Characterization of Adrenal Lesions on Unenhanced MRI Using Texture Analysis: A Machine‐Learning Approach

Background Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid‐rich (LRA) or lipid‐poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 48; no. 1; pp. 198 - 204
Main Authors Romeo, Valeria, Maurea, Simone, Cuocolo, Renato, Petretta, Mario, Mainenti, Pier Paolo, Verde, Francesco, Coppola, Milena, Dell'Aversana, Serena, Brunetti, Arturo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.07.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1053-1807
1522-2586
1522-2586
DOI10.1002/jmri.25954

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid‐rich (LRA) or lipid‐poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis (TA) can extract quantitative parameters from MR images. Machine learning is a technique for recognizing patterns that can be applied to medical images by identifying the best combination of TA features to create a predictive model for the diagnosis of interest. Purpose/Hypothesis To assess the diagnostic efficacy of TA‐derived parameters extracted from MR images in characterizing LRA, LPA, and NAL using a machine‐learning approach. Study Type Retrospective, observational study. Population/Subjects/Phantom/Specimen/Animal Model Sixty MR examinations, including 20 LRA, 20 LPA, and 20 NAL. Field Strength/Sequence Unenhanced T1‐weighted in‐phase (IP) and out‐of‐phase (OP) as well as T2‐weighted (T2‐w) MR images acquired at 3T. Assessment Adrenal lesions were manually segmented, placing a spherical volume of interest on IP, OP, and T2‐w images. Different selection methods were trained and tested using the J48 machine‐learning classifiers. Statistical Tests The feature selection method that obtained the highest diagnostic performance using the J48 classifier was identified; the diagnostic performance was also compared with that of a senior radiologist by means of McNemar's test. Results A total of 138 TA‐derived features were extracted; among these, four features were selected, extracted from the IP (Short_Run_High_Gray_Level_Emphasis), OP (Mean_Intensity and Maximum_3D_Diameter), and T2‐w (Standard_Deviation) images; the J48 classifier obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The expert radiologist obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. McNemar's test did not show significant differences in terms of diagnostic performance between the J48 classifier and the expert radiologist. Data Conclusion Machine learning conducted on MR TA‐derived features is a potential tool to characterize adrenal lesions. Level of Evidence: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
AbstractList Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid-rich (LRA) or lipid-poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis (TA) can extract quantitative parameters from MR images. Machine learning is a technique for recognizing patterns that can be applied to medical images by identifying the best combination of TA features to create a predictive model for the diagnosis of interest.BACKGROUNDAdrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid-rich (LRA) or lipid-poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis (TA) can extract quantitative parameters from MR images. Machine learning is a technique for recognizing patterns that can be applied to medical images by identifying the best combination of TA features to create a predictive model for the diagnosis of interest.To assess the diagnostic efficacy of TA-derived parameters extracted from MR images in characterizing LRA, LPA, and NAL using a machine-learning approach.PURPOSE/HYPOTHESISTo assess the diagnostic efficacy of TA-derived parameters extracted from MR images in characterizing LRA, LPA, and NAL using a machine-learning approach.Retrospective, observational study.STUDY TYPERetrospective, observational study.Sixty MR examinations, including 20 LRA, 20 LPA, and 20 NAL.POPULATION/SUBJECTS/PHANTOM/SPECIMEN/ANIMAL MODELSixty MR examinations, including 20 LRA, 20 LPA, and 20 NAL.Unenhanced T1 -weighted in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) as well as T2 -weighted (T2 -w) MR images acquired at 3T.FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCEUnenhanced T1 -weighted in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) as well as T2 -weighted (T2 -w) MR images acquired at 3T.Adrenal lesions were manually segmented, placing a spherical volume of interest on IP, OP, and T2 -w images. Different selection methods were trained and tested using the J48 machine-learning classifiers.ASSESSMENTAdrenal lesions were manually segmented, placing a spherical volume of interest on IP, OP, and T2 -w images. Different selection methods were trained and tested using the J48 machine-learning classifiers.The feature selection method that obtained the highest diagnostic performance using the J48 classifier was identified; the diagnostic performance was also compared with that of a senior radiologist by means of McNemar's test.STATISTICAL TESTSThe feature selection method that obtained the highest diagnostic performance using the J48 classifier was identified; the diagnostic performance was also compared with that of a senior radiologist by means of McNemar's test.A total of 138 