Explaining Factors Leading to Community Acceptance of Wind Energy. Results of an Expert Assessment

The present article deals with two key drivers of social acceptance of wind energy: procedural justice and distributional justice. It is based on a comparative expert assessment carried out in the frame of the Horizon 2020 project WinWind covering six European countries. The focus of the paper is on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnergies (Basel) Vol. 13; no. 8; p. 2119
Main Authors De Luca, Elena, Nardi, Cecilia, Giuffrida, Laura Gaetana, Krug, Michael, Di Nucci, Maria Rosaria
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.04.2020
Subjects
Acceptance
Alternative energy sources
Community
Decision making
Energy industry
Energy policy
Industrial plant emissions
Literature reviews
participation
Public involvement
Public participation
Renewable resources
social acceptance
Turbines
wind energy
Wind farms
Wind power
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract The present article deals with two key drivers of social acceptance of wind energy: procedural justice and distributional justice. It is based on a comparative expert assessment carried out in the frame of the Horizon 2020 project WinWind covering six European countries. The focus of the paper is on procedural and financial participation of citizens and local stakeholders in wind energy projects. The first part covers institutional arrangements for public engagement in two areas of the decision-making process—wind turbine zoning/siting in spatial plans and authorization procedures. Here, three levels of public involvement—information, consultation and participation—were analyzed. The second part examines active and financial participation of citizens and local stakeholders. Here, we distinguish between two different modes of governance: institutionalized forms of public governance and voluntary forms of corporate governance. The outcomes suggest that concrete paths to the social acceptance of wind energy are fostered via appropriate institutional spaces for public engagement. Furthermore, missing opportunities for active and passive financial participation can have strong negative consequences for community acceptance
AbstractList The present article deals with two key drivers of social acceptance of wind energy: procedural justice and distributional justice. It is based on a comparative expert assessment carried out in the frame of the Horizon 2020 project WinWind covering six European countries. The focus of the paper is on procedural and financial participation of citizens and local stakeholders in wind energy projects. The first part covers institutional arrangements for public engagement in two areas of the decision-making process—wind turbine zoning/siting in spatial plans and authorization procedures. Here, three levels of public involvement—information, consultation and participation—were analyzed. The second part examines active and financial participation of citizens and local stakeholders. Here, we distinguish between two different modes of governance: institutionalized forms of public governance and voluntary forms of corporate governance. The outcomes suggest that concrete paths to the social acceptance of wind energy are fostered via appropriate institutional spaces for public engagement. Furthermore, missing opportunities for active and passive financial participation can have strong negative consequences for community acceptance
Author Giuffrida, Laura Gaetana
Di Nucci, Maria Rosaria
Krug, Michael
Nardi, Cecilia
De Luca, Elena
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Elena
  surname: De Luca
  fullname: De Luca, Elena
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Cecilia
  surname: Nardi
  fullname: Nardi, Cecilia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Laura Gaetana
  surname: Giuffrida
  fullname: Giuffrida, Laura Gaetana
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Krug
  fullname: Krug, Michael
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Maria Rosaria
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0833-8247
  surname: Di Nucci
  fullname: Di Nucci, Maria Rosaria
BookMark eNpNUU1LAzEQDaLg58VfEPAmtCadbXZzLKV-QEEQxWOYZCdlS5vUJAX7791aUecyM4_Hm8e8c3YcYiDGrqUYAmhxR0GCaEZS6iN2JrVWAylqOP43n7KrnJeiLwAJAGfMzj43K-xCFxb8Hl2JKfM5YbvfS-TTuF5vQ1d2fOIcbQoGRzx6_t6Fls8CpcVuyF8ob1cl73EMvBekVPgkZ8p5TaFcshOPq0xXP_2Cvd3PXqePg_nzw9N0Mh84ULIMsO6dt44UKFXbRmEjtKzGIyGst45q54RqBap2RE6SV60H7aixPUfjGBu4YE8H3Tbi0mxSt8a0MxE78w3EtDCYSudWZEgSeiFqa8FWXhBS_7eGGgDrsSLRa90ctDYpfmwpF7OM2xR6-2YEelxVWo73rNsDy6WYcyL_e1UKs4_E_EUCX_whgA4
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_4000_vertigo_32199
crossref_primary_10_3390_su13063178
crossref_primary_10_3390_en16073270
crossref_primary_10_3390_en15144934
crossref_primary_10_3390_su14127181
crossref_primary_10_3390_su13126755
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2022_112479
crossref_primary_10_14512_rur_150
crossref_primary_10_3390_su13179951
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_erss_2023_103044
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enpol_2022_113360
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_erss_2023_103098
crossref_primary_10_3389_frsc_2022_1005065
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13705_022_00365_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enpol_2024_114199
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enpol_2023_113664
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.003
10.1080/00045608.2011.568879
10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024
10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.035
10.1057/9780230286672
10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.082
10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.003
10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.048
10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.089
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.006
10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.097
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.062
10.1177/0306312717709363
10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002
10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.003
10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.07.005
10.1186/s13705-014-0022-8
10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294
10.3390/su12051754
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.057
10.1146/annurev-environ-060311-133915
10.4337/relp.2020.04.02
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.043
10.1177/0013916515605562
10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.026
10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
10.1080/09640568.2015.1133406
10.1080/1523908X.2017.1418656
10.1080/09644010500175833
10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.037
10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.041
10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.145
10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.017
10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.033
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.040
10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.025
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.063
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
PIMPY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
DOA
DOI 10.3390/en13082119
DatabaseName CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Central China
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database
CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
EISSN 1996-1073
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_e1eaf007bb3b4f0eae0828e833bfa4e0
10_3390_en13082119
GroupedDBID 29G
2WC
5GY
5VS
7XC
8FE
8FG
8FH
AADQD
AAHBH
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABJCF
ADBBV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFZYC
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ATCPS
BCNDV
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DU5
EBS
ESX
FRP
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
I-F
IAO
KQ8
L6V
L8X
M7S
MODMG
M~E
OK1
P2P
PATMY
PIMPY
PROAC
PYCSY
RIG
TR2
TUS
ABUWG
AZQEC
DWQXO
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a7211dce63667b86a809145200bfbce7cc06d0a6d2ec1ef6df39ce8b1459a5a83
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1996-1073
IngestDate Thu Jul 04 21:10:25 EDT 2024
Fri Sep 13 02:07:15 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 04:54:09 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c361t-a7211dce63667b86a809145200bfbce7cc06d0a6d2ec1ef6df39ce8b1459a5a83
ORCID 0000-0002-0833-8247
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/e1eaf007bb3b4f0eae0828e833bfa4e0
PQID 2395449150
PQPubID 2032402
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e1eaf007bb3b4f0eae0828e833bfa4e0
proquest_journals_2395449150
crossref_primary_10_3390_en13082119
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Basel
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Basel
PublicationTitle Energies (Basel)
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher MDPI AG
Publisher_xml – name: MDPI AG
References ref_50
Sovacool (ref_7) 2017; 47
Vuichard (ref_39) 2019; 158
ref_14
ref_57
(ref_42) 2008; 12
Firestone (ref_22) 2018; 20
Geels (ref_8) 2018; 40
ref_51
Rogge (ref_31) 2017; 33
Olabi (ref_18) 2016; 108
Feurtey (ref_37) 2016; 54
Szulecki (ref_56) 2018; 27
Lienhoop (ref_35) 2018; 118
Enevoldsen (ref_36) 2016; 53
ref_25
ref_24
ref_23
ref_21
Sonnberger (ref_28) 2017; 51
Sovacool (ref_17) 2012; 16
Aitken (ref_54) 2010; 38
Hill (ref_27) 2011; 39
Wuestenhagen (ref_11) 2007; 35
Zoellner (ref_15) 2008; 36
Fournis (ref_12) 2016; 60
McCauley (ref_16) 2013; 32
Krug (ref_49) 2020; 9
Burke (ref_30) 2017; 33
Upham (ref_10) 2015; 8
Liebe (ref_53) 2017; 107
Oteman (ref_48) 2014; 4
ref_33
Pasqualetti (ref_32) 2011; 101
Scholtens (ref_13) 2015; 43
Perlaviciute (ref_9) 2014; 35
Scherhaufer (ref_38) 2017; 109
Xueliang (ref_43) 2015; 92
Heffron (ref_19) 2015; 87
Forman (ref_20) 2017; 107
Wolsink (ref_34) 2007; 35
Bell (ref_29) 2005; 14
ref_47
ref_46
Toke (ref_55) 2005; 33
ref_45
ref_44
Yiridoe (ref_40) 2014; 74
ref_1
Gallagher (ref_26) 2012; 37
ref_3
ref_2
Felber (ref_52) 2014; 4
Hammami (ref_41) 2016; 54
ref_5
ref_4
ref_6
References_xml – ident: ref_5
– volume: 8
  start-page: 100
  year: 2015
  ident: ref_10
  article-title: Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy ecosystems
  publication-title: Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
  doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.003
  contributor:
    fullname: Upham
– volume: 101
  start-page: 907
  year: 2011
  ident: ref_32
  article-title: Opposing Wind energy Landscapes: A search for Common Causes
  publication-title: Annu. Assoc. Am. Geogr.
  doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.568879
  contributor:
    fullname: Pasqualetti
– ident: ref_51
– volume: 33
  start-page: 35
  year: 2017
  ident: ref_30
  article-title: Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transition
  publication-title: Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
  doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024
  contributor:
    fullname: Burke
– volume: 74
  start-page: 262
  year: 2014
  ident: ref_40
  article-title: Social acceptance of wind energy development and planning in rural community in Australia: A consumer analysis
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.035
  contributor:
    fullname: Yiridoe
– ident: ref_25
  doi: 10.1057/9780230286672
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1455
  year: 2016
  ident: ref_37
  article-title: Institutional factors influencing strategic decision making in energy policy: A case study of wind energy in France e and Quebec (Canada)
  publication-title: Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.082
  contributor:
    fullname: Feurtey
– volume: 158
  start-page: 101257
  year: 2019
  ident: ref_39
  article-title: Individual or collective? Community investments, local taxes, and social acceptance of wind energy in Switzerland
  publication-title: Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
  contributor:
    fullname: Vuichard
– volume: 40
  start-page: 23
  year: 2018
  ident: ref_8
  article-title: Reducing Energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transition perspective and thirteen research debate
  publication-title: Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
  doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.003
  contributor:
    fullname: Geels
– volume: 16
  start-page: 5268
  year: 2012
  ident: ref_17
  article-title: Conceptualizing the acceptance of wind and solar electricity
  publication-title: Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.048
  contributor:
    fullname: Sovacool
– ident: ref_1
– volume: 43
  start-page: 666
  year: 2015
  ident: ref_13
  article-title: Power to people: Local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy
  publication-title: Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.089
  contributor:
    fullname: Scholtens
– ident: ref_23
– volume: 107
  start-page: 649
  year: 2017
  ident: ref_20
  article-title: Energy justice at the end of the wire: Enacting community energy and equity in Wales
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.006
  contributor:
    fullname: Forman
– volume: 92
  start-page: 168
  year: 2015
  ident: ref_43
  article-title: Social acceptance of wind power. A case study of Shandong province, China
  publication-title: J. Clean. Prod.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.097
  contributor:
    fullname: Xueliang
– volume: 38
  start-page: 6066
  year: 2010
  ident: ref_54
  article-title: Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.062
  contributor:
    fullname: Aitken
– volume: 47
  start-page: 703
  year: 2017
  ident: ref_7
  article-title: Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change
  publication-title: Soc. Study Sci.
  doi: 10.1177/0306312717709363
  contributor:
    fullname: Sovacool
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2692
  year: 2007
  ident: ref_34
  article-title: Planning for renewable schemes. Deliberative and fair decision making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002
  contributor:
    fullname: Wolsink
– ident: ref_4
– volume: 35
  start-page: 361
  year: 2014
  ident: ref_9
  article-title: Contextual and physiological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated reviews and research agenda
  publication-title: Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.003
  contributor:
    fullname: Perlaviciute
– volume: 32
  start-page: 107
  year: 2013
  ident: ref_16
  article-title: Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets and systems thinking
  publication-title: Int. Energy Law Rev.
  contributor:
    fullname: McCauley
– volume: 51
  start-page: 56
  year: 2017
  ident: ref_28
  article-title: Local and socio-political acceptance of wind farms in Germany
  publication-title: Technol. Soc.
  doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.07.005
  contributor:
    fullname: Sonnberger
– volume: 4
  start-page: 22
  year: 2014
  ident: ref_52
  article-title: Onshore wind energy use in spatial planning—A proposal for resolving conflicts with a dynamic safety distance approach
  publication-title: Energy Sustain. Soc.
  doi: 10.1186/s13705-014-0022-8
  contributor:
    fullname: Felber
– ident: ref_45
– volume: 27
  start-page: 21
  year: 2018
  ident: ref_56
  article-title: Conceptualizing energy democracy
  publication-title: Environ. Politics
  doi: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294
  contributor:
    fullname: Szulecki
– ident: ref_24
  doi: 10.3390/su12051754
– volume: 109
  start-page: 863
  year: 2017
  ident: ref_38
  article-title: Patterns of acceptance and non-acceptance within energy landscape. A case study of wind energy expansion in Austria
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.057
  contributor:
    fullname: Scherhaufer
– volume: 37
  start-page: 137
  year: 2012
  ident: ref_26
  article-title: The energy technology innovation system
  publication-title: Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.
  doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-060311-133915
  contributor:
    fullname: Gallagher
– volume: 9
  start-page: 9
  year: 2020
  ident: ref_49
  article-title: Citizens at the heart of energy transition in Europe? Opportunities and Challenges for Wind Farms in six European Countries
  publication-title: Renew. Energy Law Policy Rev.
  doi: 10.4337/relp.2020.04.02
  contributor:
    fullname: Krug
– ident: ref_3
– volume: 107
  start-page: 300
  year: 2017
  ident: ref_53
  article-title: A turbine is not only a turbine: The role of social context and fairness characteristics for the local acceptance of wind power
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.043
  contributor:
    fullname: Liebe
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1527
  year: 2005
  ident: ref_55
  article-title: Explaining wind power planning outcomes: Some findings from a study in England and Wales
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  contributor:
    fullname: Toke
– ident: ref_47
– ident: ref_57
  doi: 10.1177/0013916515605562
– volume: 36
  start-page: 4136
  year: 2008
  ident: ref_15
  article-title: Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.026
  contributor:
    fullname: Zoellner
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2683
  year: 2007
  ident: ref_11
  article-title: Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation. An introduction to the context
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
  contributor:
    fullname: Wuestenhagen
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: ref_12
  article-title: From social “acceptance” to social “acceptability” of wind energy projects: Towards a territorial perspective
  publication-title: J. Environ. Plan. Manag.
  doi: 10.1080/09640568.2015.1133406
  contributor:
    fullname: Fournis
– volume: 20
  start-page: 370
  year: 2018
  ident: ref_22
  article-title: Reconsidering barriers to wind power projects: Community engagement, developer transparency and place
  publication-title: J. Environ. Policy Plan.
  doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1418656
  contributor:
    fullname: Firestone
– ident: ref_14
– volume: 14
  start-page: 460
  year: 2005
  ident: ref_29
  article-title: The “Social Gap” in wind farm citing decisions: Explanations and policy responses
  publication-title: Environ. Politics
  doi: 10.1080/09644010500175833
  contributor:
    fullname: Bell
– ident: ref_44
– ident: ref_21
– volume: 54
  start-page: 151
  year: 2016
  ident: ref_41
  article-title: Identifying the determinants of community acceptance of renewable energy technologies: The case study of a wind energy project from Tunisia
  publication-title: Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.037
  contributor:
    fullname: Hammami
– volume: 53
  start-page: 178
  year: 2016
  ident: ref_36
  article-title: Examining the social acceptance of wind energy: Practical guidelines for onshore wind project development in France
  publication-title: Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.041
  contributor:
    fullname: Enevoldsen
– volume: 4
  start-page: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: ref_48
  article-title: The institutional space for community initiatives for renewable energy: A comparative case study of the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark
  publication-title: Sustain. Soc.
  contributor:
    fullname: Oteman
– volume: 108
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: ref_18
  article-title: Energy quadrilemma and the future of renewable energy
  publication-title: Energy
  doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.145
  contributor:
    fullname: Olabi
– volume: 12
  start-page: 584
  year: 2008
  ident: ref_42
  article-title: Acceptance of renewable energy innovation in Brazil-case study of wind energy
  publication-title: Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.017
– ident: ref_6
– ident: ref_50
– ident: ref_33
– ident: ref_2
– ident: ref_46
– volume: 87
  start-page: 168
  year: 2015
  ident: ref_19
  article-title: Resolving society’s energy trilemma through the Energy Justice Metric
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.033
  contributor:
    fullname: Heffron
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1647
  year: 2011
  ident: ref_27
  article-title: Accounting for variation in wind deployment between Canadian provinces
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.040
  contributor:
    fullname: Hill
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: ref_31
  article-title: Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transition
  publication-title: Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
  doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.025
  contributor:
    fullname: Rogge
– volume: 118
  start-page: 97
  year: 2018
  ident: ref_35
  article-title: Wind power acceptance through financial and procedural participation? An investigation using focus groups and choice experiments
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.063
  contributor:
    fullname: Lienhoop
SSID ssj0000331333
Score 2.377786
Snippet The present article deals with two key drivers of social acceptance of wind energy: procedural justice and distributional justice. It is based on a comparative...
SourceID doaj
proquest
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
StartPage 2119
SubjectTerms Acceptance
Alternative energy sources
Community
Decision making
Energy industry
Energy policy
Industrial plant emissions
Literature reviews
participation
Public involvement
Public participation
Renewable resources
social acceptance
Turbines
wind energy
Wind farms
Wind power
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection
  dbid: 8FG
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV07T8MwELZKWWBAPEWhIEuwhjzsOMmECmqoEGJAVHSLbOfMgpLSpgP_Hl8ebSUkVsfKcA_7u_Pdd4TcWiPgFlZHTqJU6HAIrUuZIHZE7qlAxAZf0rDa4lVMpvx5Fs56ZNL1wmBZZXcm1gd1XmrMkbsBS0LOE4tfXKkwC6Ar937-7eD8KHxnbYdp7JBdHznxsGc8fVpnWzzGbDDGGn5SZuN8FwofmVp8pNjZupFq4v4_53J92aSH5KBFiXTUqPWI9KA4Jvtb3IEnRGH1XDPegabN0Bz60lTE06qkbeNH9UNHGitXULm0NPTDxuB0XDf83dE3WK6-qiWuy4LWrMcVHa25Ok_JNB2_P06cdmCCo5nwK0diOJdrEEyISMVCxhYNcCRWUkZpiLT2rA6kyAPQPhiRG5ZoiJXdk8hQxuyM9IuygHNCjb2mAi_08sDTXJjQwjwjNfcl-MCjQAzITSe0bN7wYmQ2nkDRZhvRDsgDynO9A7ms64Vy8Zm1rpHZP0pjoYpSTHHjgQSk1YOYMWUkB29Ahp02stbBltnGHC7-_3xJ9gIMketimyHpV4sVXFkcUanr2kR-Aa3qyDw
