Contrast-Enhanced Subtraction Harmonic Sonography for Evaluating Treatment Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Our objective was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography in evaluating the treatment response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Thirty-two hepatocellular carcinoma lesions in 26 patients (age range, 44-85 years; mean age, 66 years) were examined with L...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 176; no. 3; pp. 661 - 666 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Leesburg, VA
Am Roentgen Ray Soc
01.03.2001
American Roentgen Ray Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
DOI | 10.2214/ajr.176.3.1760661 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Our objective was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography in evaluating the treatment response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Thirty-two hepatocellular carcinoma lesions in 26 patients (age range, 44-85 years; mean age, 66 years) were examined with Levovist-enhanced intermittent harmonic imaging before and after therapy. A Toshiba Powervision 8000 was used. A subtraction image was obtained by digitally subtracting the last-frame harmonic image from the first-frame image when multishot mode was preset. Results of contrast-enhanced CT were compared with the results of subtraction harmonic imaging.
Before therapy, an enhancement pattern of tumor vascularity was seen for 93.8% (30/32) of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules on subtraction harmonic imaging. After therapy, subtraction harmonic imaging showed 46.7% (14/30) enhancement (incomplete tumor necrosis) and 53.3% (16/30) no enhancement (complete tumor necrosis). When dynamic CT was the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of subtraction harmonic imaging were 93.3%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. Intratumoral flow signals in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy on harmonic imaging were used as a guide to target additional percutaneous therapy.
Digital subtraction contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging can depict tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy sensitively and accurately. Because it is easy to perform and provides real-time needle insertion guidance, it may be preferable to perform after localized therapy to monitor treatment response, which will reduce unnecessary CT scanning. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Our objective was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography in evaluating the treatment response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.OBJECTIVEOur objective was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography in evaluating the treatment response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Thirty-two hepatocellular carcinoma lesions in 26 patients (age range, 44-85 years; mean age, 66 years) were examined with Levovist-enhanced intermittent harmonic imaging before and after therapy. A Toshiba Powervision 8000 was used. A subtraction image was obtained by digitally subtracting the last-frame harmonic image from the first-frame image when multishot mode was preset. Results of contrast-enhanced CT were compared with the results of subtraction harmonic imaging.SUBJECTS AND METHODSThirty-two hepatocellular carcinoma lesions in 26 patients (age range, 44-85 years; mean age, 66 years) were examined with Levovist-enhanced intermittent harmonic imaging before and after therapy. A Toshiba Powervision 8000 was used. A subtraction image was obtained by digitally subtracting the last-frame harmonic image from the first-frame image when multishot mode was preset. Results of contrast-enhanced CT were compared with the results of subtraction harmonic imaging.Before therapy, an enhancement pattern of tumor vascularity was seen for 93.8% (30/32) of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules on subtraction harmonic imaging. After therapy, subtraction harmonic imaging showed 46.7% (14/30) enhancement (incomplete tumor necrosis) and 53.3% (16/30) no enhancement (complete tumor necrosis). When dynamic CT was the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of subtraction harmonic imaging were 93.3%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. Intratumoral flow signals in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy on harmonic imaging were used as a guide to target additional percutaneous therapy.RESULTSBefore therapy, an enhancement pattern of tumor vascularity was seen for 93.8% (30/32) of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules on subtraction harmonic imaging. After therapy, subtraction harmonic imaging showed 46.7% (14/30) enhancement (incomplete tumor necrosis) and 53.3% (16/30) no enhancement (complete tumor necrosis). When dynamic CT was the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of subtraction harmonic imaging were 93.3%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. Intratumoral flow signals in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy on harmonic imaging were used as a guide to target additional percutaneous therapy.Digital subtraction contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging can depict tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy sensitively and accurately. Because it is easy to perform and provides real-time needle insertion guidance, it may be preferable to perform after localized therapy to monitor treatment response, which will reduce unnecessary CT scanning.CONCLUSIONDigital subtraction contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging can depict tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy sensitively and accurately. Because it is easy to perform and provides real-time needle insertion guidance, it may be preferable to perform after localized therapy to monitor treatment response, which will reduce unnecessary CT scanning. Our objective was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography in evaluating the treatment response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Thirty-two hepatocellular carcinoma lesions in 26 patients (age range, 44-85 years; mean age, 66 years) were examined with Levovist-enhanced intermittent harmonic imaging before and after therapy. A Toshiba Powervision 8000 was used. A subtraction image was obtained by digitally subtracting the last-frame harmonic image from the first-frame image when multishot mode was preset. Results of contrast-enhanced CT were compared with the results of subtraction harmonic imaging. Before therapy, an enhancement pattern of tumor vascularity was seen for 93.8% (30/32) of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules on subtraction harmonic imaging. After therapy, subtraction harmonic imaging showed 46.7% (14/30) enhancement (incomplete tumor necrosis) and 53.3% (16/30) no enhancement (complete tumor necrosis). When dynamic CT was the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of subtraction harmonic imaging were 93.3%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. Intratumoral flow signals in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy on harmonic imaging were used as a guide to target additional percutaneous therapy. Digital subtraction contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging can depict tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy sensitively and accurately. Because it is easy to perform and provides real-time needle insertion guidance, it may be preferable to perform after localized therapy to monitor treatment response, which will reduce unnecessary CT scanning. |
Author | Ding, Hong Maekawa, Kiyoshi Suetomi, Yoichiro Minami, Yasunori Kudo, Masatoshi Onda, Hirokazu |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Ding, Hong – sequence: 2 fullname: Kudo, Masatoshi – sequence: 3 fullname: Onda, Hirokazu – sequence: 4 fullname: Suetomi, Yoichiro – sequence: 5 fullname: Minami, Yasunori – sequence: 6 fullname: Maekawa, Kiyoshi |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=940167$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11222201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kVGL1DAQgIOceHunP8AXCQi-dc203bR9lGV1hYMT7wTfwjSd7uZokzVJLffgfzfLrgo-XB4SmHwzzMx3xS6ss8TYaxDLPIfyPT74JVRyWRxvISU8YwtYlTIroIQLthCFhKwWxfdLdhXCgxCiqpvqBbsEyNMRsGC_1s5GjyFmG7tHq6njd1ObIjoaZ_kW_eis0fzOWbfzeNg_8t55vvmJw4TR2B2_94RxJBv5VwoHZwNxY_mX9Jligc8m7vmWDhidpmGYBvR8jV4b60Z8yZ73OAR6dX6v2bePm_v1Nru5_fR5_eEm08VKxqwD0aCGRsq-g7xqmxartlxRQbWo64YKQKmrlmpZtt2q0JRTKwBAI5W0avrimr071T1492OiENVowrEdtOSmoCohy6Zu6gS-OYNTO1KnDt6M6B_Vn4Ul4O0ZwKBx6H3amQl_uaYUIKtEwYnS3oXgqf9XSKijOpXUqSRNFeqsLuVU_-VoE_FoIdkww5OZ5-n2ZrefjScVRhyGNAKoeZ5P8BH8DbU3rkI |
CODEN | AAJRDX |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_S0033_8338_05_72805_8 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcu_10151 crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_178_5_1781147 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0929_6441_08_60003_X crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v11_i40_6348 crossref_primary_10_1111_den_12900 crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2251011298 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13247720 crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_181_1_1810057 crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2007_26_9_1191 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02481273 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12072_010_9165_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_005_0393_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_005_0397_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10396_005_0045_z crossref_primary_10_1016_S0929_6441_08_60045_4 crossref_primary_10_3350_cmh_2015_21_2_165 crossref_primary_10_1034_j_1600_0455_2003_00009_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2006_09_003 crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2005_24_3_285 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02480850 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1440_1746_2009_06207_x crossref_primary_10_1148_radiographics_21_suppl_1_g01oc11s17 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_05_0535 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1872_034X_2007_00184_x crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02481219 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcu_20217 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10396_006_0104_0 crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_14206699 crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2006_25_4_477 crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_180_1_1800143 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v9_i8_1667 crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_51_19_003 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10396_005_0082_7 crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2293020858 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1478_3231_2007_01655_x crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_180_3_1800703 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcu_20018 crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_27365821 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_006_0264_8 crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2005_24_7_1027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2009_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcu_1058 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_20049 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02481368 crossref_primary_10_3380_jmicrowavesurg_20_17 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10396_006_0097_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_005_0375_8 crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_183_1_1830153 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02485167 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1051_0443_07_61784_9 crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2002_21_4_391 crossref_primary_10_3380_jmicrowavesurg_25_75 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02481367 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10396_005_0052_0 crossref_primary_10_1586_14737140_1_2_277 |
Cites_doi | 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717224 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807563 10.1002/1097-0142(19840801)54:3<387::AID-CNCR2820540303>3.0.CO;2-W 10.1097/00004424-199702000-00008 10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn06643 10.2214/ajr.158.3.1310826 10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap08153 10.1136/hrt.81.6.636 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717225 10.1002/bjs.1800810233 10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769824 10.1016/0301-5629(89)90044-6 10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv17438 10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe01381 10.1016/S0301-5629(98)00182-3 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988211 10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530053 10.1148/radiology.182.3.1311116 10.3109/02841859709172094 10.1016/S0720-048X(98)00056-4 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199601)24:1<31::AID-JCU5>3.0.CO;2-M 10.1148/radiology.182.1.1309217 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888742 10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997536 10.1148/radiology.185.2.1329143 10.1148/radiology.179.3.1851313 10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134557 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2001 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2001 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.2214/ajr.176.3.1760661 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1546-3141 |
EndPage | 666 |
ExternalDocumentID | 11222201 940167 10_2214_ajr_176_3_1760661 www176_3_661 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | - 08R 1KJ 23M 2WC 34G 39C 3O- 53G 55 5GY 5RE AAEJM AAWTL ABFLS ABOCM ACRZS ADACO ADBBV AENEX AFFNX AJJEV AJYGW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL C1A CS3 DIK E3Z EBS EJD F5P GJ GX1 H13 L7B LSO O0- P2P SJN TRR UDS VH1 W2D WH7 WOQ X7M ZA5 ZGI ZXP --- -DD .55 .GJ 1CY AAYXX AI. CITATION J5H MJL TR2 TWZ W8F YJK YQI YQJ ZVN IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PKN 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d109ac1966fd127b9ba7b45e3e80889e31a6c7be864bd53ce2eb0111cae4e59f3 |
ISSN | 0361-803X |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 01:55:03 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:28:00 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:14:01 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:34 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:07:54 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 10 19:20:07 EST 2020 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | Sonography Human Subtraction Treatment efficiency Digestive diseases Hepatic disease Harmonic analysis Hepatocellular carcinoma Malignant tumor Technique Contrast media |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c356t-d109ac1966fd127b9ba7b45e3e80889e31a6c7be864bd53ce2eb0111cae4e59f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 11222201 |
PQID | 70649898 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_70649898 pubmed_primary_11222201 pascalfrancis_primary_940167 crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_176_3_1760661 crossref_citationtrail_10_2214_ajr_176_3_1760661 highwire_smallpub1_www176_3_661 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2001-03-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2001-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2001 text: 2001-03-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Leesburg, VA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Leesburg, VA – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | American journal of roentgenology (1976) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | AJR Am J Roentgenol |
PublicationYear | 2001 |
Publisher | Am Roentgen Ray Soc American Roentgen Ray Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: Am Roentgen Ray Soc – name: American Roentgen Ray Society |
References | REF9 REF7 REF8 REF5 REF6 REF3 REF4 REF22 REF21 REF20 REF26 REF25 REF24 REF23 REF28 REF27 REF11 REF10 REF15 REF14 REF13 REF12 REF1 REF19 REF2 REF18 REF17 REF16 |
References_xml | – ident: REF5 doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717224 – ident: REF17 – ident: REF27 doi: 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807563 – ident: REF22 doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840801)54:3<387::AID-CNCR2820540303>3.0.CO;2-W – ident: REF25 doi: 10.1097/00004424-199702000-00008 – ident: REF28 doi: 10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn06643 – ident: REF8 doi: 10.2214/ajr.158.3.1310826 – ident: REF18 doi: 10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap08153 – ident: REF26 doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.6.636 – ident: REF1 doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717225 – ident: REF16 doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810233 – ident: REF15 doi: 10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769824 – ident: REF13 doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(89)90044-6 – ident: REF23 doi: 10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv17438 – ident: REF19 doi: 10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe01381 – ident: REF20 doi: 10.1016/S0301-5629(98)00182-3 – ident: REF24 doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988211 – ident: REF6 doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530053 – ident: REF21 doi: 10.1148/radiology.182.3.1311116 – ident: REF12 doi: 10.3109/02841859709172094 – ident: REF7 doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(98)00056-4 – ident: REF14 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199601)24:1<31::AID-JCU5>3.0.CO;2-M – ident: REF11 doi: 10.1148/radiology.182.1.1309217 – ident: REF10 doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888742 – ident: REF9 doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997536 – ident: REF3 doi: 10.1148/radiology.185.2.1329143 – ident: REF2 doi: 10.1148/radiology.179.3.1851313 – ident: REF4 doi: 10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134557 |
SSID | ssj0007897 |
Score | 1.9518422 |
Snippet | Our objective was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography in evaluating the treatment response of patients with... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref highwire |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 661 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Antibiotics, Antineoplastic - administration & dosage Biological and medical sciences Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy Chemoembolization, Therapeutic Contrast Media Digestion. Liver. Biliary tract. Spleen. Pancreas Epirubicin - administration & dosage Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Liver Neoplasms - therapy Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas Male Medical sciences Polysaccharides Radionuclide investigations Sensitivity and Specificity Subtraction Technique Tomography, X-Ray Computed Tumors Ultrasonography |
Title | Contrast-Enhanced Subtraction Harmonic Sonography for Evaluating Treatment Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
URI | http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/176/3/661 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11222201 https://www.proquest.com/docview/70649898 |
Volume | 176 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jj9MwFLZgkBAXxE5hAB84IaXUcZbmiGBGA7MdaKXeLG_VzKiToDRVpZHmv_O8ZWHYL1YV2U6a74v9bL_3PYTepjKhGReTSMAiOUoyOYk4napIUa6SVIppXphA4eOT7GCefFmki85X1UaXNGIsr34aV_I_qMI1wNVEyf4Dsm2ncAF-A75QAsJQ_hXGRlqq5usm0uWZO8lfb0RT-_TfRpTa5rcBk9oLUw8Evm2CiOBmXjtfWSsh4rVWfeDbGUxYTWU2-K3HqjTJh8rKD-dBvzac-_SEKOoK-jASsFbkyehBgU3S23j45LOptGdVhxtVDfZnT0vFBzW-bnRTXZ5300bYruj5a7VhWgSmRZsEuBuCXQ4YzzXaG1AzJ9X-40AfxyQxs9hFPYa2Y2rKia87FNU-OWX786MjNttbzG6jO3Geu9P8z4fthJ1PbQ6e9snc4be5xfsbNxiaL0FS2njU8jV8VEuXDeXXyxVrtsweoPt-vYE_OPI8RLd0-QjdPfYeFY_R9Q0O4R6HcOAQ7jiEgUO44xBuOYQDh_B5iQOHsOEQHnIItxx6gub7e7OPB5FPyRFJmmZNpMik4BJG7WypSJyLQvBcJKmmemr85TQlPJO50NMsESqlUsdawAxCJNeJToslfYp2yqrUzxEmRSKIsgfHYCGBISxlrohUSizBsBLLEZqEN82k16s3aVNWDNatBhwG4DCAhVHmwRmhd22Tb06s5XeV3wT42PqSr1YAE2Hb7dbVsjV2B6i2fRaJCd6BDgLIDMZk8w55qavNmuXwr0xe1hF65rDvnoaAPQ4294s_tn2J7nWfzy7aaeqNfgX2byNeW_Z-B6xUt4k |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrast-enhanced+subtraction+harmonic+sonography+for+evaluating+treatment+response+in+patients+with+hepatocellular+carcinoma&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=Ding%2C+H&rft.au=Kudo%2C+M&rft.au=Onda%2C+H&rft.au=Suetomi%2C+Y&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.volume=176&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=661&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2Fajr.176.3.1760661&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |