Multispecies biofilm removal by XP‐endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation: A scanning electron microscopy study

The aim was to assess the effect of XP‐endo Finisher (XPF) on multispecies biofilm removal, in comparison with passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Fifty mandibular first premolars were instrumented, longitudinally sect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAustralian endodontic journal Vol. 48; no. 1; pp. 91 - 97
Main Authors Teves, Abel, Blanco, Daniel, Casaretto, Mario, Torres, John, Alvarado, Débora E., Coaguila‐Llerena, Hernán, Faria, Gisele, Jaramillo, David E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim was to assess the effect of XP‐endo Finisher (XPF) on multispecies biofilm removal, in comparison with passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Fifty mandibular first premolars were instrumented, longitudinally sectioned. The split halves were incubated for 4 days with a broth obtained from three bacteria strains: Enterococcus faecalis, Eikenella corrodens and Streptococcus anginosus. Subsequently, the re‐approximated split halves were irrigated with 4% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) or water using CSI, and the final irrigation protocols were CSI with 4% NaOCl (CSI+4%NaOCl), PUI+4%NaOCl, XPF+4%NaOCl and CSI+water. The analysis of biofilm removal was performed using SEM images. There were no differences between PUI and XPF (P > 0.05), and both groups promoted higher biofilm removal than CSI+4%NaOCl and CSI+water groups (P < 0.05). It can be concluded the multispecies biofilm removal was significantly improved using XPF and PUI when compared to CSI.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1329-1947
1747-4477
DOI:10.1111/aej.12549