Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative

Examined in this study is the relationship between student perceptions in blended learning courses and their in-course achievement. The research was conducted at a large urban university that embarked on a major initiative to scale-up blended learning across its campus. Student perceptions (N=577) w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Internet and higher education Vol. 18; pp. 38 - 46
Main Authors Owston, Ron, York, Dennis, Murtha, Susan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.07.2013
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1096-7516
1873-5525
DOI10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Examined in this study is the relationship between student perceptions in blended learning courses and their in-course achievement. The research was conducted at a large urban university that embarked on a major initiative to scale-up blended learning across its campus. Student perceptions (N=577) were assessed in four areas deemed important to the university: overall satisfaction with blended learning, convenience afforded by blended learning, sense of engagement in their blended course, and views on learning outcomes. Final course grade was the dependent variable and cumulative grade point average was the covariate in an ANCOVA design. A remarkably strong relationship was found between perceptions and grades. Compared with low achieving students, high achievers were the most satisfied with their blended course, would take one again, and preferred the blended format more over fully face-to-face or online. High achievers also found blended courses more convenient, more engaging, and they felt that they learn key course concepts better than in other traditional face-to-face courses they have taken. An implication of the study is that low achievers may not be able to cope with the blended environment as well their high achieving peers. Therefore, when scaling up blended learning institutions may want to consider offering students a choice of whether to enroll in blended or fully face-to-face course sections where feasible, especially in subject areas that students find difficult. ► Student perceptions of blended learning and achievement examined. ► Setting was a large urban university embarking on a major blended initiative. ► High achieverspreferred the blended format over fully face-to-face or online. ► Low achievers may have difficulty coping with the blended environment.
AbstractList Examined in this study is the relationship between student perceptions in blended learning courses and their in-course achievement. The research was conducted at a large urban university that embarked on a major initiative to scale-up blended learning across its campus. Student perceptions (N = 577) were assessed in four areas deemed important to the university: overall satisfaction with blended learning, convenience afforded by blended learning, sense of engagement in their blended course, and views on learning outcomes. Final course grade was the dependent variable and cumulative grade point average was the covariate in an ANCOVA design. A remarkably strong relationship was found between perceptions and grades. Compared with low achieving students, high achievers were the most satisfied with their blended course, would take one again, and preferred the blended format more over fully face-to-face or online. High achievers also found blended courses more convenient, more engaging, and they felt that they learn key course concepts better than in other traditional face-to-face courses they have taken. An implication of the study is that low achievers may not be able to cope with the blended environment as well their high achieving peers. Therefore, when scaling up blended learning institutions may want to consider offering students a choice of whether to enroll in blended or fully face-to-face course sections where feasible, especially in subject areas that students find difficult. [Copyright Elsevier B.V.]
Examined in this study is the relationship between student perceptions in blended learning courses and their in-course achievement. The research was conducted at a large urban university that embarked on a major initiative to scale-up blended learning across its campus. Student perceptions (N=577) were assessed in four areas deemed important to the university: overall satisfaction with blended learning, convenience afforded by blended learning, sense of engagement in their blended course, and views on learning outcomes. Final course grade was the dependent variable and cumulative grade point average was the covariate in an ANCOVA design. A remarkably strong relationship was found between perceptions and grades. Compared with low achieving students, high achievers were the most satisfied with their blended course, would take one again, and preferred the blended format more over fully face-to-face or online. High achievers also found blended courses more convenient, more engaging, and they felt that they learn key course concepts better than in other traditional face-to-face courses they have taken. An implication of the study is that low achievers may not be able to cope with the blended environment as well their high achieving peers. Therefore, when scaling up blended learning institutions may want to consider offering students a choice of whether to enroll in blended or fully face-to-face course sections where feasible, especially in subject areas that students find difficult. ► Student perceptions of blended learning and achievement examined. ► Setting was a large urban university embarking on a major blended initiative. ► High achieverspreferred the blended format over fully face-to-face or online. ► Low achievers may have difficulty coping with the blended environment.
Examined in this study is the relationship between student perceptions in blended learning courses and their in-course achievement. The research was conducted at a large urban university that embarked on a major initiative to scale-up blended learning across its campus. Student perceptions (N = 577) were assessed in four areas deemed important to the university: overall satisfaction with blended learning, convenience afforded by blended learning, sense of engagement in their blended course, and views on learning outcomes. Final course grade was the dependent variable and cumulative grade point average was the covariate in an ANCOVA design. A remarkably strong relationship was found between perceptions and grades. Compared with low achieving students, high achievers were the most satisfied with their blended course, would take one again, and preferred the blended format more over fully face-to-face or online. High achievers also found blended courses more convenient, more engaging, and they felt that they learn key course concepts better than in other traditional face-to-face courses they have taken. An implication of the study is that low achievers may not be able to cope with the blended environment as well their high achieving peers. Therefore, when scaling up blended learning institutions may want to consider offering students a choice of whether to enroll in blended or fully face-to-face course sections where feasible, especially in subject areas that students find difficult. (Contains 3 tables.)
