 2007 end-page: 05 article-title: Funding patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials publication-title: J Clin Oncol contributor: fullname: Bruner – volume: 356 start-page: 184 year: 2007 end-page: 85 article-title: Salvation by registration publication-title: N Engl J Med contributor: fullname: Zarin – volume: 26 start-page: 68 year: 2010 end-page: 78 article-title: Health related quality of life in NCI-sponsored cancer treatment trials publication-title: Semin Oncol Nurs contributor: fullname: Denicoff – ident: bibr31-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1001/jama.297.19.2112 – ident: bibr10-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.4.263 – ident: bibr13-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3845 – ident: bibr11-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq508 – ident: bibr32-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3424 – ident: bibr3-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.07.002 – ident: bibr14-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2009.11.009 – ident: bibr27-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012 – ident: bibr19-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0911494 – ident: bibr15-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3324 – ident: bibr22-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2341 – ident: bibr29-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0197 – ident: bibr16-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-24 – ident: bibr21-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4784 – ident: bibr12-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-27-32 – ident: bibr28-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0705-2 – ident: bibr4-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm121 – ident: bibr6-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4644 – ident: bibr33-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1056/NEJMe068291 – volume: 21 start-page: 765 year: 2011 ident: bibr26-1740774513475529 publication-title: Qual Life Res doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9999-z contributor: fullname: Moinpour CM – volume: 40 start-page: 27 year: 2006 ident: bibr25-1740774513475529 publication-title: FDA Consum contributor: fullname: Bren L – volume-title: Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims Food and Drug Administration year: 2009 ident: bibr7-1740774513475529 contributor: fullname: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health – ident: bibr20-1740774513475529 – volume-title: Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research year: 2009 ident: bibr1-1740774513475529 contributor: fullname: Institute of Medicine Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization – volume: 11 start-page: 304 year: 2010 ident: bibr24-1740774513475529 publication-title: J Appl Meas contributor: fullname: Gershon RC – volume-title: Recommendations for Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes into the Design of Clinical Trials in Adult Oncology year: 2011 ident: bibr8-1740774513475529 contributor: fullname: Basch E – ident: bibr18-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70910-X – ident: bibr9-1740774513475529 – ident: bibr23-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 – ident: bibr30-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0172 – ident: bibr2-1740774513475529 – volume-title: Effectiveness Guidance Document: Proposed Recommendations for Designing Clinical Trials for ‘New Indications’ of Approved Oncology Drugs for Treatment of Late Stage Disease year: 2010 ident: bibr5-1740774513475529 contributor: fullname: Mullins C – ident: bibr17-1740774513475529 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.5329 |
SSID | ssj0028583 |
Score | 2.078825 |
Snippet | Background
Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered... Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes... Background Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered... BACKGROUNDPublic and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed sage |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 243 |
SubjectTerms | Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - therapy Clinical trials Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic - methods Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic - statistics & numerical data Data Collection - methods Data Collection - statistics & numerical data Design of experiments Drug Industry - methods Female Humans Neoplasm Staging Patient-Centered Care - organization & administration Research Design Research methodology Self Report |
Title | The use and reporting of patient-reported outcomes in phase III breast cancer trials |
URI | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1740774513475529 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23539108 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1321925956 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1321796200 |
Volume | 10 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LS8QwEB58gHgR39YXEUTwEOwrafYkKoorKCIr7G1p0hS9tKvt_n9n0qzrA730kJY2nUky32Qm3wAcGzrMKCPNlUlznuay4MSqxjNZRpnUQpdO0_cP8vY5vRuKod9wa3xa5XRNdAt1URvaIz9DrwnBiEA4fz5-41Q1iqKrvoTGPCxGcSgppSsbzhwuJRwNJ4LuEFFkKmZhyjNqoyY6SSmEA5hfzNIvrPktz8uZnptVWPGYkV10Sl6DOVutw9K9j4pvwAB1zSaNZXlVsC4IgAaJ1SXzrKm8a7QFqyct_q5t2GvFxi9owVi_32eaMtNbZmgEvDNXyKPZhMHN9eDqlvtqCdwkUrRclGFUSoMWmcjHE0vE9wjvZM-EuigLmcVGxiY3xB6jiZQ0Rc9COYcvzIxKtmChqiu7AyxEjJCT6xhalWphe0prXSYKkV9oSpsHcDqV1WjccWKMIk8b_lOuAexPhTnys6MZzXQZwNHnbRzXFKzIK1tPumeynsRJHMB2p4TPj8WJSBDmqABOSCtfXvxHL3b_78UeLMeuygUl5OzDQvs-sQeINVp96AYUXtVVdAiLl9cPj08f8hTMRQ |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,12068,12235,21400,27936,27937,31731,31732,33278,33279,33756,33757,43322,43591,43817 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3dS8MwED_UgfoifludGkEEH4Ld2qTdk6gom25DZMLeSpOm6Es7bff_e9dm8wt9TUua3iW53-UuvwM41XSZUbYUD7Ufcz-WCSdWNR7ItBVIJVRaaXowlN1n_34sxvbArbBplbM9sdqok1zTGfkFek0IRgTC-cvJG6eqURRdtSU0FqFBVFXofDWub4ePT3OXKxQVESfCbhdxpC8-A5UX1EZNdJdSiApifjFMv9Dmt0yvyvjcrcOaRY3sqlbzBiyYbBOWBzYuvgUj1DabFobFWcLqMACaJJanzPKm8rrRJCyflvjDpmCvGZu8oA1jvV6PKcpNL5mmOfDOqlIexTaM7m5HN11u6yVw7UlRcpG6rVRqtMlEP-4Zor5HgCc72lVJmsigrWVbx5r4YxTRkvroW4SVy-cGOvR2YCnLM7MHzEWUEJPz6JrQV8J0QqVU6oWI_VydmtiB85msoknNihG1LHH4T7k60JwJM7Lro4g-tenAyfwxzmwKV8SZyaf1O0FH4jJ2YLdWwvxjbU94CHRCB85IK186_mMU-_-P4hhWuqNBP-r3hg8HsNqual5Qek4Tlsr3qTlE5FGqIzu9PgAOfc40 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+use+and+reporting+of+patient-reported+outcomes+in+phase+III+breast+cancer+trials&rft.jtitle=Clinical+trials+%28London%2C+England%29&rft.au=Brim%2C+Remy+L&rft.au=Pearson%2C+Steven+D&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.issn=1740-7745&rft.eissn=1740-7753&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=249&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F1740774513475529&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1177_1740774513475529 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1740-7745&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1740-7745&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1740-7745&client=summon |