Ethical issues in gastroenterology research

Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of interest might affect research, (ii) the influence of the drug and device industries on research, (iii) ghostwriting (taking credit for some...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology Vol. 30; no. S1; pp. 8 - 11
Main Author Eastwood, Gregory L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0815-9319
1440-1746
1440-1746
DOI10.1111/jgh.12755

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of interest might affect research, (ii) the influence of the drug and device industries on research, (iii) ghostwriting (taking credit for something you did not write), (iv) the occurrence of ethically inappropriate research and scientific misconduct, and (v) respect for the rights of research subjects. These include the rights (i) to give informed consent to participate after understanding the purposes, risks, and benefits of the research; (ii) to ask questions; and (iii) to withdraw from participation at any time. Notions of doing good (beneficence), avoiding harm (non‐maleficence), confidentiality, and, most important, the primacy of the welfare of the patient or research subject can be traced to antiquity. In the modern era, the Nuremburg Code (1947), the Declaration of Helsinki (1964), the Belmont report (1979), and other events and reports have led to the refinement of ethical practices in both clinical and research domains, have reinforced those long observed principles, and have given rise to the newer principles of autonomy and justice. The ethical conduct of research not only promotes good research but also is in the best interests of research subjects, investigators, sponsors, patients, and the public.
AbstractList Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of interest might affect research, (ii) the influence of the drug and device industries on research, (iii) ghostwriting (taking credit for something you did not write), (iv) the occurrence of ethically inappropriate research and scientific misconduct, and (v) respect for the rights of research subjects. These include the rights (i) to give informed consent to participate after understanding the purposes, risks, and benefits of the research; (ii) to ask questions; and (iii) to withdraw from participation at any time. Notions of doing good (beneficence), avoiding harm (non-maleficence), confidentiality, and, most important, the primacy of the welfare of the patient or research subject can be traced to antiquity. In the modern era, the Nuremburg Code (1947), the Declaration of Helsinki (1964), the Belmont report (1979), and other events and reports have led to the refinement of ethical practices in both clinical and research domains, have reinforced those long observed principles, and have given rise to the newer principles of autonomy and justice. The ethical conduct of research not only promotes good research but also is in the best interests of research subjects, investigators, sponsors, patients, and the public.Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of interest might affect research, (ii) the influence of the drug and device industries on research, (iii) ghostwriting (taking credit for something you did not write), (iv) the occurrence of ethically inappropriate research and scientific misconduct, and (v) respect for the rights of research subjects. These include the rights (i) to give informed consent to participate after understanding the purposes, risks, and benefits of the research; (ii) to ask questions; and (iii) to withdraw from participation at any time. Notions of doing good (beneficence), avoiding harm (non-maleficence), confidentiality, and, most important, the primacy of the welfare of the patient or research subject can be traced to antiquity. In the modern era, the Nuremburg Code (1947), the Declaration of Helsinki (1964), the Belmont report (1979), and other events and reports have led to the refinement of ethical practices in both clinical and research domains, have reinforced those long observed principles, and have given rise to the newer principles of autonomy and justice. The ethical conduct of research not only promotes good research but also is in the best interests of research subjects, investigators, sponsors, patients, and the public.
Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of interest might affect research, (ii) the influence of the drug and device industries on research, (iii) ghostwriting (taking credit for something you did not write), (iv) the occurrence of ethically inappropriate research and scientific misconduct, and (v) respect for the rights of research subjects. These include the rights (i) to give informed consent to participate after understanding the purposes, risks, and benefits of the research; (ii) to ask questions; and (iii) to withdraw from participation at any time. Notions of doing good (beneficence), avoiding harm (non-maleficence), confidentiality, and, most important, the primacy of the welfare of the patient or research subject can be traced to antiquity. In the modern era, the Nuremburg Code (1947), the Declaration of Helsinki (1964), the Belmont report (1979), and other events and reports have led to the refinement of ethical practices in both clinical and research domains, have reinforced those long observed principles, and have given rise to the newer principles of autonomy and justice. The ethical conduct of research not only promotes good research but also is in the best interests of research subjects, investigators, sponsors, patients, and the public.
Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of interest might affect research, (ii) the influence of the drug and device industries on research, (iii) ghostwriting (taking credit for something you did not write), (iv) the occurrence of ethically inappropriate research and scientific misconduct, and (v) respect for the rights of research subjects. These include the rights (i) to give informed consent to participate after understanding the purposes, risks, and benefits of the research; (ii) to ask questions; and (iii) to withdraw from participation at any time. Notions of doing good (beneficence), avoiding harm (non‐maleficence), confidentiality, and, most important, the primacy of the welfare of the patient or research subject can be traced to antiquity. In the modern era, the N uremburg C ode (1947), the D eclaration of H elsinki (1964), the B elmont report (1979), and other events and reports have led to the refinement of ethical practices in both clinical and research domains, have reinforced those long observed principles, and have given rise to the newer principles of autonomy and justice. The ethical conduct of research not only promotes good research but also is in the best interests of research subjects, investigators, sponsors, patients, and the public.
Author Eastwood, Gregory L
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Gregory L
  surname: Eastwood
  fullname: Eastwood, Gregory L
  email: eastwood@upstate.edu
  organization: Center for Bioethics and Humanities, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, New York, Syracuse, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25827797$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kMtOwkAUhicGIxdd-AKGpcYUZzq3dqmIoCHqQmU5mU4PMFhanClR3t4il4WJns3ZfN-fc_4mquVFDgidEtwh1VzNJtMOCSXnB6hBGMMBkUzUUANHhAcxJXEdNb2fYYwZlvwI1UMehVLGsoEue-XUGp21rfdL8G2btyfal66AvARXZMVk1XbgQTszPUaHY515ONnuFnq96710B8HwqX_fvR4GhgrKA8MiHqciZGJsJAMwaYqlNhLzhHGShIRjMSYYYqAJTgUWCU1onEoNxKwp2kLnm9yFKz6qo0o1t95AlukciqVXRIiYcRqSqELPtugymUOqFs7OtVup3YMVcLEBjCu8dzDeIwSrdXmqKk_9lFexV79YY0td2iIvnbbZf8anzWD1d7R66A92RrAxrC_ha29o966EpJKr0WNfPd8M8ZDcvqkR_QZf9o20
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_03007995_2019_1608101
crossref_primary_10_1177_00258172221141304
Cites_doi 10.1136/jme.2002.002113
10.1001/jama.299.15.1800
10.1038/435737a
10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07133-5
10.1001/jama.300.9.1069
10.1001/jama.295.4.429
10.7326/0003-4819-139-7-200310070-00005
10.1162/15265160360706552
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
– notice: 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1111/jgh.12755
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE

CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1440-1746
EndPage 11
ExternalDocumentID 25827797
10_1111_jgh_12755
JGH12755
ark_67375_WNG_PBL0L1DV_W
Genre reviewArticle
Journal Article
Review
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29K
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
D-I
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DTERQ
DU5
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
KMS
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOQ
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANHP
AAYCA
ACRPL
ACYXJ
ADNMO
AFWVQ
ALVPJ
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3635-c4859d6246fc74eecdd07ac705b451b21506f10e9e3b0d606b3b39d7ae1cc7053
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0815-9319
1440-1746
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 02:13:38 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:04:56 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:45:09 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:07:03 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:41:13 EST 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:58:00 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue S1
Keywords human subjects
ethics
research ethics
bioethics
conflicts of interest
Language English
License 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3635-c4859d6246fc74eecdd07ac705b451b21506f10e9e3b0d606b3b39d7ae1cc7053
Notes Presented at the 15th Taishotoyama International Symposium on Gastroenterology, September 26, 2013, Tokyo, Japan.
istex:CF245A2EEC0C331A0D541546935E4D2F490EFAB3
ark:/67375/WNG-PBL0L1DV-W
ArticleID:JGH12755
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
PMID 25827797
PQID 1669453218
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1669453218
pubmed_primary_25827797
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_12755
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_jgh_12755
wiley_primary_10_1111_jgh_12755_JGH12755
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_PBL0L1DV_W
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-03
March 2015
2015-03-00
2015-Mar
20150301
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-03
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Australia
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Australia
PublicationTitle Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Gastroenterol Hepatol
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References Nylenna M, Andersen D, Dahlquist G, Sarvas M, Aakvaag A. Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. Lancet 1999; 354: 57-61.
Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 2005; 435: 737-738.
Wilson EO. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1998.
Ross JS, Hill KP, Egilman DS, Krumholz HM. Guest authorship and ghost-writing in publications related to rofecoxib. A case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation. JAMA 2008; 299: 1800-1812.
Lisse JR, Perlman M, Johansson G et al. Gastrointestinal tolerability and effectiveness of rofecoxib vs naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2003; 139: 539-546.
Rice TW. The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research. Respir. Care 2008; 53: 1325-1329.
Reicher H. Medicine in the Third Reich: the 65th anniversary of the doctors' trial at Nuremberg. Penn Med 2012; 23: 28-37.
Angell M. Industry-sponsored clinical research. A broken system. JAMA 2008; 300: 1069-1071.
Tsai DF-C. The bioethical principles and Confucius' moral philosophy. J. Med. Ethics 2005; 31: 159-163.
Brennan TA, Rothman DJ, Blank L et al. Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest. A policy proposal for academic medical centers. JAMA 2006; 295: 429-433.
Katz D, Caplan AL, Merz JF. All gifts large and small. Toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving. Am. J. Bioeth. 2003; 3: 39-46.
2003; 139
2010
2005; 435
1998
2006; 295
2003; 3
2005; 31
1995
2005
2008; 53
2008; 300
1999; 354
2008; 299
2012; 23
e_1_2_5_15_1
e_1_2_5_14_1
e_1_2_5_17_1
e_1_2_5_9_1
e_1_2_5_16_1
e_1_2_5_11_1
e_1_2_5_7_1
e_1_2_5_10_1
e_1_2_5_13_1
e_1_2_5_12_1
e_1_2_5_4_1
Rice TW (e_1_2_5_5_1) 2008; 53
Kimura R (e_1_2_5_3_1) 1995
Wilson EO (e_1_2_5_8_1) 1998
Reicher H (e_1_2_5_6_1) 2012; 23
Kitagawa JM (e_1_2_5_2_1) 1995
References_xml – reference: Rice TW. The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research. Respir. Care 2008; 53: 1325-1329.
– reference: Angell M. Industry-sponsored clinical research. A broken system. JAMA 2008; 300: 1069-1071.
– reference: Lisse JR, Perlman M, Johansson G et al. Gastrointestinal tolerability and effectiveness of rofecoxib vs naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2003; 139: 539-546.
– reference: Brennan TA, Rothman DJ, Blank L et al. Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest. A policy proposal for academic medical centers. JAMA 2006; 295: 429-433.
– reference: Ross JS, Hill KP, Egilman DS, Krumholz HM. Guest authorship and ghost-writing in publications related to rofecoxib. A case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation. JAMA 2008; 299: 1800-1812.
– reference: Katz D, Caplan AL, Merz JF. All gifts large and small. Toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving. Am. J. Bioeth. 2003; 3: 39-46.
– reference: Nylenna M, Andersen D, Dahlquist G, Sarvas M, Aakvaag A. Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. Lancet 1999; 354: 57-61.
– reference: Tsai DF-C. The bioethical principles and Confucius' moral philosophy. J. Med. Ethics 2005; 31: 159-163.
– reference: Reicher H. Medicine in the Third Reich: the 65th anniversary of the doctors' trial at Nuremberg. Penn Med 2012; 23: 28-37.
– reference: Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 2005; 435: 737-738.
– reference: Wilson EO. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1998.
– volume: 3
  start-page: 39
  year: 2003
  end-page: 46
  article-title: All gifts large and small. Toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift‐giving
  publication-title: Am. J. Bioeth.
– volume: 300
  start-page: 1069
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1071
  article-title: Industry‐sponsored clinical research. A broken system
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 354
  start-page: 57
  year: 1999
  end-page: 61
  article-title: Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 295
  start-page: 429
  year: 2006
  end-page: 433
  article-title: Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest. A policy proposal for academic medical centers
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 31
  start-page: 159
  year: 2005
  end-page: 163
  article-title: The bioethical principles and Confucius' moral philosophy
  publication-title: J. Med. Ethics
– volume: 139
  start-page: 539
  year: 2003
  end-page: 546
  article-title: Gastrointestinal tolerability and effectiveness of rofecoxib vs naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled trial
  publication-title: Ann. Intern. Med.
– start-page: 1491
  year: 1995
  end-page: 1496
– volume: 435
  start-page: 737
  year: 2005
  end-page: 738
  article-title: Scientists behaving badly
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 23
  start-page: 28
  year: 2012
  end-page: 37
  article-title: Medicine in the Third Reich: the 65th anniversary of the doctors' trial at Nuremberg
  publication-title: Penn Med
– start-page: 1496
  year: 1995
  end-page: 1505
– volume: 53
  start-page: 1325
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1329
  article-title: The historical, ethical, and legal background of human‐subjects research
  publication-title: Respir. Care
– year: 2005
  article-title: Evidence in Vioxx suits shows intervention by Merck officials
– year: 1998
– year: 2010
– volume: 299
  start-page: 1800
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1812
  article-title: Guest authorship and ghost‐writing in publications related to rofecoxib. A case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation
  publication-title: JAMA
– ident: e_1_2_5_4_1
  doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.002113
– ident: e_1_2_5_13_1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.299.15.1800
– volume-title: Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_5_8_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_17_1
  doi: 10.1038/435737a
– ident: e_1_2_5_15_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_12_1
– start-page: 1496
  volume-title: Encyclopedia of Bioethics
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_5_3_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07133-5
– volume: 53
  start-page: 1325
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_5_5_1
  article-title: The historical, ethical, and legal background of human‐subjects research
  publication-title: Respir. Care
– start-page: 1491
  volume-title: Encyclopedia of Bioethics
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_5_2_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_11_1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.300.9.1069
– volume: 23
  start-page: 28
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_5_6_1
  article-title: Medicine in the Third Reich: the 65th anniversary of the doctors' trial at Nuremberg
  publication-title: Penn Med
– ident: e_1_2_5_9_1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.295.4.429
– ident: e_1_2_5_14_1
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-7-200310070-00005
– ident: e_1_2_5_10_1
  doi: 10.1162/15265160360706552
– ident: e_1_2_5_7_1
SSID ssj0004075
Score 2.135893
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Ethical issues have become increasingly important in gastroenterology research. This is for several reasons, including (i) an understanding of how conflicts of...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 8
SubjectTerms bioethics
Codes of Ethics
Conflict of Interest
conflicts of interest
ethics
Ethics, Research
Gastroenterology - ethics
human subjects
Humans
Informed Consent
research ethics
Research Subjects
Scientific Misconduct
Title Ethical issues in gastroenterology research
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-PBL0L1DV-W/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjgh.12755
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25827797
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1669453218
Volume 30
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3rSxwxEB8OC8UvWuvrbC3bItIve2R3k82FftJWPQ4Vkfr4IITNY-9E2ZN7QPGvN5N9WEVB_LYLk2WSyWx-ycz8ArCVOsgRpaYbskywkGbGhgpfY6FzHqcsUgYjukfHae-M9i_ZZQt-1bUwJT9Ec-CGnuH_1-jgmZr87-SDYQfZybHAHHO1EBCdPlJH0ZJk1614LBRunlWsQj6Lp275ZC36gMP67yWg-RS3-oVnfxGuapXLfJObzmyqOvr-GZvjO_v0CRYqQBrslDNoCVq2-Awfj6qQ-zKUGfFOwltoElwXwSCbTMcjJPMc-0P5oGIMGq7A2f7e39-9sLphIdSJQxqhpl0mTBpTrPih1mpjCM80J0xRZ6YY6QfziFhhE0WM2-uoRCXC8MxGGqWSVZgrRoVdhyDOcxV1iaVcIKVeLpTmeUwMJ7lNUpK34Wc91lJX9ON4C8atbLYhg6H0nW_Dj0b0ruTceElo2xuskcjGN5ikxpm8OD6QJ7uH5DD6cy4v2vC9tqh0roPxkKywo9lERmkqKEscyGnDWmnq5msx68acC-7U9gZ7XRHZP-j5h423i36BeQe8WJnL9hXmpuOZ3XTgZqq--Vn8AEa-8kI
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ZT9wwEB5RkFpegF6wHCVUVdWXrJzEjtcSL7QUtrC7qioovFRWfGQXgbJoD6nqr8fjHC0VlSreEmkcjT0z8Wd7_A3Au9RBjig1nZBlgoU0MzZU-BoLnfM4ZZEyeKLbH6Tdc3pyyS4XYL--C1PyQzQbbhgZ_n-NAY4b0n9G-XDURnpy9gSWsKI31i84_PabPIqWNLtuzmOhcJ5W8Qr5PJ666b3ZaAkH9udDUPM-cvVTz9Eq_KiVLjNOrtvzmWrrX3_xOT62V2uwUmHS4KB0ouewYIsX8LRfnbq_hDIp3kl4I02DqyIYZtPZZIx8nhO_Lx9UpEGjV3B-9PnsUzesiiyEOnFgI9S0w4RJY4qXfqi12hjCM80JU9RZKkYGwjwiVthEEeOWOypRiTA8s5FGqeQ1LBbjwm5AEOe5ijrEUi6QVS8XSvM8JoaT3CYpyVvwoR5sqSsGciyEcSOblchwJH3nW_C2Eb0taTceEnrvLdZIZJNrzFPjTF4MjuXXjz3Siw6_y4sW7NUmlS568EgkK-x4PpVRmgrKEodzWrBe2rr5Wsw6MeeCO7W9xf6tiDw57vqHzf8X3YVn3bN-T_a-DE63YNnhMFamtm3D4mwytzsO68zUG-_Sd2uf9lw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bSxwxFD5YBelLbW2rq9WOpZS-zJKZyWWDT166rrouUmr1QQiT225RZmUvUPrrTTIXa7FQ-jYDJ8NJTs6cLzknXwA-Ugc5Eqo7Mck5iXGuTSz9a8qVZSklidQ-o3s2oL0LfHJFrhZgtz4LU_JDNBtu3jPC_9o7-J22vzv5cNT27OTkGSxh6pzFI6KvD9xRuGTZdSGPxNxNtIpWKJTx1E0fBaMlP64_n0Kaj4FriDzdFbiudS4LTm7a85lsq19_0Dn-Z6dewosKkUZ75RR6BQumWIXlsyrn_hrKkngnEUw0jX4U0TCfziZjz-Y5CbvyUUUZNHoDF90v3w56cXXFQqwyBzVihTuEa5pif-QHG6O0RixXDBGJnZ1Szz9oE2S4ySTSbrEjM5lxzXKTKC-VvYXFYlyYdYhSa2XSQQYz7jn1LJeK2RRphqzJKLIt-FyPtVAV_7i_BuNWNOuQ4UiEzrfgQyN6V5JuPCX0KRiskcgnN75KjRFxOTgS5_t91E8Ov4vLFuzUFhXOd3xCJC_MeD4VCaUck8yhnBaslaZuvpaSTsoYZ07tYLC_KyJOjnrhYePfRd_D8vlhV_SPB6eb8NyBMFLWtb2DxdlkbrYc0JnJ7TCh7wGpvfUU
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethical+issues+in+gastroenterology+research&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+gastroenterology+and+hepatology&rft.au=Eastwood%2C+Gregory+L&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=11&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjgh.12755&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_jgh_12755
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0815-9319&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0815-9319&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0815-9319&client=summon