Psychophysical evaluation of gamut mapping techniques using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries
Using a paired comparison paradigm, various gamut mapping algorithms were evaluated using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries. The test images consisted of simple rendered spheres floating in front of a gray background. Using CIELAB as our device-independent color space, cut-off v...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE transactions on image processing Vol. 6; no. 7; pp. 977 - 989 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
IEEE
01.07.1997
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Using a paired comparison paradigm, various gamut mapping algorithms were evaluated using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries. The test images consisted of simple rendered spheres floating in front of a gray background. Using CIELAB as our device-independent color space, cut-off values for lightness and chroma, based on the statistics of the images, were chosen to reduce the gamuts for the test images. The gamut mapping algorithms consisted of combinations of clipping and mapping the original gamut in linear piecewise segments. Complete color space compression in RGB and CIELAB was also tested. Each of the colored originals (R,G,B,C,M,Y, and Skin) were mapped separately in lightness and chroma. In addition, each algorithm was implemented with saturation (C/sup *//L/sup */) allowed to vary or retain the same values as in the original image. Pairs of test images with reduced color gamuts were presented to twenty subjects along with the original image. For each pair the subjects chose the test image that better reproduced the original. Rank orders and interval scales of algorithm performance with confidence limits were then derived. Clipping all out-of-gamut colors was the best method for mapping chroma. For lightness mapping at low lightness levels and high lightness levels particular gamut mapping algorithms consistently produced images chosen as most like the original. The choice of device-independent color space may also influence which gamut mapping algorithms are best. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Using a paired comparison paradigm, various gamut mapping algorithms were evaluated using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries. The test images consisted of simple rendered spheres floating in front of a gray background. Using CIELAB as our device-independent color space, cut-off values for lightness and chroma, based on the statistics of the images, were chosen to reduce the gamuts for the test images. The gamut mapping algorithms consisted of combinations of clipping and mapping the original gamut in linear piecewise segments. Complete color space compression in RGB and CIELAB was also tested. Each of the colored originals (R,G,B,C,M,Y, and Skin) were mapped separately in lightness and chroma. In addition, each algorithm was implemented with saturation (C(*)/L(*)) allowed to vary or retain the same values as in the original image. Pairs of test images with reduced color gamuts were presented to twenty subjects along with the original image. For each pair the subjects chose the test image that better reproduced the original. Rank orders and interval scales of algorithm performance with confidence limits were then derived. Clipping all out-of-gamut colors was the best method for mapping chroma. For lightness mapping at low lightness levels and high lightness levels particular gamut mapping algorithms consistently produced images chosen as most like the original. The choice of device-independent color space may also influence which gamut mapping algorithms are best Using a paired comparison paradigm, various gamut mapping algorithms were evaluated using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries. The test images consisted of simple rendered spheres floating in front of a gray background. Using CIELAB as our device-independent color space, cut-off values for lightness and chroma, based on the statistics of the images, were chosen to reduce the gamuts for the test images. The gamut mapping algorithms consisted of combinations of clipping and mapping the original gamut in linear piecewise segments. Complete color space compression in RGB and CIELAB was also tested. Each of the colored originals (R,G,B,C,M,Y, and Skin) were mapped separately in lightness and chroma. In addition, each algorithm was implemented with saturation (C(*)/L(*)) allowed to vary or retain the same values as in the original image. Pairs of test images with reduced color gamuts were presented to twenty subjects along with the original image. For each pair the subjects chose the test image that better reproduced the original. Rank orders and interval scales of algorithm performance with confidence limits were then derived. Clipping all out-of-gamut colors was the best method for mapping chroma. For lightness mapping at low lightness levels and high lightness levels particular gamut mapping algorithms consistently produced images chosen as most like the original. The choice of device-independent color