TA-derived features were extracted; among these, four features were selected, extracted from the IP (Short_Run_High_Gray_Level_Emphasis), OP (Mean_Intensity and Maximum_3D_Diameter), and T2 -w (Standard_Deviation) images; the J48 classifier obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The expert radiologist obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. McNemar's test did not show significant differences in terms of diagnostic performance between the J48 classifier and the expert radiologist.RESULTSA total of 138 TA-derived features were extracted; among these, four features were selected, extracted from the IP (Short_Run_High_Gray_Level_Emphasis), OP (Mean_Intensity and Maximum_3D_Diameter), and T2 -w (Standard_Deviation) images; the J48 classifier obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The expert radiologist obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. McNemar's test did not show significant differences in terms of diagnostic performance between the J48 classifier and the expert radiologist.Machine learning conducted on MR TA-derived features is a potential tool to characterize adrenal lesions.DATA CONCLUSIONMachine learning conducted on MR TA-derived features is a potential tool to characterize adrenal lesions.4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
Background Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid‐rich (LRA) or lipid‐poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis (TA) can extract quantitative parameters from MR images. Machine learning is a technique for recognizing patterns that can be applied to medical images by identifying the best combination of TA features to create a predictive model for the diagnosis of interest. Purpose/Hypothesis To assess the diagnostic efficacy of TA‐derived parameters extracted from MR images in characterizing LRA, LPA, and NAL using a machine‐learning approach. Study Type Retrospective, observational study. Population/Subjects/Phantom/Specimen/Animal Model Sixty MR examinations, including 20 LRA, 20 LPA, and 20 NAL. Field Strength/Sequence Unenhanced T1‐weighted in‐phase (IP) and out‐of‐phase (OP) as well as T2‐weighted (T2‐w) MR images acquired at 3T. Assessment Adrenal lesions were manually segmented, placing a spherical volume of interest on IP, OP, and T2‐w images. Different selection methods were trained and tested using the J48 machine‐learning classifiers. Statistical Tests The feature selection method that obtained the highest diagnostic performance using the J48 classifier was identified; the diagnostic performance was also compared with that of a senior radiologist by means of McNemar's test. Results A total of 138 TA‐derived features were extracted; among these, four features were selected, extracted from the IP (Short_Run_High_Gray_Level_Emphasis), OP (Mean_Intensity and Maximum_3D_Diameter), and T2‐w (Standard_Deviation) images; the J48 classifier obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The expert radiologist obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. McNemar's test did not show significant differences in terms of diagnostic performance between the J48 classifier and the expert radiologist. Data Conclusion Machine learning conducted on MR TA‐derived features is a potential tool to characterize adrenal lesions. Level of Evidence: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
BackgroundAdrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid‐rich (LRA) or lipid‐poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis (TA) can extract quantitative parameters from MR images. Machine learning is a technique for recognizing patterns that can be applied to medical images by identifying the best combination of TA features to create a predictive model for the diagnosis of interest.Purpose/HypothesisTo assess the diagnostic efficacy of TA‐derived parameters extracted from MR images in characterizing LRA, LPA, and NAL using a machine‐learning approach.Study TypeRetrospective, observational study.Population/Subjects/Phantom/Specimen/Animal ModelSixty MR examinations, including 20 LRA, 20 LPA, and 20 NAL.Field Strength/SequenceUnenhanced T1‐weighted in‐phase (IP) and out‐of‐phase (OP) as well as T2‐weighted (T2‐w) MR images acquired at 3T.AssessmentAdrenal lesions were manually segmented, placing a spherical volume of interest on IP, OP, and T2‐w images. Different selection methods were trained and tested using the J48 machine‐learning classifiers.Statistical TestsThe feature selection method that obtained the highest diagnostic performance using the J48 classifier was identified; the diagnostic performance was also compared with that of a senior radiologist by means of McNemar's test.ResultsA total of 138 TA‐derived features were extracted; among these, four features were selected, extracted from the IP (Short_Run_High_Gray_Level_Emphasis), OP (Mean_Intensity and Maximum_3D_Diameter), and T2‐w (Standard_Deviation) images; the J48 classifier obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The expert radiologist obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. McNemar's test did not show significant differences in terms of diagnostic performance between the J48 classifier and the expert radiologist.Data ConclusionMachine learning conducted on MR TA‐derived features is a potential tool to characterize adrenal lesions.Level of Evidence: 4Technical Efficacy: Stage 2J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid-rich (LRA) or lipid-poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis (TA) can extract quantitative parameters from MR images. Machine learning is a technique for recognizing patterns that can be applied to medical images by identifying the best combination of TA features to create a predictive model for the diagnosis of interest. To assess the diagnostic efficacy of TA-derived parameters extracted from MR images in characterizing LRA, LPA, and NAL using a machine-learning approach. Retrospective, observational study. Sixty MR examinations, including 20 LRA, 20 LPA, and 20 NAL. Unenhanced T -weighted in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) as well as T -weighted (T -w) MR images acquired at 3T. Adrenal lesions were manually segmented, placing a spherical volume of interest on IP, OP, and T -w images. Different selection methods were trained and tested using the J48 machine-learning classifiers. The feature selection method that obtained the highest diagnostic performance using the J48 classifier was identified; the diagnostic performance was also compared with that of a senior radiologist by means of McNemar's test. A total of 138 TA-derived features were extracted; among these, four features were selected, extracted from the IP (Short_Run_High_Gray_Level_Emphasis), OP (Mean_Intensity and Maximum_3D_Diameter), and T -w (Standard_Deviation) images; the J48 classifier obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The expert radiologist obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. McNemar's test did not show significant differences in terms of diagnostic performance between the J48 classifier and the expert radiologist. Machine learning conducted on MR TA-derived features is a potential tool to characterize adrenal lesions. 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
Author Romeo, Valeria
Maurea, Simone
Mainenti, Pier Paolo
Coppola, Milena
Dell'Aversana, Serena
Cuocolo, Renato
Petretta, Mario
Verde, Francesco
Brunetti, Arturo
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Valeria
  surname: Romeo
  fullname: Romeo, Valeria
  organization: University of Naples “Federico II,”
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Simone
  surname: Maurea
  fullname: Maurea, Simone
  organization: University of Naples “Federico II,”
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Renato
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1452-1574
  surname: Cuocolo
  fullname: Cuocolo, Renato
  email: renato.cuocolo@unina.it
  organization: University of Naples “Federico II,”
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Mario
  surname: Petretta
  fullname: Petretta, Mario
  organization: University of Naples “Federico II,”
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Pier Paolo
  surname: Mainenti
  fullname: Mainenti, Pier Paolo
  organization: Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging of the National Research Council (CNR)
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Francesco
  surname: Verde
  fullname: Verde, Francesco
  organization: University of Naples “Federico II,”
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Milena
  surname: Coppola
  fullname: Coppola, Milena
  organization: University of Naples “Federico II,”
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Serena
  surname: Dell'Aversana
  fullname: Dell'Aversana, Serena
  organization: University of Naples “Federico II,”
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Arturo
  surname: Brunetti
  fullname: Brunetti, Arturo
  organization: University of Naples “Federico II,”
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29341325$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kdFO2zAYha0JNGi3mz0AssQNQgqzHTuJuYsqYKCiSRO9thznD3WXOp2daCtXPALPyJPMpd0uEOLK1vF3_l8-Z4T2XOcAoS-UnFFC2NfF0tszJqTgH9AhFYwlTBTZXrwTkSa0IPkBGoWwIIRIycVHdMBkymnKxCH6OZlrr00P3j7o3nYOdw0uaw9Ot3gKISoBR3XmwM21M1Dj2x_XeBasu8d38KcfPOAywutgwzku8a02c-vg-fFpCtq7DVauVr6L8ie03-g2wOfdOUazy4u7ybdk-v3qelJOE5OKnCd13jTCFEZIYjRnOa214cAyUqVEQpXSuilkIyTjkW8KyIsqrSrNs0LSjLIqHaOT7dy49tcAoVdLGwy0rXbQDUFRWciMxlyyiB6_Qhfd4ON3gmLxmQlOchGpox01VEuo1crbpfZr9S_GCJxuAeO7EDw0_xFK1KYjtelIvXQUYfIKNrZ_yb732rZvW-jW8tu2sH5nuLqJ7Ww9fwFC46Pw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_975183
crossref_primary_10_1186_s41747_019_0109_2
crossref_primary_10_1148_rycan_2020200011
crossref_primary_10_31893_multirev_2025218
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmpb_2019_105033
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_019_02371_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2021_04_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2021_109586
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mri_2019_05_017
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13244_019_0688_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canlet_2020_03_032
crossref_primary_10_1210_endrev_bnaa008
crossref_primary_10_1530_EJE_18_0608
crossref_primary_10_5114_pjr_2023_124435
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_220101
