Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Estimating the Soil Salinity of Salt-Affected Soil Using Field Spectral Data

• Published in: Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 11; no. 22; p. 2605
• Main Authors: Wang, Sijia, Chen, Yunhao, Wang, Mingguo, Li, Jing
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.11.2019
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Collinearity; Data collection; Dryland farming; Estimation; gbrt; Global positioning systems; GPS; hyperspectral; lars; Learning algorithms; Machine learning; mlpr; Model accuracy; Multilayer perceptrons; Noise; Principal components analysis; Regression analysis; Remote sensing; rfr; Root-mean-square errors; Salinity; Salinity effects; Salinization; Salt; Salts; Soil salinity; soil salt content; Soils; Spectra; Stability analysis; Support vector machines; svr; China; Yellow River
• ISSN: 2072-4292; 2072-4292
• DOI: 10.3390/rs11222605

Salt-affected soil is a prominent ecological and environmental problem in dry farming areas throughout the world. China has nearly 9.9 million km 2 of salt-affected land. The identification, monitoring, and utilization of soil salinization have become important research topics for promoting sustainable progress. In this paper, using field-measured spectral data and soil salinity parameter data, through analysis and transformation of spectral data, five machine learning models, namely, random forest regression (RFR), support vector regression (SVR), gradient-boosted regression tree (GBRT), multilayer perceptron regression (MLPR), and least angle regression (Lars) are compared. The following performance measures of each model were evaluated: the collinear problems, handling data noise, stability, and the accuracy. In terms of these four aspects, the performance of each model on estimating soil salinity is evaluated. The results demonstrate that among the five models, RFR has the best performance in dealing with collinearity, RFR and MLPR have the best performance in dealing with data noise, and the SVR model is the most stable. The Lars model has the highest accuracy, with a determination coefficient ( R 2 ) of 0.87, ratio of performance to deviation (RPD) of 2.67, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.18, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.11. Then, the comprehensive comparison and analysis of the five models are carried out, and it is found that the comprehensive performance of RFR model is the best; hence, this method is most suitable for estimating soil salinity using hyperspectral data. This study can provide a reference for the selection of regression methods in subsequent studies on estimating soil salinity using hyperspectral data.