Attention to baseline: does orienting visuospatial attention really facilitate target detection?
Standard protocols testing the orientation of visuospatial attention usually present spatial cues before targets and compare valid-cue trials with invalid-cue trials. The valid/invalid contrast results in a relative behavioral or physiological difference that is generally interpreted as a benefit of...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neurophysiology Vol. 106; no. 2; pp. 809 - 816 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Physiological Society
01.08.2011
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0022-3077 1522-1598 1522-1598 |
DOI | 10.1152/jn.00206.2011 |
Cover
Abstract | Standard protocols testing the orientation of visuospatial attention usually present spatial cues before targets and compare valid-cue trials with invalid-cue trials. The valid/invalid contrast results in a relative behavioral or physiological difference that is generally interpreted as a benefit of attention orientation. However, growing evidence suggests that inhibitory control of response is closely involved in this kind of protocol that requires the subjects to withhold automatic responses to cues, probably biasing behavioral and physiological baselines. Here, we used two experiments to disentangle the inhibitory control of automatic responses from orienting of visuospatial attention in a saccadic reaction time task in humans, a variant of the classical cue-target detection task and a sustained visuospatial attentional task. Surprisingly, when referring to a simple target detection task in which there is no need to refrain from reacting to avoid inappropriate responses, we found no consistent evidence of facilitation of target detection at the attended location. Instead, we observed a cost at the unattended location. Departing from the classical view, our results suggest that reaction time measures of visuospatial attention probably relie on the attenuation of elementary processes involved in visual target detection and saccade initiation away from the attended location rather than on facilitation at the attended location. This highlights the need to use proper control conditions in experimental designs to disambiguate relative from absolute cueing benefits on target detection reaction times, both in psychophysical and neurophysiological studies. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Standard protocols testing the orientation of visuospatial attention usually present spatial cues before targets and compare valid-cue trials with invalid-cue trials. The valid/invalid contrast results in a relative behavioral or physiological difference that is generally interpreted as a benefit of attention orientation. However, growing evidence suggests that inhibitory control of response is closely involved in this kind of protocol that requires the subjects to withhold automatic responses to cues, probably biasing behavioral and physiological baselines. Here, we used two experiments to disentangle the inhibitory control of automatic responses from orienting of visuospatial attention in a saccadic reaction time task in humans, a variant of the classical cue-target detection task and a sustained visuospatial attentional task. Surprisingly, when referring to a simple target detection task in which there is no need to refrain from reacting to avoid inappropriate responses, we found no consistent evidence of facilitation of target detection at the attended location. Instead, we observed a cost at the unattended location. Departing from the classical view, our results suggest that reaction time measures of visuospatial attention probably relie on the attenuation of elementary processes involved in visual target detection and saccade initiation away from the attended location rather than on facilitation at the attended location. This highlights the need to use proper control conditions in experimental designs to disambiguate relative from absolute cueing benefits on target detection reaction times, both in psychophysical and neurophysiological studies. Standard protocols testing the orientation of visuospatial attention usually present spatial cues before targets and compare valid-cue trials with invalid-cue trials. The valid/invalid contrast results in a relative behavioral or physiological difference that is generally interpreted as a benefit of attention orientation. However, growing evidence suggests that inhibitory control of response is closely involved in this kind of protocol that requires the subjects to withhold automatic responses to cues, probably biasing behavioral and physiological baselines. Here, we used two experiments to disentangle the inhibitory control of automatic responses from orienting of visuospatial attention in a saccadic reaction time task in humans, a variant of the classical cue-target detection task and a sustained visuospatial attentional task. Surprisingly, when referring to a simple target detection task in which there is no need to refrain from reacting to avoid inappropriate responses, we found no consistent evidence of facilitation of target detection at the attended location. Instead, we observed a cost at the unattended location. Departing from the classical view, our results suggest that reaction time measures of visuospatial attention probably relie on the attenuation of elementary processes involved in visual target detection and saccade initiation away from the attended location rather than on facilitation at the attended location. This highlights the need to use proper control conditions in experimental designs to disambiguate relative from absolute cueing benefits on target detection reaction times, both in psychophysical and neurophysiological studies.Standard protocols testing the orientation of visuospatial attention usually present spatial cues before targets and compare valid-cue trials with invalid-cue trials. The valid/invalid contrast results in a relative behavioral or physiological difference that is generally interpreted as a benefit of attention orientation. However, growing evidence suggests that inhibitory control of response is closely involved in this kind of protocol that requires the subjects to withhold automatic responses to cues, probably biasing behavioral and physiological baselines. Here, we used two experiments to disentangle the inhibitory control of automatic responses from orienting of visuospatial attention in a saccadic reaction time task in humans, a variant of the classical cue-target detection task and a sustained visuospatial attentional task. Surprisingly, when referring to a simple target detection task in which there is no need to refrain from reacting to avoid inappropriate responses, we found no consistent evidence of facilitation of target detection at the attended location. Instead, we observed a cost at the unattended location. Departing from the classical view, our results suggest that reaction time measures of visuospatial attention probably relie on the attenuation of elementary processes involved in visual target detection and saccade initiation away from the attended location rather than on facilitation at the attended location. This highlights the need to use proper control conditions in experimental designs to disambiguate relative from absolute cueing benefits on target detection reaction times, both in psychophysical and neurophysiological studies. |
Author | Wardak, Claire Criaud, Marion Nguyen, Song Chi Trung Albares, Marion Ben Hamed, Suliann Boulinguez, Philippe |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Marion surname: Albares fullname: Albares, Marion organization: Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon; and – sequence: 2 givenname: Marion surname: Criaud fullname: Criaud, Marion organization: Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon; and, Département de Psychologie Cognitive Expérimentale et Neuropsychologie, Université Louis Lumière Lyon 2, Lyro, France – sequence: 3 givenname: Claire surname: Wardak fullname: Wardak, Claire organization: Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon; and – sequence: 4 givenname: Song Chi Trung surname: Nguyen fullname: Nguyen, Song Chi Trung organization: Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon; and – sequence: 5 givenname: Suliann surname: Ben Hamed fullname: Ben Hamed, Suliann organization: Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon; and – sequence: 6 givenname: Philippe surname: Boulinguez fullname: Boulinguez, Philippe organization: Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon; and |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21613585$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-04972524$$DView record in HAL |
BookMark | eNqF0cGKFDEQBuAgK-7s6tGr5CYeekzSnU7aiwyLusKAFz3H6nT1miGTjElmYd_etLPOQRBPgaqvQvHXFbkIMSAhLzlbcy7F211YMyZYvxaM8ydkVWui4XLQF2RVG6JpmVKX5CrnHWNMSSaekUvBe95KLVfk-6YUDMXFQEukI2T0LuA7OkXMNCa39MIdvXf5GPMBigNP4TySELx_oDNY512BgrRAusNCJyxoF_L-OXk6g8_44vG9Jt8-fvh6c9tsv3z6fLPZNrYuUhrdjpx1bJz1IBBV10o5zYPQCFwLkHaaQOGs-lH3IOwMMKpB98IOwNhsuWqvyZvTvz_Am0Nye0gPJoIzt5utWWqsG5SQorvn1b4-2UOKP4-Yi9m7bNF7CBiP2QxM8V7yjv1Xat3WfEXXVfnqUR7HPU7nFf5EXUFzAjbFnBPOZ8KZWU5pdsH8PqVZTll9-5e3S8Q105LA-X9M_QJUp6G- |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1515_revneuro_2014_0078 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2020_103020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropharm_2019_03_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneumeth_2017_04_008 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnsys_2014_00144 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_018_01141_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci11050560 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejn_15044 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1460_9568_2012_08264_x crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_020_14649_7 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0172485 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brs_2014_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ad5109 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2021_3115490 crossref_primary_10_4236_health_2015_72021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinph_2016_11_001 |
Cites_doi | 10.1152/jn.1997.77.1.24 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1209 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5722-09.2010 10.1152/jn.00221.2009 10.1073/pnas.1001925107 10.1152/jn.00435.2004 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3759-07.2007 10.1038/nn1194 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-09-03561.2003 10.1177/1073858408314435 10.1037/h0061076 10.1162/089892905774589235 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.032 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.020 10.1162/089892905775008634 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.167 10.1126/science.4023713 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0275-08.2008 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90043-1 10.1007/s002210100718 10.1152/jn.01198.2007 10.2466/pms.1991.72.2.617 10.1002/ana.21795 10.1080/00335558008248231 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2669-10.2010 10.1364/JOSA.46.001069 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.041 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152823 10.1093/cercor/bhp215 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00123-1 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.013 10.7551/mitpress/1477.003.0017 10.1152/jn.00717.2009 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6164-08.2009 10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160 10.3109/00207459408986083 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4437-09.2010 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1141-09.2009 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131039 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7TK 1XC |
DOI | 10.1152/jn.00206.2011 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Neurosciences Abstracts Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic Neurosciences Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Neurosciences Abstracts CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1522-1598 |
EndPage | 816 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_HAL_hal_04972524v1 21613585 10_1152_jn_00206_2011 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X .55 .GJ 0VX 18M 1CY 1Z7 29L 2WC 39C 3O- 4.4 41~ 53G 5GY 5VS 8M5 AAYXX ABCQX ABHWK ABIVO ABJNI ABKWE ACGFO ACGFS ACNCT ADBBV ADFNX ADHGD ADIYS AENEX AETEA AFFNX AFOSN AI. AIZAD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BKKCC BTFSW C1A CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD EMOBN F5P H13 H~9 ITBOX KQ8 L7B MVM NEJ OHT OK1 P2P RAP RHI RPL RPRKH SJN TR2 UHB UPT UQL VH1 W8F WH7 WOQ WOW X7M XJT XOL XSW YBH YQT YSK ZGI ZXP ZY4 ABTAH CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF FRP GX1 NPM RHF VXZ 7X8 7TK 1XC |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-83b1040bf892ee74355df928ea182a5cdda7ef76b86a2cfaab79862c9a00fc173 |
ISSN | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
IngestDate | Sat Jul 26 06:30:54 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 14:38:56 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 10:22:45 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:48:15 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:08:56 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:48 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
License | Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c358t-83b1040bf892ee74355df928ea182a5cdda7ef76b86a2cfaab79862c9a00fc173 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-1510-7284 |
PMID | 21613585 |
PQID | 883307244 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04972524v1 proquest_miscellaneous_907165140 proquest_miscellaneous_883307244 pubmed_primary_21613585 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00206_2011 crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_jn_00206_2011 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2011-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2011 text: 2011-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of neurophysiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neurophysiol |
PublicationYear | 2011 |
Publisher | American Physiological Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Physiological Society |
References | B20 B42 B21 B22 B23 B24 B25 B26 B27 B28 B29 Allport A (B1) 1993 B30 B31 B10 B32 B11 B33 B12 B34 B13 B35 B14 B36 B15 B37 B16 B38 B17 B39 B18 B2 B3 B4 B5 Jonides J (B19) 1981 B6 B7 B8 B9 B40 B41 |
References_xml | – ident: B23 doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.1.24 – ident: B15 doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1209 – ident: B14 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5722-09.2010 – ident: B36 doi: 10.1152/jn.00221.2009 – ident: B9 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001925107 – ident: B34 doi: 10.1152/jn.00435.2004 – ident: B40 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3759-07.2007 – ident: B10 doi: 10.1038/nn1194 – ident: B28 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-09-03561.2003 – ident: B37 doi: 10.1177/1073858408314435 – ident: B27 doi: 10.1037/h0061076 – ident: B16 doi: 10.1162/089892905774589235 – ident: B17 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.032 – ident: B20 doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315 – ident: B12 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.020 – ident: B42 doi: 10.1162/089892905775008634 – ident: B6 doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.167 – ident: B26 doi: 10.1126/science.4023713 – ident: B38 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0275-08.2008 – ident: B41 doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90043-1 – ident: B7 doi: 10.1007/s002210100718 – ident: B8 doi: 10.1152/jn.01198.2007 – ident: B4 doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.72.2.617 – ident: B3 doi: 10.1002/ana.21795 – ident: B29 doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231 – ident: B11 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2669-10.2010 – ident: B25 doi: 10.1364/JOSA.46.001069 – ident: B18 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.041 – ident: B5 doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152823 – ident: B13 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp215 – ident: B24 doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00123-1 – ident: B35 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.013 – start-page: 183 volume-title: Attention and Performance XIV year: 1993 ident: B1 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/1477.003.0017 – ident: B2 doi: 10.1152/jn.00717.2009 – ident: B22 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6164-08.2009 – ident: B30 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160 – start-page: 187 volume-title: Attention and Performance IX year: 1981 ident: B19 – ident: B31 doi: 10.3109/00207459408986083 – ident: B21 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4437-09.2010 – ident: B32 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446 – ident: B39 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1141-09.2009 – ident: B33 doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131039 |
SSID | ssj0007502 |
Score | 2.1213028 |
Snippet | Standard protocols testing the orientation of visuospatial attention usually present spatial cues before targets and compare valid-cue trials with invalid-cue... |
SourceID | hal proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 809 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Attention - physiology Female Humans Life Sciences Male Middle Aged Neural Inhibition - physiology Neurons and Cognition Orientation - physiology Photic Stimulation - methods Psychomotor Performance - physiology Reaction Time - physiology Saccades - physiology Space Perception - physiology |
Title | Attention to baseline: does orienting visuospatial attention really facilitate target detection? |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21613585 https://www.proquest.com/docview/883307244 https://www.proquest.com/docview/907165140 https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-04972524 |
Volume | 106 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELe68cILAsbHNkAWQnspAc-JE4cXFFWbKigFRCv6FhzH2YdCMrXJpPLXc3Y-y6j4eIkq10lb36_nu_Pd7xB6ARZ0LDlhlpt4ynIEY1bEBLEk5wLe8m3H1tXIH6bueO68W7DFYJD0spbKInolf_y2ruR_pApjIFddJfsPkm0fCgPwGuQLV5AwXP9KxkFR1NmKYEHq_cjQhoKPH-eaS3ZpGFOzs-H1xarMVzp3WjMDtDeBvZima91yp6LqVsMqL3wYq8JkaGW_pP31rFfDg2nCIhtx-SCNdEFTXQXUO-MfwXKU8c3xr4BQYTTyKBW9TNzpWbmuNOIX3Q1pdH4xnC3LepuN-2HXOkrRqxogdcuWRvMStwcx2tOjnPj9Lbkqx7yp7Zlmj73MdFSMuIaPtdvWmqP86cfwdD6ZhLOTxWwH3aKeZ47z33_uWOXBaupY5eE7NlysjL7eePiG7bJzrjNnt7klxjyZ3UV3asngoALJPTRQ2X20F2SiyL-v8RH-1IpqD31rcYOLHDe4eYM1anCLGtxHDW5RgyvU4A41uEINblHz9gGan57MRmOr7rRhSZvxwuJ2BG45iRLuU6XAqGQsTnzKlQD3UzAZx8JTiedG3BVUJkJEng-usPQFIYk89uyHaDfLM_UYYZseK3gUt4X0HUGYcHliUx1sB53lJ2QfvWzWMJQ1Db3uhpKGxh1lNLzMQrPkoV7yfXTUTr-q-Fe2TXwOAmnnaNb0cTAJ9Rg4wR5l1LmGSbiRVwhqVJ-NiUzl5SrUPbeJB7bu9ik-WOMu-BfwEx5Vom4_jYLfBAvJDv588yG63f0_nqDdYlmqp2DXFtEzA8qfOFmm7w |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attention+to+baseline%3A+does+orienting+visuospatial+attention+really+facilitate+target+detection%3F&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Albares%2C+Marion&rft.au=Criaud%2C+Marion&rft.au=Wardak%2C+Claire&rft.au=Nguyen%2C+Song+Chi+Trung&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=809&rft.epage=816&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00206.2011&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |