Characterization of Adrenal Lesions on Unenhanced MRI Using Texture Analysis: A Machine‐Learning Approach
Background Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid‐rich (LRA) or lipid‐poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 48; no. 1; pp. 198 - 204 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.07.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1053-1807 1522-2586 1522-2586 |
DOI | 10.1002/jmri.25954 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid‐rich (LRA) or lipid‐poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis (TA) can extract quantitative parameters from MR images. Machine learning is a technique for recognizing patterns that can be applied to medical images by identifying the best combination of TA features to create a predictive model for the diagnosis of interest.
Purpose/Hypothesis
To assess the diagnostic efficacy of TA‐derived parameters extracted from MR images in characterizing LRA, LPA, and NAL using a machine‐learning approach.
Study Type
Retrospective, observational study.
Population/Subjects/Phantom/Specimen/Animal Model
Sixty MR examinations, including 20 LRA, 20 LPA, and 20 NAL.
Field Strength/Sequence
Unenhanced T1‐weighted in‐phase (IP) and out‐of‐phase (OP) as well as T2‐weighted (T2‐w) MR images acquired at 3T.
Assessment
Adrenal lesions were manually segmented, placing a spherical volume of interest on IP, OP, and T2‐w images. Different selection methods were trained and tested using the J48 machine‐learning classifiers.
Statistical Tests
The feature selection method that obtained the highest diagnostic performance using the J48 classifier was identified; the diagnostic performance was also compared with that of a senior radiologist by means of McNemar's test.
Results
A total of 138 TA‐derived features were extracted; among these, four features were selected, extracted from the IP (Short_Run_High_Gray_Level_Emphasis), OP (Mean_Intensity and Maximum_3D_Diameter), and T2‐w (Standard_Deviation) images; the J48 classifier obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The expert radiologist obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. McNemar's test did not show significant differences in terms of diagnostic performance between the J48 classifier and the expert radiologist.
Data Conclusion
Machine learning conducted on MR TA‐derived features is a potential tool to characterize adrenal lesions.
Level of Evidence: 4
Technical Efficacy: Stage 2
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid-rich (LRA) or lipid-poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis (TA) can extract quantitative parameters from MR images. Machine learning is a technique for recognizing patterns that can be applied to medical images by identifying the best combination of TA features to create a predictive model for the diagnosis of interest.BACKGROUNDAdrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid-rich (LRA) or lipid-poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis (TA) can extract quantitative parameters from MR images. Machine learning is a technique for recognizing patterns that can be applied to medical images by identifying the best combination of TA features to create a predictive model for the diagnosis of interest.To assess the diagnostic efficacy of TA-derived parameters extracted from MR images in characterizing LRA, LPA, and NAL using a machine-learning approach.PURPOSE/HYPOTHESISTo assess the diagnostic efficacy of TA-derived parameters extracted from MR images in characterizing LRA, LPA, and NAL using a machine-learning approach.Retrospective, observational study.STUDY TYPERetrospective, observational study.Sixty MR examinations, including 20 LRA, 20 LPA, and 20 NAL.POPULATION/SUBJECTS/PHANTOM/SPECIMEN/ANIMAL MODELSixty MR examinations, including 20 LRA, 20 LPA, and 20 NAL.Unenhanced T1 -weighted in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) as well as T2 -weighted (T2 -w) MR images acquired at 3T.FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCEUnenhanced T1 -weighted in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) as well as T2 -weighted (T2 -w) MR images acquired at 3T.Adrenal lesions were manually segmented, placing a spherical volume of interest on IP, OP, and T2 -w images. Different selection methods were trained and tested using the J48 machine-learning classifiers.ASSESSMENTAdrenal lesions were manually segmented, placing a spherical volume of interest on IP, OP, and T2 -w images. Different selection methods were trained and tested using the J48 machine-learning classifiers.The feature selection method that obtained the highest diagnostic performance using the J48 classifier was identified; the diagnostic performance was also compared with that of a senior radiologist by means of McNemar's test.STATISTICAL TESTSThe feature selection method that obtained the highest diagnostic performance using the J48 classifier was identified; the diagnostic performance was also compared with that of a senior radiologist by means of McNemar's test.A total of 138 TA-derived features were extracted; among these, four features were selected, extracted from the IP (Short_Run_High_Gray_Level_Emphasis), OP (Mean_Intensity and Maximum_3D_Diameter), and T2 -w (Standard_Deviation) images; the J48 classifier obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The expert radiologist obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. McNemar's test did not show significant differences in terms of diagnostic performance between the J48 classifier and the expert radiologist.RESULTSA total of 138 TA-derived features were extracted; among these, four features were selected, extracted from the IP (Short_Run_High_Gray_Level_Emphasis), OP (Mean_Intensity and Maximum_3D_Diameter), and T2 -w (Standard_Deviation) images; the J48 classifier obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The expert radiologist obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. McNemar's test did not show significant differences in terms of diagnostic performance between the J48 classifier and the expert radiologist.Machine learning conducted on MR TA-derived features is a potential tool to characterize adrenal lesions.DATA CONCLUSIONMachine learning conducted on MR TA-derived features is a potential tool to characterize adrenal lesions.4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018. Background Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid‐rich (LRA) or lipid‐poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis (TA) can extract quantitative parameters from MR images. Machine learning is a technique for recognizing patterns that can be applied to medical images by identifying the best combination of TA features to create a predictive model for the diagnosis of interest. Purpose/Hypothesis To assess the diagnostic efficacy of TA‐derived parameters extracted from MR images in characterizing LRA, LPA, and NAL using a machine‐learning approach. Study Type Retrospective, observational study. Population/Subjects/Phantom/Specimen/Animal Model Sixty MR examinations, including 20 LRA, 20 LPA, and 20 NAL. Field Strength/Sequence Unenhanced T1‐weighted in‐phase (IP) and out‐of‐phase (OP) as well as T2‐weighted (T2‐w) MR images acquired at 3T. Assessment Adrenal lesions were manually segmented, placing a spherical volume of interest on IP, OP, and T2‐w images. Different selection methods were trained and tested using the J48 machine‐learning classifiers. Statistical Tests The feature selection method that obtained the highest diagnostic performance using the J48 classifier was identified; the diagnostic performance was also compared with that of a senior radiologist by means of McNemar's test. Results A total of 138 TA‐derived features were extracted; among these, four features were selected, extracted from the IP (Short_Run_High_Gray_Level_Emphasis), OP (Mean_Intensity and Maximum_3D_Diameter), and T2‐w (Standard_Deviation) images; the J48 classifier obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The expert radiologist obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. McNemar's test did not show significant differences in terms of diagnostic performance between the J48 classifier and the expert radiologist. Data Conclusion Machine learning conducted on MR TA‐derived features is a potential tool to characterize adrenal lesions. Level of Evidence: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018. BackgroundAdrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid‐rich (LRA) or lipid‐poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis (TA) can extract quantitative parameters from MR images. Machine learning is a technique for recognizing patterns that can be applied to medical images by identifying the best combination of TA features to create a predictive model for the diagnosis of interest.Purpose/HypothesisTo assess the diagnostic efficacy of TA‐derived parameters extracted from MR images in characterizing LRA, LPA, and NAL using a machine‐learning approach.Study TypeRetrospective, observational study.Population/Subjects/Phantom/Specimen/Animal ModelSixty MR examinations, including 20 LRA, 20 LPA, and 20 NAL.Field Strength/SequenceUnenhanced T1‐weighted in‐phase (IP) and out‐of‐phase (OP) as well as T2‐weighted (T2‐w) MR images acquired at 3T.AssessmentAdrenal lesions were