Mobile telephone use effects on peripheral audiovestibular function: A case-control study

• Published in: Bioelectromagnetics Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 108 - 117
• Main Authors: Bamiou, Doris-Eva, Ceranic, Borka, Cox, Robin, Watt, Hilary, Chadwick, Philip, Luxon, Linda M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.02.2008
• Subjects: Adult; Body Burden; Case-Control Studies; Cell Phone; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; Double-Blind Method; electrical hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; mobile telephone; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous - physiology; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous - radiation effects; Radiation Dosage; Radio Waves; Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - physiology; Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - radiation effects; Relative Biological Effectiveness; symptoms; transient evoked otoacoustic emissions; vestibulo-ocular reflex
• ISSN: 0197-8462; 1521-186X; 1521-186X
• DOI: 10.1002/bem.20369

Low level radio‐frequency (RF) signals may produce disorientation, headache and nausea. This double blind study tested nine case‐subjects, who complained of various symptoms after prolonged mobile telephone use and 21 control subjects. Each subject underwent a series of trials, in which a dummy mobile telephone exposure system was held to each ear for 30 min in (a) pulsed, (b) continuous RF emission or, (c) no emission test modes. In the active pulsed and continuous modes the same mean power as the output of a typical handset was delivered at a carrier frequency of 882 MHz and at a maximum specific absorption rate (SAR) value of 1.3 W kg−1 (± 30%). In Experiment I (auditory), transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), which assess the outer hair cells in the inner ear, were conducted. In Experiment II (vestibular) the vestibulo‐ocular reflex was recorded by video‐oculography (VOG), at baseline and immediately post exposure. There were no significant TEOAE changes from baseline to post‐exposure recording for any of the exposures and no significant differences in the TEOAEs' change from baseline to post exposure between cases and controls. The VOG did not identify any effect of the exposure on the vestibular end organ in either cases or controls. In conclusion, 30 min exposure to mobile phone RF did not show any immediate effects on vestibulocochlear function as measured by TEOAE and the VOR. Bioelectromagnetics 29:108–117, 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.