Audience Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Author Owston, Ron
York, Dennis
Murtha, Susan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ron
  surname: Owston
  fullname: Owston, Ron
  email: rowston@edu.yorku.ca
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Dennis
  surname: York
  fullname: York, Dennis
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Susan
  surname: Murtha
  fullname: Murtha, Susan
BackLink http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1007158$$DView record in ERIC
BookMark eNqFkMtKLDEQhoMoeH0DhV666THpS9J9FsJBvCK4UBeuQrpSrTX0pOck6QHf3owjLs5CoaAK_gvFt8-23eiQsWPBZ4ILeTaf0RvaCWYFF8UsDeflFtsTjSrzui7q7XTzVuaqFnKX7Ycw55zLpi732MtjnCy6mC3RAy4jjS5kxtnMwBvhChdrjVxmssnRCn2g-J51AzqLNhvQeEfuNQvRm4ivBMlKkUxM1kO205sh4NHXPmDPV5dPFzf5_cP17cXf-xxKKWKuoLWF7CQvGtWVskNRVoAGOlSVUn3fmrZupWoL1XCuQBRQ1U1juLEVYm9NecBON71LP_6bMES9oAA4DMbhOAUtKqHqqkmpZD3ZWNET6KWnhfHv-vJOpGbxqVcbHfwYgsf-2yO4XpPWc70hrdekdZpEOsX-_BcDimaNMmGh4bfw-ddPidGK0OsAhA7QkkeI2o70c8EH71yewQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_24289_ijsser_1466943
crossref_primary_10_3390_su15108150
crossref_primary_10_1080_02680513_2021_1973399
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_023_11894_3
crossref_primary_10_1080_00219266_2021_1884586
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_024_13014_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2018_02_009
crossref_primary_10_4195_nse2017_05_0008
crossref_primary_10_1080_13691457_2021_1954890
crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2021_1946566
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jevs_2023_104537
crossref_primary_10_1002_tl_20458
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2021_100454
crossref_primary_10_1080_07294360_2018_1517732
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2022_100694
crossref_primary_10_1080_02680513_2017_1414587
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40299_020_00531_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2017_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12270
crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_731720
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2017_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2022_100735
crossref_primary_10_1080_02680513_2020_1755642
crossref_primary_10_1080_03098265_2019_1600139
crossref_primary_10_1177_0735633117689892
crossref_primary_10_1108_ITSE_07_2018_0046
crossref_primary_10_30935_cedtech_6185
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2015_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1080_13562517_2022_2162816
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_021_02639_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2023_104809
crossref_primary_10_1109_RITA_2023_3250583
crossref_primary_10_1080_17512786_2022_2043767
crossref_primary_10_21432_cjlt27917
crossref_primary_10_4102_sajp_v77i1_1544
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0283513
crossref_primary_10_17718_tojde_973869
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0958344015000166
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_017_1009_x
crossref_primary_10_30935_cedtech_12398
crossref_primary_10_1057_s41307_024_00359_y
crossref_primary_10_1080_03075079_2022_2153246
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2021_100569
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjet_13475
crossref_primary_10_1177_21582440221093035
crossref_primary_10_18178_ijiet_2021_11_11_1563
crossref_primary_10_1080_20004508_2024_2361979
crossref_primary_10_3390_su13137074
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_022_11291_2
crossref_primary_10_1080_08838151_2015_1093481
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_12645
crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci11080446
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sbspro_2015_11_107
crossref_primary_10_4000_dms_1012
crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2023_1222962
crossref_primary_10_4018_IJMBL_2019010103
crossref_primary_10_4236_ce_2020_112008
crossref_primary_10_1515_ijhp_2017_0025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_edurev_2017_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1080_18146627_2016_1241672
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2016_07_006
crossref_primary_10_1080_10899995_2021_1965419
crossref_primary_10_4018_IJMBL_291978
crossref_primary_10_54097_ijeh_v5i3_2799
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_022_11224_z
crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2022_2121727
crossref_primary_10_1080_02763877_2019_1618780
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42330_021_00139_5
crossref_primary_10_1080_02103702_2023_2170109
crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci10090242
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_021_10544_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aei_2021_101436
crossref_primary_10_1109_TE_2019_2918097
crossref_primary_10_1080_0144929X_2019_1623323
crossref_primary_10_1080_01587919_2022_2064825
crossref_primary_10_1080_09639284_2016_1274913
crossref_primary_10_1080_00131946_2021_1969932
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2018_06_026
crossref_primary_10_1051_shsconf_202214901004
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18158162
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2017_01_003
crossref_primary_10_1108_ITP_01_2016_0024
crossref_primary_10_1080_22041451_2020_1824264
crossref_primary_10_1080_0144929X_2017_1417481
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42452_023_05278_y
crossref_primary_10_1108_INTR_04_2019_0155
crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2024_2442763
crossref_primary_10_1088_1742_6596_978_1_012006
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2022_880835
crossref_primary_10_3923_jas_2013_736_742
crossref_primary_10_29333_ejmste_13592
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3205442
crossref_primary_10_30935_cedtech_6137
crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2022_957199
crossref_primary_10_1177_10525629231200206
crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2023_1268585
crossref_primary_10_18178_ijiet_2018_8_2_1019
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_14_020114
crossref_primary_10_1515_CJAL_2023_0107
crossref_primary_10_1080_14623943_2022_2029737
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2021_100530
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2021_105049
crossref_primary_10_1002_nop2_492
crossref_primary_10_1108_ITSE_01_2021_0021
crossref_primary_10_12968_bjon_2017_26_2_93
crossref_primary_10_1080_18146627_2023_2210756
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1169957
crossref_primary_10_2174_1874434602115010291
crossref_primary_10_4018_IJICTE_2017070107
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_019_09920_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tele_2017_10_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12579
crossref_primary_10_4236_chnstd_2021_101003
crossref_primary_10_4018_IJDET_2017100106
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejphar_2025_177437
crossref_primary_10_1002_tl_20428
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11528_024_00974_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2020_104622
crossref_primary_10_1080_18146627_2016_1241667
crossref_primary_10_1089_cyber_2015_0073
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12981
crossref_primary_10_1142_S0219649222400068
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3226718
crossref_primary_10_18178_ijlt_5_4_285_291
crossref_primary_10_1080_03055698_2024_2405807
crossref_primary_10_21432_cjlt28012
crossref_primary_10_55813_gaea_ccri_v5_n1_400
crossref_primary_10_1080_10668926_2019_1647903
crossref_primary_10_1177_2373379920963660
crossref_primary_10_60027_ijsasr_2025_5371
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e14297
crossref_primary_10_12973_ejmse_5_1_27
crossref_primary_10_25159_2663_5895_10210
crossref_primary_10_3390_app12178846
crossref_primary_10_17263_jlls_547699
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43545_024_01006_4
crossref_primary_10_1088_1757_899X_482_1_012011
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_018_9748_9
crossref_primary_10_26634_jelt_13_1_19073
crossref_primary_10_1177_0162643420973216
crossref_primary_10_1152_advan_00079_2016
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_898171
crossref_primary_10_1080_03075079_2023_2298816
crossref_primary_10_1080_13603116_2017_1362048
crossref_primary_10_3390_j2040027
crossref_primary_10_1088_1742_6596_1700_1_012078
crossref_primary_10_1080_02188791_2022_2061912
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3203806
crossref_primary_10_7455_ijfs_11_1_2022_a1
crossref_primary_10_1177_1469787418801702
crossref_primary_10_1007_s44217_024_00239_y
crossref_primary_10_58723_finger_v1i1_20
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2015_04_006
crossref_primary_10_4018_IJMBL_2020010105
crossref_primary_10_1186_s41239_020_00226_x
crossref_primary_10_5812_ijvlms_10835
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2016_08_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iree_2017_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1177_02734753221090419
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11528_018_0342_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12528_023_09354_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2021_100585
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_016_9561_2
crossref_primary_10_1080_03075079_2019_1617683
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2015_06_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2019_06_003
crossref_primary_10_22599_bioj_119
crossref_primary_10_1080_02680513_2024_2342922
crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci11090557
crossref_primary_10_36681_tused_2024_030
crossref_primary_10_4195_nse2017_11_0023
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
10.1177/1932202X0902000402
10.1108/02621711211219059
10.14742/ajet.1039
10.3846/tede.2010.20
10.1177/0969733011398097
10.1108/00197850910950961
10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.015
10.1080/15512169.2011.539913
10.1007/s10459-009-9154-6
10.1111/j.1540-4609.2011.00325.x
10.1108/02637471211213398
10.3109/0142159X.2010.490860
10.1109/TE.2010.2083665
10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.027
10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008
10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030126
10.1108/00197850710742243
10.1111/j.1759-3441.2010.00094.x
10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02011.x
10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.014
10.1080/03043797.2011.619647
10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
10.1080/13583880802228224
10.1080/07377363.2012.649123
10.1080/13502930701321378
10.1080/03098265.2010.501552
10.5539/ies.v3n3p36
10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 Elsevier Inc.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7SW
BJH
BNH
BNI
BNJ
BNO
ERI
PET
REK
WWN
7QJ
DOI 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003
DatabaseName CrossRef
ERIC
ERIC (Ovid)
ERIC
ERIC
ERIC (Legacy Platform)
ERIC( SilverPlatter )
ERIC
ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)
Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
ERIC
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ERIC
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
DatabaseTitleList Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)

ERIC
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ERI
  name: ERIC
  url: https://eric.ed.gov/
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Education
EISSN 1873-5525
ERIC EJ1007158
EndPage 46
ExternalDocumentID EJ1007158
10_1016_j_iheduc_2012_12_003
S1096751612000863
GroupedDBID --K
--M
.~1
0R~
123
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
29J
4.4
457
4G.
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9M8
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFJI
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAXUO
ABFNM
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMMH
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
AEBSH
AEKER
AFKWA
AFTJW
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AKYCK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
AOMHK
ASPBG
AVARZ
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
PC.
PRBVW
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSB
SSO
SSZ
T5K
UHS
WH7
ZCA
~G-
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABWVN
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AGRNS
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
BNPGV
CITATION
SSH
77I
7SW
BJH
BNH
BNI
BNJ
BNO
EFKBS
ERI
PET
REK
WWN
7QJ
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-7c9d26b60287b36be134ceacbe7477ff9a959679278007c12c4588a0ad4eefda3
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 1096-7516
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 15:03:08 EDT 2025
Tue Sep 02 19:26:22 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:32:20 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:49 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:17:20 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess false
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Achievement
Blended learning
Student perceptions
e-Learning implementation
Educational policy
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c361t-7c9d26b60287b36be134ceacbe7477ff9a959679278007c12c4588a0ad4eefda3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 1417548458
PQPubID 24071
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1417548458
eric_primary_EJ1007158
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2012_12_003
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_iheduc_2012_12_003
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_iheduc_2012_12_003
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate July 2013
2013-07-00
20130701
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2013
  text: July 2013
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle The Internet and higher education
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Elsevier
References Learning Toolkit (bb0110) 2011
Kember, McNaught, Chong, Lam, Cheng (bb0100) 2010; 55
Melton, Graf, Chopak-Foss (bb0145) 2009; 3
Monahan (bb0160) 2010, April
Castle, McGuire (bb0030) 2010; 3
Poon (bb0200) 2012; 30
Hsu (bb0095) 2011; 18
Cavanagh (bb0035) 2011; 34
Pollock, Hamann, Wilson (bb0195) 2011; 7
Schuhmann, Skopek (bb0215) 2009; 10
Farley, Jain, Thomson (bb0075) 2011; 30
U.S. Department of Education (bb0240) 2010, September
Stacey, Gerbic (bb0225) 2008
Mitchell, Honore (bb0150) 2007; 39
Ashton, Elliott (bb0015) 2007; 15
Dziuban, Hartman, Juge, Moskal, Sorg (bb0065) 2006
Harris, Connolly, Feeney (bb0090) 2009; 41
Bliuc, Ellis, Goodyear, Piggott (bb0025) 2011; 56
Tabor (bb0235) 2007; 8
Alonso, Manrique, Martinez, Vines (bb0005) 2011; 54
McCarthy (bb0140) 2010; 26
Owston, Garrison, Cook (bb0185) 2006
Delaney (bb0060) 2008; 14
Monahan, P. (2011, April 05). Provost announces Academic Innovation Fund projects [Top Stories]. YFile. Retrieved September 25, 2012, from
Cook, Owston, Garrison (bb0055) 2004, October
Monahan (bb0165) 2010, April
Moore, Gilmartin (bb0180) 2010; 34
Reiss, Steffens (bb0205) 2010; 16
Collopy, Arnold (bb0050) 2009; 18
Martinez-Caro, Campuzano-Bolarin (bb0135) 2011; 36
Fleck (bb0080) 2012; 31
York University (bb0255) 2010
Lo (bb0125) 2010; 10
CLASSE (bb0045)
Lim, Morris, Kupritz (bb0115) 2006; 11
Lin, Wang (bb0120) 2012; 58
Lopez-Perez, Perez-Lopez, Rodriguez-Ariza (bb0130) 2011; 56
Moeller, Spitzer, Spreckelsen (bb0155) 2010; 32
Monahan, P. (2010c, December 16). Provost announces call for proposals for Academic Innovation Fund [Current News]. YFile. Retrieved September 25, 2012, from
Svanum, Aigner (bb0230) 2011; 81
Paechter, Maier, Macher (bb0190) 2010; 54
Garrison, Vaughan (bb0085) 2008
Korr, Derwin, Greene, Sokoloff (bb0105) 2012; 60
e-Learning Working Group (bb0070) 2010, June
Chou, Chou (bb0040) 2011; 9
Woltering, Herrler, Spitzer, Spreckelsen (bb0250) 2009; 14
Vaughan (bb0245) 2007; 6
Smyth, Houghton, Cooney, Casey (bb0220) 2012; 32
Artino, Stephens (bb0010) 2009; 20
Richardson (bb0210) 2011; 6
Battye, Carter (bb0020) 2009, June
Martinez-Caro (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0135) 2011; 36
Artino (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0010) 2009; 20
Paechter (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0190) 2010; 54
Monahan (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0160) 2010
Lin (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0120) 2012; 58
Hsu (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0095) 2011; 18
Battye (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0020) 2009
CLASSE (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0045)
Kember (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0100) 2010; 55
Lo (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0125) 2010; 10
Korr (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0105) 2012; 60
Smyth (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0220) 2012; 32
Delaney (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0060) 2008; 14
Garrison (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0085) 2008
York University (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0255) 2010
Chou (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0040) 2011; 9
Cavanagh (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0035) 2011; 34
Lim (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0115) 2006; 11
Ashton (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0015) 2007; 15
10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0175
Moore (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0180) 2010; 34
e-Learning Working Group (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0070) 2010
Reiss (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0205) 2010; 16
Stacey (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0225) 2008
McCarthy (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0140) 2010; 26
Vaughan (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0245) 2007; 6
Alonso (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0005) 2011; 54
Dziuban (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0065) 2006
10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0170
Collopy (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0050) 2009; 18
Lopez-Perez (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0130) 2011; 56
Pollock (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0195) 2011; 7
Bliuc (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0025) 2011; 56
Learning Toolkit (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0110)
Monahan (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0165) 2010
Fleck (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0080) 2012; 31
Owston (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0185) 2006
Harris (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0090) 2009; 41
Schuhmann (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0215) 2009; 10
Moeller (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0155) 2010; 32
Richardson (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0210) 2011; 6
Castle (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0030) 2010; 3
Farley (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0075) 2011; 30
Poon (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0200) 2012; 30
Cook (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0055) 2004
U.S. Department of Education (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0240) 2010
Mitchell (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0150) 2007; 39
Melton (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0145) 2009; 3
Svanum (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0230) 2011; 81
Tabor (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0235) 2007; 8
Woltering (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0250) 2009; 14
References_xml – start-page: 195
  year: 2006
  end-page: 208
  ident: bb0065
  article-title: Blended learning enters the mainstream
  publication-title: The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs
– volume: 41
  start-page: 155
  year: 2009
  end-page: 163
  ident: bb0090
  article-title: Blended learning: Overview and recommendations for successful implementation
  publication-title: Industrial and Commercial Training
– year: 2010, April
  ident: bb0160
  article-title: Building a more engaged university: Strategic directions for York University 2010–2020 (White Paper Companion)
– volume: 34
  year: 2011
  ident: bb0035
  article-title: The blended learning toolkit: Improving student performance and retention
  publication-title: Educause Review
– volume: 14
  start-page: 227
  year: 2008
  end-page: 241
  ident: bb0060
  article-title: Why faculty–student interaction matters in the first year experience
  publication-title: Tertiary Education and Management
– volume: 56
  start-page: 818
  year: 2011
  end-page: 826
  ident: bb0130
  article-title: Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes
  publication-title: Computers in Education
– year: 2004, October
  ident: bb0055
  article-title: Blended learning practices at COHERE universities (Tech. Rep. No. 2004–5)
– volume: 58
  start-page: 88
  year: 2012
  end-page: 99
  ident: bb0120
  article-title: Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning systems in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit
  publication-title: Computers in Education
– volume: 11
  start-page: 27
  year: 2006
  end-page: 42
  ident: bb0115
  article-title: Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction
  publication-title: Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks
– year: 2009, June
  ident: bb0020
  article-title: Report on the review of online and blended learning
– reference: Monahan, P. (2010c, December 16). Provost announces call for proposals for Academic Innovation Fund [Current News]. YFile. Retrieved September 25, 2012, from
– volume: 54
  start-page: 471
  year: 2011
  end-page: 478
  ident: bb0005
  article-title: How blended learning reduces underachievement in higher education: An experience in teaching computer sciences
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Education
– volume: 31
  start-page: 398
  year: 2012
  end-page: 411
  ident: bb0080
  article-title: Blended learning and learning communities: Opportunities and challenges
  publication-title: The Journal of Management Development
– volume: 26
  start-page: 729
  year: 2010
  end-page: 740
  ident: bb0140
  article-title: Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience
  publication-title: Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
– start-page: 338
  year: 2006
  end-page: 350
  ident: bb0185
  article-title: Blended learning at Canadian universities: Issues and practices
  publication-title: The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs
– volume: 54
  start-page: 222
  year: 2010
  end-page: 229
  ident: bb0190
  article-title: Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction
  publication-title: Computers in Education
– volume: 6
  start-page: 81
  year: 2007
  end-page: 94
  ident: bb0245
  article-title: Perspectives on blended learning in higher education
  publication-title: International Journal on E-Learning
– volume: 81
  start-page: 667
  year: 2011
  end-page: 679
  ident: bb0230
  article-title: The influences of course effort, mastery and performance goals, grade expectancies, and earned course grades on student ratings of course satisfaction
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Psychology
– volume: 7
  start-page: 48
  year: 2011
  end-page: 64
  ident: bb0195
  article-title: Learning through discussions: Comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings
  publication-title: Journal of Political Science Education
– volume: 14
  start-page: 725
  year: 2009
  end-page: 738
  ident: bb0250
  article-title: Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: Results of a mixed-method evaluation
  publication-title: Advances in Health Sciences Education
– year: 2010, April
  ident: bb0165
  article-title: Building a more engaged university: Strategic directions for York University 2010–2020 (White Paper Overview)
– volume: 10
  start-page: 219
  year: 2009
  end-page: 232
  ident: bb0215
  article-title: Blurring the lines: A blended learning model in a graduate public administration program
  publication-title: The Quarterly Review of Distance Education
– volume: 15
  start-page: 167
  year: 2007
  end-page: 181
  ident: bb0015
  article-title: Juggling the balls — Study, work, family and play: Student perspectives on flexible and blended heutagogy
  publication-title: European Early Childhood Education Research Journal
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1183
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1192
  ident: bb0100
  article-title: Understanding the ways in which design features of educational websites impact upon student learning outcomes in blended learning environments
  publication-title: Computers in Education
– year: 2010
  ident: bb0255
  article-title: University academic plan 2010–2015: Enhancing academic quality in a globalized world
– volume: 60
  start-page: 2
  year: 2012
  end-page: 11
  ident: bb0105
  article-title: Transitioning an adult-serving university to a blended learning model
  publication-title: The Journal of Continuing Higher Education
– volume: 18
  start-page: 418
  year: 2011
  end-page: 430
  ident: bb0095
  article-title: Blended learning in ethics education: A survey of nursing students
  publication-title: Nursing Ethics
– volume: 10
  start-page: 47
  year: 2010
  end-page: 54
  ident: bb0125
  article-title: How student satisfaction factors affect perceived learning
  publication-title: Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
– volume: 16
  start-page: 305
  year: 2010
  end-page: 326
  ident: bb0205
  article-title: Hybrid toolboxes: Conceptual and empirical analysis of blending patterns in application of hybrid media
  publication-title: Technological and Economic Development of Economy
– volume: 9
  start-page: 463
  year: 2011
  end-page: 484
  ident: bb0040
  article-title: Course management systems and blended learning: An innovative learning approach
  publication-title: Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education
– volume: 8
  start-page: 47
  year: 2007
  end-page: 57
  ident: bb0235
  article-title: Narrowing the distance: Implementing a hybrid learning model for information security education
  publication-title: The Quarterly Review of Distance Education
– volume: 30
  start-page: 129
  year: 2012
  end-page: 156
  ident: bb0200
  article-title: Use of blended learning to enhance the student learning experience and engagement in property education
  publication-title: Property Management
– year: 2010, September
  ident: bb0240
  article-title: Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies
– volume: 3
  start-page: 36
  year: 2010
  end-page: 40
  ident: bb0030
  article-title: An analysis of student self-assessment of online, blended, and face-to-face learning environments: Implications for sustainable education delivery
  publication-title: International Education Studies
– volume: 30
  start-page: 99
  year: 2011
  end-page: 108
  ident: bb0075
  article-title: Blended learning in finance: Comparing student perceptions of lectures, tutorials and online learning environments across different year levels
  publication-title: Economic Papers
– year: 2008
  ident: bb0085
  article-title: Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines
– volume: 56
  start-page: 856
  year: 2011
  end-page: 864
  ident: bb0025
  article-title: A blended learning approach to teaching foreign policy: Student experiences of learning through face-to-face and online discussion and their relationship to academic performance
  publication-title: Computers in Education
– year: 2010, June
  ident: bb0070
  article-title: e-Learning business case for York University (occasional report)
– volume: 34
  start-page: 327
  year: 2010
  end-page: 344
  ident: bb0180
  article-title: Teaching for better learning: A blended learning pilot project with first-year geography undergraduates
  publication-title: Journal of Geography in Higher Education
– year: 2008
  ident: bb0225
  article-title: Success factors for blended learning
– volume: 20
  start-page: 568
  year: 2009
  end-page: 601
  ident: bb0010
  article-title: Beyond grades in online learning: Adaptive profiles of academic self-regulation among naval academy undergraduates
  publication-title: Journal of Advanced Academics
– reference: Monahan, P. (2011, April 05). Provost announces Academic Innovation Fund projects [Top Stories]. YFile. Retrieved September 25, 2012, from
– volume: 36
  start-page: 473
  year: 2011
  end-page: 483
  ident: bb0135
  article-title: Factors affecting students' satisfaction in engineering disciplines: Traditional vs. blended approaches
  publication-title: European Journal of Engineering Education
– volume: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: bb0145
  article-title: Achievement and satisfaction in blended learning versus traditional general health course designs
  publication-title: International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
– volume: 32
  start-page: 464
  year: 2012
  end-page: 468
  ident: bb0220
  article-title: Students' experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes
  publication-title: Nurse Education Today
– volume: 6
  start-page: 135
  year: 2011
  end-page: 147
  ident: bb0210
  article-title: Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research
  publication-title: Educational Research Review
– volume: 18
  start-page: 85
  year: 2009
  end-page: 101
  ident: bb0050
  article-title: To blend or not to blend: Online and blended learning environments in undergraduate teacher education
  publication-title: Issues in Teacher Education
– volume: 39
  start-page: 143
  year: 2007
  end-page: 149
  ident: bb0150
  article-title: Criteria for successful blended learning
  publication-title: Industrial and Commercial Training
– year: 2011
  ident: bb0110
  article-title: Blended course student survey
– volume: 32
  start-page: 328
  year: 2010
  end-page: 346
  ident: bb0155
  article-title: How to configure blended problem based learning: Results of a randomized trial
  publication-title: Medical Teacher
– ident: bb0045
  article-title: Classroom survey of student engagement
– volume: 56
  start-page: 818
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0130
  article-title: Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes
  publication-title: Computers in Education
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
– volume: 20
  start-page: 568
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0010
  article-title: Beyond grades in online learning: Adaptive profiles of academic self-regulation among naval academy undergraduates
  publication-title: Journal of Advanced Academics
  doi: 10.1177/1932202X0902000402
– volume: 31
  start-page: 398
  issue: 4
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0080
  article-title: Blended learning and learning communities: Opportunities and challenges
  publication-title: The Journal of Management Development
  doi: 10.1108/02621711211219059
– volume: 11
  start-page: 27
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0115
  article-title: Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction
  publication-title: Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks
– volume: 26
  start-page: 729
  issue: 6
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0140
  article-title: Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience
  publication-title: Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
  doi: 10.14742/ajet.1039
– year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0165
– year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0055
  article-title: Blended learning practices at COHERE universities (Tech. Rep. No. 2004–5)
– volume: 16
  start-page: 305
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0205
  article-title: Hybrid toolboxes: Conceptual and empirical analysis of blending patterns in application of hybrid media
  publication-title: Technological and Economic Development of Economy
  doi: 10.3846/tede.2010.20
– volume: 18
  start-page: 418
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0095
  article-title: Blended learning in ethics education: A survey of nursing students
  publication-title: Nursing Ethics
  doi: 10.1177/0969733011398097
– volume: 41
  start-page: 155
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0090
  article-title: Blended learning: Overview and recommendations for successful implementation
  publication-title: Industrial and Commercial Training
  doi: 10.1108/00197850910950961
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1183
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0100
  article-title: Understanding the ways in which design features of educational websites impact upon student learning outcomes in blended learning environments
  publication-title: Computers in Education
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.015
– volume: 10
  start-page: 47
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0125
  article-title: How student satisfaction factors affect perceived learning
  publication-title: Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
– ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0170
– volume: 7
  start-page: 48
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0195
  article-title: Learning through discussions: Comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings
  publication-title: Journal of Political Science Education
  doi: 10.1080/15512169.2011.539913
– volume: 14
  start-page: 725
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0250
  article-title: Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: Results of a mixed-method evaluation
  publication-title: Advances in Health Sciences Education
  doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9154-6
– volume: 9
  start-page: 463
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0040
  article-title: Course management systems and blended learning: An innovative learning approach
  publication-title: Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education
  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2011.00325.x
– volume: 30
  start-page: 129
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0200
  article-title: Use of blended learning to enhance the student learning experience and engagement in property education
  publication-title: Property Management
  doi: 10.1108/02637471211213398
– volume: 32
  start-page: 328
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0155
  article-title: How to configure blended problem based learning: Results of a randomized trial
  publication-title: Medical Teacher
  doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.490860
– volume: 54
  start-page: 471
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0005
  article-title: How blended learning reduces underachievement in higher education: An experience in teaching computer sciences
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Education
  doi: 10.1109/TE.2010.2083665
– volume: 56
  start-page: 856
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0025
  article-title: A blended learning approach to teaching foreign policy: Student experiences of learning through face-to-face and online discussion and their relationship to academic performance
  publication-title: Computers in Education
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.027
– volume: 58
  start-page: 88
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0120
  article-title: Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning systems in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit
  publication-title: Computers in Education
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008
– volume: 3
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0145
  article-title: Achievement and satisfaction in blended learning versus traditional general health course designs
  publication-title: International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
  doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030126
– volume: 6
  start-page: 81
  issue: 1
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0245
  article-title: Perspectives on blended learning in higher education
  publication-title: International Journal on E-Learning
– volume: 39
  start-page: 143
  issue: 3
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0150
  article-title: Criteria for successful blended learning
  publication-title: Industrial and Commercial Training
  doi: 10.1108/00197850710742243
– year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0020
– ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0175
– volume: 30
  start-page: 99
  issue: 1
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0075
  article-title: Blended learning in finance: Comparing student perceptions of lectures, tutorials and online learning environments across different year levels
  publication-title: Economic Papers
  doi: 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2010.00094.x
– start-page: 338
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0185
  article-title: Blended learning at Canadian universities: Issues and practices
– ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0110
– volume: 81
  start-page: 667
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0230
  article-title: The influences of course effort, mastery and performance goals, grade expectancies, and earned course grades on student ratings of course satisfaction
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Psychology
  doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02011.x
– ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0045
– year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0160
– volume: 32
  start-page: 464
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0220
  article-title: Students' experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes
  publication-title: Nurse Education Today
  doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.014
– start-page: 195
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0065
  article-title: Blended learning enters the mainstream
– volume: 36
  start-page: 473
  issue: 5
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0135
  article-title: Factors affecting students' satisfaction in engineering disciplines: Traditional vs. blended approaches
  publication-title: European Journal of Engineering Education
  doi: 10.1080/03043797.2011.619647
– year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0085
– year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0240
– year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0225
  article-title: Success factors for blended learning
– volume: 54
  start-page: 222
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0190
  article-title: Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction
  publication-title: Computers in Education
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
– year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0255
– volume: 14
  start-page: 227
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0060
  article-title: Why faculty–student interaction matters in the first year experience
  publication-title: Tertiary Education and Management
  doi: 10.1080/13583880802228224
– volume: 8
  start-page: 47
  issue: 1
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0235
  article-title: Narrowing the distance: Implementing a hybrid learning model for information security education
  publication-title: The Quarterly Review of Distance Education
– year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0070
– volume: 34
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0035
  article-title: The blended learning toolkit: Improving student performance and retention
  publication-title: Educause Review
– volume: 60
  start-page: 2
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0105
  article-title: Transitioning an adult-serving university to a blended learning model
  publication-title: The Journal of Continuing Higher Education
  doi: 10.1080/07377363.2012.649123
– volume: 15
  start-page: 167
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0015
  article-title: Juggling the balls — Study, work, family and play: Student perspectives on flexible and blended heutagogy
  publication-title: European Early Childhood Education Research Journal
  doi: 10.1080/13502930701321378
– volume: 34
  start-page: 327
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0180
  article-title: Teaching for better learning: A blended learning pilot project with first-year geography undergraduates
  publication-title: Journal of Geography in Higher Education
  doi: 10.1080/03098265.2010.501552
– volume: 18
  start-page: 85
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0050
  article-title: To blend or not to blend: Online and blended learning environments in undergraduate teacher education
  publication-title: Issues in Teacher Education
– volume: 3
  start-page: 36
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0030
  article-title: An analysis of student self-assessment of online, blended, and face-to-face learning environments: Implications for sustainable education delivery
  publication-title: International Education Studies
  doi: 10.5539/ies.v3n3p36
– volume: 6
  start-page: 135
  issue: 2
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0210
  article-title: Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research
  publication-title: Educational Research Review
  doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
– volume: 10
  start-page: 219
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0215
  article-title: Blurring the lines: A blended learning model in a graduate public administration program
  publication-title: The Quarterly Review of Distance Education
SSID ssj0006853
Score 2.4662664
Snippet Examined in this study is the relationship between student perceptions in blended learning courses and their in-course achievement. The research was conducted...
SourceID proquest
eric
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 38
SubjectTerms Academic Achievement
Achievement
Attitudes
Blended Learning
Comparative Analysis
Correlation
Course Content
e-Learning implementation
Educational policy
Grade Point Average
Grades (Scholastic)
High achievers
Internet
Learner Engagement
Learning
Low Achievement
Outcomes of Education
Perceptions
Predictor Variables
Satisfaction
Scaling
Statistical Analysis
Student Attitudes
Student perceptions
Urban Universities
Title Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003
http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1007158
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1417548458
Volume 18
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3PS8MwFA5DL3oQnYo_RwSvcTZtk_Y4xmQqetGBnkqSplqRbrju6t_ue2k6HR4EoaeSkPBe-vIl_d73CDm_VGmMqcpMpTlnURymTAkjWGRNkcaK80DjfcfdvRhPopun-KlDhm0uDNIqfexvYrqL1v5N31uzPyvL_kMA6FvGgFi4A-ao-InqdbCmLz6_aR4iiRuSfSoYtm7T5xzHq3xFfVQkeHF3KdiWzvq9Pa2Sodt47Tahq22y5dEjHTQT3CEdW3Wx8LInaXTJ5g99wV3y_NAoV9LZN32FqiqnyKC0Tim8pmVFFV0s-RlUv7tbcerrSbzQuRewNdC0rEunFL5HJlejx-GY-VoKzIQiqJk04AuhBcAJqUOhbRBGBoKutnCekEWRgs_AnCmXgCClCbjBFFZ1qfLI2iJX4T5Zq6aVPSA0KYrA5IWWRuSRzG1iuciLWCRJoHRkkkMStibMjBcax3oX71nLKHvLGsNnaPgMHjD8IWHLXrNGaOOP9rL1TrayYDLYC_7ouY_OXI4yukGmSBDDxM9a92bwkeGfE1XZ6WIO5yNAWVECJjn697DHZIO7UhpI9T0ha_XHwp4CoKl1z63YHlkfXN-O73vuCP8FM672ng
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1NT9wwEB1tl0PLoeKjqLR8GImrtcRx7OSIEGhh2b0sSHCybMdpU6Gwguz_79hxFhAHJKScIlu2Zpzxs_PmDcDxiS4yn6pMdVEyyrO0oFpYQbmzVZFpxhLj7zumMzG-5Vd32d0AzvpcGE-rjLG_i-khWsc3o2jN0aKuR_ME0bfMELGwAMzTL7Dm1an4ENZOLyfj2SogizzrePaFoL5Dn0EXaF71Xy-R6jleLNwL9tWz3u9Qb_nQfcgO-9DFBnyPAJKcdnPchIFrtnzt5cjT2IL1VxKD23A_78QryeKFwUJ0UxJPonRBLLwldUM0Wa4oGsQ8hItxEktK_CHPUcPWYtO6rYNY-A-4vTi_ORvTWE6B2lQkLZUW3SGMQEQhTSqMS1JuMe4ah0cKWVUFug0tWjCJIFLahFmfxapPdMmdq0qd7sCweWzcTyB5VSW2rIy0ouSydLljoqwykeeJNtzmu5D2JlQ2ao37khcPqieV_VOd4ZU3vMIHDb8LdNVr0WltfNBe9t5Rb9aMwu3gg5473pmrUc6vPFkkyXDiR717FX5n_ueJbtzj8hmPSAi0eI4m-fXpYQ_h6_hmeq2uL2eT3_CNhcoanvm7B8P2aen2Ed-05iCu3__XNfhO
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student+perceptions+and+achievement+in+a+university+blended+learning+strategic+initiative&rft.jtitle=The+Internet+and+higher+education&rft.au=Owston%2C+Ron&rft.au=York%2C+Dennis&rft.au=Murtha%2C+Susan&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.issn=1096-7516&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=46&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.iheduc.2012.12.003&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1096-7516&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1096-7516&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1096-7516&client=summon