Signaling the unconditioned stimulus during the preexposure phase does not attenuate the unconditioned stimulus preexposure effect in preweanling rats

The unconditioned stimulus preexposure effect (US‐PE) is defined as an attenuation of the conditioned response after preexposure to the US prior to conditioning. Evidence exists that this effect can be weakened or eliminated by the presence of a signal predicting the US during the preexposure phase....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDevelopmental psychobiology Vol. 54; no. 8; pp. 808 - 817
Main Authors Castello, Stefania, Bobbio, Antonella, Orellana, Estefania, Arias, Carlos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.12.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0012-1630
1098-2302
1098-2302
DOI10.1002/dev.21001

Cover

Abstract The unconditioned stimulus preexposure effect (US‐PE) is defined as an attenuation of the conditioned response after preexposure to the US prior to conditioning. Evidence exists that this effect can be weakened or eliminated by the presence of a signal predicting the US during the preexposure phase. This evidence has been found consistently across a variety of procedures in adult rats. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether, in infant rats, signaling the US (LiCl) during preexposure with a salient cue (almond odor) attenuates the US‐PE. During the preexposure phase, preweanling rats received three (Experiment 1) or one (Experiment 2) preexposures to LiCl, preceded by exposure to almond odor. Appropriate control groups were also included in these experiments. After preexposure, two conditioning trials were carried out in which subjects were given LiCl after saccharin consumption. During preexposure, three (Experiment 1a), although not one (Experiment 2a), contingent exposures to almond odor and LiCl resulted in a strong odor aversion. Extinction of the learned taste aversion was facilitated by prior experience with LiCl (Experiments 1b and 2b). This effect was observed regardless of whether or not LiCl was signaled by the almond odor. These results do not coincide with the associative hypotheses proposed to explain the US‐PE, nor are they concurrent with alternative explanations based on the learned helplessness phenomenon. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals,Inc. Dev Psychobiol 54: 808–817, 2012
AbstractList The unconditioned stimulus preexposure effect (US‐PE) is defined as an attenuation of the conditioned response after preexposure to the US prior to conditioning. Evidence exists that this effect can be weakened or eliminated by the presence of a signal predicting the US during the preexposure phase. This evidence has been found consistently across a variety of procedures in adult rats. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether, in infant rats, signaling the US (LiCl) during preexposure with a salient cue (almond odor) attenuates the US‐PE. During the preexposure phase, preweanling rats received three (Experiment 1) or one (Experiment 2) preexposures to LiCl, preceded by exposure to almond odor. Appropriate control groups were also included in these experiments. After preexposure, two conditioning trials were carried out in which subjects were given LiCl after saccharin consumption. During preexposure, three (Experiment 1a), although not one (Experiment 2a), contingent exposures to almond odor and LiCl resulted in a strong odor aversion. Extinction of the learned taste aversion was facilitated by prior experience with LiCl (Experiments 1b and 2b). This effect was observed regardless of whether or not LiCl was signaled by the almond odor. These results do not coincide with the associative hypotheses proposed to explain the US‐PE, nor are they concurrent with alternative explanations based on the learned helplessness phenomenon. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals,Inc. Dev Psychobiol 54: 808–817, 2012
The unconditioned stimulus preexposure effect (US-PE) is defined as an attenuation of the conditioned response after preexposure to the US prior to conditioning. Evidence exists that this effect can be weakened or eliminated by the presence of a signal predicting the US during the preexposure phase. This evidence has been found consistently across a variety of procedures in adult rats. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether, in infant rats, signaling the US (LiCl) during preexposure with a salient cue (almond odor) attenuates the US-PE. During the preexposure phase, preweanling rats received three (Experiment 1) or one (Experiment 2) preexposures to LiCl, preceded by exposure to almond odor. Appropriate control groups were also included in these experiments. After preexposure, two conditioning trials were carried out in which subjects were given LiCl after saccharin consumption. During preexposure, three (Experiment 1a), although not one (Experiment 2a), contingent exposures to almond odor and LiCl resulted in a strong odor aversion. Extinction of the learned taste aversion was facilitated by prior experience with LiCl (Experiments 1b and 2b). This effect was observed regardless of whether or not LiCl was signaled by the almond odor. These results do not coincide with the associative hypotheses proposed to explain the US-PE, nor are they concurrent with alternative explanations based on the learned helplessness phenomenon.
The unconditioned stimulus preexposure effect (US-PE) is defined as an attenuation of the conditioned response after preexposure to the US prior to conditioning. Evidence exists that this effect can be weakened or eliminated by the presence of a signal predicting the US during the preexposure phase. This evidence has been found consistently across a variety of procedures in adult rats. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether, in infant rats, signaling the US (LiCl) during preexposure with a salient cue (almond odor) attenuates the US-PE. During the preexposure phase, preweanling rats received three (Experiment 1) or one (Experiment 2) preexposures to LiCl, preceded by exposure to almond odor. Appropriate control groups were also included in these experiments. After preexposure, two conditioning trials were carried out in which subjects were given LiCl after saccharin consumption. During preexposure, three (Experiment 1a), although not one (Experiment 2a), contingent exposures to almond odor and LiCl resulted in a strong odor aversion. Extinction of the learned taste aversion was facilitated by prior experience with LiCl (Experiments 1b and 2b). This effect was observed regardless of whether or not LiCl was signaled by the almond odor. These results do not coincide with the associative hypotheses proposed to explain the US-PE, nor are they concurrent with alternative explanations based on the learned helplessness phenomenon.The unconditioned stimulus preexposure effect (US-PE) is defined as an attenuation of the conditioned response after preexposure to the US prior to conditioning. Evidence exists that this effect can be weakened or eliminated by the presence of a signal predicting the US during the preexposure phase. This evidence has been found consistently across a variety of procedures in adult rats. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether, in infant rats, signaling the US (LiCl) during preexposure with a salient cue (almond odor) attenuates the US-PE. During the preexposure phase, preweanling rats received three (Experiment 1) or one (Experiment 2) preexposures to LiCl, preceded by exposure to almond odor. Appropriate control groups were also included in these experiments. After preexposure, two conditioning trials were carried out in which subjects were given LiCl after saccharin consumption. During preexposure, three (Experiment 1a), although not one (Experiment 2a), contingent exposures to almond odor and LiCl resulted in a strong odor aversion. Extinction of the learned taste aversion was facilitated by prior experience with LiCl (Experiments 1b and 2b). This effect was observed regardless of whether or not LiCl was signaled by the almond odor. These results do not coincide with the associative hypotheses proposed to explain the US-PE, nor are they concurrent with alternative explanations based on the learned helplessness phenomenon.
Author Arias, Carlos
Castello, Stefania
Orellana, Estefania
Bobbio, Antonella
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Stefania
  surname: Castello
  fullname: Castello, Stefania
  organization: Psychology Department, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, CP 5000, Argentina
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Antonella
  surname: Bobbio
  fullname: Bobbio, Antonella
  organization: Psychology Department, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, CP 5000, Argentina
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Estefania
  surname: Orellana
  fullname: Orellana, Estefania
  organization: Psychology Department, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, CP 5000, Argentina
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Carlos
  surname: Arias
  fullname: Arias, Carlos
  email: afelicidade@yahoo.es
  organization: Psychology Department, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, CP 5000, Argentina
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22213476$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kclOHDEQhi1EBAPhkBeI-pgcGrzM9HJEhCUCESkkgZtVbZfBocc98RLgRfK8eJiZCEUQqSSXS9__l121Rdbd4JCQd4zuMkr5nsbfuzxnbI2MGG2bkgvK18koV3jJKkE3yVYIP_OVjZt6g2xyzpkY19WI_Lmw1w56666LeINFcmpw2kabG-giRDtNfQqFTn5FzDzi_WwIyef8BgIWesBQuCEWECO6BBH_Z_Vcj8agioV18-odgnt6h4cY3pI3BvqAO8tzm3w_Ovx2cFKefTn-fLB_VipRCVZ2XFf1pBHYtLzLQY0CRVtDWzDQwVhU1AhtJgBKszFTjZiIlvNWsbpuOk7FNvmw8J354VfCEOXUBoV9Dw6HFGQemGjqHFVG3y_R1E1Ry5m3U_APcjXLDOwtAOWHEDwaqWyE-f-jB9tLRuV8WzJvSz5tKys-_qNYmb7ELt3vbI8Pr4Py0-GPlaJcKGyIeP9XAf5WVrWoJ_Ly_Fh-PT0_urqomDwRj2VZtv4
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_dev_21140
Cites_doi 10.1006/lmot.1996.0021
10.1002/dev.420220407
10.1016/j.alcohol.2006.10.002
10.1037/0097-7403.30.1.58
10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.523
10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.573
10.1002/dev.20460
10.1101/lm.1755810
10.1002/dev.20418
10.1093/chemse/bjq075
10.3758/BF03337815
10.1037/0735-7044.112.1.126
10.1037/0735-7044.117.1.113
10.1037/0735-7044.112.5.1142
10.1037/0735-7044.120.3.710
10.1037/0735-7044.108.2.227
10.3758/BF03192864
10.1037/0097-7403.3.2.189
10.1002/dev.20074
10.1016/0023-9690(81)90012-6
10.1002/dev.20244
10.1002/dev.420170407
10.1037/0097-7403.1.3.270
10.1093/chemse/bjr026
10.1002/dev.420160103
10.1016/0892-0362(92)90020-B
10.3758/BF03199972
10.3758/BF03209785
10.1080/02724990244000115
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1002/dev.21001
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Biology
Zoology
Psychology
EISSN 1098-2302
EndPage 817
ExternalDocumentID 22213476
10_1002_dev_21001
DEV21001
ark_67375_WNG_RKNFXS61_H
Genre article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--Z
-ET
-~X
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
31~
33P
36B
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABTAH
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACKIV
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADRHT
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
B-7
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CS3
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR1
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
G-S
G.N
GAKWD
GNP
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HBH
HF~
HGLYW
HHY
HVGLF
HZ~
H~9
IX1
J0M
JPC
KQQ
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M6M
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MVM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OHT
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RWD
RWI
RX1
RYL
S10
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TN5
TWZ
UB1
UPT
V2E
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WGLLI
WH7
WHG
WIB
WIH
WIK
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WSUWO
WUP
WXSBR
XG1
XJT
XOL
XPP
XSW
XV2
YCJ
YQI
YQJ
ZGI
ZXP
ZY4
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAHQN
AAMNL
AANHP
AAYCA
ACRPL
ACYXJ
ADNMO
AFWVQ
ALVPJ
AAYXX
ADXHL
AETEA
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3631-b2d67583e892b92b0fcac09f09afaba4360f3df5aacd141c83539229c1778b203
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0012-1630
1098-2302
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 12:34:48 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:01:49 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:50 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:42:23 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:48:44 EST 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:53:25 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3631-b2d67583e892b92b0fcac09f09afaba4360f3df5aacd141c83539229c1778b203
Notes ark:/67375/WNG-RKNFXS61-H
Stefania Castello and Antonella Bobbio contributed equally to the study.
ArticleID:DEV21001
istex:402D60BB7B51B0829B0F497FA00957692BB2901D
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 22213476
PQID 1143873876
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1143873876
pubmed_primary_22213476
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_dev_21001
crossref_primary_10_1002_dev_21001
wiley_primary_10_1002_dev_21001_DEV21001
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_RKNFXS61_H
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-12
December 2012
2012-12-00
2012-Dec
20121201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-12
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Hoboken
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Hoboken
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Developmental psychobiology
PublicationTitleAlternate Dev. Psychobiol
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
References Aguado, L., Hall, G., Harrington, N., & Symonds, M. (1998). Illness-induced context aversion learning in rats with lesions of the dorsal hippocampus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 1142-1151.
Arias, C., Pautassi, R. M., Molina, J. C., & Spear, N. E. (2010). A comparison between taste avoidance and conditioned disgust reactions induced by ethanol and lithium chloride in preweanling rats. Developmental Psychobiology, 52, 545-557.
Mikulka, P. J., Leard, B., & Klein, S. B. (1977). Illness-alone exposure as a source of interference with the acquisition and retention of a taste aversion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 189-201.
Kraemer, P. J., Kraemer, E. L., Smoller, D. E., & Spear, N. E. (1989). Enhancement of flavor aversion conditioning in weanling but not adult rats by prior conditioning to an odor. Psychobiology, 17, 34-42.
Baker, A. G., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1979). Pre-exposure to the Cs alone, Us alone, or Cs and Us uncorrelated: Latent inhibition, blocking by context, or learned irrelevance? Learning and Motivation, 15, 709-720.
Chotro, M. G., & Alonso, G. (2003). Stimulus preexposure reduces generalization of conditioned taste aversions between alcohol and non-alcohol flavors in infant rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117, 113-122.
Revillo, D. A., Spear, N. E., & Arias, C. (2011). Ontogenetic differences in sensitivity to LiCl- and amphetamine-induced taste avoidance in preweanling rats. Chemical Senses, 36, 565-577.
de Brugada, I., Hall, G., & Symonds, M. (2004). The US-preexposure effect in lithium-induced flavor-aversion conditioning is a consequence of blocking by injection cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30, 58-66.
Parker, L. A., Hills, K., & Jensen, K. (1984). Behavioral CRs elicited by a lithium or an amphetamine-paired contextual test chamber. Animal Learning and Behavior, 12, 307-315.
Foster, J. A., & Burman, M. A. (2010). Evidence for hippocampus-dependent contextual learning at postnatal day 17 in the rat. Learning & Memory, 17, 259-266.
Rudy, J. W., & Morledge, P. (1994). Ontogeny of contextual fear conditioning in rats: Implications for consolidation, infantile amnesia, and hippocampal system function. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 227-234.
Holson, R. R., & Pearce, B. (1992). Principles and pitfalls in the analysis of prenatal treatment effects in multiparous species. Neurotoxicology & Teratology, 14, 221-228.
Spear, L. P., Specht, S. M., Kirstein, C. L., & Kuhn, C. M. (1989). Anterior and posterior, but not cheek, intraoral cannulation procedures elevate serum corticosterone levels in neonatal rat pups. Developmental Psychobiology, 22, 401-411.
Caspy, T., & Lubow, R. E. (1981). Generality of US preexposure effects: Transfer from food to shock or shock to food with and without the same response requirements. Animal Learning & Behavior, 9, 524-532.
Brasser, S. M., & Spear, N. E. (1998). A sensory-enhanced context facilitates learning and multiple measures of unconditioned stimulus processing in the preweanling rat. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 126-140.
de Brugada, I., Gonzalez, F., & Candido, A. (2003). The role of injection cues in the associative control of the US pre-exposure effect in flavour aversion learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 241-252.
Arias, C., & Gabriela Chotro, M. (2006). Interactions between prenatal ethanol exposure and postnatal learning about ethanol in rat pups. Alcohol, 40, 51-59.
Gautam, S. H., & Verhagen, J. V. (2010). Evidence that the sweetness of odors depends on experience in rats. Chemical Senses, 35, 767-776.
Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. (1996). National Research Council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
Yap, C. S., & Richardson, R. (2007). Extinction in the developing rat: An examination of renewal effects. Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 565-575.
Yap, C. S., & Richardson, R. (2005). Latent inhibition in the developing rat: An examination of context-specific effects. Developmental Psychobiology, 47, 55-65.
Cannon, D. S., Berman, R. F., Baker, T. B., & Atkins, C. A. (1975). Effect of preconditioning unconditioned stimulus experience on learned taste aversions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 270-284.
de Brugada, I., Gonzalez, F., Gil, M., & Hall, G. (2005). The role of habituation of the response to LiCl in the US-preexposure effect. Learning & Behavior, 33, 363-370.
Wasserman, E. A., & Miller, R. R. (1997). What's elementary about associative learning? Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 573-607.
Cole, K. C., VanTilburg, D., Burch-Vernon, A., & Riccio, D. C. (1996). The importance of context in the US preexposure effect in CTA: Novel versus latently inhibited contextual stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 27, 362-374.
Randich, A., & LoLordo, V. M. (1979). Associative and nonassociative theories of the UCS preexposure phenomenon: Implications for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 523-548.
Rudy, J. W., & Cheatle, M. D. (1983). Odor-aversion learning by rats following LiCl exposure: Ontogenetic influences. Developmental Psychobiology, 16, 13-22.
Randich, A. (1981). The US preexposure phenomenon in the conditioned suppression paradigm: A role for conditioned situational stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 12, 321-341.
Diaz-Cenzano, E., & Chotro, M. G. (2010). The effect of taste familiarity on intake and taste reactivity in infant rats. Developmental Psychobiology, 52, 109-120.
Arias, C., & Chotro, M. G. (2006). Ethanol-induced preferences or aversions as a function of age in preweanling rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 120, 710-718.
Caza, P. A., & Spear, N. E. (1984). Short-term exposure to an odor increases its subsequent preference in preweanling rats: A descriptive profile of the phenomenon. Developmental Psychobiology, 17, 407-422.
1989; 22
1979; 15
2003; 117
2010; 35
2010; 17
1997; 48
2009
1981; 9
1996
1972
1992; 14
2011; 36
1998; 112
1983; 16
2003; 56
2005; 47
2004; 30
2006; 40
2001
1984; 17
1984; 12
1977; 3
2006; 120
1975; 1
1979; 86
1996; 27
1994; 108
2010; 52
2005; 33
1969
1989; 17
1981; 12
2007; 49
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
Rescorla R. A. (e_1_2_7_29_1) 1972
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
Riley A. L. (e_1_2_7_30_1) 2001
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
Kraemer P. J. (e_1_2_7_23_1) 1989; 17
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_26_1
e_1_2_7_27_1
e_1_2_7_28_1
Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources (e_1_2_7_21_1) 1996
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_31_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
Rudy J. W. (e_1_2_7_32_1) 1994; 108
e_1_2_7_33_1
e_1_2_7_34_1
e_1_2_7_35_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
e_1_2_7_36_1
Baker A. G. (e_1_2_7_6_1) 1979; 15
Kamin L. J. (e_1_2_7_22_1) 1969
Hall G. (e_1_2_7_19_1) 2009
References_xml – reference: Parker, L. A., Hills, K., & Jensen, K. (1984). Behavioral CRs elicited by a lithium or an amphetamine-paired contextual test chamber. Animal Learning and Behavior, 12, 307-315.
– reference: Foster, J. A., & Burman, M. A. (2010). Evidence for hippocampus-dependent contextual learning at postnatal day 17 in the rat. Learning & Memory, 17, 259-266.
– reference: de Brugada, I., Gonzalez, F., Gil, M., & Hall, G. (2005). The role of habituation of the response to LiCl in the US-preexposure effect. Learning & Behavior, 33, 363-370.
– reference: Caza, P. A., & Spear, N. E. (1984). Short-term exposure to an odor increases its subsequent preference in preweanling rats: A descriptive profile of the phenomenon. Developmental Psychobiology, 17, 407-422.
– reference: Rudy, J. W., & Cheatle, M. D. (1983). Odor-aversion learning by rats following LiCl exposure: Ontogenetic influences. Developmental Psychobiology, 16, 13-22.
– reference: Yap, C. S., & Richardson, R. (2007). Extinction in the developing rat: An examination of renewal effects. Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 565-575.
– reference: Kraemer, P. J., Kraemer, E. L., Smoller, D. E., & Spear, N. E. (1989). Enhancement of flavor aversion conditioning in weanling but not adult rats by prior conditioning to an odor. Psychobiology, 17, 34-42.
– reference: Randich, A. (1981). The US preexposure phenomenon in the conditioned suppression paradigm: A role for conditioned situational stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 12, 321-341.
– reference: Caspy, T., & Lubow, R. E. (1981). Generality of US preexposure effects: Transfer from food to shock or shock to food with and without the same response requirements. Animal Learning & Behavior, 9, 524-532.
– reference: de Brugada, I., Hall, G., & Symonds, M. (2004). The US-preexposure effect in lithium-induced flavor-aversion conditioning is a consequence of blocking by injection cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30, 58-66.
– reference: Spear, L. P., Specht, S. M., Kirstein, C. L., & Kuhn, C. M. (1989). Anterior and posterior, but not cheek, intraoral cannulation procedures elevate serum corticosterone levels in neonatal rat pups. Developmental Psychobiology, 22, 401-411.
– reference: Holson, R. R., & Pearce, B. (1992). Principles and pitfalls in the analysis of prenatal treatment effects in multiparous species. Neurotoxicology & Teratology, 14, 221-228.
– reference: Aguado, L., Hall, G., Harrington, N., & Symonds, M. (1998). Illness-induced context aversion learning in rats with lesions of the dorsal hippocampus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 1142-1151.
– reference: Rudy, J. W., & Morledge, P. (1994). Ontogeny of contextual fear conditioning in rats: Implications for consolidation, infantile amnesia, and hippocampal system function. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 227-234.
– reference: Diaz-Cenzano, E., & Chotro, M. G. (2010). The effect of taste familiarity on intake and taste reactivity in infant rats. Developmental Psychobiology, 52, 109-120.
– reference: Yap, C. S., & Richardson, R. (2005). Latent inhibition in the developing rat: An examination of context-specific effects. Developmental Psychobiology, 47, 55-65.
– reference: Randich, A., & LoLordo, V. M. (1979). Associative and nonassociative theories of the UCS preexposure phenomenon: Implications for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 523-548.
– reference: Mikulka, P. J., Leard, B., & Klein, S. B. (1977). Illness-alone exposure as a source of interference with the acquisition and retention of a taste aversion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 189-201.
– reference: Baker, A. G., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1979). Pre-exposure to the Cs alone, Us alone, or Cs and Us uncorrelated: Latent inhibition, blocking by context, or learned irrelevance? Learning and Motivation, 15, 709-720.
– reference: Brasser, S. M., & Spear, N. E. (1998). A sensory-enhanced context facilitates learning and multiple measures of unconditioned stimulus processing in the preweanling rat. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 126-140.
– reference: Revillo, D. A., Spear, N. E., & Arias, C. (2011). Ontogenetic differences in sensitivity to LiCl- and amphetamine-induced taste avoidance in preweanling rats. Chemical Senses, 36, 565-577.
– reference: Arias, C., & Gabriela Chotro, M. (2006). Interactions between prenatal ethanol exposure and postnatal learning about ethanol in rat pups. Alcohol, 40, 51-59.
– reference: Cannon, D. S., Berman, R. F., Baker, T. B., & Atkins, C. A. (1975). Effect of preconditioning unconditioned stimulus experience on learned taste aversions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 270-284.
– reference: de Brugada, I., Gonzalez, F., & Candido, A. (2003). The role of injection cues in the associative control of the US pre-exposure effect in flavour aversion learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 241-252.
– reference: Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. (1996). National Research Council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
– reference: Wasserman, E. A., & Miller, R. R. (1997). What's elementary about associative learning? Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 573-607.
– reference: Chotro, M. G., & Alonso, G. (2003). Stimulus preexposure reduces generalization of conditioned taste aversions between alcohol and non-alcohol flavors in infant rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117, 113-122.
– reference: Cole, K. C., VanTilburg, D., Burch-Vernon, A., & Riccio, D. C. (1996). The importance of context in the US preexposure effect in CTA: Novel versus latently inhibited contextual stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 27, 362-374.
– reference: Arias, C., & Chotro, M. G. (2006). Ethanol-induced preferences or aversions as a function of age in preweanling rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 120, 710-718.
– reference: Arias, C., Pautassi, R. M., Molina, J. C., & Spear, N. E. (2010). A comparison between taste avoidance and conditioned disgust reactions induced by ethanol and lithium chloride in preweanling rats. Developmental Psychobiology, 52, 545-557.
– reference: Gautam, S. H., & Verhagen, J. V. (2010). Evidence that the sweetness of odors depends on experience in rats. Chemical Senses, 35, 767-776.
– volume: 12
  start-page: 307
  year: 1984
  end-page: 315
  article-title: Behavioral CRs elicited by a lithium or an amphetamine‐paired contextual test chamber
  publication-title: Animal Learning and Behavior
– volume: 48
  start-page: 573
  year: 1997
  end-page: 607
  article-title: What's elementary about associative learning?
  publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology
– volume: 1
  start-page: 270
  year: 1975
  end-page: 284
  article-title: Effect of preconditioning unconditioned stimulus experience on learned taste aversions
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
– volume: 17
  start-page: 259
  year: 2010
  end-page: 266
  article-title: Evidence for hippocampus‐dependent contextual learning at postnatal day 17 in the rat
  publication-title: Learning & Memory
– volume: 36
  start-page: 565
  year: 2011
  end-page: 577
  article-title: Ontogenetic differences in sensitivity to LiCl‐ and amphetamine‐induced taste avoidance in preweanling rats
  publication-title: Chemical Senses
– volume: 56
  start-page: 241
  year: 2003
  end-page: 252
  article-title: The role of injection cues in the associative control of the US pre‐exposure effect in flavour aversion learning
  publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
– year: 2001
– volume: 14
  start-page: 221
  year: 1992
  end-page: 228
  article-title: Principles and pitfalls in the analysis of prenatal treatment effects in multiparous species
  publication-title: Neurotoxicology & Teratology
– year: 1996
– volume: 52
  start-page: 545
  year: 2010
  end-page: 557
  article-title: A comparison between taste avoidance and conditioned disgust reactions induced by ethanol and lithium chloride in preweanling rats
  publication-title: Developmental Psychobiology
– volume: 49
  start-page: 565
  year: 2007
  end-page: 575
  article-title: Extinction in the developing rat: An examination of renewal effects
  publication-title: Developmental Psychobiology
– start-page: 58
  year: 2009
  end-page: 73
– volume: 17
  start-page: 34
  year: 1989
  end-page: 42
  article-title: Enhancement of flavor aversion conditioning in weanling but not adult rats by prior conditioning to an odor
  publication-title: Psychobiology
– volume: 112
  start-page: 126
  year: 1998
  end-page: 140
  article-title: A sensory‐enhanced context facilitates learning and multiple measures of unconditioned stimulus processing in the preweanling rat
  publication-title: Behavioral Neuroscience
– volume: 16
  start-page: 13
  year: 1983
  end-page: 22
  article-title: Odor‐aversion learning by rats following LiCl exposure: Ontogenetic influences
  publication-title: Developmental Psychobiology
– volume: 40
  start-page: 51
  year: 2006
  end-page: 59
  article-title: Interactions between prenatal ethanol exposure and postnatal learning about ethanol in rat pups
  publication-title: Alcohol
– volume: 47
  start-page: 55
  year: 2005
  end-page: 65
  article-title: Latent inhibition in the developing rat: An examination of context‐specific effects
  publication-title: Developmental Psychobiology
– volume: 15
  start-page: 709
  year: 1979
  end-page: 720
  article-title: Pre‐exposure to the Cs alone, Us alone, or Cs and Us uncorrelated: Latent inhibition, blocking by context, or learned irrelevance?
  publication-title: Learning and Motivation
– volume: 86
  start-page: 523
  year: 1979
  end-page: 548
  article-title: Associative and nonassociative theories of the UCS preexposure phenomenon: Implications for Pavlovian conditioning
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 17
  start-page: 407
  year: 1984
  end-page: 422
  article-title: Short‐term exposure to an odor increases its subsequent preference in preweanling rats: A descriptive profile of the phenomenon
  publication-title: Developmental Psychobiology
– start-page: 279
  year: 1969
  end-page: 296
– volume: 22
  start-page: 401
  year: 1989
  end-page: 411
  article-title: Anterior and posterior, but not cheek, intraoral cannulation procedures elevate serum corticosterone levels in neonatal rat pups
  publication-title: Developmental Psychobiology
– volume: 35
  start-page: 767
  year: 2010
  end-page: 776
  article-title: Evidence that the sweetness of odors depends on experience in rats
  publication-title: Chemical Senses
– volume: 117
  start-page: 113
  year: 2003
  end-page: 122
  article-title: Stimulus preexposure reduces generalization of conditioned taste aversions between alcohol and non‐alcohol flavors in infant rats
  publication-title: Behavioral Neuroscience
– volume: 108
  start-page: 227
  year: 1994
  end-page: 234
  article-title: Ontogeny of contextual fear conditioning in rats: Implications for consolidation, infantile amnesia, and hippocampal system function
  publication-title: Behavioral Neuroscience
– volume: 33
  start-page: 363
  year: 2005
