Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopic Glenoid Reconstruction With Subscapularis Tenodesis Results in Promising Clinical Outcomes, but Concerns Regarding Graft Resorption Rates Persist: A Long Way Toward a More Perfect Union

The pros and cons of open and arthroscopic shoulder stabilization procedures have been studied exhaustively. Yet, in many situations, the rates of recurrent instability and overall complications associated with these techniques remain unacceptably high. Perhaps paradoxically, the refinement of arthr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArthroscopy Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 834 - 836
Main Authors Cognetti, Daniel J, Sheean, Andrew J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.03.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The pros and cons of open and arthroscopic shoulder stabilization procedures have been studied exhaustively. Yet, in many situations, the rates of recurrent instability and overall complications associated with these techniques remain unacceptably high. Perhaps paradoxically, the refinement of arthroscopic shoulder stabilization techniques has only intensified the debate between proponents of either open or arthroscopic approaches, and although significant (however "significant" is defined), anteroinferior glenoid bone loss has historically been thought to constitute a relatively strong indication for an open bone augmentation procedure, surgeons, to their great credit, continue to push the limits of what can be accomplished arthroscopically. Arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction has emerged as a viable option that may represent "the best of both worlds." Although modifications to the originally described arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction technique are promising, concerns persist regarding the fate of the graft and the durability of the procedure beyond short-term follow-up.
AbstractList The pros and cons of open and arthroscopic shoulder stabilization procedures have been studied exhaustively. Yet, in many situations, the rates of recurrent instability and overall complications associated with these techniques remain unacceptably high. Perhaps paradoxically, the refinement of arthroscopic shoulder stabilization techniques has only intensified the debate between proponents of either open or arthroscopic approaches, and although significant (however "significant" is defined), anteroinferior glenoid bone loss has historically been thought to constitute a relatively strong indication for an open bone augmentation procedure, surgeons, to their great credit, continue to push the limits of what can be accomplished arthroscopically. Arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction has emerged as a viable option that may represent "the best of both worlds." Although modifications to the originally described arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction technique are promising, concerns persist regarding the fate of the graft and the durability of the procedure beyond short-term follow-up.
Author Cognetti, Daniel J
Sheean, Andrew J
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Daniel J
  surname: Cognetti
  fullname: Cognetti, Daniel J
  organization: San Antonio, Texas
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Andrew J
  surname: Sheean
  fullname: Sheean, Andrew J
  organization: San Antonio, Texas
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo9kVFr2zAUhcXoWNNs_2AMPe5hzmTLsey9ldClg4yWLKWP5kq6bhVsyZNkRv_rfkzlphtckB6-c450zwU5s84iIR9ztspZXn09rsDHR-9WBSvyFUvDmjdkka-LKuMFz8_IgomyyWpW8XNyEcKRMcZ5zd-Rc84rwZtqvSB_r7SJzhvo6cYNA9oI_ukbvXyxDsqNRtFtj9YZTfeonA3RTyoaZ-m9iY_01ySDgnHqwZtADwnUGNJtj2HqY6DG0lvvBhOMfaCb3lijUtTNFJUbMHyhcoop2Cr0dhY9gNczufXQxdnE-fElbA8RA71Fn8xjeh_duYTdwxM9uD9JRIH-dB5nokMV6Z1NqvfkbQd9wA-v55Lcfb86bK6z3c32x-Zylym-5jGTwEWtyqrRFXSFEDloyUHUBawBpO6krrHMVaMkCiwll4CsEUpphI4p6PiSfD75jt79njDENn1YYd-DRTeFtiibuhSiTGlLUp5QldYbPHbt6M2Qdt7mrJ17bY_tqdd27rVlaViTZJ9eEyY5oP4v-lckfwZO1qoz
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2021_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2022_03_001
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.eats.2015.04.005
10.1177/0363546515623929
10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.022
10.1177/0363546520960119
10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.037
10.1177/0363546520901538
10.1007/s12178-015-9258-y
10.1177/0363546518789348
10.1016/j.eats.2016.04.011
10.1177/0363546514544682
10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.012
10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.009
10.1177/2325967120964489
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Published by Elsevier Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: Published by Elsevier Inc.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1526-3231
EndPage 836
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_arthro_2021_01_009
33673965
Genre Comment
Editorial
Commentary
GroupedDBID --K
.1-
.FO
.GJ
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~5
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
AAEDT
AAEDW
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAXUO
ABLJU
ABMAC
ADBBV
ADMUD
ADPAM
AEVXI
AFCTW
AFJKZ
AFRHN
AFTJW
AHHHB
AITUG
AJUYK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BELOY
C5W
CAG
CGR
COF
CUY
CVF
EBS
ECM
EFJIC
EIF
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
G-2
GBLVA
HEE
HEK
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
M28
M31
M41
MO0
N9A
NPM
NQ-
O9-
OF~
OR-
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SEL
SES
SEW
SJN
SSZ
UHS
UV1
WUQ
XH2
YCJ
Z5R
ZXP
AAYXX
ACRPL
ADNMO
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-ba378c469d6af2771adb3a782a5aabdfbd8e41c9cbe7e4b3bae097ccdeaf0caf3
ISSN 0749-8063
IngestDate Wed Dec 04 01:52:30 EST 2024
Fri Dec 06 02:56:57 EST 2024
Sat Sep 28 08:19:16 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
License Published by Elsevier Inc.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c353t-ba378c469d6af2771adb3a782a5aabdfbd8e41c9cbe7e4b3bae097ccdeaf0caf3
Notes SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
OpenAccessLink http://www.arthroscopyjournal.org/article/S0749806321000232/pdf
PMID 33673965
PQID 2498477435
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 3
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2498477435
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2021_01_009
pubmed_primary_33673965
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-03-00
20210301
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-03-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Arthroscopy
PublicationTitleAlternate Arthroscopy
PublicationYear 2021
References 35501007 - Arthroscopy. 2022 May;38(5):1394-1395
33359157 - Arthroscopy. 2021 Mar;37(3):824-833
Yang (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib9) 2016; 44
Griesser (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib1) 2013; 22
Wong (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib10) 2018; 46
Frantz (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib8) 2020; 48
Boileau (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib11) 2019; 28
Boileau (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib13) 2019; 35
Wong (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib6) 2020; 48
Weick (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib12) 2020; 8
Dumont (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib4) 2014; 42
Gupta (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib2) 2015; 8
Fortun (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib5) 2016; 5
Wong (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib3) 2015; 4
Russo (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib7) 2021; 37
References_xml – volume: 4
  start-page: e449
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib3
  article-title: Arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction without subscapularis split
  publication-title: Arthrosc Tech
  doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2015.04.005
  contributor:
    fullname: Wong
– volume: 44
  start-page: 922
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib9
  article-title: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability with combined bone loss: Treatment and results with the modified Latarjet procedure
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/0363546515623929
  contributor:
    fullname: Yang
– volume: 28
  start-page: e377
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib11
  article-title: All-arthroscopic, guided Eden-Hybbinette procedure using suture-button fixation for revision of failed Latarjet
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.022
  contributor:
    fullname: Boileau
– volume: 48
  start-page: 3316
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib6
  article-title: Arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction using distal tibial allograft for recurrent anterior shoulder instability: Clinical and radiographic outcomes
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/0363546520960119
  contributor:
    fullname: Wong
– volume: 37
  start-page: 824
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib7
  article-title: Arthroscopic iliac crest bone allograft combined with subscapularis upper third tenodesis shows a low recurrence rate in the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability associated with critical bone loss
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.037
  contributor:
    fullname: Russo
– volume: 48
  start-page: 923
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib8
  article-title: Are patients who undergo the Latarjet procedure ready to return to play at 6 months? A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Group cohort study
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/0363546520901538
  contributor:
    fullname: Frantz
– volume: 8
  start-page: 59
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib2
  article-title: Complications of the Latarjet procedure
  publication-title: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med
  doi: 10.1007/s12178-015-9258-y
  contributor:
    fullname: Gupta
– volume: 46
  start-page: 2717
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib10
  article-title: Radiographic analysis of glenoid size and shape after arthroscopic coracoid autograft versus distal tibial allograft in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/0363546518789348
  contributor:
    fullname: Wong
– volume: 5
  start-page: e907
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib5
  article-title: Arthroscopic iliac crest bone grafting to the anterior glenoid
  publication-title: Arthrosc Tech
  doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.04.011
  contributor:
    fullname: Fortun
– volume: 42
  start-page: 2560
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib4
  article-title: The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: 5-year minimum follow-up
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/0363546514544682
  contributor:
    fullname: Dumont
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1050
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib13
  article-title: Arthroscopic Latarjet: Suture-button fixation is a safe and reliable alternative to screw fixation
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.012
  contributor:
    fullname: Boileau
– volume: 22
  start-page: 286
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib1
  article-title: Complications and re-operations after bristow-Latarjet shoulder stabilization: A systematic review
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.009
  contributor:
    fullname: Griesser
– volume: 8
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.009_bib12
  article-title: Osseous healing with nonrigid suture fixation in the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure
  publication-title: Orthop J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/2325967120964489
  contributor:
    fullname: Weick
SSID ssj0003383
Score 2.3930721
Snippet The pros and cons of open and arthroscopic shoulder stabilization procedures have been studied exhaustively. Yet, in many situations, the rates of recurrent...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 834
SubjectTerms Allografts
Arthroscopy
Humans
Ilium
Joint Instability - surgery
Rotator Cuff - surgery
Shoulder
Shoulder Dislocation - surgery
Shoulder Joint - surgery
Tenodesis
Title Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopic Glenoid Reconstruction With Subscapularis Tenodesis Results in Promising Clinical Outcomes, but Concerns Regarding Graft Resorption Rates Persist: A Long Way Toward a More Perfect Union
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673965
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2498477435
Volume 37
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1bb9MwFMet0kloLwjErdx0kHgrqdo4TWLeyjQ2oXHRtMHeIttxtk4smbL0hQ_Gp-HDcI5jpyljEiBVUZWkufT8cnJsn_M3Y6_EtJjnuQ4DEU7TgAS7AqVEGvDYGB0aE4qYaoc_fIz3j6P3J_OTweBHL2tp1aiJ_v7HupL_sSquQ7tSlew_WLY7KK7A72hfXKKFcflXNt7Nl6TxYdv_FzYLvLYCTouaZj-ggpOlHu_he6VaUhWirtZysegOmrPWbUiawguf9fER7pgbUig5NFerb41Nlf1cV4iCzQ7wRZSfVg3eTetf1KqhqkFt6pJ-dkrA2S4tWTR2bKBufdIhxbQ23x65asvhD2iao69UhmJTd8cSHUxtaB8rqIzRsEOmE8n1d9UNA-xUp6Vpml6xfG-Y68wYWa6TNt0W18MR9lK8JsZ55TAOeOheF85tt1oxDk_e88Gud_Tau6HtpjifSHu1EzqTVWy18gxND5fLC8sL53HCRTuTxW-a3H7TLbZFAozRkG3tvT34suhiAGr4-0JNm014_aTb7LY_zGZMdENDxwY8R3fZHddSgUWL3T02MOV99rNDDtbIvYE-cOCAg03ggICDDeCgAw4ccLAsoQMOPHDggXsNiBt43KDDDSxusMYNLG7gcMPrA4INEDZoYQMJBBs42MDC9oAdv9s92tkP3AQhgeZz3gRK8iTVUSzyWBZhksxkrrjEmFfOpVR5ofLURDMttDKJiRRX0kxFonVuZDHVsuAP2bCsSvOYgQxxt9mswPBWU5tCzsJYpioVQhc5BrUjFngTZZetDkzmEyTPs9a6GVk3m-JnKkbspbdjhn8ajcLJ0lSrqyyMBEaEGLjPR-xRa-DuiB6IJzduecq214_IMzZEI5rnGBY36oVj8BfhmsVA
link.rule.ids 314,780,784,27924,27925
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Editorial+Commentary%3A+Arthroscopic+Glenoid+Reconstruction+With+Subscapularis+Tenodesis+Results+in+Promising+Clinical+Outcomes%2C+but+Concerns+Regarding+Graft+Resorption+Rates+Persist%3A+A+Long+Way+Toward+a+More+Perfect+Union&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Cognetti%2C+Daniel+J&rft.au=Sheean%2C+Andrew+J&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.arthro.2021.01.009&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F33673965&rft.externalDocID=33673965
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0749-8063&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0749-8063&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0749-8063&client=summon