Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between 3-field and modern 2-field lymph node dissections for thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

Our goal was to compare short- and long-term outcomes between 3-field lymphadenectomy (3-FL) and modern 2-field lymphadenectomy (2-FL) in patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We reviewed clinical outcomes for 298 patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 434 - 441
Main Authors Fan, Ningbo, Yang, Han, Zheng, Jiabo, Chen, Dongni, Wang, Weidong, Tan, Zihui, Huang, Yuanheng, Lin, Peng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.09.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Our goal was to compare short- and long-term outcomes between 3-field lymphadenectomy (3-FL) and modern 2-field lymphadenectomy (2-FL) in patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We reviewed clinical outcomes for 298 patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent 3-FL or modern 2-FL from March 2008 to December 2013 at a major cancer hospital in Guangzhou, southern China. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline differences, and 83 pairs of cases were selected. Postoperative complications, recurrence patterns and survival outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Compared with modern 2-FL, 3-FL led to higher overall operative morbidity rates [78.3% vs 61.4%, odds ratio (OR) 2.266, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.143-4.490; P = 0.019], with higher recurrent nerve palsy rates (47.0% vs 19.3%, OR 3.712, 95% CI 1.852-7.438; P < 0.0001), more respiratory failures (18.1% vs 6.0%, OR 3.441, 95% CI 1.189-9.963; P = 0.023) and longer postoperative hospital stays (23 vs 17 days, P = 0.002). The 5-year overall survival rate (58.5% vs 59.4%; P = 0.960) and the 5-year disease-free survival rate 50.1% vs 54.5%; P = 0.482) were comparable between the 2 groups. Multivariable analysis showed that additional cervical lymph node dissection was not associated with overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.039, 95% CI 0.637-1.696; P = 0.878] and disease-free survival (HR 0.868, 95% CI 0.548-1.376; P = 0.547). The overall recurrence rate and cervical nodal recurrence rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Additional cervical lymphadenectomy did not lead to added survival benefit when compared with modern 2-FL in patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Recurrence was similar in patients undergoing 3-FL and modern 2-FL. 3-FL resulted in more postoperative complications.
AbstractList Our goal was to compare short- and long-term outcomes between 3-field lymphadenectomy (3-FL) and modern 2-field lymphadenectomy (2-FL) in patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We reviewed clinical outcomes for 298 patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent 3-FL or modern 2-FL from March 2008 to December 2013 at a major cancer hospital in Guangzhou, southern China. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline differences, and 83 pairs of cases were selected. Postoperative complications, recurrence patterns and survival outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Compared with modern 2-FL, 3-FL led to higher overall operative morbidity rates [78.3% vs 61.4%, odds ratio (OR) 2.266, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.143-4.490; P = 0.019], with higher recurrent nerve palsy rates (47.0% vs 19.3%, OR 3.712, 95% CI 1.852-7.438; P < 0.0001), more respiratory failures (18.1% vs 6.0%, OR 3.441, 95% CI 1.189-9.963; P = 0.023) and longer postoperative hospital stays (23 vs 17 days, P = 0.002). The 5-year overall survival rate (58.5% vs 59.4%; P = 0.960) and the 5-year disease-free survival rate 50.1% vs 54.5%; P = 0.482) were comparable between the 2 groups. Multivariable analysis showed that additional cervical lymph node dissection was not associated with overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.039, 95% CI 0.637-1.696; P = 0.878] and disease-free survival (HR 0.868, 95% CI 0.548-1.376; P = 0.547). The overall recurrence rate and cervical nodal recurrence rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Additional cervical lymphadenectomy did not lead to added survival benefit when compared with modern 2-FL in patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Recurrence was similar in patients undergoing 3-FL and modern 2-FL. 3-FL resulted in more postoperative complications.
Our goal was to compare short- and long-term outcomes between 3-field lymphadenectomy (3-FL) and modern 2-field lymphadenectomy (2-FL) in patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.OBJECTIVESOur goal was to compare short- and long-term outcomes between 3-field lymphadenectomy (3-FL) and modern 2-field lymphadenectomy (2-FL) in patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.We reviewed clinical outcomes for 298 patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent 3-FL or modern 2-FL from March 2008 to December 2013 at a major cancer hospital in Guangzhou, southern China. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline differences, and 83 pairs of cases were selected. Postoperative complications, recurrence patterns and survival outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.METHODSWe reviewed clinical outcomes for 298 patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent 3-FL or modern 2-FL from March 2008 to December 2013 at a major cancer hospital in Guangzhou, southern China. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline differences, and 83 pairs of cases were selected. Postoperative complications, recurrence patterns and survival outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.Compared with modern 2-FL, 3-FL led to higher overall operative morbidity rates [78.3% vs 61.4%, odds ratio (OR) 2.266, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.143-4.490; P = 0.019], with higher recurrent nerve palsy rates (47.0% vs 19.3%, OR 3.712, 95% CI 1.852-7.438; P < 0.0001), more respiratory failures (18.1% vs 6.0%, OR 3.441, 95% CI 1.189-9.963; P = 0.023) and longer postoperative hospital stays (23 vs 17 days, P = 0.002). The 5-year overall survival rate (58.5% vs 59.4%; P = 0.960) and the 5-year disease-free survival rate 50.1% vs 54.5%; P = 0.482) were comparable between the 2 groups. Multivariable analysis showed that additional cervical lymph node dissection was not associated with overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.039, 95% CI 0.637-1.696; P = 0.878] and disease-free survival (HR 0.868, 95% CI 0.548-1.376; P = 0.547). The overall recurrence rate and cervical nodal recurrence rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups.RESULTSCompared with modern 2-FL, 3-FL led to higher overall operative morbidity rates [78.3% vs 61.4%, odds ratio (OR) 2.266, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.143-4.490; P = 0.019], with higher recurrent nerve palsy rates (47.0% vs 19.3%, OR 3.712, 95% CI 1.852-7.438; P < 0.0001), more respiratory failures (18.1% vs 6.0%, OR 3.441, 95% CI 1.189-9.963; P = 0.023) and longer postoperative hospital stays (23 vs 17 days, P = 0.002). The 5-year overall survival rate (58.5% vs 59.4%; P = 0.960) and the 5-year disease-free survival rate 50.1% vs 54.5%; P = 0.482) were comparable between the 2 groups. Multivariable analysis showed that additional cervical lymph node dissection was not associated with overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.039, 95% CI 0.637-1.696; P = 0.878] and disease-free survival (HR 0.868, 95% CI 0.548-1.376; P = 0.547). The overall recurrence rate and cervical nodal recurrence rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups.Additional cervical lymphadenectomy did not lead to added survival benefit when compared with modern 2-FL in patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Recurrence was similar in patients undergoing 3-FL and modern 2-FL. 3-FL resulted in more postoperative complications.CONCLUSIONSAdditional cervical lymphadenectomy did not lead to added survival benefit when compared with modern 2-FL in patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Recurrence was similar in patients undergoing 3-FL and modern 2-FL. 3-FL resulted in more postoperative complications.
Author Zheng, Jiabo
Tan, Zihui
Lin, Peng
Huang, Yuanheng
Wang, Weidong
Yang, Han
Fan, Ningbo
Chen, Dongni
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ningbo
  surname: Fan
  fullname: Fan, Ningbo
  organization: Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Han
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Han
  organization: Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jiabo
  surname: Zheng
  fullname: Zheng, Jiabo
  organization: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Dongni
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Dongni
  organization: Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Weidong
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1168-8803
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Weidong
  organization: Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Zihui
  surname: Tan
  fullname: Tan, Zihui
  organization: Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Yuanheng
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Yuanheng
  organization: Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Peng
  surname: Lin
  fullname: Lin, Peng
  organization: Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31135037$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkU1vFDEMhiNURD_gxhn5yIGhyWQ-uaEV0EqVuMB5lEmc3aBJMo0zRctv48cx210QQpxs2Y_tV34v2VmIARl7KfhbwXt57fRDpmv38EPw7gm7EHXTF33Z1Wd_5efskugb56Lnkj9j51IIWXPZXrCfm-hnlRzFANEC7WLKBahgYIphW2RMHuKSdfRIMGL-jhhAFtbhZB4xHw2mAOWpNO39vIOwFsE4ItTZxUBgY4K87lbaaYhIcd6pLaoJ6H5RPi4EGqcJtErahejVO1AwpzhjIJf3QDomBK-y3rmwXe-qaU-OnrOnVk2EL07xin39-OHL5qa4-_zpdvP-rtCybnOBdsRRjL20tbGitLZqK9NUVS2NNqibDteWbtrGtryruq5pK-RaN2WnWqM6Ja_Y6-PeVdL9gpQH7-ggWAVctQ9lKUshOtn3K_rqhC6jRzPMyXmV9sPvj6_AmyOgUyRKaP8ggg8HQ4dHQ4ejoSte_oNrl9XhqTkpN_1_6BcNf6xg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2147_IJGM_S480893
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_024_15176_1
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_794553
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtcvs_2022_08_009
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11174949
crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doae106
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_023_13748_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2020_05_057
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_08_029
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_thorsurg_2022_07_001
Cites_doi 10.1097/00000658-199409000-00012
10.1159/000226971
10.1002/ijc.29210
10.1097/00000658-199511000-00008
10.1245/s10434-013-3141-0
10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d3ccb2
10.1097/01.sla.0000118562.97742.29
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.06.050
10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00036-9
10.1002/cncr.11228
10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.18022
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817bbe59
10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70368-4
10.1097/00000658-200208000-00005
10.3322/caac.21338
10.1007/s00595-006-3413-4
10.1093/dote/11.1.28
10.1007/s11605-013-2411-2
10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00227-4
10.1016/0003-4975(91)91008-J
10.1097/SLA.0b013e318188c474
10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01541.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1093/icvts/ivz108
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1569-9285
EndPage 441
ExternalDocumentID 31135037
10_1093_icvts_ivz108
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
18M
29J
2WC
4.4
48X
5GY
AAFWJ
AAJKP
AAOGV
AAPXW
AAVAP
AAYXX
ABEJV
ABGNP
ABKDP
ABNKS
ABOCM
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABXVV
ABZBJ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADEYI
ADHKW
ADOCK
ADRTK
ADYVW
ADZXQ
AEGPL
AEJOX
AEKSI
AENEX
AEPUE
AFOFC
AGINJ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMNDL
AXUDD
BAWUL
BAYMD
BHONS
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EE~
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
F9B
GX1
H13
H5~
HZ~
KBUDW
KSI
O9-
OK1
OVT
O~Y
RNS
RPM
RXO
SV3
TEU
TJX
TOX
TR2
W8F
WOQ
XSB
ZCN
AAIYJ
ADJQC
ADRIX
AFULF
AFXEN
AWCFO
CGR
CUY
CVF
DPORF
DPPUQ
ECM
EIF
M~E
NPM
ROX
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-efbeb1b93f5df12ff474d64453dcdec68e93fc676f708488674e0cc628a7da8a3
ISSN 1569-9285
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 09:56:52 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:31:44 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:55:39 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:52:18 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Neck lymph node excision
Thoracic surgery
Oesophageal neoplasms
Language English
License https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c357t-efbeb1b93f5df12ff474d64453dcdec68e93fc676f708488674e0cc628a7da8a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-1168-8803
OpenAccessLink https://academic.oup.com/icvts/article-pdf/29/3/434/29217639/ivz108.pdf
PMID 31135037
PQID 2232118399
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2232118399
pubmed_primary_31135037
crossref_primary_10_1093_icvts_ivz108
crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_icvts_ivz108
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-09-01
20190901
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
PublicationYear 2019
References Tan (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B25) 2014; 18
(2019091012124772200_ivz108-B3) 2018
Lin (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B10) 2016; 19
Peyre (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B4) 2008; 248
Altorki (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B19) 1997; 113
Ye (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B21) 2013; 96
Kosugi (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B17) 2013; 20
Ferlay (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B1) 2015; 136
Altorki (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B18) 2002; 236
Ma (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B20) 2014; 20
Kuge (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B6) 2003; 125
Fujita (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B8) 1995; 222
Isono (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B7) 1991; 48
Bumm (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B16) 1995; 8
Nishihira (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B12) 1998; 175
Chen (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B2) 2016; 66
Igaki (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B24) 2004; 239
Kato (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B13) 1991; 51
Baba (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B15) 1998; 11
Akiyama (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B9) 1994; 220
Dresner (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B23) 2000; 87
Shim (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B11) 2010; 5
Nakamura (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B14) 2007; 37
Mariette (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B22) 2003; 97
Altorki (2019091012124772200_ivz108-B5) 2008; 248
References_xml – volume: 220
  start-page: 364
  year: 1994
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B9
  article-title: Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-199409000-00012
– volume: 48
  start-page: 411
  year: 1991
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B7
  article-title: Results of a nationwide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer
  publication-title: Oncology
  doi: 10.1159/000226971
– volume: 136
  start-page: E359
  year: 2015
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B1
  article-title: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012
  publication-title: Int J Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210
– volume: 222
  start-page: 654
  year: 1995
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B8
  article-title: Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-199511000-00008
– volume: 8
  start-page: 78
  year: 1995
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B16
  article-title: More or less surgery for esophageal cancer: extent of lymphadenectomy in esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal carcinoma: how much is necessary?
  publication-title: Dis Esophagus
– volume: 20
  start-page: 4016
  year: 2013
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B17
  article-title: Cervical lymph node dissection for clinically submucosal carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3141-0
– volume: 5
  start-page: 707
  year: 2010
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B11
  article-title: Comparison of survival and recurrence pattern between two-field and three-field lymph node dissections for upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  publication-title: J Thorac Oncol
  doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d3ccb2
– volume: 239
  start-page: 483
  year: 2004
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B24
  article-title: Improved survival for patients with upper and/or middle mediastinal lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with 3-field dissection
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000118562.97742.29
– volume: 96
  start-page: 1933
  year: 2013
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B21
  article-title: Three-field or two-field resection for thoracic esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.06.050
– volume: 125
  start-page: 1343
  year: 2003
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B6
  article-title: Submucosal territory of the direct lymphatic drainage system to the thoracic duct in the human esophagus
  publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00036-9
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1616
  year: 2003
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B22
  article-title: Pattern of recurrence following complete resection of esophageal carcinoma and factors predictive of recurrent disease
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.11228
– volume: 20
  start-page: 18022
  year: 2014
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B20
  article-title: Three-field vs two-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: World J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.18022
– year: 2018
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B3
– volume: 248
  start-page: 221
  year: 2008
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B5
  article-title: Total number of resected lymph nodes predicts survival in esophageal cancer
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817bbe59
– volume: 113
  start-page: 540
  year: 1997
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B19
  article-title: Occult cervical nodal metastasis in esophageal cancer: preliminary results of three-field lymphadenectomy
  publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70368-4
– volume: 236
  start-page: 177
  year: 2002
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B18
  article-title: Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-200208000-00005
– volume: 66
  start-page: 115
  year: 2016
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B2
  article-title: Cancer statistics in china, 2015
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21338
– volume: 37
  start-page: 379
  year: 2007
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B14
  article-title: Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction after 2-field versus 3-field lymph node dissection in patients with esophageal cancer
  publication-title: Surg Today
  doi: 10.1007/s00595-006-3413-4
– volume: 11
  start-page: 28
  year: 1998
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B15
  article-title: Quality of life following esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma, focusing on its relationship to vocal cord palsy
  publication-title: Dis Esophagus
  doi: 10.1093/dote/11.1.28
– volume: 18
  start-page: 187
  year: 2014
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B25
  article-title: Impact of thoracic recurrent laryngeal node dissection: 508 patients with tri-incisional esophagectomy
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2411-2
– volume: 19
  start-page: 990
  year: 2016
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B10
  article-title: Efficacy comparison between two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai ke za Zhi
– volume: 175
  start-page: 47
  year: 1998
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B12
  article-title: A prospective randomized trial of extended cervical and superior mediastinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus
  publication-title: Am J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00227-4
– volume: 51
  start-page: 931
  year: 1991
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B13
  article-title: Evaluation of neck lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal carcinoma
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(91)91008-J
– volume: 248
  start-page: 549
  year: 2008
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B4
  article-title: The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318188c474
– volume: 87
  start-page: 1426
  year: 2000
  ident: 2019091012124772200_ivz108-B23
  article-title: Pattern of recurrence following radical oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01541.x
SSID ssj0019030
Score 2.26309
Snippet Our goal was to compare short- and long-term outcomes between 3-field lymphadenectomy (3-FL) and modern 2-field lymphadenectomy (2-FL) in patients with...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 434
SubjectTerms China - epidemiology
Disease-Free Survival
Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - mortality
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - secondary
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - surgery
Esophagectomy - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Neck Dissection - methods
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Propensity Score
Survival Rate - trends
Time Factors
Title Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between 3-field and modern 2-field lymph node dissections for thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31135037
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2232118399
Volume 29
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEF6FcuGCingFChokOFlus2t7bXNDoVGESntJpIiLtV6vqaXULiSpRH8bZ34Xsw8_EK1UuFjRZrO2_H0Zz46_mSHkrcxTpvKS-2lUBn5IZeInTB8K9CUS9JNCprORP5_y-TL8tIpWo9GvgWppt80P5fWNeSX_gyqOIa46S_YfkO0WxQH8jPjiERHG450wng6bCHqbc3SlffM2YN3UX31tdL1mt8Uzq00nyAp8I1oz0y5sIzTmhtY_EFqvxkHPvKaXViVnhYhIFVlJr1G67wEaIZ1n8m0ndOTA09F_XeNaVnVzIWz-9KWO8tdG8bHRpTI9dI2tblO4OihDv9gEJoWxvXqhoUTWSjzd6TeDLG5TQtKmi-GyedMZMBcCn_fE_3KunPK4Ev3EqctM-Yh3q66G8Q_aC7w6k81TP2W28c-humHM2XkXWamGYQBjtEMbTv3rYWILbVXySgtaZtXVNZ0k_WOzlQqcnmWz5clJtjheLe6R-wy3K9reLs5W3dusdGJ63nRX5RIwcP0js_qRXftP1-iW_Y7xexb75KHbsMAHy75HZKTqx-RnzzxoSrDMA0QKOuZByzxwzAPHPDPNMg8c88AwDzTzYMA8QOZBCz0MmAct80AzDzrmvQcBPe_A8A5a3kHLuydkOTteTOe-6wPiyyCKt74qc_Qo8jQoo6KkrCzDOCzQj4-CQhZK8kThV5LHvIx1d4iEx6GaSMlZIuJCJCJ4SvbqplbPCUj07wUri0iFPKSpSksqIlYwSmMueUrHxGshyKQrkq97tawzK9YIMgNYZgEbk3fd7EtbHOaWeW9aNDO03vrWiFrhXcrQOcdz4yYlHZNnFuZupYDSIJoE8Ys7_PoledD_Nw7I3vb7Tr1Cb3mbvzZU_A1AEtE7
linkProvider Oxford University Press
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+short-+and+long-term+outcomes+between+3-field+and+modern+2-field+lymph+node+dissections+for+thoracic+oesophageal+squamous+cell+carcinoma%3A+a+propensity+score+matching+analysis&rft.jtitle=Interactive+cardiovascular+and+thoracic+surgery&rft.au=Fan%2C+Ningbo&rft.au=Yang%2C+Han&rft.au=Zheng%2C+Jiabo&rft.au=Chen%2C+Dongni&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.issn=1569-9285&rft.eissn=1569-9285&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Ficvts%2Fivz108&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1569-9285&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1569-9285&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1569-9285&client=summon