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_26817
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00234_019_02266_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canlet_2019_12_007
crossref_primary_10_29137_umagd_1215882
crossref_primary_10_1177_1460458219899210
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14030569
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_020_00336_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2019_05_006
crossref_primary_10_35711_aimi_v1_i3_87
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2018_12_025
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_022_00759_9
crossref_primary_10_1002_ima_22358
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41574_021_00543_9
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v25_i35_5233
crossref_primary_10_1097_RCT_0000000000001018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmpb_2020_105343
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2020_02_028
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2020_00491
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mri_2021_03_009
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12553_020_00449_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_07027_w
crossref_primary_10_4274_balkanmedj_galenos_2022_2022_11_51
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_019_00246_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2019_06_021
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15143736
crossref_primary_10_3390_tomography7040079
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_18_20097
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13246_023_01259_y
crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_RVW_21_00142
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12030578
crossref_primary_10_1210_endrev_bnac034
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_021_03161_1
crossref_primary_10_1039_D2NA00608A
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diii_2022_09_003
Cites_doi 10.1259/bjr.20140369
10.1002/jmri.22095
10.1148/radiology.197.2.7480685
10.2214/AJR.05.0179
10.2214/AJR.14.12941
10.1148/rg.2017160130
10.3174/ajnr.A4110
10.1148/radiol.2283020878
10.2214/AJR.07.2799
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015
10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30158-8
10.1002/jmri.22728
10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.88
10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001
10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2<242::AID-JMRI1035>3.0.CO;2-#
10.2214/ajr.173.1.10397092
10.1007/s11547-006-0065-9
10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.12.010
10.1002/jmri.25452
10.1007/s00330-015-3845-6
10.2214/AJR.07.3150
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
– notice: 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7QO
7TK
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1002/jmri.25954
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1522-2586
EndPage 204
ExternalDocumentID 29341325
10_1002_jmri_25954
JMRI25954
Genre article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
24P
31~
33P
3O-
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABOCM
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
H.X
HBH
HDBZQ
HF~
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HVGLF
HZ~
IX1
J0M
JPC
KBYEO
KQQ
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M65
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
RGB
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RWI
RX1
RYL
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TWZ
UB1
V2E
V8K
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIB
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XV2
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
NPM
7QO
7TK
8FD
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-d7ff5c8c590ca4271dac4e260b309eb31df89f5924c35f8e78b3bba46891612b3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1053-1807
1522-2586
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 23:39:58 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 12:12:50 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:35:40 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:56:39 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:19 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:20:01 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords magnetic resonance imaging
machine learning
adrenal glands
texture analysis
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3574-d7ff5c8c590ca4271dac4e260b309eb31df89f5924c35f8e78b3bba46891612b3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-1452-1574
PMID 29341325
PQID 2063254075
PQPubID 1006400
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1989611806
proquest_journals_2063254075
pubmed_primary_29341325
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_25954
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_jmri_25954
wiley_primary_10_1002_jmri_25954_JMRI25954
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate July 2018
2018-07-00
20180701
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2018
  text: July 2018
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Nashville
PublicationSubtitle JMRI
PublicationTitle Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
