A Comprehensive Portrait of Teleradiology in Radiology Practices: Results from the American College of Radiology's 1999 Survey

This article presents a comprehensive portrait of the characteristics of teleradiology systems of radiology practices as of 1999. Our purposes are to help profile a rapidly evolving area of radiology that has been underexamined to date and to provide a baseline with which future findings can be comp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 185; no. 1; pp. 24 - 35
Main Authors Larson, David B, Cypel, Yasmin S, Forman, Howard P, Sunshine, Jonathan H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Leesburg, VA Am Roentgen Ray Soc 01.07.2005
American Roentgen Ray Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This article presents a comprehensive portrait of the characteristics of teleradiology systems of radiology practices as of 1999. Our purposes are to help profile a rapidly evolving area of radiology that has been underexamined to date and to provide a baseline with which future findings can be compared. In 1999, the American College of Radiology surveyed 970 practices by mail. A response rate of 66% was achieved. Responses were weighted to represent all radiology practices in the United States. Data from nine questions specifically designed to profile the use of teleradiology were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods and multivariate regression analyses. Seventy-one percent of multiradiologist practices had teleradiology systems in place, using them to interpret 5% of their studies. For solo practices, corresponding statistics were 30% and 14%. Ninety-two percent of multiradiologist practices with teleradiology systems used them for preliminary on-call interpretation. Other major uses included consultation with other radiologists (20%) and primary interpretation of studies (18%). Ninety-five percent of multiradiologist practices with teleradiology systems used them to interpret CT, 84% used them for sonography, 69% for nuclear medicine, 47% for MRI, and 43% for conventional radiographs. Teleradiology had already become a fixture in most practices by 1999, though it was used for only a small fraction of image interpretations. Its widespread presence positioned teleradiology to become a key element of radiology practice nationwide.
AbstractList OBJECTIVEThis article presents a comprehensive portrait of the characteristics of teleradiology systems of radiology practices as of 1999. Our purposes are to help profile a rapidly evolving area of radiology that has been underexamined to date and to provide a baseline with which future findings can be compared.MATERIALS AND METHODSIn 1999, the American College of Radiology surveyed 970 practices by mail. A response rate of 66% was achieved. Responses were weighted to represent all radiology practices in the United States. Data from nine questions specifically designed to profile the use of teleradiology were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods and multivariate regression analyses.RESULTSSeventy-one percent of multiradiologist practices had teleradiology systems in place, using them to interpret 5% of their studies. For solo practices, corresponding statistics were 30% and 14%. Ninety-two percent of multiradiologist practices with teleradiology systems used them for preliminary on-call interpretation. Other major uses included consultation with other radiologists (20%) and primary interpretation of studies (18%). Ninety-five percent of multiradiologist practices with teleradiology systems used them to interpret CT, 84% used them for sonography, 69% for nuclear medicine, 47% for MRI, and 43% for conventional radiographs.CONCLUSIONTeleradiology had already become a fixture in most practices by 1999, though it was used for only a small fraction of image interpretations. Its widespread presence positioned teleradiology to become a key element of radiology practice nationwide.
This article presents a comprehensive portrait of the characteristics of teleradiology systems of radiology practices as of 1999. Our purposes are to help profile a rapidly evolving area of radiology that has been underexamined to date and to provide a baseline with which future findings can be compared. In 1999, the American College of Radiology surveyed 970 practices by mail. A response rate of 66% was achieved. Responses were weighted to represent all radiology practices in the United States. Data from nine questions specifically designed to profile the use of teleradiology were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods and multivariate regression analyses. Seventy-one percent of multiradiologist practices had teleradiology systems in place, using them to interpret 5% of their studies. For solo practices, corresponding statistics were 30% and 14%. Ninety-two percent of multiradiologist practices with teleradiology systems used them for preliminary on-call interpretation. Other major uses included consultation with other radiologists (20%) and primary interpretation of studies (18%). Ninety-five percent of multiradiologist practices with teleradiology systems used them to interpret CT, 84% used them for sonography, 69% for nuclear medicine, 47% for MRI, and 43% for conventional radiographs. Teleradiology had already become a fixture in most practices by 1999, though it was used for only a small fraction of image interpretations. Its widespread presence positioned teleradiology to become a key element of radiology practice nationwide.
Author Cypel, Yasmin S
Forman, Howard P
Sunshine, Jonathan H
Larson, David B
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Larson, David B
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Cypel, Yasmin S
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Forman, Howard P
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Sunshine, Jonathan H
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16881210$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15972394$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpFkEFr2zAYhsVoWdNuf2CHocu6k1NJlmxptxC2rlBo6TrYTUj250RFtjLJbshlv70qyZrTh-B53xc95-hkCAMg9ImSOWOUX5mnOKdSzOmc5EMI4-_QjApeFSXl9ATNSFnRQpLyzxk6T-mJEFJLVb9HZ1SompWKz9C_BV6GfhNhDUNyz4DvQxyjcSMOHX4ED9G0Lviw2mE34Ie3x300zegaSN_wA6TJjwl3MfR4XANe9BBdY4bc7D2s4LXqLfk1YaqUwr-m-Ay7D-i0Mz7Bx8O9QL9_fH9c_ixu765vlovboslfGItacMFLwgllHBTwlinb2paZTpWiIsIyIiSQsqGWlFbKShIL1squ5UAzXV6gy33vJoa_E6RR9y414L0ZIExJV7WqGCUig2wPNjGkFKHTm-h6E3eaEv1qXWfrOuvWVP-3nkOfD-2T7aE9Rg6aM_DlAJjUGN9FMzQuHblKSprnj9zardZbF0Gn3nifa6nebrf72Tz4Ao35mfw
CODEN AAJRDX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1053_j_sult_2007_01_007
crossref_primary_10_1089_tmj_2016_0149
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2006_02_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvs_2011_11_121
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_06_1310
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_007_9018_7
crossref_primary_10_3389_fradi_2023_1180699
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_20_23007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2009_10_014
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_009_9222_8
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_12112066
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2433070350
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2443070165
crossref_primary_10_3389_fradi_2022_866643
crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMhle0707298
crossref_primary_10_12968_hmed_2011_72_5_271
crossref_primary_10_1089_tmj_2014_0123
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_06_0344
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2009_10_014
crossref_primary_10_1258_135763306778393090
crossref_primary_10_1308_rcsbull_2018_296
crossref_primary_10_1177_1747493016672086
crossref_primary_10_1109_TITB_2006_888236
crossref_primary_10_1002_jcu_21974
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2023_02_036
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2010_08_027
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0098_1672_08_70403_X
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2442070676
Cites_doi 10.1258/1357633981931245
10.2214/ajr.162.2.8310907
10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.589
10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760307
10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596832
10.1148/radiol.2311030307
10.1007/BF03168390
10.2214/ajr.178.2.1780291
10.1016/S0001-2998(98)80004-4
10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810341
10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577494
10.2214/ajr.157.6.1950886
10.1097/01.blo.0000126751.94460.8d
10.2214/ajr.182.2.1820301
10.1089/tmj.1.1997.3.215
10.1148/radiology.193.3.7972796
10.1016/j.jacr.2003.12.043
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2005 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS
DBID IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.2214/ajr.185.1.01850024
DatabaseName Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1546-3141
EndPage 35
ExternalDocumentID 10_2214_ajr_185_1_01850024
15972394
16881210
www185_1_24
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
GroupedDBID -
1KJ
23M
2WC
34G
39C
3O-
53G
55
5GY
5RE
AAWTL
ABFLS
ABOCM
ADACO
ADBBV
AENEX
AFFNX
AJYGW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GJ
GX1
H13
L7B
LSO
O0-
P2P
SJN
TRR
UDS
VH1
W2D
WH7
WOQ
X7M
ZA5
ZXP
---
-DD
.55
.GJ
08R
1CY
AAEJM
AAUGY
ACRZS
AI.
AJJEV
IQODW
J5H
MJL
TR2
TWZ
W8F
YJK
YQI
YQJ
ZGI
ZVN
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-754543040124e9e4d29bdbd2af935605b2058e03c1b03b88680bebb8fd4e14d23
ISSN 0361-803X
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 21:59:54 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 01:29:01 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:43:12 EDT 2024
Sun Oct 22 16:09:11 EDT 2023
Tue Nov 10 19:20:16 EST 2020
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Sonography
Radiography
Nuclear medicine
Survey
Radiodiagnosis
Radiology
Medical imagery
Computerized axial tomography
Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c361t-754543040124e9e4d29bdbd2af935605b2058e03c1b03b88680bebb8fd4e14d23
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 15972394
PQID 67962105
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_67962105
crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_185_1_01850024
pubmed_primary_15972394
pascalfrancis_primary_16881210
highwire_smallpub1_www185_1_24
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2005-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2005
  text: 2005-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Leesburg, VA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Leesburg, VA
– name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of roentgenology (1976)
PublicationTitleAlternate AJR Am J Roentgenol
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher Am Roentgen Ray Soc
American Roentgen Ray Society
Publisher_xml – name: Am Roentgen Ray Soc
– name: American Roentgen Ray Society
References REF9
REF7
REF8
REF5
REF6
REF3
REF4
REF11
REF22
REF10
REF21
REF20
REF15
REF25
REF24
REF12
REF1
atypb1
REF19
REF18
REF17
atypb2
REF16
References_xml – ident: REF1
  doi: 10.1258/1357633981931245
– ident: REF6
– ident: atypb2
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.2.8310907
– ident: REF24
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.589
– ident: REF5
– ident: REF3
– ident: REF22
– ident: REF7
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760307
– ident: REF9
– ident: REF15
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596832
– ident: REF19
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2311030307
– ident: REF18
  doi: 10.1007/BF03168390
– ident: REF17
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.2.1780291
– ident: REF25
  doi: 10.1016/S0001-2998(98)80004-4
– ident: REF8
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810341
– ident: REF11
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577494
– ident: atypb1
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.157.6.1950886
– ident: REF21
  doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000126751.94460.8d
– ident: REF20
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.182.2.1820301
– ident: REF16
  doi: 10.1089/tmj.1.1997.3.215
– ident: REF10
– ident: REF12
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.3.7972796
– ident: REF4
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2003.12.043
SSID ssj0007897
Score 1.9822171
Snippet This article presents a comprehensive portrait of the characteristics of teleradiology systems of radiology practices as of 1999. Our purposes are to help...
OBJECTIVEThis article presents a comprehensive portrait of the characteristics of teleradiology systems of radiology practices as of 1999. Our purposes are to...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
pascalfrancis
highwire
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 24
SubjectTerms Biological and medical sciences
Diagnostic Imaging - statistics & numerical data
Group Practice
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medical sciences
Private Practice
Radiology Information Systems
Radionuclide Imaging
Referral and Consultation
Regression Analysis
Teleradiology - utilization
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Ultrasonography
United States
Title A Comprehensive Portrait of Teleradiology in Radiology Practices: Results from the American College of Radiology's 1999 Survey
URI http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/185/1/24
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15972394
https://search.proquest.com/docview/67962105
Volume 185
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9QwFLaGIiEuiJ1hKT4gcUAZYsdJHG6jAipLOUArlVNkJ44omslUWRiJA7-Hn8mzY2fRtBJwyUwS24n8ffF7tt-C0DNJiCR5wTyaicQDjZh6SSSkJ3jM_TgT0jc5I48-RYcn7P1peDqb_R5ZLbWNXGQ_L_Qr-R9U4Rrgqr1k_wHZvlG4AP8BXzgCwnD8K4yXxiK8Ut-sFbrWpStxZjb3G5AnlchtjCXttdKfOM8oYw0H0-121dQ7fibleE3hs6trlvd1TAEYcaof0z3hvuIoGkW1AaGm48CaB-ugUKCYjFYfPorKunwZ4_ohB_QBzI_N6vRXUa_h7Qed1bg5GIlpLH4HB7UvrTY9KyebAtb3wi1rhL0J7ODORUB8mmTBo6E63OGkHXjZRfKAUsK0sPteLaDqgix8-NFqybgw9PX52jAEVLtYp4ofZGNvsehuXUFXaZyE2nj09bsPvcyPuUnj0790556lH_9y9-EmFVTX3FQbchGqtYGuqOEbLbrkKpfPfowWdHwT3bDTF7zsuHgLzVR5G107sgYad9CvJZ5QEjtK4k2BJ5TEZyUeTnpKvsKWkFgTEgMhseMVtoTUTfWEfF5jTUfc0fEuOnn75vjg0LMpPrwMuqrxYlDgWQCCBNRMlSiW00TmMqeiSALQxUNJ_ZArP8iI9APJecR9qaTkRc4UgdLBPbRXbkr1AGFZxCBOsiyTPmOBjBKlOM1yvwAFmGUxnaMXrqvT8y6SSwozYI1RChilAE5KUofRHO07NNJ6LVYr6HWSbrfbrpgpMMFoaDPiXEflm6OnDrQUhmy9DydKtWnrVC_dQoFwju53WA51LS0eXnrnEbo-fC2P0V5TteoJqMWN3DeM_AMvY7Yz
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,27955,27956
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+comprehensive+portrait+of+teleradiology+in+radiology+practices%3A+results+from+the+American+College+of+Radiology%27s+1999+Survey&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=Larson%2C+David+B&rft.au=Cypel%2C+Yasmin+S&rft.au=Forman%2C+Howard+P&rft.au=Sunshine%2C+Jonathan+H&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.volume=185&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2Fajr.185.1.01850024&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F15972394&rft.externalDocID=15972394
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon