Switches between biologics in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis: results from the French cohort PSOBIOTEQ

Background Biologics are the cornerstone of treatment of patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis and switches between biologics are frequently needed to maintain clinical improvement over time. Objectives The main purpose of this study was to describe precisely switches between biologics a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Vol. 36; no. 11; pp. 2101 - 2112
Main Authors Curmin, R., Guillo, S., De Rycke, Y., Bachelez, H., Beylot‐Barry, M., Beneton, N., Chosidow, O., Dupuy, A., Joly, P., Jullien, D., Richard, M.A., Viguier, M., Sbidian, E., Paul, C., Mahé, E., Tubach, F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley 01.11.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Biologics are the cornerstone of treatment of patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis and switches between biologics are frequently needed to maintain clinical improvement over time. Objectives The main purpose of this study was to describe precisely switches between biologics and how their pattern changed over time with the recent availability of new biologic agents. Methods We included patients receiving a first biologic agent in the Psobioteq multicenter cohort of adults with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis receiving systemic treatment. We described switches between biologics with chronograms, Sankey and Sunburst diagrams, assessed cumulative incidence of first switch by competing risks survival analysis and reasons for switching. We assessed the factors associated with the type of switch (intra‐class – i.e. within the same therapeutic class ‐ vs. inter‐class) in patients switching from a TNF‐alpha inhibitor using multivariate logistic regression. Results A total of 2153 patients was included. The cumulative incidence of switches from first biologic was 34% at 3 years. Adalimumab and ustekinumab were the most prescribed biologic agents as first and second lines of treatment. The main reason for switching was loss of efficacy (72%), followed by adverse events (11%). Patients receiving a TNF‐alpha inhibitor before 2016 mostly switched to ustekinumab, whereas those switching in 2016 or after mostly switched to an IL‐17 inhibitor. Patients switching from a first‐line TNF‐alpha inhibitor before 2016 were more likely to switch to another TNF‐alpha inhibitor compared with patients switching since 2018. Patients switching from etanercept were more likely to receive another TNF‐alpha inhibitor rather than another therapeutic class of bDMARD compared with patients switching from adalimumab. Conclusion This study described the switching patterns of biologic treatments and showed how they changed over time, due to the availability of the new biologic agents primarily IL‐17 inhibitors.
Bibliography:Conflicts of interest
Funding sources
R. Curmin, Y. De Rycke, S. Guillo, O. Chosidow and E. Sbidian have no conflicts of interest to disclose. H. Bachelez has undertaken activities as a paid consultant, advisor or speaker for Abbvie, Almirall, Anaptysbio, Biocad, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dermavant, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Novartis and UCB. He has also received grant funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer. M. Beylot‐Barry offers a consultancy service and is an investigator for Abbvie, Amgen, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Lilly and Novartis; N. Beneton has undertaken activities as a paid consultant, advisor or speaker for Abbvie, Almirall, Janssen, Lilly and Novartis. A. Dupuy has undertaken activities as a paid consultant for Sanofi. P. Joly is a consultant for Abbvie, Akari, Amgen, Argenx, Astra Zeneca, Chugai, GSK, Janssen, Kezar Life Science, Lilly, Novartis, Principabio, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Servier, Thermofisher and UCB. D. Jullien is a consultant for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen‐Cilag, Lilly, MEDAC, Novartis and UCB. M.A. Richard is a consultant for Pfizer, Leo Pharma, Janssen, Galderma, AbbVie, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Merck and BMS. M. Viguier has undertaken activities as a paid consultant, advisor or speaker for Abbvie, Almirall, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, Leo Pharma, Medac, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Lilly. C. Paul has been an investigator and consultant for Almirall, AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB. E. Mahe is a consultant for Abbvie, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Lilly and Novartis, has also been an investigator for Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis, and has received speaker remuneration from Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly, Leo Pharma and Novartis. F. Tubach is head of the Pharmacoepidemiology Centre of the AP‐HP and of the Clinical Research Unit of Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hospitals; both these structures have received unrestricted research funding, grants and consultancy fees from a large number of pharmaceutical companies that have contributed indiscriminately to the salaries of its employees. F. Tubach did not receive any personal remuneration from these companies.
The PsoBioTeq cohort study is supported by unrestricted research grants from the French Ministry of Health (PHRC AOM 09195), the French National Drug and Healthcare Products Safety Agency (ANSM) and private funders (Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD France, Lilly France, Novartis Pharma, Celgene, Amgen and Leo Pharma). None of the private funders had any role in the design of this ancillary study, data management, analysis and interpretation of the data, preparation or approval of this manuscript, or the decision to submit it for publication. They received the manuscript for information purposes before submission. The study was sponsored by the Direction of Clinical Research and Innovation (DRCI, AP‐HP, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris). The PsoBioTeq cohort was set up under the auspices of the French Society of Dermatology (SFD) and its Psoriasis Research Group. R Curmin was supported by a grant from Institut Pierre Louis D'Epidemiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP, INSERM and Sorbonne Université).
ISSN:0926-9959
1468-3083
DOI:10.1111/jdv.18409