A review of applicant faking in selection interviews

Interviews are commonly used for selection but research on interview faking only gained momentum relatively recently. We review both theoretical and empirical work on prevalence, antecedents, processes, and effects of interview faking. Most applicants fake at least to some degree. Personality (e.g.,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of selection and assessment Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 123 - 142
Main Authors Melchers, Klaus G, Roulin, Nicolas, Buehl, Anne‐Kathrin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, NJ Wiley 01.06.2020
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1468-2389
0965-075X
1468-2389
DOI10.1111/ijsa.12280

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Interviews are commonly used for selection but research on interview faking only gained momentum relatively recently. We review both theoretical and empirical work on prevalence, antecedents, processes, and effects of interview faking. Most applicants fake at least to some degree. Personality (e.g., Conscientiousness, Honesty-humility, the Dark Triad) and attitudes toward faking substantially correlate with faking behaviors. Research concerning applicants' ability, interview structure components, or contextual factors is limited. Furthermore, the impact of faking on interview ratings is mixed and effects on criterion-related validity are not consistently negative. Finally, the detection of faking seems hardly possible and there are limited options available to reduce interview faking. Throughout our review, we describe important gaps and derive suggestions and propositions for future research.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1468-2389
0965-075X
1468-2389
DOI:10.1111/ijsa.12280