Long repetition time experiments for measurement of concentrations in systems with chemical exchange and undergoing temporal variation–comparison of methods with and without correction for saturation

The purpose of this paper is to compare two methods for quantifying metabolite concentrations using the one-pulse experiment for a sample undergoing chemical exchange and subject to an intervention or other temporal variation. The methods, LATR-C (Long Acquisition TR (interpulse delay); Corrected fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance (1997) Vol. 160; no. 2; pp. 126 - 130
Main Authors Galbán, Craig J, Spencer, Richard G.S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.02.2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this paper is to compare two methods for quantifying metabolite concentrations using the one-pulse experiment for a sample undergoing chemical exchange and subject to an intervention or other temporal variation. The methods, LATR-C (Long Acquisition TR (interpulse delay); Corrected for partial saturation) and LATR-NC (Long Acquisition TR; Not Corrected), are compared in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, SNR, per unit time and quantitation errors. Parameters relevant to the isolated perfused rat heart are used as a specific application, although the results are general. We assume throughout that spin–lattice relaxation times, T 1, do not change. For a given flip angle, θ, TR’s are calculated which result in maximal SNR per unit time under 10%, 5%, and 1% constraints on quantitation errors. Additional simulations were performed to demonstrate explicitly the dependence of the quantitation errors on TR for a fixed θ. We find (i) if the allowed error is large, and when both metabolite concentrations and rate constants vary, LATR-C permits use of shorter TR, and hence yields greater SNR per unit time, than LATR-NC; (ii) for small allowed error, the two methods give similar TR’s and SNR per unit time, so that the simpler LATR-NC experiment may be preferred; (iii) large values of θ result in similar constrained TR’s and hence SNR per unit time for the two methods; (iv) the ratio of concentrations of metabolites with similar T 1 exhibit similar errors for the two methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1090-7807
1096-0856
DOI:10.1016/S1090-7807(02)00104-0