PublicationTitleAlternate J Magn Reson Imaging
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2008; 191
2010; 11
2008; 190
2010; 31
2015; 36
2006; 31
2015; 204
2011
2017; 45
1995; 197
2012; 35
2013; 5
2006; 111
2014; 87
2012; 30
2012; 198
2003; 228
2017; 37
2017; 16
2006; 187
1999; 173
2016
2001; 13
2016; 26
2010; 73
e_1_2_5_25_1
e_1_2_5_26_1
e_1_2_5_23_1
e_1_2_5_24_1
e_1_2_5_22_1
Blake MA (e_1_2_5_9_1) 2012; 198
e_1_2_5_15_1
e_1_2_5_14_1
e_1_2_5_17_1
Bouckaert RR (e_1_2_5_21_1) 2010; 11
e_1_2_5_16_1
e_1_2_5_8_1
e_1_2_5_11_1
e_1_2_5_7_1
e_1_2_5_10_1
e_1_2_5_6_1
e_1_2_5_13_1
Frank E (e_1_2_5_19_1) 2016
e_1_2_5_5_1
e_1_2_5_12_1
e_1_2_5_4_1
e_1_2_5_3_1
e_1_2_5_2_1
e_1_2_5_18_1
Witten IH (e_1_2_5_20_1) 2011
References_xml – year: 2011
– volume: 5
  start-page: 88
  year: 2013
  end-page: 97
  article-title: Cross‐sectional imaging work‐up of adrenal masses
  publication-title: World J Radiol
– volume: 228
  start-page: 735
  year: 2003
  end-page: 742
  article-title: Adrenal masses: CT characterization with histogram analysis method
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 111
  start-page: 674
  year: 2006
  end-page: 686
  article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of chemical‐shift MR imaging to differentiate between adrenal adenomas and non adenoma adrenal lesions
  publication-title: Radiol Med
– volume: 204
  start-page: 536
  year: 2015
  end-page: 541
  article-title: Characterization of adrenal lesions at chemical‐shift MRI: A direct intraindividual comparison of in‐ and opposed‐phase imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
– volume: 35
  start-page: 95
  year: 2012
  end-page: 102
  article-title: Characterization of adrenal lesions using chemical shift MRI: Comparison between 1.5 Tesla and two echo time pair selection at 3.0 Tesla MRI
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
– volume: 87
  start-page: 20140369
  year: 2014
  article-title: The role of texture analysis in imaging as an outcome predictor and potential tool in radiotherapy treatment planning
  publication-title: Br J Radiol
– volume: 16
  start-page: 564
  year: 2017
  end-page: 570
  article-title: Gadolinium deposition in the brain: Summary of evidence and recommendations
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
– volume: 73
  start-page: 643
  year: 2010
  end-page: 651
  article-title: Differentiation of adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas using CT histogram analysis method: A prospective study
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
– volume: 173
  start-page: 15
  year: 1999
  end-page: 22
  article-title: Characterization of adrenal masses using MR imaging with histopatology correlation
  publication-title: Am J Roentgenol
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1195
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1203
  article-title: ADC histogram analysis for adrenal tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating adrenal adenoma from pheochromocytoma
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
– volume: 190
  start-page: 1163
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1168
  article-title: The incidental adrenal mass on CT: Prevalence of adrenal disease in 1,049 consecutive adrenal masses in patients with no known malignancy
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
– year: 2016
– volume: 13
  start-page: 242
  year: 2001
  end-page: 248
  article-title: Adrenal adenomas: Characteristic post‐gadolinium capillary blush on dynamic MR imaging
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
– volume: 197
  start-page: 411
  year: 1995
  end-page: 418
  article-title: Characterization of adrenal masses with chemical shift and gadolinium‐enhanced MR imaging
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 37
  start-page: 505
  year: 2017
  end-page: 515
  article-title: Machine learning for medical imaging
  publication-title: Radiographics
– volume: 11
  start-page: 2533
  year: 2010
  end-page: 2541
  article-title: WEKA‐experiences with a Java open‐source project
  publication-title: J Machine Learn Res
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1323
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1341
  article-title: 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network
  publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging
– volume: 187
  start-page: 191
  year: 2006
  end-page: 196
  article-title: CT histogram analysis in pathologically proven adrenal masses
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
– volume: 31
  start-page: 680
  year: 2010
  end-page: 689
  article-title: Machine learning study of several classifiers trained with texture analysis features to differentiate benign from malignant soft‐tissue tumors in T1‐MRI images
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
– volume: 198
  start-page: 1232
  year: 2012
  article-title: Adrenal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1450–1460
  publication-title: Erratum: AJR Am J Roentgenol
– volume: 191
  start-page: 234
  year: 2008
  end-page: 238
  article-title: Lipid‐poor adenomas on unenhanced CT: Does histogram analysis increase sensitivity compared with a mean attenuation threshold?
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
– volume: 36
  start-page: 166
  year: 2015
  end-page: 170
  article-title: MRI texture analysis predicts p53 status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
  publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1116
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1128
  article-title: User‐guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability
  publication-title: Neuroimage
– volume: 26
  start-page: 322
  year: 2016
  end-page: 330
  article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis classification of primary breast cancer
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
– volume-title: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_5_20_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_4_1
  doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140369
– ident: e_1_2_5_12_1
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.22095
– ident: e_1_2_5_24_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.2.7480685
– ident: e_1_2_5_8_1
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0179
– ident: e_1_2_5_26_1
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12941
– ident: e_1_2_5_11_1
  doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160130
– ident: e_1_2_5_14_1
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4110
– ident: e_1_2_5_5_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2283020878
– ident: e_1_2_5_2_1
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2799
– ident: e_1_2_5_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015
– ident: e_1_2_5_22_1
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30158-8
– ident: e_1_2_5_23_1
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.22728
– ident: e_1_2_5_3_1
  doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.88
– volume-title: The WEKA Workbench. Online Appendix for “Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques,”
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_5_19_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_18_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001
– ident: e_1_2_5_16_1
  doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2<242::AID-JMRI1035>3.0.CO;2-#
– ident: e_1_2_5_25_1
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.173.1.10397092
– ident: e_1_2_5_15_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0065-9
– volume: 11
  start-page: 2533
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_5_21_1
  article-title: WEKA‐experiences with a Java open‐source project
  publication-title: J Machine Learn Res
– ident: e_1_2_5_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.12.010
– ident: e_1_2_5_10_1
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.25452
– ident: e_1_2_5_13_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3845-6
– ident: e_1_2_5_6_1
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3150
– volume: 198
  start-page: 1232
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_5_9_1
  article-title: Adrenal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1450–1460
  publication-title: Erratum: AJR Am J Roentgenol
SSID ssj0009945
Score 2.47241
Snippet Background Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid‐rich (LRA)...
Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid-rich (LRA) or...
BackgroundAdrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid‐rich (LRA)...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 198
SubjectTerms adrenal glands
Artificial intelligence
Classifiers
Diagnostic systems
Feature extraction
Field strength
Image acquisition
Learning algorithms
Lesions
Machine learning
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical imaging
Neuroendocrine tumors
Object recognition
Parameters
Pattern recognition
Population (statistical)
Population studies
Statistical analysis
Statistical tests
Texture
texture analysis
Title Characterization of Adrenal Lesions on Unenhanced MRI Using Texture Analysis: A Machine‐Learning Approach
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjmri.25954
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29341325
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2063254075
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1989611806
Volume 48
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1JS8QwFMeDeBAv7su4EdGLQscuSZuIl0EcVBwP4oAXKUmbuIx2ZJaLJz-Cn9FP4ku6DKMi6K20L6RN8tJ_kpdfENr1GdMkSF1Ha0EdwhVzGBGuw4lOuKBUUcvZbl2Gp21yfkNvJtBRuRcm50NUE27GM2x_bRxcyP7BCBr6-Nx7qIN4pwYGaoK1jCK6GrGjOLcnFIN-CByPuVHFJvUPRknH_0bfJOa4YrW_nOYsui1fNo806dSHA1lPXr9wHP_7NXNoptCiuJE3nnk0obIFNNUqVtsXUee4ojnnmzVxV-OG2foNqS6UmWfrY7jbzlR2byMJcOvqDNsoBHwNvf6wp3BJPTnEDdyykZvq4-29wLre4UbBNF9C7ebJ9fGpUxzO4CQBjYiTRlrThCWUu4kgfuSlIiEKRkcycDmM0L1UM64pDO_AXjMVMRlIKUjIQJB6vgyW0WTWzdQqwsKL0khoyUJJiFae5EKEQUpAvIB6S2kN7ZWVFCcFudwcoPEU58xlPzalF9vSq6GdyvYl53X8aLVR1nVc-Gw_9kGt-YZHCBluV4_B28wSishUd9iPTYRZaKh5YQ2t5G2kygaEEygCH1Lv25r-Jf_4HKrDXq39xXgdTYNeY3m08AaaHPSGahM00UBu2bb_CQsNCG4
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1JT9wwFMctChLtha0Lw-oKLlTKkMVObG4jFg10wgHNSNwsO7ELpWTQLBdOfAQ-I5-EZyeTEVAhtbcosWXF9rP_tp9_D6HdkDFDotz3jJHUI1wzjxHpe5yYjEtKNXWc7fQ8bvfI2SW9rHxz7F2Ykg9Rb7hZy3DjtTVwuyG9P6WG_r4dXDdBvVPyAc3ZkN42gMHRxZQexbmLUQwKIvIC5ic1nTTcn-Z9OR-9EZkvNaubdE4Wy8iqQ8cqtL4mN83xSDWz-1ckx__-nyW0UMlR3Cr7zzKa0cUKmk-rA_fP6OawBjqX9zVx3-CWvf0NuTrabrUNMbztFbq4cs4EOL04xc4RAXdh4B8PNJ6ATw5wC6fOeVM_PTxWZNdfuFVhzb-g3slx97DtVfEZvCyiCfHyxBiasYxyP5MkTIJcZkTDAklFPodFepAbxg2FFR6kN0wnTEVKSRIz0KRBqKKvaLboF3oVYRkkeSKNYrEixOhAcSnjKCegX0DA5bSB9iatJLIKXm5jaPwRJXY5FLb2hKu9Btqp096VyI6_ptqYNLaozHYoQhBsoUUSQoHf689gcPYURRa6Px4K62QWW3Be3EDfyk5SFwPaCURBCLl_uKZ-p3xxBs3hntb-JfE2-tjuph3ROT3_uY4-gXxjpfPwBpodDcZ6EyTSSG05Q3gGfF0MiA
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1bTxQxFMdPEBPiC-INV0Br9EWTWebSzrSElw26AWSJIWzCi2namVYUmCV7eeGJj8Bn5JNw2rlsUGOib5OZ03Sm7en8257-CvA-5tzSpAgDaxULqDA84FSFgaA2F4oxwzxne3CY7g7p_gk7WYDtZi9MxYdoJ9ycZ_j-2jn4ZWE359DQnxfjH10U74w-gIc0RW9xkuhoDo8Swh9RjAIiCSIeZi2cNN6cp73_O_pNY96XrP6f038M35q3rUJNzrqzqe7mV7-AHP_3c1ZguRajpFe1niewYMqnsDSol9ufwdlOi3OudmuSkSU9t_cbUx0YN9E2IXh3WJry1IcSkMHRHvFhCOQYu_3Z2JAGe7JFemTgQzfN7fVNzXX9Tno11Pw5DPufj3d2g_p0hiBPWEaDIrOW5TxnIswVjbOoUDk1ODzSSShwiB4VlgvLcHyH9pabjOtEa0VTjoo0inXyAhbLUWleAlFRVmTKap5qSq2JtFAqTQqK6gXlW8E68KGpJJnX6HJ3gsa5rKDLsXSlJ33pdeBda3tZATv-aLXe1LWsnXYiY5RrsQMSYoZv28fobm4NRZVmNJtIF2KWOmxe2oHVqo202aByQkkQY-qPvqb_kr_cx-rwV6_-xfgNLH391JcHe4df1uARajdeRQ6vw-J0PDMbqI-m-rV3gztwBgtA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization+of+Adrenal+Lesions+on+Unenhanced+MRI+Using+Texture+Analysis%3A+A+Machine%E2%80%90Learning+Approach&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+magnetic+resonance+imaging&rft.au=Romeo%2C+Valeria&rft.au=Maurea%2C+Simone&rft.au=Cuocolo%2C+Renato&rft.au=Petretta%2C+Mario&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=204&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjmri.25954&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fjmri.25954&rft.externalDocID=JMRI25954
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon