Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative
Examined in this study is the relationship between student perceptions in blended learning courses and their in-course achievement. The research was conducted at a large urban university that embarked on a major initiative to scale-up blended learning across its campus. Student perceptions (N=577) w...
Saved in:
Published in | The Internet and higher education Vol. 18; pp. 38 - 46 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Inc
01.07.2013
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1096-7516 1873-5525 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Examined in this study is the relationship between student perceptions in blended learning courses and their in-course achievement. The research was conducted at a large urban university that embarked on a major initiative to scale-up blended learning across its campus. Student perceptions (N=577) were assessed in four areas deemed important to the university: overall satisfaction with blended learning, convenience afforded by blended learning, sense of engagement in their blended course, and views on learning outcomes. Final course grade was the dependent variable and cumulative grade point average was the covariate in an ANCOVA design. A remarkably strong relationship was found between perceptions and grades. Compared with low achieving students, high achievers were the most satisfied with their blended course, would take one again, and preferred the blended format more over fully face-to-face or online. High achievers also found blended courses more convenient, more engaging, and they felt that they learn key course concepts better than in other traditional face-to-face courses they have taken. An implication of the study is that low achievers may not be able to cope with the blended environment as well their high achieving peers. Therefore, when scaling up blended learning institutions may want to consider offering students a choice of whether to enroll in blended or fully face-to-face course sections where feasible, especially in subject areas that students find difficult.
► Student perceptions of blended learning and achievement examined. ► Setting was a large urban university embarking on a major blended initiative. ► High achieverspreferred the blended format over fully face-to-face or online. ► Low achievers may have difficulty coping with the blended environment. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Examined in this study is the relationship between student perceptions in blended learning courses and their in-course achievement. The research was conducted at a large urban university that embarked on a major initiative to scale-up blended learning across its campus. Student perceptions (N = 577) were assessed in four areas deemed important to the university: overall satisfaction with blended learning, convenience afforded by blended learning, sense of engagement in their blended course, and views on learning outcomes. Final course grade was the dependent variable and cumulative grade point average was the covariate in an ANCOVA design. A remarkably strong relationship was found between perceptions and grades. Compared with low achieving students, high achievers were the most satisfied with their blended course, would take one again, and preferred the blended format more over fully face-to-face or online. High achievers also found blended courses more convenient, more engaging, and they felt that they learn key course concepts better than in other traditional face-to-face courses they have taken. An implication of the study is that low achievers may not be able to cope with the blended environment as well their high achieving peers. Therefore, when scaling up blended learning institutions may want to consider offering students a choice of whether to enroll in blended or fully face-to-face course sections where feasible, especially in subject areas that students find difficult. [Copyright Elsevier B.V.] Examined in this study is the relationship between student perceptions in blended learning courses and their in-course achievement. The research was conducted at a large urban university that embarked on a major initiative to scale-up blended learning across its campus. Student perceptions (N=577) were assessed in four areas deemed important to the university: overall satisfaction with blended learning, convenience afforded by blended learning, sense of engagement in their blended course, and views on learning outcomes. Final course grade was the dependent variable and cumulative grade point average was the covariate in an ANCOVA design. A remarkably strong relationship was found between perceptions and grades. Compared with low achieving students, high achievers were the most satisfied with their blended course, would take one again, and preferred the blended format more over fully face-to-face or online. High achievers also found blended courses more convenient, more engaging, and they felt that they learn key course concepts better than in other traditional face-to-face courses they have taken. An implication of the study is that low achievers may not be able to cope with the blended environment as well their high achieving peers. Therefore, when scaling up blended learning institutions may want to consider offering students a choice of whether to enroll in blended or fully face-to-face course sections where feasible, especially in subject areas that students find difficult. ► Student perceptions of blended learning and achievement examined. ► Setting was a large urban university embarking on a major blended initiative. ► High achieverspreferred the blended format over fully face-to-face or online. ► Low achievers may have difficulty coping with the blended environment. Examined in this study is the relationship between student perceptions in blended learning courses and their in-course achievement. The research was conducted at a large urban university that embarked on a major initiative to scale-up blended learning across its campus. Student perceptions (N = 577) were assessed in four areas deemed important to the university: overall satisfaction with blended learning, convenience afforded by blended learning, sense of engagement in their blended course, and views on learning outcomes. Final course grade was the dependent variable and cumulative grade point average was the covariate in an ANCOVA design. A remarkably strong relationship was found between perceptions and grades. Compared with low achieving students, high achievers were the most satisfied with their blended course, would take one again, and preferred the blended format more over fully face-to-face or online. High achievers also found blended courses more convenient, more engaging, and they felt that they learn key course concepts better than in other traditional face-to-face courses they have taken. An implication of the study is that low achievers may not be able to cope with the blended environment as well their high achieving peers. Therefore, when scaling up blended learning institutions may want to consider offering students a choice of whether to enroll in blended or fully face-to-face course sections where feasible, especially in subject areas that students find difficult. (Contains 3 tables.) |