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Explaining Factors Leading to Community Acceptance of Wind Energy. Results of an Expert Assessment
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2395449150/abstract/
https://doaj.org/article/e1eaf007bb3b4f0eae0828e833bfa4e0
Volume 13
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3PS8MwFA46L3oQf-J0joBe69omTdvjJuuGyJDhcLeSpC8n6cR1B_97X5puFjx48dJDCLR8L8l7H_3yPULucRFwLKtjL1Uq8jhEuKVMmHii8FUoEmP_pFm1xUxMF_xpGS1brb6sJszZAzvgBhCANJjIlGKKGx8kWNM1SBhTRnJwbD2IWmSqPoMZQ_LFnB8pQ14_gDKwziyBtdRpZaDaqP_XOVwnl-yEHDdVIR26rzkle1CekaOWV-A5UVYt59o50Mw1yaHPTgFPqxVtLnpUX3SorVLFBpOuDH1Dzk3H9QW_BzqH9ea9WttxWdLa5biiw5035wVZZOPXx6nXNEjwNBNB5UlL3woNggkRq0TIBLM_t0ZKyigNsdY-Yi5FEYIOwIjCsFRDonBOKiOZsEvSKVclXBFqMC2FfuQXoa-5MBGWdUZqHkjEn8eh6JK7LWj5h_PByJE_WGjzH2i7ZGTx3M2w3tX1AEY0byKa_xXRLulto5E3G2qdhyyNOE-xfL3-j3fckMPQEudagtMjnepzA7dYXVSqT_aTbNInB6Px7GXer5cVPifL4BuzItHg
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,870,2115,12792,21416,27957,27958,33408,33779,43635,43840,74392,74659
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV09T8MwELX4GIAB8SkKBSzBGkhix00mVFBLgcKAqGCLbOfMgpLSpgP_nrskLUhIrI6V4e7se2c_v2PsHINAIqzueIkxkSchwiXlwthTmW9CFTu6SSO2xZMajOT9W_TWHLhNG1rlfE-sNuqssHRGfhmKJJIyQfxyNf70qGsU3a42LTSW2aoUmDrppXj_dnHG4guBJZioVUkFVveXkAekzxKQsM6vPFTJ9f_ZjasU099imw025N3amdtsCfIdtvFLMXCXGeLM1U0deL9ulcOHNQ-elwVvnnuUX7xria9CLuWF469YefNe9czvgj_DdPZRTmlc57zSOi55d6HQucdG_d7LzcBr2iR4Vqig9DQVcZkFJZTqmFjpGDGAJDkl44yFjrU-Wl6rLAQbgFOZE4mF2OCcREc6FvtsJS9yOGDcYXIK_cjPQt9K5SIEd05bGWgIQHZC1WJnc6Ol41oNI8Uqgkyb_pi2xa7JnosZpGBdDRST97RZECn-UTsEKMYII50PGkhMD2IhjNMS_BZrz72RNstqmv4EweH_n0_Z2uDlcZgO754ejth6SEVyRbdps5VyMoNjRBKlOanC5Rtwr8dq
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1JS8QwFA4uIHoQVxzXgF7rtE2aaU8yLnVFRBS9lSR98SKtOvXgv_e9NjMKgtc09PCW5HvJl-8xdoBBIBFWD4LMmCSQkGBKuTgNVBmaWKWObtKIbXGrLh7l1XPy7PlPI0-rHK-J7UJd1pbOyPuxyBIpM8QvfedpEXen-dHbe0AdpOim1bfTmGazBLKpm0Gan0_OW0IhsBwTnUKpwEq_D1VEWi0Riez82pNa6f4_K3O73eRLbNHjRD7sHLvMpqBaYQu_1ANXmSH-XNfggedd2xx-03HieVNz__Sj-eJDS9wVci-vHX_CKpyftU_-Dvk9jD5fmxGN64q3uscNH07UOtfYY372cHIR-JYJgRUqagJNBV1pQQmlBiZVOkU8IElayThjYWBtiF7QqozBRuBU6URmITU4J9OJTsU6m6nqCjYYd7hRxWESlnFopXIJAj2nrYw0RCAHseqx_bHRirdOGaPAioJMW_yYtseOyZ6TGaRm3Q7UHy-FT44C_6gdghVjhJEuBA0krAepEMZpCWGPbY-9UfgUGxU_AbH5_-c9NoeRUtxc3l5vsfmY6uWWebPNZpqPT9hBUNGY3TZavgGNb8uf
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining+Factors+Leading+to+Community+Acceptance+of+Wind+Energy.+Results+of+an+Expert+Assessment&rft.jtitle=Energies+%28Basel%29&rft.au=Elena+De+Luca&rft.au=Cecilia+Nardi&rft.au=Laura+Gaetana+Giuffrida&rft.au=Michael+Krug&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.pub=MDPI+AG&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2119&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390%2Fen13082119&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_e1eaf007bb3b4f0eae0828e833bfa4e0
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1996-1073&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1996-1073&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1996-1073&client=summon