A strategy of idarucizumab for pericardial tamponade during perioperative period of atrial fibrillation ablation

• Published in: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology Vol. 44; no. 11; pp. 1824 - 1831
• Main Authors: Zhao, Xin, Chen, Li‐zhu, Su, Xin, Long, De‐yong, Sang, Cai‐hua, Yu, Rong‐Hui, Tang, Ri‐bo, Bai, Rong, Liu, Nian, Jiang, Chen‐xi, Li, Song‐nan, Guo, Xue‐yuan, Wang, Wei, Du, Xin, Dong, Jian‐zeng, Ma, Chang‐sheng
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2021
• Subjects: Ablation; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage; Antithrombins - administration & dosage; atrial fibrillation; Atrial Fibrillation - surgery; Cardiac arrhythmia; Cardiac Tamponade - drug therapy; Cardiac Tamponade - etiology; Catheter Ablation; Catheters; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran - administration & dosage; Embolism; Female; Fibrillation; Hemostasis; Humans; idacezumab; Male; Middle Aged; Monoclonal antibodies; Patients; pericardial tamponade; Perioperative Period; Protamine; Retrospective Studies; Surgical drains; Tamponade; uninterrupted dabigatran; atrial fibrillation; pericardial tamponade; catheter ablation; idacezumab; uninterrupted dabigatran
• ISSN: 0147-8389; 1540-8159; 1540-8159
• DOI: 10.1111/pace.14344

Objective To investigate theoptimal idarucizumab (dabigatran antagonist) usage strategy for patients with acute pericardial tamponade receiving uninterrupted dabigatran during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Ten patients presenting acute pericardial tamponade while receiving uninterrupted dabigatran during catheter ablation for AF in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2019 to July 2020 were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed. A “wait and see” strategy of idarucizumab was carried out for all patients; in brief, idarucizumab was applied following pericardiocentesis, comprehensive evaluation of bleeding and hemostasis. Results There were five males, five paroxysmal AF, and the average age of the patients was 64.0 ± 9.8 years. Among the 10 patients, four were treated with dabigatran 110 mg, six were treated with dabigatran 150 mg, and one was simultaneously given clopidogrel. The average time from pericardial tamponade to the last dose of dabigatran was 8.2 ± 3.4 h. All patients underwent pericardiocentesis successfully, and the average drainage volume was 322.5 ml (220.0 ± 935.0 ml). For reversal anticoagulation, six patients received protamine, and five patients received idarucizumab. Of the five patients who were treated with idarucizumab, four presented exact hemostasis, except for one patient who underwent continuous drainage and finally received surgery repair. The average time to restart anticoagulation was 1.1 ± 0.3 days after the procedure, and no rebleeding, embolism or deaths were observed. Conclusion The “wait and see” strategy of idarucizumab for acute pericardial tamponade during the perioperative period of catheter ablation for AF may be safe and feasible.