Contrast-Enhanced Subtraction Harmonic Sonography for Evaluating Treatment Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Our objective was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography in evaluating the treatment response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Thirty-two hepatocellular carcinoma lesions in 26 patients (age range, 44-85 years; mean age, 66 years) were examined with L...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 176; no. 3; pp. 661 - 666
Main Authors Ding, Hong, Kudo, Masatoshi, Onda, Hirokazu, Suetomi, Yoichiro, Minami, Yasunori, Maekawa, Kiyoshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Leesburg, VA Am Roentgen Ray Soc 01.03.2001
American Roentgen Ray Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0361-803X
1546-3141
DOI10.2214/ajr.176.3.1760661

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Our objective was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography in evaluating the treatment response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Thirty-two hepatocellular carcinoma lesions in 26 patients (age range, 44-85 years; mean age, 66 years) were examined with Levovist-enhanced intermittent harmonic imaging before and after therapy. A Toshiba Powervision 8000 was used. A subtraction image was obtained by digitally subtracting the last-frame harmonic image from the first-frame image when multishot mode was preset. Results of contrast-enhanced CT were compared with the results of subtraction harmonic imaging. Before therapy, an enhancement pattern of tumor vascularity was seen for 93.8% (30/32) of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules on subtraction harmonic imaging. After therapy, subtraction harmonic imaging showed 46.7% (14/30) enhancement (incomplete tumor necrosis) and 53.3% (16/30) no enhancement (complete tumor necrosis). When dynamic CT was the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of subtraction harmonic imaging were 93.3%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. Intratumoral flow signals in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy on harmonic imaging were used as a guide to target additional percutaneous therapy. Digital subtraction contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging can depict tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy sensitively and accurately. Because it is easy to perform and provides real-time needle insertion guidance, it may be preferable to perform after localized therapy to monitor treatment response, which will reduce unnecessary CT scanning.
AbstractList Our objective was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography in evaluating the treatment response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.OBJECTIVEOur objective was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography in evaluating the treatment response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Thirty-two hepatocellular carcinoma lesions in 26 patients (age range, 44-85 years; mean age, 66 years) were examined with Levovist-enhanced intermittent harmonic imaging before and after therapy. A Toshiba Powervision 8000 was used. A subtraction image was obtained by digitally subtracting the last-frame harmonic image from the first-frame image when multishot mode was preset. Results of contrast-enhanced CT were compared with the results of subtraction harmonic imaging.SUBJECTS AND METHODSThirty-two hepatocellular carcinoma lesions in 26 patients (age range, 44-85 years; mean age, 66 years) were examined with Levovist-enhanced intermittent harmonic imaging before and after therapy. A Toshiba Powervision 8000 was used. A subtraction image was obtained by digitally subtracting the last-frame harmonic image from the first-frame image when multishot mode was preset. Results of contrast-enhanced CT were compared with the results of subtraction harmonic imaging.Before therapy, an enhancement pattern of tumor vascularity was seen for 93.8% (30/32) of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules on subtraction harmonic imaging. After therapy, subtraction harmonic imaging showed 46.7% (14/30) enhancement (incomplete tumor necrosis) and 53.3% (16/30) no enhancement (complete tumor necrosis). When dynamic CT was the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of subtraction harmonic imaging were 93.3%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. Intratumoral flow signals in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy on harmonic imaging were used as a guide to target additional percutaneous therapy.RESULTSBefore therapy, an enhancement pattern of tumor vascularity was seen for 93.8% (30/32) of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules on subtraction harmonic imaging. After therapy, subtraction harmonic imaging showed 46.7% (14/30) enhancement (incomplete tumor necrosis) and 53.3% (16/30) no enhancement (complete tumor necrosis). When dynamic CT was the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of subtraction harmonic imaging were 93.3%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. Intratumoral flow signals in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy on harmonic imaging were used as a guide to target additional percutaneous therapy.Digital subtraction contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging can depict tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy sensitively and accurately. Because it is easy to perform and provides real-time needle insertion guidance, it may be preferable to perform after localized therapy to monitor treatment response, which will reduce unnecessary CT scanning.CONCLUSIONDigital subtraction contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging can depict tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy sensitively and accurately. Because it is easy to perform and provides real-time needle insertion guidance, it may be preferable to perform after localized therapy to monitor treatment response, which will reduce unnecessary CT scanning.
Our objective was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography in evaluating the treatment response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Thirty-two hepatocellular carcinoma lesions in 26 patients (age range, 44-85 years; mean age, 66 years) were examined with Levovist-enhanced intermittent harmonic imaging before and after therapy. A Toshiba Powervision 8000 was used. A subtraction image was obtained by digitally subtracting the last-frame harmonic image from the first-frame image when multishot mode was preset. Results of contrast-enhanced CT were compared with the results of subtraction harmonic imaging. Before therapy, an enhancement pattern of tumor vascularity was seen for 93.8% (30/32) of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules on subtraction harmonic imaging. After therapy, subtraction harmonic imaging showed 46.7% (14/30) enhancement (incomplete tumor necrosis) and 53.3% (16/30) no enhancement (complete tumor necrosis). When dynamic CT was the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of subtraction harmonic imaging were 93.3%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. Intratumoral flow signals in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy on harmonic imaging were used as a guide to target additional percutaneous therapy. Digital subtraction contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging can depict tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma after therapy sensitively and accurately. Because it is easy to perform and provides real-time needle insertion guidance, it may be preferable to perform after localized therapy to monitor treatment response, which will reduce unnecessary CT scanning.
Author Ding, Hong
Maekawa, Kiyoshi
Suetomi, Yoichiro
Minami, Yasunori
Kudo, Masatoshi
Onda, Hirokazu
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Ding, Hong
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Kudo, Masatoshi
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Onda, Hirokazu
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Suetomi, Yoichiro
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Minami, Yasunori
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Maekawa, Kiyoshi
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=940167$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11222201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kVGL1DAQgIOceHunP8AXCQi-dc203bR9lGV1hYMT7wTfwjSd7uZokzVJLffgfzfLrgo-XB4SmHwzzMx3xS6ss8TYaxDLPIfyPT74JVRyWRxvISU8YwtYlTIroIQLthCFhKwWxfdLdhXCgxCiqpvqBbsEyNMRsGC_1s5GjyFmG7tHq6njd1ObIjoaZ_kW_eis0fzOWbfzeNg_8t55vvmJw4TR2B2_94RxJBv5VwoHZwNxY_mX9Jligc8m7vmWDhidpmGYBvR8jV4b60Z8yZ73OAR6dX6v2bePm_v1Nru5_fR5_eEm08VKxqwD0aCGRsq-g7xqmxartlxRQbWo64YKQKmrlmpZtt2q0JRTKwBAI5W0avrimr071T1492OiENVowrEdtOSmoCohy6Zu6gS-OYNTO1KnDt6M6B_Vn4Ul4O0ZwKBx6H3amQl_uaYUIKtEwYnS3oXgqf9XSKijOpXUqSRNFeqsLuVU_-VoE_FoIdkww5OZ5-n2ZrefjScVRhyGNAKoeZ5P8BH8DbU3rkI
CODEN AAJRDX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_S0033_8338_05_72805_8
crossref_primary_10_1002_jcu_10151
crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_178_5_1781147
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0929_6441_08_60003_X
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v11_i40_6348
crossref_primary_10_1111_den_12900
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2251011298
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13247720
crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_181_1_1810057
crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2007_26_9_1191
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02481273
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12072_010_9165_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_005_0393_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_005_0397_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10396_005_0045_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0929_6441_08_60045_4
crossref_primary_10_3350_cmh_2015_21_2_165
crossref_primary_10_1034_j_1600_0455_2003_00009_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2006_09_003
crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2005_24_3_285
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02480850
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1440_1746_2009_06207_x
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiographics_21_suppl_1_g01oc11s17
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_05_0535
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1872_034X_2007_00184_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02481219
crossref_primary_10_1002_jcu_20217
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10396_006_0104_0
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_14206699
crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2006_25_4_477
crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_180_1_1800143
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v9_i8_1667
crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_51_19_003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10396_005_0082_7
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2293020858
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1478_3231_2007_01655_x
crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_180_3_1800703
crossref_primary_10_1002_jcu_20018
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_27365821
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_006_0264_8
crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2005_24_7_1027
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2009_03_006
crossref_primary_10_1002_jcu_1058
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_20049
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02481368
crossref_primary_10_3380_jmicrowavesurg_20_17
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10396_006_0097_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_005_0375_8
crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_183_1_1830153
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02485167
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1051_0443_07_61784_9
crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2002_21_4_391
crossref_primary_10_3380_jmicrowavesurg_25_75
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02481367
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10396_005_0052_0
crossref_primary_10_1586_14737140_1_2_277
Cites_doi 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717224
10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807563
10.1002/1097-0142(19840801)54:3<387::AID-CNCR2820540303>3.0.CO;2-W
10.1097/00004424-199702000-00008
10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn06643
10.2214/ajr.158.3.1310826
10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap08153
10.1136/hrt.81.6.636
10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717225
10.1002/bjs.1800810233
10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769824
10.1016/0301-5629(89)90044-6
10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv17438
10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe01381
10.1016/S0301-5629(98)00182-3
10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988211
10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530053
10.1148/radiology.182.3.1311116
10.3109/02841859709172094
10.1016/S0720-048X(98)00056-4
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199601)24:1<31::AID-JCU5>3.0.CO;2-M
10.1148/radiology.182.1.1309217
10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888742
10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997536
10.1148/radiology.185.2.1329143
10.1148/radiology.179.3.1851313
10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134557
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2001 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2001 INIST-CNRS
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.2214/ajr.176.3.1760661
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1546-3141
EndPage 666
ExternalDocumentID 11222201
940167
10_2214_ajr_176_3_1760661
www176_3_661
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID -
08R
1KJ
23M
2WC
34G
39C
3O-
53G
55
5GY
5RE
AAEJM
AAWTL
ABFLS
ABOCM
ACRZS
ADACO
ADBBV
AENEX
AFFNX
AJJEV
AJYGW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GJ
GX1
H13
L7B
LSO
O0-
P2P
SJN
TRR
UDS
VH1
W2D
WH7
WOQ
X7M
ZA5
ZGI
ZXP
---
-DD
.55
.GJ
1CY
AAYXX
AI.
CITATION
J5H
MJL
TR2
TWZ
W8F
YJK
YQI
YQJ
ZVN
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PKN
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d109ac1966fd127b9ba7b45e3e80889e31a6c7be864bd53ce2eb0111cae4e59f3
ISSN 0361-803X
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 01:55:03 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:28:00 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:14:01 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:34 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:07:54 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 10 19:20:07 EST 2020
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Sonography
Human
Subtraction
Treatment efficiency
Digestive diseases
Hepatic disease
Harmonic analysis
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Malignant tumor
Technique
Contrast media
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c356t-d109ac1966fd127b9ba7b45e3e80889e31a6c7be864bd53ce2eb0111cae4e59f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 11222201
PQID 70649898
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_70649898
pubmed_primary_11222201
pascalfrancis_primary_940167
crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_176_3_1760661
crossref_citationtrail_10_2214_ajr_176_3_1760661
highwire_smallpub1_www176_3_661
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2001-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2001-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2001
  text: 2001-03-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Leesburg, VA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Leesburg, VA
– name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of roentgenology (1976)
PublicationTitleAlternate AJR Am J Roentgenol
PublicationYear 2001
Publisher Am Roentgen Ray Soc
American Roentgen Ray Society
Publisher_xml – name: Am Roentgen Ray Soc
– name: American Roentgen Ray Society
References REF9
REF7
REF8
REF5
REF6
REF3
REF4
REF22
REF21
REF20
REF26
REF25
REF24
REF23
REF28
REF27
REF11
REF10
REF15
REF14
REF13
REF12
REF1
REF19
REF2
REF18
REF17
REF16
References_xml – ident: REF5
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717224
– ident: REF17
– ident: REF27
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807563
– ident: REF22
  doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840801)54:3<387::AID-CNCR2820540303>3.0.CO;2-W
– ident: REF25
  doi: 10.1097/00004424-199702000-00008
– ident: REF28
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn06643
– ident: REF8
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.158.3.1310826
– ident: REF18
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap08153
– ident: REF26
  doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.6.636
– ident: REF1
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717225
– ident: REF16
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810233
– ident: REF15
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769824
– ident: REF13
  doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(89)90044-6
– ident: REF23
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv17438
– ident: REF19
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe01381
– ident: REF20
  doi: 10.1016/S0301-5629(98)00182-3
– ident: REF24
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988211
– ident: REF6
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530053
– ident: REF21
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.182.3.1311116
– ident: REF12
  doi: 10.3109/02841859709172094
– ident: REF7
  doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(98)00056-4
– ident: REF14
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199601)24:1<31::AID-JCU5>3.0.CO;2-M
– ident: REF11
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.182.1.1309217
– ident: REF10
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888742
– ident: REF9
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997536
– ident: REF3
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.185.2.1329143
– ident: REF2
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.179.3.1851313
– ident: REF4
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134557
SSID ssj0007897
Score 1.9518422
Snippet Our objective was to assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography in evaluating the treatment response of patients with...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
highwire
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 661
SubjectTerms Aged
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic - administration & dosage
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy
Chemoembolization, Therapeutic
Contrast Media
Digestion. Liver. Biliary tract. Spleen. Pancreas
Epirubicin - administration & dosage
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Liver Neoplasms - therapy
Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas
Male
Medical sciences
Polysaccharides
Radionuclide investigations
Sensitivity and Specificity
Subtraction Technique
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tumors
Ultrasonography
Title Contrast-Enhanced Subtraction Harmonic Sonography for Evaluating Treatment Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
URI http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/176/3/661
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11222201
https://www.proquest.com/docview/70649898
Volume 176
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jj9MwFLZgkBAXxE5hAB84IaXUcZbmiGBGA7MdaKXeLG_VzKiToDRVpZHmv_O8ZWHYL1YV2U6a74v9bL_3PYTepjKhGReTSMAiOUoyOYk4napIUa6SVIppXphA4eOT7GCefFmki85X1UaXNGIsr34aV_I_qMI1wNVEyf4Dsm2ncAF-A75QAsJQ_hXGRlqq5usm0uWZO8lfb0RT-_TfRpTa5rcBk9oLUw8Evm2CiOBmXjtfWSsh4rVWfeDbGUxYTWU2-K3HqjTJh8rKD-dBvzac-_SEKOoK-jASsFbkyehBgU3S23j45LOptGdVhxtVDfZnT0vFBzW-bnRTXZ5300bYruj5a7VhWgSmRZsEuBuCXQ4YzzXaG1AzJ9X-40AfxyQxs9hFPYa2Y2rKia87FNU-OWX786MjNttbzG6jO3Geu9P8z4fthJ1PbQ6e9snc4be5xfsbNxiaL0FS2njU8jV8VEuXDeXXyxVrtsweoPt-vYE_OPI8RLd0-QjdPfYeFY_R9Q0O4R6HcOAQ7jiEgUO44xBuOYQDh_B5iQOHsOEQHnIItxx6gub7e7OPB5FPyRFJmmZNpMik4BJG7WypSJyLQvBcJKmmemr85TQlPJO50NMsESqlUsdawAxCJNeJToslfYp2yqrUzxEmRSKIsgfHYCGBISxlrohUSizBsBLLEZqEN82k16s3aVNWDNatBhwG4DCAhVHmwRmhd22Tb06s5XeV3wT42PqSr1YAE2Hb7dbVsjV2B6i2fRaJCd6BDgLIDMZk8w55qavNmuXwr0xe1hF65rDvnoaAPQ4294s_tn2J7nWfzy7aaeqNfgX2byNeW_Z-B6xUt4k
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrast-enhanced+subtraction+harmonic+sonography+for+evaluating+treatment+response+in+patients+with+hepatocellular+carcinoma&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=Ding%2C+H&rft.au=Kudo%2C+M&rft.au=Onda%2C+H&rft.au=Suetomi%2C+Y&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.volume=176&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=661&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2Fajr.176.3.1760661&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon