A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Suture Materials Used for Arthroscopic Shoulder Procedures
To evaluate the viscoelastic properties of 4 commercially available cord-like sutures and 2 commercially available suture tapes when subjected to physiological loads, as well as to compare them with each other and to identify the clinically most desirable combination of suture material properties. S...
Saved in:
Published in | Arthroscopy Vol. 36; no. 3; pp. 708 - 713 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.03.2020
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To evaluate the viscoelastic properties of 4 commercially available cord-like sutures and 2 commercially available suture tapes when subjected to physiological loads, as well as to compare them with each other and to identify the clinically most desirable combination of suture material properties.
Six suture materials (Ethibond, FiberWire, FiberTape, Orthocord, Ultrabraid, and Ultratape) underwent creep testing (n = 7, 60 N, 10 minutes) to determine specimen stiffness, initial elongation at 60 N of load, static creep (during 10 minutes of loading), and relaxed elongation (material recovery 3 minutes after removal of load). Furthermore, cyclic testing (n = 7, 10-45 N, 0.5 Hz, 500 cycles) was carried out to determine dynamic creep, peak-to-peak displacement, and relaxed elongation. Mechanical testing was conducted on a material testing machine in 37°C phosphate-buffered saline solution.
FiberTape showed the greatest stiffness (23.9 ± 3.2 N/mm, P < .001), the smallest amounts of static (0.38 ± 0.10 mm, P < .001) and dynamic (0.16 ± 0.09 mm, P = .003) creep, and the smallest peak-to-peak displacement (0.20 ± 0.02 mm, P < .001). FiberTape and FiberWire showed the smallest initial elongation (1.17 ± 0.17 mm and 1.63 ± 0.25 mm, respectively; P < .001). Ultrabraid showed the greatest relaxed elongation, both statically (4.73 ± 0.73 mm, P < .001) and dynamically (4.18 ± 0.83 mm, P = .002).
FiberTape consistently displayed less creep, greater stiffness, and less extensibility than the other suture types. Ultrabraid showed the largest amount of relaxed elongation on both static and dynamic testing.
When considering high stiffness in combination with low initial extension and low static creep to be ideal parameters to achieve optimal initial construct stability and considering low dynamic creep in combination with low peak-to-peak displacement to be ideal conditions for the repetitive loading of the construct during the healing process, tapes seem to be superior to cord-like sutures for performing rotator cuff repair. |
---|---|
AbstractList | PURPOSETo evaluate the viscoelastic properties of 4 commercially available cord-like sutures and 2 commercially available suture tapes when subjected to physiological loads, as well as to compare them with each other and to identify the clinically most desirable combination of suture material properties. METHODSSix suture materials (Ethibond, FiberWire, FiberTape, Orthocord, Ultrabraid, and Ultratape) underwent creep testing (n = 7, 60 N, 10 minutes) to determine specimen stiffness, initial elongation at 60 N of load, static creep (during 10 minutes of loading), and relaxed elongation (material recovery 3 minutes after removal of load). Furthermore, cyclic testing (n = 7, 10-45 N, 0.5 Hz, 500 cycles) was carried out to determine dynamic creep, peak-to-peak displacement, and relaxed elongation. Mechanical testing was conducted on a material testing machine in 37°C phosphate-buffered saline solution. RESULTSFiberTape showed the greatest stiffness (23.9 ± 3.2 N/mm, P < .001), the smallest amounts of static (0.38 ± 0.10 mm, P < .001) and dynamic (0.16 ± 0.09 mm, P = .003) creep, and the smallest peak-to-peak displacement (0.20 ± 0.02 mm, P < .001). FiberTape and FiberWire showed the smallest initial elongation (1.17 ± 0.17 mm and 1.63 ± 0.25 mm, respectively; P < .001). Ultrabraid showed the greatest relaxed elongation, both statically (4.73 ± 0.73 mm, P < .001) and dynamically (4.18 ± 0.83 mm, P = .002). CONCLUSIONSFiberTape consistently displayed less creep, greater stiffness, and less extensibility than the other suture types. Ultrabraid showed the largest amount of relaxed elongation on both static and dynamic testing. CLINICAL RELEVANCEWhen considering high stiffness in combination with low initial extension and low static creep to be ideal parameters to achieve optimal initial construct stability and considering low dynamic creep in combination with low peak-to-peak displacement to be ideal conditions for the repetitive loading of the construct during the healing process, tapes seem to be superior to cord-like sutures for performing rotator cuff repair. To evaluate the viscoelastic properties of 4 commercially available cord-like sutures and 2 commercially available suture tapes when subjected to physiological loads, as well as to compare them with each other and to identify the clinically most desirable combination of suture material properties. Six suture materials (Ethibond, FiberWire, FiberTape, Orthocord, Ultrabraid, and Ultratape) underwent creep testing (n = 7, 60 N, 10 minutes) to determine specimen stiffness, initial elongation at 60 N of load, static creep (during 10 minutes of loading), and relaxed elongation (material recovery 3 minutes after removal of load). Furthermore, cyclic testing (n = 7, 10-45 N, 0.5 Hz, 500 cycles) was carried out to determine dynamic creep, peak-to-peak displacement, and relaxed elongation. Mechanical testing was conducted on a material testing machine in 37°C phosphate-buffered saline solution. FiberTape showed the greatest stiffness (23.9 ± 3.2 N/mm, P < .001), the smallest amounts of static (0.38 ± 0.10 mm, P < .001) and dynamic (0.16 ± 0.09 mm, P = .003) creep, and the smallest peak-to-peak displacement (0.20 ± 0.02 mm, P < .001). FiberTape and FiberWire showed the smallest initial elongation (1.17 ± 0.17 mm and 1.63 ± 0.25 mm, respectively; P < .001). Ultrabraid showed the greatest relaxed elongation, both statically (4.73 ± 0.73 mm, P < .001) and dynamically (4.18 ± 0.83 mm, P = .002). FiberTape consistently displayed less creep, greater stiffness, and less extensibility than the other suture types. Ultrabraid showed the largest amount of relaxed elongation on both static and dynamic testing. When considering high stiffness in combination with low initial extension and low static creep to be ideal parameters to achieve optimal initial construct stability and considering low dynamic creep in combination with low peak-to-peak displacement to be ideal conditions for the repetitive loading of the construct during the healing process, tapes seem to be superior to cord-like sutures for performing rotator cuff repair. |
Author | Taha, Mohy E. Cass, Benjamin Cunningham, Gregory O’Briain, David E. Young, Allan A. Schneider, Kerstin Clarke, Elizabeth C. Smith, Margaret M. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Mohy E. surname: Taha fullname: Taha, Mohy E. organization: Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland – sequence: 2 givenname: Kerstin surname: Schneider fullname: Schneider, Kerstin email: schneider.kerstin@gmx.ch organization: Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Schulthess Clinic Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland – sequence: 3 givenname: Elizabeth C. surname: Clarke fullname: Clarke, Elizabeth C. organization: Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia – sequence: 4 givenname: David E. surname: O’Briain fullname: O’Briain, David E. organization: Department of Orthopaedic Service, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland – sequence: 5 givenname: Margaret M. surname: Smith fullname: Smith, Margaret M. organization: Raymond Purves Research Labs, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia – sequence: 6 givenname: Gregory orcidid: 0000-0002-8706-0211 surname: Cunningham fullname: Cunningham, Gregory organization: Shoulder Center, Hirslanden Clinique la Colline, Geneva, Switzerland – sequence: 7 givenname: Benjamin surname: Cass fullname: Cass, Benjamin organization: Sydney Shoulder Research Institute, Sydney, Australia – sequence: 8 givenname: Allan A. surname: Young fullname: Young, Allan A. organization: Sydney Shoulder Research Institute, Sydney, Australia |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727418$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kMFu1DAQhi1URLcLb4CQj1wSxnYS2xekZYEWqQik0rPlOGOtV0m82AlS3x6XLRw5zeX_5p_5rsjFHGck5DWDmgHr3h1rm5ZDijUHpmtQNTTqGdmwlneV4IJdkA3IRlcKOnFJrnI-AoAQSrwgl4JJLhumNqTf0Q8hTugOdg7OjnQfp5NNIceZRk8_Bu8x4bzQu3VZE9KvdsEU7JjpfcaB-pjo7s8Z2cVTcPTuENdxwES_p-hwKEh-SZ77AuCrp7kl958__djfVLffrr_sd7eVEx1fKt0z1lvFWst72bcofAteaQTgXEscwGrNZMO1k2xQnRC81Z0buJdM2FY2YkvenveeUvy5Yl7MFLLDcbQzxjWb4qRlwHWRsyXNOerK4TmhN6cUJpseDAPzaNcczdmuebRrQJlit2BvnhrWfsLhH_RXZwm8Pwew_PkrYDLZBZyLiJDQLWaI4f8NvwEfwY79 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13051426 crossref_primary_10_1097_CORR_0000000000001806 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_023_06041_z crossref_primary_10_1177_03635465231181059 crossref_primary_10_1186_s43019_022_00167_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asmr_2023_100872 crossref_primary_10_3390_ma15072573 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2022_01_126 crossref_primary_10_4103_atr_atr_24_22 crossref_primary_10_1177_03635465211001095 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jor_2024_01_011 crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2024_1340482 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2021_05_060 crossref_primary_10_5435_JAAOS_D_20_00591 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xrrt_2022_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jseint_2021_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40634_020_00321_y crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11226870 crossref_primary_10_5397_cise_2022_00913 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asmr_2021_07_014 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0042_1750047 crossref_primary_10_5397_cise_2023_00052 crossref_primary_10_1177_0363546521998318 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2019_12_009 |
Cites_doi | 10.1302/2046-3758.62.BJR-2016-0225.R1 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.030 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.211 10.1177/0363546510382835 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.012 10.1016/j.rbo.2016.05.002 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.021 10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.902 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.004 10.2106/JBJS.K.00117 10.1177/0363546509332816 10.1177/0363546515594449 10.1302/0301-620X.74B4.1624521 10.2106/00004623-200611000-00015 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.005 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.05.023 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.140 10.1177/2325967117701212 10.1016/j.jos.2016.07.001 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America – notice: Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1526-3231 |
EndPage | 713 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_arthro_2019_08_048 31727418 S074980631930790X |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --K .1- .FO .GJ 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~5 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AALRI AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAXUO ABLJU ABMAC ADBBV ADMUD ADPAM AEVXI AFCTW AFRHN AFTJW AGZHU AHHHB AITUG AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALXNB AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BELOY C5W CAG COF EBS EFJIC EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB G-2 GBLVA HEE HEK HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M28 M31 M41 MO0 N9A NQ- O9- OF~ OR- R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAE SEL SES SEW SJN SSZ UHS UV1 WUQ XH2 YCJ Z5R ZA5 ZXP AFJKZ NPM AAYXX ACRPL ADNMO CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-9b11ba815a2b7b5e3f50f89e002297ed0a9917429c71d86332596cd2f713a5743 |
ISSN | 0749-8063 |
IngestDate | Wed Dec 04 03:55:05 EST 2024 Fri Dec 06 02:56:52 EST 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:29:18 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 02:48:41 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c362t-9b11ba815a2b7b5e3f50f89e002297ed0a9917429c71d86332596cd2f713a5743 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-8706-0211 |
PMID | 31727418 |
PQID | 2315102932 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2315102932 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2019_08_048 pubmed_primary_31727418 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_arthro_2019_08_048 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | March 2020 2020-03-00 20200301 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2020 text: March 2020 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Arthroscopy |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Arthroscopy |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Park, Park, Kim, Oh (bib12) 2015; 43 Huntington, Coles-Black, Richardson, Sobol (bib17) 2018; 49 Nagra, Zargar, Smith, Carr (bib8) 2017; 6 Tashjian, Hollins, Kim (bib14) 2010; 38 Collin, Laubster, Denard, Akuè, Lädermann (bib6) 2016; 102 Strauss, Frank, Kubiak, Kummer, Rokito (bib18) 2009; 25 Miyazaki, Santos, Sella, Checchia, Salata, Checchia (bib1) 2017; 52 Early, Elias, Lippitt, Filipkowski, Pedowitz, Ciccone (bib7) 2017; 26 Sambandam, Khanna, Gul, Mounasamy (bib13) 2015; 6 Abtahi, Granger, Tashjian (bib3) 2015; 6 Hurwit, Fanton, Tella, Behn, Hunt (bib10) 2014; 30 Sward, Hughes, Amis, Wallace (bib19) 1992; 74 Hinse, Ménard, Rouleau, Canet, Beauchamp (bib5) 2016; 21 Jordan, Boelch, Jansen, Meffert, Hoelscher-Doht (bib11) 2016; 49 Liu, Lam, Shepherd, Murrell (bib4) 2017; 5 Barber, Howard, Piccirillo, Spenciner (bib15) 2019; 35 Smith, Alexander, Hill (bib16) 2006; 88 Jost, Khair, Chen, Wright, Kelly, Rodeo (bib2) 2012; 94 Swan, Baldini, McCarty (bib9) 2009; 37 32139050 - Arthroscopy. 2020 Mar;36(3):714-715 Jost (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib2) 2012; 94 Abtahi (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib3) 2015; 6 Huntington (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib17) 2018; 49 Jordan (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib11) 2016; 49 Barber (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib15) 2019; 35 Smith (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib16) 2006; 88 Park (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib12) 2015; 43 Hinse (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib5) 2016; 21 Hurwit (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib10) 2014; 30 Tashjian (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib14) 2010; 38 Swan (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib9) 2009; 37 Early (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib7) 2017; 26 Sward (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib19) 1992; 74 Liu (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib4) 2017; 5 Sambandam (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib13) 2015; 6 Miyazaki (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib1) 2017; 52 Collin (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib6) 2016; 102 Nagra (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib8) 2017; 6 Strauss (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib18) 2009; 25 |
References_xml | – volume: 30 start-page: 1406 year: 2014 end-page: 1412 ident: bib10 article-title: Viscoelastic properties of common suture material used for rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic procedures publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Hunt – volume: 35 start-page: 1163 year: 2019 end-page: 1169 ident: bib15 article-title: A biomechanical comparison of six suture configurations for soft tissue-based graft traction and fixation publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Spenciner – volume: 74 start-page: 585 year: 1992 end-page: 588 ident: bib19 article-title: The strength of surgical repairs of the rotator cuff. A biomechanical study on cadavers publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br contributor: fullname: Wallace – volume: 49 start-page: 2607 year: 2016 end-page: 2612 ident: bib11 article-title: Does plastic suture deformation induce gapping after tendon repair? A biomechanical comparison of different suture materials publication-title: J Biomech contributor: fullname: Hoelscher-Doht – volume: 43 start-page: 2386 year: 2015 end-page: 2392 ident: bib12 article-title: Prognostic factors affecting rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic repair in small to medium-sized tears publication-title: Am J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Oh – volume: 5 year: 2017 ident: bib4 article-title: Tape versus suture in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Biomechanical analysis and assessment of failure rates at 6 months publication-title: Orthop J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Murrell – volume: 102 start-page: 293 year: 2016 end-page: 296 ident: bib6 article-title: The Nice knot as an improvement on current knot options: A mechanical analysis publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res contributor: fullname: Lädermann – volume: 37 start-page: 1578 year: 2009 end-page: 1585 ident: bib9 article-title: Arthroscopic suture material and knot type: An updated biomechanical analysis publication-title: Am J Sports Med contributor: fullname: McCarty – volume: 94 year: 2012 ident: bib2 article-title: Suture number determines strength of rotator cuff repair publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am contributor: fullname: Rodeo – volume: 49 start-page: 2047 year: 2018 end-page: 2052 ident: bib17 article-title: The use of suture-tape and suture-wire in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A comparative biomechanics study publication-title: Injury contributor: fullname: Sobol – volume: 52 start-page: 164 year: 2017 end-page: 168 ident: bib1 article-title: Evaluation of the functional results after rotator cuff arthroscopic repair with the suture bridge technique publication-title: Rev Bras Ortop contributor: fullname: Checchia – volume: 88 start-page: 2425 year: 2006 end-page: 2431 ident: bib16 article-title: A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am contributor: fullname: Hill – volume: 21 start-page: 732 year: 2016 end-page: 738 ident: bib5 article-title: Biomechanical study comparing 3 fixation methods for rotator cuff massive tear: Transosseous No. 2 suture, transosseous braided tape, and double-row publication-title: J Orthop Sci contributor: fullname: Beauchamp – volume: 26 start-page: 337 year: 2017 end-page: 342 ident: bib7 article-title: Suture spanning augmentation of single-row rotator cuff repair: A biomechanical analysis publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg contributor: fullname: Ciccone – volume: 6 start-page: 902 year: 2015 end-page: 918 ident: bib13 article-title: Rotator cuff tears: An evidence based approach publication-title: World J Orthop contributor: fullname: Mounasamy – volume: 38 start-page: 2435 year: 2010 end-page: 2442 ident: bib14 article-title: Factors affecting healing rates after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair publication-title: Am J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Kim – volume: 6 start-page: 82 year: 2017 end-page: 89 ident: bib8 article-title: Mechanical properties of all-suture anchors for rotator cuff repair publication-title: Bone Joint Res contributor: fullname: Carr – volume: 25 start-page: 597 year: 2009 end-page: 602 ident: bib18 article-title: The effect of the angle of suture anchor insertion on fixation failure at the tendon-suture interface after rotator cuff repair: Deadman's angle revisited publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Rokito – volume: 6 start-page: 211 year: 2015 end-page: 220 ident: bib3 article-title: Factors affecting healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair publication-title: World J Orthop contributor: fullname: Tashjian – volume: 6 start-page: 82 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib8 article-title: Mechanical properties of all-suture anchors for rotator cuff repair publication-title: Bone Joint Res doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.62.BJR-2016-0225.R1 contributor: fullname: Nagra – volume: 30 start-page: 1406 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib10 article-title: Viscoelastic properties of common suture material used for rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic procedures publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.030 contributor: fullname: Hurwit – volume: 6 start-page: 211 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib3 article-title: Factors affecting healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair publication-title: World J Orthop doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.211 contributor: fullname: Abtahi – volume: 38 start-page: 2435 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib14 article-title: Factors affecting healing rates after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546510382835 contributor: fullname: Tashjian – volume: 26 start-page: 337 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib7 article-title: Suture spanning augmentation of single-row rotator cuff repair: A biomechanical analysis publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.012 contributor: fullname: Early – volume: 52 start-page: 164 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib1 article-title: Evaluation of the functional results after rotator cuff arthroscopic repair with the suture bridge technique publication-title: Rev Bras Ortop doi: 10.1016/j.rbo.2016.05.002 contributor: fullname: Miyazaki – volume: 25 start-page: 597 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib18 article-title: The effect of the angle of suture anchor insertion on fixation failure at the tendon-suture interface after rotator cuff repair: Deadman's angle revisited publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.021 contributor: fullname: Strauss – volume: 6 start-page: 902 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib13 article-title: Rotator cuff tears: An evidence based approach publication-title: World J Orthop doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.902 contributor: fullname: Sambandam – volume: 49 start-page: 2047 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib17 article-title: The use of suture-tape and suture-wire in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A comparative biomechanics study publication-title: Injury doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.004 contributor: fullname: Huntington – volume: 94 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib2 article-title: Suture number determines strength of rotator cuff repair publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00117 contributor: fullname: Jost – volume: 37 start-page: 1578 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib9 article-title: Arthroscopic suture material and knot type: An updated biomechanical analysis publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546509332816 contributor: fullname: Swan – volume: 43 start-page: 2386 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib12 article-title: Prognostic factors affecting rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic repair in small to medium-sized tears publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546515594449 contributor: fullname: Park – volume: 74 start-page: 585 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib19 article-title: The strength of surgical repairs of the rotator cuff. A biomechanical study on cadavers publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B4.1624521 contributor: fullname: Sward – volume: 88 start-page: 2425 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib16 article-title: A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/00004623-200611000-00015 contributor: fullname: Smith – volume: 102 start-page: 293 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib6 article-title: The Nice knot as an improvement on current knot options: A mechanical analysis publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.005 contributor: fullname: Collin – volume: 49 start-page: 2607 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib11 article-title: Does plastic suture deformation induce gapping after tendon repair? A biomechanical comparison of different suture materials publication-title: J Biomech doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.05.023 contributor: fullname: Jordan – volume: 35 start-page: 1163 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib15 article-title: A biomechanical comparison of six suture configurations for soft tissue-based graft traction and fixation publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.140 contributor: fullname: Barber – volume: 5 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib4 article-title: Tape versus suture in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Biomechanical analysis and assessment of failure rates at 6 months publication-title: Orthop J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/2325967117701212 contributor: fullname: Liu – volume: 21 start-page: 732 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048_bib5 article-title: Biomechanical study comparing 3 fixation methods for rotator cuff massive tear: Transosseous No. 2 suture, transosseous braided tape, and double-row publication-title: J Orthop Sci doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.07.001 contributor: fullname: Hinse |
SSID | ssj0003383 |
Score | 2.462096 |
Snippet | To evaluate the viscoelastic properties of 4 commercially available cord-like sutures and 2 commercially available suture tapes when subjected to physiological... PURPOSETo evaluate the viscoelastic properties of 4 commercially available cord-like sutures and 2 commercially available suture tapes when subjected to... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 708 |
Title | A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Suture Materials Used for Arthroscopic Shoulder Procedures |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727418 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2315102932 |
Volume | 36 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Nb9MwFLegu3BBTOOjwJCRuE2p8uUkPmbTxoTacViKerNsx1E3aSlqswP89bwXOx-wTQwuURXVluv36_Pv2e_nR8gnVHaFfqk9JlPtxariHo_T0ktNmTBmjPQlbg0sLpLzZfxlxVZ_qEsaNdM_79WV_I9V4R3YFVWy_2DZvlN4AZ_BvvAEC8PzUTbOsZTkjUHxbjvXJ-OiguDNbO2TBrxDe06wkI0d1dFyBzwTEwzzLdZJQGnKlT66XGO9a7O16oESmuzG3HX4br8NX0h7XrTYrH8MmoZLva7x-iybroH88qqH4JAP1CeUDRu1mHlzDCO09xq06fauV7cvAUFon5g1M86XhokXhc7JO2drbztxoIpGnjP1s9EinFqB6h3_brcarmey_cWYmcfbG1jjbFjPujP8i6_ibDmfi-J0VTwle3hTYjwhe5-P59_yfrHGCL1TVLZpf3d7foixPBSRtMykeEGeu5CC5hYf--SJqQ-Iyulv2KADNuimoj02qMUG7bFBERsUsEHH2KAdNuiAjZdkeXZanJx7rp6Gp4GmNB5XQaBkFjAZqlQxE1XMrzJukMdx-HP6EoKFFAiKToMyS6IIQuNEl2EF1pAMqOYrMqk3tXlDaMlZZFRSRjwwsZYlr3SFIu8EhSG-TqbE6-ZMfLfXpogun_Ba2DkWOMcCi6DG2ZSk3cQKR_0spRNg-b-0_NjZQYBnxOMuWZvN7U4A8mDBATobTslra6B-LBHy9jjI3j6i9TvybMD3ezJptrfmEJhooz44NP0CScyOnQ |
link.rule.ids | 314,780,784,27924,27925 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Biomechanical+Comparison+of+Different+Suture+Materials+Used+for+Arthroscopic+Shoulder+Procedures&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Taha%2C+Mohy+E&rft.au=Schneider%2C+Kerstin&rft.au=Clarke%2C+Elizabeth+C&rft.au=O%27Briain%2C+David+E&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=708&rft.epage=713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.arthro.2019.08.048&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0749-8063&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0749-8063&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0749-8063&client=summon |