space may also influence which gamut mapping algorithms are best.Using a paired comparison paradigm, various gamut mapping algorithms were evaluated using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries. The test images consisted of simple rendered spheres floating in front of a gray background. Using CIELAB as our device-independent color space, cut-off values for lightness and chroma, based on the statistics of the images, were chosen to reduce the gamuts for the test images. The gamut mapping algorithms consisted of combinations of clipping and mapping the original gamut in linear piecewise segments. Complete color space compression in RGB and CIELAB was also tested. Each of the colored originals (R,G,B,C,M,Y, and Skin) were mapped separately in lightness and chroma. In addition, each algorithm was implemented with saturation (C(*)/L(*)) allowed to vary or retain the same values as in the original image. Pairs of test images with reduced color gamuts were presented to twenty subjects along with the original image. For each pair the subjects chose the test image that better reproduced the original. Rank orders and interval scales of algorithm performance with confidence limits were then derived. Clipping all out-of-gamut colors was the best method for mapping chroma. For lightness mapping at low lightness levels and high lightness levels particular gamut mapping algorithms consistently produced images chosen as most like the original. The choice of device-independent color space may also influence which gamut mapping algorithms are best. Using a paired comparison paradigm, various gamut mapping algorithms were evaluated using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries. The test images consisted of simple rendered spheres floating in front of a gray background. Using CIELAB as our device-independent color space, cut-off values for lightness and chroma, based on the statistics of the images, were chosen to reduce the gamuts for the test images. The gamut mapping algorithms consisted of combinations of clipping and mapping the original gamut in linear piecewise segments. Complete color space compression in RGB and CIELAB was also tested. Each of the colored originals (R,G,B,C,M,Y, and Skin) were mapped separately in lightness and chroma. In addition, each algorithm was implemented with saturation (C(*)/L(*)) allowed to vary or retain the same values as in the original image. Pairs of test images with reduced color gamuts were presented to twenty subjects along with the original image. For each pair the subjects chose the test image that better reproduced the original. Rank orders and interval scales of algorithm performance with confidence limits were then derived. Clipping all out-of-gamut colors was the best method for mapping chroma. For lightness mapping at low lightness levels and high lightness levels particular gamut mapping algorithms consistently produced images chosen as most like the original. The choice of device-independent color space may also influence which gamut mapping algorithms are best. Using a paired comparison paradigm, various gamut mapping algorithms were evaluated using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries. The test images consisted of simple rendered spheres floating in front of a gray background. Using CIELAB as our device-independent color space, cut-off values for lightness and chroma, based on the statistics of the images, were chosen to reduce the gamuts for the test images. The gamut mapping algorithms consisted of combinations of clipping and mapping the original gamut in linear piecewise segments. Complete color space compression in RGB and CIELAB was also tested. Each of the colored originals (R,G,B,C,M,Y, and Skin) were mapped separately in lightness and chroma. In addition, each algorithm was implemented with saturation (C/sup *//L/sup */) allowed to vary or retain the same values as in the original image. Pairs of test images with reduced color gamuts were presented to twenty subjects along with the original image. For each pair the subjects chose the test image that better reproduced the original. Rank orders and interval scales of algorithm performance with confidence limits were then derived. Clipping all out-of-gamut colors was the best method for mapping chroma. For lightness mapping at low lightness levels and high lightness levels particular gamut mapping algorithms consistently produced images chosen as most like the original. The choice of device-independent color space may also influence which gamut mapping algorithms are best. |
Author | Montag, E.D. Fairchild, M.D. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: E.D. surname: Montag fullname: Montag, E.D. email: edmpci@ritvax.isc.rit.edu organization: Munsell Color Sci. Lab., Rochester Inst. of Technol., NY, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: M.D. surname: Fairchild fullname: Fairchild, M.D. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18282988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkc1P3DAQxa2Kqny0B64ckE-tegjY8WeOFSotEhIc4GwZe7JrlDjBTpD2v6-XbDlUiJ5mNPN7T6M3h2gvDhEQOqbkjFLSnGt2JhpVK_YBHdCG04oQXu-VnghVKcqbfXSY8yMhlAsqP6F9qmtdN1ofoHSbN249jOtNDs52GJ5tN9spDBEPLV7Zfp5wb8cxxBWewK1jeJoh4zlvBzn0Ywc4QfSQwOPQ21VZ2uixTVNogwvFcjF5GObobQqQP6OPre0yfNnVI3R_-fPu4nd1ffPr6uLHdeWYZFPlmeONFlZ7TpzngmniBdiWci_aRlpXu1pCK7iSSnIiG-qpINJpymTREXaEvi2-Yxq2R0-mD9lB19kIw5yNYrxWlCpZyK_vkrUWgmrG_g8qRrTWooCnO3B-6MGbMZVs0sb8Db4A5wvg0pBzgta4ML3kPiUbOkOJ2b7WaGaW1xbF938Ur6ZvsCcLGwDgldst_wBpC6u9 |
CODEN | IIPRE4 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1108_17563781011066701 crossref_primary_10_1109_79_664673 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dsp_2024_104406 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvcir_2019_04_006 crossref_primary_10_1080_01969722_2012_732797 crossref_primary_10_1002_1520_6378_200102_26_1_85__AID_COL9_3_0_CO_2_2 crossref_primary_10_1006_cviu_1998_0697 crossref_primary_10_1109_5_687831 crossref_primary_10_1109_83_806624 crossref_primary_10_1117_1_2177631 crossref_primary_10_1117_1_2955996 crossref_primary_10_1109_TIP_2017_2724241 crossref_primary_10_1109_TIP_2007_904455 crossref_primary_10_1109_83_597268 crossref_primary_10_1117_1_482706 crossref_primary_10_1117_1_482705 crossref_primary_10_1109_TIP_2006_891346 |
Cites_doi | 10.1117/12.149037 10.2352/CIC.1993.1.1.art00049 10.1037/h0070288 10.1117/12.44407 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1974.tb00528.x 10.2352/CIC.1993.1.1.art00017 10.1002/col.5080180504 10.1117/12.206553 10.1002/col.5080200506 10.1145/46165.48045 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7SC 8FD JQ2 L7M L~C L~D 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1109/83.597273 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Technology Research Database ProQuest Computer Science Collection Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Computer and Information Systems Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Computer and Information Systems Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Applied Sciences Engineering Psychology |
EISSN | 1941-0042 |
EndPage | 989 |
ExternalDocumentID | 18282988 10_1109_83_597273 597273 |
Genre | orig-research Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .DC 0R~ 29I 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS 6IK 97E AAJGR AARMG AASAJ AAWTH ABAZT ABFSI ABQJQ ABVLG ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK AENEX AETIX AGQYO AGSQL AHBIQ AI. AIBXA AKJIK AKQYR ALLEH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ASUFR ATWAV BEFXN BFFAM BGNUA BKEBE BPEOZ CS3 DU5 E.L EBS EJD F5P HZ~ H~9 ICLAB IFIPE IFJZH IPLJI JAVBF LAI M43 MS~ O9- OCL P2P RIA RIE RNS TAE TN5 VH1 AAYOK AAYXX CITATION RIG NPM 7SC 8FD JQ2 L7M L~C L~D 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-d3c4985a8d40cd45380d5eaf14d5f96ac2c26ef54767640691d1506c813698503 |
IEDL.DBID | RIE |
ISSN | 1057-7149 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 06:26:45 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 19:30:28 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 08:55:06 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:06:48 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:16:34 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:58 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 27 02:29:46 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Language | English |
License | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c363t-d3c4985a8d40cd45380d5eaf14d5f96ac2c26ef54767640691d1506c813698503 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
PMID | 18282988 |
PQID | 27308885 |
PQPubID | 23500 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_27308885 proquest_miscellaneous_734271176 crossref_primary_10_1109_83_597273 proquest_miscellaneous_28551833 pubmed_primary_18282988 crossref_citationtrail_10_1109_83_597273 ieee_primary_597273 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 1900 |
PublicationDate | 1997-07-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1997-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 1997 text: 1997-07-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 1990 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | IEEE transactions on image processing |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | TIP |
PublicationTitleAlternate | IEEE Trans Image Process |
PublicationYear | 1997 |
Publisher | IEEE |
Publisher_xml | – name: IEEE |
References | hoshino (ref10) 1993; 1909 ref13 ref14 fairchild (ref4) 1994 glassner (ref3) 1995 ref11 keppel (ref17) 1973 stone (ref1) 1988; 7 ref16 ref19 ref18 david (ref15) 1963 fairchild (ref6) 1994 wolski (ref2) 1994 gentile (ref9) 1990; 16 kim (ref5) 1993 braun (ref7) 1995 pariser (ref12) 1991 macdonald (ref8) 1993 |
References_xml | – start-page: 9 year: 1994 ident: ref6 article-title: visual evaluation and evolution of the rlab color space publication-title: Proc IS& T/SID s 2nd Color Imaging Conf Color Science Systems and Applications – year: 1963 ident: ref15 publication-title: The Method of Paired Comparisons – start-page: 144 year: 1973 ident: ref17 publication-title: Design and Analysis – volume: 1909 start-page: 152 year: 1993 ident: ref10 article-title: color gamut mapping techniques for color hard copy images publication-title: Proc SPIE doi: 10.1117/12.149037 – start-page: 193 year: 1993 ident: ref8 article-title: gamut mapping in perceptual color space publication-title: Proc IS& T/SID s Color Imaging Conf Transforms and Transportability of Color doi: 10.2352/CIC.1993.1.1.art00049 – start-page: 865 year: 1994 ident: ref4 article-title: some hidden requirements for device-independent color imaging publication-title: SID 94 Digest – year: 1995 ident: ref3 publication-title: Principles of Digital Image Synthesis – volume: 16 start-page: 176 year: 1990 ident: ref9 article-title: a comparison of techniques for color gamut mismatch compensation publication-title: J Imag Tech – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1037/h0070288 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1117/12.44407 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1974.tb00528.x – start-page: 89 year: 1994 ident: ref2 article-title: gamut mapping: squeezing the most out of your color system publication-title: Proc IS& T/SID s 2nd Color Imaging Conf Color Science Systems and Applications – start-page: 72 year: 1993 ident: ref5 article-title: comparing appearance models using pictorial images publication-title: Proc IS& T/SID s Color Imaging Conf Transforms and Transportability of Color doi: 10.2352/CIC.1993.1.1.art00017 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1002/col.5080180504 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1117/12.206553 – start-page: 105 year: 1991 ident: ref12 article-title: an investigation of color gamut reduction techniques publication-title: Proc IS& T Symp Electronic Prepress Technology— Color Printing – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1002/col.5080200506 – start-page: 93 year: 1995 ident: ref7 article-title: evaluation of five color-appearance transforms across changes in viewing conditions and media publication-title: Proc IS& T/SID s 3rd Color Imaging Conf e Color Science Systems and Applications – volume: 7 start-page: 249 year: 1988 ident: ref1 article-title: color gamut mapping and the printing of digital image publication-title: ACM Transactions on Graphics doi: 10.1145/46165.48045 |
SSID | ssj0014516 |
Score | 1.7631282 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Using a paired comparison paradigm, various gamut mapping algorithms were evaluated using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries. The test... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref ieee |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 977 |
SubjectTerms | Cathode ray tubes Image coding Image segmentation Printers Psychology Rendering (computer graphics) Skin Statistical analysis Testing |
Title | Psychophysical evaluation of gamut mapping techniques using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries |
URI | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/597273 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18282988 https://www.proquest.com/docview/27308885 https://www.proquest.com/docview/28551833 https://www.proquest.com/docview/734271176 |
Volume | 6 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjZ1Lb9QwEIBHtKdyoHR5dAulFuLAJdskfuaIEFWFVE5U6i1ybGdVwWarTXKAX1-P7c0i1CJueUwSJx7b44znG4APlinkX9usbEuesVborKkambGGMk5L0-gcg5OvvonLa_b1ht8kznaIhXHOhcVnboGbwZdv12bEX2Xn3vj1o-0e7Pl5WwzVmhwGmG82ODa5zKS3-hNEqMirc0UX8UIEhCr0HIY0K7tRKKRVedzCDCPNxWEM4e4DoBAXmPxYjEOzML__wjf-50s8h2fJ4iSfooocwRPXzeAwWZ8kte1-Bk__QBPO4GDqGX-9gE3cuUt1SnaIcLJuyVKvxoGsNJIelmSCwvYE19QvSX-LAGKyCTnr_BNvV74L64nuLEG1jQSLdJMmJHnC2ftLuL748v3zZZaSNWSGCjpklhpWKa6VZbmxvp5VbrnTbcEsbyuhTWlK4VrOpJACw20Li3BDowoq_HU5fQX73bpzx0By1zBJ_TzM98asdFobJitJnSmYUUyXc_i4rbzaJJI5JtT4WYcZTV7VitbxM8_h_SR6F_EdDwnNsJomge3Rs61C1L7JoR9Fd2499rU_6ftmxf8hoRB0R_09yCMS0r-ZLAop5vA6KtuufElHTx4s1hs4iARdXDH8FvaHzehOvV00NO9Ci7gHfCsKgQ |
linkProvider | IEEE |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjZ1Lb9QwEIBHUA6UA4WFluVVC3Hgkm0S27FzRFWrBdqeWqm3yLGdVQWbrTbJAX49HtubRahF3PKYJE48tscZzzcAHw2TyL82Sd7kPGFNoZK6rEXCaso4zXWtUgxOPr8o5lfs6zW_jpxtHwtjrfWLz-wMN70v36z0gL_Kjpzx60bbh_DIDfs8C8Fao8sAM8561yYXiXB2f8QIZWl5JOksXIqIUIm-Q59oZTsO-cQq99uYfqw53QtB3J1HFOISk--zoa9n-tdfAMf_fI1n8DTanORzUJLn8MC2E9iL9ieJrbubwJM_4IQT2B37xp8vYB12bmOtki0knKwaslDLoSdLhayHBRmxsB3BVfUL0t0ggpisfdY698SbpevEOqJaQ1BxA8Mi3qT2aZ5w_v4Srk5PLo_nSUzXkGha0D4xVLNSciUNS7VxNS1Tw61qMmZ4UxZK5zovbMOZKESBAbeZQbyhlhkt3HUp3YeddtXaV0BSWzNB3UzM9ccst0ppJkpBrc6YlkzlU_i0qbxKR5Y5ptT4Ufk5TVpWklbhM0_hwyh6GwAedwlNsJpGgc3Rw41CVK7RoSdFtXY1dJU76Xpnyf8hIRF1R909yD0Swr2ZyDJRTOEgKNu2fFFHX99ZrEN4PL88P6vOvlx8ewO7gaeL64ffwk6_Huw7ZyX19XvfOn4DffMNyg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychophysical+evaluation+of+gamut+mapping+techniques+using+simple+rendered+images+and+artificial+gamut+boundaries&rft.jtitle=IEEE+transactions+on+image+processing&rft.au=Montag%2C+E+D&rft.au=Fairchild%2C+M+D&rft.date=1997-07-01&rft.issn=1057-7149&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=977&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109%2F83.597273&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1057-7149&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1057-7149&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1057-7149&client=summon |