“Ultra-light” patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: effects of varying regimens on analgesia and physician workload

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these benefits may depend on the PCEA settings. This study evaluated several regimens for “ultra-light” (0.125%) PCEA with basal continuous infusion (CI)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of obstetric anesthesia Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 223 - 229
Main Authors Carvalho, B., Cohen, S.E., Giarrusso, K., Durbin, M., Riley, E.T., Lipman, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these benefits may depend on the PCEA settings. This study evaluated several regimens for “ultra-light” (0.125%) PCEA with basal continuous infusion (CI) in labor with goals of minimizing physician interventions while providing good analgesia. Two hundred and twenty ASA I-II women receiving epidural analgesia during active labor (cervical dilation <5 cm) were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to four treatment groups ( n = 30 in each). Analgesia was maintained with a PCEA/CI pump using bupivacaine 0.0625% + sufentanil 0.35 μg/mL. PCEA settings were: group A: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group B: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout; group C: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group D: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout. In groups A, B, C and D, 76, 77, 75 and 85% of parturients respectively, required no physician rescue boluses. Pain scores were low and maternal satisfaction was high in all groups, with minimal differences among them. Spontaneous vaginal delivery occurred in 78% of patients overall, instrumental (forceps or vacuum) delivery in 10% and cesarean section in 12%. These ultra-light PCEA regimens provided excellent analgesia with minimal physician workload and a high spontaneous delivery rate. Use of moderate to high-volume, ultra-light PCEA/CI techniques should facilitate provision of labor analgesia in busy obstetric units.
AbstractList Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these benefits may depend on the PCEA settings. This study evaluated several regimens for “ultra-light” (0.125%) PCEA with basal continuous infusion (CI) in labor with goals of minimizing physician interventions while providing good analgesia. Two hundred and twenty ASA I-II women receiving epidural analgesia during active labor (cervical dilation <5 cm) were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to four treatment groups ( n = 30 in each). Analgesia was maintained with a PCEA/CI pump using bupivacaine 0.0625% + sufentanil 0.35 μg/mL. PCEA settings were: group A: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group B: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout; group C: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group D: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout. In groups A, B, C and D, 76, 77, 75 and 85% of parturients respectively, required no physician rescue boluses. Pain scores were low and maternal satisfaction was high in all groups, with minimal differences among them. Spontaneous vaginal delivery occurred in 78% of patients overall, instrumental (forceps or vacuum) delivery in 10% and cesarean section in 12%. These ultra-light PCEA regimens provided excellent analgesia with minimal physician workload and a high spontaneous delivery rate. Use of moderate to high-volume, ultra-light PCEA/CI techniques should facilitate provision of labor analgesia in busy obstetric units.
BACKGROUNDPatient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these benefits may depend on the PCEA settings. This study evaluated several regimens for "ultra-light" (0.125%) PCEA with basal continuous infusion (CI) in labor with goals of minimizing physician interventions while providing good analgesia.METHODSTwo hundred and twenty ASA I-II women receiving epidural analgesia during active labor (cervical dilation <5 cm) were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to four treatment groups (n=30 in each). Analgesia was maintained with a PCEA/CI pump using bupivacaine 0.0625% + sufentanil 0.35 microg/mL. PCEA settings were: group A: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group B: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout; group C: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group D: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout.RESULTSIn groups A, B, C and D, 76, 77, 75 and 85% of parturients respectively, required no physician rescue boluses. Pain scores were low and maternal satisfaction was high in all groups, with minimal differences among them. Spontaneous vaginal delivery occurred in 78% of patients overall, instrumental (forceps or vacuum) delivery in 10% and cesarean section in 12%.CONCLUSIONSThese ultra-light PCEA regimens provided excellent analgesia with minimal physician workload and a high spontaneous delivery rate. Use of moderate to high-volume, ultra-light PCEA/CI techniques should facilitate provision of labor analgesia in busy obstetric units.
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these benefits may depend on the PCEA settings. This study evaluated several regimens for "ultra-light" (0.125%) PCEA with basal continuous infusion (CI) in labor with goals of minimizing physician interventions while providing good analgesia. Two hundred and twenty ASA I-II women receiving epidural analgesia during active labor (cervical dilation <5 cm) were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to four treatment groups (n=30 in each). Analgesia was maintained with a PCEA/CI pump using bupivacaine 0.0625% + sufentanil 0.35 microg/mL. PCEA settings were: group A: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group B: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout; group C: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group D: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout. In groups A, B, C and D, 76, 77, 75 and 85% of parturients respectively, required no physician rescue boluses. Pain scores were low and maternal satisfaction was high in all groups, with minimal differences among them. Spontaneous vaginal delivery occurred in 78% of patients overall, instrumental (forceps or vacuum) delivery in 10% and cesarean section in 12%. These ultra-light PCEA regimens provided excellent analgesia with minimal physician workload and a high spontaneous delivery rate. Use of moderate to high-volume, ultra-light PCEA/CI techniques should facilitate provision of labor analgesia in busy obstetric units.
Author Riley, E.T.
Durbin, M.
Lipman, S.
Carvalho, B.
Giarrusso, K.
Cohen, S.E.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: B.
  surname: Carvalho
  fullname: Carvalho, B.
  email: bcarvalho@stanford.edu
– sequence: 2
  givenname: S.E.
  surname: Cohen
  fullname: Cohen, S.E.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: K.
  surname: Giarrusso
  fullname: Giarrusso, K.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: M.
  surname: Durbin
  fullname: Durbin, M.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: E.T.
  surname: Riley
  fullname: Riley, E.T.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: S.
  surname: Lipman
  fullname: Lipman, S.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15935646$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kL1uFDEUhS0URDaBF6BAruhm8M_YM0Y0KOJPikRDJDrLY9_ZePHagz0blC4Nb5G8XJ4Er3YlqKiu7r3nHOl8Z-gkpggIvaSkpYTKN5vWb5JpGSGiJawlhD9BKyo4azjvuxO0Ikqohg3q-yk6K2VDCFF8kM_QKRWKC9nJFfr9eHd_FZZsmuDX18vj3QOezeIhLo1NcckpBHAYZu922QRsoglrKN7guvu4xsGMKb_FME1gl4LThG9Mvt1_Mqz9FmK9xX9sJjo8X98Wb72J-FfKP0Iy7jl6OplQ4MVxnqOrjx--XXxuLr9--nLx_rKxXHRLI4nhA4WB0bpyPjEhJ9ONo3W2d7YbB-lAca76TsDkOBmkGeUwqpEJy7t-4Ofo9SF3zunnDsqit75YCMFESLuiZa9UR4WoQnYQ2pxKyTDpOfttbaYp0Xv4eqP38PUeviZMV_jV9OqYvhu34P5ajrSr4N1BALXjjYesi62oLTifKz7tkv9f_h9k6pxZ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_S1280_4703_07_70482_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2006_03_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_0771_07_70313_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_0771_17_85852_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2006_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redare_2017_05_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_annfar_2006_02_012
crossref_primary_10_1213_ane_0b013e3181951a7f
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2009_11_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0246_0289_06_30083_7
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2044_2010_06616_x
crossref_primary_10_1213_ane_0b013e3181887ffb
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_0771_12_63257_5
crossref_primary_10_1097_01_aoa_0000452197_85521_fe
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2008_06_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpain_2007_07_002
crossref_primary_10_56126_71_2_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2007_02_007
crossref_primary_10_1097_AIA_0b013e31802b8b90
crossref_primary_10_1097_AJP_0000000000000106
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2011_06_041
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2015_11_005
crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000001204
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redar_2016_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12630_013_9976_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2006_03_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1280_4703_12_63386_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pratan_2008_12_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0246_0289_12_32169_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1280_4703_17_85628_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00540_014_1910_y
Cites_doi 10.1007/BF03010618
10.1177/0310057X9101900106
10.1213/00000539-199407000-00015
10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00207.x
10.1097/00000542-200205000-00015
10.1213/00000539-200002000-00017
10.1097/00000542-199707000-00018
10.1213/00000539-199111000-00006
10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb13168.x
10.1213/00000539-199003000-00005
10.1093/bja/89.3.459
10.1097/00000542-200204001-00078
10.1007/BF03037032
10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.008
10.1097/00000542-200104001-00060
10.1097/00000542-200212000-00032
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2005 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2005 Elsevier Ltd
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1532-3374
EndPage 229
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_ijoa_2005_02_003
15935646
S0959289X05000324
Genre Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAWTL
AAXUO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABLVK
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
AEBSH
AEKER
AENEX
AEVXI
AFCTW
AFKWA
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AJRQY
AJUYK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CAG
COF
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HDV
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LCYCR
LX1
M29
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
O90
OAUVE
OL-
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UV1
WUQ
Z5R
~G-
AAXKI
AFJKZ
AKRWK
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-60a381e82135433f256fa4bbcdc7dc4b86de9339745efd3086ab68b9b25c34783
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 0959-289X
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 04:06:50 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 26 15:42:30 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:44:06 EDT 2024
Fri Feb 23 02:28:16 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Labor
Analgesia
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c354t-60a381e82135433f256fa4bbcdc7dc4b86de9339745efd3086ab68b9b25c34783
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
PMID 15935646
PQID 67994155
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_67994155
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2005_02_003
pubmed_primary_15935646
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijoa_2005_02_003
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2005-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2005
  text: 2005-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
PublicationTitle International journal of obstetric anesthesia
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Obstet Anesth
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References Gambling, McMorland, Yu, Laszlo (bib5) 1990; 70
Wilson, Cooper, MacArthur, Shennan (bib15) 2002; 97
Hawkins, Gibbs, Orleans, Martin-Salvaj, Beaty (bib7) 1997; 87
Cohen, Denenberg, Bokhari (bib18) 2002; 96
Viscomi, Eisenach (bib6) 1991; 77
Gambling, Yu, Cole, McMorland, Palmer (bib4) 1988; 35
Lyons, Gorton, Robinson, Columb (bib13) 2001; 94
Petry, Vercauteren, Van Mol, Van Houwe, Adriaensen (bib16) 2000; 51
Ferrante, Rosinia, Gordon, Datta (bib10) 1994; 79
Gambling, Huber, Berkowitz (bib11) 1993; 40
Polley, Columb, Naughton, Wagner (bib17) 2002; 96
Bernard, Le Roux, Vizquel (bib8) 2000; 90
Ferrante, Lu, Jamison, Datta (bib2) 1991; 73
van der Vyver, Halpern, Joseph (bib1) 2002; 89
Paech (bib9) 1991; 19
Ewen, McLeod, MacLeod, Campbell, Tunstall (bib14) 1986; 41
Ledin Eriksson, Gentele, Olofsson (bib3) 2003; 47
Stratmann, Gambling, Moeller-Bertram, Stackpole, Pue, Berkowitz (bib12) 2005; 14
16798466 - Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006 Jul;15(3):262; author reply 262-3
Gambling (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib5) 1990; 70
Ewen (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib14) 1986; 41
Ledin Eriksson (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib3) 2003; 47
Lyons (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib13) 2001; 94
Polley (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib17) 2002; 96
van der Vyver (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib1) 2002; 89
Petry (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib16) 2000; 51
Hawkins (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib7) 1997; 87
Viscomi (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib6) 1991; 77
Bernard (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib8) 2000; 90
Gambling (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib11) 1993; 40
Ferrante (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib2) 1991; 73
Ferrante (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib10) 1994; 79
Cohen (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib18) 2002; 96
Paech (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib9) 1991; 19
Wilson (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib15) 2002; 97
Gambling (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib4) 1988; 35
Stratmann (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib12) 2005; 14
References_xml – volume: 90
  start-page: 328
  year: 2000
  end-page: 332
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: the effects of the increase in bolus and lockout interval
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  contributor:
    fullname: Vizquel
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1567
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1575
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two “mobile” epidural techniques: anesthetic and analgesic efficacy
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  contributor:
    fullname: Shennan
– volume: 89
  start-page: 459
  year: 2002
  end-page: 465
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  contributor:
    fullname: Joseph
– volume: 73
  start-page: 547
  year: 1991
  end-page: 552
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: demand dosing
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  contributor:
    fullname: Datta
– volume: 96
  start-page: P54
  year: 2002
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Comparison of the minimum local analgesic concentrations of bupivacaine for nulliparous and multiparous women in labor
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  contributor:
    fullname: Wagner
– volume: 96
  start-page: P56
  year: 2002
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Epidural-PCA for labor pain: Do multiparae require less epidural medications than primiparae?
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  contributor:
    fullname: Bokhari
– volume: 70
  start-page: 256
  year: 1990
  end-page: 261
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia and conventional intermittent “top-up” injections during labor
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  contributor:
    fullname: Laszlo
– volume: 77
  start-page: 348
  year: 1991
  end-page: 351
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Eisenach
– volume: 87
  start-page: 135
  year: 1997
  end-page: 143
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Obstetric anesthesia work force survey, 1981 versus 1992
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  contributor:
    fullname: Beaty
– volume: 47
  start-page: 1085
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1090
  ident: bib3
  article-title: PCEA compared to continuous epidural infusion in an ultra-low-dose regimen for labor pain relief: a randomized study
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
  contributor:
    fullname: Olofsson
– volume: 19
  start-page: 32
  year: 1991
  end-page: 39
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Epidural analgesia in labour: Constant infusion plus patient-controlled boluses
  publication-title: Anaesth Intensive Care
  contributor:
    fullname: Paech
– volume: 14
  start-page: 200
  year: 2005
  end-page: 207
  ident: bib12
  article-title: A randomized comparison of a five-minute versus fifteen-minute lockout interval for PCEA during labor
  publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth
  contributor:
    fullname: Berkowitz
– volume: 51
  start-page: 163
  year: 2000
  end-page: 166
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Epidural PCA with bupivacaine 0.125%, sufentanil 0.75 microgram and epinephrine 1/800.000 for labor analgesia: is a background infusion beneficial?
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Belg
  contributor:
    fullname: Adriaensen
– volume: 41
  start-page: 143
  year: 1986
  end-page: 147
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Continuous infusion epidural analgesia in obstetrics. A comparison of 0.08% and 0.25% bupivacaine
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
  contributor:
    fullname: Tunstall
– volume: 79
  start-page: 80
  year: 1994
  end-page: 84
  ident: bib10
  article-title: The role of continuous background infusions in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  contributor:
    fullname: Datta
– volume: 40
  start-page: 211
  year: 1993
  end-page: 217
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour: varying bolus dose and lockout interval
  publication-title: Can J Anaesth
  contributor:
    fullname: Berkowitz
– volume: 35
  start-page: 249
  year: 1988
  end-page: 254
  ident: bib4
  article-title: A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour
  publication-title: Can J Anaesth
  contributor:
    fullname: Palmer
– volume: 94
  start-page: A60
  year: 2001
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Comparison of minimum local anesthetic volumes of two concentrations of epidural bupivacaine
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  contributor:
    fullname: Columb
– volume: 35
  start-page: 249
  year: 1988
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib4
  article-title: A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour
  publication-title: Can J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1007/BF03010618
  contributor:
    fullname: Gambling
– volume: 19
  start-page: 32
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib9
  article-title: Epidural analgesia in labour: Constant infusion plus patient-controlled boluses
  publication-title: Anaesth Intensive Care
  doi: 10.1177/0310057X9101900106
  contributor:
    fullname: Paech
– volume: 79
  start-page: 80
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib10
  article-title: The role of continuous background infusions in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/00000539-199407000-00015
  contributor:
    fullname: Ferrante
– volume: 47
  start-page: 1085
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib3
  article-title: PCEA compared to continuous epidural infusion in an ultra-low-dose regimen for labor pain relief: a randomized study
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
  doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00207.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Ledin Eriksson
– volume: 96
  start-page: P54
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib17
  article-title: Comparison of the minimum local analgesic concentrations of bupivacaine for nulliparous and multiparous women in labor
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-200205000-00015
  contributor:
    fullname: Polley
– volume: 90
  start-page: 328
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib8
  article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: the effects of the increase in bolus and lockout interval
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/00000539-200002000-00017
  contributor:
    fullname: Bernard
– volume: 51
  start-page: 163
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib16
  article-title: Epidural PCA with bupivacaine 0.125%, sufentanil 0.75 microgram and epinephrine 1/800.000 for labor analgesia: is a background infusion beneficial?
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Belg
  contributor:
    fullname: Petry
– volume: 77
  start-page: 348
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib6
  article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Viscomi
– volume: 87
  start-page: 135
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib7
  article-title: Obstetric anesthesia work force survey, 1981 versus 1992
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-199707000-00018
  contributor:
    fullname: Hawkins
– volume: 73
  start-page: 547
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib2
  article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: demand dosing
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/00000539-199111000-00006
  contributor:
    fullname: Ferrante
– volume: 41
  start-page: 143
  year: 1986
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib14
  article-title: Continuous infusion epidural analgesia in obstetrics. A comparison of 0.08% and 0.25% bupivacaine
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb13168.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Ewen
– volume: 70
  start-page: 256
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib5
  article-title: Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia and conventional intermittent “top-up” injections during labor
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/00000539-199003000-00005
  contributor:
    fullname: Gambling
– volume: 89
  start-page: 459
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib1
  article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/89.3.459
  contributor:
    fullname: van der Vyver
– volume: 96
  start-page: P56
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib18
  article-title: Epidural-PCA for labor pain: Do multiparae require less epidural medications than primiparae?
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204001-00078
  contributor:
    fullname: Cohen
– volume: 40
  start-page: 211
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib11
  article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour: varying bolus dose and lockout interval
  publication-title: Can J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1007/BF03037032
  contributor:
    fullname: Gambling
– volume: 14
  start-page: 200
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib12
  article-title: A randomized comparison of a five-minute versus fifteen-minute lockout interval for PCEA during labor
  publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.008
  contributor:
    fullname: Stratmann
– volume: 94
  start-page: A60
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib13
  article-title: Comparison of minimum local anesthetic volumes of two concentrations of epidural bupivacaine
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-200104001-00060
  contributor:
    fullname: Lyons
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1567
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib15
  article-title: Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two “mobile” epidural techniques: anesthetic and analgesic efficacy
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-200212000-00032
  contributor:
    fullname: Wilson
SSID ssj0009386
Score 1.8569502
Snippet Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these...
BACKGROUNDPatient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 223
SubjectTerms Adult
Analgesia
Analgesia, Epidural - adverse effects
Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - adverse effects
Anesthetics, Intravenous
Anesthetics, Local
Apgar Score
Bupivacaine
Double-Blind Method
Endpoint Determination
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Labor
Labor, Obstetric
Pain Measurement - drug effects
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Sufentanil
Workload
Title “Ultra-light” patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: effects of varying regimens on analgesia and physician workload
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15935646
https://search.proquest.com/docview/67994155
Volume 14
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtQwEB61WwlxQeV_CxQfuCGzm9hOYm5VRbWA2gustLfIf5FSLclqu-VY9dK3KC_XJ-lM4lA4lAPHRBrF8jgz34xnvgF4h0FFmprEcK1yz9FDaG7TELh3ifboAgudUjfy8Uk2m8svC7XYgsOhF4bKKqPt7216Z63jm0nczcmqriffKIOF4cJiSpz-iAu2YQfdkZQj2Dn4_HV2cse9K7qBj13GiwRi70xf5lWftiamVoi6U9znn-7Dn50fOtqFRxFAsoN-jY9hKzRP4MFxvCJ_Clc3l9fz5WZt-JLi7pvLXyxyp_JYlr4MnoVV7Ylwg5mGBn2c1Yb1DYusOxUfWazzYG3Ffpo19UIxmuHwA6Ne1jZ_iJnGs9_pEUZlXsvW-GcwP_r0_XDG46wF7oSSG55NDfruUKQJPgpRIRKqjLTWeZd7J22R-aAFghepQuUFBkLGZoXVNlVOyLwQz2HUtE14CcwhgsxSm6OokIba1EOibWWcI-IYY8bwftjhctVTapRDrdlpSfqg2ZiqnKZEXDoGNSih_OtglGjz_yn3dtBYiX8MXYOYJrTnZ2WWa00wagwvekXerUJpoTKZ7f3nN1_Bw47ZtavmfQ2jzfo8vEHMsrH7sP3hItmPJ_MWGsbuvQ
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,4521,24144,27955,27956,45618,45712
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwEB2VIgEXRPlcoK0P3JDZ3ThOYm6oarWFbi90pb1Z449IqbbJarvliHrhX8Cf6y_Bkzi0PZRDj4lixco4M2_sN28APoSkIklwjFzJ3PEQIRQ3iffc2bFyIQQWKqFq5OlxNpmlX-dyvgF7fS0M0Sqj7-98euut451h_JrDZVUNv9MOVkgX5iPS9A-44AE8JDRAvK5PP695Hkq07R7b_S56PFbOdCSv6rTBuLFCwp3iruh0F_pso9DBM3ga4SP70s1wCzZ8_RweTeMB-Qv4dXX5e7ZYr5AvKOu-uvzDonIqj6T0hXfMLytHchsMa2rzcV4h68oVWbsmPrPI8mBNyX7giiqhGHVwOAs5L2vqG8Owduzf5ggjkteiQfcSZgf7J3sTHjstcCtkuubZCEPk9kUyDpdClAEHlZgaY53NnU1NkTmvRIAuqfSlEyENQpMVRplEWpHmhXgFm3VT-zfAbMCPWWLyMFSkSEXqfqxMidaSbAziAD72X1gvO0EN3TPNTjXZgzpjSj1KSLZ0ALI3gr61LHTw-P8dt9tbTIf_hQ5BsPbNxbnOcqUIRA3gdWfI61lIJWSWZm_v-c5deDw5mR7po8Pjb-_gSavx2vJ638PmenXhtwN6WZuddnX-BT_S75I
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Ultra-light%22+patient-controlled+epidural+analgesia+during+labor%3A+effects+of+varying+regimens+on+analgesia+and+physician+workload&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+obstetric+anesthesia&rft.au=Carvalho%2C+B&rft.au=Cohen%2C+S+E&rft.au=Giarrusso%2C+K&rft.au=Durbin%2C+M&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.issn=0959-289X&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijoa.2005.02.003&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0959-289X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0959-289X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0959-289X&client=summon