NMR investigations of protein–carbohydrate interactions: insights into the topology of the bound conformation of a lactose isomer and β-galactosyl xyloses to mistletoe lectin and galectin-1
A hallmark of oligosaccharides is their often limited spatial flexibility, allowing them to access a distinct set of conformers in solution. Viewing each individual or even the complete ensemble of conformations as potential binding partner(s) for lectins in protein–carbohydrate interactions, it is...
Saved in:
Published in | Biochimica et biophysica acta Vol. 1568; no. 3; pp. 225 - 236 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
19.12.2001
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A hallmark of oligosaccharides is their often limited spatial flexibility, allowing them to access a distinct set of conformers in solution. Viewing each individual or even the complete ensemble of conformations as potential binding partner(s) for lectins in protein–carbohydrate interactions, it is pertinent to address the question on the characteristics of bound state conformation(s) in solution. Also, it is possible that entering the lectin’s binding site distorts the low-energy topology of a glycosidic linkage. As a step to delineate the strategy of ligand selection for galactosides, a common physiological docking point, we have performed a NMR study on two non-homologous lectins showing identical monosaccharide specificity. Thus, the conformation of lactose analogues bound to bovine heart galectin-1 and to mistletoe lectin in solution has been determined by transferred nuclear Overhauser effect measurements. It is demonstrated that the lectins select the
syn conformation of lactose and various structural analogues (Galβ(1→4)Xyl, Galβ(1→3)Xyl, Galβ(1→2)Xyl, and Galβ(1→3)Glc) from the ensemble of presented conformations. No evidence for conformational distortion was obtained. Docking of the analogues to the modeled binding sites furnishes explanations, in structural terms, for exclusive recognition of the
syn conformer despite the non-homologous design of the binding sites. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-4165 0006-3002 1872-8006 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0304-4165(01)00224-0 |