Embedding Technique versus Conventional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Lamellar Macular Holes with Epiretinal Proliferation

To examine the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) embedding and conventional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for lamellar macular holes (LMHs) with LHEP. Retrospective observational study. Forty eyes of 39 consecutive patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOphthalmology retina Vol. 7; no. 1; p. 44
Main Authors Kanai, Masanori, Sakimoto, Susumu, Takahashi, Shizuka, Nishida, Kentaro, Maruyama, Kazuichi, Sato, Shigeru, Sakaguchi, Hirokazu, Nishida, Kohji
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information
ISSN2468-6530
DOI10.1016/j.oret.2022.07.009

Cover

Abstract To examine the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) embedding and conventional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for lamellar macular holes (LMHs) with LHEP. Retrospective observational study. Forty eyes of 39 consecutive patients with LMHs and LHEP who underwent 3-port PPV with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. We compared the results of eyes that underwent PPV with LHEP embedding and ILM peeling (group E) with those of eyes that underwent PPV with ILM peeling only (group I) from September 2010 to September 2021. We confirmed whether the LHEP was embedded using postoperative OCT in all the cases. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the development of macular holes (MHs) were assessed. The mean patient age was 73.3 years. The mean follow-up duration was 23.1 months. There were 23 and 17 eyes in groups E and I, respectively. Preoperative BCVA (P = 0.774) and central retinal thickness (CRT) (P = 0.800) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The final BCVA in group E was better than that in group I (P = 0.059). The final CRT in group E was thicker than that in group I (P < 0.001). Postoperatively, a significant improvement in BCVA was observed in group E at 3 months (P = 0.001) and at the final visit (P < 0.001). None of the eyes in group E developed postoperative MHs, whereas 5 eyes in group I developed postoperative MHs. Pars plana vitrectomy using the LHEP embedding technique improved visual acuity significantly and yielded better anatomic outcomes than those with PPV using conventional ILM peeling; MH formation did not occur. Embedding LHEP is more effective than conventional surgical procedures for LMHs.
AbstractList To examine the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) embedding and conventional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for lamellar macular holes (LMHs) with LHEP. Retrospective observational study. Forty eyes of 39 consecutive patients with LMHs and LHEP who underwent 3-port PPV with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. We compared the results of eyes that underwent PPV with LHEP embedding and ILM peeling (group E) with those of eyes that underwent PPV with ILM peeling only (group I) from September 2010 to September 2021. We confirmed whether the LHEP was embedded using postoperative OCT in all the cases. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the development of macular holes (MHs) were assessed. The mean patient age was 73.3 years. The mean follow-up duration was 23.1 months. There were 23 and 17 eyes in groups E and I, respectively. Preoperative BCVA (P = 0.774) and central retinal thickness (CRT) (P = 0.800) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The final BCVA in group E was better than that in group I (P = 0.059). The final CRT in group E was thicker than that in group I (P < 0.001). Postoperatively, a significant improvement in BCVA was observed in group E at 3 months (P = 0.001) and at the final visit (P < 0.001). None of the eyes in group E developed postoperative MHs, whereas 5 eyes in group I developed postoperative MHs. Pars plana vitrectomy using the LHEP embedding technique improved visual acuity significantly and yielded better anatomic outcomes than those with PPV using conventional ILM peeling; MH formation did not occur. Embedding LHEP is more effective than conventional surgical procedures for LMHs.
Author Maruyama, Kazuichi
Takahashi, Shizuka
Nishida, Kentaro
Kanai, Masanori
Sato, Shigeru
Sakimoto, Susumu
Sakaguchi, Hirokazu
Nishida, Kohji
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Masanori
  surname: Kanai
  fullname: Kanai, Masanori
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Susumu
  surname: Sakimoto
  fullname: Sakimoto, Susumu
  email: susumu.sakimoto@ophthal.med.osaka-u.ac.jp
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives, Osaka University, Suita, Japan. Electronic address: susumu.sakimoto@ophthal.med.osaka-u.ac.jp
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Shizuka
  surname: Takahashi
  fullname: Takahashi, Shizuka
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Kentaro
  surname: Nishida
  fullname: Nishida, Kentaro
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Kazuichi
  surname: Maruyama
  fullname: Maruyama, Kazuichi
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Shigeru
  surname: Sato
  fullname: Sato, Shigeru
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Hirokazu
  surname: Sakaguchi
  fullname: Sakaguchi, Hirokazu
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Kohji
  surname: Nishida
  fullname: Nishida, Kohji
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35933107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1kEFOwzAQRS0EolB6ARbIF0gY24mTLFFVaKVUdFHWlWNPqKvELk5SxJqL0whYvdH8r6fR3JJL5x0Scs8gZsDk4yH2AfuYA-cxZDFAcUFueCLzSKYCJmTWdQcAYDmXMoNrMhFpIQSD7IZ8L9oKjbHunW5R7539GJCeMHRDR-fendD11jvV0JXrMYxDaVvbj_01tlVQDukGsRkXtQ-0VC02jQp0rfQwcukb7Oin7fd0cbTnM-0o2QTf2BqDGu135KpWTYezP07J2_NiO19G5evLav5URlqkso9ykWqpksIkWoncMMkY1IWRWa1Bs4JXSoGSqDlXMk8SU1cZijQpEM-ZyQyfkodf73GoWjS7Y7CtCl-7_2_wH5MIZsI
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10384_024_01127_6
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0000000000004261
crossref_primary_10_2147_IMCRJ_S429577
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0000000000004166
crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm14070755
crossref_primary_10_1080_17469899_2024_2306910
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0000000000003905
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1016/j.oret.2022.07.009
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2468-6530
ExternalDocumentID 35933107
Genre Journal Article
Observational Study
GroupedDBID 0R~
53G
AALRI
AAXUO
ABJNI
ACGFS
AFJKZ
AFTJW
AITUG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CGR
CUY
CVF
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
FDB
M41
NPM
O9-
ROL
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-835c6a49d4ca38d16110f9d67fc0c192baa0a6ec22a6844dfb7e3549ee92bd7d2
IngestDate Thu Apr 03 07:03:45 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Macular surgery
Vitrectomy
Lamellar hole–associated epiretinal proliferation
Lamellar macular hole
Epiretinal proliferation embedding technique
Language English
License Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c356t-835c6a49d4ca38d16110f9d67fc0c192baa0a6ec22a6844dfb7e3549ee92bd7d2
PMID 35933107
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_35933107
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-01-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-01-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Ophthalmology retina
PublicationTitleAlternate Ophthalmol Retina
PublicationYear 2023
SSID ssj0001826670
Score 2.2724848
Snippet To examine the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) embedding and conventional internal...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 44
SubjectTerms Aged
Cell Proliferation
Epiretinal Membrane - diagnosis
Epiretinal Membrane - surgery
Humans
Retina
Retinal Perforations - diagnosis
Retinal Perforations - surgery
Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods
Title Embedding Technique versus Conventional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Lamellar Macular Holes with Epiretinal Proliferation
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35933107
Volume 7
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9tAEF6cFkIupe932UNvRUFZrXalYykuptRuoA7kFvaJ3USycaVLrv09_Y-dfehRpy1tL8JoxWI0H7Mzn-abQeh1KonKFSOJMgVL6IklCZyCYJCiJDJPqbXGJYrzBZud0Q_n-flk8n1UtdQ28lhd_1JX8j9WhXtgV6eS_QfL9pvCDfgN9oUrWBiuf2XjaSWN9qqUZd-K1ZVZtH4Q51BNHmm_qyBncs_PTQVpMgSYpyYI0l214UdRuVqonZtG5KtTZ67bU6Bqp9u10zu6TU7doB9rdoNNY3D7abtqVuKqCm2dwuO9Qxd1GHw9F19Fvdmte2oHQliAyyaWCLVVO5AJl05v5qcOv_m8Wl-3l_12C0edaRGVRY3Ybcb0BclG9IXxbo447RfL49eZ6JP5DegF_xp6Rd5w-4GB-HLslJ-Q8xPiG7L6vgvNCAfbygMhy8ssi8N2_7y614q7WzpAB5y7U2ARqSFP6EGixngahVmhhnD__xyhw26PvTTGhzPLu-hOzEPw2wCqe2hi6vvocB4rLR6gbz22cI8tHLCFx9jCHbZwhy3cYQtHbGHAFu6whSO2sMcWdtjCA7bwT9h6iM7eT5fvZkkc2JGoLGdNAtG8YoKWmiqRFRqSiZPUlppxq1IFqYQUIhXMKEIEKyjVVnKT5bQ0BtY01-QRulVvavMEYW11xhVnkheMalIWrskSnB9CS2t0wZ6ix-H1XWxDV5aL7sU---3Kc3Q0IPAFum3BDZiXEFM28pW35Q-blX4e
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Embedding+Technique+versus+Conventional+Internal+Limiting+Membrane+Peeling+for+Lamellar+Macular+Holes+with+Epiretinal+Proliferation&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology+retina&rft.au=Kanai%2C+Masanori&rft.au=Sakimoto%2C+Susumu&rft.au=Takahashi%2C+Shizuka&rft.au=Nishida%2C+Kentaro&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.eissn=2468-6530&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.oret.2022.07.009&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35933107&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35933107&rft.externalDocID=35933107