Oral amoxicillin challenge for low‐risk penicillin allergic patients

Background Penicillin allergy is the most reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Being labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ is associated with suboptimal antibiotic therapy and poor patient outcomes. Most labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ are at low risk of harm from penicillins and guidelines recomme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternal medicine journal Vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 295 - 300
Main Authors Livirya, Silabhakta, Pithie, Alan, Chua, Ignatius, Hamilton, Niall, Doogue, Matthew, Isenman, Heather
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01.02.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Penicillin allergy is the most reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Being labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ is associated with suboptimal antibiotic therapy and poor patient outcomes. Most labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ are at low risk of harm from penicillins and guidelines recommend testing for accurate diagnosis. Although skin testing is recommended to exclude immunoglobulin E (IgE)‐mediated reactions, there is limited access in most settings. Aims To evaluate oral amoxicillin challenge without prior skin testing for patients labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ assessed as low risk during hospital admission. Methods General Medical inpatients with a ‘penicillin allergy’ label were assessed. For those who had tolerated a penicillin since the index event, the ADR label was removed. Those assessed as ‘low risk’ were administered 250 mg amoxicillin orally without prior skin testing. The durability of de‐labelling was subsequently assessed by review of clinical records. Results Of 224 patients with a history of a penicillin ADR, 162 (72%) were low risk. A further 12 were excluded and of the remaining 150, 56 (37%) had tolerated penicillins since their index reaction and were de‐labelled without challenge, 15 (10%) with a non‐allergic history were de‐labelled. The remaining 79 were offered an oral amoxicillin challenge; 38 declined and 41 tolerated amoxicillin. Overall, 112 of the 224 (50%) patients had their ADR label removed. Conclusions A careful ADR history enables de‐labelling of many patients. An oral amoxicillin challenge without prior skin testing is safe and feasible for low‐risk penicillin allergic patients while in hospital.
AbstractList BackgroundPenicillin allergy is the most reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Being labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ is associated with suboptimal antibiotic therapy and poor patient outcomes. Most labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ are at low risk of harm from penicillins and guidelines recommend testing for accurate diagnosis. Although skin testing is recommended to exclude immunoglobulin E (IgE)‐mediated reactions, there is limited access in most settings.AimsTo evaluate oral amoxicillin challenge without prior skin testing for patients labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ assessed as low risk during hospital admission.MethodsGeneral Medical inpatients with a ‘penicillin allergy’ label were assessed. For those who had tolerated a penicillin since the index event, the ADR label was removed. Those assessed as ‘low risk’ were administered 250 mg amoxicillin orally without prior skin testing. The durability of de‐labelling was subsequently assessed by review of clinical records.ResultsOf 224 patients with a history of a penicillin ADR, 162 (72%) were low risk. A further 12 were excluded and of the remaining 150, 56 (37%) had tolerated penicillins since their index reaction and were de‐labelled without challenge, 15 (10%) with a non‐allergic history were de‐labelled. The remaining 79 were offered an oral amoxicillin challenge; 38 declined and 41 tolerated amoxicillin. Overall, 112 of the 224 (50%) patients had their ADR label removed.ConclusionsA careful ADR history enables de‐labelling of many patients. An oral amoxicillin challenge without prior skin testing is safe and feasible for low‐risk penicillin allergic patients while in hospital.
Penicillin allergy is the most reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Being labelled with 'penicillin allergy' is associated with suboptimal antibiotic therapy and poor patient outcomes. Most labelled with 'penicillin allergy' are at low risk of harm from penicillins and guidelines recommend testing for accurate diagnosis. Although skin testing is recommended to exclude immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated reactions, there is limited access in most settings. To evaluate oral amoxicillin challenge without prior skin testing for patients labelled with 'penicillin allergy' assessed as low risk during hospital admission. General Medical inpatients with a 'penicillin allergy' label were assessed. For those who had tolerated a penicillin since the index event, the ADR label was removed. Those assessed as 'low risk' were administered 250 mg amoxicillin orally without prior skin testing. The durability of de-labelling was subsequently assessed by review of clinical records. Of 224 patients with a history of a penicillin ADR, 162 (72%) were low risk. A further 12 were excluded and of the remaining 150, 56 (37%) had tolerated penicillins since their index reaction and were de-labelled without challenge, 15 (10%) with a non-allergic history were de-labelled. The remaining 79 were offered an oral amoxicillin challenge; 38 declined and 41 tolerated amoxicillin. Overall, 112 of the 224 (50%) patients had their ADR label removed. A careful ADR history enables de-labelling of many patients. An oral amoxicillin challenge without prior skin testing is safe and feasible for low-risk penicillin allergic patients while in hospital.
Abstract Background Penicillin allergy is the most reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Being labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ is associated with suboptimal antibiotic therapy and poor patient outcomes. Most labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ are at low risk of harm from penicillins and guidelines recommend testing for accurate diagnosis. Although skin testing is recommended to exclude immunoglobulin E (IgE)‐mediated reactions, there is limited access in most settings. Aims To evaluate oral amoxicillin challenge without prior skin testing for patients labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ assessed as low risk during hospital admission. Methods General Medical inpatients with a ‘penicillin allergy’ label were assessed. For those who had tolerated a penicillin since the index event, the ADR label was removed. Those assessed as ‘low risk’ were administered 250 mg amoxicillin orally without prior skin testing. The durability of de‐labelling was subsequently assessed by review of clinical records. Results Of 224 patients with a history of a penicillin ADR, 162 (72%) were low risk. A further 12 were excluded and of the remaining 150, 56 (37%) had tolerated penicillins since their index reaction and were de‐labelled without challenge, 15 (10%) with a non‐allergic history were de‐labelled. The remaining 79 were offered an oral amoxicillin challenge; 38 declined and 41 tolerated amoxicillin. Overall, 112 of the 224 (50%) patients had their ADR label removed. Conclusions A careful ADR history enables de‐labelling of many patients. An oral amoxicillin challenge without prior skin testing is safe and feasible for low‐risk penicillin allergic patients while in hospital.
Background Penicillin allergy is the most reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Being labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ is associated with suboptimal antibiotic therapy and poor patient outcomes. Most labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ are at low risk of harm from penicillins and guidelines recommend testing for accurate diagnosis. Although skin testing is recommended to exclude immunoglobulin E (IgE)‐mediated reactions, there is limited access in most settings. Aims To evaluate oral amoxicillin challenge without prior skin testing for patients labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ assessed as low risk during hospital admission. Methods General Medical inpatients with a ‘penicillin allergy’ label were assessed. For those who had tolerated a penicillin since the index event, the ADR label was removed. Those assessed as ‘low risk’ were administered 250 mg amoxicillin orally without prior skin testing. The durability of de‐labelling was subsequently assessed by review of clinical records. Results Of 224 patients with a history of a penicillin ADR, 162 (72%) were low risk. A further 12 were excluded and of the remaining 150, 56 (37%) had tolerated penicillins since their index reaction and were de‐labelled without challenge, 15 (10%) with a non‐allergic history were de‐labelled. The remaining 79 were offered an oral amoxicillin challenge; 38 declined and 41 tolerated amoxicillin. Overall, 112 of the 224 (50%) patients had their ADR label removed. Conclusions A careful ADR history enables de‐labelling of many patients. An oral amoxicillin challenge without prior skin testing is safe and feasible for low‐risk penicillin allergic patients while in hospital.
Author Pithie, Alan
Livirya, Silabhakta
Hamilton, Niall
Isenman, Heather
Chua, Ignatius
Doogue, Matthew
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Silabhakta
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2820-4721
  surname: Livirya
  fullname: Livirya, Silabhakta
  email: sila_livirya@hotmail.com
  organization: Hawke's Bay Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Alan
  surname: Pithie
  fullname: Pithie, Alan
  organization: Christchurch Hospital
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ignatius
  surname: Chua
  fullname: Chua, Ignatius
  organization: Christchurch Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Niall
  surname: Hamilton
  fullname: Hamilton, Niall
  organization: Auckland City Hospital
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Matthew
  surname: Doogue
  fullname: Doogue, Matthew
  organization: University of Otago
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Heather
  surname: Isenman
  fullname: Isenman, Heather
  organization: Christchurch Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32672891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp10L1OwzAUBWALFdEfGHgBFIkFhrS249jxiCoKRUVdYLYcxykuTlLsRqUbj8Az8iSkTWFAwsv18Ono3tMHnbIqNQDnCA5R80amWA4R4Sw5Aj1ESBzGnJPO_k9CyGHUBX3vlxAiFnFyAroRpgwnHPXAZO6kDWRRvRtlrDVloF6ktbpc6CCvXGCrzdfHpzP-NVjp8sfshFsYFazk2uhy7U_BcS6t12eHOQDPk9un8X04m99NxzezUEVxlISYZzKjRCmVYMZUnvIsJ5SkMUE8S0nMJMZUZxBBRHKo0xRRoqOcYZYrRTMSDcBVm7ty1Vut_VoUxittrSx1VXuBCW5ujhGLG3r5hy6r2pXNdgLTCFKW0Bg36rpVylXeO52LlTOFdFuBoNiVK5pyxb7cxl4cEuu00Nmv_GmzAaMWbIzV2_-TxPTxoY38Bh0HhdQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijid_2022_11_026
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12879_021_06794_1
crossref_primary_10_1080_14787210_2023_2296068
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2023_03_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaip_2023_06_025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaip_2024_04_042
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaip_2024_04_010
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2022_923991
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaip_2023_04_006
crossref_primary_10_2500_aap_2023_44_230013
crossref_primary_10_3389_falgy_2023_1161683
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14073
crossref_primary_10_1093_jacamr_dlad134
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.01.023
10.1111/cea.12468
10.1093/ofid/ofw155
10.1001/archinte.160.18.2819
10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0403
10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70439-2
10.1016/j.jaip.2013.02.002
10.1016/j.jaip.2016.09.045
10.1016/j.anai.2016.04.021
10.1016/j.jaip.2013.01.006
10.1016/j.jaip.2013.11.006
10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6480
10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.012
10.1592/phco.31.8.742
10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.021
10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01638.x
10.1093/jac/dky575
10.1016/j.jaip.2014.11.002
10.1111/1742-6723.12774
10.2500/aap.2019.40.4184
10.1111/all.12195
10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.026
10.1093/cid/ciw118
10.1016/j.jaip.2017.03.014
10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202438
10.1111/all.12142
10.1592/phco.28.11.1348
10.1016/j.anai.2010.08.002
10.1016/j.jaip.2016.03.009
10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01924.x
10.1016/j.jaci.2003.11.032
10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.011
10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_230.x
10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.023
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 Royal Australasian College of Physicians
2020 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
2022 Royal Australasian College of Physicians
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 Royal Australasian College of Physicians
– notice: 2020 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
– notice: 2022 Royal Australasian College of Physicians
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7T5
7U9
H94
7X8
DOI 10.1111/imj.14978
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
Immunology Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Immunology Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
CrossRef

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1445-5994
EndPage 300
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_imj_14978
32672891
IMJ14978
Genre article
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Canterbury Medical Research Foundation
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
29J
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
J5H
K48
KBYEO
KTM
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOQ
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
ZGI
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7T5
7U9
H94
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-29dad64ccc8277cfb9df464b5419db457a226ed01014f0ebb164e3f727fcc6d43
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1444-0903
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 22:34:17 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 22:03:13 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 03:45:33 EDT 2024
Tue Aug 27 13:49:17 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 00:57:18 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords antibiotic
penicillin
allergy
drug challenge
adverse drug reaction
Language English
License 2020 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3538-29dad64ccc8277cfb9df464b5419db457a226ed01014f0ebb164e3f727fcc6d43
Notes Conflict of interest: None.
