MRI‐Based Computer‐Aided Diagnostic Model to Predict Tumor Grading and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Background MRI acts as a potential resource for exploration and interpretation to identify tumor characterization by advanced computer‐aided diagnostic (CAD) methods. Purpose To evaluate and validate the performance of MRI‐based CAD models for identifying low‐grade and high‐grade soft tissue sarcoma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 56; no. 6; pp. 1733 - 1745
Main Authors Yang, Yuhan, Zhou, Yin, Zhou, Chen, Zhang, Xuemei, Ma, Xuelei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.12.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background MRI acts as a potential resource for exploration and interpretation to identify tumor characterization by advanced computer‐aided diagnostic (CAD) methods. Purpose To evaluate and validate the performance of MRI‐based CAD models for identifying low‐grade and high‐grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and for investigating survival prognostication. Study Type Retrospective. Subjects A total of 540 patients (295 male/female: 295/245, median age: 42 years) with STSs. Field Sequence 5‐T MRI with T1WI sequence and fat‐suppressed T2‐weighted (T2FS) sequence. Assessment Manual regions of interests (ROIs) were delineated for generation of radiomic features. Automatic segmentation and pretrained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were performed for deep learning (DL) analysis. The last fully connected layer at the top of CNNs was removed, and the global max pooling was added to transform feature maps to numeric values. Tumor grade was determined on histological specimens. Statistical Tests The support vector machine was adopted as the classifier for all MRI‐based models. The DL signature was derived from the DL‐MRI model with the highest area under the curve (AUC). The significant clinical variables, tumor location and size, integrated with radiomics and DL signatures were ready for construction of clinical‐MRI nomogram to identify tumor grading. The prognostic value of clinical variables and these MRI‐based signatures for overall survival (OS) was evaluated via Cox proportional hazard. Results The clinical‐MRI differentiation nomogram represented an AUC of 0.870 in the training cohort, and an AUC of 0.855, accuracy of 79.01%, sensitivity of 79.03%, and specificity of 78.95% in the validation cohort. The prognostic model showed good performance for OS with 3‐year C‐index of 0.681 and 0.642 and 5‐year C‐index of 0.722 and 0.676 in the training and validation cohorts. Data Conclusion MRI‐based CAD nomogram represents effective abilities in classification of low‐grade and high‐grade STSs. The MRI‐based prognostic model yields favorable preoperative capacities to identify long‐term survivals for STSs. Evidence Level 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 4
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.28160