manually segmented, placing a spherical volume of interest on IP, OP, and T2‐w images. Different selection methods were trained and tested using the J48 machine‐learning classifiers.Statistical TestsThe feature selection method that obtained the highest diagnostic performance using the J48 classifier was identified; the diagnostic performance was also compared with that of a senior radiologist by means of McNemar's test.ResultsA total of 138 TA‐derived features were extracted; among these, four features were selected, extracted from the IP (Short_Run_High_Gray_Level_Emphasis), OP (Mean_Intensity and Maximum_3D_Diameter), and T2‐w (Standard_Deviation) images; the J48 classifier obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The expert radiologist obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. McNemar's test did not show significant differences in terms of diagnostic performance between the J48 classifier and the expert radiologist.Data ConclusionMachine learning conducted on MR TA‐derived features is a potential tool to characterize adrenal lesions.Level of Evidence: 4Technical Efficacy: Stage 2J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018. Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid-rich (LRA) or lipid-poor (LPA). The differentiation of AA, particularly LPA, from nonadenoma adrenal lesions (NAL) may be challenging. Texture analysis (TA) can extract quantitative parameters from MR images. Machine learning is a technique for recognizing patterns that can be applied to medical images by identifying the best combination of TA features to create a predictive model for the diagnosis of interest. To assess the diagnostic efficacy of TA-derived parameters extracted from MR images in characterizing LRA, LPA, and NAL using a machine-learning approach. Retrospective, observational study. Sixty MR examinations, including 20 LRA, 20 LPA, and 20 NAL. Unenhanced T -weighted in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) as well as T -weighted (T -w) MR images acquired at 3T. Adrenal lesions were manually segmented, placing a spherical volume of interest on IP, OP, and T -w images. Different selection methods were trained and tested using the J48 machine-learning classifiers. The feature selection method that obtained the highest diagnostic performance using the J48 classifier was identified; the diagnostic performance was also compared with that of a senior radiologist by means of McNemar's test. A total of 138 TA-derived features were extracted; among these, four features were selected, extracted from the IP (Short_Run_High_Gray_Level_Emphasis), OP (Mean_Intensity and Maximum_3D_Diameter), and T -w (Standard_Deviation) images; the J48 classifier obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 80%. The expert radiologist obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. McNemar's test did not show significant differences in terms of diagnostic performance between the J48 classifier and the expert radiologist. Machine learning conducted on MR TA-derived features is a potential tool to characterize adrenal lesions. 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018. |
Author | Romeo, Valeria Maurea, Simone Mainenti, Pier Paolo Coppola, Milena Dell'Aversana, Serena Cuocolo, Renato Petretta, Mario Verde, Francesco Brunetti, Arturo |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Valeria surname: Romeo fullname: Romeo, Valeria organization: University of Naples “Federico II,” – sequence: 2 givenname: Simone surname: Maurea fullname: Maurea, Simone organization: University of Naples “Federico II,” – sequence: 3 givenname: Renato orcidid: 0000-0002-1452-1574 surname: Cuocolo fullname: Cuocolo, Renato email: renato.cuocolo@unina.it organization: University of Naples “Federico II,” – sequence: 4 givenname: Mario surname: Petretta fullname: Petretta, Mario organization: University of Naples “Federico II,” – sequence: 5 givenname: Pier Paolo surname: Mainenti fullname: Mainenti, Pier Paolo organization: Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging of the National Research Council (CNR) – sequence: 6 givenname: Francesco surname: Verde fullname: Verde, Francesco organization: University of Naples “Federico II,” – sequence: 7 givenname: Milena surname: Coppola fullname: Coppola, Milena organization: University of Naples “Federico II,” – sequence: 8 givenname: Serena surname: Dell'Aversana fullname: Dell'Aversana, Serena organization: University of Naples “Federico II,” – sequence: 9 givenname: Arturo surname: Brunetti fullname: Brunetti, Arturo organization: University of Naples “Federico II,” |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29341325$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kdFO2zAYha0JNGi3mz0AssQNQgqzHTuJuYsqYKCiSRO9thznD3WXOp2daCtXPALPyJPMpd0uEOLK1vF3_l8-Z4T2XOcAoS-UnFFC2NfF0tszJqTgH9AhFYwlTBTZXrwTkSa0IPkBGoWwIIRIycVHdMBkymnKxCH6OZlrr00P3j7o3nYOdw0uaw9Ot3gKISoBR3XmwM21M1Dj2x_XeBasu8d38KcfPOAywutgwzku8a02c-vg-fFpCtq7DVauVr6L8ie03-g2wOfdOUazy4u7ybdk-v3qelJOE5OKnCd13jTCFEZIYjRnOa214cAyUqVEQpXSuilkIyTjkW8KyIsqrSrNs0LSjLIqHaOT7dy49tcAoVdLGwy0rXbQDUFRWciMxlyyiB6_Qhfd4ON3gmLxmQlOchGpox01VEuo1crbpfZr9S_GCJxuAeO7EDw0_xFK1KYjtelIvXQUYfIKNrZ_yb732rZvW-jW8tu2sH5nuLqJ7Ww9fwFC46Pw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_975183 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41747_019_0109_2 crossref_primary_10_1148_rycan_2020200011 crossref_primary_10_31893_multirev_2025218 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmpb_2019_105033 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_019_02371_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2021_04_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2021_109586 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mri_2019_05_017 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13244_019_0688_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canlet_2020_03_032 crossref_primary_10_1210_endrev_bnaa008 crossref_primary_10_1530_EJE_18_0608 crossref_primary_10_5114_pjr_2023_124435 crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_220101 crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_26817 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00234_019_02266_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canlet_2019_12_007 crossref_primary_10_29137_umagd_1215882 crossref_primary_10_1177_1460458219899210 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14030569 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_020_00336_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2019_05_006 crossref_primary_10_35711_aimi_v1_i3_87 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2018_12_025 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_022_00759_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_ima_22358 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41574_021_00543_9 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v25_i35_5233 crossref_primary_10_1097_RCT_0000000000001018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmpb_2020_105343 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2020_02_028 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2020_00491 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mri_2021_03_009 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12553_020_00449_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_07027_w crossref_primary_10_4274_balkanmedj_galenos_2022_2022_11_51 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_019_00246_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2019_06_021 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15143736 crossref_primary_10_3390_tomography7040079 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_18_20097 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13246_023_01259_y crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_RVW_21_00142 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12030578 crossref_primary_10_1210_endrev_bnac034 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_021_03161_1 crossref_primary_10_1039_D2NA00608A crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diii_2022_09_003 |
Cites_doi | 10.1259/bjr.20140369 10.1002/jmri.22095 10.1148/radiology.197.2.7480685 10.2214/AJR.05.0179 10.2214/AJR.14.12941 10.1148/rg.2017160130 10.3174/ajnr.A4110 10.1148/radiol.2283020878 10.2214/AJR.07.2799 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30158-8 10.1002/jmri.22728 10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.88 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2<242::AID-JMRI1035>3.0.CO;2-# 10.2214/ajr.173.1.10397092 10.1007/s11547-006-0065-9 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.12.010 10.1002/jmri.25452 10.1007/s00330-015-3845-6 10.2214/AJR.07.3150 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine – notice: 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7QO 7TK 8FD FR3 K9. P64 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1002/jmri.25954 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed Biotechnology Research Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Engineering Research Database Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Neurosciences Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1522-2586 |
EndPage | 204 |