  end-page: 370
  article-title: The role of habituation of the response to LiCl in the US‐preexposure effect
  publication-title: Learning & Behavior
– volume: 12
  start-page: 321
  year: 1981
  end-page: 341
  article-title: The US preexposure phenomenon in the conditioned suppression paradigm: A role for conditioned situational stimuli
  publication-title: Learning and Motivation
– start-page: 64
  year: 1972
  end-page: 99
– volume: 120
  start-page: 710
  year: 2006
  end-page: 718
  article-title: Ethanol‐induced preferences or aversions as a function of age in preweanling rats
  publication-title: Behavioral Neuroscience
– volume: 27
  start-page: 362
  year: 1996
  end-page: 374
  article-title: The importance of context in the US preexposure effect in CTA: Novel versus latently inhibited contextual stimuli
  publication-title: Learning and Motivation
– volume: 52
  start-page: 109
  year: 2010
  end-page: 120
  article-title: The effect of taste familiarity on intake and taste reactivity in infant rats
  publication-title: Developmental Psychobiology
– volume: 30
  start-page: 58
  year: 2004
  end-page: 66
  article-title: The US‐preexposure effect in lithium‐induced flavor‐aversion conditioning is a consequence of blocking by injection cues
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
– volume: 3
  start-page: 189
  year: 1977
  end-page: 201
  article-title: Illness‐alone exposure as a source of interference with the acquisition and retention of a taste aversion
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
– volume: 112
  start-page: 1142
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1151
  article-title: Illness‐induced context aversion learning in rats with lesions of the dorsal hippocampus
  publication-title: Behavioral Neuroscience
– volume: 9
  start-page: 524
  year: 1981
  end-page: 532
  article-title: Generality of US preexposure effects: Transfer from food to shock or shock to food with and without the same response requirements
  publication-title: Animal Learning & Behavior
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1006/lmot.1996.0021
– ident: e_1_2_7_33_1
  doi: 10.1002/dev.420220407
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2006.10.002
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.1.58
– volume-title: Handbook of contemporary learning theories
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.523
– start-page: 279
  volume-title: Punishment and aversive behavior
  year: 1969
  ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
– start-page: 58
  volume-title: Conditioned taste aversion: Behavioral and neural processes
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_34_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.573
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1002/dev.20460
– start-page: 64
  volume-title: Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory
  year: 1972
  ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1101/lm.1755810
– volume: 15
  start-page: 709
  year: 1979
  ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  article-title: Pre‐exposure to the Cs alone, Us alone, or Cs and Us uncorrelated: Latent inhibition, blocking by context, or learned irrelevance?
  publication-title: Learning and Motivation
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1002/dev.20418
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjq075
– volume: 17
  start-page: 34
  year: 1989
  ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  article-title: Enhancement of flavor aversion conditioning in weanling but not adult rats by prior conditioning to an odor
  publication-title: Psychobiology
  doi: 10.3758/BF03337815
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.112.1.126
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.1.113
– volume-title: National Research Council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.112.5.1142
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.3.710
– volume: 108
  start-page: 227
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_7_32_1
  article-title: Ontogeny of contextual fear conditioning in rats: Implications for consolidation, infantile amnesia, and hippocampal system function
  publication-title: Behavioral Neuroscience
  doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.108.2.227
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.3758/BF03192864
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
  doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.3.2.189
– ident: e_1_2_7_35_1
  doi: 10.1002/dev.20074
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
  doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(81)90012-6
– ident: e_1_2_7_36_1
  doi: 10.1002/dev.20244
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1002/dev.420170407
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.1.3.270
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
  doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjr026
– ident: e_1_2_7_31_1
  doi: 10.1002/dev.420160103
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(92)90020-B
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  doi: 10.3758/BF03199972
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.3758/BF03209785
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1080/02724990244000115
SSID ssj0011487
Score 1.9854668
Snippet The unconditioned stimulus preexposure effect (US‐PE) is defined as an attenuation of the conditioned response after preexposure to the US prior to...
The unconditioned stimulus preexposure effect (US-PE) is defined as an attenuation of the conditioned response after preexposure to the US prior to...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 808
SubjectTerms Animals
associative learning
Avoidance Learning - drug effects
Avoidance Learning - physiology
Conditioning, Classical - drug effects
Conditioning, Classical - physiology
Cues
Extinction, Psychological - drug effects
Extinction, Psychological - physiology
Female
infant
Lithium Chloride - pharmacology
Male
Odorants
Rats
rodent
Taste - drug effects
Taste - physiology
taste-aversion
US preexposure effect
Title Signaling the unconditioned stimulus during the preexposure phase does not attenuate the unconditioned stimulus preexposure effect in preweanling rats
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-RKNFXS61-H/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fdev.21001
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22213476
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1143873876
Volume 54
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwED9NmyaNBwblqwyQQQjtJV1iN1_iCbGVCkQfNgYVQrIcxxnTRlI1zRj8Ify93NlN2NBACCkPVny2nPjO97N9_hngqVE80YkJvUjlOEEJeeElxldo7lGB_i0QeU5LA28n0fhw-HoaTlfgeXsWxvFDdAtuZBl2vCYDV1m984s0NDdnA04MQjj-BiIi3vzd_Y46imC-48sMuIeYw29ZhXy-05W85IvW6LeeXwU0L-NW63hGm_CpbbKLNzkZNItsoL__xub4n990A64vASl74TToJqyYsgfr7orKbz24doGwsAcb3XiJWesfK5u6BT8Ojo8I0JdHDPEkQ1dZ0U44kSDlDMeQL81pUzN3ItJKzObGnM8qWp1ks8_oSFlemZqV1YIR32fZIAL-W1UXy7uIFHZc0tuvRpW2HajY9W04HO29ezn2lhc-eFpEIvAyntP8RZgk5Rk-fqGV9tPCT1WhMjUUkV-IvAiV0nkwDDSiR4R3PNVBHCcZ98UdWC2xPfeAcR3zQilUtyFd956qJCV0K1QRZaEK0j5st10v9ZINnS7lOJWOx5lL7Atp-6IPTzrRmaMAuUromdWfTkLNTyhmLg7lh8kruf9mMpoeRIEc9-Fxq2ASLZm2Z1Rpqqam8-EiifGJ-nDXaV5XG6I4OvOLOdtWf_7cELm7994m7v-76BZscGsnFKXzAFYX88Y8RKy1yB5Zo_oJIFommQ
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VVhXlwGOBsjwNQqiXbBPnLXFBtMtC2z30ASskZDmO01YtyWp3A4Ufwu9lxt6EFhWEkHKw4rHlxDOez_b4M8BzLXmiEh06kcxxghLywkm0K9HcowL9m-fnOS0N7AyjwUHwbhSOFuBlcxbG8kO0C25kGWa8JgOnBen1X6yhuf7S40QhdAWWAgQaNPXa2G3JowjoW8ZMjzuIOtyGV8jl623RC95oiX7s2WVQ8yJyNa6nfwM-NY22EScnvXqW9dT33_gc__erbsL1OSZlr6wS3YIFXXZg2d5S-a0D185xFnZgpR0yMWv5Y2VSt-HH3vEhYfrykCGkZOgtK9oMJx6knOEw8rk-rafMHoo0EuOJ1mfjihYo2fgIfSnLKz1lZTVjRPlZ1giC_1bV-fI2KIUdl_T2q5alaQfq9vQOHPQ3918PnPmdD47yI99zMp7TFMbXScozfNxCSeWmhZvKQmYy8CO38PMilFLlXuApBJCI8HiqvDhOMu76d2GxxPbcA8ZVzAspUeMCuvE9lUlKANeXRZSF0ku7sNb0vVBzQnS6l-NUWCpnLrAvhOmLLjxrRceWBeQyoRdGgVoJOTmhsLk4FB-Gb8Tu1rA_2os8MejC00bDBBoz7dDIUlf1lI6I-0mMT9SFVat6bW0I5OjYL-asGQX6c0PExuZ7k7j_76JP4Opgf2dbbL8dbj2AFW6MhoJ2HsLibFLrRwi9ZtljY2E_AXPZKrg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3bbtQwEB2VVkXlgctyW64GIdSXbBPnLp4Q7bJQWKGWwgohRY5jl6oliXY3UPgQvpcZexNaVBBCyoMVjy0nnvEc2-NjgEdK8EQmKnQiUeAEJeTaSZQr0Nwjjf7N84uClgZej6PRXvByEk6W4El7FsbyQ3QLbmQZZrwmA68LvfGLNLRQXwacGITOwUoQIZIgRLTTcUcRzreEmR53EHS4La2Qyze6oqec0Qr91-OzkOZp4Go8z_ASfGzbbANODgfNPB_I77_ROf7nR12GiwtEyp5aFboCS6rswaq9o_JbDy6cYCzswVo3YGLW6ofKpK7Cj92DfUL05T5DQMnQV1a0FU4sSAXDQeRzc9TMmD0SaSTqqVLHdUXLk6z-hJ6UFZWasbKaMyL8LBuEwH-r6mR5G5LCDkp6-1WJ0rQDNXt2DfaGW2-fjZzFjQ-O9CPfc3Je0ATGV0nKc3xcLYV0U-2mQotcBH7kar_QoRCy8AJPInxEfMdT6cVxknPXvw7LJbbnJjAuY66FQH0L6L73VCQpwVtf6CgPhZf2Yb3t-kwu6NDpVo6jzBI58wz7IjN90YeHnWhtOUDOEnps9KeTENNDCpqLw-z9-Hm2sz0eTnYjLxv14UGrYBmaMu3PiFJVzYwOiPtJjE_UhxtW87raEMbRoV_MWTf68-eGZJtb70zi1r-L3ofzbzaH2asX4-3bsMaNyVDEzh1Ynk8bdRdx1zy_Z-zrJ9scKWc
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Signaling+the+unconditioned+stimulus+during+the+preexposure+phase+does+not+attenuate+the+unconditioned+stimulus+preexposure+effect+in+preweanling+rats&rft.jtitle=Developmental+psychobiology&rft.au=Castello%2C+Stefania&rft.au=Bobbio%2C+Antonella&rft.au=Orellana%2C+Estefania&rft.au=Arias%2C+Carlos&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc.%2C+A+Wiley+Company&rft.issn=0012-1630&rft.eissn=1098-2302&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=808&rft.epage=817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fdev.21001&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=ark_67375_WNG_RKNFXS61_H
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0012-1630&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0012-1630&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0012-1630&client=summon