“Ultra-light” patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: effects of varying regimens on analgesia and physician workload
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these benefits may depend on the PCEA settings. This study evaluated several regimens for “ultra-light” (0.125%) PCEA with basal continuous infusion (CI)...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of obstetric anesthesia Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 223 - 229 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier Ltd
01.07.2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these benefits may depend on the PCEA settings. This study evaluated several regimens for “ultra-light” (0.125%) PCEA with basal continuous infusion (CI) in labor with goals of minimizing physician interventions while providing good analgesia.
Two hundred and twenty ASA I-II women receiving epidural analgesia during active labor (cervical dilation <5 cm) were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to four treatment groups (
n
=
30 in each). Analgesia was maintained with a PCEA/CI pump using bupivacaine 0.0625%
+
sufentanil 0.35 μg/mL. PCEA settings were: group A: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group B: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout; group C: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group D: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout.
In groups A, B, C and D, 76, 77, 75 and 85% of parturients respectively, required no physician rescue boluses. Pain scores were low and maternal satisfaction was high in all groups, with minimal differences among them. Spontaneous vaginal delivery occurred in 78% of patients overall, instrumental (forceps or vacuum) delivery in 10% and cesarean section in 12%.
These ultra-light PCEA regimens provided excellent analgesia with minimal physician workload and a high spontaneous delivery rate. Use of moderate to high-volume, ultra-light PCEA/CI techniques should facilitate provision of labor analgesia in busy obstetric units. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these benefits may depend on the PCEA settings. This study evaluated several regimens for “ultra-light” (0.125%) PCEA with basal continuous infusion (CI) in labor with goals of minimizing physician interventions while providing good analgesia.
Two hundred and twenty ASA I-II women receiving epidural analgesia during active labor (cervical dilation <5 cm) were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to four treatment groups (
n
=
30 in each). Analgesia was maintained with a PCEA/CI pump using bupivacaine 0.0625%
+
sufentanil 0.35 μg/mL. PCEA settings were: group A: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group B: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout; group C: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group D: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout.
In groups A, B, C and D, 76, 77, 75 and 85% of parturients respectively, required no physician rescue boluses. Pain scores were low and maternal satisfaction was high in all groups, with minimal differences among them. Spontaneous vaginal delivery occurred in 78% of patients overall, instrumental (forceps or vacuum) delivery in 10% and cesarean section in 12%.
These ultra-light PCEA regimens provided excellent analgesia with minimal physician workload and a high spontaneous delivery rate. Use of moderate to high-volume, ultra-light PCEA/CI techniques should facilitate provision of labor analgesia in busy obstetric units. BACKGROUNDPatient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these benefits may depend on the PCEA settings. This study evaluated several regimens for "ultra-light" (0.125%) PCEA with basal continuous infusion (CI) in labor with goals of minimizing physician interventions while providing good analgesia.METHODSTwo hundred and twenty ASA I-II women receiving epidural analgesia during active labor (cervical dilation <5 cm) were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to four treatment groups (n=30 in each). Analgesia was maintained with a PCEA/CI pump using bupivacaine 0.0625% + sufentanil 0.35 microg/mL. PCEA settings were: group A: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group B: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout; group C: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group D: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout.RESULTSIn groups A, B, C and D, 76, 77, 75 and 85% of parturients respectively, required no physician rescue boluses. Pain scores were low and maternal satisfaction was high in all groups, with minimal differences among them. Spontaneous vaginal delivery occurred in 78% of patients overall, instrumental (forceps or vacuum) delivery in 10% and cesarean section in 12%.CONCLUSIONSThese ultra-light PCEA regimens provided excellent analgesia with minimal physician workload and a high spontaneous delivery rate. Use of moderate to high-volume, ultra-light PCEA/CI techniques should facilitate provision of labor analgesia in busy obstetric units. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these benefits may depend on the PCEA settings. This study evaluated several regimens for "ultra-light" (0.125%) PCEA with basal continuous infusion (CI) in labor with goals of minimizing physician interventions while providing good analgesia. Two hundred and twenty ASA I-II women receiving epidural analgesia during active labor (cervical dilation <5 cm) were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to four treatment groups (n=30 in each). Analgesia was maintained with a PCEA/CI pump using bupivacaine 0.0625% + sufentanil 0.35 microg/mL. PCEA settings were: group A: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group B: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout; group C: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group D: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout. In groups A, B, C and D, 76, 77, 75 and 85% of parturients respectively, required no physician rescue boluses. Pain scores were low and maternal satisfaction was high in all groups, with minimal differences among them. Spontaneous vaginal delivery occurred in 78% of patients overall, instrumental (forceps or vacuum) delivery in 10% and cesarean section in 12%. These ultra-light PCEA regimens provided excellent analgesia with minimal physician workload and a high spontaneous delivery rate. Use of moderate to high-volume, ultra-light PCEA/CI techniques should facilitate provision of labor analgesia in busy obstetric units. |
Author | Riley, E.T. Durbin, M. Lipman, S. Carvalho, B. Giarrusso, K. Cohen, S.E. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: B. surname: Carvalho fullname: Carvalho, B. email: bcarvalho@stanford.edu – sequence: 2 givenname: S.E. surname: Cohen fullname: Cohen, S.E. – sequence: 3 givenname: K. surname: Giarrusso fullname: Giarrusso, K. – sequence: 4 givenname: M. surname: Durbin fullname: Durbin, M. – sequence: 5 givenname: E.T. surname: Riley fullname: Riley, E.T. – sequence: 6 givenname: S. surname: Lipman fullname: Lipman, S. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15935646$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kL1uFDEUhS0URDaBF6BAruhm8M_YM0Y0KOJPikRDJDrLY9_ZePHagz0blC4Nb5G8XJ4Er3YlqKiu7r3nHOl8Z-gkpggIvaSkpYTKN5vWb5JpGSGiJawlhD9BKyo4azjvuxO0Ikqohg3q-yk6K2VDCFF8kM_QKRWKC9nJFfr9eHd_FZZsmuDX18vj3QOezeIhLo1NcckpBHAYZu922QRsoglrKN7guvu4xsGMKb_FME1gl4LThG9Mvt1_Mqz9FmK9xX9sJjo8X98Wb72J-FfKP0Iy7jl6OplQ4MVxnqOrjx--XXxuLr9--nLx_rKxXHRLI4nhA4WB0bpyPjEhJ9ONo3W2d7YbB-lAca76TsDkOBmkGeUwqpEJy7t-4Ofo9SF3zunnDsqit75YCMFESLuiZa9UR4WoQnYQ2pxKyTDpOfttbaYp0Xv4eqP38PUeviZMV_jV9OqYvhu34P5ajrSr4N1BALXjjYesi62oLTifKz7tkv9f_h9k6pxZ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_S1280_4703_07_70482_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2006_03_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_0771_07_70313_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_0771_17_85852_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2006_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redare_2017_05_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_annfar_2006_02_012 crossref_primary_10_1213_ane_0b013e3181951a7f crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2009_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0246_0289_06_30083_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2044_2010_06616_x crossref_primary_10_1213_ane_0b013e3181887ffb crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_0771_12_63257_5 crossref_primary_10_1097_01_aoa_0000452197_85521_fe crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2008_06_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpain_2007_07_002 crossref_primary_10_56126_71_2_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2007_02_007 crossref_primary_10_1097_AIA_0b013e31802b8b90 crossref_primary_10_1097_AJP_0000000000000106 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2011_06_041 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2015_11_005 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000001204 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redar_2016_10_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12630_013_9976_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2006_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1280_4703_12_63386_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pratan_2008_12_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0246_0289_12_32169_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1280_4703_17_85628_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00540_014_1910_y |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/BF03010618 10.1177/0310057X9101900106 10.1213/00000539-199407000-00015 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00207.x 10.1097/00000542-200205000-00015 10.1213/00000539-200002000-00017 10.1097/00000542-199707000-00018 10.1213/00000539-199111000-00006 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb13168.x 10.1213/00000539-199003000-00005 10.1093/bja/89.3.459 10.1097/00000542-200204001-00078 10.1007/BF03037032 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.008 10.1097/00000542-200104001-00060 10.1097/00000542-200212000-00032 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2005 Elsevier Ltd |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2005 Elsevier Ltd |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1532-3374 |
EndPage | 229 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_ijoa_2005_02_003 15935646 S0959289X05000324 |
Genre | Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AAWTL AAXUO ABBQC ABFNM ABJNI ABLVK ABMAC ABMZM ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD AEBSH AEKER AENEX AEVXI AFCTW AFKWA AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJRQY AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CAG COF CS3 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HDV HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LCYCR LX1 M29 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- O90 OAUVE OL- OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAE SDF SDG SEL SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UV1 WUQ Z5R ~G- AAXKI AFJKZ AKRWK CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-60a381e82135433f256fa4bbcdc7dc4b86de9339745efd3086ab68b9b25c34783 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0959-289X |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 16 04:06:50 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 15:42:30 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:44:06 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 02:28:16 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | Labor Analgesia Patient-controlled epidural analgesia |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c354t-60a381e82135433f256fa4bbcdc7dc4b86de9339745efd3086ab68b9b25c34783 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-News-3 content type line 23 |
PMID | 15935646 |
PQID | 67994155 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_67994155 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2005_02_003 pubmed_primary_15935646 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijoa_2005_02_003 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2005-07-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2005-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2005 text: 2005-07-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Netherlands |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Netherlands |
PublicationTitle | International journal of obstetric anesthesia |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Int J Obstet Anesth |
PublicationYear | 2005 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
References | Gambling, McMorland, Yu, Laszlo (bib5) 1990; 70 Wilson, Cooper, MacArthur, Shennan (bib15) 2002; 97 Hawkins, Gibbs, Orleans, Martin-Salvaj, Beaty (bib7) 1997; 87 Cohen, Denenberg, Bokhari (bib18) 2002; 96 Viscomi, Eisenach (bib6) 1991; 77 Gambling, Yu, Cole, McMorland, Palmer (bib4) 1988; 35 Lyons, Gorton, Robinson, Columb (bib13) 2001; 94 Petry, Vercauteren, Van Mol, Van Houwe, Adriaensen (bib16) 2000; 51 Ferrante, Rosinia, Gordon, Datta (bib10) 1994; 79 Gambling, Huber, Berkowitz (bib11) 1993; 40 Polley, Columb, Naughton, Wagner (bib17) 2002; 96 Bernard, Le Roux, Vizquel (bib8) 2000; 90 Ferrante, Lu, Jamison, Datta (bib2) 1991; 73 van der Vyver, Halpern, Joseph (bib1) 2002; 89 Paech (bib9) 1991; 19 Ewen, McLeod, MacLeod, Campbell, Tunstall (bib14) 1986; 41 Ledin Eriksson, Gentele, Olofsson (bib3) 2003; 47 Stratmann, Gambling, Moeller-Bertram, Stackpole, Pue, Berkowitz (bib12) 2005; 14 16798466 - Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006 Jul;15(3):262; author reply 262-3 Gambling (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib5) 1990; 70 Ewen (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib14) 1986; 41 Ledin Eriksson (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib3) 2003; 47 Lyons (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib13) 2001; 94 Polley (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib17) 2002; 96 van der Vyver (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib1) 2002; 89 Petry (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib16) 2000; 51 Hawkins (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib7) 1997; 87 Viscomi (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib6) 1991; 77 Bernard (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib8) 2000; 90 Gambling (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib11) 1993; 40 Ferrante (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib2) 1991; 73 Ferrante (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib10) 1994; 79 Cohen (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib18) 2002; 96 Paech (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib9) 1991; 19 Wilson (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib15) 2002; 97 Gambling (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib4) 1988; 35 Stratmann (10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib12) 2005; 14 |
References_xml | – volume: 90 start-page: 328 year: 2000 end-page: 332 ident: bib8 article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: the effects of the increase in bolus and lockout interval publication-title: Anesth Analg contributor: fullname: Vizquel – volume: 97 start-page: 1567 year: 2002 end-page: 1575 ident: bib15 article-title: Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two “mobile” epidural techniques: anesthetic and analgesic efficacy publication-title: Anesthesiology contributor: fullname: Shennan – volume: 89 start-page: 459 year: 2002 end-page: 465 ident: bib1 article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis publication-title: Br J Anaesth contributor: fullname: Joseph – volume: 73 start-page: 547 year: 1991 end-page: 552 ident: bib2 article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: demand dosing publication-title: Anesth Analg contributor: fullname: Datta – volume: 96 start-page: P54 year: 2002 ident: bib17 article-title: Comparison of the minimum local analgesic concentrations of bupivacaine for nulliparous and multiparous women in labor publication-title: Anesthesiology contributor: fullname: Wagner – volume: 96 start-page: P56 year: 2002 ident: bib18 article-title: Epidural-PCA for labor pain: Do multiparae require less epidural medications than primiparae? publication-title: Anesthesiology contributor: fullname: Bokhari – volume: 70 start-page: 256 year: 1990 end-page: 261 ident: bib5 article-title: Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia and conventional intermittent “top-up” injections during labor publication-title: Anesth Analg contributor: fullname: Laszlo – volume: 77 start-page: 348 year: 1991 end-page: 351 ident: bib6 article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor publication-title: Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Eisenach – volume: 87 start-page: 135 year: 1997 end-page: 143 ident: bib7 article-title: Obstetric anesthesia work force survey, 1981 versus 1992 publication-title: Anesthesiology contributor: fullname: Beaty – volume: 47 start-page: 1085 year: 2003 end-page: 1090 ident: bib3 article-title: PCEA compared to continuous epidural infusion in an ultra-low-dose regimen for labor pain relief: a randomized study publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand contributor: fullname: Olofsson – volume: 19 start-page: 32 year: 1991 end-page: 39 ident: bib9 article-title: Epidural analgesia in labour: Constant infusion plus patient-controlled boluses publication-title: Anaesth Intensive Care contributor: fullname: Paech – volume: 14 start-page: 200 year: 2005 end-page: 207 ident: bib12 article-title: A randomized comparison of a five-minute versus fifteen-minute lockout interval for PCEA during labor publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth contributor: fullname: Berkowitz – volume: 51 start-page: 163 year: 2000 end-page: 166 ident: bib16 article-title: Epidural PCA with bupivacaine 0.125%, sufentanil 0.75 microgram and epinephrine 1/800.000 for labor analgesia: is a background infusion beneficial? publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Belg contributor: fullname: Adriaensen – volume: 41 start-page: 143 year: 1986 end-page: 147 ident: bib14 article-title: Continuous infusion epidural analgesia in obstetrics. A comparison of 0.08% and 0.25% bupivacaine publication-title: Anaesthesia contributor: fullname: Tunstall – volume: 79 start-page: 80 year: 1994 end-page: 84 ident: bib10 article-title: The role of continuous background infusions in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery publication-title: Anesth Analg contributor: fullname: Datta – volume: 40 start-page: 211 year: 1993 end-page: 217 ident: bib11 article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour: varying bolus dose and lockout interval publication-title: Can J Anaesth contributor: fullname: Berkowitz – volume: 35 start-page: 249 year: 1988 end-page: 254 ident: bib4 article-title: A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour publication-title: Can J Anaesth contributor: fullname: Palmer – volume: 94 start-page: A60 year: 2001 ident: bib13 article-title: Comparison of minimum local anesthetic volumes of two concentrations of epidural bupivacaine publication-title: Anesthesiology contributor: fullname: Columb – volume: 35 start-page: 249 year: 1988 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib4 article-title: A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour publication-title: Can J Anaesth doi: 10.1007/BF03010618 contributor: fullname: Gambling – volume: 19 start-page: 32 year: 1991 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib9 article-title: Epidural analgesia in labour: Constant infusion plus patient-controlled boluses publication-title: Anaesth Intensive Care doi: 10.1177/0310057X9101900106 contributor: fullname: Paech – volume: 79 start-page: 80 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib10 article-title: The role of continuous background infusions in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/00000539-199407000-00015 contributor: fullname: Ferrante – volume: 47 start-page: 1085 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib3 article-title: PCEA compared to continuous epidural infusion in an ultra-low-dose regimen for labor pain relief: a randomized study publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00207.x contributor: fullname: Ledin Eriksson – volume: 96 start-page: P54 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib17 article-title: Comparison of the minimum local analgesic concentrations of bupivacaine for nulliparous and multiparous women in labor publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-200205000-00015 contributor: fullname: Polley – volume: 90 start-page: 328 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib8 article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: the effects of the increase in bolus and lockout interval publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/00000539-200002000-00017 contributor: fullname: Bernard – volume: 51 start-page: 163 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib16 article-title: Epidural PCA with bupivacaine 0.125%, sufentanil 0.75 microgram and epinephrine 1/800.000 for labor analgesia: is a background infusion beneficial? publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Belg contributor: fullname: Petry – volume: 77 start-page: 348 year: 1991 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib6 article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor publication-title: Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Viscomi – volume: 87 start-page: 135 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib7 article-title: Obstetric anesthesia work force survey, 1981 versus 1992 publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-199707000-00018 contributor: fullname: Hawkins – volume: 73 start-page: 547 year: 1991 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib2 article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: demand dosing publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/00000539-199111000-00006 contributor: fullname: Ferrante – volume: 41 start-page: 143 year: 1986 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib14 article-title: Continuous infusion epidural analgesia in obstetrics. A comparison of 0.08% and 0.25% bupivacaine publication-title: Anaesthesia doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb13168.x contributor: fullname: Ewen – volume: 70 start-page: 256 year: 1990 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib5 article-title: Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia and conventional intermittent “top-up” injections during labor publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/00000539-199003000-00005 contributor: fullname: Gambling – volume: 89 start-page: 459 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib1 article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/89.3.459 contributor: fullname: van der Vyver – volume: 96 start-page: P56 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib18 article-title: Epidural-PCA for labor pain: Do multiparae require less epidural medications than primiparae? publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204001-00078 contributor: fullname: Cohen – volume: 40 start-page: 211 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib11 article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour: varying bolus dose and lockout interval publication-title: Can J Anaesth doi: 10.1007/BF03037032 contributor: fullname: Gambling – volume: 14 start-page: 200 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib12 article-title: A randomized comparison of a five-minute versus fifteen-minute lockout interval for PCEA during labor publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.008 contributor: fullname: Stratmann – volume: 94 start-page: A60 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib13 article-title: Comparison of minimum local anesthetic volumes of two concentrations of epidural bupivacaine publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-200104001-00060 contributor: fullname: Lyons – volume: 97 start-page: 1567 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003_bib15 article-title: Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two “mobile” epidural techniques: anesthetic and analgesic efficacy publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-200212000-00032 contributor: fullname: Wilson |
SSID | ssj0009386 |
Score | 1.8569502 |
Snippet | Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these... BACKGROUNDPatient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 223 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Analgesia Analgesia, Epidural - adverse effects Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - adverse effects Anesthetics, Intravenous Anesthetics, Local Apgar Score Bupivacaine Double-Blind Method Endpoint Determination Female Humans Infant, Newborn Labor Labor, Obstetric Pain Measurement - drug effects Patient-controlled epidural analgesia Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Sufentanil Workload |
Title | “Ultra-light” patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: effects of varying regimens on analgesia and physician workload |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.02.003 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15935646 https://search.proquest.com/docview/67994155 |
Volume | 14 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtQwEB61WwlxQeV_CxQfuCGzm9hOYm5VRbWA2gustLfIf5FSLclqu-VY9dK3KC_XJ-lM4lA4lAPHRBrF8jgz34xnvgF4h0FFmprEcK1yz9FDaG7TELh3ifboAgudUjfy8Uk2m8svC7XYgsOhF4bKKqPt7216Z63jm0nczcmqriffKIOF4cJiSpz-iAu2YQfdkZQj2Dn4_HV2cse9K7qBj13GiwRi70xf5lWftiamVoi6U9znn-7Dn50fOtqFRxFAsoN-jY9hKzRP4MFxvCJ_Clc3l9fz5WZt-JLi7pvLXyxyp_JYlr4MnoVV7Ylwg5mGBn2c1Yb1DYusOxUfWazzYG3Ffpo19UIxmuHwA6Ne1jZ_iJnGs9_pEUZlXsvW-GcwP_r0_XDG46wF7oSSG55NDfruUKQJPgpRIRKqjLTWeZd7J22R-aAFghepQuUFBkLGZoXVNlVOyLwQz2HUtE14CcwhgsxSm6OokIba1EOibWWcI-IYY8bwftjhctVTapRDrdlpSfqg2ZiqnKZEXDoGNSih_OtglGjz_yn3dtBYiX8MXYOYJrTnZ2WWa00wagwvekXerUJpoTKZ7f3nN1_Bw47ZtavmfQ2jzfo8vEHMsrH7sP3hItmPJ_MWGsbuvQ |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,4521,24144,27955,27956,45618,45712 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwEB2VIgEXRPlcoK0P3JDZ3ThOYm6oarWFbi90pb1Z449IqbbJarvliHrhX8Cf6y_Bkzi0PZRDj4lixco4M2_sN28APoSkIklwjFzJ3PEQIRQ3iffc2bFyIQQWKqFq5OlxNpmlX-dyvgF7fS0M0Sqj7-98euut451h_JrDZVUNv9MOVkgX5iPS9A-44AE8JDRAvK5PP695Hkq07R7b_S56PFbOdCSv6rTBuLFCwp3iruh0F_pso9DBM3ga4SP70s1wCzZ8_RweTeMB-Qv4dXX5e7ZYr5AvKOu-uvzDonIqj6T0hXfMLytHchsMa2rzcV4h68oVWbsmPrPI8mBNyX7giiqhGHVwOAs5L2vqG8Owduzf5ggjkteiQfcSZgf7J3sTHjstcCtkuubZCEPk9kUyDpdClAEHlZgaY53NnU1NkTmvRIAuqfSlEyENQpMVRplEWpHmhXgFm3VT-zfAbMCPWWLyMFSkSEXqfqxMidaSbAziAD72X1gvO0EN3TPNTjXZgzpjSj1KSLZ0ALI3gr61LHTw-P8dt9tbTIf_hQ5BsPbNxbnOcqUIRA3gdWfI61lIJWSWZm_v-c5deDw5mR7po8Pjb-_gSavx2vJ638PmenXhtwN6WZuddnX-BT_S75I |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Ultra-light%22+patient-controlled+epidural+analgesia+during+labor%3A+effects+of+varying+regimens+on+analgesia+and+physician+workload&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+obstetric+anesthesia&rft.au=Carvalho%2C+B&rft.au=Cohen%2C+S+E&rft.au=Giarrusso%2C+K&rft.au=Durbin%2C+M&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.issn=0959-289X&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijoa.2005.02.003&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0959-289X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0959-289X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0959-289X&client=summon |