The use and reporting of patient-reported outcomes in phase III breast cancer trials

Background Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical trials (London, England) Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 243 - 249
Main Authors Brim, Remy L, Pearson, Steven D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.04.2013
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects. Purpose We sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications. Methods We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed.gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials. Results We found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989–2000) versus 36% (2004–2007) versus 30% (2008–2011) (p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data. Limitations Data were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials. Conclusions Patient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change.
AbstractList Background Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects. Purpose We sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications. Methods We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed.gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials. Results We found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989–2000) versus 36% (2004–2007) versus 30% (2008–2011) ( p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data. Limitations Data were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials. Conclusions Patient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change.
BACKGROUNDPublic and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects.PURPOSEWe sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications.METHODSWe searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed.gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials.RESULTSWe found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989-2000) versus 36% (2004-2007) versus 30% (2008-2011) (p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data.LIMITATIONSData were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials.CONCLUSIONSPatient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change.
Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects. We sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed.gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials. We found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989-2000) versus 36% (2004-2007) versus 30% (2008-2011) (p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data. Data were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials. Patient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change.
Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects. We sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed.gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials. We found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989-2000) versus 36% (2004-2007) versus 30% (2008-2011) (p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data. Data were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials. Patient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Background Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects. Purpose We sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications. Methods We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed.gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials. Results We found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989–2000) versus 36% (2004–2007) versus 30% (2008–2011) (p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data. Limitations Data were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials. Conclusions Patient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change.
Author Brim, Remy L
Pearson, Steven D
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Remy L
  surname: Brim
  fullname: Brim, Remy L
  email: remy.brim@nih.gov
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Steven D
  surname: Pearson
  fullname: Pearson, Steven D
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23539108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kEtPwzAQhC1URB9w54QsceES8CO2kyOqeESqxCX3yHE2barWDnZy4N-TklKhSpx2NfpmdjVzNLHOAkK3lDxSqtQTVTFRKhaUx0oIll6g2UGKlBJ8ctpjMUXzELaEsEQk_ApNGRc8pSSZoTzfAO4DYG0r7KF1vmvsGrsat7prwHbRKEKFXd8Zt4eAG4vbjR48WZbh0oMOHTbaGvC4843ehWt0WQ8Dbo5zgfLXl3z5Hq0-3rLl8yoyXIouEjWhtTQspozGggMXTFKeytSQsqorqZiRzGgjY5GWVKU0TphMKGGMEWUSvkAPY2zr3WcPoSv2TTCw22kLrg8F5WxwSUbIgN6foVvXezs890OlTKRCDhQZKeNdCB7qovXNXvuvgpLiUHhxXvhguTsG9-UeqpPht-EBiEYg6DX8ufpf4De2OYae
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_24436
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cct_2015_04_004
crossref_primary_10_2196_cancer_6996
crossref_primary_10_3892_mmr_2014_2659
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1470_2045_14_70380_8
crossref_primary_10_1080_23809000_2016_1174068
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers9060059
crossref_primary_10_1097_HRP_0000000000000010
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_32730
crossref_primary_10_4137_BCBCR_S39385
Cites_doi 10.1001/jama.297.19.2112
10.1093/jnci/95.4.263
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3845
10.1093/jnci/djq508
10.1001/jama.2012.3424
10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.07.002
10.1016/j.soncn.2009.11.009
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012
10.1056/NEJMp0911494
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3324
10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2341
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0197
10.1186/1477-7525-5-24
10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4784
10.1186/1756-9966-27-32
10.1007/s11136-004-0705-2
10.1093/annonc/mdm121
10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4644
10.1056/NEJMe068291
10.1007/s11136-011-9999-z
10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70910-X
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011
10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0172
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.5329
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s), 2013
SAGE Publications © Apr 2013
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s), 2013
– notice: SAGE Publications © Apr 2013
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7RV
7TK
7TS
7U7
7X7
7XB
88E
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
AN0
AZQEC
BENPR
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1P
M2O
MBDVC
NAPCQ
PADUT
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
DOI 10.1177/1740774513475529
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Physical Education Index
Toxicology Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Public Health Database (Proquest)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
British Nursing Database
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Research Library
Research Library (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Research Library China
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central China
Physical Education Index
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Research Library
Research Library China
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest Central Basic
Toxicology Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
British Nursing Index with Full Text
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Research Library Prep

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1740-7753
EndPage 249
ExternalDocumentID 2932301351
10_1177_1740774513475529
23539108
10.1177_1740774513475529
Genre Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Intramural NIH HHS
GroupedDBID ---
-MK
-TM
.2E
.2J
.2N
01A
04C
0R~
1~K
29B
31R
31U
31X
31Z
36B
3V.
4.4
53G
54M
5GY
5RE
5VS
6PF
7RV
7X7
88E
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8R4
8R5
AABMB
AACMV
AACTG
AADTT
AADUE
AAEWN
AAGMC
AAJPV
AAKGS
AAQDB
AARDL
AARIX
AATAA
AATBZ
AAUAS
AAWTL
ABAWP
ABCCA
ABEIX
ABFWQ
ABHQH
ABJIS
ABKRH
ABLUO
ABPNF
ABQXT
ABRHV
ABTDE
ABUWG
ABVFX
ACARO
ACDSZ
ACDXX
ACFEJ
ACGFS
ACGZU
ACJTF
ACLFY
ACLZU
ACOFE
ACOXC
ACPRK
ACROE
ACSBE
ACSIQ
ACTQU
ACUAV
ACUIR
ACXKE
ACXMB
ADBBV
ADRRZ
ADZZY
AECGH
AEDTQ
AEIJN
AEKYL
AENEX
AEPTA
AEQLS
AERKM
AESZF
AEUHG
AEUIJ
AEWDL
AEWHI
AEXNY
AFEET
AFKRA
AFKRG
AFMOU
AFQAA
AFRAH
AFUIA
AGKLV
AGNHF
AGWFA
AHHFK
AHMBA
AIIQI
AIOMO
AJUZI
AJXAJ
ALIPV
ALJHS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALTZF
AMCVQ
AN0
ANDLU
ARTOV
ASPBG
AUTPY
AUVAJ
AVWKF
AYAKG
AZFZN
AZQEC
B3H
B8M
B8R
B8Z
B94
BBRGL
BDDNI
BENPR
BKEYQ
BKIIM
BKSCU
BMSDO
BNQBC
BPACV
BPHCQ
BSEHC
BVXVI
BWJAD
CAG
CCPQU
CDWPY
CFDXU
COF
CS3
DB0
DC-
DC.
DF0
DO-
DOPDO
DU5
DV7
DV9
DWQXO
EBD
EBS
EIHBH
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EX3
F5P
FEDTE
FHBDP
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION
GUQSH
HF~
HMCUK
HVGLF
HZ~
J8X
JCYGO
K.F
M1P
M2O
M4V
N9A
NAPCQ
O9-
P.B
P2P
PADUT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
Q7L
Q7U
Q83
ROL
S01
SCNPE
SDB
SFC
SFK
SFT
SGO
SGR
SGV
SGZ
SHG
SNB
SPJ
SPQ
SPV
STM
SV3
UDS
UKHRP
WOW
YHZ
ZGI
ZONMY
ZPPRI
ZRKOI
ZSSAH
ACJER
AGWNL
ALKWR
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
H13
NPM
AAYXX
ADVBO
CITATION
7TK
7TS
7U7
7XB
8FK
C1K
K9.
MBDVC
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-5f01f6c24121453e352613969c0bdfd672c62cac6459b1791482681022207c83
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1740-7745
IngestDate Fri Oct 25 00:50:41 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 22:11:59 EDT 2024
Mon Nov 04 10:08:59 EST 2024
Tue Oct 15 23:44:43 EDT 2024
Tue Jul 16 20:37:33 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c365t-5f01f6c24121453e352613969c0bdfd672c62cac6459b1791482681022207c83
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 23539108
PQID 1321925956
PQPubID 40366
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1321796200
proquest_journals_1321925956
crossref_primary_10_1177_1740774513475529
pubmed_primary_23539108
sage_journals_10_1177_1740774513475529
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20130400
2013-Apr
2013-04-00
20130401
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 4
  year: 2013
  text: 20130400
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London, England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London, England
– name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Clinical trials (London, England)
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Trials
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher SAGE Publications
Sage Publications Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: SAGE Publications
– name: Sage Publications Ltd
References Cella, Riley, Stone 2006; 63
Ganz, Gotay 2007; 25
Law, Kawasumi, Morgan 2011; 30
Gondek, Sagnier, Gilchrist, Woolley 2007; 25
Adamowicz, Jassem, Katz, Saad 2011; 38
Revicki, Hays, Cella 2008; 61
Lemieux, Goodwin, Bordeleau, Lauzier, Théberge 2011; 103
Garcia, Cella, Clauser 2007; 25
Gershon, Rothrock, Hanrahan, Bass, Cella 2010; 11
Lipscomb, Reeve, Clauser 2007; 25
Moinpour, Denicoff, Bruner 2007; 25
Basch, Iasonos, McDonough 2006; 7
Zarin, Ide, Tse 2007; 297
Basch 2010; 362
O’Mara, Denicoff 2010; 26
Califf, Zarin, Kramer 2012; 307
Montazeri 2008; 27
Moinpour, Donaldson, Liepa, Sloan 2011; 21
Bren 2006; 40
Trotti, Colevas, Setser, Basch 2007; 25
Drazen, Zarin 2007; 356
Wyrwich, Bullinger, Aaronson 2005; 14
Perry, Kowalski, Chang 2007; 5
Bruner, Bryan, Aaronson 2007; 25
Joly, Vardy, Pintilie, Tannock 2007; 18
Goodwin, Black, Bordeleau, Ganz 2003; 95
bibr13-1740774513475529
bibr18-1740774513475529
bibr9-1740774513475529
bibr30-1740774513475529
Institute of Medicine Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization (bibr1-1740774513475529) 2009
bibr21-1740774513475529
Moinpour CM (bibr26-1740774513475529) 2011; 21
bibr19-1740774513475529
bibr3-1740774513475529
bibr20-1740774513475529
bibr33-1740774513475529
bibr12-1740774513475529
Basch E (bibr8-1740774513475529) 2011
bibr16-1740774513475529
bibr6-1740774513475529
Bren L (bibr25-1740774513475529) 2006; 40
bibr28-1740774513475529
bibr11-1740774513475529
bibr2-1740774513475529
Gershon RC (bibr24-1740774513475529) 2010; 11
bibr32-1740774513475529
bibr15-1740774513475529
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (bibr7-1740774513475529) 2009
Mullins C (bibr5-1740774513475529) 2010
bibr23-1740774513475529
bibr29-1740774513475529
bibr10-1740774513475529
bibr27-1740774513475529
bibr31-1740774513475529
bibr14-1740774513475529
bibr17-1740774513475529
bibr4-1740774513475529
bibr22-1740774513475529
References_xml – volume: 21
  start-page: 765
  year: 2011
  end-page: 75
  article-title: Evaluating health-related quality-of-life therapeutic effectiveness in a clinical trial with extensive nonignorable missing data and heterogeneous response: Results from a phase III randomized trial of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer
  publication-title: Qual Life Res
  contributor:
    fullname: Sloan
– volume: 25
  start-page: 5121
  year: 2007
  end-page: 27
  article-title: Patient-reported outcomes and the evolution of adverse event reporting in oncology
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  contributor:
    fullname: Basch
– volume: 27
  start-page: 32
  year: 2008
  article-title: Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: A bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007
  publication-title: J Exp Clin Cancer Res
  contributor:
    fullname: Montazeri
– volume: 5
  start-page: 24
  year: 2007
  article-title: Quality of life assessment in women with breast cancer: Benefits, acceptability and utilization
  publication-title: Health Qual Life Outcomes
  contributor:
    fullname: Chang
– volume: 63
  start-page: 1179
  year: 2006
  end-page: 94
  article-title: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
  contributor:
    fullname: Stone
– volume: 95
  start-page: 263
  year: 2003
  end-page: 81
  article-title: Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer – taking stock
  publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst
  contributor:
    fullname: Ganz
– volume: 61
  start-page: 102
  year: 2008
  end-page: 09
  article-title: Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
  contributor:
    fullname: Cella
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2338
  year: 2011
  end-page: 45
  article-title: Despite law, fewer than one in eight completed studies of drugs and biologics are reported on time on ClinicalTrials.gov
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
  contributor:
    fullname: Morgan
– volume: 25
  start-page: 5051
  year: 2007
  end-page: 57
  article-title: Issues andchallenges with integrating patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials supported by the National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trials networks
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  contributor:
    fullname: Aaronson
– volume: 103
  start-page: 178
  year: 2011
  end-page: 231
  article-title: Quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer: An updated systematic review (2001–2009)
  publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst
  contributor:
    fullname: Théberge
– volume: 297
  start-page: 2112
  year: 2007
  end-page: 20
  article-title: Issues in the registration of clinical trials
  publication-title: JAMA
  contributor:
    fullname: Tse
– volume: 25
  start-page: 5106
  year: 2007
  end-page: 12
  article-title: Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: A patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  contributor:
    fullname: Clauser
– volume: 40
  start-page: 27
  year: 2006
  end-page: 32
  article-title: The importance of patient-reported outcomes … it’s all about the patients
  publication-title: FDA Consum
  contributor:
    fullname: Bren
– volume: 38
  start-page: 554
  year: 2011
  end-page: 58
  article-title: Assessment of quality of life in advanced breast cancer. An overview of randomized phase III trials
  publication-title: Cancer Treat Rev
  contributor:
    fullname: Saad
– volume: 25
  start-page: 5063
  year: 2007
  end-page: 69
  article-title: Use of patient-reported outcomes in phase III cancer treatment trials: Lessons learned and future directions
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  contributor:
    fullname: Gotay
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1935
  year: 2007
  end-page: 42
  article-title: Quality of life and/or symptom control in randomized clinical trials for patients with advanced cancer
  publication-title: Ann Oncol
  contributor:
    fullname: Tannock
– volume: 11
  start-page: 304
  year: 2010
  end-page: 14
  article-title: The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research
  publication-title: J Appl Meas
  contributor:
    fullname: Cella
– volume: 307
  start-page: 1838
  year: 2012
  end-page: 47
  article-title: Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007–2010
  publication-title: JAMA
  contributor:
    fullname: Kramer
– volume: 14
  start-page: 285
  year: 2005
  end-page: 95
  article-title: Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes
  publication-title: Qual Life Res
  contributor:
    fullname: Aaronson
– volume: 25
  start-page: 5087
  year: 2007
  end-page: 93
  article-title: Current status of patient-reported outcomes in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials and product labels
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  contributor:
    fullname: Woolley
– volume: 7
  start-page: 903
  year: 2006
  end-page: 09
  article-title: Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: Results of a questionnaire-based study
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
  contributor:
    fullname: McDonough
– volume: 362
  start-page: 865
  year: 2010
  end-page: 69
  article-title: The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Basch
– volume: 25
  start-page: 5133
  year: 2007
  end-page: 40
  article-title: Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: Taking stock, moving forward
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  contributor:
    fullname: Clauser
– volume: 25
  start-page: 5100
  year: 2007
  end-page: 05
  article-title: Funding patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  contributor:
    fullname: Bruner
– volume: 356
  start-page: 184
  year: 2007
  end-page: 85
  article-title: Salvation by registration
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Zarin
– volume: 26
  start-page: 68
  year: 2010
  end-page: 78
  article-title: Health related quality of life in NCI-sponsored cancer treatment trials
  publication-title: Semin Oncol Nurs
  contributor:
    fullname: Denicoff
– ident: bibr31-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1001/jama.297.19.2112
– ident: bibr10-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.4.263
– ident: bibr13-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3845
– ident: bibr11-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq508
– ident: bibr32-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3424
– ident: bibr3-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.07.002
– ident: bibr14-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2009.11.009
– ident: bibr27-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012
– ident: bibr19-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0911494
– ident: bibr15-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3324
– ident: bibr22-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2341
– ident: bibr29-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0197
– ident: bibr16-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-24
– ident: bibr21-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4784
– ident: bibr12-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-27-32
– ident: bibr28-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0705-2
– ident: bibr4-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm121
– ident: bibr6-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4644
– ident: bibr33-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMe068291
– volume: 21
  start-page: 765
  year: 2011
  ident: bibr26-1740774513475529
  publication-title: Qual Life Res
  doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9999-z
  contributor:
    fullname: Moinpour CM
– volume: 40
  start-page: 27
  year: 2006
  ident: bibr25-1740774513475529
  publication-title: FDA Consum
  contributor:
    fullname: Bren L
– volume-title: Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims Food and Drug Administration
  year: 2009
  ident: bibr7-1740774513475529
  contributor:
    fullname: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health
– ident: bibr20-1740774513475529
– volume-title: Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research
  year: 2009
  ident: bibr1-1740774513475529
  contributor:
    fullname: Institute of Medicine Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization
– volume: 11
  start-page: 304
  year: 2010
  ident: bibr24-1740774513475529
  publication-title: J Appl Meas
  contributor:
    fullname: Gershon RC
– volume-title: Recommendations for Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes into the Design of Clinical Trials in Adult Oncology
  year: 2011
  ident: bibr8-1740774513475529
  contributor:
    fullname: Basch E
– ident: bibr18-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70910-X
– ident: bibr9-1740774513475529
– ident: bibr23-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011
– ident: bibr30-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0172
– ident: bibr2-1740774513475529
– volume-title: Effectiveness Guidance Document: Proposed Recommendations for Designing Clinical Trials for ‘New Indications’ of Approved Oncology Drugs for Treatment of Late Stage Disease
  year: 2010
  ident: bibr5-1740774513475529
  contributor:
    fullname: Mullins C
– ident: bibr17-1740774513475529
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.5329
SSID ssj0028583
Score 2.078825
Snippet Background Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered...
Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes...
Background Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered...
BACKGROUNDPublic and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
sage
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 243
SubjectTerms Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Clinical trials
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic - methods
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Data Collection - methods
Data Collection - statistics & numerical data
Design of experiments
Drug Industry - methods
Female
Humans
Neoplasm Staging
Patient-Centered Care - organization & administration
Research Design
Research methodology
Self Report
Title The use and reporting of patient-reported outcomes in phase III breast cancer trials
URI https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1740774513475529
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23539108
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1321925956
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1321796200
Volume 10
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LS8QwEB58gHgR39YXEUTwEOwrafYkKoorKCIr7G1p0hS9tKvt_n9n0qzrA730kJY2nUky32Qm3wAcGzrMKCPNlUlznuay4MSqxjNZRpnUQpdO0_cP8vY5vRuKod9wa3xa5XRNdAt1URvaIz9DrwnBiEA4fz5-41Q1iqKrvoTGPCxGcSgppSsbzhwuJRwNJ4LuEFFkKmZhyjNqoyY6SSmEA5hfzNIvrPktz8uZnptVWPGYkV10Sl6DOVutw9K9j4pvwAB1zSaNZXlVsC4IgAaJ1SXzrKm8a7QFqyct_q5t2GvFxi9owVi_32eaMtNbZmgEvDNXyKPZhMHN9eDqlvtqCdwkUrRclGFUSoMWmcjHE0vE9wjvZM-EuigLmcVGxiY3xB6jiZQ0Rc9COYcvzIxKtmChqiu7AyxEjJCT6xhalWphe0prXSYKkV9oSpsHcDqV1WjccWKMIk8b_lOuAexPhTnys6MZzXQZwNHnbRzXFKzIK1tPumeynsRJHMB2p4TPj8WJSBDmqABOSCtfXvxHL3b_78UeLMeuygUl5OzDQvs-sQeINVp96AYUXtVVdAiLl9cPj08f8hTMRQ
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,12068,12235,21400,27936,27937,31731,31732,33278,33279,33756,33757,43322,43591,43817
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3dS8MwED_UgfoifludGkEEH4Ld2qTdk6gom25DZMLeSpOm6Es7bff_e9dm8wt9TUua3iW53-UuvwM41XSZUbYUD7Ufcz-WCSdWNR7ItBVIJVRaaXowlN1n_34sxvbArbBplbM9sdqok1zTGfkFek0IRgTC-cvJG6eqURRdtSU0FqFBVFXofDWub4ePT3OXKxQVESfCbhdxpC8-A5UX1EZNdJdSiApifjFMv9Dmt0yvyvjcrcOaRY3sqlbzBiyYbBOWBzYuvgUj1DabFobFWcLqMACaJJanzPKm8rrRJCyflvjDpmCvGZu8oA1jvV6PKcpNL5mmOfDOqlIexTaM7m5HN11u6yVw7UlRcpG6rVRqtMlEP-4Zor5HgCc72lVJmsigrWVbx5r4YxTRkvroW4SVy-cGOvR2YCnLM7MHzEWUEJPz6JrQV8J0QqVU6oWI_VydmtiB85msoknNihG1LHH4T7k60JwJM7Lro4g-tenAyfwxzmwKV8SZyaf1O0FH4jJ2YLdWwvxjbU94CHRCB85IK186_mMU-_-P4hhWuqNBP-r3hg8HsNqual5Qek4Tlsr3qTlE5FGqIzu9PgAOfc40
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+use+and+reporting+of+patient-reported+outcomes+in+phase+III+breast+cancer+trials&rft.jtitle=Clinical+trials+%28London%2C+England%29&rft.au=Brim%2C+Remy+L&rft.au=Pearson%2C+Steven+D&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.issn=1740-7745&rft.eissn=1740-7753&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=249&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F1740774513475529&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1177_1740774513475529
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1740-7745&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1740-7745&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1740-7745&client=summon