A Victorian Embarrassment: Consular Jurisdiction and the Evils of Extraterritoriality

In 1856, the Treaty of Paris nominally welcomed the Ottoman Empire into the Concert of Europe, but this exposed a deep fault line in international relations. Although the gesture implied full sovereign rights, it seemed incompatible with the extraterritorial privileges held by Europeans in Ottoman l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational history review Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 273 - 291
Main Author Cobbing, Andrew
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Toronto Routledge 15.03.2018
Taylor & Francis, Ltd
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract In 1856, the Treaty of Paris nominally welcomed the Ottoman Empire into the Concert of Europe, but this exposed a deep fault line in international relations. Although the gesture implied full sovereign rights, it seemed incompatible with the extraterritorial privileges held by Europeans in Ottoman lands under the age-old capitulations. New commercial treaties complicated the issue by extending similar privileges to British subjects as far afield as China, Siam and Japan. Consular jurisdiction soon became the focus of controversy in Westminster as extraterritoriality featured prominently in local disputes following British commercial expansion across Asia, among them the Arrow incident that led to the Second Opium War. In Japan and other states, it would also become a key grievance in popular campaigns against 'unequal treaties' and the injustices of informal empire. This analysis shows how, even before such narratives of resistance emerged, there was already a seam of ambivalence in Victorian political discourse on the question of extraterritoriality. In the Foreign Office, it came as no surprise to be told of defects in these treaties, but it was the context of the existing debate, notably fresh initiatives to set up mixed courts, that framed the British response.
AbstractList In 1856, the Treaty of Paris nominally welcomed the Ottoman Empire into the Concert of Europe, but this exposed a deep fault line in international relations. Although the gesture implied full sovereign rights, it seemed incompatible with the extraterritorial privileges held by Europeans in Ottoman lands under the age-old capitulations. New commercial treaties complicated the issue by extending similar privileges to British subjects as far afield as China, Siam and Japan. Consular jurisdiction soon became the focus of controversy in Westminster as extraterritoriality featured prominently in local disputes following British commercial expansion across Asia, among them the Arrow incident that led to the Second Opium War. In Japan and other states, it would also become a key grievance in popular campaigns against 'unequal treaties' and the injustices of informal empire. This analysis shows how, even before such narratives of resistance emerged, there was already a seam of ambivalence in Victorian political discourse on the question of extraterritoriality. In the Foreign Office, it came as no surprise to be told of defects in these treaties, but it was the context of the existing debate, notably fresh initiatives to set up mixed courts, that framed the British response.
Author Cobbing, Andrew
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Andrew
  surname: Cobbing
  fullname: Cobbing, Andrew
  email: andrew.cobbing@nottingham.ac.uk
BookMark eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEm3hJ1SyxDnFrzgJJ6qqvFSJC-VquYkjXKV2WbtA_z0OLRy57B72mx3NDNGp884gNKZkQklJrklBipxzNmGEFhPKSZVLdoIGtBJVJnNBTtGgZ7IeOkfDENaE5OkqBmg5xa-2jh6sdni-WWkAHcLGuHiDZ96FXacBP-3AhiZh1jusXYPjm8HzD9sF7Fs8_4qgowGwP286G_cX6KzVXTCXxz1Cy7v5y-whWzzfP86mi6zmeR6zFaO6LcuCSClYLpjUFReNMFIYXqxqncKZhhlDyjYNU9VapMCc6VKYVWkEH6Grw98t-PedCVGt_Q5cslSMJDWVleSJyg9UDT4EMK3agt1o2CtKVN-g-m1Q9Q2qY4NJNz7o1iEl-xMxWRSUyt799nC3rvWw0Z8eukZFve88tKBdbYPi_1t8A644gzI
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017
2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Copyright_xml – notice: 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017
– notice: 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7UB
8BJ
FQK
JBE
DOI 10.1080/07075332.2017.1309562
DatabaseName CrossRef
Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)


DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline History & Archaeology
International Relations
EISSN 1949-6540
EndPage 291
ExternalDocumentID 10_1080_07075332_2017_1309562
26771164
1309562
Genre Article
GeographicLocations United Kingdom--UK
France
Ottoman Empire
Japan
Europe
Paris France
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United Kingdom--UK
– name: Paris France
– name: Ottoman Empire
– name: Europe
– name: France
– name: Japan
GroupedDBID -~X
.7I
.QK
0BK
0R~
29J
4.4
5GY
AACJB
AACKI
AAGZJ
AAMFJ
AAMIU
AAOTU
AAPUL
AATTQ
AAZMC
ABBHK
ABCCR
ABCCY
ABFIM
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABLJU
ABPEM
ABTAI
ABXUL
ABXYU
ACGFS
ACTIO
ACTOA
ADAHI
ADCVX
ADKVQ
ADMHG
AECIN
AEISY
AEKEX
AEOZL
AEPSL
AEYOC
AEZRU
AGDLA
AGMYJ
AGRBW
AHDZW
AIJEM
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AVBZW
AWYRJ
BEJHT
BLEHA
BMOTO
BOHLJ
CCCUG
CQ1
DGFLZ
DKSSO
EBS
EJD
E~B
E~C
F5P
G-F
GTTXZ
H13
HF~
HZ~
IPNFZ
IPSME
J.O
JAF
JENOY
JPL
JST
KYCEM
M4Z
NA5
NV0
O9-
P2P
PQQKQ
PZZ
RIG
RNANH
ROSJB
RSYQP
S-F
SA0
STATR
TAE
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TEA
TFH
TFL
TFW
TN5
TNTFI
TUROJ
UT5
UT9
VQA
WH7
ZUP
~01
~45
~S~
AAGDL
AAHIA
ADYSH
AEFOU
AEUPB
AFRVT
AIYEW
AMPGV
AAYXX
CITATION
7UB
8BJ
FQK
JBE
TASJS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-b21af887066425426a934d4e64e37bca080ed2ee08fee0e9ca410832a84eb8e43
ISSN 0707-5332
IngestDate Fri Jul 25 06:37:24 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:36:52 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 03 21:51:54 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 25 09:03:24 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c355t-b21af887066425426a934d4e64e37bca080ed2ee08fee0e9ca410832a84eb8e43
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
OpenAccessLink http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41838/
PQID 2008016963
PQPubID 46096
PageCount 19
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_2008016963
crossref_primary_10_1080_07075332_2017_1309562
jstor_primary_26771164
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_07075332_2017_1309562
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-03-15
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-03-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-03-15
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Toronto
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Toronto
PublicationTitle International history review
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Routledge
Taylor & Francis, Ltd
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Routledge
– name: Taylor & Francis, Ltd
– name: Taylor & Francis Ltd
SSID ssj0051944
Score 2.0923533
Snippet In 1856, the Treaty of Paris nominally welcomed the Ottoman Empire into the Concert of Europe, but this exposed a deep fault line in international relations....
SourceID proquest
crossref
jstor
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 273
SubjectTerms Ambivalence
Campaigns
consular jurisdiction
Courts
Disputes
Embarrassment
European history
Extraterritoriality
Historical analysis
International law
International relations
Jurisdiction
Opium
Political discourse
Privileges & immunities
Resistance
Trade agreements
Treaties
Victorian period
Title A Victorian Embarrassment: Consular Jurisdiction and the Evils of Extraterritoriality
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07075332.2017.1309562
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26771164
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2008016963
Volume 40
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1RT9swELYYvOxlGgy0Mpj8gPYyBTW2SeK9VVtRhTSeKEN7iezGlfKwdsoCovv1u7PPIRWVYNtL1KZqHN2dz3f23fcxdgJBb5GauUmk0FmCB3OJFkInsLZDuJBa6TyYztfLbDJVFzdnN5HNnrpLWns6-72xr-RftAr3QK_YJfsXmu0eCjfgM-gXrqBhuD5Lx6OP1zVuuuMkHf-wpmlMQNnEPB-pOH2N6QXiBFY1cYJTweT4rg64yeN7j0_bNLV_EEbl_YB1fccwoBOvqOGlO79YWkvUKL36SNpKSH1vXWim3FCDFHxQPswTiAiDw3TBR2qFFTMBZSk6UfpW93JZ8oiBqYQWVxGouR75bSp0hNFwMKy4y5GnGpI38bBQdeWD9MsLtiMgOQDvtjOafPn-La7AEJR6Et_u5WPnFmKqbxpiLSZZQ6yNVaqPVmoffly9Zq8ob-CjYAS7bMst9th-AHlZ8Q8cEYSNZ2levWHTEe8Mg68ZxicezYL3zYKDWXAwC-7Ngi_nfINZ7LPp-fjq8yQh_oxkBlFkm1gBs7DAg2xIMs8gFDNaqkq5TDmZ25kBebhKODcs5nBxemYUyEgKUyhnC6fkAdteLBfuLeO2UiYVbigrYZXSwmTGZFVliqG2yqp8wE6jBMufASalTCP6LIm8RJGXJPIB0305l63fn5oHMplSPvHfA6-UbiSR5XkKef-AHUUtlTRNf3meVYQcyuThf4z5jr18mDFHbLttbt0xhKOtfU_W9wcsDIS0
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Victorian+Embarrassment%3A+Consular+Jurisdiction+and+the+Evils+of+Extraterritoriality&rft.jtitle=International+history+review&rft.au=Cobbing%2C+Andrew&rft.date=2018-03-15&rft.pub=Routledge&rft.issn=0707-5332&rft.eissn=1949-6540&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F07075332.2017.1309562&rft.externalDocID=1309562
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0707-5332&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0707-5332&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0707-5332&client=summon