Attention to baseline: does orienting visuospatial attention really facilitate target detection?

Standard protocols testing the orientation of visuospatial attention usually present spatial cues before targets and compare valid-cue trials with invalid-cue trials. The valid/invalid contrast results in a relative behavioral or physiological difference that is generally interpreted as a benefit of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurophysiology Vol. 106; no. 2; pp. 809 - 816
Main Authors Albares, Marion, Criaud, Marion, Wardak, Claire, Nguyen, Song Chi Trung, Ben Hamed, Suliann, Boulinguez, Philippe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Physiological Society 01.08.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-3077
1522-1598
1522-1598
DOI10.1152/jn.00206.2011

Cover

Abstract Standard protocols testing the orientation of visuospatial attention usually present spatial cues before targets and compare valid-cue trials with invalid-cue trials. The valid/invalid contrast results in a relative behavioral or physiological difference that is generally interpreted as a benefit of attention orientation. However, growing evidence suggests that inhibitory control of response is closely involved in this kind of protocol that requires the subjects to withhold automatic responses to cues, probably biasing behavioral and physiological baselines. Here, we used two experiments to disentangle the inhibitory control of automatic responses from orienting of visuospatial attention in a saccadic reaction time task in humans, a variant of the classical cue-target detection task and a sustained visuospatial attentional task. Surprisingly, when referring to a simple target detection task in which there is no need to refrain from reacting to avoid inappropriate responses, we found no consistent evidence of facilitation of target detection at the attended location. Instead, we observed a cost at the unattended location. Departing from the classical view, our results suggest that reaction time measures of visuospatial attention probably relie on the attenuation of elementary processes involved in visual target detection and saccade initiation away from the attended location rather than on facilitation at the attended location. This highlights the need to use proper control conditions in experimental designs to disambiguate relative from absolute cueing benefits on target detection reaction times, both in psychophysical and neurophysiological studies.
AbstractList Standard protocols testing the orientation of visuospatial attention usually present spatial cues before targets and compare valid-cue trials with invalid-cue trials. The valid/invalid contrast results in a relative behavioral or physiological difference that is generally interpreted as a benefit of attention orientation. However, growing evidence suggests that inhibitory control of response is closely involved in this kind of protocol that requires the subjects to withhold automatic responses to cues, probably biasing behavioral and physiological baselines. Here, we used two experiments to disentangle the inhibitory control of automatic responses from orienting of visuospatial attention in a saccadic reaction time task in humans, a variant of the classical cue-target detection task and a sustained visuospatial attentional task. Surprisingly, when referring to a simple target detection task in which there is no need to refrain from reacting to avoid inappropriate responses, we found no consistent evidence of facilitation of target detection at the attended location. Instead, we observed a cost at the unattended location. Departing from the classical view, our results suggest that reaction time measures of visuospatial attention probably relie on the attenuation of elementary processes involved in visual target detection and saccade initiation away from the attended location rather than on facilitation at the attended location. This highlights the need to use proper control conditions in experimental designs to disambiguate relative from absolute cueing benefits on target detection reaction times, both in psychophysical and neurophysiological studies.
Standard protocols testing the orientation of visuospatial attention usually present spatial cues before targets and compare valid-cue trials with invalid-cue trials. The valid/invalid contrast results in a relative behavioral or physiological difference that is generally interpreted as a benefit of attention orientation. However, growing evidence suggests that inhibitory control of response is closely involved in this kind of protocol that requires the subjects to withhold automatic responses to cues, probably biasing behavioral and physiological baselines. Here, we used two experiments to disentangle the inhibitory control of automatic responses from orienting of visuospatial attention in a saccadic reaction time task in humans, a variant of the classical cue-target detection task and a sustained visuospatial attentional task. Surprisingly, when referring to a simple target detection task in which there is no need to refrain from reacting to avoid inappropriate responses, we found no consistent evidence of facilitation of target detection at the attended location. Instead, we observed a cost at the unattended location. Departing from the classical view, our results suggest that reaction time measures of visuospatial attention probably relie on the attenuation of elementary processes involved in visual target detection and saccade initiation away from the attended location rather than on facilitation at the attended location. This highlights the need to use proper control conditions in experimental designs to disambiguate relative from absolute cueing benefits on target detection reaction times, both in psychophysical and neurophysiological studies.Standard protocols testing the orientation of visuospatial attention usually present spatial cues before targets and compare valid-cue trials with invalid-cue trials. The valid/invalid contrast results in a relative behavioral or physiological difference that is generally interpreted as a benefit of attention orientation. However, growing evidence suggests that inhibitory control of response is closely involved in this kind of protocol that requires the subjects to withhold automatic responses to cues, probably biasing behavioral and physiological baselines. Here, we used two experiments to disentangle the inhibitory control of automatic responses from orienting of visuospatial attention in a saccadic reaction time task in humans, a variant of the classical cue-target detection task and a sustained visuospatial attentional task. Surprisingly, when referring to a simple target detection task in which there is no need to refrain from reacting to avoid inappropriate responses, we found no consistent evidence of facilitation of target detection at the attended location. Instead, we observed a cost at the unattended location. Departing from the classical view, our results suggest that reaction time measures of visuospatial attention probably relie on the attenuation of elementary processes involved in visual target detection and saccade initiation away from the attended location rather than on facilitation at the attended location. This highlights the need to use proper control conditions in experimental designs to disambiguate relative from absolute cueing benefits on target detection reaction times, both in psychophysical and neurophysiological studies.
Author Wardak, Claire
Criaud, Marion
Nguyen, Song Chi Trung
Albares, Marion
Ben Hamed, Suliann
Boulinguez, Philippe
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Marion
  surname: Albares
  fullname: Albares, Marion
  organization: Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon; and
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Marion
  surname: Criaud
  fullname: Criaud, Marion
  organization: Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon; and, Département de Psychologie Cognitive Expérimentale et Neuropsychologie, Université Louis Lumière Lyon 2, Lyro, France
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Claire
  surname: Wardak
  fullname: Wardak, Claire
  organization: Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon; and
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Song Chi Trung
  surname: Nguyen
  fullname: Nguyen, Song Chi Trung
  organization: Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon; and
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Suliann
  surname: Ben Hamed
  fullname: Ben Hamed, Suliann
  organization: Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon; and
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Philippe
  surname: Boulinguez
  fullname: Boulinguez, Philippe
  organization: Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon; and
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21613585$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-04972524$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNqF0cGKFDEQBuAgK-7s6tGr5CYeekzSnU7aiwyLusKAFz3H6nT1miGTjElmYd_etLPOQRBPgaqvQvHXFbkIMSAhLzlbcy7F211YMyZYvxaM8ydkVWui4XLQF2RVG6JpmVKX5CrnHWNMSSaekUvBe95KLVfk-6YUDMXFQEukI2T0LuA7OkXMNCa39MIdvXf5GPMBigNP4TySELx_oDNY512BgrRAusNCJyxoF_L-OXk6g8_44vG9Jt8-fvh6c9tsv3z6fLPZNrYuUhrdjpx1bJz1IBBV10o5zYPQCFwLkHaaQOGs-lH3IOwMMKpB98IOwNhsuWqvyZvTvz_Am0Nye0gPJoIzt5utWWqsG5SQorvn1b4-2UOKP4-Yi9m7bNF7CBiP2QxM8V7yjv1Xat3WfEXXVfnqUR7HPU7nFf5EXUFzAjbFnBPOZ8KZWU5pdsH8PqVZTll9-5e3S8Q105LA-X9M_QJUp6G-
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1515_revneuro_2014_0078
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2020_103020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropharm_2019_03_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneumeth_2017_04_008
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnsys_2014_00144
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_018_01141_7
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci11050560
crossref_primary_10_1111_ejn_15044
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1460_9568_2012_08264_x
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_020_14649_7
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0172485
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brs_2014_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ad5109
crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2021_3115490
crossref_primary_10_4236_health_2015_72021
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinph_2016_11_001
Cites_doi 10.1152/jn.1997.77.1.24
10.3758/PBR.15.6.1209
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5722-09.2010
10.1152/jn.00221.2009
10.1073/pnas.1001925107
10.1152/jn.00435.2004
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3759-07.2007
10.1038/nn1194
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-09-03561.2003
10.1177/1073858408314435
10.1037/h0061076
10.1162/089892905774589235
10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.032
10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.020
10.1162/089892905775008634
10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.167
10.1126/science.4023713
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0275-08.2008
10.1016/0028-3932(87)90043-1
10.1007/s002210100718
10.1152/jn.01198.2007
10.2466/pms.1991.72.2.617
10.1002/ana.21795
10.1080/00335558008248231
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2669-10.2010
10.1364/JOSA.46.001069
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.041
10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152823
10.1093/cercor/bhp215
10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00123-1
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.013
10.7551/mitpress/1477.003.0017
10.1152/jn.00717.2009
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6164-08.2009
10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
10.3109/00207459408986083
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4437-09.2010
10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1141-09.2009
10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131039
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright_xml – notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7TK
1XC
DOI 10.1152/jn.00206.2011
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Neurosciences Abstracts
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
Neurosciences Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

Neurosciences Abstracts
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1522-1598
EndPage 816
ExternalDocumentID oai_HAL_hal_04972524v1
21613585
10_1152_jn_00206_2011
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
.55
.GJ
0VX
18M
1CY
1Z7
29L
2WC
39C
3O-
4.4
41~
53G
5GY
5VS
8M5
AAYXX
ABCQX
ABHWK
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABKWE
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACNCT
ADBBV
ADFNX
ADHGD
ADIYS
AENEX
AETEA
AFFNX
AFOSN
AI.
AIZAD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BKKCC
BTFSW
C1A
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
H13
H~9
ITBOX
KQ8
L7B
MVM
NEJ
OHT
OK1
P2P
RAP
RHI
RPL
RPRKH
SJN
TR2
UHB
UPT
UQL
VH1
W8F
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
XJT
XOL
XSW
YBH
YQT
YSK
ZGI
ZXP
ZY4
ABTAH
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
FRP
GX1
NPM
RHF
VXZ
7X8
7TK
1XC
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-83b1040bf892ee74355df928ea182a5cdda7ef76b86a2cfaab79862c9a00fc173
ISSN 0022-3077
1522-1598
IngestDate Sat Jul 26 06:30:54 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 14:38:56 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 10:22:45 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:48:15 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:08:56 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:48 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
License Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c358t-83b1040bf892ee74355df928ea182a5cdda7ef76b86a2cfaab79862c9a00fc173
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-1510-7284
PMID 21613585
PQID 883307244
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04972524v1
proquest_miscellaneous_907165140
proquest_miscellaneous_883307244
pubmed_primary_21613585
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00206_2011
crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_jn_00206_2011
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2011-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2011
  text: 2011-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of neurophysiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurophysiol
PublicationYear 2011
Publisher American Physiological Society
Publisher_xml – name: American Physiological Society
References B20
B42
B21
B22
B23
B24
B25
B26
B27
B28
B29
Allport A (B1) 1993
B30
B31
B10
B32
B11
B33
B12
B34
B13
B35
B14
B36
B15
B37
B16
B38
B17
B39
B18
B2
B3
B4
B5
Jonides J (B19) 1981
B6
B7
B8
B9
B40
B41
References_xml – ident: B23
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.1.24
– ident: B15
  doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1209
– ident: B14
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5722-09.2010
– ident: B36
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00221.2009
– ident: B9
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001925107
– ident: B34
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00435.2004
– ident: B40
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3759-07.2007
– ident: B10
  doi: 10.1038/nn1194
– ident: B28
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-09-03561.2003
– ident: B37
  doi: 10.1177/1073858408314435
– ident: B27
  doi: 10.1037/h0061076
– ident: B16
  doi: 10.1162/089892905774589235
– ident: B17
  doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.032
– ident: B20
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315
– ident: B12
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.020
– ident: B42
  doi: 10.1162/089892905775008634
– ident: B6
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.167
– ident: B26
  doi: 10.1126/science.4023713
– ident: B38
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0275-08.2008
– ident: B41
  doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90043-1
– ident: B7
  doi: 10.1007/s002210100718
– ident: B8
  doi: 10.1152/jn.01198.2007
– ident: B4
  doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.72.2.617
– ident: B3
  doi: 10.1002/ana.21795
– ident: B29
  doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231
– ident: B11
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2669-10.2010
– ident: B25
  doi: 10.1364/JOSA.46.001069
– ident: B18
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.041
– ident: B5
  doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152823
– ident: B13
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp215
– ident: B24
  doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00123-1
– ident: B35
  doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.013
– start-page: 183
  volume-title: Attention and Performance XIV
  year: 1993
  ident: B1
  doi: 10.7551/mitpress/1477.003.0017
– ident: B2
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00717.2009
– ident: B22
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6164-08.2009
– ident: B30
  doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
– start-page: 187
  volume-title: Attention and Performance IX
  year: 1981
  ident: B19
– ident: B31
  doi: 10.3109/00207459408986083
– ident: B21
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4437-09.2010
– ident: B32
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
– ident: B39
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1141-09.2009
– ident: B33
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131039
SSID ssj0007502
Score 2.1213028
Snippet Standard protocols testing the orientation of visuospatial attention usually present spatial cues before targets and compare valid-cue trials with invalid-cue...
SourceID hal
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 809
SubjectTerms Adult
Attention - physiology
Female
Humans
Life Sciences
Male
Middle Aged
Neural Inhibition - physiology
Neurons and Cognition
Orientation - physiology
Photic Stimulation - methods
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Saccades - physiology
Space Perception - physiology
Title Attention to baseline: does orienting visuospatial attention really facilitate target detection?
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21613585
https://www.proquest.com/docview/883307244
https://www.proquest.com/docview/907165140
https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-04972524
Volume 106
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELe68cILAsbHNkAWQnspAc-JE4cXFFWbKigFRCv6FhzH2YdCMrXJpPLXc3Y-y6j4eIkq10lb36_nu_Pd7xB6ARZ0LDlhlpt4ynIEY1bEBLEk5wLe8m3H1tXIH6bueO68W7DFYJD0spbKInolf_y2ruR_pApjIFddJfsPkm0fCgPwGuQLV5AwXP9KxkFR1NmKYEHq_cjQhoKPH-eaS3ZpGFOzs-H1xarMVzp3WjMDtDeBvZima91yp6LqVsMqL3wYq8JkaGW_pP31rFfDg2nCIhtx-SCNdEFTXQXUO-MfwXKU8c3xr4BQYTTyKBW9TNzpWbmuNOIX3Q1pdH4xnC3LepuN-2HXOkrRqxogdcuWRvMStwcx2tOjnPj9Lbkqx7yp7Zlmj73MdFSMuIaPtdvWmqP86cfwdD6ZhLOTxWwH3aKeZ47z33_uWOXBaupY5eE7NlysjL7eePiG7bJzrjNnt7klxjyZ3UV3asngoALJPTRQ2X20F2SiyL-v8RH-1IpqD31rcYOLHDe4eYM1anCLGtxHDW5RgyvU4A41uEINblHz9gGan57MRmOr7rRhSZvxwuJ2BG45iRLuU6XAqGQsTnzKlQD3UzAZx8JTiedG3BVUJkJEng-usPQFIYk89uyHaDfLM_UYYZseK3gUt4X0HUGYcHliUx1sB53lJ2QfvWzWMJQ1Db3uhpKGxh1lNLzMQrPkoV7yfXTUTr-q-Fe2TXwOAmnnaNb0cTAJ9Rg4wR5l1LmGSbiRVwhqVJ-NiUzl5SrUPbeJB7bu9ik-WOMu-BfwEx5Vom4_jYLfBAvJDv588yG63f0_nqDdYlmqp2DXFtEzA8qfOFmm7w
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attention+to+baseline%3A+does+orienting+visuospatial+attention+really+facilitate+target+detection%3F&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Albares%2C+Marion&rft.au=Criaud%2C+Marion&rft.au=Wardak%2C+Claire&rft.au=Nguyen%2C+Song+Chi+Trung&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=809&rft.epage=816&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00206.2011&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon