Isolated lung perfusion with melphalan: Pharmacokinetics and toxicity in a pig model

Background In patients with unresectable lung cancer or pulmonary metastases, isolated lung perfusion (ILP) has been described as an alternative method to deliver high‐dose chemotherapy to the lungs, thereby minimizing systemic toxicity. Pharmacokinetics of ILP have not been extensively investigated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of surgical oncology Vol. 93; no. 5; pp. 410 - 416
Main Authors van der Elst, A., Oosterling, S.J., Paul, M.A., Vonk, A.M.A., Sparidans, R.W., van der Sijp, J.R.M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.04.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background In patients with unresectable lung cancer or pulmonary metastases, isolated lung perfusion (ILP) has been described as an alternative method to deliver high‐dose chemotherapy to the lungs, thereby minimizing systemic toxicity. Pharmacokinetics of ILP have not been extensively investigated. Therefore, we studied the feasibility of ILP with melphalan in a pig model with emphasis on pharmacokinetics and acute lung damage. Methods Five pigs underwent ILP with melphalan. Blood and tissue samples were obtained for determination of melphalan levels. Tissue biopsies were taken for microscopic evaluation of lung damage. Results During ILP, no hemodynamic effects of importance were noted. No systemic leakage of melphalan was observed in any of the animals. Compared with normal lung tissue, microscopic examination of lung tissue after perfusion without melphalan showed pulmonary edema. Directly after melphalan perfusion additional hemorrhagic areas were seen; however, electron microscopy displayed no irreversible endothelial damage. Conclusion This study on pigs proved to be a well reproducible model for ILP with melphalan. Pharmacokinetics show a safety profile with no systemic toxicity, which could justify further patient studies, necessary to determine its effect on pulmonary metastases in humans, especially in case of adjuvant therapy after surgical resection or in unresectable disease. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006;93:410–416. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JSO20498
istex:2800B8172D76DF4AC5D8FD4AE1E9176465F63095
ark:/67375/WNG-BCZZDH3S-X
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.20498