Comparison of Laboratory‐Based and Home‐Based Tests of Consumer Preferences Using Kid and Lamb Meat
The meat from 60 commercial suckling males of five Spanish goat breeds (n = 10 each) (Moncaína [MO], Pirenaica [PI], Negra Serrana [NS], Blanca Celtibérica [BC] [all meat or double purpose] and Murciano‐Granadina [MG] [dairy purpose]) and one dairy sheep breed (Churra [CH]) was compared in laborator...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of sensory studies Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 201 - 210 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Cincinnati
Food & Nutrition Press
01.06.2014
Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | The meat from 60 commercial suckling males of five Spanish goat breeds (n = 10 each) (Moncaína [MO], Pirenaica [PI], Negra Serrana [NS], Blanca Celtibérica [BC] [all meat or double purpose] and Murciano‐Granadina [MG] [dairy purpose]) and one dairy sheep breed (Churra [CH]) was compared in laboratory‐based (n = 119) and home‐based (n = 70) consumer tests. In the laboratory, flavor (P ≤ 0.01), tenderness (P ≤ 0.001) and overall acceptability (P ≤ 0.001) differed significantly among the breeds, and MO, NS, MG and CH had the highest overall acceptability. In the home‐based test, tenderness (P ≤ 0.01) and overall acceptability (P ≤ 0.05), but not flavor, differed significantly among the breeds, and MO, BC, MG and CH had the highest overall acceptability. In conclusion, the two consumer test evaluated were adequate for evaluating meat acceptability from suckling small ruminants, having comparable results, although consumer preferences were slightly higher and signification levels slightly lower under home conditions than under laboratory conditions. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Consumer acceptance is a big aim of any food sector. Meat is a complex product to be evaluated because of its intrinsic variability and because it needs to be cooked previously to be assessed. Comparisons with the same animals, in different circumstances: cut, type of cooking and temperature, condiments, ambiance, as it occurs in home tests or laboratory tests hardly exist. In this paper, the same results have been obtained in both tests with meat from small ruminants. This will undoubtedly favor the development of meat consumer tests in the future. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The meat from 60 commercial suckling males of five Spanish goat breeds (n=10 each) (Moncaína [MO], Pirenaica [PI], Negra Serrana [NS], Blanca Celtibérica [BC] [all meat or double purpose] and Murciano-Granadina [MG] [dairy purpose]) and one dairy sheep breed (Churra [CH]) was compared in laboratory-based (n=119) and home-based (n=70) consumer tests. In the laboratory, flavor (P≤0.01), tenderness (P≤0.001) and overall acceptability (P≤0.001) differed significantly among the breeds, and MO, NS, MG and CH had the highest overall acceptability. In the home-based test, tenderness (P≤0.01) and overall acceptability (P≤0.05), but not flavor, differed significantly among the breeds, and MO, BC, MG and CH had the highest overall acceptability. In conclusion, the two consumer test evaluated were adequate for evaluating meat acceptability from suckling small ruminants, having comparable results, although consumer preferences were slightly higher and signification levels slightly lower under home conditions than under laboratory conditions. Practical Applications Consumer acceptance is a big aim of any food sector. Meat is a complex product to be evaluated because of its intrinsic variability and because it needs to be cooked previously to be assessed. Comparisons with the same animals, in different circumstances: cut, type of cooking and temperature, condiments, ambiance, as it occurs in home tests or laboratory tests hardly exist. In this paper, the same results have been obtained in both tests with meat from small ruminants. This will undoubtedly favor the development of meat consumer tests in the future. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] The meat from 60 commercial suckling males of five Spanish goat breeds (n = 10 each) (Moncaína [MO], Pirenaica [PI], Negra Serrana [NS], Blanca Celtibérica [BC] [all meat or double purpose] and Murciano‐Granadina [MG] [dairy purpose]) and one dairy sheep breed (Churra [CH]) was compared in laboratory‐based (n = 119) and home‐based (n = 70) consumer tests. In the laboratory, flavor (P ≤ 0.01), tenderness (P ≤ 0.001) and overall acceptability (P ≤ 0.001) differed significantly among the breeds, and MO, NS, MG and CH had the highest overall acceptability. In the home‐based test, tenderness (P ≤ 0.01) and overall acceptability (P ≤ 0.05), but not flavor, differed significantly among the breeds, and MO, BC, MG and CH had the highest overall acceptability. In conclusion, the two consumer test evaluated were adequate for evaluating meat acceptability from suckling small ruminants, having comparable results, although consumer preferences were slightly higher and signification levels slightly lower under home conditions than under laboratory conditions. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Consumer acceptance is a big aim of any food sector. Meat is a complex product to be evaluated because of its intrinsic variability and because it needs to be cooked previously to be assessed. Comparisons with the same animals, in different circumstances: cut, type of cooking and temperature, condiments, ambiance, as it occurs in home tests or laboratory tests hardly exist. In this paper, the same results have been obtained in both tests with meat from small ruminants. This will undoubtedly favor the development of meat consumer tests in the future. The meat from 60 commercial suckling males of five Spanish goat breeds (n = 10 each) (Moncaína [MO], Pirenaica [PI], Negra Serrana [NS], Blanca Celtibérica [BC] [all meat or double purpose] and Murciano‐Granadina [MG] [dairy purpose]) and one dairy sheep breed (Churra [CH]) was compared in laboratory‐based (n = 119) and home‐based (n = 70) consumer tests. In the laboratory, flavor (P ≤ 0.01), tenderness (P ≤ 0.001) and overall acceptability (P ≤ 0.001) differed significantly among the breeds, and MO, NS, MG and CH had the highest overall acceptability. In the home‐based test, tenderness (P ≤ 0.01) and overall acceptability (P ≤ 0.05), but not flavor, differed significantly among the breeds, and MO, BC, MG and CH had the highest overall acceptability. In conclusion, the two consumer test evaluated were adequate for evaluating meat acceptability from suckling small ruminants, having comparable results, although consumer preferences were slightly higher and signification levels slightly lower under home conditions than under laboratory conditions. Practical Applications Consumer acceptance is a big aim of any food sector. Meat is a complex product to be evaluated because of its intrinsic variability and because it needs to be cooked previously to be assessed. Comparisons with the same animals, in different circumstances: cut, type of cooking and temperature, condiments, ambiance, as it occurs in home tests or laboratory tests hardly exist. In this paper, the same results have been obtained in both tests with meat from small ruminants. This will undoubtedly favor the development of meat consumer tests in the future. Abstract The meat from 60 commercial suckling males of five S panish goat breeds ( n = 10 each) ( M oncaína [ MO ], P irenaica [ PI ], N egra S errana [ NS ], B lanca C eltibérica [ BC ] [all meat or double purpose] and M urciano‐ G ranadina [ MG ] [dairy purpose]) and one dairy sheep breed ( C hurra [ CH ]) was compared in laboratory‐based ( n = 119) and home‐based ( n = 70) consumer tests. In the laboratory, flavor ( P ≤ 0.01), tenderness ( P ≤ 0.001) and overall acceptability ( P ≤ 0.001) differed significantly among the breeds, and MO , NS , MG and CH had the highest overall acceptability. In the home‐based test, tenderness ( P ≤ 0.01) and overall acceptability ( P ≤ 0.05), but not flavor, differed significantly among the breeds, and MO , BC , MG and CH had the highest overall acceptability. In conclusion, the two consumer test evaluated were adequate for evaluating meat acceptability from suckling small ruminants, having comparable results, although consumer preferences were slightly higher and signification levels slightly lower under home conditions than under laboratory conditions. Practical Applications Consumer acceptance is a big aim of any food sector. Meat is a complex product to be evaluated because of its intrinsic variability and because it needs to be cooked previously to be assessed. Comparisons with the same animals, in different circumstances: cut, type of cooking and temperature, condiments, ambiance, as it occurs in home tests or laboratory tests hardly exist. In this paper, the same results have been obtained in both tests with meat from small ruminants. This will undoubtedly favor the development of meat consumer tests in the future. |
| Author | Campo, M.M. Horcada, A. Olleta, J.L. Cilla, I. Sañudo, C. Alcalde, M.J. Guerrero, A. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Guerrero, A – sequence: 2 fullname: Campo, M.M – sequence: 3 fullname: Cilla, I – sequence: 4 fullname: Olleta, J.L – sequence: 5 fullname: Alcalde, M.J – sequence: 6 fullname: Horcada, A – sequence: 7 fullname: Sañudo, C |
| BookMark | eNp9kc1O20AQx1dVkJqEXvoCtcStktOd_fDaRxpI-EhL1RC1t9XYXkcO2Bt2E0FuPEKfkSdhg4Fj5zLS6Pefj_8MSK-1rSHkM9ARhPi2st6PgNFMfiB9UELGQmZ_e6RP01TFKZP0Ixl4v6KUppkSfbIc22aNrva2jWwVzTC3DjfW7Z4e_31Hb8oI2zI6s415L1wbv_F7eGxbv22Mi345Uxln2sL4aOHrdhld1p1whk0e_TC4OSQHFd568-k1D8licno9PotnV9Pz8fEsLnjCZcxMmZZlaiqWqgSFyvJciBxRgQBWIfAsL0QaLuUi4aU0RQmoBNC8ZMA5ZXxIjrq-a2fvtmFTvbJb14aRGiSHjEkJNFBfO6pwwbCwvV67ukG300D13ki9N1K_GBlg6OD7-tbs_kPqi6v5_E0Td5rab8zDuwbdjU4UV1L_-TnVUw4JuziZ6N-B_9LxFVqNy_APvZgzCoJSoEpkij8DGt6Q0w |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_meatsci_2020_108312 crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_7340495 crossref_primary_10_56083_RCV3N11_221 crossref_primary_10_1071_AN15306 crossref_primary_10_1080_87559129_2021_1939369 crossref_primary_10_1111_joss_12185 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0160535 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2019_125560 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13142383 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani10061105 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijfs_14484 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_132680 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfp_2022_100025 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods7060089 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10124423 crossref_primary_10_1111_joss_12467 crossref_primary_10_1111_joss_12169 crossref_primary_10_1111_joss_12444 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.07.001 10.2527/jas.2012-5424 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1989.tb00463.x 10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00183-4 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.018 10.1016/0309-1740(94)90034-5 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2008.00181.x 10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00023-0 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00283-8 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.05.009 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.09.009 10.1071/EA07131 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.11.002 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.011 10.1016/j.jfca.2013.05.010 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.04.004 10.1111/joss.12025 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.11.013 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00035-4 10.5424/sjar/2012104-2659 10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.06.003 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00021-4 10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00073-4 10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00016-9 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.08.010 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00126-2 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.03.008 10.1016/0309-1740(93)90084-U 10.22358/jafs/66300/2010 10.1017/S1357729800053339 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2009.00257.x 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.08.011 10.1071/EA07189 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60629-2 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.12.065 10.1016/j.appet.2003.06.002 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2000.tb00280.x 10.5424/sjar/2012103-670-11 10.1016/S0921-4488(97)00087-4 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1974.tb07338.x 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.015 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Copyright © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc |
| DBID | FBQ BSCLL AAYXX CITATION 7QR 7TK 8FD FR3 P64 |
| DOI | 10.1111/joss.12095 |
| DatabaseName | AGRIS Istex CrossRef Chemoreception Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Chemoreception Abstracts Engineering Research Database Technology Research Database Neurosciences Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitleList | Chemoreception Abstracts CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: FBQ name: AGRIS url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN sourceTypes: Publisher |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Economics Diet & Clinical Nutrition |
| EISSN | 1745-459X |
| EndPage | 210 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 3323733001 10_1111_joss_12095 JOSS12095 ark_67375_WNG_G3162JDF_R US201400107497 |
| Genre | article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Project CICYT funderid: AGL2005‐0577‐C02‐01/GAN |
| GroupedDBID | .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29L 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 A8Z AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAIKC AAMNW AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABHUG ABIVO ABPTK ABPVW ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACIWK ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXME ACXQS ADAWD ADBBV ADDAD ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFVGU AFZJQ AGJLS AHEFC AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 CAG COF CS3 D-E D-F DC6 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DROCM DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD ESTFP ESX F00 F01 F04 F5P FBQ FEDTE FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HVGLF HZI HZ~ I-F IX1 J0M LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- P2P P2W P2X P4D PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TUS UB1 UCJ W8V W99 WBFHL WBKPD WIH WIK WOHZO WQJ WRC WXSBR WYISQ XG1 Y6R ZZTAW ~IA ~KM ~WT AHBTC BSCLL AAHBH AITYG HGLYW OIG AAYXX CITATION 7QR 7TK 8FD FR3 P64 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3635-2ed8dd8ef2876a479bb44baa71412fa139bc481113463d5ecd1a7410bd2133023 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 0887-8250 |
| IngestDate | Sat Aug 31 00:00:03 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 02:21:23 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:58:09 EDT 2024 Wed Jan 17 05:02:13 EST 2024 Wed Dec 27 19:06:43 EST 2023 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3635-2ed8dd8ef2876a479bb44baa71412fa139bc481113463d5ecd1a7410bd2133023 |
| Notes | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joss.12095 ArticleID:JOSS12095 Project CICYT - No. AGL2005-0577-C02-01/GAN istex:F12AC73F9EEE0C83F117468EB0B7578C5FCE0D6D ark:/67375/WNG-G3162JDF-R |
| PQID | 1531925510 |
| PQPubID | 1016366 |
| PageCount | 10 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_1531925510 crossref_primary_10_1111_joss_12095 wiley_primary_10_1111_joss_12095_JOSS12095 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_G3162JDF_R fao_agris_US201400107497 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | June 2014 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-06-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2014 text: June 2014 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Cincinnati |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Cincinnati |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of sensory studies |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Sens Stud |
| PublicationYear | 2014 |
| Publisher | Food & Nutrition Press Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Food & Nutrition Press – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | Macfie, H.J., Bratchell, N., Greenhoff, K. and Vallis, L.V. 1989. Designs to balance the effect of order presentation and first-order and carry over effects in hall test. J. Sensory Studies 4, 129-148. Ripoll, G., Alcalde, M.J., Horcada, A., Campo, M.M., Sañudo, C., Teixeira, A. and Panea, B. 2012. Effect of slaughter weight and breed on instrumental and sensory meat quality of suckling kids. Meat Sci. 92, 62-70. Amerine, M.A., Pangborn, R.M. and Roessler, E.B. 1965. Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food, Academic Press, London. Sosa, M., Martinez, C., Marquez, F. and Hough, G. 2008. Location and scale influence on sensory acceptability measurements among low-income consumers. J. Sensory Studies 23, 707-719. Veramendi, M., Herencia, P. and Ares, G. 2013. Perfume odor categorization: To what extent trained assessors and consumers agree? J. Sensory Studies 28, 76-89. Madruga, M.S., Elmore, J.S., Dodson, A.T. and Mottram, D.S. 2009. Volatile flavor profile of goat meat extracted by three widely used techniques. Food Chem. 115, 1081-1087. Thompson, J. 2002. Managing meat tenderness. Meat Sci. 62, 295-308. Sañudo, C., Campo, M.M., Muela, E., Olleta, J.L., Delfa, R., Jiménez-Badillo, R., Alcalde, M.J., Horcada, A., Oliveira, I. and Cilla, I. 2012. Carcass characteristics and instrumental meat quality of suckling kids and lambs. Span. J. Agric. Res. 10, 690-700. Sañudo, C., Muela, E. and Campo, M.M. 2013. Key factors involved in lamb quality from farm to fork in Europe. J. Integr. Agric. 12, 1919-1930. Madruga, M.S., Elmore, J.S., Oruna-Concha, M.J., Balagiannis, D. and Mottram, D.S. 2010. Determination of some water-soluble aroma precursors in goat meat and their enrolment on flavour profile of goat meat. Food Chem. 123, 513-520. Ekiz, B., Ozcan, B., Yilmaz, A., Tolu, C. and Savas, T. 2010. Carcass quality characteristics of hair goat and Saanen x hair goat crossbred kids from intensive production systems. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 19, 368-378. Rhee, K.S., Myers, C.E. and Waldron, D.F. 2003. Consumer sensory evaluation of plain and seasoned goat meat and beef products. Meat Sci. 65, 785-789. Panea, B., Ripoll, G., Horcada, A., Sañudo, C., Teixeira, A. and Alcalde, M.J. 2012. Influence of breed, milk diet and slaughter weight on carcass traits of suckling kids from seven Spanish breeds. Span. J. Agric. Res. 10, 1025-1036. Sveinsdóttir, K., Martinsdóttir, E., Thórsdóttir, F., Schelvis, R., Kole, A. and Thórsdóttir, I. 2010. Evaluation on farmed cod products by a trained sensory panel and consumers in different test setting. J. Sensory Studies 25, 280-293. Carlucci, A., Girolami, A., Napolitano, F. and Monteleone, E. 1998. Sensory evaluation of young goat meat. Meat Sci. 50, 131-136. Schönfeldt, H.C., Naudé, R.T., Bok, W., Van Heerden, S.M. and Smit, R. 1993. Flavor and tenderness related quality characteristics of goat and sheep meat. Meat Sci. 34, 363-379. Dransfield, E., Martin, J.F., Fisher, A., Nute, G.R., Zygyiannis, D., Stamataris, C., Thorkelsson, G., Valdimarsdóttir, T., Plasentier, E., Mills, C. et al. 2000. Home placement testing of lamb conducted in six countries. J. Sensory Studies 15, 421-436. Reverdy, C., Schlich, P., Köster, E.P., Ginon, E. and Lange, C. 2010. Effect of sensory education on food preferences in children. Food Qual. Prefer. 21, 794-804. Sañudo, C., Alfonso, M., San Julián, R., Thorkelsson, G., Valdimarsdottir, T., Zygoyiannis, D., Stamataris, C., Piasentier, E., Mills, C., Berge, P. et al. 2007. Regional variation in the hedonic evaluation of lamb meat from diverse production systems by consumers in six European countries. Meat Sci. 75, 610-621. Miguélez, E., Zumalacárregui, J.M., Osorio, M.T., Beteta, O. and Mateo, J. 2006. Carcass characteristics of suckling lambs protected by the PGI "Lechazo de Castilla y León" European quality label: Effect of breed, sex and carcass weight. Meat Sci. 73, 82-89. Risvik, E. 1994. Sensory properties and preferences. Meat Sci. 36, 67-77. Sheridan, R., Hoffman, L.C. and Ferreira, A.V. 2003. Meat quality of Boer goat kids and Mutton Merino lambs 2. Sensory meat evaluation. Anim. Sci. 76, 73-79. Swan, J.E., Esguerra, C.M. and Farouk, M.M. 1998. Some physical, chemical and sensory properties of chevron products from three New Zealand goat breeds. Small Rumin. Res. 28, 273-280. Watkins, P.J., Kearney, G., Rose, G., Allen, D., Ball, A.J., Pethick, D.W. and Warner, R.D. 2014. Effect of branched-chain fatty acids, 3-methylindole and 4-methylphenol on consumer sensory scores of grilled lamb meat. Meat Sci. 96, 1088-1094. Boutrolle, I., Arranz, D., Rogeaux, M. and Delarue, J. 2005. Comparing central location test and home use test results: Application of a new criterion. Food Qual. Prefer. 16, 704-713. Horcada, A., Ripoll, G., Alcalde, M.J., Sañudo, C., Teixeira, A. and Panea, B. 2012. Fatty acid profile of three adipose depots in seven Spanish breeds of suckling kids. Meat Sci. 92, 89-96. Colomer-Rocher, F., Delfa, R. and Sierra, I. 1988. Método normalizado para el estudio de los caracteres cuantitativos y cualitativos de las canales caprinas y ovinas producidas en el área Mediterránea, según los sistemas de producción. Cuadernos INIA 17, 19-41. Bunch, T.D., Evans, R.C., Wang, S., Brennand, C.P., Whittier, D.R. and Taylor, B.J. 2004. Feed efficiency, growth rates, carcass evaluation, cholesterol level and sensory evaluation of lambs of various hair and wool sheep and their crosses. Small Rumin. Res. 52, 239-345. Thompson, J.M., McIntyre, B.M., Tudor, G.D., Pethick, D.W., Polkinghorne, R. and Watson, R. 2008. Effects of hormonal growth promotants (HGP) on growth, carcass characteristics, the palatability of different muscles in beef carcass and their interaction with ageing. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 48, 1405-1414. De Graff, C., Cardello, A.V., Kramer, F.M., Lesher, L.L., Meiselman, H.L. and Schutz, H.G. 2005. A comparison between liking rating obtained under laboratory and field conditions: The role of choice. Appetite 44, 15-22. Haenlein, G.F.W. 2004. Goat milk in human nutrition. Small Rumin. Res. 51, 155-163. Resurrecion, A.V.A. 2003. Sensory aspect of consumer choices for meat and meat products. Meat Sci. 66, 11-20. Font-i-Furnols, M. 2012. Consumer studies on sensory acceptability of boar taint: A review. Meat Sci. 92, 319-329. ISO 8589. 1988. Sensory Analysis. General Guidance for the Design of Test Rooms, International Standards Organization publications, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. Martínez-Cerezo, S., Sañudo, C., Panea, B. and Olleta, J.L. 2005. Breed, slaughter weight and ageing time effects on consumer appraisal of the three muscles of lamb. Meat Sci. 69, 797-805. Sen, A.R., Santra, A. and Karim, S.A. 2004. Carcass yield, composition and meat quality attributes of sheep and goat under semiarid conditions. Meat Sci. 66, 757-763. Boutrolle, I., Delarue, J., Arranz, D., Rogeaux, M. and Köster, E.P. 2007. Central location test vs. home use test: Contrasting results depending on product type. Food Qual. Prefer. 18, 490-499. Madeira, M.S., Costa, P., Alfaia, C.M., Lopes, P.A., Bessa, R.J.B., Lemos, J.P.C. and Prates, J.A.M. 2013. The increased intramuscular fat promoted by dietary lysine restriction in lean but not in fatty pig genotypes improves pork sensory attributes. J. Anim. Sci. 91, 3177-3187. Smith, G.C., Pike, M.I. and Carpenter, Z.L. 1974. Comparison of the palatability of goat meat and meat from four other animal species. J. Food Sci. 39, 1145-1146. Park, B.Y., Hwang, I.H., Cho, S.H., Yoo, Y.M., Kim, J.H., Lee, J.M., Polkinghorne, R. and Thompson, J.M. 2008. Effect of carcass suspension and cooking method on the palatability of three beef muscles as assessed by Korean and Australian consumers. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 48, 1369-1404. Sañudo, C., Sánchez, A. and Alfonso, M. 1998. Small ruminant production systems and factors affecting lamb meat quality. Meat Sci. 49, S29-S64. Campo, M.M., Muela, E., Olleta, J.L., Santaliestra-Pasías, A.M., Mesana, M.I. and Sañudo, C. 2013. Influence of cooking method on the nutrient composition of Spanish light lamb. J. Food Compost. Anal. 31, 185-190. Dhanda, J.S., Taylor, D.G., McCosker, J.E. and Murray, P.J. 1999. The influence of goat genotype on the production of Capretto and Chevon carcasses. 1. Growth and carcass characteristics. Meat Sci. 52, 355-361. Shrestha, J.N.B. and Fahmy, M.H. 2005. Breeding goats for meat production: A review. Genetic resources, management and breed evaluation. Small Rumin. Res. 58, 93-106. 1998; 49 2007; 18 2004; 66 1989; 4 1998; 28 2013; 28 2006; 73 2012 2010; 19 2010; 123 1988; 17 2013; 91 2007; 75 2005; 44 2012; 10 2009; 115 2003; 76 2005; 69 1974; 39 2004; 52 2012; 92 2010; 21 1993; 34 2004; 51 2010; 25 2000; 15 2013; 12 2002; 62 2013; 31 1965 2008; 48 1994; 36 2008; 23 1999; 52 1998; 50 1981 2014; 96 2005; 16 2003; 65 2003; 66 1988 2005; 58 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 Sheridan R. (e_1_2_7_38_1) 2003; 76 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_40_1 Amerine M.A. (e_1_2_7_2_1) 1965 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_42_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_43_1 e_1_2_7_44_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_45_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_46_1 Naude R.T. (e_1_2_7_24_1) 1981 e_1_2_7_47_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 Ekiz B. (e_1_2_7_12_1) 2010; 19 Colomer‐Rocher F. (e_1_2_7_8_1) 1988; 17 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_34_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_35_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_37_1 ISO 8589 (e_1_2_7_17_1) 1988 e_1_2_7_39_1 |
| References_xml | – volume: 17 start-page: 19 year: 1988 end-page: 41 article-title: Método normalizado para el estudio de los caracteres cuantitativos y cualitativos de las canales caprinas y ovinas producidas en el área Mediterránea, según los sistemas de producción publication-title: Cuadernos INIA – start-page: 285 year: 1981 end-page: 307 – volume: 66 start-page: 11 year: 2003 end-page: 20 article-title: Sensory aspect of consumer choices for meat and meat products publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 58 start-page: 93 year: 2005 end-page: 106 article-title: Breeding goats for meat production: A review. Genetic resources, management and breed evaluation publication-title: Small Rumin. Res. – volume: 18 start-page: 490 year: 2007 end-page: 499 article-title: Central location test vs. home use test: Contrasting results depending on product type publication-title: Food Qual. Prefer. – volume: 48 start-page: 1405 year: 2008 end-page: 1414 article-title: Effects of hormonal growth promotants (HGP) on growth, carcass characteristics, the palatability of different muscles in beef carcass and their interaction with ageing publication-title: Aust. J. Exp. Agric. – volume: 10 start-page: 1025 year: 2012 end-page: 1036 article-title: Influence of breed, milk diet and slaughter weight on carcass traits of suckling kids from seven Spanish breeds publication-title: Span. J. Agric. Res. – volume: 92 start-page: 89 year: 2012 end-page: 96 article-title: Fatty acid profile of three adipose depots in seven Spanish breeds of suckling kids publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 75 start-page: 610 year: 2007 end-page: 621 article-title: Regional variation in the hedonic evaluation of lamb meat from diverse production systems by consumers in six European countries publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 23 start-page: 707 year: 2008 end-page: 719 article-title: Location and scale influence on sensory acceptability measurements among low‐income consumers publication-title: J. Sensory Studies – volume: 66 start-page: 757 year: 2004 end-page: 763 article-title: Carcass yield, composition and meat quality attributes of sheep and goat under semiarid conditions publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 52 start-page: 239 year: 2004 end-page: 345 article-title: Feed efficiency, growth rates, carcass evaluation, cholesterol level and sensory evaluation of lambs of various hair and wool sheep and their crosses publication-title: Small Rumin. Res. – volume: 48 start-page: 1369 year: 2008 end-page: 1404 article-title: Effect of carcass suspension and cooking method on the palatability of three beef muscles as assessed by Korean and Australian consumers publication-title: Aust. J. Exp. Agric. – volume: 44 start-page: 15 year: 2005 end-page: 22 article-title: A comparison between liking rating obtained under laboratory and field conditions: The role of choice publication-title: Appetite – volume: 21 start-page: 794 year: 2010 end-page: 804 article-title: Effect of sensory education on food preferences in children publication-title: Food Qual. Prefer. – volume: 91 start-page: 3177 year: 2013 end-page: 3187 article-title: The increased intramuscular fat promoted by dietary lysine restriction in lean but not in fatty pig genotypes improves pork sensory attributes publication-title: J. Anim. Sci. – volume: 16 start-page: 704 year: 2005 end-page: 713 article-title: Comparing central location test and home use test results: Application of a new criterion publication-title: Food Qual. Prefer. – volume: 28 start-page: 76 year: 2013 end-page: 89 article-title: Perfume odor categorization: To what extent trained assessors and consumers agree? publication-title: J. Sensory Studies – volume: 34 start-page: 363 year: 1993 end-page: 379 article-title: Flavor and tenderness related quality characteristics of goat and sheep meat publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 10 start-page: 690 year: 2012 end-page: 700 article-title: Carcass characteristics and instrumental meat quality of suckling kids and lambs publication-title: Span. J. Agric. Res. – volume: 51 start-page: 155 year: 2004 end-page: 163 article-title: Goat milk in human nutrition publication-title: Small Rumin. Res. – volume: 50 start-page: 131 year: 1998 end-page: 136 article-title: Sensory evaluation of young goat meat publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 92 start-page: 319 year: 2012 end-page: 329 article-title: Consumer studies on sensory acceptability of boar taint: A review publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 65 start-page: 785 year: 2003 end-page: 789 article-title: Consumer sensory evaluation of plain and seasoned goat meat and beef products publication-title: Meat Sci. – year: 2012 – volume: 115 start-page: 1081 year: 2009 end-page: 1087 article-title: Volatile flavor profile of goat meat extracted by three widely used techniques publication-title: Food Chem. – volume: 25 start-page: 280 year: 2010 end-page: 293 article-title: Evaluation on farmed cod products by a trained sensory panel and consumers in different test setting publication-title: J. Sensory Studies – volume: 36 start-page: 67 year: 1994 end-page: 77 article-title: Sensory properties and preferences publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 15 start-page: 421 year: 2000 end-page: 436 article-title: Home placement testing of lamb conducted in six countries publication-title: J. Sensory Studies – volume: 12 start-page: 1919 year: 2013 end-page: 1930 article-title: Key factors involved in lamb quality from farm to fork in Europe publication-title: J. Integr. Agric. – volume: 49 start-page: S29 year: 1998 end-page: S64 article-title: Small ruminant production systems and factors affecting lamb meat quality publication-title: Meat Sci. – year: 1965 – volume: 31 start-page: 185 year: 2013 end-page: 190 article-title: Influence of cooking method on the nutrient composition of Spanish light lamb publication-title: J. Food Compost. Anal. – volume: 69 start-page: 797 year: 2005 end-page: 805 article-title: Breed, slaughter weight and ageing time effects on consumer appraisal of the three muscles of lamb publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 92 start-page: 62 year: 2012 end-page: 70 article-title: Effect of slaughter weight and breed on instrumental and sensory meat quality of suckling kids publication-title: Meat Sci. – year: 1988 – volume: 123 start-page: 513 year: 2010 end-page: 520 article-title: Determination of some water‐soluble aroma precursors in goat meat and their enrolment on flavour profile of goat meat publication-title: Food Chem. – volume: 52 start-page: 355 year: 1999 end-page: 361 article-title: The influence of goat genotype on the production of Capretto and Chevon carcasses. 1. Growth and carcass characteristics publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 4 start-page: 129 year: 1989 end-page: 148 article-title: Designs to balance the effect of order presentation and first‐order and carry over effects in hall test publication-title: J. Sensory Studies – volume: 62 start-page: 295 year: 2002 end-page: 308 article-title: Managing meat tenderness publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 19 start-page: 368 year: 2010 end-page: 378 article-title: Carcass quality characteristics of hair goat and Saanen x hair goat crossbred kids from intensive production systems publication-title: J. Anim. Feed Sci. – volume: 73 start-page: 82 year: 2006 end-page: 89 article-title: Carcass characteristics of suckling lambs protected by the PGI “Lechazo de Castilla y León” European quality label: Effect of breed, sex and carcass weight publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 76 start-page: 73 year: 2003 end-page: 79 article-title: Meat quality of Boer goat kids and Mutton Merino lambs 2. Sensory meat evaluation publication-title: Anim. Sci. – volume: 39 start-page: 1145 year: 1974 end-page: 1146 article-title: Comparison of the palatability of goat meat and meat from four other animal species publication-title: J. Food Sci. – volume: 96 start-page: 1088 year: 2014 end-page: 1094 article-title: Effect of branched‐chain fatty acids, 3‐methylindole and 4‐methylphenol on consumer sensory scores of grilled lamb meat publication-title: Meat Sci. – volume: 28 start-page: 273 year: 1998 end-page: 280 article-title: Some physical, chemical and sensory properties of chevron products from three New Zealand goat breeds publication-title: Small Rumin. Res. – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.07.001 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5424 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1989.tb00463.x – ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 doi: 10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00183-4 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.018 – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(94)90034-5 – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2008.00181.x – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00023-0 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00283-8 – volume-title: Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food year: 1965 ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 contributor: fullname: Amerine M.A. – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.05.009 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.09.009 – ident: e_1_2_7_45_1 doi: 10.1071/EA07131 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.11.002 – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.011 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2013.05.010 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.04.004 – ident: e_1_2_7_46_1 doi: 10.1111/joss.12025 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.11.013 – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00035-4 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.5424/sjar/2012104-2659 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.06.003 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00021-4 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00073-4 – volume: 17 start-page: 19 year: 1988 ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 article-title: Método normalizado para el estudio de los caracteres cuantitativos y cualitativos de las canales caprinas y ovinas producidas en el área Mediterránea, según los sistemas de producción publication-title: Cuadernos INIA contributor: fullname: Colomer‐Rocher F. – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00016-9 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.08.010 – ident: e_1_2_7_44_1 doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00126-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.03.008 – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(93)90084-U – volume: 19 start-page: 368 year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 article-title: Carcass quality characteristics of hair goat and Saanen x hair goat crossbred kids from intensive production systems publication-title: J. Anim. Feed Sci. doi: 10.22358/jafs/66300/2010 contributor: fullname: Ekiz B. – volume: 76 start-page: 73 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 article-title: Meat quality of Boer goat kids and Mutton Merino lambs 2. Sensory meat evaluation publication-title: Anim. Sci. doi: 10.1017/S1357729800053339 contributor: fullname: Sheridan R. – ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2009.00257.x – ident: e_1_2_7_47_1 doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.08.011 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1071/EA07189 – ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60629-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.12.065 – start-page: 285 volume-title: Goat Production year: 1981 ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 contributor: fullname: Naude R.T. – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2003.06.002 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2000.tb00280.x – ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 doi: 10.5424/sjar/2012103-670-11 – ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 doi: 10.1016/S0921-4488(97)00087-4 – volume-title: Sensory Analysis. General Guidance for the Design of Test Rooms year: 1988 ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 contributor: fullname: ISO 8589 – ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1974.tb07338.x – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.015 |
| SSID | ssj0008974 |
| Score | 2.1495032 |
| Snippet | The meat from 60 commercial suckling males of five Spanish goat breeds (n = 10 each) (Moncaína [MO], Pirenaica [PI], Negra Serrana [NS], Blanca Celtibérica... Abstract The meat from 60 commercial suckling males of five S panish goat breeds ( n = 10 each) ( M oncaína [ MO ], P irenaica [ PI ], N egra S errana [ NS ],... The meat from 60 commercial suckling males of five Spanish goat breeds (n=10 each) (Moncaína [MO], Pirenaica [PI], Negra Serrana [NS], Blanca Celtibérica [BC]... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref wiley istex fao |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 201 |
| SubjectTerms | condiments consumer acceptance consumer preferences cooking dairy sheep flavor food industry goat breeds Goats laboratory techniques lamb meat males small ruminants temperature |
| Title | Comparison of Laboratory‐Based and Home‐Based Tests of Consumer Preferences Using Kid and Lamb Meat |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-G3162JDF-R/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjoss.12095 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1531925510/abstract/ |
| Volume | 29 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LTxRBEK4gF72IoIZRJJ1oOJgMmUfPTE_CBRcWsuJqWDZyMZ1-rdmAu2R3SYSTP8HfyC-hqucBeDDR26QzPenuqur6alL1FcC7rCh1ho4gNIXmIXelCoUuTWhQvYTIIl1qnyDbzw-HvHeanS7BTlMLU_FDtD_cyDL8fU0GrvT8vpFTER5VflKFOTHpESI6vuOOEmVFwUxWhGFQVHOT-jSeduoDb_RopKaIUel4fz4AnPdhq_c73RX41qy4Sjc5275c6G1z_QeZ4_9u6Rk8rQEp2600aBWW3GQNgr2xW7AtVrOGnrN-Q9q_Bo-bWub5cxjvsk7byJBNR-yo0qnp7Orm1-8P6CEtUxPLqBl7O3CCu53Ty526_JN9aZudzJnPYWAfx9XEI_VDs0_oL17AsLt_0jkM6-YNoUkRxISJs8Ja4UYYkuWKo0pozrVSRczjZKQQeGrDBTW653lqM2dsrBDdRNomGDYjkngJy5PpxK0DE4XLlbOmyMuMc5vqTJWFU0LHJqVedAG8bYQoLyqODtnGNjgu_ZEGsI7yleo7HokcDhIKLSNKRy2LALa80NvZanZGCW9FJr_2D-RBGudJb68rjwPYaLRC1raOX6drDCOzOArgvRfvX1Yhe58HA__06l9efg1PaMFVjtoGLC9ml-4NoqGF3vRafwsZJQNC |
| link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,1382,27957,27958,46329,46753 |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxEB7RcigXHgXULQUsgXpA2mof9j6ObUoa0jSgJhG9WX4FRW2TKkkl4MRP6G_klzDj3SwtByS4rSx75ceM5xtr5huAtyIvtUBDEJpc85C7UoWFLk1oULyKQkS61D5Atp91Rrx7Js7q2BzKhan4IZoHN9IMf1-TgtOD9G0tpyw8Sv0Ua3Af9V14j-r0N3tUUVYkzKRH6AhFNTupD-Rpxt6xR2tjNUOUShv89Q7kvA1cveVpP6rKqy48YSEFnJzvXS_1nvn-B53jfy_qMTysMSnbr4ToCdxz000IDiduyXZZTRx6wfor3v5N2FilMy-ewmSftZpahmw2Zr1KrGbzbz9_3BygkbRMTS2jeuxNwxCXu6DOrToDlH1q6p0smA9jYMeTamBPXWp2gibjGYza74etTljXbwhNijgmTJwtrC3cGL2yTHGUCs25ViqPeZyMFWJPbXhBte55llrhjI0VApxI2wQ9ZwQTz2F9Opu6LWBF7jLlrMmzUnBuUy1UmTtV6NikVI4ugDerU5RXFU2HbNwbbJd-SwPYwgOW6gtuiRwNEvIuI4pILfMAdv2pN6PV_Jxi3nIhP_eP5FEaZ0n3sC1PA9hZiYWs1R3_TjcZOmdxFMA7f75_mYXsfhwM_Nf2v3R-DRud4UlP9j70j1_AA5p8FbK2A-vL-bV7ieBoqV95FfgFW-kHZA |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxEB61RQIuFAqoCwUsgXpA2mof9q5X4lIS0pKGUDWN6AVZfi2KCkmVpBL01J_Q38gvYex90HJAgtvKWq9sz4znm9XMNwCvWF4oho4g1LmiIbWFDLkqdKhRvThnkSqUT5AdZvtj2j9hJyvwpqmFqfgh2h9uzjL8fe0M_MyU143cFeG5yk-2CrdoliZOp7tHv8mjeFFxMDszwjgoqslJfR5PO_eGO1ot5QxBqjvf7zcQ53Xc6h1Pbx0-N0uu8k1Od86Xakdf_MHm-L97ug_3akRKdisVegArdroBQXdil2Sb1LShX8mwYe3fgDtNMfPiIUx2SaftZEhmJRlUSjWb__h5efUWXaQhcmqI68beDhzjbhfu5U5d_0kO224nC-KTGMjBpJo4kN8U-YAO4xGMe--OO_th3b0h1CmimDCxhhvDbYkxWSYp6oSiVEmZxzROSonIU2nKXad7FJ5hVptYIryJlEkwbkYo8RjWprOp3QTCc5tJa3SeFYxSkyomi9xKrmKdumZ0AbxshCjOKpIO0QY3OC78kQawifIV8gseiRiPEhdbRi4ftcgD2PZCb2fL-anLeMuZ-DTcE3tpnCX9bk8cBbDVaIWojR2_7u4xDM3iKIDXXrx_WYXofxyN_NOTf3n5Bdw-xAUM3g8PnsJdt_YqX20L1pbzc_sMkdFSPfcG8AtAkwYT |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Comparison+of+Laboratory%E2%80%90Based+and+Home%E2%80%90Based+Tests+of+Consumer+Preferences+Using+Kid+and+Lamb+Meat&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+sensory+studies&rft.au=Guerrero%2C+A.&rft.au=Campo%2C+M.M.&rft.au=Cilla%2C+I.&rft.au=Olleta%2C+J.L.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.issn=0887-8250&rft.eissn=1745-459X&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjoss.12095&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_joss_12095 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0887-8250&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0887-8250&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0887-8250&client=summon |