Pericardial access via wire‐guided puncture without contrast: The feasibility and safety of a modified approach
Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of wire‐guided pericardial access without contrast. Methods From January 2014 to February 2019, patients who received epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia in the Beijing Anzhen Hospital were entered into the current study. The...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 30 - 37 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.01.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1045-3873 1540-8167 1540-8167 |
DOI | 10.1111/jce.14237 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objective
To investigate the feasibility and safety of wire‐guided pericardial access without contrast.
Methods
From January 2014 to February 2019, patients who received epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia in the Beijing Anzhen Hospital were entered into the current study. They were divided into contrast‐guided access group or wire‐guided access group according to the pericardial puncture technique used. The baseline variables, procedure parameters, complications were collected and compared.
Results
During the study period, a consecutive of 73 patients received epicardial access. The initial 32 patients received contrast‐guided puncture with success achieved in 30 patients, the remaining 41 patients underwent wire‐guided puncture with success achieved in 40 patients (30/32 and 40/41, P = .581). Fluoroscopy time (4.45 ± 0.52 and 4.38 ± 0.46 minutes, P = .891) and access time (5.14 ± 0.58 and 5.34 ± 0.50 minutes, P = .657) were comparable between the two groups. Inadvertent right ventricular puncture occurred more commonly in the contrast‐guided group (5/32 and 1/41, P = .038). Though more pericardial effusions (2/32 and 1/41, P = .575), tamponade (2/32 and 1/41, P = .575), and surgical repair (1/32 and 0/41, P = .432) occurred in the contrast‐guided group, they reached no statistical difference.
Conclusion
Wire‐guided pericardial puncture exhibits better safety and similar success rates to contrast‐guided technique with a trend towards less complications. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To investigate the feasibility and safety of wire-guided pericardial access without contrast.OBJECTIVETo investigate the feasibility and safety of wire-guided pericardial access without contrast.From January 2014 to February 2019, patients who received epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia in the Beijing Anzhen Hospital were entered into the current study. They were divided into contrast-guided access group or wire-guided access group according to the pericardial puncture technique used. The baseline variables, procedure parameters, complications were collected and compared.METHODSFrom January 2014 to February 2019, patients who received epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia in the Beijing Anzhen Hospital were entered into the current study. They were divided into contrast-guided access group or wire-guided access group according to the pericardial puncture technique used. The baseline variables, procedure parameters, complications were collected and compared.During the study period, a consecutive of 73 patients received epicardial access. The initial 32 patients received contrast-guided puncture with success achieved in 30 patients, the remaining 41 patients underwent wire-guided puncture with success achieved in 40 patients (30/32 and 40/41, P = .581). Fluoroscopy time (4.45 ± 0.52 and 4.38 ± 0.46 minutes, P = .891) and access time (5.14 ± 0.58 and 5.34 ± 0.50 minutes, P = .657) were comparable between the two groups. Inadvertent right ventricular puncture occurred more commonly in the contrast-guided group (5/32 and 1/41, P = .038). Though more pericardial effusions (2/32 and 1/41, P = .575), tamponade (2/32 and 1/41, P = .575), and surgical repair (1/32 and 0/41, P = .432) occurred in the contrast-guided group, they reached no statistical difference.RESULTSDuring the study period, a consecutive of 73 patients received epicardial access. The initial 32 patients received contrast-guided puncture with success achieved in 30 patients, the remaining 41 patients underwent wire-guided puncture with success achieved in 40 patients (30/32 and 40/41, P = .581). Fluoroscopy time (4.45 ± 0.52 and 4.38 ± 0.46 minutes, P = .891) and access time (5.14 ± 0.58 and 5.34 ± 0.50 minutes, P = .657) were comparable between the two groups. Inadvertent right ventricular puncture occurred more commonly in the contrast-guided group (5/32 and 1/41, P = .038). Though more pericardial effusions (2/32 and 1/41, P = .575), tamponade (2/32 and 1/41, P = .575), and surgical repair (1/32 and 0/41, P = .432) occurred in the contrast-guided group, they reached no statistical difference.Wire-guided pericardial puncture exhibits better safety and similar success rates to contrast-guided technique with a trend towards less complications.CONCLUSIONWire-guided pericardial puncture exhibits better safety and similar success rates to contrast-guided technique with a trend towards less complications. ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and safety of wire‐guided pericardial access without contrast.MethodsFrom January 2014 to February 2019, patients who received epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia in the Beijing Anzhen Hospital were entered into the current study. They were divided into contrast‐guided access group or wire‐guided access group according to the pericardial puncture technique used. The baseline variables, procedure parameters, complications were collected and compared.ResultsDuring the study period, a consecutive of 73 patients received epicardial access. The initial 32 patients received contrast‐guided puncture with success achieved in 30 patients, the remaining 41 patients underwent wire‐guided puncture with success achieved in 40 patients (30/32 and 40/41, P = .581). Fluoroscopy time (4.45 ± 0.52 and 4.38 ± 0.46 minutes, P = .891) and access time (5.14 ± 0.58 and 5.34 ± 0.50 minutes, P = .657) were comparable between the two groups. Inadvertent right ventricular puncture occurred more commonly in the contrast‐guided group (5/32 and 1/41, P = .038). Though more pericardial effusions (2/32 and 1/41, P = .575), tamponade (2/32 and 1/41, P = .575), and surgical repair (1/32 and 0/41, P = .432) occurred in the contrast‐guided group, they reached no statistical difference.ConclusionWire‐guided pericardial puncture exhibits better safety and similar success rates to contrast‐guided technique with a trend towards less complications. Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of wire‐guided pericardial access without contrast. Methods From January 2014 to February 2019, patients who received epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia in the Beijing Anzhen Hospital were entered into the current study. They were divided into contrast‐guided access group or wire‐guided access group according to the pericardial puncture technique used. The baseline variables, procedure parameters, complications were collected and compared. Results During the study period, a consecutive of 73 patients received epicardial access. The initial 32 patients received contrast‐guided puncture with success achieved in 30 patients, the remaining 41 patients underwent wire‐guided puncture with success achieved in 40 patients (30/32 and 40/41, P = .581). Fluoroscopy time (4.45 ± 0.52 and 4.38 ± 0.46 minutes, P = .891) and access time (5.14 ± 0.58 and 5.34 ± 0.50 minutes, P = .657) were comparable between the two groups. Inadvertent right ventricular puncture occurred more commonly in the contrast‐guided group (5/32 and 1/41, P = .038). Though more pericardial effusions (2/32 and 1/41, P = .575), tamponade (2/32 and 1/41, P = .575), and surgical repair (1/32 and 0/41, P = .432) occurred in the contrast‐guided group, they reached no statistical difference. Conclusion Wire‐guided pericardial puncture exhibits better safety and similar success rates to contrast‐guided technique with a trend towards less complications. To investigate the feasibility and safety of wire-guided pericardial access without contrast. From January 2014 to February 2019, patients who received epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia in the Beijing Anzhen Hospital were entered into the current study. They were divided into contrast-guided access group or wire-guided access group according to the pericardial puncture technique used. The baseline variables, procedure parameters, complications were collected and compared. During the study period, a consecutive of 73 patients received epicardial access. The initial 32 patients received contrast-guided puncture with success achieved in 30 patients, the remaining 41 patients underwent wire-guided puncture with success achieved in 40 patients (30/32 and 40/41, P = .581). Fluoroscopy time (4.45 ± 0.52 and 4.38 ± 0.46 minutes, P = .891) and access time (5.14 ± 0.58 and 5.34 ± 0.50 minutes, P = .657) were comparable between the two groups. Inadvertent right ventricular puncture occurred more commonly in the contrast-guided group (5/32 and 1/41, P = .038). Though more pericardial effusions (2/32 and 1/41, P = .575), tamponade (2/32 and 1/41, P = .575), and surgical repair (1/32 and 0/41, P = .432) occurred in the contrast-guided group, they reached no statistical difference. Wire-guided pericardial puncture exhibits better safety and similar success rates to contrast-guided technique with a trend towards less complications. |
Author | Ma, Chang‐Sheng Wang, Wei Zhao, Xin Long, De‐Yong Li, Meng‐Meng Li, Song‐Nan Jiang, Chen‐Xi Du, Xin Tang, Ri‐Bo Guo, Xue‐Yuan Sun, Li‐Ping Dong, Jian‐Zeng Sang, Cai‐Hua |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: De‐Yong orcidid: 0000-0003-4604-5346 surname: Long fullname: Long, De‐Yong email: dragon2008@vip.sina.com organization: Capital Medical University – sequence: 2 givenname: Li‐Ping surname: Sun fullname: Sun, Li‐Ping organization: The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University – sequence: 3 givenname: Cai‐Hua surname: Sang fullname: Sang, Cai‐Hua organization: Capital Medical University – sequence: 4 givenname: Chen‐Xi surname: Jiang fullname: Jiang, Chen‐Xi organization: Capital Medical University – sequence: 5 givenname: Xue‐Yuan surname: Guo fullname: Guo, Xue‐Yuan organization: Capital Medical University – sequence: 6 givenname: Meng‐Meng surname: Li fullname: Li, Meng‐Meng organization: Capital Medical University – sequence: 7 givenname: Song‐Nan surname: Li fullname: Li, Song‐Nan organization: Capital Medical University – sequence: 8 givenname: Xin surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Xin organization: Capital Medical University – sequence: 9 givenname: Wei surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Wei organization: Capital Medical University – sequence: 10 givenname: Ri‐Bo surname: Tang fullname: Tang, Ri‐Bo organization: Capital Medical University – sequence: 11 givenname: Jian‐Zeng orcidid: 0000-0001-7299-7805 surname: Dong fullname: Dong, Jian‐Zeng organization: Capital Medical University – sequence: 12 givenname: Xin surname: Du fullname: Du, Xin organization: Capital Medical University – sequence: 13 givenname: Chang‐Sheng orcidid: 0000-0001-6966-6239 surname: Ma fullname: Ma, Chang‐Sheng organization: Capital Medical University |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kU1uFDEQhS0URJKBBRdAltjAohP_u4ddNAp_igSLsG5V29WMRz3tie0mmh1H4IycBJMJLCJBbVyyvnplv3dKjqY4ISHPOTvjtc43Ds-4EtI-IidcK9a03Nij2jOlG9laeUxOc94wxqVh-gk5ltwII409ITefMQUHyQcYKTiHOdNvAehtSPjz-4-vc_Do6W6eXJkT1uuyjnOhLk4lQS5v6PUa6YCQQx_GUPYUJk8zDFjbOFCg2-jDEKoG7HYpgls_JY8HGDM-uz8X5Mvby-vV--bq07sPq4urxkktbaOFQymBm161sGRGaem5AGVsL7xy2rD6Ma1Mi045vnRWemmhNX2PKIzXckFeHXTr2psZc-m2ITscR5gwzrkTklmumahGLMjLB-gmzmmqr6uUbGstRVupF_fU3G_Rd7sUtpD23R8zK_D6ALgUc044_EU4634H1dWgurugKnv-gHWhQAl3vobxfxO3YcT9v6W7j6vLw8QvGRikFw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_jce_14235 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ccep_2020_04_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacep_2020_07_027 crossref_primary_10_1111_jce_16069 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_021_21682_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacep_2024_05_004 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2024_1290574 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00559.x 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.045 10.1016/j.iccl.2013.12.003 10.1002/ccd.25698 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000021 10.1016/j.hrcr.2018.08.002 10.1111/jce.12643 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.03.073 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.02.033 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00236.x 10.1111/jce.13296 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.11.002 10.1016/S0972-6292(16)30564-2 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.960799 10.1023/B:JICE.0000026925.41543.7c 10.1093/bja/85.2.238 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002921 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. – notice: 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7QP K9. 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/jce.14237 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology Biology |
EISSN | 1540-8167 |
EndPage | 37 |
ExternalDocumentID | 31626367 10_1111_jce_14237 JCE14237 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Key R&D Program of China funderid: 2017YFC1307800 – fundername: National Science Foundation of China funderid: 81770326 – fundername: National Science Foundation of China grantid: 81770326 – fundername: National Key R&D Program of China grantid: 2017YFC1307800 |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 04C 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29K 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACIWK ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOJX ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AHMBA AIACR AIAGR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMSDO BMXJE BPMNR BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F D-I DC6 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EAD EAP EAS EBC EBD EBS ECF ECT ECV EIHBH EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ENC EPT ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 Q~Q R.K RIWAO ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 V8K VVN W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQ9 WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 ZGI ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAYXX ACDOS AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION NPM 7QP AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY K9. 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-52ce33a16b48a906453d12a467b2d4c5603875468ec4c19c73d37a86bbee26d53 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1045-3873 1540-8167 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 16:06:44 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 20:01:18 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:31:58 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:54:09 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:42 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:37:52 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | tamponade pericardium pericardial puncture wire-guided method |
Language | English |
License | 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3537-52ce33a16b48a906453d12a467b2d4c5603875468ec4c19c73d37a86bbee26d53 |
Notes | Disclosures None. De‐yong Long and Li‐ping Sun are joint first authors. They contributed equally to this paper. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-4604-5346 0000-0001-6966-6239 0000-0001-7299-7805 |
PMID | 31626367 |
PQID | 2338888928 |
PQPubID | 1086397 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2307150226 proquest_journals_2338888928 pubmed_primary_31626367 crossref_primary_10_1111_jce_14237 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_jce_14237 wiley_primary_10_1111_jce_14237_JCE14237 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | January 2020 2020-01-00 2020-Jan 20200101 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2020 text: January 2020 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | 2004; 10 2015; 12 2015; 26 2014; 3 2017; 3 2018; 4 2017; 14 2017; 28 2015; 86 2000; 85 2009; 100 2014; 29 2004; 1 2011; 4 2005; 28 2012; 12 2015; 8 1996; 7 e_1_2_9_20_1 Buch E (e_1_2_9_5_1) 2009; 100 e_1_2_9_11_1 e_1_2_9_10_1 e_1_2_9_13_1 e_1_2_9_12_1 e_1_2_9_8_1 e_1_2_9_7_1 e_1_2_9_6_1 e_1_2_9_4_1 e_1_2_9_3_1 e_1_2_9_2_1 e_1_2_9_9_1 e_1_2_9_15_1 e_1_2_9_14_1 e_1_2_9_17_1 e_1_2_9_16_1 e_1_2_9_19_1 e_1_2_9_18_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 26 start-page: 576 issue: 5 year: 2015 end-page: 580 article-title: A novel toolkit to improve percutaneous subxiphoid needle access to the healthy pericardial sac publication-title: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol – volume: 28 start-page: 1018 issue: 10 year: 2005 end-page: 1024 article-title: Transvenous access to the pericardial space: an approach to epicardial lead implantation for cardiac resynchronization therapy publication-title: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol – volume: 85 start-page: 238 issue: 2 year: 2000 end-page: 241 article-title: How much work is required to puncture dura with Tuohy needles? publication-title: Br J Anaesth – volume: 12 start-page: 1691 issue: 7 year: 2015 end-page: 1697 article-title: “Needle‐in‐needle” epicardial access: Preliminary observations with a modified technique for facilitating epicardial interventional procedures publication-title: Heart Rhythm – volume: 86 start-page: E111 issue: 2 year: 2015 end-page: E118 article-title: Intentional right atrial exit for microcatheter infusion of pericardial carbon dioxide or