The Effects of a Multimodal Rehabilitation Program on Symptoms and Ground-Reaction Forces in Runners With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

• Published in: Journal of sport rehabilitation Vol. 25; no. 1; p. 23
• Main Authors: Esculier, Jean-Francois, Bouyer, Laurent J, Roy, Jean-Sébastien
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.02.2016
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Biomechanical Phenomena; Combined Modality Therapy; Directive Counseling; Exercise Movement Techniques; Exercise Therapy - methods; Foot - physiology; Humans; Middle Aged; Muscle Strength; Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology; Pain Measurement; Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome - complications; Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome - rehabilitation; Quadriceps Muscle - physiology; Resistance Training; Running - injuries; Running - physiology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Symptom Assessment; Weight-Bearing; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1543-3072
• DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2014-0245

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is one of the most frequent running-related injuries. However, few interventions taking into consideration the specificity of running have been shown to be effective in runners with PFP. To evaluate the effects of a multimodal rehabilitation program including lower-limb-strengthening/ motor-control exercises, advice on running biomechanics, and symptoms management on symptoms, strength, and ground-reaction forces in runners with PFP. Pre- to post- quasi-experimental. Gait-analysis laboratory and private physical therapy clinic. 21 runners with PFP (34.1 ± 6.0 y old, symptoms duration 38.1 ± 45.5 mo). An 8-wk multimodal rehabilitation program including lower-limb- and core-strengthening and motor-control exercises, as well as advice on running gait and symptoms management. The Activities of Daily Living Scale of the Knee Outcome Survey (KOS-ADLS) questionnaire and visual analog scales for usual pain (VAS-U), worst pain (VAS-W), and pain during running (VAS-R) were used to assess changes in symptoms and function. Vertical ground-reaction forces (VGRF) during running and lower-limb isometric strength were also measured. Statistically and clinically significant improvements (P < .001) were reported on KOS-ADLS (+17.8 pts), VAS-U (-19.2 pts), VAS-W (-28.7 pts), and VAS-R (-32.2 pts) after the intervention. No significant changes in isometric strength were observed. The instantaneous vertical loading rate was decreased after the intervention (P = .002), and this reduction was correlated with changes in KOS-ADLS scores (P = .028). This multimodal intervention was successful in reducing pain and improving function of runners with PFP. However, no significant changes in lower-limb strength were observed. It appears that changes in VGRF combined with appropriate training advice could explain the clinical outcomes.