Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms
To promote large‐scale science education reform, developers must create innovations that teachers can use to learn and enact new practices. As part of an urban systemic reform effort, science materials were designed to reflect desired reforms and to support teacher thinking by addressing necessary c...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of research in science teaching Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 283 - 312 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.03.2005
John Wiley & Sons, Inc Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To promote large‐scale science education reform, developers must create innovations that teachers can use to learn and enact new practices. As part of an urban systemic reform effort, science materials were designed to reflect desired reforms and to support teacher thinking by addressing necessary content, pedagogy, and pedagogical content knowledge for teachers. The goal of this research was to describe teachers' enactments in comparison to reform as instantiated in the materials. Four middle school teachers' initial enactment of an inquiry‐based science unit on force and motion were analyzed. Findings indicate two teachers' enactments were consistent with intentions and two teachers' enactments were not. However, enactment ratings for the first two were less reflective of curriculum intent when challenges were greatest, such as when teachers attempted to present challenging science ideas, respond to students' ideas, structure investigations, guide small‐group discussions, or make adaptations. Overall, findings suggest that purposefully using materials with detailed lesson descriptions and specific, consistent supports for teacher thinking can help teachers with enactment. However, materials alone are not sufficient; reform efforts must include professional development and efforts to create systemic change in context and policy to support teacher learning and classroom enactment. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 42: 283–312, 2005 |
---|---|
AbstractList | To promote large‐scale science education reform, developers must create innovations that teachers can use to learn and enact new practices. As part of an urban systemic reform effort, science materials were designed to reflect desired reforms and to support teacher thinking by addressing necessary content, pedagogy, and pedagogical content knowledge for teachers. The goal of this research was to describe teachers' enactments in comparison to reform as instantiated in the materials. Four middle school teachers' initial enactment of an inquiry‐based science unit on force and motion were analyzed. Findings indicate two teachers' enactments were consistent with intentions and two teachers' enactments were not. However, enactment ratings for the first two were less reflective of curriculum intent when challenges were greatest, such as when teachers attempted to present challenging science ideas, respond to students' ideas, structure investigations, guide small‐group discussions, or make adaptations. Overall, findings suggest that purposefully using materials with detailed lesson descriptions and specific, consistent supports for teacher thinking can help teachers with enactment. However, materials alone are not sufficient; reform efforts must include professional development and efforts to create systemic change in context and policy to support teacher learning and classroom enactment. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 42: 283–312, 2005 To promote large-scale science education reform, developers must create innovations that teachers can use to learn and enact new practices. As part of an urban systemic reform effort, science materials were designed to reflect desired reforms and to support teacher thinking by addressing necessary content, pedagogy, and pedagogical content knowledge for teachers. The goal of this research was to describe teachers' enactments in comparison to reform as instantiated in the materials. Four middle school teachers' initial enactment of an inquiry-based science unit on force and motion were analyzed. Findings indicate two teachers' enactments were consistent with intentions and two teachers' enactments were not. However, enactment ratings for the first two were less reflective of curriculum intent when challenges were greatest, such as when teachers attempted to present challenging science ideas, respond to students' ideas, structure investigations, guide small-group discussions, or make adaptations. Overall, findings suggest that purposefully using materials with detailed lesson descriptions and specific, consistent supports for teacher thinking can help teachers with enactment. However, materials alone are not sufficient; reform efforts must include professional development and efforts to create systemic change in context and policy to support teacher learning and classroom enactment. |
Author | Blumenfeld, Phyllis Schneider, Rebecca M. Krajcik, Joseph |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Rebecca M. surname: Schneider fullname: Schneider, Rebecca M. email: rebecca.schneider@utoledo.edu organization: College of Education, University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street, Toledo, Ohio 43606-3390 – sequence: 2 givenname: Joseph surname: Krajcik fullname: Krajcik, Joseph organization: School of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan – sequence: 3 givenname: Phyllis surname: Blumenfeld fullname: Blumenfeld, Phyllis organization: School of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan |
BackLink | http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ760096$$DView record in ERIC http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16752741$$DView record in Pascal Francis |
BookMark | eNp9kDtPHTEQhS1EpFwIRXoKNylSLPjB2rvpEFzeSpoLVMiaOzsGJ7teZK-U8O9jcnlIkaCa4pzvzJzZYOtxjMTYZyl2pBBqdyLYUULU9RqbSdE2lbLarLNZ0VS1p0XzkW3k_FMIoVvZztjNPAJOId7yRH5MQ7WETB3PGCgi8QEmSgH6_I0v7ogniLfER8_LGryjxOmRHihOmYf4FMGxh5zTOA75E_vgC0xbT3OTXR7NFwcn1cWP49OD_YsKdd3UFSybDlsE8o3XZI1Es1QNEvnWkJdGo_UkVGcMIHVgW0GtxFoqU3caCPQm-7LKvYeM0PtyJ4bs7lMYID04aWyt7J4svu2Vr5TCF3l-Zo0QrSny15WMaSwNyL8mCPf4Xld6u3_vLd7d_7wYJpjCGKcEoX-P-B16eng72i3m-89EtSJCnujPCwHplzNW29pdfz92h-f6SF-dKKf1X1D_nZc |
CODEN | JRSTAR |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1086_670738 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_21171 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_20240 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci13050471 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2011_02_007 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10763_011_9292_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_21328 crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2012_661484 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tate_2019_04_005 crossref_primary_10_1080_09500690701579553 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_21562 crossref_primary_10_3102_0034654307313793 crossref_primary_10_1080_1046560X_2016_1277597 crossref_primary_10_3102_0034654311415121 crossref_primary_10_56423_fbod_1330938 crossref_primary_10_1080_13664530_2016_1273848 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11165_016_9556_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tate_2017_04_019 crossref_primary_10_1177_002205741519500105 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2021_106814 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11528_020_00576_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_010_9258_z crossref_primary_10_1080_09500690601091865 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21323 crossref_primary_10_1080_1046560X_2024_2378623 crossref_primary_10_1080_13664530701827756 crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2011_609189 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21528 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_21272 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci12040282 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11165_017_9645_z crossref_primary_10_1080_1046560X_2021_2005229 crossref_primary_10_1080_1046560X_2019_1705535 crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2010_490926 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_20219 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11165_017_9671_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tate_2017_01_011 crossref_primary_10_1080_10508406_2011_591718 crossref_primary_10_1080_07370008_2021_2010215 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21257 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11165_016_9539_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10972_008_9096_5 crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2013_829254 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_20441 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_024_10157_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tate_2016_10_016 crossref_primary_10_1080_10508400709336943 crossref_primary_10_5817_PedOr2014_1_77 crossref_primary_10_1177_2156759X211011908 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_018_9756_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s10972_012_9313_0 crossref_primary_10_1080_1475939X_2019_1583121 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_873X_2011_00563_x crossref_primary_10_1080_09500690701506945 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11423_009_9146_5 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_21676 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_20293 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10763_010_9268_6 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_20379 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40594_020_0204_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10972_011_9229_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10972_013_9361_0 crossref_primary_10_1086_674053 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21516 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tate_2022_103869 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_20294 crossref_primary_10_1080_00220973_2011_573019 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_008_9104_8 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21480 crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2014_942719 crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2013_880004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tate_2020_103231 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_20399 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_20167 crossref_primary_10_1080_1046560X_2016_1277600 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_20444 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10972_012_9309_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11165_020_09924_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cedpsych_2014_10_005 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21329 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_20381 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_20140 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10972_010_9194_z crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2011_618193 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_011_9363_7 crossref_primary_10_33225_jbse_19_18_197 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11191_007_9080_z crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2014_919425 crossref_primary_10_1080_1475939X_2019_1595707 crossref_primary_10_3102_0002831211410864 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10972_010_9223_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_012_9415_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10972_015_9433_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10972_011_9245_0 crossref_primary_10_1080_0047231X_2021_12290536 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2018_02474 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_013_9486_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10972_010_9186_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_020_09828_6 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_20391 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_20367 crossref_primary_10_1080_1046560X_2018_1514825 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10972_009_9172_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11251_010_9127_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_ssm_12276 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_21595 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10763_012_9342_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_00220270802696115 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_20265 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11251_009_9099_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tsc_2013_07_008 |
Cites_doi | 10.3102/00346543052002201 10.1002/tea.1037 10.1086/461791 10.1016/0742-051X(89)90015-2 10.3102/0013189X029001004 10.1002/tea.10029 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00058-9 10.1207/s15326985ep2703_3 10.1002/tea.1030 10.1086/499645 10.1002/tea.1039 10.1086/461719 10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_16 10.1086/461723 10.1002/tea.1040 10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_27 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_2 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00061-9 10.1023/A:1016569117024 10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057 10.1007/978-94-011-0495-1 10.1002/tea.10013 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<1019::AID-TEA9>3.0.CO;2-J 10.3102/00346543065002093 10.1023/A:1021840407112 10.1002/tea.3660290808 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8 10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_38 10.1111/0362-6784.00130 10.3102/0013189X025009006 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_3 10.3102/0013189X015002004 10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2 10.3102/00346543068002202 10.1086/461722 10.7551/mitpress/1861.001.0001 10.1086/461781 10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_25 10.1086/461870 10.1016/0742-051X(87)90012-6 10.1086/461780 10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<3::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-V 10.1007/BF00694594 10.1002/tea.1038 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2005 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. – notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION 7SW BJH BNH BNI BNJ BNO ERI PET REK WWN IQODW |
DOI | 10.1002/tea.20055 |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef ERIC ERIC (Ovid) ERIC ERIC ERIC (Legacy Platform) ERIC( SilverPlatter ) ERIC ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform) Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) ERIC Pascal-Francis |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ERIC |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef ERIC |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ERI name: ERIC url: https://eric.ed.gov/ sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Education Sciences (General) Physics |
EISSN | 1098-2736 |
ERIC | EJ760096 |
EndPage | 312 |
ExternalDocumentID | 16752741 EJ760096 10_1002_tea_20055 TEA20055 ark_67375_WNG_DK3F3VH2_3 |
Genre | article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Science Foundation (Center for Learning Technologies in Education) funderid: 0830 310 A605 |
GroupedDBID | -DZ -W8 -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 07C 0R~ 10A 186 1L6 1OB 1OC 2FS 31~ 33P 3SF 3WU 4.4 4R4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5VS 66C 6TJ 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 85S 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHSB AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYJJ AAYOK AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABIVO ABJNI ABPPZ ABPVW ABTAH ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACKOT ACNCT ACPOU ACSCC ACTDY ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADMHG ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFZJQ AHBTC AI. AIAGR AIDAL AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB B-7 BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 CJ0 CS3 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMBU DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD F00 F01 F04 FEDTE G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.T H.X HBH HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZ~ H~9 IX1 J0M JPC KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LPU LUTES LW6 LYRES M63 MEWTI MK4 MQT MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NEJ NF~ NHB NNB O66 O9- OHT OIG P2P P2W P2X P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RWI RX1 RYL SAMSI SUPJJ TN5 TWZ UB1 UKR ULY UPT V8K VH1 VJK VQA VQP W8V W99 WBKPD WGMDG WH7 WHG WIB WIH WIK WOHZO WQJ WRC WSUWO WWE WXSBR XG1 XPP XV2 XZL YCJ YQI YQT YYQ YZZ ZCA ZCG ZHY ZY4 ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAHQN AAMNL AANHP AAYCA ACRPL ACYXJ ADNMO AFWVQ ALVPJ YR5 AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION 7SW AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY BJH BNH BNI BNJ BNO ERI PET REK WWN IQODW |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3585-ab8dc9caef8f3e761c6b28ceef96ef163c7fe02d66aceda790e91c51265d3aea3 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0022-4308 |
IngestDate | Mon Dec 23 03:32:06 EST 2024 Tue Sep 02 19:18:20 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:44:27 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:40 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:13:52 EST 2025 Wed Oct 30 09:54:23 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | false |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | Classroom Educational change Professional development Science Education Secondary School Teacher Teachers training |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3585-ab8dc9caef8f3e761c6b28ceef96ef163c7fe02d66aceda790e91c51265d3aea3 |
Notes | istex:E3EE3180266B7B1F622839384912CA3E74575E31 ark:/67375/WNG-DK3F3VH2-3 National Science Foundation (Center for Learning Technologies in Education) - No. 0830 310 A605 Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. More information about this work, including the curriculum materials "Why do I need to wear a bike helmet?" used in this study, can be obtained from our project's website (http://hi-ce.org/teacherworkroom/middleschool/physics/index.html). ArticleID:TEA20055 http://hi‐ce.org/teacherworkroom/middleschool/physics/index.html More information about this work, including the curriculum materials “Why do I need to wear a bike helmet?” used in this study, can be obtained from our project's website . |
PageCount | 30 |
ParticipantIDs | pascalfrancis_primary_16752741 eric_primary_EJ760096 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_20055 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_tea_20055 wiley_primary_10_1002_tea_20055_TEA20055 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_DK3F3VH2_3 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | March 2005 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2005-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2005 text: March 2005 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Hoboken |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hoboken – name: New York, NY |
PublicationTitle | Journal of research in science teaching |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J. Res. Sci. Teach |
PublicationYear | 2005 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company John Wiley & Sons, Inc Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: Wiley |
References | Schneider, R.M. & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 167-217. Singer, J., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35, 164-178. Pinkard, N. (2000). Can culturally responsive technological curricular materials motivate teachers to reflect on their instructional practices and perceptions of students' abilities? New Orleans, LA: Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. Seiler, G., Tobin, K., & Sokolic, J. (2001). Design, technology, and science: Sites for learning, resistance, and social reproduction in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 746-767. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press. Chang, H.-h., Honey, M., Light, D., Moeller, B., & Ross, N. (1998). The Union City story: Education reform and technology students' performance on standardized tests. New York: Education Development Center, Center for Children and Technology. Roth, W.M. (1995). Authentic school science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Lampert, M. & Ball, D.L. (1998). Mathematics, teaching and multimedia: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press. Stratford, S.J., Krajcik, J.S., & Soloway, E. (1998). Secondary students' dynamic modeling processes: Analyzing reasoning about, synthesizing, and testing models of stream ecosystems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 215-234. Schneider, R.M. & Center for Highly Interactive Computing in Education (1999). Why do I need to wear a bike helmet? Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A.M. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-389. Bouillion, L.M. & Gomez, L. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 878-898. Carlsen, W.S. (1992). Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27, 15-21. Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J.S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. Elementary School Journal, 97, 341-358. Putnam, R.T., Heaton, R.M., Prawat, R.S., & Remillard, J.T. (1992). Teaching mathematics for understanding: Discussing case studies of four fifth-grade teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 213-228. Krajcik, J., Soloway, E., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Ladewski, B., Bos, N., et al. (1996). The casebook of project practices: An example of an interactive multimedia system for professional development. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 15, 119-135. Putnam, R.T. & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15. McGilly, K. (1996). Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. Cambridge, MA: Bradford. Scott, C. (1994). Project-based science reflections of a middle school teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 95, 75-94. Kahle, J.B., Meece, J., & Scantlebury, K. (2000). Urban African-American middle school science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1019-1041. Anderson, R.D. (1995). Curriculum reform: Dilemmas and promise. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 33-36. Prawat, R.S. (1992). Are changes in views about mathematics teaching sufficient? The case of a fifth-grade teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 195-211. White, B.Y. & Frederiksen, J.R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118. Linn, M.C. (1998). The impact of technology on science instruction: Historical trends and current opportunities. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (vol. 1, pp. 265-294). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Ball, D.L. & Cohen, D.K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25, 6-8, 14. Smith, D.C. & Neale, D.C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1-20. Metz, K.E. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65, 93-128. Meyer, K.M. (1997). Catalysts and impediments to change in science teachers' beliefs and practices. Ann Arbor: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Bass, C., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313-350. Cohen, D.K. & Ball, D.L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement (No. CPRE Research Report RR-043). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Hashweh, M.Z. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109-120. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Heaton, R.M. (1992). Who is minding the content: A case study of a fifth-grade teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 153-162. Spillane, J.P., Diamond, J.B., Walker, L.J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 918-940. Fishman, B., Best, S., Foster, J., & Marx, R.W. (2000). Fostering teacher learning in systemic reform: A design proposal for developing professional development. New Orleans, LA: Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching. Minstrell, J. & Van Zee, E.H. (2000). Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press. Ruopp, R. (1993). LabNet: Toward a community of practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2, 305-319. Barton, A.C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 899-917. National Science Teachers Association (2003). Standards for science teacher preparation. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Anderson, R.D. & Helms, J.V. (2001). The ideal of standards and the reality of schools: Needed research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 3-16. Blumenfeld, P.C., Fishman, B.J., Krajcik, J.S., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling-up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35, 149-164. Rivet, A., Krajcik, J., Marx, R., & Riser, B. (2003). Design principles for developing inquiry materials with embedded technologies. Chicago, IL: Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. Franke, M.L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers' self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 67-80. Gess-Newsome, J. & Lederman, N.G. (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (vol. 6). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Anderson, R.D. (1992). Perspectives on complexity: An essay on curricular reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 861-876. Fishman, B. & Best, S. (2000). Professional development in systemic reform: Using worksessions to foster change among teachers with diverse needs. New Orleans, LA: Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching. Remillard, J.T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers' curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29, 315-342. Songer, N.B., Lee, H.-S., & Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 128-150. Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (2002). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Thomas, G., Wineburg, S., Grossman, P., Myhre, O., & Woolworth, S. (1998). In the company of colleagues: An interim report on the development of a community of teacher learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 21-32. Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V.N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 201-217. Ladewski, B.L., Krajcik, J.S., & Harvey, C. (1994). A middle grade science teacher's emerging understanding of project-based instruction. Elementary School Journal, 94, 499-516. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291-315. Rivet, A. (2003). Contextualizing instruction and stude 2002; 39 1989; 5 1987; 3 2000; 29 1999; 29 1982; 52 2002; 13 1995; 77 1986; 15 1998 1999; 24 1997 1996 1995 1994 2003 1992 2002 1999; 6 1996; 15 1993; 2 1992; 93 1999 1998; 68 1998; 16 1991; 26 1990 2000 2000; 37 1997; 97 2000; 35 1995; 65 1992; 29 2001; 38 1998; 2 1998; 1 2000; 100 1992; 27 1996; 25 1998; 7 1994; 94 1994; 95 1998; 14 Borko H. (e_1_2_1_12_1) 1990 Brown A.L. (e_1_2_1_14_1) 1994 National Science Teachers Association (e_1_2_1_50_1) 2003 Franke M.L. (e_1_2_1_27_1) 1998 Cohen D.K. (e_1_2_1_20_1) 2002 e_1_2_1_60_1 e_1_2_1_41_1 e_1_2_1_66_1 e_1_2_1_68_1 Wilson S.M. (e_1_2_1_80_1) 1999 e_1_2_1_45_1 e_1_2_1_62_1 Fishman B. (e_1_2_1_25_1) 2000 e_1_2_1_43_1 e_1_2_1_64_1 Darling‐Hammond L. (e_1_2_1_22_1) 1999 e_1_2_1_26_1 Miles M.B. (e_1_2_1_47_1) 1994 Snyder J. (e_1_2_1_69_1) 1992 Bybee R.W. (e_1_2_1_15_1) 1994 McGilly K. (e_1_2_1_44_1) 1996 Rivet A. (e_1_2_1_58_1) 2003 e_1_2_1_71_1 Linn M.C. (e_1_2_1_39_1) 1998 Schneider R.M. (e_1_2_1_61_1) 1999 e_1_2_1_31_1 e_1_2_1_54_1 e_1_2_1_77_1 e_1_2_1_8_1 American Association for the Advancement of Science (e_1_2_1_2_1) 1990 e_1_2_1_56_1 e_1_2_1_79_1 e_1_2_1_6_1 e_1_2_1_73_1 e_1_2_1_10_1 Cohen D.K. (e_1_2_1_19_1) 1999 e_1_2_1_33_1 e_1_2_1_52_1 e_1_2_1_75_1 Krajcik J. (e_1_2_1_36_1) 1996; 15 Carlsen W.S. (e_1_2_1_16_1) 1992; 27 e_1_2_1_37_1 e_1_2_1_18_1 Krajcik J. (e_1_2_1_34_1) 2002 Blumenfeld P.C. (e_1_2_1_9_1) 1996 National Research Council (e_1_2_1_49_1) 1996 Chang H.‐h. (e_1_2_1_17_1) 1998 e_1_2_1_42_1 e_1_2_1_65_1 e_1_2_1_40_1 e_1_2_1_67_1 e_1_2_1_21_1 e_1_2_1_63_1 Davis E.A. (e_1_2_1_23_1) 2002 Pinkard N. (e_1_2_1_51_1) 2000 Borko H. (e_1_2_1_11_1) 1996 Fishman B. (e_1_2_1_24_1) 2000 Minstrell J. (e_1_2_1_48_1) 2000 e_1_2_1_29_1 Gess‐Newsome J. (e_1_2_1_28_1) 1999 e_1_2_1_70_1 Rivet A. (e_1_2_1_57_1) 2003 e_1_2_1_7_1 Lampert M. (e_1_2_1_38_1) 1998 e_1_2_1_30_1 e_1_2_1_55_1 e_1_2_1_76_1 e_1_2_1_5_1 e_1_2_1_78_1 e_1_2_1_3_1 Meyer K.M. (e_1_2_1_46_1) 1997 e_1_2_1_13_1 e_1_2_1_72_1 e_1_2_1_32_1 e_1_2_1_53_1 e_1_2_1_74_1 Anderson R.D. (e_1_2_1_4_1) 1995; 77 Krajcik J. (e_1_2_1_35_1) 2000 e_1_2_1_59_1 |
References_xml | – reference: Fishman, B., Best, S., Foster, J., & Marx, R.W. (2000). Fostering teacher learning in systemic reform: A design proposal for developing professional development. New Orleans, LA: Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching. – reference: Franke, M.L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers' self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 67-80. – reference: Bouillion, L.M. & Gomez, L. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 878-898. – reference: Carlsen, W.S. (1992). Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27, 15-21. – reference: Stratford, S.J., Krajcik, J.S., & Soloway, E. (1998). Secondary students' dynamic modeling processes: Analyzing reasoning about, synthesizing, and testing models of stream ecosystems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 215-234. – reference: Kahle, J.B., Meece, J., & Scantlebury, K. (2000). Urban African-American middle school science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1019-1041. – reference: Fishman, B. & Best, S. (2000). Professional development in systemic reform: Using worksessions to foster change among teachers with diverse needs. New Orleans, LA: Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching. – reference: National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. – reference: Anderson, R.D. (1992). Perspectives on complexity: An essay on curricular reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 861-876. – reference: Barton, A.C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 899-917. – reference: Ruopp, R. (1993). LabNet: Toward a community of practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2, 305-319. – reference: Anderson, R.D. & Helms, J.V. (2001). The ideal of standards and the reality of schools: Needed research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 3-16. – reference: Lampert, M. & Ball, D.L. (1998). Mathematics, teaching and multimedia: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press. – reference: Hashweh, M.Z. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109-120. – reference: Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V.N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 201-217. – reference: American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press. – reference: Rivet, A. (2003). Contextualizing instruction and student learning in middle school project-based science classrooms. Ann Arbor: Unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan. – reference: Linn, M.C. (1998). The impact of technology on science instruction: Historical trends and current opportunities. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (vol. 1, pp. 265-294). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. – reference: Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J.S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. Elementary School Journal, 97, 341-358. – reference: Schneider, R.M. & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 167-217. – reference: Minstrell, J. & Van Zee, E.H. (2000). Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press. – reference: Singer, J., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35, 164-178. – reference: Rivet, A., Krajcik, J., Marx, R., & Riser, B. (2003). Design principles for developing inquiry materials with embedded technologies. Chicago, IL: Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. – reference: Schneider, R.M. & Center for Highly Interactive Computing in Education (1999). Why do I need to wear a bike helmet? Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. – reference: Prawat, R.S. (1992). Are changes in views about mathematics teaching sufficient? The case of a fifth-grade teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 195-211. – reference: Remillard, J.T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers' curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29, 315-342. – reference: Spillane, J.P., Diamond, J.B., Walker, L.J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 918-940. – reference: Franke, M.L., Carpenter, T., Levi, L.W., & Fennema, E. (1998). Teachers as learners: Developing understanding through children's thinking. San Diego, CA: Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. – reference: Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Bass, C., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313-350. – reference: Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (2002). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill. – reference: Gess-Newsome, J. & Lederman, N.G. (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (vol. 6). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. – reference: Krajcik, J., Soloway, E., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Ladewski, B., Bos, N., et al. (1996). The casebook of project practices: An example of an interactive multimedia system for professional development. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 15, 119-135. – reference: White, B.Y. & Frederiksen, J.R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118. – reference: Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14. – reference: Smith, D.C. & Neale, D.C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1-20. – reference: Chang, H.-h., Honey, M., Light, D., Moeller, B., & Ross, N. (1998). The Union City story: Education reform and technology students' performance on standardized tests. New York: Education Development Center, Center for Children and Technology. – reference: Blumenfeld, P.C., Fishman, B.J., Krajcik, J.S., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling-up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35, 149-164. – reference: Ladewski, B.L., Krajcik, J.S., & Harvey, C. (1994). A middle grade science teacher's emerging understanding of project-based instruction. Elementary School Journal, 94, 499-516. – reference: Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A.M. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-389. – reference: Krajcik, J., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., & Fishman, B. (2000). Inquiry based science supported by technology: Achievement among urban middle school students. New Orleans, LA: Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching. – reference: Remillard, J.T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 331-350. – reference: Seiler, G., Tobin, K., & Sokolic, J. (2001). Design, technology, and science: Sites for learning, resistance, and social reproduction in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 746-767. – reference: Heaton, R.M. (1992). Who is minding the content: A case study of a fifth-grade teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 153-162. – reference: Tobin, K., Roth, W.-M., & Zimmermann, A. (2001). Learning to teach science in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 941-964. – reference: Putnam, R.T., Heaton, R.M., Prawat, R.S., & Remillard, J.T. (1992). Teaching mathematics for understanding: Discussing case studies of four fifth-grade teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 213-228. – reference: Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. – reference: Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291-315. – reference: Songer, N.B., Lee, H.-S., & Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 128-150. – reference: Roth, W.M. (1995). Authentic school science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. – reference: Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J.S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B. , et al. ( 1994). Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers. Elementary School Journal, 94, 499-516. – reference: Thomas, G., Wineburg, S., Grossman, P., Myhre, O., & Woolworth, S. (1998). In the company of colleagues: An interim report on the development of a community of teacher learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 21-32. – reference: Schneider, R.M., Krajcik, J., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 410-422. – reference: Scott, C. (1994). Project-based science reflections of a middle school teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 95, 75-94. – reference: Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A.W., & Hoy, W.K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248. – reference: National Science Teachers Association (2003). Standards for science teacher preparation. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association. – reference: Pinkard, N. (2000). Can culturally responsive technological curricular materials motivate teachers to reflect on their instructional practices and perceptions of students' abilities? New Orleans, LA: Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. – reference: Ball, D.L. & Cohen, D.K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25, 6-8, 14. – reference: Anderson, R.D. (1995). Curriculum reform: Dilemmas and promise. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 33-36. – reference: Putnam, R.T. & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15. – reference: Cohen, D.K. & Ball, D.L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement (No. CPRE Research Report RR-043). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Consortium for Policy Research in Education. – reference: McGilly, K. (1996). Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. Cambridge, MA: Bradford. – reference: Meyer, K.M. (1997). Catalysts and impediments to change in science teachers' beliefs and practices. Ann Arbor: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. – reference: Metz, K.E. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65, 93-128. – reference: Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. – volume: 38 start-page: 878 year: 2001 end-page: 898 article-title: Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school–community partnerships as contextual scaffolds publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching – volume: 25 start-page: 6 year: 1996 end-page: 8 article-title: Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? publication-title: Educational Researcher – start-page: 80 year: 2002 end-page: 119 – volume: 1 start-page: 421 year: 1998 end-page: 447 – volume: 24 start-page: 173 year: 1999 end-page: 209 – volume: 14 start-page: 67 year: 1998 end-page: 80 article-title: Understanding teachers' self‐sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development publication-title: Teaching and Teacher Education – volume: 77 start-page: 33 year: 1995 end-page: 36 article-title: Curriculum reform: Dilemmas and promise publication-title: Phi Delta Kappan – volume: 35 start-page: 149 year: 2000 end-page: 164 article-title: Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling‐up technology‐embedded project‐based science in urban schools publication-title: Educational Psychologist – volume: 7 start-page: 313 year: 1998 end-page: 350 article-title: Inquiry in project‐based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students publication-title: Journal of the Learning Sciences – volume: 2 start-page: 305 year: 1993 end-page: 319 article-title: LabNet: Toward a community of practice publication-title: Journal of Science Education and Technology – volume: 2 start-page: 667 year: 1998 end-page: 680 – volume: 38 start-page: 941 year: 2001 end-page: 964 article-title: Learning to teach science in urban schools publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching – volume: 93 start-page: 213 year: 1992 end-page: 228 article-title: Teaching mathematics for understanding: Discussing case studies of four fifth‐grade teachers publication-title: The Elementary School Journal – start-page: 229 year: 1994 end-page: 270 – year: 1990 – volume: 27 start-page: 291 year: 1992 end-page: 315 article-title: The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data publication-title: Educational Psychologist – year: 1994 – volume: 38 start-page: 899 year: 2001 end-page: 917 article-title: Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching – start-page: 357 year: 1994 end-page: 387 – year: 1998 – volume: 29 start-page: 315 year: 1999 end-page: 342 article-title: Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers' curriculum development publication-title: Curriculum Inquiry – volume: 38 start-page: 918 year: 2001 end-page: 940 article-title: Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching – volume: 16 start-page: 3 year: 1998 end-page: 118 article-title: Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students publication-title: Cognition and Instruction – volume: 35 start-page: 164 year: 2000 end-page: 178 article-title: Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform publication-title: Educational Psychologist – volume: 37 start-page: 1019 year: 2000 end-page: 1041 article-title: Urban African‐American middle school science students: Does standards‐based teaching make a difference? publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching – volume: 100 start-page: 331 year: 2000 end-page: 350 article-title: Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth‐grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text publication-title: The Elementary School Journal – volume: 38 start-page: 746 year: 2001 end-page: 767 article-title: Design, technology, and science: Sites for learning, resistance, and social reproduction in urban schools publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching – start-page: 402 year: 1992 end-page: 435 – volume: 93 start-page: 153 year: 1992 end-page: 162 article-title: Who is minding the content: A case study of a fifth‐grade teacher publication-title: The Elementary School Journal – volume: 7 start-page: 215 year: 1998 end-page: 234 article-title: Secondary students' dynamic modeling processes: Analyzing reasoning about, synthesizing, and testing models of stream ecosystems publication-title: Journal of Science Education and Technology – year: 1997 – volume: 26 start-page: 369 year: 1991 end-page: 389 article-title: Motivating project‐based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning publication-title: Educational Psychologist – volume: 38 start-page: 3 year: 2001 end-page: 16 article-title: The ideal of standards and the reality of schools: Needed research publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching – volume: 52 start-page: 201 year: 1982 end-page: 217 article-title: The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research publication-title: Review of Educational Research – volume: 93 start-page: 195 year: 1992 end-page: 211 article-title: Are changes in views about mathematics teaching sufficient? The case of a fifth‐grade teacher publication-title: The Elementary School Journal – volume: 1 start-page: 471 year: 1998 end-page: 485 – start-page: 71 year: 2002 end-page: 78 – volume: 13 start-page: 167 year: 2002 end-page: 217 article-title: Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials publication-title: Journal of Science Teacher Education – volume: 15 start-page: 4 year: 1986 end-page: 14 article-title: Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching publication-title: Educational Researcher – year: 2003 – year: 1996 – year: 2000 – volume: 95 start-page: 75 year: 1994 end-page: 94 article-title: Project‐based science reflections of a middle school teacher publication-title: The Elementary School Journal – volume: 14 start-page: 21 year: 1998 end-page: 32 article-title: In the company of colleagues: An interim report on the development of a community