Comparison of length limits and the actual length of abstracts in pharmacology, oncology, and neurology journals listed in PubMed
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of pharmacology, oncology, and neurology. Specifically, the following parameters were examined: abstract formats among the three subject areas; t...
Saved in:
Published in | Science editing Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 39 - 46 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korean Council of Science Editors
01.02.2021
한국과학학술지편집인협의회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2288-8063 2288-7474 |
DOI | 10.6087/kcse.228 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose: This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of pharmacology, oncology, and neurology. Specifically, the following parameters were examined: abstract formats among the three subject areas; the relationship between the length limit and the actual length of abstracts; and actual abstract length according to the number of subheadings, the length of structured abstract subheadings, the length of frequently used subheading sets, and clinical trial registration information.Methods: Thirty journals from each of three medical fields (pharmacology, oncology, and neurology) were selected from Elsevier’s Scimago Journal Rank. This included the journals indexed in PubMed from 2018 to 2019 that published the most articles. Article abstracts from these journals were used to create a dataset for this study. Descriptive, comparative, and correlational analyses of data for the three fields were conducted.Results: The number of subheadings and abstract length increased in parallel. The Results component was the longest, suggesting that authors tended to use longer text to report results than for other structural abstract components. Authors generally utilized the length limit to a full extent without exceeding it.Conclusion: The traditionally used 250-word length limit should be reconsidered for pharmacology, oncology, and neurology journals because it disregards the distinctive characteristics of abstracts and length differences between structured and unstructured abstracts. Various characteristics of abstract lengths presented in this study should be considered to establish more justifiable policies. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of pharmacology, oncology, and neurology. Specifically, the following parameters were examined: abstract formats among the three subject areas; the relationship between the length limit and the actual length of abstracts; and actual abstract length according to the number of subheadings, the length of structured abstract subheadings, the length of frequently used subheading sets, and clinical trial registration information. Methods Thirty journals from each of three medical fields (pharmacology, oncology, and neurology) were selected from Elsevier’s Scimago Journal Rank. This included the journals indexed in PubMed from 2018 to 2019 that published the most articles. Article abstracts from these journals were used to create a dataset for this study. Descriptive, comparative, and correlational analyses of data for the three fields were conducted. Results The number of subheadings and abstract length increased in parallel. The Results component was the longest, suggesting that authors tended to use longer text to report results than for other structural abstract components. Authors generally utilized the length limit to a full extent without exceeding it. Conclusion The traditionally used 250-word length limit should be reconsidered for pharmacology, oncology, and neurology journals because it disregards the distinctive characteristics of abstracts and length differences between structured and unstructured abstracts. Various characteristics of abstract lengths presented in this study should be considered to establish more justifiable policies. Purpose This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of pharmacology, oncology, and neurology. Specifically, the following parameters were examined: abstract formats among the three subject areas; the relationship between the length limit and the actual length of abstracts; and actual abstract length according to the number of subheadings, the length of structured abstract subheadings, the length of frequently used subheading sets, and clinical trial registration information. Methods Thirty journals from each of three medical fields (pharmacology, oncology, and neurology) were selected from Elsevier’s Scimago Journal Rank. This included the journals indexed in PubMed from 2018 to 2019 that published the most articles. Article abstracts from these journals were used to create a dataset for this study. Descriptive, comparative, and correlational analyses of data for the three fields were conducted. Results The number of subheadings and abstract length increased in parallel. The Results component was the longest, suggesting that authors tended to use longer text to report results than for other structural abstract components. Authors generally utilized the length limit to a full extent without exceeding it. Conclusion The traditionally used 250-word length limit should be reconsidered for pharmacology, oncology, and neurology journals because it disregards the distinctive characteristics of abstracts and length differences between structured and unstructured abstracts. Various characteristics of abstract lengths presented in this study should be considered to establish more justifiable policies. KCI Citation Count: 0 |
Author | Lee, Yong-Gu Kim, Eungi |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Eungi orcidid: 0000-0001-7314-1726 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Eungi – sequence: 2 givenname: Yong-Gu orcidid: 0000-0002-0192-8711 surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Yong-Gu |
BackLink | https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002705226$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNplUU1PAyEQJUYTv5r4EzhqYiu77AJ7NI0fTTQao2cyy0JLu4UG6MGj_1zaWg96mRnevPcy4Z2iQ-edRuiiICNGBL9ZqKhHZSkO0EmuYsgrXh3-zIIweowGMc4JIQVjTc3YCfoa--UKgo3eYW9wr900zXBvlzZFDK7DaaYxqLSGfr_MNGhjChmN2Dq8mkFYgvK9n35eY-_200bt9Dpsn3ju18FBH7N3TLrbCF_X7bPuztGRybge_PQz9HF_9z5-HD69PEzGt09DRVmRhg2nnS4IKw3rWA2kBANdVdG2yGjFQYGuoKGqoZwwITjjbVWzFjpBlCh0S8_Q1c7XBSMXykoPdtunXi6CvH17n8iG81LUPHMnO27nYS5XwS4hfG4FW8CHqYSQrOq1ZK0pjMhnKVNWiipB8gXasIazWgPQ7HW581LBxxi0-fUriNykJjepyZxRpo7-UJVNkKx3-bdt_1_wDfQwng8 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_01655515221107335 |
Cites_doi | 10.1108/JDOC-09-2015-0111 10.1117/JBO.24.10.100101 10.1007/s11606-018-4428-4 10.1108/NLW-09-2013-0069 10.5812/ijem.100159 10.1007/s11606-017-4196-6 10.1145/2536536.2536596 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA ACYCR |
DOI | 10.6087/kcse.228 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering |
EISSN | 2288-7474 |
EndPage | 46 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9772857 oai_doaj_org_article_6bf1f862fcf24c3c80937ef69765eaa3 10_6087_kcse_228 |
GroupedDBID | 5VS AAYXX ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BCNDV CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ KQ8 M~E ACYCR IPNFZ RIG |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-973de1062f6d65a02afad443b1e1047acae4a93c9370688767b456bad80c81eb3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2288-8063 |
IngestDate | Tue Nov 21 21:26:15 EST 2023 Wed Aug 27 01:31:47 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:23:42 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:07 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c361t-973de1062f6d65a02afad443b1e1047acae4a93c9370688767b456bad80c81eb3 |
Notes | https://www.escienceediting.org/journal/view.php?number=234 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-7314-1726 0000-0002-0192-8711 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/6bf1f862fcf24c3c80937ef69765eaa3 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9772857 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6bf1f862fcf24c3c80937ef69765eaa3 crossref_primary_10_6087_kcse_228 crossref_citationtrail_10_6087_kcse_228 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-2-1 2021-02-01 2021-02 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2021 text: 2021-2-1 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Science editing |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Korean Council of Science Editors 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Korean Council of Science Editors – name: 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 |
References | ref8 ref7 ref9 ref6 ref5 ref2 ref1 Sollaci (ref3) 2004 Kim (ref4) 2018 |
References_xml | – start-page: 364 volume-title: The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey year: 2004 ident: ref3 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1108/JDOC-09-2015-0111 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1117/JBO.24.10.100101 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4428-4 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1108/NLW-09-2013-0069 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.5812/ijem.100159 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4196-6 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1145/2536536.2536596 – start-page: 46 volume-title: The lengths of LIS journal abstracts: a comparison of structured abstracts and traditional abstracts year: 2018 ident: ref4 |
SSID | ssj0001669566 |
Score | 2.1419086 |
Snippet | Purpose: This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of... Purpose This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of... Purpose This study aimed to compare the length limits specified in the author guidelines with the actual length of abstracts in 90 journals in the fields of... |
SourceID | nrf doaj crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 39 |
SubjectTerms | bibliometrics pubmed 문헌정보학 |
Title | Comparison of length limits and the actual length of abstracts in pharmacology, oncology, and neurology journals listed in PubMed |
URI | https://doaj.org/article/6bf1f862fcf24c3c80937ef69765eaa3 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002705226 |
Volume | 8 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Science Editing, 2021, 8(1), , pp.39-46 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA7iSQ_iE9cXUQQvVnfTJq1HFUUFxYOCtzCZJiouXdldDx79586k3bUHwYunviZpmQz9ZkLyfULsp4S5QaFLQqYw4ZSB_oM-JJCWiB4LrSJvwe2duXrMbp70U0vqi9eE1fTAteOOjQu9QGl3wKAyTLGgEjz3wRCMag8QeT4J81rFVJxdMYYS_6gspygUCgLimnnWdIv8-A1H_kixAHsLiyJlPyFMNQwthLlcFAtNaihP609aEjO-WhbzLcLAFfF1PpUNlIMgWQVl_CL7vElpJKEqJaVzEuKekMlDMgPH8xlIJq-VfP_hqv48lINqcsatI7klX8omxEbUN8-HcsP7D3fry1XxeHnxcH6VNCIKCaamN05O8rT0VPepYEqjoasgQJllqet5ZmkABJ_BSYrkVdafyU3uaMQclEUXix6V2mtithpUfl3IDAG8VkjNMCvAQZd61BoI0UCHNO-Ig4k7LTYM4yx00bdUabDjLTvekuM7Yndq-V6zavxic8YjMn3OPNjxBkWHbaLD_hUdHbFH40l9vsb2fHwe2LehpWrh2lLuqwqdb_zHmzbFnOLlLnFB95aYHQ8__DblK2O3E0PzG1Os6wo |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+length+limits+and+the+actual+length+of+abstracts+in+pharmacology%2C+oncology%2C+and+neurology+journals+listed+in+PubMed&rft.jtitle=Science+editing&rft.au=Eungi+Kim&rft.au=Yong-Gu+Lee&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.pub=Korean+Council+of+Science+Editors&rft.issn=2288-8063&rft.eissn=2288-7474&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=46&rft_id=info:doi/10.6087%2Fkcse.228&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_6bf1f862fcf24c3c80937ef69765eaa3 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2288-8063&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2288-8063&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2288-8063&client=summon |