Laboratory investigation of railway-used ballast morphology using 3D imaging data analyses

Railway ballast deteriorates over time due to cyclic loading and environmental factors, necessitating its replacement to maintain track stability. However, the potential shortage of fresh ballast has posed challenges in replacing used ballast. One of the challenges in recycling used ballast is deter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCase Studies in Construction Materials Vol. 19; p. e02272
Main Authors Varuntanya, Krittaya, Kwunjai, Sararat, Binaree, Theechalit, Jitsangiam, Peerapong, Jing, Guoqing, Aela, Peyman
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2023
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Railway ballast deteriorates over time due to cyclic loading and environmental factors, necessitating its replacement to maintain track stability. However, the potential shortage of fresh ballast has posed challenges in replacing used ballast. One of the challenges in recycling used ballast is determining its useful life. This study proposes a method to characterize fresh and used ballast morphology and shape properties using digital images and advanced data analysis software. The aim is to establish a threshold that distinguishes when ballast can be considered “used.”. The study utilizes basic morphology parameters of flatness, elongation, roundness, sphericity, and convexity. Used ballast is generated through the Los Angeles abrasion (LAA) test method, while fresh ballast serves as the control sample. The analysis suggests that specific combinations of shape indices, such as roundness and convexity, offer insights into differentiating between the two types of ballast. Notably, significant differences are observed in the sphericity and convexity indices between fresh and used ballast samples. However, A systematic definition of used ballast based on the basic morphology indices alone was not feasible. Only the combination of sphericity index (> 0.825) and convexity index (> 0.9), by which both indices of used ballast were higher than those of fresh ballast, could roughly classify fresh and used ballast, although a minor overlap persisted. Further exploration of the data using advanced statistical techniques and machine learning could enhance the accuracy of defining used ballast.
ISSN:2214-5095
2214-5095
DOI:10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02272