ExternalDocumentID | 29341325 10_1002_jmri_25954 JMRI25954 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 24P 31~ 33P 3O- 3SF 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABLJU ABOCM ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACIWK ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AIAGR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBD EBS EJD EMOBN F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.X HBH HDBZQ HF~ HGLYW HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M JPC KBYEO KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M65 MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RGB RIWAO RJQFR ROL RWI RX1 RYL SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TWZ UB1 V2E V8K V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIB WIH WIJ WIK WIN WJL WOHZO WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 XV2 ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION NPM 7QO 7TK 8FD AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY FR3 K9. P64 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3574-d7ff5c8c590ca4271dac4e260b309eb31df89f5924c35f8e78b3bba46891612b3 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 23:39:58 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 12:12:50 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:35:40 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:56:39 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:19 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:20:01 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | magnetic resonance imaging machine learning adrenal glands texture analysis |
Language | English |
License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3574-d7ff5c8c590ca4271dac4e260b309eb31df89f5924c35f8e78b3bba46891612b3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-1452-1574 |
PMID | 29341325 |
PQID | 2063254075 |
PQPubID | 1006400 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1989611806 proquest_journals_2063254075 pubmed_primary_29341325 crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_25954 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_jmri_25954 wiley_primary_10_1002_jmri_25954_JMRI25954 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | July 2018 2018-07-00 20180701 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2018 text: July 2018 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Nashville |
PublicationSubtitle | JMRI |
PublicationTitle | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Magn Reson Imaging |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | 2008; 191 2010; 11 2008; 190 2010; 31 2015; 36 2006; 31 2015; 204 2011 2017; 45 1995; 197 2012; 35 2013; 5 2006; 111 2014; 87 2012; 30 2012; 198 2003; 228 2017; 37 2017; 16 2006; 187 1999; 173 2016 2001; 13 2016; 26 2010; 73 e_1_2_5_25_1 e_1_2_5_26_1 e_1_2_5_23_1 e_1_2_5_24_1 e_1_2_5_22_1 Blake MA (e_1_2_5_9_1) 2012; 198 e_1_2_5_15_1 e_1_2_5_14_1 e_1_2_5_17_1 Bouckaert RR (e_1_2_5_21_1) 2010; 11 e_1_2_5_16_1 e_1_2_5_8_1 e_1_2_5_11_1 e_1_2_5_7_1 e_1_2_5_10_1 e_1_2_5_6_1 e_1_2_5_13_1 Frank E (e_1_2_5_19_1) 2016 e_1_2_5_5_1 e_1_2_5_12_1 e_1_2_5_4_1 e_1_2_5_3_1 e_1_2_5_2_1 e_1_2_5_18_1 Witten IH (e_1_2_5_20_1) 2011 |
References_xml | – year: 2011 – volume: 5 start-page: 88 year: 2013 end-page: 97 article-title: Cross‐sectional imaging work‐up of adrenal masses publication-title: World J Radiol – volume: 228 start-page: 735 year: 2003 end-page: 742 article-title: Adrenal masses: CT characterization with histogram analysis method publication-title: Radiology – volume: 111 start-page: 674 year: 2006 end-page: 686 article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of chemical‐shift MR imaging to differentiate between adrenal adenomas and non adenoma adrenal lesions publication-title: Radiol Med – volume: 204 start-page: 536 year: 2015 end-page: 541 article-title: Characterization of adrenal lesions at chemical‐shift MRI: A direct intraindividual comparison of in‐ and opposed‐phase imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol – volume: 35 start-page: 95 year: 2012 end-page: 102 article-title: Characterization of adrenal lesions using chemical shift MRI: Comparison between 1.5 Tesla and two echo time pair selection at 3.0 Tesla MRI publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 87 start-page: 20140369 year: 2014 article-title: The role of texture analysis in imaging as an outcome predictor and potential tool in radiotherapy treatment planning publication-title: Br J Radiol – volume: 16 start-page: 564 year: 2017 end-page: 570 article-title: Gadolinium deposition in the brain: Summary of evidence and recommendations publication-title: Lancet Neurol – volume: 73 start-page: 643 year: 2010 end-page: 651 article-title: Differentiation of adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas using CT histogram analysis method: A prospective study publication-title: Eur J Radiol – volume: 173 start-page: 15 year: 1999 end-page: 22 article-title: Characterization of adrenal masses using MR imaging with histopatology correlation publication-title: Am J Roentgenol – volume: 45 start-page: 1195 year: 2017 end-page: 1203 article-title: ADC histogram analysis for adrenal tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating adrenal adenoma from pheochromocytoma publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 190 start-page: 1163 year: 2008 end-page: 1168 article-title: The incidental adrenal mass on CT: Prevalence of adrenal disease in 1,049 consecutive adrenal masses in patients with no known malignancy publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol – year: 2016 – volume: 13 start-page: 242 year: 2001 end-page: 248 article-title: Adrenal adenomas: Characteristic post‐gadolinium capillary blush on dynamic MR imaging publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 197 start-page: 411 year: 1995 end-page: 418 article-title: Characterization of adrenal masses with chemical shift and gadolinium‐enhanced MR imaging publication-title: Radiology – volume: 37 start-page: 505 year: 2017 end-page: 515 article-title: Machine learning for medical imaging publication-title: Radiographics – volume: 11 start-page: 2533 year: 2010 end-page: 2541 article-title: WEKA‐experiences with a Java open‐source project publication-title: J Machine Learn Res – volume: 30 start-page: 1323 year: 2012 end-page: 1341 article-title: 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 187 start-page: 191 year: 2006 end-page: 196 article-title: CT histogram analysis in pathologically proven adrenal masses publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol – volume: 31 start-page: 680 year: 2010 end-page: 689 article-title: Machine learning study of several classifiers trained with texture analysis features to differentiate benign from malignant soft‐tissue tumors in T1‐MRI images publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 198 start-page: 1232 year: 2012 article-title: Adrenal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1450–1460 publication-title: Erratum: AJR Am J Roentgenol – volume: 191 start-page: 234 year: 2008 end-page: 238 article-title: Lipid‐poor adenomas on unenhanced CT: Does histogram analysis increase sensitivity compared with a mean attenuation threshold? publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol – volume: 36 start-page: 166 year: 2015 end-page: 170 article-title: MRI texture analysis predicts p53 status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol – volume: 31 start-page: 1116 year: 2006 end-page: 1128 article-title: User‐guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability publication-title: Neuroimage – volume: 26 start-page: 322 year: 2016 end-page: 330 article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis classification of primary breast cancer publication-title: Eur Radiol – volume-title: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_5_20_1 – ident: e_1_2_5_4_1 doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140369 – ident: e_1_2_5_12_1 doi: 10.1002/jmri.22095 – ident: e_1_2_5_24_1 doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.2.7480685 – ident: e_1_2_5_8_1 doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0179 – ident: e_1_2_5_26_1 doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12941 – ident: e_1_2_5_11_1 doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160130 – ident: e_1_2_5_14_1 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4110 – ident: e_1_2_5_5_1 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2283020878 – ident: e_1_2_5_2_1 doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2799 – ident: e_1_2_5_17_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 – ident: e_1_2_5_22_1 doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30158-8 – ident: e_1_2_5_23_1 doi: 10.1002/jmri.22728 – ident: e_1_2_5_3_1 doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.88 – volume-title: The WEKA Workbench. Online Appendix for “Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques,” year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_5_19_1 – ident: e_1_2_5_18_1 doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 – ident: e_1_2_5_16_1 doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2<242::AID-JMRI1035>3.0.CO;2-# – ident: e_1_2_5_25_1 doi: 10.2214/ajr.173.1.10397092 – ident: e_1_2_5_15_1 doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0065-9 – volume: 11 start-page: 2533 year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_5_21_1 article-title: WEKA‐experiences with a Java open‐source project publication-title: J Machine Learn Res – ident: e_1_2_5_7_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.12.010 – ident: e_1_2_5_10_1 doi: 10.1002/jmri.25452 – ident: e_1_2_5_13_1 doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3845-6 – ident: e_1_2_5_6_1 doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3150 – volume: 198 start-page: 1232 year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_5_9_1 article-title: Adrenal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1450–1460 publication-title: Erratum: AJR Am J Roentgenol |
SSID | ssj0009945 |
Score | 2.47241 |
Snippet | Background
Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid‐rich (LRA)... Adrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid-rich (LRA) or... BackgroundAdrenal adenomas (AA) are the most common benign adrenal lesions, often characterized based on intralesional fat content as either lipid‐rich (LRA)... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 198 |
SubjectTerms | adrenal glands Artificial intelligence Classifiers Diagnostic systems Feature extraction Field strength Image acquisition Learning algorithms Lesions Machine learning Magnetic resonance imaging Medical imaging Neuroendocrine tumors Object recognition Parameters Pattern recognition Population (statistical) Population studies Statistical analysis Statistical tests Texture texture analysis |
Title | Characterization of Adrenal Lesions on Unenhanced MRI Using Texture Analysis: A Machine‐Learning Approach |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjmri.25954 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29341325 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2063254075 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1989611806 |
Volume | 48 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1JS8QwFMeDeBAv7su4EdGLQscuSZuIl0EcVBwP4oAXKUmbuIx2ZJaLJz-Cn9FP4ku6DKMi6K20L6RN8tJ_kpdfENr1GdMkSF1Ha0EdwhVzGBGuw4lOuKBUUcvZbl2Gp21yfkNvJtBRuRcm50NUE27GM2x_bRxcyP7BCBr6-Nx7qIN4pwYGaoK1jCK6GrGjOLcnFIN-CByPuVHFJvUPRknH_0bfJOa4YrW_nOYsui1fNo806dSHA1lPXr9wHP_7NXNoptCiuJE3nnk0obIFNNUqVtsXUee4ojnnmzVxV-OG2foNqS6UmWfrY7jbzlR2byMJcOvqDNsoBHwNvf6wp3BJPTnEDdyykZvq4-29wLre4UbBNF9C7ebJ9fGpUxzO4CQBjYiTRlrThCWUu4kgfuSlIiEKRkcycDmM0L1UM64pDO_AXjMVMRlIKUjIQJB6vgyW0WTWzdQqwsKL0khoyUJJiFae5EKEQUpAvIB6S2kN7ZWVFCcFudwcoPEU58xlPzalF9vSq6GdyvYl53X8aLVR1nVc-Gw_9kGt-YZHCBluV4_B28wSishUd9iPTYRZaKh5YQ2t5G2kygaEEygCH1Lv25r-Jf_4HKrDXq39xXgdTYNeY3m08AaaHPSGahM00UBu2bb_CQsNCG4 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1JT9wwFMctChLtha0Lw-oKLlTKkMVObG4jFg10wgHNSNwsO7ELpWTQLBdOfAQ-I5-EZyeTEVAhtbcosWXF9rP_tp9_D6HdkDFDotz3jJHUI1wzjxHpe5yYjEtKNXWc7fQ8bvfI2SW9rHxz7F2Ykg9Rb7hZy3DjtTVwuyG9P6WG_r4dXDdBvVPyAc3ZkN42gMHRxZQexbmLUQwKIvIC5ic1nTTcn-Z9OR-9EZkvNaubdE4Wy8iqQ8cqtL4mN83xSDWz-1ckx__-nyW0UMlR3Cr7zzKa0cUKmk-rA_fP6OawBjqX9zVx3-CWvf0NuTrabrUNMbztFbq4cs4EOL04xc4RAXdh4B8PNJ6ATw5wC6fOeVM_PTxWZNdfuFVhzb-g3slx97DtVfEZvCyiCfHyxBiasYxyP5MkTIJcZkTDAklFPodFepAbxg2FFR6kN0wnTEVKSRIz0KRBqKKvaLboF3oVYRkkeSKNYrEixOhAcSnjKCegX0DA5bSB9iatJLIKXm5jaPwRJXY5FLb2hKu9Btqp096VyI6_ptqYNLaozHYoQhBsoUUSQoHf689gcPYURRa6Px4K62QWW3Be3EDfyk5SFwPaCURBCLl_uKZ-p3xxBs3hntb-JfE2-tjuph3ROT3_uY4-gXxjpfPwBpodDcZ6EyTSSG05Q3gGfF0MiA |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1bTxQxFMdPEBPiC-INV0Br9EWTWebSzrSElw26AWSJIWzCi2namVYUmCV7eeGJj8Bn5JNw2rlsUGOib5OZ03Sm7en8257-CvA-5tzSpAgDaxULqDA84FSFgaA2F4oxwzxne3CY7g7p_gk7WYDtZi9MxYdoJ9ycZ_j-2jn4ZWE359DQnxfjH10U74w-gIc0RW9xkuhoDo8Swh9RjAIiCSIeZi2cNN6cp73_O_pNY96XrP6f038M35q3rUJNzrqzqe7mV7-AHP_3c1ZguRajpFe1niewYMqnsDSol9ufwdlOi3OudmuSkSU9t_cbUx0YN9E2IXh3WJry1IcSkMHRHvFhCOQYu_3Z2JAGe7JFemTgQzfN7fVNzXX9Tno11Pw5DPufj3d2g_p0hiBPWEaDIrOW5TxnIswVjbOoUDk1ODzSSShwiB4VlgvLcHyH9pabjOtEa0VTjoo0inXyAhbLUWleAlFRVmTKap5qSq2JtFAqTQqK6gXlW8E68KGpJJnX6HJ3gsa5rKDLsXSlJ33pdeBda3tZATv-aLXe1LWsnXYiY5RrsQMSYoZv28fobm4NRZVmNJtIF2KWOmxe2oHVqo202aByQkkQY-qPvqb_kr_cx-rwV6_-xfgNLH391JcHe4df1uARajdeRQ6vw-J0PDMbqI-m-rV3gztwBgtA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization+of+Adrenal+Lesions+on+Unenhanced+MRI+Using+Texture+Analysis%3A+A+Machine%E2%80%90Learning+Approach&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+magnetic+resonance+imaging&rft.au=Romeo%2C+Valeria&rft.au=Maurea%2C+Simone&rft.au=Cuocolo%2C+Renato&rft.au=Petretta%2C+Mario&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=204&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjmri.25954&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fjmri.25954&rft.externalDocID=JMRI25954 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon |