A comparison of Biobrane vs. homograft for coverage of contaminated burn wounds

An evaluation was made comparing homograft to Biobrane for the coverage of excised burn wounds using a rat model which had been contaminated with 1 × 10 5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1244. The homograft and Biobrane were then covered with either silver sulphadiazine cream, a 5 per cent mafenide acetate s...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in	Burns Vol. 14; no. 5; pp. 409 - 412
Main Authors	Gonce, Sara, Miskell, P., Waymack, J.P.
Format	Journal Article
Language	English
Published	Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.10.1988 Elsevier Science
Subjects	Animals Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Burns Burns - complications Burns - therapy Coated Materials, Biocompatible Medical sciences Occlusive Dressings Pseudomonas Infections - complications Pseudomonas Infections - therapy Rats Rats, Inbred ACI Rats, Inbred Lew Transplantation, Homologous Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents Burn Homograft Skin disease Surgery Comparative study
Online Access	Get full text

Cover

Loading…

Abstract	An evaluation was made comparing homograft to Biobrane for the coverage of excised burn wounds using a rat model which had been contaminated with 1 × 10 5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1244. The homograft and Biobrane were then covered with either silver sulphadiazine cream, a 5 per cent mafenide acetate solution, or no topical antibacterial agent. Five days later the wounds were examined to determine the percentage of graft take. The homograft was found to have a superior graft take in this model. It is therefore recommended that a surgeon using Biobrane for the first time ensures the wound is at least as free of bacterial contamination as he would if he were using homograft.
AbstractList	An evaluation was made comparing homograft to Biobrane for the coverage of excised burn wounds using a rat model which had been contaminated with 1 × 10 5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1244. The homograft and Biobrane were then covered with either silver sulphadiazine cream, a 5 per cent mafenide acetate solution, or no topical antibacterial agent. Five days later the wounds were examined to determine the percentage of graft take. The homograft was found to have a superior graft take in this model. It is therefore recommended that a surgeon using Biobrane for the first time ensures the wound is at least as free of bacterial contamination as he would if he were using homograft. An evaluation was made comparing homograft to Biobrane for the coverage of excised burn wounds using a rat model which had been contaminated with 1 x 10(5) Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1244. The homograft and Biobrane were then covered with either silver sulphadiazine cream, a 5 per cent mafenide acetate solution, or no topical antibacterial agent. Five days later the wounds were examined to determine the percentage of graft take. The homograft was found to have a superior graft take in this model. It is therefore recommended that a surgeon using Biobrane for the first time ensures the wound is at least as free of bacterial contamination as he would if he were using homograft.
Author	Miskell, P. Waymack, J.P. Gonce, Sara
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Sara surname: Gonce fullname: Gonce, Sara – sequence: 2 givenname: P. surname: Miskell fullname: Miskell, P. – sequence: 3 givenname: J.P. surname: Waymack fullname: Waymack, J.P.
BackLink	http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6994828$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3265886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNp9kEtPAjEUhRujQUD_gSazcKGLwZbp9LExQeIrIWGj66avwRqmJe2A8d_bEcLSu7mL852be84InPrgLQBXCE4QROQeVrAuMaL8lrE7DiGqSnoChohRXiIM-SkYHpFzMErpC-apGRyAQTUlNWNkCJazQod2I6NLwRehKR5dUFF6W-zSpPgMbVhF2XRFE2IGdzbKle0xHXwnW-dlZ02httEX32HrTboAZ41cJ3t52GPw8fz0Pn8tF8uXt_lsUeqqrruS4PwB4g2BuqJcS50DGYst5NQipSnBFCFTG0glRAhjDJVWktSITZVUhlZjgPd3dQwpRduITXStjD8CQdHXI_rsos8uGBN_9Yjedr23bbaqteZoOvSR9ZuDLpOW6yY3oV06YoRzzKYsYw97zOaIO2ejSNpZr61x0epOmOD-_-MXWuqCDA
CODEN	BURND8
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_11622_smedj_2017116 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0b013e318256ff99 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0305_4179_96_00081_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_burns_2004_03_013 crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0b013e31806bf446 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clindermatol_2004_07_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biomaterials_2012_05_068 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_burns_2006_11_017 crossref_primary_10_1191_1460408604ta303oa crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clindermatol_2004_07_027 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1447_0756_2006_00454_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_burns_2017_09_015 crossref_primary_10_1177_1534734620904566 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_burns_2014_10_003 crossref_primary_10_24017_science_2016_1_1_8 crossref_primary_10_1097_01_sap_0000182652_88669_a6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_burns_2017_03_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmig_2017_08_005
Cites_doi	10.1097/00004630-198305000-00007 10.1097/00005373-198702000-00010 10.1016/0305-4179(84)90081-0 10.1097/00005373-198210000-00005
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	1988 1989 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml	– notice: 1988 – notice: 1989 INIST-CNRS
DBID	IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION
DOI	10.1016/0305-4179(88)90013-7
DatabaseName	Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef
DatabaseTitle	MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList	MEDLINE
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Medicine
EISSN	1879-1409
EndPage	412
ExternalDocumentID	10_1016_0305_4179_88_90013_7 3265886 6994828 0305417988900137
Genre	Journal Article Comparative Study
GroupedDBID	--- --K --M .1- .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 23N 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AAXUO ABBQC ABJNI ABLVK ABMAC ABMZM ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACIUM ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD AEBSH AEKER AENEX AEVXI AFCTW AFKWA AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJRQY AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HDV HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LCYCR LX1 M27 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OA0 OAUVE OM- OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UHS UV1 Z5R ZCG ZGI ~G- 08R ABPIF AKALU IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAXKI AAYXX AFJKZ AKRWK CITATION
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-6432619f60c379cac016de4e097e1bc764711d5d07a0114440bcba65182babd73
ISSN	0305-4179
IngestDate	Thu Sep 26 17:12:20 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 18 12:03:41 EDT 2021 Sun Oct 29 17:09:27 EDT 2023 Fri Feb 23 02:29:10 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	5
Keywords	Burn Homograft Skin disease Surgery Comparative study
Language	English
License	CC BY 4.0
LinkModel	OpenURL
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c355t-6432619f60c379cac016de4e097e1bc764711d5d07a0114440bcba65182babd73
PMID	3265886
PageCount	4
ParticipantIDs	crossref_primary_10_1016_0305_4179_88_90013_7 pubmed_primary_3265886 pascalfrancis_primary_6994828 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_0305_4179_88_90013_7
PublicationCentury	1900
PublicationDate	1988-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	1988-10-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 10 year: 1988 text: 1988-10-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	1980
PublicationPlace	Oxford
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Oxford – name: England
PublicationTitle	Burns
PublicationTitleAlternate	Burns Incl Therm Inj
PublicationYear	1988
Publisher	Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Science
Publisher_xml	– name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier Science
References	Hansbrough, Zapata-Sirvent, Carrol (BIB3) 1984; 10 Frank, Wachtel, Frank (BIB2) 1983; 4 Purdue, Hunt, Gillespie (BIB4) 1987; 27 Frank, Wachtel, Frank (BIB1) 1981; 32 Zachary, Heggers, Robson (BIB5) 1982; 22 Frank (10.1016/0305-4179(88)90013-7_BIB1) 1981; 32 Frank (10.1016/0305-4179(88)90013-7_BIB2) 1983; 4 Hansbrough (10.1016/0305-4179(88)90013-7_BIB3) 1984; 10 Purdue (10.1016/0305-4179(88)90013-7_BIB4) 1987; 27 Zachary (10.1016/0305-4179(88)90013-7_BIB5) 1982; 22
References_xml	– volume: 32 start-page: 522 year: 1981 ident: BIB1 article-title: Comparison of Biobrane, porcine, and human allograft as biologic dressings for burn wounds publication-title: Surg. Forum contributor: fullname: Frank – volume: 27 start-page: 155 year: 1987 ident: BIB4 article-title: Biosynthetic skin substitute versus frozen human cadaver allograft for temporary coverage of excised burn wounds publication-title: J. Trauma contributor: fullname: Gillespie – volume: 22 start-page: 833 year: 1982 ident: BIB5 article-title: The use of topical antimicrobials combined with Biobrane in burn wound infections publication-title: J. Trauma contributor: fullname: Robson – volume: 10 start-page: 415 year: 1984 ident: BIB3 article-title: Clinical experience with Biobrane biosynthetic dressing in the treatment of partial-thickness burns publication-title: Burns contributor: fullname: Carrol – volume: 4 start-page: 186 year: 1983 ident: BIB2 article-title: Comparison of Biobrane, porcine, and human allograft as biologic dressings for burn wounds publication-title: J. Burn Care Rehabil. contributor: fullname: Frank – volume: 4 start-page: 186 year: 1983 ident: 10.1016/0305-4179(88)90013-7_BIB2 article-title: Comparison of Biobrane, porcine, and human allograft as biologic dressings for burn wounds publication-title: J. Burn Care Rehabil. doi: 10.1097/00004630-198305000-00007 contributor: fullname: Frank – volume: 32 start-page: 522 year: 1981 ident: 10.1016/0305-4179(88)90013-7_BIB1 article-title: Comparison of Biobrane, porcine, and human allograft as biologic dressings for burn wounds publication-title: Surg. Forum contributor: fullname: Frank – volume: 27 start-page: 155 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/0305-4179(88)90013-7_BIB4 article-title: Biosynthetic skin substitute versus frozen human cadaver allograft for temporary coverage of excised burn wounds publication-title: J. Trauma doi: 10.1097/00005373-198702000-00010 contributor: fullname: Purdue – volume: 10 start-page: 415 year: 1984 ident: 10.1016/0305-4179(88)90013-7_BIB3 article-title: Clinical experience with Biobrane biosynthetic dressing in the treatment of partial-thickness burns publication-title: Burns doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(84)90081-0 contributor: fullname: Hansbrough – volume: 22 start-page: 833 year: 1982 ident: 10.1016/0305-4179(88)90013-7_BIB5 article-title: The use of topical antimicrobials combined with Biobrane in burn wound infections publication-title: J. Trauma doi: 10.1097/00005373-198210000-00005 contributor: fullname: Zachary
SSID	ssj0000580 ssj0060438
Score	1.4039179
Snippet	An evaluation was made comparing homograft to Biobrane for the coverage of excised burn wounds using a rat model which had been contaminated with 1 × 10 5... An evaluation was made comparing homograft to Biobrane for the coverage of excised burn wounds using a rat model which had been contaminated with 1 x 10(5)...
SourceID	crossref pubmed pascalfrancis elsevier
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher
StartPage	409
SubjectTerms	Animals Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Burns Burns - complications Burns - therapy Coated Materials, Biocompatible Medical sciences Occlusive Dressings Pseudomonas Infections - complications Pseudomonas Infections - therapy Rats Rats, Inbred ACI Rats, Inbred Lew Transplantation, Homologous Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
Title	A comparison of Biobrane vs. homograft for coverage of contaminated burn wounds
URI	https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-4179(88)90013-7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3265886
Volume	14
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link	http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEF7RVkJICPGqSKHVHkACRS5O7X34aEWBQuqAoFXLydqXBYcmFTFF4tcz4107cQEVuFjJxs4mM59nvtmd8RDyFFiFZUJAmMqUiYDfski6AxuNtLHWcm64wwX9YsYPT9K3Z-xslcTeVJfUet_8-G1dyf9oFcZAr1gl-w-a7b4UBuA16BeOoGE4_pWO85BCHtoIDvWXBQS_QBsvl8PPi3PMvKrqJpHQYKam8gsEmJ2uMAMGySbIdD78jr2Vlr39XRju2Pbrd7PxpLdMWrz5OJ0cHfXqw07zT0U-njaw2A_D1tfXSdklpoU1rrbOJZiWNXMEliHCfmXec3hzKUUW4SOzevY0XcMNWzOO7Xnez6Y-ffoXE-5XE7rZgGdL-QydJvahECu31W7VX_FmXY4hz7IUwskNsnUANgiM31Y-_XA6XbnpZv_Xv-G4H-r3m_ysbZHliL_sxp5L-SL8ij-RmNsXagm3VuV7olyJVBrGcnyX3AmhBs09bu6RG25-n9wsQjLFAzLL6Qo-dFHRFj70ckk7-FCAD23hg2etw4cifKiHz0Ny8mpyPD6MQnuNyADJrCPgohg-Vzw2iciMMvBvrUtdnAkHt6rgwFtGltlYKIya0zTWRivOICLVSluRbJPN-WLuHhEau0pXyYgZbNvClVYqYcJyoZJEpC5JByRq5VVe-KeolG16Icq3RPmWUpaNfEsxIKIVahmYoGd4JaDkmit3ezropgtwGJBtr5PuAxACk5LvXHPhY3Jrdbs8IZv1129uF_horfcCsvbIxux98RNjb4Kq
link.rule.ids	315,783,787,27936,27937
linkProvider	Library Specific Holdings
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+comparison+of+biobrane+vs+homograft+for+coverage+of+contaminated+burn+wounds&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=GONCE%2C+S&rft.au=MISKELL%2C+P&rft.au=WAYMACK%2C+J.+P&rft.date=1988-10-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Science&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2F0305-4179%2888%2990013-7&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=6994828
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0305-4179&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0305-4179&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0305-4179&client=summon