Ethical issues in gastroenterology research
Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of interest might affect research, (ii) the influence of the drug and device industries on research, (iii) ghostwriting (taking credit for some...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology Vol. 30; no. S1; pp. 8 - 11 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Australia
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0815-9319 1440-1746 1440-1746 |
DOI | 10.1111/jgh.12755 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of interest might affect research, (ii) the influence of the drug and device industries on research, (iii) ghostwriting (taking credit for something you did not write), (iv) the occurrence of ethically inappropriate research and scientific misconduct, and (v) respect for the rights of research subjects. These include the rights (i) to give informed consent to participate after understanding the purposes, risks, and benefits of the research; (ii) to ask questions; and (iii) to withdraw from participation at any time. Notions of doing good (beneficence), avoiding harm (non‐maleficence), confidentiality, and, most important, the primacy of the welfare of the patient or research subject can be traced to antiquity. In the modern era, the Nuremburg Code (1947), the Declaration of Helsinki (1964), the Belmont report (1979), and other events and reports have led to the refinement of ethical practices in both clinical and research domains, have reinforced those long observed principles, and have given rise to the newer principles of autonomy and justice. The ethical conduct of research not only promotes good research but also is in the best interests of research subjects, investigators, sponsors, patients, and the public. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of interest might affect research, (ii) the influence of the drug and device industries on research, (iii) ghostwriting (taking credit for something you did not write), (iv) the occurrence of ethically inappropriate research and scientific misconduct, and (v) respect for the rights of research subjects. These include the rights (i) to give informed consent to participate after understanding the purposes, risks, and benefits of the research; (ii) to ask questions; and (iii) to withdraw from participation at any time. Notions of doing good (beneficence), avoiding harm (non-maleficence), confidentiality, and, most important, the primacy of the welfare of the patient or research subject can be traced to antiquity. In the modern era, the Nuremburg Code (1947), the Declaration of Helsinki (1964), the Belmont report (1979), and other events and reports have led to the refinement of ethical practices in both clinical and research domains, have reinforced those long observed principles, and have given rise to the newer principles of autonomy and justice. The ethical conduct of research not only promotes good research but also is in the best interests of research subjects, investigators, sponsors, patients, and the public.Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of interest might affect research, (ii) the influence of the drug and device industries on research, (iii) ghostwriting (taking credit for something you did not write), (iv) the occurrence of ethically inappropriate research and scientific misconduct, and (v) respect for the rights of research subjects. These include the rights (i) to give informed consent to participate after understanding the purposes, risks, and benefits of the research; (ii) to ask questions; and (iii) to withdraw from participation at any time. Notions of doing good (beneficence), avoiding harm (non-maleficence), confidentiality, and, most important, the primacy of the welfare of the patient or research subject can be traced to antiquity. In the modern era, the Nuremburg Code (1947), the Declaration of Helsinki (1964), the Belmont report (1979), and other events and reports have led to the refinement of ethical practices in both clinical and research domains, have reinforced those long observed principles, and have given rise to the newer principles of autonomy and justice. The ethical conduct of research not only promotes good research but also is in the best interests of research subjects, investigators, sponsors, patients, and the public. Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of interest might affect research, (ii) the influence of the drug and device industries on research, (iii) ghostwriting (taking credit for something you did not write), (iv) the occurrence of ethically inappropriate research and scientific misconduct, and (v) respect for the rights of research subjects. These include the rights (i) to give informed consent to participate after understanding the purposes, risks, and benefits of the research; (ii) to ask questions; and (iii) to withdraw from participation at any time. Notions of doing good (beneficence), avoiding harm (non-maleficence), confidentiality, and, most important, the primacy of the welfare of the patient or research subject can be traced to antiquity. In the modern era, the Nuremburg Code (1947), the Declaration of Helsinki (1964), the Belmont report (1979), and other events and reports have led to the refinement of ethical practices in both clinical and research domains, have reinforced those long observed principles, and have given rise to the newer principles of autonomy and justice. The ethical conduct of research not only promotes good research but also is in the best interests of research subjects, investigators, sponsors, patients, and the public. Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of interest might affect research, (ii) the influence of the drug and device industries on research, (iii) ghostwriting (taking credit for something you did not write), (iv) the occurrence of ethically inappropriate research and scientific misconduct, and (v) respect for the rights of research subjects. These include the rights (i) to give informed consent to participate after understanding the purposes, risks, and benefits of the research; (ii) to ask questions; and (iii) to withdraw from participation at any time. Notions of doing good (beneficence), avoiding harm (non‐maleficence), confidentiality, and, most important, the primacy of the welfare of the patient or research subject can be traced to antiquity. In the modern era, the N uremburg C ode (1947), the D eclaration of H elsinki (1964), the B elmont report (1979), and other events and reports have led to the refinement of ethical practices in both clinical and research domains, have reinforced those long observed principles, and have given rise to the newer principles of autonomy and justice. The ethical conduct of research not only promotes good research but also is in the best interests of research subjects, investigators, sponsors, patients, and the public. |
Author | Eastwood, Gregory L |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Gregory L surname: Eastwood fullname: Eastwood, Gregory L email: eastwood@upstate.edu organization: Center for Bioethics and Humanities, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, New York, Syracuse, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25827797$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kMtOwkAUhicGIxdd-AKGpcYUZzq3dqmIoCHqQmU5mU4PMFhanClR3t4il4WJns3ZfN-fc_4mquVFDgidEtwh1VzNJtMOCSXnB6hBGMMBkUzUUANHhAcxJXEdNb2fYYwZlvwI1UMehVLGsoEue-XUGp21rfdL8G2btyfal66AvARXZMVk1XbgQTszPUaHY515ONnuFnq96710B8HwqX_fvR4GhgrKA8MiHqciZGJsJAMwaYqlNhLzhHGShIRjMSYYYqAJTgUWCU1onEoNxKwp2kLnm9yFKz6qo0o1t95AlukciqVXRIiYcRqSqELPtugymUOqFs7OtVup3YMVcLEBjCu8dzDeIwSrdXmqKk_9lFexV79YY0td2iIvnbbZf8anzWD1d7R66A92RrAxrC_ha29o966EpJKr0WNfPd8M8ZDcvqkR_QZf9o20 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_03007995_2019_1608101 crossref_primary_10_1177_00258172221141304 |
Cites_doi | 10.1136/jme.2002.002113 10.1001/jama.299.15.1800 10.1038/435737a 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07133-5 10.1001/jama.300.9.1069 10.1001/jama.295.4.429 10.7326/0003-4819-139-7-200310070-00005 10.1162/15265160360706552 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd – notice: 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/jgh.12755 |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1440-1746 |
EndPage | 11 |
ExternalDocumentID | 25827797 10_1111_jgh_12755 JGH12755 ark_67375_WNG_PBL0L1DV_W |
Genre | reviewArticle Journal Article Review |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29K 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F D-I DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DTERQ DU5 EBS EJD EMOBN ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO KMS LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOQ WOW WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AAYCA ACRPL ACYXJ ADNMO AFWVQ ALVPJ AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3635-c4859d6246fc74eecdd07ac705b451b21506f10e9e3b0d606b3b39d7ae1cc7053 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0815-9319 1440-1746 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 02:13:38 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:04:56 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:45:09 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:07:03 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:41:13 EST 2025 Wed Oct 30 09:58:00 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | S1 |
Keywords | human subjects ethics research ethics bioethics conflicts of interest |
Language | English |
License | 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3635-c4859d6246fc74eecdd07ac705b451b21506f10e9e3b0d606b3b39d7ae1cc7053 |
Notes | Presented at the 15th Taishotoyama International Symposium on Gastroenterology, September 26, 2013, Tokyo, Japan. istex:CF245A2EEC0C331A0D541546935E4D2F490EFAB3 ark:/67375/WNG-PBL0L1DV-W ArticleID:JGH12755 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
PMID | 25827797 |
PQID | 1669453218 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 4 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1669453218 pubmed_primary_25827797 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_12755 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_jgh_12755 wiley_primary_10_1111_jgh_12755_JGH12755 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_PBL0L1DV_W |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-03 March 2015 2015-03-00 2015-Mar 20150301 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2015 text: 2015-03 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Australia |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Australia |
PublicationTitle | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Gastroenterol Hepatol |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
References | Nylenna M, Andersen D, Dahlquist G, Sarvas M, Aakvaag A. Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. Lancet 1999; 354: 57-61. Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 2005; 435: 737-738. Wilson EO. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1998. Ross JS, Hill KP, Egilman DS, Krumholz HM. Guest authorship and ghost-writing in publications related to rofecoxib. A case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation. JAMA 2008; 299: 1800-1812. Lisse JR, Perlman M, Johansson G et al. Gastrointestinal tolerability and effectiveness of rofecoxib vs naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2003; 139: 539-546. Rice TW. The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research. Respir. Care 2008; 53: 1325-1329. Reicher H. Medicine in the Third Reich: the 65th anniversary of the doctors' trial at Nuremberg. Penn Med 2012; 23: 28-37. Angell M. Industry-sponsored clinical research. A broken system. JAMA 2008; 300: 1069-1071. Tsai DF-C. The bioethical principles and Confucius' moral philosophy. J. Med. Ethics 2005; 31: 159-163. Brennan TA, Rothman DJ, Blank L et al. Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest. A policy proposal for academic medical centers. JAMA 2006; 295: 429-433. Katz D, Caplan AL, Merz JF. All gifts large and small. Toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving. Am. J. Bioeth. 2003; 3: 39-46. 2003; 139 2010 2005; 435 1998 2006; 295 2003; 3 2005; 31 1995 2005 2008; 53 2008; 300 1999; 354 2008; 299 2012; 23 e_1_2_5_15_1 e_1_2_5_14_1 e_1_2_5_17_1 e_1_2_5_9_1 e_1_2_5_16_1 e_1_2_5_11_1 e_1_2_5_7_1 e_1_2_5_10_1 e_1_2_5_13_1 e_1_2_5_12_1 e_1_2_5_4_1 Rice TW (e_1_2_5_5_1) 2008; 53 Kimura R (e_1_2_5_3_1) 1995 Wilson EO (e_1_2_5_8_1) 1998 Reicher H (e_1_2_5_6_1) 2012; 23 Kitagawa JM (e_1_2_5_2_1) 1995 |
References_xml | – reference: Rice TW. The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research. Respir. Care 2008; 53: 1325-1329. – reference: Angell M. Industry-sponsored clinical research. A broken system. JAMA 2008; 300: 1069-1071. – reference: Lisse JR, Perlman M, Johansson G et al. Gastrointestinal tolerability and effectiveness of rofecoxib vs naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2003; 139: 539-546. – reference: Brennan TA, Rothman DJ, Blank L et al. Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest. A policy proposal for academic medical centers. JAMA 2006; 295: 429-433. – reference: Ross JS, Hill KP, Egilman DS, Krumholz HM. Guest authorship and ghost-writing in publications related to rofecoxib. A case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation. JAMA 2008; 299: 1800-1812. – reference: Katz D, Caplan AL, Merz JF. All gifts large and small. Toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving. Am. J. Bioeth. 2003; 3: 39-46. – reference: Nylenna M, Andersen D, Dahlquist G, Sarvas M, Aakvaag A. Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. Lancet 1999; 354: 57-61. – reference: Tsai DF-C. The bioethical principles and Confucius' moral philosophy. J. Med. Ethics 2005; 31: 159-163. – reference: Reicher H. Medicine in the Third Reich: the 65th anniversary of the doctors' trial at Nuremberg. Penn Med 2012; 23: 28-37. – reference: Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 2005; 435: 737-738. – reference: Wilson EO. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1998. – volume: 3 start-page: 39 year: 2003 end-page: 46 article-title: All gifts large and small. Toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift‐giving publication-title: Am. J. Bioeth. – volume: 300 start-page: 1069 year: 2008 end-page: 1071 article-title: Industry‐sponsored clinical research. A broken system publication-title: JAMA – volume: 354 start-page: 57 year: 1999 end-page: 61 article-title: Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries publication-title: Lancet – volume: 295 start-page: 429 year: 2006 end-page: 433 article-title: Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest. A policy proposal for academic medical centers publication-title: JAMA – volume: 31 start-page: 159 year: 2005 end-page: 163 article-title: The bioethical principles and Confucius' moral philosophy publication-title: J. Med. Ethics – volume: 139 start-page: 539 year: 2003 end-page: 546 article-title: Gastrointestinal tolerability and effectiveness of rofecoxib vs naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled trial publication-title: Ann. Intern. Med. – start-page: 1491 year: 1995 end-page: 1496 – volume: 435 start-page: 737 year: 2005 end-page: 738 article-title: Scientists behaving badly publication-title: Nature – volume: 23 start-page: 28 year: 2012 end-page: 37 article-title: Medicine in the Third Reich: the 65th anniversary of the doctors' trial at Nuremberg publication-title: Penn Med – start-page: 1496 year: 1995 end-page: 1505 – volume: 53 start-page: 1325 year: 2008 end-page: 1329 article-title: The historical, ethical, and legal background of human‐subjects research publication-title: Respir. Care – year: 2005 article-title: Evidence in Vioxx suits shows intervention by Merck officials – year: 1998 – year: 2010 – volume: 299 start-page: 1800 year: 2008 end-page: 1812 article-title: Guest authorship and ghost‐writing in publications related to rofecoxib. A case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation publication-title: JAMA – ident: e_1_2_5_4_1 doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.002113 – ident: e_1_2_5_13_1 doi: 10.1001/jama.299.15.1800 – volume-title: Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_5_8_1 – ident: e_1_2_5_17_1 doi: 10.1038/435737a – ident: e_1_2_5_15_1 – ident: e_1_2_5_12_1 – start-page: 1496 volume-title: Encyclopedia of Bioethics year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_5_3_1 – ident: e_1_2_5_16_1 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07133-5 – volume: 53 start-page: 1325 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_5_5_1 article-title: The historical, ethical, and legal background of human‐subjects research publication-title: Respir. Care – start-page: 1491 volume-title: Encyclopedia of Bioethics year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_5_2_1 – ident: e_1_2_5_11_1 doi: 10.1001/jama.300.9.1069 – volume: 23 start-page: 28 year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_5_6_1 article-title: Medicine in the Third Reich: the 65th anniversary of the doctors' trial at Nuremberg publication-title: Penn Med – ident: e_1_2_5_9_1 doi: 10.1001/jama.295.4.429 – ident: e_1_2_5_14_1 doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-7-200310070-00005 – ident: e_1_2_5_10_1 doi: 10.1162/15265160360706552 – ident: e_1_2_5_7_1 |
SSID | ssj0004075 |
Score | 2.135893 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 8 |
SubjectTerms | bioethics Codes of Ethics Conflict of Interest conflicts of interest ethics Ethics, Research Gastroenterology - ethics human subjects Humans Informed Consent research ethics Research Subjects Scientific Misconduct |
Title | Ethical issues in gastroenterology research |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-PBL0L1DV-W/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjgh.12755 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25827797 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1669453218 |
Volume | 30 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3rSxwxEB8OC8UvWuvrbC3bItIve2R3k82FftJWPQ4Vkfr4IITNY-9E2ZN7QPGvN5N9WEVB_LYLk2WSyWx-ycz8ArCVOsgRpaYbskywkGbGhgpfY6FzHqcsUgYjukfHae-M9i_ZZQt-1bUwJT9Ec-CGnuH_1-jgmZr87-SDYQfZybHAHHO1EBCdPlJH0ZJk1614LBRunlWsQj6Lp275ZC36gMP67yWg-RS3-oVnfxGuapXLfJObzmyqOvr-GZvjO_v0CRYqQBrslDNoCVq2-Awfj6qQ-zKUGfFOwltoElwXwSCbTMcjJPMc-0P5oGIMGq7A2f7e39-9sLphIdSJQxqhpl0mTBpTrPih1mpjCM80J0xRZ6YY6QfziFhhE0WM2-uoRCXC8MxGGqWSVZgrRoVdhyDOcxV1iaVcIKVeLpTmeUwMJ7lNUpK34Wc91lJX9ON4C8atbLYhg6H0nW_Dj0b0ruTceElo2xuskcjGN5ikxpm8OD6QJ7uH5DD6cy4v2vC9tqh0roPxkKywo9lERmkqKEscyGnDWmnq5msx68acC-7U9gZ7XRHZP-j5h423i36BeQe8WJnL9hXmpuOZ3XTgZqq--Vn8AEa-8kI |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ZT9wwEB5RkFpegF6wHCVUVdWXrJzEjtcSL7QUtrC7qioovFRWfGQXgbJoD6nqr8fjHC0VlSreEmkcjT0z8Wd7_A3Au9RBjig1nZBlgoU0MzZU-BoLnfM4ZZEyeKLbH6Tdc3pyyS4XYL--C1PyQzQbbhgZ_n-NAY4b0n9G-XDURnpy9gSWsKI31i84_PabPIqWNLtuzmOhcJ5W8Qr5PJ666b3ZaAkH9udDUPM-cvVTz9Eq_KiVLjNOrtvzmWrrX3_xOT62V2uwUmHS4KB0ouewYIsX8LRfnbq_hDIp3kl4I02DqyIYZtPZZIx8nhO_Lx9UpEGjV3B-9PnsUzesiiyEOnFgI9S0w4RJY4qXfqi12hjCM80JU9RZKkYGwjwiVthEEeOWOypRiTA8s5FGqeQ1LBbjwm5AEOe5ijrEUi6QVS8XSvM8JoaT3CYpyVvwoR5sqSsGciyEcSOblchwJH3nW_C2Eb0taTceEnrvLdZIZJNrzFPjTF4MjuXXjz3Siw6_y4sW7NUmlS568EgkK-x4PpVRmgrKEodzWrBe2rr5Wsw6MeeCO7W9xf6tiDw57vqHzf8X3YVn3bN-T_a-DE63YNnhMFamtm3D4mwytzsO68zUG-_Sd2uf9lw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bSxwxFD5YBelLbW2rq9WOpZS-zJKZyWWDT166rrouUmr1QQiT225RZmUvUPrrTTIXa7FQ-jYDJ8NJTs6cLzknXwA-Ugc5Eqo7Mck5iXGuTSz9a8qVZSklidQ-o3s2oL0LfHJFrhZgtz4LU_JDNBtu3jPC_9o7-J22vzv5cNT27OTkGSxh6pzFI6KvD9xRuGTZdSGPxNxNtIpWKJTx1E0fBaMlP64_n0Kaj4FriDzdFbiudS4LTm7a85lsq19_0Dn-Z6dewosKkUZ75RR6BQumWIXlsyrn_hrKkngnEUw0jX4U0TCfziZjz-Y5CbvyUUUZNHoDF90v3w56cXXFQqwyBzVihTuEa5pif-QHG6O0RixXDBGJnZ1Szz9oE2S4ySTSbrEjM5lxzXKTKC-VvYXFYlyYdYhSa2XSQQYz7jn1LJeK2RRphqzJKLIt-FyPtVAV_7i_BuNWNOuQ4UiEzrfgQyN6V5JuPCX0KRiskcgnN75KjRFxOTgS5_t91E8Ov4vLFuzUFhXOd3xCJC_MeD4VCaUck8yhnBaslaZuvpaSTsoYZ07tYLC_KyJOjnrhYePfRd_D8vlhV_SPB6eb8NyBMFLWtb2DxdlkbrYc0JnJ7TCh7wGpvfUU |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethical+issues+in+gastroenterology+research&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+gastroenterology+and+hepatology&rft.au=Eastwood%2C+Gregory+L&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=11&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjgh.12755&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_jgh_12755 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0815-9319&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0815-9319&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0815-9319&client=summon |