Audience | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
Author | Owston, Ron York, Dennis Murtha, Susan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ron surname: Owston fullname: Owston, Ron email: rowston@edu.yorku.ca – sequence: 2 givenname: Dennis surname: York fullname: York, Dennis – sequence: 3 givenname: Susan surname: Murtha fullname: Murtha, Susan |
BackLink | http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1007158$$DView record in ERIC |
BookMark | eNqFkMtKLDEQhoMoeH0DhV666THpS9J9FsJBvCK4UBeuQrpSrTX0pOck6QHf3owjLs5CoaAK_gvFt8-23eiQsWPBZ4ILeTaf0RvaCWYFF8UsDeflFtsTjSrzui7q7XTzVuaqFnKX7Ycw55zLpi732MtjnCy6mC3RAy4jjS5kxtnMwBvhChdrjVxmssnRCn2g-J51AzqLNhvQeEfuNQvRm4ivBMlKkUxM1kO205sh4NHXPmDPV5dPFzf5_cP17cXf-xxKKWKuoLWF7CQvGtWVskNRVoAGOlSVUn3fmrZupWoL1XCuQBRQ1U1juLEVYm9NecBON71LP_6bMES9oAA4DMbhOAUtKqHqqkmpZD3ZWNET6KWnhfHv-vJOpGbxqVcbHfwYgsf-2yO4XpPWc70hrdekdZpEOsX-_BcDimaNMmGh4bfw-ddPidGK0OsAhA7QkkeI2o70c8EH71yewQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_24289_ijsser_1466943 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15108150 crossref_primary_10_1080_02680513_2021_1973399 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_023_11894_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_00219266_2021_1884586 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_024_13014_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2018_02_009 crossref_primary_10_4195_nse2017_05_0008 crossref_primary_10_1080_13691457_2021_1954890 crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2021_1946566 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jevs_2023_104537 crossref_primary_10_1002_tl_20458 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2021_100454 crossref_primary_10_1080_07294360_2018_1517732 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2022_100694 crossref_primary_10_1080_02680513_2017_1414587 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40299_020_00531_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2017_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12270 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_731720 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2017_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2022_100735 crossref_primary_10_1080_02680513_2020_1755642 crossref_primary_10_1080_03098265_2019_1600139 crossref_primary_10_1177_0735633117689892 crossref_primary_10_1108_ITSE_07_2018_0046 crossref_primary_10_30935_cedtech_6185 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2015_09_005 crossref_primary_10_1080_13562517_2022_2162816 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_021_02639_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2023_104809 crossref_primary_10_1109_RITA_2023_3250583 crossref_primary_10_1080_17512786_2022_2043767 crossref_primary_10_21432_cjlt27917 crossref_primary_10_4102_sajp_v77i1_1544 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0283513 crossref_primary_10_17718_tojde_973869 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0958344015000166 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_017_1009_x crossref_primary_10_30935_cedtech_12398 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41307_024_00359_y crossref_primary_10_1080_03075079_2022_2153246 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2021_100569 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjet_13475 crossref_primary_10_1177_21582440221093035 crossref_primary_10_18178_ijiet_2021_11_11_1563 crossref_primary_10_1080_20004508_2024_2361979 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13137074 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_022_11291_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_08838151_2015_1093481 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_12645 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci11080446 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sbspro_2015_11_107 crossref_primary_10_4000_dms_1012 crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2023_1222962 crossref_primary_10_4018_IJMBL_2019010103 crossref_primary_10_4236_ce_2020_112008 crossref_primary_10_1515_ijhp_2017_0025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_edurev_2017_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1080_18146627_2016_1241672 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2016_07_006 crossref_primary_10_1080_10899995_2021_1965419 crossref_primary_10_4018_IJMBL_291978 crossref_primary_10_54097_ijeh_v5i3_2799 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_022_11224_z crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2022_2121727 crossref_primary_10_1080_02763877_2019_1618780 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42330_021_00139_5 crossref_primary_10_1080_02103702_2023_2170109 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci10090242 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_021_10544_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aei_2021_101436 crossref_primary_10_1109_TE_2019_2918097 crossref_primary_10_1080_0144929X_2019_1623323 crossref_primary_10_1080_01587919_2022_2064825 crossref_primary_10_1080_09639284_2016_1274913 crossref_primary_10_1080_00131946_2021_1969932 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2018_06_026 crossref_primary_10_1051_shsconf_202214901004 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18158162 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2017_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1108_ITP_01_2016_0024 crossref_primary_10_1080_22041451_2020_1824264 crossref_primary_10_1080_0144929X_2017_1417481 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42452_023_05278_y crossref_primary_10_1108_INTR_04_2019_0155 crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2024_2442763 crossref_primary_10_1088_1742_6596_978_1_012006 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2022_880835 crossref_primary_10_3923_jas_2013_736_742 crossref_primary_10_29333_ejmste_13592 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3205442 crossref_primary_10_30935_cedtech_6137 crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2022_957199 crossref_primary_10_1177_10525629231200206 crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2023_1268585 crossref_primary_10_18178_ijiet_2018_8_2_1019 crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_14_020114 crossref_primary_10_1515_CJAL_2023_0107 crossref_primary_10_1080_14623943_2022_2029737 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2021_100530 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2021_105049 crossref_primary_10_1002_nop2_492 crossref_primary_10_1108_ITSE_01_2021_0021 crossref_primary_10_12968_bjon_2017_26_2_93 crossref_primary_10_1080_18146627_2023_2210756 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1169957 crossref_primary_10_2174_1874434602115010291 crossref_primary_10_4018_IJICTE_2017070107 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_019_09920_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tele_2017_10_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12579 crossref_primary_10_4236_chnstd_2021_101003 crossref_primary_10_4018_IJDET_2017100106 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejphar_2025_177437 crossref_primary_10_1002_tl_20428 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11528_024_00974_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2020_104622 crossref_primary_10_1080_18146627_2016_1241667 crossref_primary_10_1089_cyber_2015_0073 crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12981 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0219649222400068 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3226718 crossref_primary_10_18178_ijlt_5_4_285_291 crossref_primary_10_1080_03055698_2024_2405807 crossref_primary_10_21432_cjlt28012 crossref_primary_10_55813_gaea_ccri_v5_n1_400 crossref_primary_10_1080_10668926_2019_1647903 crossref_primary_10_1177_2373379920963660 crossref_primary_10_60027_ijsasr_2025_5371 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e14297 crossref_primary_10_12973_ejmse_5_1_27 crossref_primary_10_25159_2663_5895_10210 crossref_primary_10_3390_app12178846 crossref_primary_10_17263_jlls_547699 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43545_024_01006_4 crossref_primary_10_1088_1757_899X_482_1_012011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_018_9748_9 crossref_primary_10_26634_jelt_13_1_19073 crossref_primary_10_1177_0162643420973216 crossref_primary_10_1152_advan_00079_2016 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_898171 crossref_primary_10_1080_03075079_2023_2298816 crossref_primary_10_1080_13603116_2017_1362048 crossref_primary_10_3390_j2040027 crossref_primary_10_1088_1742_6596_1700_1_012078 crossref_primary_10_1080_02188791_2022_2061912 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3203806 crossref_primary_10_7455_ijfs_11_1_2022_a1 crossref_primary_10_1177_1469787418801702 crossref_primary_10_1007_s44217_024_00239_y crossref_primary_10_58723_finger_v1i1_20 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2015_04_006 crossref_primary_10_4018_IJMBL_2020010105 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41239_020_00226_x crossref_primary_10_5812_ijvlms_10835 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2016_08_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iree_2017_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1177_02734753221090419 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11528_018_0342_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12528_023_09354_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2021_100585 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_016_9561_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_03075079_2019_1617683 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2015_06_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2019_06_003 crossref_primary_10_22599_bioj_119 crossref_primary_10_1080_02680513_2024_2342922 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci11090557 crossref_primary_10_36681_tused_2024_030 crossref_primary_10_4195_nse2017_11_0023 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023 10.1177/1932202X0902000402 10.1108/02621711211219059 10.14742/ajet.1039 10.3846/tede.2010.20 10.1177/0969733011398097 10.1108/00197850910950961 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.015 10.1080/15512169.2011.539913 10.1007/s10459-009-9154-6 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2011.00325.x 10.1108/02637471211213398 10.3109/0142159X.2010.490860 10.1109/TE.2010.2083665 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.027 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008 10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030126 10.1108/00197850710742243 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2010.00094.x 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02011.x 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.014 10.1080/03043797.2011.619647 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005 10.1080/13583880802228224 10.1080/07377363.2012.649123 10.1080/13502930701321378 10.1080/03098265.2010.501552 10.5539/ies.v3n3p36 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 Elsevier Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 Elsevier Inc. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7SW BJH BNH BNI BNJ BNO ERI PET REK WWN 7QJ |
DOI | 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ERIC ERIC (Ovid) ERIC ERIC ERIC (Legacy Platform) ERIC( SilverPlatter ) ERIC ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform) Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) ERIC Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ERIC Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) |
DatabaseTitleList | Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) ERIC |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ERI name: ERIC url: https://eric.ed.gov/ sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering Education |
EISSN | 1873-5525 |
ERIC | EJ1007158 |
EndPage | 46 |
ExternalDocumentID | EJ1007158 10_1016_j_iheduc_2012_12_003 S1096751612000863 |
GroupedDBID | --K --M .~1 0R~ 123 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29J 4.4 457 4G. 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9M8 AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFJI AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AAXUO ABFNM ABIVO ABJNI ABMAC ABMMH ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACHQT ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD AEBSH AEKER AFKWA AFTJW AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AKYCK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ AOMHK ASPBG AVARZ AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 PC. PRBVW Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SPCBC SSB SSO SSZ T5K UHS WH7 ZCA ~G- AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AFXIZ AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP BNPGV CITATION SSH 77I 7SW BJH BNH BNI BNJ BNO EFKBS ERI PET REK WWN 7QJ |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-7c9d26b60287b36be134ceacbe7477ff9a959679278007c12c4588a0ad4eefda3 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 1096-7516 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 15:03:08 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 02 19:26:22 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:32:20 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:49 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:17:20 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | false |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Achievement Blended learning Student perceptions e-Learning implementation Educational policy |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c361t-7c9d26b60287b36be134ceacbe7477ff9a959679278007c12c4588a0ad4eefda3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PQID | 1417548458 |
PQPubID | 24071 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1417548458 eric_primary_EJ1007158 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2012_12_003 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_iheduc_2012_12_003 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_iheduc_2012_12_003 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | July 2013 2013-07-00 20130701 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2013 text: July 2013 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | The Internet and higher education |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc Elsevier |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc – name: Elsevier |
References | Learning Toolkit (bb0110) 2011 Kember, McNaught, Chong, Lam, Cheng (bb0100) 2010; 55 Melton, Graf, Chopak-Foss (bb0145) 2009; 3 Monahan (bb0160) 2010, April Castle, McGuire (bb0030) 2010; 3 Poon (bb0200) 2012; 30 Hsu (bb0095) 2011; 18 Cavanagh (bb0035) 2011; 34 Pollock, Hamann, Wilson (bb0195) 2011; 7 Schuhmann, Skopek (bb0215) 2009; 10 Farley, Jain, Thomson (bb0075) 2011; 30 U.S. Department of Education (bb0240) 2010, September Stacey, Gerbic (bb0225) 2008 Mitchell, Honore (bb0150) 2007; 39 Ashton, Elliott (bb0015) 2007; 15 Dziuban, Hartman, Juge, Moskal, Sorg (bb0065) 2006 Harris, Connolly, Feeney (bb0090) 2009; 41 Bliuc, Ellis, Goodyear, Piggott (bb0025) 2011; 56 Tabor (bb0235) 2007; 8 Alonso, Manrique, Martinez, Vines (bb0005) 2011; 54 McCarthy (bb0140) 2010; 26 Owston, Garrison, Cook (bb0185) 2006 Delaney (bb0060) 2008; 14 Monahan, P. (2011, April 05). Provost announces Academic Innovation Fund projects [Top Stories]. YFile. Retrieved September 25, 2012, from Cook, Owston, Garrison (bb0055) 2004, October Monahan (bb0165) 2010, April Moore, Gilmartin (bb0180) 2010; 34 Reiss, Steffens (bb0205) 2010; 16 Collopy, Arnold (bb0050) 2009; 18 Martinez-Caro, Campuzano-Bolarin (bb0135) 2011; 36 Fleck (bb0080) 2012; 31 York University (bb0255) 2010 Lo (bb0125) 2010; 10 CLASSE (bb0045) Lim, Morris, Kupritz (bb0115) 2006; 11 Lin, Wang (bb0120) 2012; 58 Lopez-Perez, Perez-Lopez, Rodriguez-Ariza (bb0130) 2011; 56 Moeller, Spitzer, Spreckelsen (bb0155) 2010; 32 Monahan, P. (2010c, December 16). Provost announces call for proposals for Academic Innovation Fund [Current News]. YFile. Retrieved September 25, 2012, from Svanum, Aigner (bb0230) 2011; 81 Paechter, Maier, Macher (bb0190) 2010; 54 Garrison, Vaughan (bb0085) 2008 Korr, Derwin, Greene, Sokoloff (bb0105) 2012; 60 e-Learning Working Group (bb0070) 2010, June Chou, Chou (bb0040) 2011; 9 Woltering, Herrler, Spitzer, Spreckelsen (bb0250) 2009; 14 Vaughan (bb0245) 2007; 6 Smyth, Houghton, Cooney, Casey (bb0220) 2012; 32 Artino, Stephens (bb0010) 2009; 20 Richardson (bb0210) 2011; 6 Battye, Carter (bb0020) 2009, June Martinez-Caro (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0135) 2011; 36 Artino (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0010) 2009; 20 Paechter (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0190) 2010; 54 Monahan (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0160) 2010 Lin (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0120) 2012; 58 Hsu (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0095) 2011; 18 Battye (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0020) 2009 CLASSE (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0045) Kember (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0100) 2010; 55 Lo (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0125) 2010; 10 Korr (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0105) 2012; 60 Smyth (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0220) 2012; 32 Delaney (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0060) 2008; 14 Garrison (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0085) 2008 York University (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0255) 2010 Chou (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0040) 2011; 9 Cavanagh (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0035) 2011; 34 Lim (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0115) 2006; 11 Ashton (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0015) 2007; 15 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0175 Moore (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0180) 2010; 34 e-Learning Working Group (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0070) 2010 Reiss (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0205) 2010; 16 Stacey (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0225) 2008 McCarthy (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0140) 2010; 26 Vaughan (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0245) 2007; 6 Alonso (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0005) 2011; 54 Dziuban (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0065) 2006 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0170 Collopy (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0050) 2009; 18 Lopez-Perez (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0130) 2011; 56 Pollock (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0195) 2011; 7 Bliuc (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0025) 2011; 56 Learning Toolkit (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0110) Monahan (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0165) 2010 Fleck (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0080) 2012; 31 Owston (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0185) 2006 Harris (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0090) 2009; 41 Schuhmann (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0215) 2009; 10 Moeller (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0155) 2010; 32 Richardson (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0210) 2011; 6 Castle (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0030) 2010; 3 Farley (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0075) 2011; 30 Poon (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0200) 2012; 30 Cook (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0055) 2004 U.S. Department of Education (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0240) 2010 Mitchell (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0150) 2007; 39 Melton (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0145) 2009; 3 Svanum (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0230) 2011; 81 Tabor (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0235) 2007; 8 Woltering (10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0250) 2009; 14 |
References_xml | – start-page: 195 year: 2006 end-page: 208 ident: bb0065 article-title: Blended learning enters the mainstream publication-title: The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs – volume: 41 start-page: 155 year: 2009 end-page: 163 ident: bb0090 article-title: Blended learning: Overview and recommendations for successful implementation publication-title: Industrial and Commercial Training – year: 2010, April ident: bb0160 article-title: Building a more engaged university: Strategic directions for York University 2010–2020 (White Paper Companion) – volume: 34 year: 2011 ident: bb0035 article-title: The blended learning toolkit: Improving student performance and retention publication-title: Educause Review – volume: 14 start-page: 227 year: 2008 end-page: 241 ident: bb0060 article-title: Why faculty–student interaction matters in the first year experience publication-title: Tertiary Education and Management – volume: 56 start-page: 818 year: 2011 end-page: 826 ident: bb0130 article-title: Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes publication-title: Computers in Education – year: 2004, October ident: bb0055 article-title: Blended learning practices at COHERE universities (Tech. Rep. No. 2004–5) – volume: 58 start-page: 88 year: 2012 end-page: 99 ident: bb0120 article-title: Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning systems in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit publication-title: Computers in Education – volume: 11 start-page: 27 year: 2006 end-page: 42 ident: bb0115 article-title: Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction publication-title: Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks – year: 2009, June ident: bb0020 article-title: Report on the review of online and blended learning – reference: Monahan, P. (2010c, December 16). Provost announces call for proposals for Academic Innovation Fund [Current News]. YFile. Retrieved September 25, 2012, from – volume: 54 start-page: 471 year: 2011 end-page: 478 ident: bb0005 article-title: How blended learning reduces underachievement in higher education: An experience in teaching computer sciences publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Education – volume: 31 start-page: 398 year: 2012 end-page: 411 ident: bb0080 article-title: Blended learning and learning communities: Opportunities and challenges publication-title: The Journal of Management Development – volume: 26 start-page: 729 year: 2010 end-page: 740 ident: bb0140 article-title: Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience publication-title: Australasian Journal of Educational Technology – start-page: 338 year: 2006 end-page: 350 ident: bb0185 article-title: Blended learning at Canadian universities: Issues and practices publication-title: The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs – volume: 54 start-page: 222 year: 2010 end-page: 229 ident: bb0190 article-title: Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction publication-title: Computers in Education – volume: 6 start-page: 81 year: 2007 end-page: 94 ident: bb0245 article-title: Perspectives on blended learning in higher education publication-title: International Journal on E-Learning – volume: 81 start-page: 667 year: 2011 end-page: 679 ident: bb0230 article-title: The influences of course effort, mastery and performance goals, grade expectancies, and earned course grades on student ratings of course satisfaction publication-title: British Journal of Educational Psychology – volume: 7 start-page: 48 year: 2011 end-page: 64 ident: bb0195 article-title: Learning through discussions: Comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings publication-title: Journal of Political Science Education – volume: 14 start-page: 725 year: 2009 end-page: 738 ident: bb0250 article-title: Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: Results of a mixed-method evaluation publication-title: Advances in Health Sciences Education – year: 2010, April ident: bb0165 article-title: Building a more engaged university: Strategic directions for York University 2010–2020 (White Paper Overview) – volume: 10 start-page: 219 year: 2009 end-page: 232 ident: bb0215 article-title: Blurring the lines: A blended learning model in a graduate public administration program publication-title: The Quarterly Review of Distance Education – volume: 15 start-page: 167 year: 2007 end-page: 181 ident: bb0015 article-title: Juggling the balls — Study, work, family and play: Student perspectives on flexible and blended heutagogy publication-title: European Early Childhood Education Research Journal – volume: 55 start-page: 1183 year: 2010 end-page: 1192 ident: bb0100 article-title: Understanding the ways in which design features of educational websites impact upon student learning outcomes in blended learning environments publication-title: Computers in Education – year: 2010 ident: bb0255 article-title: University academic plan 2010–2015: Enhancing academic quality in a globalized world – volume: 60 start-page: 2 year: 2012 end-page: 11 ident: bb0105 article-title: Transitioning an adult-serving university to a blended learning model publication-title: The Journal of Continuing Higher Education – volume: 18 start-page: 418 year: 2011 end-page: 430 ident: bb0095 article-title: Blended learning in ethics education: A survey of nursing students publication-title: Nursing Ethics – volume: 10 start-page: 47 year: 2010 end-page: 54 ident: bb0125 article-title: How student satisfaction factors affect perceived learning publication-title: Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning – volume: 16 start-page: 305 year: 2010 end-page: 326 ident: bb0205 article-title: Hybrid toolboxes: Conceptual and empirical analysis of blending patterns in application of hybrid media publication-title: Technological and Economic Development of Economy – volume: 9 start-page: 463 year: 2011 end-page: 484 ident: bb0040 article-title: Course management systems and blended learning: An innovative learning approach publication-title: Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education – volume: 8 start-page: 47 year: 2007 end-page: 57 ident: bb0235 article-title: Narrowing the distance: Implementing a hybrid learning model for information security education publication-title: The Quarterly Review of Distance Education – volume: 30 start-page: 129 year: 2012 end-page: 156 ident: bb0200 article-title: Use of blended learning to enhance the student learning experience and engagement in property education publication-title: Property Management – year: 2010, September ident: bb0240 article-title: Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies – volume: 3 start-page: 36 year: 2010 end-page: 40 ident: bb0030 article-title: An analysis of student self-assessment of online, blended, and face-to-face learning environments: Implications for sustainable education delivery publication-title: International Education Studies – volume: 30 start-page: 99 year: 2011 end-page: 108 ident: bb0075 article-title: Blended learning in finance: Comparing student perceptions of lectures, tutorials and online learning environments across different year levels publication-title: Economic Papers – year: 2008 ident: bb0085 article-title: Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines – volume: 56 start-page: 856 year: 2011 end-page: 864 ident: bb0025 article-title: A blended learning approach to teaching foreign policy: Student experiences of learning through face-to-face and online discussion and their relationship to academic performance publication-title: Computers in Education – year: 2010, June ident: bb0070 article-title: e-Learning business case for York University (occasional report) – volume: 34 start-page: 327 year: 2010 end-page: 344 ident: bb0180 article-title: Teaching for better learning: A blended learning pilot project with first-year geography undergraduates publication-title: Journal of Geography in Higher Education – year: 2008 ident: bb0225 article-title: Success factors for blended learning – volume: 20 start-page: 568 year: 2009 end-page: 601 ident: bb0010 article-title: Beyond grades in online learning: Adaptive profiles of academic self-regulation among naval academy undergraduates publication-title: Journal of Advanced Academics – reference: Monahan, P. (2011, April 05). Provost announces Academic Innovation Fund projects [Top Stories]. YFile. Retrieved September 25, 2012, from – volume: 36 start-page: 473 year: 2011 end-page: 483 ident: bb0135 article-title: Factors affecting students' satisfaction in engineering disciplines: Traditional vs. blended approaches publication-title: European Journal of Engineering Education – volume: 3 year: 2009 ident: bb0145 article-title: Achievement and satisfaction in blended learning versus traditional general health course designs publication-title: International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning – volume: 32 start-page: 464 year: 2012 end-page: 468 ident: bb0220 article-title: Students' experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes publication-title: Nurse Education Today – volume: 6 start-page: 135 year: 2011 end-page: 147 ident: bb0210 article-title: Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research publication-title: Educational Research Review – volume: 18 start-page: 85 year: 2009 end-page: 101 ident: bb0050 article-title: To blend or not to blend: Online and blended learning environments in undergraduate teacher education publication-title: Issues in Teacher Education – volume: 39 start-page: 143 year: 2007 end-page: 149 ident: bb0150 article-title: Criteria for successful blended learning publication-title: Industrial and Commercial Training – year: 2011 ident: bb0110 article-title: Blended course student survey – volume: 32 start-page: 328 year: 2010 end-page: 346 ident: bb0155 article-title: How to configure blended problem based learning: Results of a randomized trial publication-title: Medical Teacher – ident: bb0045 article-title: Classroom survey of student engagement – volume: 56 start-page: 818 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0130 article-title: Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes publication-title: Computers in Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023 – volume: 20 start-page: 568 issue: 4 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0010 article-title: Beyond grades in online learning: Adaptive profiles of academic self-regulation among naval academy undergraduates publication-title: Journal of Advanced Academics doi: 10.1177/1932202X0902000402 – volume: 31 start-page: 398 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0080 article-title: Blended learning and learning communities: Opportunities and challenges publication-title: The Journal of Management Development doi: 10.1108/02621711211219059 – volume: 11 start-page: 27 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0115 article-title: Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction publication-title: Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks – volume: 26 start-page: 729 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0140 article-title: Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience publication-title: Australasian Journal of Educational Technology doi: 10.14742/ajet.1039 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0165 – year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0055 article-title: Blended learning practices at COHERE universities (Tech. Rep. No. 2004–5) – volume: 16 start-page: 305 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0205 article-title: Hybrid toolboxes: Conceptual and empirical analysis of blending patterns in application of hybrid media publication-title: Technological and Economic Development of Economy doi: 10.3846/tede.2010.20 – volume: 18 start-page: 418 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0095 article-title: Blended learning in ethics education: A survey of nursing students publication-title: Nursing Ethics doi: 10.1177/0969733011398097 – volume: 41 start-page: 155 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0090 article-title: Blended learning: Overview and recommendations for successful implementation publication-title: Industrial and Commercial Training doi: 10.1108/00197850910950961 – volume: 55 start-page: 1183 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0100 article-title: Understanding the ways in which design features of educational websites impact upon student learning outcomes in blended learning environments publication-title: Computers in Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.015 – volume: 10 start-page: 47 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0125 article-title: How student satisfaction factors affect perceived learning publication-title: Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning – ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0170 – volume: 7 start-page: 48 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0195 article-title: Learning through discussions: Comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings publication-title: Journal of Political Science Education doi: 10.1080/15512169.2011.539913 – volume: 14 start-page: 725 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0250 article-title: Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: Results of a mixed-method evaluation publication-title: Advances in Health Sciences Education doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9154-6 – volume: 9 start-page: 463 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0040 article-title: Course management systems and blended learning: An innovative learning approach publication-title: Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2011.00325.x – volume: 30 start-page: 129 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0200 article-title: Use of blended learning to enhance the student learning experience and engagement in property education publication-title: Property Management doi: 10.1108/02637471211213398 – volume: 32 start-page: 328 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0155 article-title: How to configure blended problem based learning: Results of a randomized trial publication-title: Medical Teacher doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.490860 – volume: 54 start-page: 471 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0005 article-title: How blended learning reduces underachievement in higher education: An experience in teaching computer sciences publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Education doi: 10.1109/TE.2010.2083665 – volume: 56 start-page: 856 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0025 article-title: A blended learning approach to teaching foreign policy: Student experiences of learning through face-to-face and online discussion and their relationship to academic performance publication-title: Computers in Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.027 – volume: 58 start-page: 88 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0120 article-title: Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning systems in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit publication-title: Computers in Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008 – volume: 3 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0145 article-title: Achievement and satisfaction in blended learning versus traditional general health course designs publication-title: International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030126 – volume: 6 start-page: 81 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0245 article-title: Perspectives on blended learning in higher education publication-title: International Journal on E-Learning – volume: 39 start-page: 143 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0150 article-title: Criteria for successful blended learning publication-title: Industrial and Commercial Training doi: 10.1108/00197850710742243 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0020 – ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0175 – volume: 30 start-page: 99 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0075 article-title: Blended learning in finance: Comparing student perceptions of lectures, tutorials and online learning environments across different year levels publication-title: Economic Papers doi: 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2010.00094.x – start-page: 338 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0185 article-title: Blended learning at Canadian universities: Issues and practices – ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0110 – volume: 81 start-page: 667 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0230 article-title: The influences of course effort, mastery and performance goals, grade expectancies, and earned course grades on student ratings of course satisfaction publication-title: British Journal of Educational Psychology doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02011.x – ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0045 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0160 – volume: 32 start-page: 464 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0220 article-title: Students' experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes publication-title: Nurse Education Today doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.014 – start-page: 195 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0065 article-title: Blended learning enters the mainstream – volume: 36 start-page: 473 issue: 5 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0135 article-title: Factors affecting students' satisfaction in engineering disciplines: Traditional vs. blended approaches publication-title: European Journal of Engineering Education doi: 10.1080/03043797.2011.619647 – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0085 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0240 – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0225 article-title: Success factors for blended learning – volume: 54 start-page: 222 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0190 article-title: Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction publication-title: Computers in Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0255 – volume: 14 start-page: 227 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0060 article-title: Why faculty–student interaction matters in the first year experience publication-title: Tertiary Education and Management doi: 10.1080/13583880802228224 – volume: 8 start-page: 47 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0235 article-title: Narrowing the distance: Implementing a hybrid learning model for information security education publication-title: The Quarterly Review of Distance Education – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0070 – volume: 34 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0035 article-title: The blended learning toolkit: Improving student performance and retention publication-title: Educause Review – volume: 60 start-page: 2 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0105 article-title: Transitioning an adult-serving university to a blended learning model publication-title: The Journal of Continuing Higher Education doi: 10.1080/07377363.2012.649123 – volume: 15 start-page: 167 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0015 article-title: Juggling the balls — Study, work, family and play: Student perspectives on flexible and blended heutagogy publication-title: European Early Childhood Education Research Journal doi: 10.1080/13502930701321378 – volume: 34 start-page: 327 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0180 article-title: Teaching for better learning: A blended learning pilot project with first-year geography undergraduates publication-title: Journal of Geography in Higher Education doi: 10.1080/03098265.2010.501552 – volume: 18 start-page: 85 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0050 article-title: To blend or not to blend: Online and blended learning environments in undergraduate teacher education publication-title: Issues in Teacher Education – volume: 3 start-page: 36 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0030 article-title: An analysis of student self-assessment of online, blended, and face-to-face learning environments: Implications for sustainable education delivery publication-title: International Education Studies doi: 10.5539/ies.v3n3p36 – volume: 6 start-page: 135 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0210 article-title: Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research publication-title: Educational Research Review doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001 – volume: 10 start-page: 219 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003_bb0215 article-title: Blurring the lines: A blended learning model in a graduate public administration program publication-title: The Quarterly Review of Distance Education |
SSID | ssj0006853 |
Score | 2.4662664 |
Snippet | Examined in this study is the relationship between student perceptions in blended learning courses and their in-course achievement. The research was conducted... |
SourceID | proquest eric crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 38 |
SubjectTerms | Academic Achievement Achievement Attitudes Blended Learning Comparative Analysis Correlation Course Content e-Learning implementation Educational policy Grade Point Average Grades (Scholastic) High achievers Internet Learner Engagement Learning Low Achievement Outcomes of Education Perceptions Predictor Variables Satisfaction Scaling Statistical Analysis Student Attitudes Student perceptions Urban Universities |
Title | Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003 http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1007158 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1417548458 |
Volume | 18 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3PS8MwFA5DL3oQnYo_RwSvcTZtk_Y4xmQqetGBnkqSplqRbrju6t_ue2k6HR4EoaeSkPBe-vIl_d73CDm_VGmMqcpMpTlnURymTAkjWGRNkcaK80DjfcfdvRhPopun-KlDhm0uDNIqfexvYrqL1v5N31uzPyvL_kMA6FvGgFi4A-ao-InqdbCmLz6_aR4iiRuSfSoYtm7T5xzHq3xFfVQkeHF3KdiWzvq9Pa2Sodt47Tahq22y5dEjHTQT3CEdW3Wx8LInaXTJ5g99wV3y_NAoV9LZN32FqiqnyKC0Tim8pmVFFV0s-RlUv7tbcerrSbzQuRewNdC0rEunFL5HJlejx-GY-VoKzIQiqJk04AuhBcAJqUOhbRBGBoKutnCekEWRgs_AnCmXgCClCbjBFFZ1qfLI2iJX4T5Zq6aVPSA0KYrA5IWWRuSRzG1iuciLWCRJoHRkkkMStibMjBcax3oX71nLKHvLGsNnaPgMHjD8IWHLXrNGaOOP9rL1TrayYDLYC_7ouY_OXI4yukGmSBDDxM9a92bwkeGfE1XZ6WIO5yNAWVECJjn697DHZIO7UhpI9T0ha_XHwp4CoKl1z63YHlkfXN-O73vuCP8FM672ng |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1NT9wwEB1tl0PLoeKjqLR8GImrtcRx7OSIEGhh2b0sSHCybMdpU6Gwguz_79hxFhAHJKScIlu2Zpzxs_PmDcDxiS4yn6pMdVEyyrO0oFpYQbmzVZFpxhLj7zumMzG-5Vd32d0AzvpcGE-rjLG_i-khWsc3o2jN0aKuR_ME0bfMELGwAMzTL7Dm1an4ENZOLyfj2SogizzrePaFoL5Dn0EXaF71Xy-R6jleLNwL9tWz3u9Qb_nQfcgO-9DFBnyPAJKcdnPchIFrtnzt5cjT2IL1VxKD23A_78QryeKFwUJ0UxJPonRBLLwldUM0Wa4oGsQ8hItxEktK_CHPUcPWYtO6rYNY-A-4vTi_ORvTWE6B2lQkLZUW3SGMQEQhTSqMS1JuMe4ah0cKWVUFug0tWjCJIFLahFmfxapPdMmdq0qd7sCweWzcTyB5VSW2rIy0ouSydLljoqwykeeJNtzmu5D2JlQ2ao37khcPqieV_VOd4ZU3vMIHDb8LdNVr0WltfNBe9t5Rb9aMwu3gg5473pmrUc6vPFkkyXDiR717FX5n_ueJbtzj8hmPSAi0eI4m-fXpYQ_h6_hmeq2uL2eT3_CNhcoanvm7B8P2aen2Ed-05iCu3__XNfhO |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student+perceptions+and+achievement+in+a+university+blended+learning+strategic+initiative&rft.jtitle=The+Internet+and+higher+education&rft.au=Owston%2C+Ron&rft.au=York%2C+Dennis&rft.au=Murtha%2C+Susan&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.issn=1096-7516&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=46&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.iheduc.2012.12.003&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1096-7516&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1096-7516&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1096-7516&client=summon |