Comparing EMG Pattern Recognition with and Without Hand and Wrist Movements

Electromyography (EMG) pattern recognition has been widely employed for prosthesis control. Several studies demonstrated that amputees had poorer performances of EMG pattern recognition when compared to able-bodied individuals. Several factors, such as the muscle weakness and atrophy of residual lim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of bionics engineering Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 700 - 708
Main Authors Pan, Lizhi, Liu, Kai, Zhu, Kun, Li, Jianmin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Springer Singapore 01.05.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Electromyography (EMG) pattern recognition has been widely employed for prosthesis control. Several studies demonstrated that amputees had poorer performances of EMG pattern recognition when compared to able-bodied individuals. Several factors, such as the muscle weakness and atrophy of residual limbs, the length of residual limbs, and the decrease of the affected side's motor cortex, had been studied to improve the performance of amputees. However, there was no study on the factor that the absence of joint movements for amputees. This study aimed to investigate whether the hand and wrist joint movements had effects on the EMG pattern recognition. Ten able-bodied subjects were tested for 11 hand and wrist gestures with two different gesture modalities: hand and wrist joints unconstrained (HAWJU) and constrained (HAWJC). Time-domain (TD) features and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) were employed to compare the classification performance of the two modalities. Compared to HAWJU, HAWJC significantly reduced the average Classification Accuracy (CA) across all subjects from 95.53 to 85.52%. The experimental results demonstrated that the hand and wrist joint movements had significant effects on EMG pattern recognition. The outcomes provided a new perspective to study the factors affecting EMG pattern recognition.
ISSN:1672-6529
2543-2141
DOI:10.1007/s42235-022-00171-7