Temporal dynamics of intranasal oxytocin in human brain electrophysiology

Abstract Oxytocin (OT) is a key modulator of human social cognition, popular in behavioral neuroscience. To adequately design and interpret intranasal OT (IN-OT) research, it is crucial to know for how long it affects human brain function once administered. However, this has been mostly deduced from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) Vol. 32; no. 14; pp. 3110 - 3126
Main Authors Zelenina, Marie, Kosilo, Maciej, da Cruz, Janir, Antunes, Marília, Figueiredo, Patrícia, Mehta, Mitul A, Prata, Diana
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Oxford University Press 12.07.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Oxytocin (OT) is a key modulator of human social cognition, popular in behavioral neuroscience. To adequately design and interpret intranasal OT (IN-OT) research, it is crucial to know for how long it affects human brain function once administered. However, this has been mostly deduced from peripheral body fluids studies, or uncommonly used dosages. We aimed to characterize IN-OT’s effects on human brain function using resting-state EEG microstates across a typical experimental session duration. Nineteen healthy males participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subject, cross-over design of 24 IU of IN-OT in 12-min windows 15 min-to-1 h 42min after administration. We observed IN-OT effects on all microstates, across the observation span. During eyes-closed, IN-OT increased duration and contribution of A and contribution and occurrence of D, decreased duration and contribution of B and C; and increased transition probability C-to-B and C-to-D. In eyes-open, it increased A-to-C and A-to-D. As microstates A and D have been related to phonological auditory and attentional networks, respectively, we posit IN-OT may tune the brain for reception of external stimuli, particularly of social nature—tentatively supporting current neurocognitive hypotheses of OT. Moreover, we contrast our overall results against a comprehensive literature review of IN-OT time-course effects in the brain, highlighting comparability issues.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Marie Zelenina and Maciej Kosilo authors gave equivalent contribution.
ISSN:1047-3211
1460-2199
1460-2199
DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhab404