Comparison of length limits and the actual length of abstracts in pharmacology, oncology, and neurology journals listed in PubMed

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of pharmacology, oncology, and neurology. Specifically, the following parameters were examined: abstract formats among the three subject areas; t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScience editing Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 39 - 46
Main Authors Kim, Eungi, Lee, Yong-Gu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korean Council of Science Editors 01.02.2021
한국과학학술지편집인협의회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2288-8063
2288-7474
DOI10.6087/kcse.228

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose: This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of pharmacology, oncology, and neurology. Specifically, the following parameters were examined: abstract formats among the three subject areas; the relationship between the length limit and the actual length of abstracts; and actual abstract length according to the number of subheadings, the length of structured abstract subheadings, the length of frequently used subheading sets, and clinical trial registration information.Methods: Thirty journals from each of three medical fields (pharmacology, oncology, and neurology) were selected from Elsevier’s Scimago Journal Rank. This included the journals indexed in PubMed from 2018 to 2019 that published the most articles. Article abstracts from these journals were used to create a dataset for this study. Descriptive, comparative, and correlational analyses of data for the three fields were conducted.Results: The number of subheadings and abstract length increased in parallel. The Results component was the longest, suggesting that authors tended to use longer text to report results than for other structural abstract components. Authors generally utilized the length limit to a full extent without exceeding it.Conclusion: The traditionally used 250-word length limit should be reconsidered for pharmacology, oncology, and neurology journals because it disregards the distinctive characteristics of abstracts and length differences between structured and unstructured abstracts. Various characteristics of abstract lengths presented in this study should be considered to establish more justifiable policies.
AbstractList Purpose This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of pharmacology, oncology, and neurology. Specifically, the following parameters were examined: abstract formats among the three subject areas; the relationship between the length limit and the actual length of abstracts; and actual abstract length according to the number of subheadings, the length of structured abstract subheadings, the length of frequently used subheading sets, and clinical trial registration information. Methods Thirty journals from each of three medical fields (pharmacology, oncology, and neurology) were selected from Elsevier’s Scimago Journal Rank. This included the journals indexed in PubMed from 2018 to 2019 that published the most articles. Article abstracts from these journals were used to create a dataset for this study. Descriptive, comparative, and correlational analyses of data for the three fields were conducted. Results The number of subheadings and abstract length increased in parallel. The Results component was the longest, suggesting that authors tended to use longer text to report results than for other structural abstract components. Authors generally utilized the length limit to a full extent without exceeding it. Conclusion The traditionally used 250-word length limit should be reconsidered for pharmacology, oncology, and neurology journals because it disregards the distinctive characteristics of abstracts and length differences between structured and unstructured abstracts. Various characteristics of abstract lengths presented in this study should be considered to establish more justifiable policies.
Purpose This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of pharmacology, oncology, and neurology. Specifically, the following parameters were examined: abstract formats among the three subject areas; the relationship between the length limit and the actual length of abstracts; and actual abstract length according to the number of subheadings, the length of structured abstract subheadings, the length of frequently used subheading sets, and clinical trial registration information. Methods Thirty journals from each of three medical fields (pharmacology, oncology, and neurology) were selected from Elsevier’s Scimago Journal Rank. This included the journals indexed in PubMed from 2018 to 2019 that published the most articles. Article abstracts from these journals were used to create a dataset for this study. Descriptive, comparative, and correlational analyses of data for the three fields were conducted. Results The number of subheadings and abstract length increased in parallel. The Results component was the longest, suggesting that authors tended to use longer text to report results than for other structural abstract components. Authors generally utilized the length limit to a full extent without exceeding it. Conclusion The traditionally used 250-word length limit should be reconsidered for pharmacology, oncology, and neurology journals because it disregards the distinctive characteristics of abstracts and length differences between structured and unstructured abstracts. Various characteristics of abstract lengths presented in this study should be considered to establish more justifiable policies. KCI Citation Count: 0
Author Lee, Yong-Gu
Kim, Eungi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Eungi
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7314-1726
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Eungi
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yong-Gu
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0192-8711
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Yong-Gu
BackLink https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002705226$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNplUU1PAyEQJUYTv5r4EzhqYiu77AJ7NI0fTTQao2cyy0JLu4UG6MGj_1zaWg96mRnevPcy4Z2iQ-edRuiiICNGBL9ZqKhHZSkO0EmuYsgrXh3-zIIweowGMc4JIQVjTc3YCfoa--UKgo3eYW9wr900zXBvlzZFDK7DaaYxqLSGfr_MNGhjChmN2Dq8mkFYgvK9n35eY-_200bt9Dpsn3ju18FBH7N3TLrbCF_X7bPuztGRybge_PQz9HF_9z5-HD69PEzGt09DRVmRhg2nnS4IKw3rWA2kBANdVdG2yGjFQYGuoKGqoZwwITjjbVWzFjpBlCh0S8_Q1c7XBSMXykoPdtunXi6CvH17n8iG81LUPHMnO27nYS5XwS4hfG4FW8CHqYSQrOq1ZK0pjMhnKVNWiipB8gXasIazWgPQ7HW581LBxxi0-fUriNykJjepyZxRpo7-UJVNkKx3-bdt_1_wDfQwng8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_01655515221107335
Cites_doi 10.1108/JDOC-09-2015-0111
10.1117/JBO.24.10.100101
10.1007/s11606-018-4428-4
10.1108/NLW-09-2013-0069
10.5812/ijem.100159
10.1007/s11606-017-4196-6
10.1145/2536536.2536596
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
ACYCR
DOI 10.6087/kcse.228
DatabaseName CrossRef
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList

CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
EISSN 2288-7474
EndPage 46
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9772857
oai_doaj_org_article_6bf1f862fcf24c3c80937ef69765eaa3
10_6087_kcse_228
GroupedDBID 5VS
AAYXX
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
CITATION
GROUPED_DOAJ
KQ8
M~E
ACYCR
IPNFZ
RIG
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-973de1062f6d65a02afad443b1e1047acae4a93c9370688767b456bad80c81eb3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2288-8063
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:26:15 EST 2023
Wed Aug 27 01:31:47 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:23:42 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:12:07 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c361t-973de1062f6d65a02afad443b1e1047acae4a93c9370688767b456bad80c81eb3
Notes https://www.escienceediting.org/journal/view.php?number=234
ORCID 0000-0001-7314-1726
0000-0002-0192-8711
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/6bf1f862fcf24c3c80937ef69765eaa3
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9772857
doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6bf1f862fcf24c3c80937ef69765eaa3
crossref_primary_10_6087_kcse_228
crossref_citationtrail_10_6087_kcse_228
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-2-1
2021-02-01
2021-02
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-2-1
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Science editing
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Korean Council of Science Editors
한국과학학술지편집인협의회
Publisher_xml – name: Korean Council of Science Editors
– name: 한국과학학술지편집인협의회
References ref8
ref7
ref9
ref6
ref5
ref2
ref1
Sollaci (ref3) 2004
Kim (ref4) 2018
References_xml – start-page: 364
  volume-title: The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey
  year: 2004
  ident: ref3
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1108/JDOC-09-2015-0111
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1117/JBO.24.10.100101
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4428-4
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1108/NLW-09-2013-0069
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.5812/ijem.100159
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4196-6
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1145/2536536.2536596
– start-page: 46
  volume-title: The lengths of LIS journal abstracts: a comparison of structured abstracts and traditional abstracts
  year: 2018
  ident: ref4
SSID ssj0001669566
Score 2.1419086
Snippet Purpose: This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of...
Purpose This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of...
Purpose This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of...
SourceID nrf
doaj
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 39
SubjectTerms bibliometrics
pubmed
문헌정보학
Title Comparison of length limits and the actual length of abstracts in pharmacology, oncology, and neurology journals listed in PubMed
URI https://doaj.org/article/6bf1f862fcf24c3c80937ef69765eaa3
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002705226
Volume 8
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Science Editing, 2021, 8(1), , pp.39-46
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA7iSQ_iE9cXUQQvVnfTJq1HFUUFxYOCtzCZJiouXdldDx79586k3bUHwYunviZpmQz9ZkLyfULsp4S5QaFLQqYw4ZSB_oM-JJCWiB4LrSJvwe2duXrMbp70U0vqi9eE1fTAteOOjQu9QGl3wKAyTLGgEjz3wRCMag8QeT4J81rFVJxdMYYS_6gspygUCgLimnnWdIv8-A1H_kixAHsLiyJlPyFMNQwthLlcFAtNaihP609aEjO-WhbzLcLAFfF1PpUNlIMgWQVl_CL7vElpJKEqJaVzEuKekMlDMgPH8xlIJq-VfP_hqv48lINqcsatI7klX8omxEbUN8-HcsP7D3fry1XxeHnxcH6VNCIKCaamN05O8rT0VPepYEqjoasgQJllqet5ZmkABJ_BSYrkVdafyU3uaMQclEUXix6V2mtithpUfl3IDAG8VkjNMCvAQZd61BoI0UCHNO-Ig4k7LTYM4yx00bdUabDjLTvekuM7Yndq-V6zavxic8YjMn3OPNjxBkWHbaLD_hUdHbFH40l9vsb2fHwe2LehpWrh2lLuqwqdb_zHmzbFnOLlLnFB95aYHQ8__DblK2O3E0PzG1Os6wo
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+length+limits+and+the+actual+length+of+abstracts+in+pharmacology%2C+oncology%2C+and+neurology+journals+listed+in+PubMed&rft.jtitle=Science+editing&rft.au=Eungi+Kim&rft.au=Yong-Gu+Lee&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.pub=Korean+Council+of+Science+Editors&rft.issn=2288-8063&rft.eissn=2288-7474&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=46&rft_id=info:doi/10.6087%2Fkcse.228&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_6bf1f862fcf24c3c80937ef69765eaa3
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2288-8063&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2288-8063&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2288-8063&client=summon