of teacher learners publication-title: Teaching and Teacher Education – volume: 94 start-page: 499 year: 1994 end-page: 516 article-title: A middle grade science teacher's emerging understanding of project‐based instruction publication-title: Elementary School Journal – volume: 94 start-page: 499 year: 1994 end-page: 516 article-title: Enacting project‐based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers publication-title: Elementary School Journal – volume: 65 start-page: 93 year: 1995 end-page: 128 article-title: Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's science instruction publication-title: Review of Educational Research – volume: 29 start-page: 861 year: 1992 end-page: 876 article-title: Perspectives on complexity: An essay on curricular reform publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching – volume: 15 start-page: 119 year: 1996 end-page: 135 article-title: The casebook of project practices: An example of an interactive multimedia system for professional development publication-title: Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching – volume: 97 start-page: 341 year: 1997 end-page: 358 article-title: Enacting project‐based science publication-title: Elementary School Journal – year: 2002 – volume: 5 start-page: 1 year: 1989 end-page: 20 article-title: The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching publication-title: Teaching and Teacher Education – volume: 39 start-page: 128 year: 2002 end-page: 150 article-title: Technology‐rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching – volume: 29 start-page: 4 year: 2000 end-page: 15 article-title: What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? publication-title: Educational Researcher – year: 1995 – volume: 6 year: 1999 – volume: 39 start-page: 410 year: 2002 end-page: 422 article-title: Performance of students in project‐based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching – volume: 1 start-page: 265 year: 1998 end-page: 294 – volume: 68 start-page: 202 year: 1998 end-page: 248 article-title: Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure publication-title: Review of Educational Research – volume: 1 start-page: 249 year: 1998 end-page: 264 – start-page: 311 year: 1990 end-page: 346 – volume: 27 start-page: 15 year: 1992 end-page: 21 article-title: Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content publication-title: Journal of Classroom Interaction – volume: 3 start-page: 109 year: 1987 end-page: 120 article-title: Effects of subject‐matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics publication-title: Teaching and Teacher Education – year: 1999 – volume-title: Why do I need to wear a bike helmet? year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_1_61_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_74_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_31_1 doi: 10.3102/00346543052002201 – volume: 15 start-page: 119 year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_1_36_1 article-title: The casebook of project practices: An example of an interactive multimedia system for professional development publication-title: Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching – ident: e_1_2_1_13_1 doi: 10.1002/tea.1037 – ident: e_1_2_1_64_1 doi: 10.1086/461791 – ident: e_1_2_1_68_1 doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(89)90015-2 – ident: e_1_2_1_53_1 doi: 10.3102/0013189X029001004 – ident: e_1_2_1_63_1 doi: 10.1002/tea.10029 – volume-title: Instruction, capacity, and improvement (No. CPRE Research Report RR‐043) year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_1_19_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_21_1 – volume-title: Can culturally responsive technological curricular materials motivate teachers to reflect on their instructional practices and perceptions of students' abilities? year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_1_51_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_73_1 doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00058-9 – start-page: 357 volume-title: Handbook of research on science teaching and learning year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_1_15_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_18_1 doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2703_3 – ident: e_1_2_1_65_1 doi: 10.1002/tea.1030 – volume-title: Teachers as learners: Developing understanding through children's thinking year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_1_27_1 – start-page: 173 volume-title: Review of Research in Education year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_1_80_1 – volume-title: Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_1_48_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_56_1 doi: 10.1086/499645 – ident: e_1_2_1_71_1 doi: 10.1002/tea.1039 – ident: e_1_2_1_30_1 doi: 10.1086/461719 – volume-title: Contextualizing instruction and student learning in middle school project‐based science classrooms year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_1_57_1 – volume-title: The Union City story: Education reform and technology students' performance on standardized tests year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_1_17_1 – volume-title: Inquiry based science supported by technology: Achievement among urban middle school students year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_1_35_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_40_1 doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_16 – ident: e_1_2_1_54_1 doi: 10.1086/461723 – ident: e_1_2_1_75_1 doi: 10.1002/tea.1040 – volume-title: Mathematics, teaching and multimedia: Investigations of real practice year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_1_38_1 – volume-title: Standards for science teacher preparation year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_1_50_1 – volume-title: Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project‐based approach year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_1_34_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_78_1 doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_27 – start-page: 80 volume-title: Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_1_20_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_8_1 doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_2 – ident: e_1_2_1_26_1 doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00061-9 – volume-title: Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_1_28_1 – volume-title: International handbook of teachers and teaching year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_1_9_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_62_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1016569117024 – ident: e_1_2_1_33_1 doi: 10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057 – volume-title: Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_1_47_1 – volume-title: Handbook of educational psychology year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_1_11_1 – start-page: 71 volume-title: Keeping learning complex: The Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_1_23_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_59_1 doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-0495-1 – ident: e_1_2_1_70_1 doi: 10.1002/tea.10013 – volume-title: Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_1_22_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_32_1 doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<1019::AID-TEA9>3.0.CO;2-J – start-page: 265 volume-title: The impact of technology on science instruction: Historical trends and current opportunities year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_1_39_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_45_1 doi: 10.3102/00346543065002093 – ident: e_1_2_1_72_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1021840407112 – ident: e_1_2_1_3_1 doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290808 – volume-title: Professional development in systemic reform: Using worksessions to foster change among teachers with diverse needs year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_1_24_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_10_1 doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8 – ident: e_1_2_1_43_1 doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_38 – ident: e_1_2_1_55_1 doi: 10.1111/0362-6784.00130 – start-page: 402 volume-title: Handbook of research on curriculum year: 1992 ident: e_1_2_1_69_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_6_1 doi: 10.3102/0013189X025009006 – ident: e_1_2_1_67_1 doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_3 – ident: e_1_2_1_66_1 doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004 – ident: e_1_2_1_79_1 doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2 – volume: 77 start-page: 33 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_1_4_1 article-title: Curriculum reform: Dilemmas and promise publication-title: Phi Delta Kappan – volume-title: Design principles for developing inquiry materials with embedded technologies year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_1_58_1 – volume-title: Catalysts and impediments to change in science teachers' beliefs and practices year: 1997 ident: e_1_2_1_46_1 – start-page: 311 volume-title: Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction year: 1990 ident: e_1_2_1_12_1 – start-page: 229 volume-title: Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_1_14_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_76_1 doi: 10.3102/00346543068002202 – ident: e_1_2_1_52_1 doi: 10.1086/461722 – volume-title: Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_1_44_1 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/1861.001.0001 – volume-title: National science education standards year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_1_49_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_41_1 doi: 10.1086/461781 – ident: e_1_2_1_77_1 doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_25 – volume: 27 start-page: 15 year: 1992 ident: e_1_2_1_16_1 article-title: Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content publication-title: Journal of Classroom Interaction – ident: e_1_2_1_42_1 doi: 10.1086/461870 – ident: e_1_2_1_29_1 doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(87)90012-6 – ident: e_1_2_1_37_1 doi: 10.1086/461780 – ident: e_1_2_1_5_1 doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<3::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-V – volume-title: Science for all Americans year: 1990 ident: e_1_2_1_2_1 – volume-title: Fostering teacher learning in systemic reform: A design proposal for developing professional development year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_1_25_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_60_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00694594 – ident: e_1_2_1_7_1 doi: 10.1002/tea.1038 |
SSID | ssj0003919 |
Score | 2.1781044 |
Snippet | To promote large‐scale science education reform, developers must create innovations that teachers can use to learn and enact new practices. As part of an urban... To promote large-scale science education reform, developers must create innovations that teachers can use to learn and enact new practices. As part of an urban... |
SourceID | pascalfrancis eric crossref wiley istex |
SourceType | Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 283 |
SubjectTerms | Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods Educational Change Educational sciences Exact and natural sciences Middle School Teachers Pedagogical Content Knowledge Physics Professional Development Science Instruction Science Materials Scientific Concepts Teaching Methods Units of Study Urban Areas |
Title | Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-DK3F3VH2-3/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Ftea.20055 http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ760096 |
Volume | 42 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3BbtQwELWq9sIFaGnFAl1ZCKH2kDaJN04Mpwp2uyqiB9RCD0iWM7YRKkrR7laqeuIT-Ea-hBnHyWoRlRC3SBknY3uceePMPDP2wjolZJGJBAprkpEtITFZWSdFAQr9XV34lAqF35_K6fno5KK4WGOvu1qYlh-i33CjlRG-17TATT0_XJKG4hiELREqMKdcLQJEH5bUUUJlqmMKH4m06liF0vywb7nii2K68waN7g2lSJo5jpJvj7dYha7B90wesM-d1m3KyeXB9aI-gNs_CB3_s1sP2f2ISflRa0SbbM01W3Scc0z92GKb8Qsw53uRpnr_EdPjhooimi8cO4bI99ePn-QSLY9OlSMWbs37FUdj5DMqY-BXni9aEmnuqH2osONfm_gQDh2an2-z88n47M00icc1JCAw6EhMXVlQYJyvvHClzEDWeYVO2CvpPOI-KL1LcyulAWdNqVKnMkDAIQsrjDNih603V417zHhFtSWihBKqdOQqwDA9VZXKU4sBrQcxYHvdxGmIXOZ0pMY33bIw5xq7osMwDtjzXvR7S-DxN6Ftmv1eYHxC_yuVHLCXwRz6G2Z2SZlwZaE_nR7rt-_ERHyc5hoVGq7Yy_JVGJARQxBqHGb9bh302fgoXDz5d9Gn7F6gkg05cc_Y-mJ27XYRJC3qYVgNw7Ad8Bve3w4O |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtQwELZKe4AL0FLEQikWQqgc0ibx2okrLhXssvRnD2gLvVSW4x-EilK0u5VQTzwCz9gnYcZxsloEEuIWKeNkPB5nZpyZbwh5YZ1kgmcsMdzqpG8Lk-isqBLOjQR7V3GfYqHwyViMTvuHZ_xshbxua2EafIjuwA13Rvhe4wbHA-m9BWooCCGcifBbZA07eoeA6sMCPIrJTLZY4X2Wli2uUJrvdUOXrFFMeF5D-X7HJEk9Azn5psHFsvMarM_wHjlv-W6STi52r-bVrrn-DdLxfyd2n9yNbik9aPRonay4egM7Osfsjw2yHj8CM7oTkapfPSBqUGNdRP2ZwszA-b358ROtoqXRrlJwhxsN36egj3SKlQz00tN5gyNNHY4PRXb0Sx0fQk3r0M82yelwMHkzSmLHhsQwiDsSXZXWSKOdLz1zhciMqPIS7LCXwnlw_UzhXZpbIbRxVhcydTIz4HMIbpl2mj0kq_Vl7R4RWmJ5CStMYcq070oDkXoqS5mnFmJab1iP7LQrp0yEM8euGl9VA8ScK5iKCmLskecd6bcGw-NPRJu4_B3B4BB_WUrRIy-DPnQ39PQCk-EKrj6N36m3R2zIPo5yBQxtLynM4lUQkyFIEHAclv3vPKjJ4CBcPP530mfk9mhycqyO34-PnpA7AVk2pMhtkdX59Mo9BZ9pXm2HrfELTOgRKA |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1faxQxEB9qC-KL2lrx_FODiNSHbbObTTbRp-LdebZ6iLTaByFk80eksi13VxCf_Ah-Rj-JSTa7x4mC-Lawk93JZLIzk535DcBjYwVhNCeZpkZlpal0pvKqzijVwtu7mjocCoXfTNnkpDw8padr8LyrhWnxIfoDt7Az4vc6bPAL4_aXoKFeBvFIhF6BjZJhHlR6-G6JHUVELjqo8JJg3sEK4WK_H7pijFK-80YQ79eQI6nmXkyu7W-x6rtG4zO-AR87ttuck7O9y0W9p7_9huj4n_O6CdeTU4oOWi3ahDXbbIV-zin3Yws20ydgjnYTTvXTWyBHTaiKaD4hPzHv-v78_iPYRIOSVUXeGW71-xny2ohmoY4BnTu0aFGkkQ3jY4kd-tykhyDdufPzbTgZj45fTLLUryHTxEcdmaq50UIr67gjtmK5ZnXBvRV2glnnHT9dOYsLw5jS1qhKYCty7T0ORg1RVpHbsN6cN_YOIB6KS0ilK81xabn2cToWXBTY-IjWaTKA3W7hpE5g5qGnxhfZwjAX0k9FRjEO4FFPetEiePyJaDusfk8wOgw_LAUbwJOoDv0NNTsLqXAVlR-mL-XwiIzJ-0khPUM7K_qyfJWPyAJEkOc4rvrfeZDHo4N4cfffSR_C1bfDsXz9anp0D65FWNmYH3cf1hezS_vAO0yLeidujF8tzg_g |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enacting+reform-based+science+materials%3A+The+range+of+teacher+enactments+in+reform+classrooms&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+research+in+science+teaching&rft.au=SCHNEIDER%2C+Rebecca+M&rft.au=KRAJCIK%2C+Joseph&rft.au=BLUMENFELD%2C+Phyllis&rft.date=2005-03-01&rft.pub=Wiley&rft.issn=0022-4308&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=312&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Ftea.20055&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=16752741 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-4308&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-4308&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-4308&client=summon |