A Victorian Embarrassment: Consular Jurisdiction and the Evils of Extraterritoriality
In 1856, the Treaty of Paris nominally welcomed the Ottoman Empire into the Concert of Europe, but this exposed a deep fault line in international relations. Although the gesture implied full sovereign rights, it seemed incompatible with the extraterritorial privileges held by Europeans in Ottoman l...
Saved in:
Published in | International history review Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 273 - 291 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Toronto
Routledge
15.03.2018
Taylor & Francis, Ltd Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | In 1856, the Treaty of Paris nominally welcomed the Ottoman Empire into the Concert of Europe, but this exposed a deep fault line in international relations. Although the gesture implied full sovereign rights, it seemed incompatible with the extraterritorial privileges held by Europeans in Ottoman lands under the age-old capitulations. New commercial treaties complicated the issue by extending similar privileges to British subjects as far afield as China, Siam and Japan. Consular jurisdiction soon became the focus of controversy in Westminster as extraterritoriality featured prominently in local disputes following British commercial expansion across Asia, among them the Arrow incident that led to the Second Opium War. In Japan and other states, it would also become a key grievance in popular campaigns against 'unequal treaties' and the injustices of informal empire. This analysis shows how, even before such narratives of resistance emerged, there was already a seam of ambivalence in Victorian political discourse on the question of extraterritoriality. In the Foreign Office, it came as no surprise to be told of defects in these treaties, but it was the context of the existing debate, notably fresh initiatives to set up mixed courts, that framed the British response. |
---|---|
AbstractList | In 1856, the Treaty of Paris nominally welcomed the Ottoman Empire into the Concert of Europe, but this exposed a deep fault line in international relations. Although the gesture implied full sovereign rights, it seemed incompatible with the extraterritorial privileges held by Europeans in Ottoman lands under the age-old capitulations. New commercial treaties complicated the issue by extending similar privileges to British subjects as far afield as China, Siam and Japan. Consular jurisdiction soon became the focus of controversy in Westminster as extraterritoriality featured prominently in local disputes following British commercial expansion across Asia, among them the Arrow incident that led to the Second Opium War. In Japan and other states, it would also become a key grievance in popular campaigns against 'unequal treaties' and the injustices of informal empire. This analysis shows how, even before such narratives of resistance emerged, there was already a seam of ambivalence in Victorian political discourse on the question of extraterritoriality. In the Foreign Office, it came as no surprise to be told of defects in these treaties, but it was the context of the existing debate, notably fresh initiatives to set up mixed courts, that framed the British response. |
Author | Cobbing, Andrew |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Andrew surname: Cobbing fullname: Cobbing, Andrew email: andrew.cobbing@nottingham.ac.uk |
BookMark | eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEm3hJ1SyxDnFrzgJJ6qqvFSJC-VquYkjXKV2WbtA_z0OLRy57B72mx3NDNGp884gNKZkQklJrklBipxzNmGEFhPKSZVLdoIGtBJVJnNBTtGgZ7IeOkfDENaE5OkqBmg5xa-2jh6sdni-WWkAHcLGuHiDZ96FXacBP-3AhiZh1jusXYPjm8HzD9sF7Fs8_4qgowGwP286G_cX6KzVXTCXxz1Cy7v5y-whWzzfP86mi6zmeR6zFaO6LcuCSClYLpjUFReNMFIYXqxqncKZhhlDyjYNU9VapMCc6VKYVWkEH6Grw98t-PedCVGt_Q5cslSMJDWVleSJyg9UDT4EMK3agt1o2CtKVN-g-m1Q9Q2qY4NJNz7o1iEl-xMxWRSUyt799nC3rvWw0Z8eukZFve88tKBdbYPi_1t8A644gzI |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 – notice: 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7UB 8BJ FQK JBE |
DOI | 10.1080/07075332.2017.1309562 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Worldwide Political Science Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | History & Archaeology International Relations |
EISSN | 1949-6540 |
EndPage | 291 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1080_07075332_2017_1309562 26771164 1309562 |
Genre | Article |
GeographicLocations | United Kingdom--UK France Ottoman Empire Japan Europe Paris France |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom--UK – name: Paris France – name: Ottoman Empire – name: Europe – name: France – name: Japan |
GroupedDBID | -~X .7I .QK 0BK 0R~ 29J 4.4 5GY AACJB AACKI AAGZJ AAMFJ AAMIU AAOTU AAPUL AATTQ AAZMC ABBHK ABCCR ABCCY ABFIM ABJNI ABLIJ ABLJU ABPEM ABTAI ABXUL ABXYU ACGFS ACTIO ACTOA ADAHI ADCVX ADKVQ ADMHG AECIN AEISY AEKEX AEOZL AEPSL AEYOC AEZRU AGDLA AGMYJ AGRBW AHDZW AIJEM AKBVH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AVBZW AWYRJ BEJHT BLEHA BMOTO BOHLJ CCCUG CQ1 DGFLZ DKSSO EBS EJD E~B E~C F5P G-F GTTXZ H13 HF~ HZ~ IPNFZ IPSME J.O JAF JENOY JPL JST KYCEM M4Z NA5 NV0 O9- P2P PQQKQ PZZ RIG RNANH ROSJB RSYQP S-F SA0 STATR TAE TBQAZ TDBHL TEA TFH TFL TFW TN5 TNTFI TUROJ UT5 UT9 VQA WH7 ZUP ~01 ~45 ~S~ AAGDL AAHIA ADYSH AEFOU AEUPB AFRVT AIYEW AMPGV AAYXX CITATION 7UB 8BJ FQK JBE TASJS |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-b21af887066425426a934d4e64e37bca080ed2ee08fee0e9ca410832a84eb8e43 |
ISSN | 0707-5332 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 25 06:37:24 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:36:52 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 03 21:51:54 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 25 09:03:24 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c355t-b21af887066425426a934d4e64e37bca080ed2ee08fee0e9ca410832a84eb8e43 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
OpenAccessLink | http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41838/ |
PQID | 2008016963 |
PQPubID | 46096 |
PageCount | 19 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2008016963 crossref_primary_10_1080_07075332_2017_1309562 jstor_primary_26771164 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_07075332_2017_1309562 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2018-03-15 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-03-15 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2018 text: 2018-03-15 day: 15 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Toronto |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Toronto |
PublicationTitle | International history review |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Routledge Taylor & Francis, Ltd Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Routledge – name: Taylor & Francis, Ltd – name: Taylor & Francis Ltd |
SSID | ssj0051944 |
Score | 2.0923533 |
Snippet | In 1856, the Treaty of Paris nominally welcomed the Ottoman Empire into the Concert of Europe, but this exposed a deep fault line in international relations.... |
SourceID | proquest crossref jstor informaworld |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 273 |
SubjectTerms | Ambivalence Campaigns consular jurisdiction Courts Disputes Embarrassment European history Extraterritoriality Historical analysis International law International relations Jurisdiction Opium Political discourse Privileges & immunities Resistance Trade agreements Treaties Victorian period |
Title | A Victorian Embarrassment: Consular Jurisdiction and the Evils of Extraterritoriality |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07075332.2017.1309562 https://www.jstor.org/stable/26771164 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2008016963 |
Volume | 40 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1RT9swELYYvOxlGgy0Mpj8gPYyBTW2SeK9VVtRhTSeKEN7iezGlfKwdsoCovv1u7PPIRWVYNtL1KZqHN2dz3f23fcxdgJBb5GauUmk0FmCB3OJFkInsLZDuJBa6TyYztfLbDJVFzdnN5HNnrpLWns6-72xr-RftAr3QK_YJfsXmu0eCjfgM-gXrqBhuD5Lx6OP1zVuuuMkHf-wpmlMQNnEPB-pOH2N6QXiBFY1cYJTweT4rg64yeN7j0_bNLV_EEbl_YB1fccwoBOvqOGlO79YWkvUKL36SNpKSH1vXWim3FCDFHxQPswTiAiDw3TBR2qFFTMBZSk6UfpW93JZ8oiBqYQWVxGouR75bSp0hNFwMKy4y5GnGpI38bBQdeWD9MsLtiMgOQDvtjOafPn-La7AEJR6Et_u5WPnFmKqbxpiLSZZQ6yNVaqPVmoffly9Zq8ob-CjYAS7bMst9th-AHlZ8Q8cEYSNZ2levWHTEe8Mg68ZxicezYL3zYKDWXAwC-7Ngi_nfINZ7LPp-fjq8yQh_oxkBlFkm1gBs7DAg2xIMs8gFDNaqkq5TDmZ25kBebhKODcs5nBxemYUyEgKUyhnC6fkAdteLBfuLeO2UiYVbigrYZXSwmTGZFVliqG2yqp8wE6jBMufASalTCP6LIm8RJGXJPIB0305l63fn5oHMplSPvHfA6-UbiSR5XkKef-AHUUtlTRNf3meVYQcyuThf4z5jr18mDFHbLttbt0xhKOtfU_W9wcsDIS0 |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Victorian+Embarrassment%3A+Consular+Jurisdiction+and+the+Evils+of+Extraterritoriality&rft.jtitle=International+history+review&rft.au=Cobbing%2C+Andrew&rft.date=2018-03-15&rft.pub=Routledge&rft.issn=0707-5332&rft.eissn=1949-6540&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F07075332.2017.1309562&rft.externalDocID=1309562 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0707-5332&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0707-5332&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0707-5332&client=summon |