Clinical trial of pantomography for the evaluation of mandibular trauma

A trial study was conducted comparing the standard “four view” mandibular series and pantomography for the evaluation of mandibular trauma. During the six-month trial period a series of 17 patients with a total of 24 mandibular fractures was compiled. The pantomographs were more easily interpreted t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of emergency medicine Vol. 9; no. 8; pp. 415 - 418
Main Authors Johnston, Charles C., Doris, Peter E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Mosby, Inc 01.08.1980
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A trial study was conducted comparing the standard “four view” mandibular series and pantomography for the evaluation of mandibular trauma. During the six-month trial period a series of 17 patients with a total of 24 mandibular fractures was compiled. The pantomographs were more easily interpreted than the standard views because overlapping structures were blurred and spatial orientation was clear. In eight of the 17 patients the fractures were more clearly visualized by pantomography. Because the entire mandible was seen so well on the pantomographs, no special views were required. Eleven patients had single fractures, which are in fact quite common.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0196-0644
1097-6760
DOI:10.1016/S0196-0644(80)80154-5