Funding: This study was funded and supported by the Canterbury Medical Research Foundation and Canterbury District Health Board.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-2820-4721
PMID 32672891
PQID 2630678652
PQPubID 2045147
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2424445175
proquest_journals_2630678652
crossref_primary_10_1111_imj_14978
pubmed_primary_32672891
wiley_primary_10_1111_imj_14978_IMJ14978
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate February 2022
2022-Feb
2022-02-00
20220201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2022
  text: February 2022
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Melbourne
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Melbourne
– name: Australia
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Internal medicine journal
PublicationTitleAlternate Intern Med J
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2017; 5
2013; 1
2009; 64
2015; 3
2019; 74
2010; 105
2006; 98
2013; 68
2020; 180
2011; 31
2017; 29
1999; 103
2014; 133
2014; 67
2003; 33
2016; 5
2015; 45
2018; 17
2019; 40
2014; 2
2016; 3
2004; 113
2015; 115
2008; 28
2000; 160
2019
2016; 177
2016; 62
2013; 173
2016; 137
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_26_1
e_1_2_7_27_1
e_1_2_7_28_1
e_1_2_7_29_1
Trubiano JA (e_1_2_7_35_1) 2018; 17
Therapeutic Guidelines Limited (e_1_2_7_2_1) 2019
e_1_2_7_30_1
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_31_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
e_1_2_7_32_1
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_33_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_34_1
e_1_2_7_21_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
e_1_2_7_36_1
e_1_2_7_37_1
References_xml – volume: 2
  start-page: 3
  year: 2014
  end-page: 12
  article-title: Antibiotic allergies in children and adults: from clinical symptoms to skin testing diagnosis
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
– volume: 62
  start-page: 51
  year: 2016
  end-page: 77
  article-title: Implementing an antibiotic stewardship program: guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
  publication-title: Clin Infect Dis
– volume: 68
  start-page: 702
  year: 2013
  end-page: 12
  article-title: Skin test concentrations for systemically administered drugs – an ENDA/EAACI drug allergy interest group position paper
  publication-title: Allergy
– volume: 64
  start-page: 183
  year: 2009
  end-page: 93
  article-title: Update on the evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to betalactams
  publication-title: Allergy
– volume: 74
  start-page: 1438
  year: 2019
  end-page: 46
  article-title: Implementation of a pharmacist‐led penicillin allergy de‐labelling service in a public hospital
  publication-title: J Antimicrob Chemother
– volume: 3
  start-page: 365
  year: 2015
  end-page: 74
  article-title: Improving the effectiveness of penicillin allergy De‐labeling
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
– volume: 137
  start-page: 1148
  year: 2016
  end-page: 53
  article-title: Consequences of avoiding β‐lactams in patients with β‐lactam allergies
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol
– volume: 5
  start-page: 926
  year: 2016
  end-page: 31
  article-title: The high impact of penicillin allergy registration in hospitalized patients
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
– volume: 177
  start-page: 67
  year: 2016
  end-page: 71
  article-title: Penicillin skin testing in hospitalized patients with β‐lactam allergies: effect on antibiotic selection and cost
  publication-title: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
– volume: 180
  start-page: 1
  year: 2020
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Development and validation of a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule
  publication-title: JAMA Intern Med
– volume: 1
  start-page: 258
  year: 2013
  end-page: 63
  article-title: Safely diagnosing clinically significant penicillin allergy using only penicilloyl‐poly‐lysine, penicillin, and oral amoxicillin
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
– volume: 45
  start-page: 300
  year: 2015
  end-page: 27
  article-title: Management of allergy to penicillins and other beta‐lactams
  publication-title: Clin Exp Allergy
– volume: 160
  start-page: 2819
  year: 2000
  end-page: 22
  article-title: The incidence of antimicrobial allergies in hospitalized patients implications regarding prescribing patterns and emerging bacterial resistance
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
– volume: 5
  start-page: 676
  year: 2017
  end-page: 83
  article-title: Positive skin test or specific IgE to penicillin does not reliably predict penicillin allergy
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
– volume: 5
  start-page: 686
  year: 2017
  end-page: 93
  article-title: Proactive approach to penicillin allergy testing in hospitalized patients
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
– volume: 103
  start-page: 918
  year: 1999
  end-page: 24
  article-title: Natural evolution of skin test sensitivity in patients allergic to β‐lactam antibiotics
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol
– volume: 40
  start-page: 57
  year: 2019
  end-page: 61
  article-title: Direct oral amoxicillin challenge without preliminary skin testing in adult patients with allergy and at low risk with reported penicillin allergy
  publication-title: Allergy Asthma Proc
– volume: 133
  start-page: 790
  year: 2014
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Health care use and serious infection prevalence associated with penicillin ‘allergy’ in hospitalized patients: a cohort study
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol
– volume: 29
  start-page: 509
  year: 2017
  end-page: 15
  article-title: De‐labelling self‐reported penicillin allergy within the emergency department through the use of skin tests and oral drug provocation testing
  publication-title: Emerg Med Australas
– volume: 17
  start-page: 12
  year: 2018
  article-title: The safety and efficacy of an oral penicillin challenge program in cancer patients: a multicenter pilot study
  publication-title: Open Forum Infect Dis
– volume: 3
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Implementation of an infectious disease fellow‐managed penicillin allergy skin testing service
  publication-title: Open Forum Infect Dis
– volume: 1
  start-page: 252
  year: 2013
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Treatment of patients with a history of penicillin allergy in a large tertiary‐care academic hospital
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
– volume: 173
  start-page: 1376
  year: 2013
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Management of antimicrobial allergies by infectious diseases physicians
  publication-title: JAMA Intern Med
– volume: 105
  start-page: 259
  year: 2010
  end-page: 73
  article-title: Drug allergy: an updated practice parameter
  publication-title: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
– volume: 5
  start-page: 669
  year: 2017
  end-page: 75
  article-title: Oral challenge without skin testing safely excludes clinically significant delayed‐onset penicillin hypersensitivity
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
– volume: 31
  start-page: 742
  year: 2011
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Impact of an antimicrobial allergy label in the medical record on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients
  publication-title: Pharmacotherapy
– volume: 115
  start-page: 294
  year: 2015
  end-page: 300
  article-title: Impact of a clinical guideline for prescribing antibiotics to inpatients reporting penicillin or cephalosporin allergy
  publication-title: Asthma Immunol
– volume: 5
  start-page: 813
  year: 2017
  end-page: 15
  article-title: Amoxicillin challenge without penicillin skin testing in evaluation of penicillin allergy in a cohort of marine recruits
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
– volume: 68
  start-page: 1057
  year: 2013
  end-page: 64
  article-title: Diagnosis of penicillin allergy revisited: the value of case history, skin testing, specific IgE and prolonged challenge
  publication-title: Allergy
– volume: 113
  start-page: 764
  year: 2004
  end-page: 70
  article-title: Represcription of penicillin after allergic‐like events
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol
– volume: 98
  start-page: 357
  year: 2006
  end-page: 62
  article-title: The prevalence of suspected and challenge‐verified penicillin allergy in a university hospital population
  publication-title: Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol
– volume: 33
  start-page: 501
  year: 2003
  end-page: 6
  article-title: The economic burden of antibiotic treatment of penicillin‐allergic patients in internal medicine wards of a general tertiary care hospital
  publication-title: Clin Exp Allergy
– year: 2019
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1348
  year: 2008
  end-page: 53
  article-title: Antibiotic allergies in the medical record: effect on drug selection and assessment of validity
  publication-title: Pharmacotherapy
– volume: 5
  start-page: 705
  year: 2017
  end-page: 10
  article-title: The effect of penicillin allergy testing on future health care utilization: a matched cohort study
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1088
  year: 2014
  end-page: 92
  article-title: A real‐time prospective evaluation of clinical pharmaco‐economic impact of diagnostic label of ‘penicillin allergy’ in a UK teaching hospital
  publication-title: J Clin Pathol
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.01.023
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1111/cea.12468
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
  doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw155
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.18.2819
– ident: e_1_2_7_37_1
  doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0403
– ident: e_1_2_7_33_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70439-2
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.02.002
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.09.045
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.04.021
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.01.006
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.11.006
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6480
– volume: 17
  start-page: 12
  year: 2018
  ident: e_1_2_7_35_1
  article-title: The safety and efficacy of an oral penicillin challenge program in cancer patients: a multicenter pilot study
  publication-title: Open Forum Infect Dis
  contributor:
    fullname: Trubiano JA
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.012
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1592/phco.31.8.742
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.021
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01638.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
  doi: 10.1093/jac/dky575
– ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.11.002
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12774
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
  doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4184
– ident: e_1_2_7_36_1
  doi: 10.1111/all.12195
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.026
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw118
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.03.014
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202438
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1111/all.12142
– ident: e_1_2_7_31_1
  doi: 10.1592/phco.28.11.1348
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.08.002
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.03.009
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01924.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_34_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.11.032
– volume-title: Management of Patients Reporting Hypersensitivity to Penicillins
  year: 2019
  ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.011
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_230.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_32_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.023
SSID ssj0017394
Score 2.4348726
Snippet Background Penicillin allergy is the most reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Being labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ is associated with suboptimal...
Penicillin allergy is the most reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Being labelled with 'penicillin allergy' is associated with suboptimal antibiotic therapy...
Abstract Background Penicillin allergy is the most reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Being labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ is associated with suboptimal...
BackgroundPenicillin allergy is the most reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Being labelled with ‘penicillin allergy’ is associated with suboptimal...
BACKGROUNDPenicillin allergy is the most reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Being labelled with 'penicillin allergy' is associated with suboptimal...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 295
SubjectTerms adverse drug reaction
Allergies
allergy
Amoxicillin
Amoxicillin - adverse effects
Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects
antibiotic
Antibiotics
drug challenge
Drug Hypersensitivity - diagnosis
Drug Hypersensitivity - epidemiology
Humans
Immunoglobulin E
Labeling
Patients
Penicillin
Penicillins - adverse effects
Skin Tests
Title Oral amoxicillin challenge for low‐risk penicillin allergic patients
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fimj.14978
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32672891
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2630678652
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2424445175
Volume 52
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8QwEB4WD-LF96O6ShUPXiq2SZMtnkRdVFgFUfAglCRNQHS7yz5QPPkT_I3-EifpA1cRxFtpJn1kMpNvknkA7IaZYAda8SDKGA2o4CZoaUYCk0hKiOCUaRuc3LlkZ7f04i6-a8BhFQtT5IeoN9ysZDh9bQVcyOEXIX_oWjFHIwj1b0i4dec6ua5TR4WcuCKIaC9QtxdRZhWyXjx1z8m16AfAnMSrbsFpz8F99amFn8nj_ngk99XrtyyO__yXeZgtgah_VMycBWjofBGmO-VR-xK0rwbYLLq9F7xhE3f7qqq74iPQ9Z96zx9v79Yz3e_rvKKxFANUpn6Zr3W4DLft05vjs6AsuhAoYpVflGQC2aaUakWcKyOTzFBGZUzDJJM05gIBm85cjV9zoKVEe0sTgzDIKMUySlZgKu_leg38TEZS40MRMhlKNPZOqOJxKDg2JIR4sFMNf9ovcmuklU2CI5K6EfGgWTEmLcVrmEbMWjotFkcebNfNKBj2tEPkujdGGhvCR2OERx6sFgyt34KYlaOlGXqw59jy--vT886Fu1j_O-kGzEQ2SML5djdhajQY602ELiO55eboJ2fQ6mc
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,1378,27936,27937,46306,46730
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bS8MwFD7oBPXF-6Veq_jgS8fapMkKvog65mUTRMEXKU2agui6MTcUn_wJ_kZ_iSfpBacI4ltpTpo0Jyf5TnIuAHtuHLGaktzxYkYdGvHEqStGnCQQlJCIU6a0c3KrzZo39OzWvx2Dg8IXJosPUR64ackw67UWcH0g_UXK7ztazlELGocJFHeiEzccX5XBo1xOTBpE1BioOY3I4wppO56y6uhu9ANijiJWs-U0ZuGu6GxmafJQHQ5EVb5-i-P437-Zg5kci9qH2eSZhzGVLsBkK79tX4TGZR-Lo073BV_o2N22LFKv2Ih17cfu88fbuzZOt3sqLWg0RR_XUzsP2fq0BDeNk-ujppPnXXAk0eufF8QRck5KWfc4l4kI4oQyKnzqBrGgPo8Qs6nYpPlNakoIVLkUSRAJJVKymJJlqKTdVK2CHQtPKPwooqaEEoW1Ayq570YcCwJCLNgtxj_sZeE1wkItwREJzYhYsFFwJswl7Cn0mFZ26sz3LNgpi1E29IVHlKruEGm0Fx_1ESFZsJJxtGwFYStHZdO1YN_w5ffmw9PWmXlY-zvpNkw1r1sX4cVp-3wdpj3tM2FMvTegMugP1SYimYHYMhP2EwOg7n8
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9swFD5kGYS99N7Vbdq5ZQ97caktWYrZ02gXmrZJS1khDwVj3WBscUIubPSpP6G_cb9kR_KFZaMw-masI0vW0ZG-I50LwPtQZexESx5EitGAZtwEHc1IYBJBCck4Zdo6J_cH7PyOXgzjYQM-Vr4wRXyI-sDNSoZbr62AT5T5Q8i_jqyYoxL0Cl5ThsjXIqLbOnZUyInLgogKA3WHEWVYIWvGU1dd3oz-QZjLgNXtON1VuK_6WhiafDtezMWxfPgrjOMLf2YNVkok6n8qps46NHS-Aa1-ede-Cd3rKRZno_FPfGEjd_uySrziI9L1v49__Hp8sqbp_kTnFY2lmOJq6pcBW2dbcNf9_OX0PCizLgSS2NUvSlSGfJNSdiLOpRGJMpRREdMwUYLGPEPEppVL8mtOtBCocGliEAcZKZmiZBua-TjXO-ArEQmNH0XMZCjRWDuhksdhxrEgIcSDo2r400kRXCOtlBIckdSNiAftijFpKV-zNLIM5x0WRx4c1sUoGfa6I8v1eIE01oePxoiPPHhbMLRuBUErR1Uz9OCDY8vzzae9_oV72P1_0nfQujnrple9weUevImsw4Sz825Dcz5d6H2EMXNx4Kbrb04s7S4
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oral+amoxicillin+challenge+for+low%E2%80%90risk+penicillin+allergic+patients&rft.jtitle=Internal+medicine+journal&rft.au=Livirya%2C+Silabhakta&rft.au=Pithie%2C+Alan&rft.au=Chua%2C+Ignatius&rft.au=Hamilton%2C+Niall&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.issn=1444-0903&rft.eissn=1445-5994&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fimj.14978&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_imj_14978
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1444-0903&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1444-0903&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1444-0903&client=summon