Development and performance evaluation of SCS-CN based hybrid model
In this study, a hybrid approach has been used to increase the predictive efficiency of the SCS-CN model. A recently proposed Ajmal model (developed after randomized configuration) that ignored initial abstraction and maximum potential retention has been given the conceptual framework of the SCS-CN...
Saved in:
Published in | Water science and technology Vol. 85; no. 9; pp. 2479 - 2502 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
IWA Publishing
01.05.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | In this study, a hybrid approach has been used to increase the predictive efficiency of the SCS-CN model. A recently proposed Ajmal model (developed after randomized configuration) that ignored initial abstraction and maximum potential retention has been given the conceptual framework of the SCS-CN model and a new outcome-based hybrid model (M
) was formulated. A total of 78 watersheds (7817 events) were used for calibration and the remaining 36 watersheds (3967 events) for validation to develop this hybrid model. The numerical value of hybrid model parameters L
, λ and S were calibrated using calibration dataset and a simple non-linear one-parameter model has been developed. The performance of the Ajmal (M
) and hybrid model (M
) was compared with the original SCS-CN method (λ = 0.2 as M
and λ = 0.05 as M
). The performance of models was compared by using four statistical error indices i.e. RMSE, NSE, PBIAS, and n(t) and applying ranking and grading system (RGS). The mean RMSE, NSE, PBIAS, and n(t) values were found superior for M
(5.60 mm, 0.71, 6.97%, 1.15) model followed by M
(5.98 mm, 0.65, 16.52%, 1.01), M
(6.27 mm, 0.61, 20%, 0.90) and M
(6.98 mm, 0.46, 24.2%, 0.72) model for tested watersheds. The hybrid model (M
) exhibited consistently well performance for all size watersheds. On the basis of the agreement between watershed runoff coefficient (C) and calibrated model parameter (L
or CN), R
value was found relatively higher for hybrid model (M
) than other models. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract In this study, a hybrid approach has been used to increase the predictive efficiency of the SCS-CN model. A recently proposed Ajmal model (developed after randomized configuration) that ignored initial abstraction and maximum potential retention has been given the conceptual framework of the SCS-CN model and a new outcome-based hybrid model (Miv) was formulated. A total of 78 watersheds (7817 events) were used for calibration and the remaining 36 watersheds (3967 events) for validation to develop this hybrid model. The numerical value of hybrid model parameters Lc, λ and S were calibrated using calibration dataset and a simple non-linear one-parameter model has been developed. The performance of the Ajmal (Miii) and hybrid model (Miv) was compared with the original SCS-CN method (λ = 0.2 as Mi and λ = 0.05 as Mii). The performance of models was compared by using four statistical error indices i.e. RMSE, NSE, PBIAS, and n(t) and applying ranking and grading system (RGS). The mean RMSE, NSE, PBIAS, and n(t) values were found superior for Miv (5.60 mm, 0.71, 6.97%, 1.15) model followed by Miii (5.98 mm, 0.65, 16.52%, 1.01), Mii (6.27 mm, 0.61, 20%, 0.90) and Mi (6.98 mm, 0.46, 24.2%, 0.72) model for tested watersheds. The hybrid model (Miv) exhibited consistently well performance for all size watersheds. On the basis of the agreement between watershed runoff coefficient (C) and calibrated model parameter (Lc or CN), R2 value was found relatively higher for hybrid model (Miv) than other models. In this study, a hybrid approach has been used to increase the predictive efficiency of the SCS-CN model. A recently proposed Ajmal model (developed after randomized configuration) that ignored initial abstraction and maximum potential retention has been given the conceptual framework of the SCS-CN model and a new outcome-based hybrid model (Miv) was formulated. A total of 78 watersheds (7817 events) were used for calibration and the remaining 36 watersheds (3967 events) for validation to develop this hybrid model. The numerical value of hybrid model parameters Lc, λ and S were calibrated using calibration dataset and a simple non-linear one-parameter model has been developed. The performance of the Ajmal (Miii) and hybrid model (Miv) was compared with the original SCS-CN method (λ = 0.2 as Mi and λ = 0.05 as Mii). The performance of models was compared by using four statistical error indices i.e. RMSE, NSE, PBIAS, and n(t) and applying ranking and grading system (RGS). The mean RMSE, NSE, PBIAS, and n(t) values were found superior for Miv (5.60 mm, 0.71, 6.97%, 1.15) model followed by Miii (5.98 mm, 0.65, 16.52%, 1.01), Mii (6.27 mm, 0.61, 20%, 0.90) and Mi (6.98 mm, 0.46, 24.2%, 0.72) model for tested watersheds. The hybrid model (Miv) exhibited consistently well performance for all size watersheds. On the basis of the agreement between watershed runoff coefficient (C) and calibrated model parameter (Lc or CN), R2 value was found relatively higher for hybrid model (Miv) than other models. HIGHLIGHTS The Ajmal model, which was tested on South Korean watersheds, has been investigated in a large set of US watersheds having different sizes.; The Ajmal model has been given the conceptual framework of SCS-CN model by merging both Ajmal and SCS-CN models and a hybrid model having three parameters (Lc, λ and S) has been evolved.; The three-parameter model was calibrated and a simplified version of the one-parameter hybrid model has been developed.; The performance of the hybrid model was found superior than other models.; In this study, a hybrid approach has been used to increase the predictive efficiency of the SCS-CN model. A recently proposed Ajmal model (developed after randomized configuration) that ignored initial abstraction and maximum potential retention has been given the conceptual framework of the SCS-CN model and a new outcome-based hybrid model (M ) was formulated. A total of 78 watersheds (7817 events) were used for calibration and the remaining 36 watersheds (3967 events) for validation to develop this hybrid model. The numerical value of hybrid model parameters L , λ and S were calibrated using calibration dataset and a simple non-linear one-parameter model has been developed. The performance of the Ajmal (M ) and hybrid model (M ) was compared with the original SCS-CN method (λ = 0.2 as M and λ = 0.05 as M ). The performance of models was compared by using four statistical error indices i.e. RMSE, NSE, PBIAS, and n(t) and applying ranking and grading system (RGS). The mean RMSE, NSE, PBIAS, and n(t) values were found superior for M (5.60 mm, 0.71, 6.97%, 1.15) model followed by M (5.98 mm, 0.65, 16.52%, 1.01), M (6.27 mm, 0.61, 20%, 0.90) and M (6.98 mm, 0.46, 24.2%, 0.72) model for tested watersheds. The hybrid model (M ) exhibited consistently well performance for all size watersheds. On the basis of the agreement between watershed runoff coefficient (C) and calibrated model parameter (L or CN), R value was found relatively higher for hybrid model (M ) than other models. In this study, a hybrid approach has been used to increase the predictive efficiency of the SCS-CN model. A recently proposed Ajmal model (developed after randomized configuration) that ignored initial abstraction and maximum potential retention has been given the conceptual framework of the SCS-CN model and a new outcome-based hybrid model (Miv) was formulated. A total of 78 watersheds (7817 events) were used for calibration and the remaining 36 watersheds (3967 events) for validation to develop this hybrid model. The numerical value of hybrid model parameters Lc, λ and S were calibrated using calibration dataset and a simple non-linear one-parameter model has been developed. The performance of the Ajmal (Miii) and hybrid model (Miv) was compared with the original SCS-CN method (λ = 0.2 as Mi and λ = 0.05 as Mii). The performance of models was compared by using four statistical error indices i.e. RMSE, NSE, PBIAS, and n(t) and applying ranking and grading system (RGS). The mean RMSE, NSE, PBIAS, and n(t) values were found superior for Miv (5.60 mm, 0.71, 6.97%, 1.15) model followed by Miii (5.98 mm, 0.65, 16.52%, 1.01), Mii (6.27 mm, 0.61, 20%, 0.90) and Mi (6.98 mm, 0.46, 24.2%, 0.72) model for tested watersheds. The hybrid model (Miv) exhibited consistently well performance for all size watersheds. On the basis of the agreement between watershed runoff coefficient (C) and calibrated model parameter (Lc or CN), R2 value was found relatively higher for hybrid model (Miv) than other models. |
Author | Upreti, Pankaj Ojha, C S P |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Pankaj surname: Upreti fullname: Upreti, Pankaj email: pankaj_upretiiac@yahoo.com, pankaj.upreticot@gmail.com organization: Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, India E-mail: pankaj_upretiiac@yahoo.com, pankaj.upreticot@gmail.com; Department of Agricultural Engineering, GMV Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur 247451, India – sequence: 2 givenname: C S P surname: Ojha fullname: Ojha, C S P email: pankaj_upretiiac@yahoo.com, pankaj.upreticot@gmail.com organization: Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, India E-mail: pankaj_upretiiac@yahoo.com, pankaj.upreticot@gmail.com |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35576249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdkU1v1DAQQC1URLeFG2cUiQsHstjjr_URpVAqVXAonC1_jCGrJF7spKj_npRte-DkkfX0NKN3Rk6mPCEhrxndAlPqw586b4ECbJmQz8iGGaNaozmckA0FzVsGwE_JWa17Sqnmgr4gp1xKrUCYDeku8BaHfBhxmhs3xeaAJeUyuilgg7duWNzc56nJqbnpbtrua-Ndxdj8uvOlj82YIw4vyfPkhoqvHt5z8uPzp-_dl_b62-VV9_G6DVzyudVeqd2OKgksaFApMS-M0Zprv-MAfsdUUFKkKH3k6JKXXAiqKDJYB6n4Obk6emN2e3so_ejKnc2ut_8-cvlpXZn7MKCNitOgDEAUSWigJhlmggQlgHuHYXW9O7oOJf9esM527GvAYXAT5qVaUEoyaoCKFX37H7rPS5nWSy3sDNOCaqFX6v2RCiXXWjA9LciovQ9l11D2PpRdQ634mwfp4keMT_BjGf4XX26MJw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2022_129049 crossref_primary_10_3390_civileng4030052 crossref_primary_10_2166_wst_2023_126 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s11269-015-0924-z 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004 10.13031/2013.23153 10.1080/02626667.2012.701305 10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00127-4 10.1002/hyp.7116 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000452 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.006 10.5194/hess-22-4725-2018 10.2175/106143017X15131012188213 10.1016/j.catena.2015.06.001 10.1002/hyp.10315 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1985)111:4(330) 10.1002/hyp.6503 10.1002/hyp.7011 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:1(28) 10.1007/s11269-007-9196-6 10.3390/ijerph15040775 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115767 10.2166/wcc.2010.022 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000997 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000281 10.1002/hyp.7638 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000805 10.1016/j.catena.2018.06.006 10.2166/ws.2020.315 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:1(11) 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:6(597) 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000570 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright IWA Publishing May 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright IWA Publishing May 2022 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7QH 7UA 7X7 7XB 88E 8FE 8FG 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AFKRA BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO F1W FYUFA GHDGH H96 H97 HCIFZ K9. L.G L6V M0S M1P M7S PCBAR PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PTHSS 7X8 DOA |
DOI | 10.2166/wst.2022.145 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Aqualine Water Resources Abstracts ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest Engineering Collection Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) ProQuest Engineering Database ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Collection MEDLINE - Academic DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Technology Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest Engineering Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Engineering Collection Engineering Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest SciTech Collection Aqualine ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering Environmental Sciences |
EISSN | 1996-9732 |
EndPage | 2502 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_d630c6922d4f47209f919c526423baec 10_2166_wst_2022_145 35576249 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K -~X 0R~ 123 1B1 29R 3V. 4.4 53G 7X7 88E 8CJ 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAEDT AALRI AAQXK AAXUO ABFYC ABJCF ABUWG ABYZJ ACGFO ACIWK ADMUD AECGI AENEX AFKRA AFRAH AGVJA AITUG AJXRC ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CGR CS3 CUY CVF D1J DU5 EBS ECM EIF EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FYUFA GEUZO GROUPED_DOAJ H13 HCIFZ HFPTO HMCUK HVGLF HZ~ IHE L6V L7B M1P M41 M7S NPM NQ- O9- OK1 P2P PCBAR PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS R0Z R2- RHI RHY RIG ROL RPZ SJN TN5 UAO UHS UKHRP Y6R ~02 ~KM AAYXX CITATION 7QH 7UA 7XB 8FK C1K DWQXO F1W H96 H97 K9. L.G PQEST PQUKI 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-7b668806521c726ff1b4997737b8322b816c654fd5bd3eafb5344060e12344563 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 0273-1223 |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 15:06:47 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 03:44:43 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 07 07:20:22 EST 2024 Wed Sep 25 14:03:26 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 16 00:41:27 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c353t-7b668806521c726ff1b4997737b8322b816c654fd5bd3eafb5344060e12344563 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/d630c6922d4f47209f919c526423baec |
PMID | 35576249 |
PQID | 2891740747 |
PQPubID | 2044520 |
PageCount | 24 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d630c6922d4f47209f919c526423baec proquest_miscellaneous_2665109204 proquest_journals_2891740747 crossref_primary_10_2166_wst_2022_145 pubmed_primary_35576249 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-May 2022-05-01 20220501 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2022 text: 2022-May |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Water science and technology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Water Sci Technol |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | IWA Publishing |
Publisher_xml | – name: IWA Publishing |
References | (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C14) 2008; 22 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C30) 2015; 29 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C2) 2015; 29 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C35) 2003 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C3) 2014; 1 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C25) 2013; 480 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C19) 2006; 11 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C34) 2012; 57 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C16) 2015; 133 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C27) 2018; 22 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C29) 2010; 1 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C15) 2010; 24 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C32) 2021; 21 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C1) 2015; 141 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C11) 1985; 111 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C26) 2007; 21 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C20) 2005; 41 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C23) 1996; 1 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C31) 2012; 17 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C22) 2007; 50 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C7) 2010; 15 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C21) 2008; 22 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C13) 2009 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C24) 2018; 90 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C28) 1999; 224 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C9) 2014; 19 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C4) 1997; 123 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C33) 2017; 76 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C18) 2020; 177 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C5) 2018; 170 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C6) 2014; 137 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C8) 2012; 17 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C17) 2018; 15 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C10) 2008; 22 (2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C12) 2001 |
References_xml | – volume: 29 start-page: 1995 year: 2015 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C2 article-title: Improved runoff estimation using event-based rainfall-runoff models publication-title: Water Resources Management doi: 10.1007/s11269-015-0924-z – volume: 480 start-page: 33 year: 2013 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C25 article-title: Performance evaluation of hydrological models: statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments publication-title: Journal of Hydrology doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004 – volume: 50 start-page: 885 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C22 article-title: Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations publication-title: Transactions of the ASABE doi: 10.13031/2013.23153 – volume: 57 start-page: 1118 issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C34 article-title: Development of a robust runoff-prediction model by fusing the rational equation and a modified SCS-CN method publication-title: Hydrological Science Journal doi: 10.1080/02626667.2012.701305 – start-page: 1 year: 2003 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C35 article-title: Runoff curve number method: Examination of the initial abstraction ratio – volume: 224 start-page: 149 year: 1999 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C28 article-title: Modification of the probability-distributed interacting storage capacity model publication-title: Journal of Hydrology doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00127-4 – volume: 22 start-page: 4936 year: 2008 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C14 article-title: Temporally weighted average curve number method for daily runoff simulation publication-title: Hydrological Processes doi: 10.1002/hyp.7116 – volume: 17 start-page: 1180 year: 2012 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C31 article-title: Curve number determination methods and uncertainty in hydrologic soil groups from semiarid watershed data publication-title: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000452 – volume: 137 start-page: 146 year: 2014 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C6 article-title: Improving risk estimates of runoff producing areas: formulating variable source areas as a bivariate process publication-title: Journal of Environmental Management doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.006 – volume: 22 start-page: 4725 year: 2018 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C27 article-title: Including effects of watershed heterogeneity in the curve number method using variable initial abstraction publication-title: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences doi: 10.5194/hess-22-4725-2018 – volume: 90 start-page: 2075 issue: 12 year: 2018 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C24 article-title: Urban flood estimation and evaluation of the performance of an urban drainage system in a semi-arid urban area using SWMM publication-title: Water Environment Research doi: 10.2175/106143017X15131012188213 – volume: 133 start-page: 318 year: 2015 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C16 article-title: Physical verification of the effect of land features and antecedent moisture on runoff curve number publication-title: Catena doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.06.001 – volume: 29 start-page: 1999 issue: 8 year: 2015 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C30 article-title: Use of a parsimonious rainfall-run-off model for predicting hydrological response in ungauged basins publication-title: Hydrological Processes doi: 10.1002/hyp.10315 – volume: 111 start-page: 330 year: 1985 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C11 article-title: Runoff probability, storm depth, and curve numbers publication-title: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1985)111:4(330) – year: 2009 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C13 article-title: Curve number hydrology: state of the practice publication-title: American Society of Civil Engineers – volume: 21 start-page: 2872 year: 2007 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C26 article-title: An advanced soil moisture accounting procedure for SCS curve number method publication-title: Hydrological Processes doi: 10.1002/hyp.6503 – volume: 22 start-page: 4097 year: 2008 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C10 article-title: Runoff curve numbers for steep hillslopes with natural vegetation in semi-arid tropical highlands, northern Ethiopia publication-title: Hydrological Processes doi: 10.1002/hyp.7011 – volume: 123 start-page: 28 year: 1997 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C4 article-title: Determination of watershed curve number using derived distributions publication-title: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:1(28) – volume: 41 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C20 article-title: Soil conservation service curve number method: how to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure? publication-title: Water Resources Research – volume: 22 start-page: 861 year: 2008 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C21 article-title: A rain duration and modified AMC-dependent SCS-CN procedure for long duration rainfall-runoff events publication-title: Water Resources Management doi: 10.1007/s11269-007-9196-6 – volume: 1 start-page: 74 year: 2014 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C3 article-title: A simple, regionally parameterized model for predicting nonpoint source areas in the northeastern US publication-title: Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies – year: 2001 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C12 article-title: Investigation of the runoff curve number abstraction ratio – volume: 15 start-page: 775 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C17 article-title: Assessing the impact of urbanization on direct runoff using improved composite CN method in a large urban area publication-title: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040775 – volume: 177 start-page: 115767 year: 2020 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C18 article-title: CN-China: Revised runoff curve number by using rainfall-runoff events data in China publication-title: Water Research doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115767 – volume: 1 start-page: 118 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C29 article-title: An updated hydrological review on recent advancements in soil conservation service-curve number technique publication-title: Journal of Water and Climate Change doi: 10.2166/wcc.2010.022 – volume: 19 start-page: 04014035 year: 2014 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C9 article-title: Curve number: empirical evaluation and comparison with curve number handbook tables in Sicily publication-title: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000997 – volume: 76 start-page: 1 issue: 21 year: 2017 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C33 article-title: An enhanced SMA based SCS-CN inspired model for watershed runoff prediction publication-title: Environmental Earth Sciences – volume: 15 start-page: 1045 year: 2010 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C7 article-title: Theory-based SCS-CN method and its applications publication-title: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000281 – volume: 24 start-page: 2156 year: 2010 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C15 article-title: SWAT application to estimate design runoff curve number for South Korean conditions publication-title: Hydrological Processes doi: 10.1002/hyp.7638 – volume: 141 start-page: 04014058 year: 2015 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C1 article-title: Quantifying excess stormwater using SCS-CN–based rainfall runoff models and different curve number determination methods publication-title: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000805 – volume: 170 start-page: 141 year: 2018 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C5 article-title: Effects of vegetation and rainfall types on surface runoff and soil erosion on steep slopes on the Loess Plateau, China publication-title: Catena doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.06.006 – volume: 21 start-page: 2122 issue: 5 year: 2021 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C32 article-title: Comparison of antecedent precipitation based rainfall-runoff models publication-title: Water Supply doi: 10.2166/ws.2020.315 – volume: 1 start-page: 11 year: 1996 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C23 article-title: Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? publication-title: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:1(11) – volume: 11 start-page: 597 year: 2006 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C19 article-title: Evaluation of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency index publication-title: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:6(597) – volume: 17 start-page: 1141 year: 2012 ident: 2022062708535273000_WST-D-22-00042C8 article-title: Empirical investigation of curve number method parameters in the Mediterranean area publication-title: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000570 |
SSID | ssj0007340 |
Score | 2.4349897 |
Snippet | In this study, a hybrid approach has been used to increase the predictive efficiency of the SCS-CN model. A recently proposed Ajmal model (developed after... Abstract In this study, a hybrid approach has been used to increase the predictive efficiency of the SCS-CN model. A recently proposed Ajmal model (developed... |
SourceID | doaj proquest crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 2479 |
SubjectTerms | Calibration curve number Datasets event-based rainfall-runoff model hybrid model Hydrology Mathematical models optimization Parameter identification Parameters Performance evaluation Rain Retention Root-mean-square errors Runoff Runoff coefficient scs-cn method Statistical analysis Storms us watersheds Variables Water conservation Watersheds |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1NT9tAEB2VcCmHqkABtxQtEj1a2PvpPVUlShQhEVWkkbhZ3g_DyQ4kqOLfM2tvEji0V3tl2bOeee_tzs4AXGS0KirjZVp4nqFAsTytaoaqlXptvXLUd3W6b6ZyMufXd-IuLrgtY1rlOiZ2gdq1NqyRX6IwQPIcyr3_XDymoWtU2F2NLTR2YJeiUsgGsHs1mv6-3cRixXi_yqJYmiMS9qnvNJfy8u8ypFJSirFCvAOlrnb_vwlnBzzjz_ApMkbyq5_iffjgmwPYe1NH8ACORtvjajg0-uvyEIZvcoJI1Tiy2J4TINtC36StyWw4S4dTElDNkYeXcJCLdG1yvsB8PPoznKSxbUJqmWCrVBkpi7BfSnOrqKzr3KCsUYopE9zXFLm0UvDaCeOYr2ojGEdYzzyCGEc-xY5g0LSNPwGC4C-VFwXjGs1LlXbMaY6szStjCi0T-LG2W7noq2OUqCqCfUu0bxnsi-JCJHAVjLoZE2padxfap_syukjpJMus1JQ6XnNFM13rXFuBjI0yU3mbwOl6SsroaMty-1skcL65jS4S9j2qxrfPOEZKjDyaZjyB434qN2-CdAvhgOuv_3_4N_gYvqXPdDyFwerp2X9HNrIyZ_GXewX0j9pW priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Development and performance evaluation of SCS-CN based hybrid model |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35576249 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2891740747 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2665109204 https://doaj.org/article/d630c6922d4f47209f919c526423baec |
Volume | 85 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwED7xWGBAUCgESmUkGKMmfsYjVC0IiQrxkLpFceyIKa1oEeLfc07SBwNiYcmQeHDucvfdF58_A1xGNEsy42SYOB4hQcl5mBUMWSt1OnfKUlfpdD-M5N0rvx-L8dpRX74nrJYHrg3Xs5JFudSUWl5wRSNd6FjnAnGcMpO5vMq-kV6QqSYHK8brvyuKhTEiYN3yTmMpe58z30JJKeYI8QOMKs3-3wvNCnCG-7DXVIrkup7hAWy4sgW7a_qBLWgPVtvUcGgTp7ND6K_1ApGstGS62h9AVgLfZFKQ5_5z2B8Rj2aWvH35DVykOh7nCF6Hg5f-XdgclxDmTLB5qIyUiV8npXGuqCyK2CCdUYop48PWJLHMpeCFFcYylxVGMI5wHjkEL451FGvDVjkp3QkQBH2pnEgY10jAqNKWWc2xWnPKmETLAK4WdkuntSpGimzC2zdF-6bevkgqRAA33qjLMV7LurqBHk4bD6d_eTiAzsIlaRNgsxR5InIpr_4fwMXyMYaGX-_ISjf5wDFSYsbRNOIBHNeuXM4EyyyEAa5P_2OGZ7Dj37jug-zA1vz9w51jrTI3XdhUY4XXZHjbhe2bwejxqVt9qt8hoeQz |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,867,2109,12068,12777,21400,27936,27937,31731,31732,33385,33386,33756,33757,43322,43612,43817,74073,74363,74630 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT9wwEB7xOEAPiGcbSouR4BiR-BmfqnbFdnntBZC4WfEj9JRs2UVV_33HSXYXDvSaWFYy9sz3jT0PgNOMlkVpg0yLwDN0UBxPy4qh10qDdkF5Gto63bdjOXrgV4_isT9wm_ZhlXOb2Bpq37h4Rn6OjgGS51ju_dvkdxq7RsXb1b6Fxiqsc4ZYHTPFhz8Xllgx3p2xKJbmiINd4DvNpTz_M42BlJSipRBvIKmt3P8-3WxhZ7gNWz1fJN-7Bd6BlVDvwodXVQR34eBimayGQ3ttne7B4FVEEClrTybLLAGyLPNNmorcDe7SwZhETPPk19-YxkXaJjn78DC8uB-M0r5pQuqYYLNUWSmLeFtKc6eorKrcolOjFFM2Kq8tcumk4JUX1rNQVlYwjqCeBYQwjmyKHcBa3dThExCEfqmCKBjX6IZRpT3zmiNnC8raQssEzuZyM5OuNoZBnyLK16B8TZQvuhYigR9RqIsxsaJ1-6B5fjK9ghgvWeakptTziiua6Urn2gnka5TZMrgEjuZLYno1m5rlpkjgZPEaFSTeepR1aF5wjJRodzTNeAIfu6VcfAmSLQQDrg__P_kxbIzub2_MzeX4-jNsxv_qYh6PYG32_BK-IC-Z2a_t5vsHofPb4Q |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwEB7BVkJwqKDQkraAkeAYbeJnfKrosqvyWlWUSr1F8QtOydLdCvXfd5x4d8sBrollJTOeme-zxzMA7wraVI3xMq88L5CgWJ43gSFrpV5brxz1fZ3ub3N5dsk_X4mrlP-0TGmVa5_YO2rX2bhHPkZigOA5lnsfh5QWcf5xdrL4nccOUvGkNbXTeAg7iktWjGDndDo__77xy4rxYcdFsbzEqDikwdNSyvGfZUyrpBT9hvgrQPV1_P8NPvsgNHsKuwk9kg-Dup_BA9_uwZN7NQX3YH-6vbqGQ5PtLp_D5F5-EGlaRxbbOwNkW_SbdIFcTC7yyZzECOfIr9t4qYv0LXNewOVs-mNylqcWCrllgq1yZaSs4tkpLa2iMoTSIMVRiikTTdlUpbRS8OCEccw3wQjGMcQXHgMaR2zF9mHUdq1_CQSBgFReVIxrJGVUacec5ojgvDKm0jKD92u51YuhUkaNDCPKt0b51lG-SDREBqdRqJsxsb51_6C7_lknc6kdKtBKTanjgSta6KBLbQWiN8pM420Gx2uV1MnolvV2iWTwdvMazSWegTSt725wjJTohTQteAYHgyo3X4LQC0MD14f_n_wNPMKVV3_9NP9yBI_jbw0JkMcwWl3f-FcIUlbmdVp9d_Do4X4 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development+and+performance+evaluation+of+SCS-CN+based+hybrid+model&rft.jtitle=Water+science+and+technology&rft.au=Upreti%2C+Pankaj&rft.au=Ojha%2C+C.+S.+P.&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2479&rft.epage=2502&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166%2Fwst.2022.145&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_2166_wst_2022_145 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0273-1223&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0273-1223&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0273-1223&client=summon |