Comparing “Individual Health” Message Framing to “Organizational Efficiency” Message Framing to Encourage Adoption of Wearable Health Technologies at Work

Purpose: To determine the relative impact of framing on employee intention to adopt wearable technology (eg, Fitbits) at work. Setting and Design: Posttest only online experiment utilizing a 2 (framing: organizational efficiency vs individual health) × 2 (financial incentive: absent vs present) betw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of health promotion Vol. 35; no. 2; pp. 271 - 274
Main Authors Kwong, Jillian K., Cruz, Ignacio, Murphy, Sheila T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.02.2021
American Journal of Health Promotion
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose: To determine the relative impact of framing on employee intention to adopt wearable technology (eg, Fitbits) at work. Setting and Design: Posttest only online experiment utilizing a 2 (framing: organizational efficiency vs individual health) × 2 (financial incentive: absent vs present) between-subjects design. Participants: Participants (N = 310) were 18 years or older, currently employed, and residing in the United States. Measures: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) subscale on behavioral intent (modified for wearable technology). Analysis: Chi-square and between-subjects analysis of variance. Results: Participants receiving the organizational efficiency frame (M = 3.97) expressed significantly lower intention to adopt a wearable compared to the individual health frame (M = 4.37), F2,308 = 3.99, P = .047. Financial incentives had a positive effect on adoption intention (M = 4.39 with incentive, M = 3.95 no incentive), F2,308 = 4.46, P = .036. The main effects of frame and incentive were additive, with participants in the individual health with incentive condition (n = 78, M = 4.60) expressing the highest intention to adopt and organizational efficiency without incentive expressing the lowest adoption intention (n = 77, M = 3.80; P = .03). Conclusions: Messaging emphasizing individual health benefits plus financial incentives might prove most successful when encouraging adoption of wearables at work.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0890-1171
2168-6602
2168-6602
DOI:10.1177/0890117120944314