Consumer Perception of Skinning Injury in Sweetpotatoes and Implications for Marketability: An Experimental Auction

• Published in: HortTechnology (Alexandria, Va.) Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 468 - 475
• Main Authors: Collart, Alba J., Meyers, Stephen L., Ward, Jason K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS) 01.08.2019
• Subjects: ipomoea batatas; willingness-to-pay
• DOI: 10.21273/HORTTECH04355-19
• ISSN: 1063-0198

Skinning of sweetpotato ( Ipomoea batatas ) storage roots is one of the greatest concerns of sweetpotato producers. Although skinning injury is very common, the severity of the injury can vary widely. At an undefined threshold, sweetpotatoes with skinning injury are no longer sold for fresh consumption. The objectives of this study were to examine how skinning injury influences consumers’ willingness-to-pay (WTP) for sweetpotatoes and to identify differences in valuations when the extent of skinning injury is labeled. Image analysis was used to quantify skinning injury and then an incentive-compatible, nonhypothetical laboratory experimental auction was conducted to collect data on consumers’ WTP for five categories of sweetpotatoes: 0% to <1% skinning injury, 1.0% to 3.0%, 3.1% to 5.0%, 5.1% to 7.5%, and 7.6% to 10.0%. On average, consumers were willing to pay the most for sweetpotatoes with 0% to <1% skinning injury (up to $1.51/lb to $1.67/lb) and the least for sweetpotatoes with 7.6% to 10% (up to $0.76/lb to $0.85/lb), yet mean WTP values were nonzero for all skinning levels. Moreover, when the extent of skinning was labeled (relative to when they bid blindly), consumers were willing to pay price premiums for sweetpotatoes with low skinning injury levels (0% to 5%) and discounted sweetpotatoes with the highest skinning injury level (7.6% to 10.0%), suggesting that skinning levels of 7.6% and above may not be acceptable by consumers.