iodinated contrast to facilitate sub‐xiphoid access publication-title: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv – volume: 4 start-page: 534 issue: 11 year: 2018 end-page: 537 article-title: Damage to the left internal mammary artery during anterior epicardial access for ventricular tachycardia ablation publication-title: HeartRhythm Case Rep – volume: 3 start-page: 514 issue: 5 year: 2017 end-page: 521 article-title: Coronary vein exit and carbon dioxide insufflation to facilitate subxiphoid epicardial access for ventricular mapping and ablation: first experience publication-title: JACC Clin Electrophysiol – volume: 12 start-page: 250 issue: 6 year: 2012 end-page: 268 article-title: Epicardial ablation for ventricular tachycardia publication-title: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J – volume: 1 start-page: 311 issue: 3 year: 2004 end-page: 316 article-title: Percutaneous epicardial mapping during ablation of difficult accessory pathways as an alternative to cardiac surgery publication-title: Heart Rhythm – volume: 7 start-page: 531 issue: 6 year: 1996 end-page: 536 article-title: A new technique to perform epicardial mapping in the electrophysiology laboratory publication-title: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol – volume: 29 start-page: 59 issue: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 67 article-title: Epicardial ablation for cardiac arrhythmias: techniques, indications and results publication-title: Curr Opin Cardiol – volume: 28 start-page: 1189 issue: 10 year: 2017 end-page: 1195 article-title: Anterior pericardial access to facilitate electrophysiology study and catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: a single tertiary center experience publication-title: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol – volume: 14 start-page: 981 issue: 7 year: 2017 end-page: 988 article-title: Initial international multicenter human experience with a novel epicardial access needle embedded with a real‐time pressure/frequency monitoring to facilitate epicardial access: feasibility and safety publication-title: Heart Rhythm – volume: 10 start-page: 281 issue: 3 year: 2004 end-page: 288 article-title: Nonsurgical transthoracic epicardial approach in patients with ventricular tachycardia and previous cardiac surgery publication-title: J Interv Card Electrophysiol – volume: 8 start-page: 890 issue: 4 year: 2015 end-page: 895 article-title: Differences in complication rates between large bore needle and a long micropuncture needle during epicardial access: time to change clinical practice? publication-title: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol – volume: 100 start-page: 151 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 157 article-title: Epicardial catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation publication-title: Minerva Med – volume: 3 start-page: 281 issue: 2 year: 2014 end-page: 289 article-title: Pericardial access for LARIAT left atrial appendage closure publication-title: Interv Cardiol Clin – volume: 4 start-page: 331 issue: 3 year: 2011 end-page: 336 article-title: Percutaneous transatrial access to the pericardial space for epicardial mapping and ablation publication-title: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol – ident: e_1_2_9_9_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00559.x – ident: e_1_2_9_17_1 doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.045 – volume: 100 start-page: 151 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_9_5_1 article-title: Epicardial catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation publication-title: Minerva Med – ident: e_1_2_9_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2013.12.003 – ident: e_1_2_9_10_1 doi: 10.1002/ccd.25698 – ident: e_1_2_9_20_1 doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000021 – ident: e_1_2_9_7_1 doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2018.08.002 – ident: e_1_2_9_13_1 doi: 10.1111/jce.12643 – ident: e_1_2_9_3_1 doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.03.073 – ident: e_1_2_9_18_1 doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.02.033 – ident: e_1_2_9_4_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00236.x – ident: e_1_2_9_11_1 doi: 10.1111/jce.13296 – ident: e_1_2_9_12_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.11.002 – ident: e_1_2_9_15_1 doi: 10.1016/S0972-6292(16)30564-2 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00559.x – ident: e_1_2_9_19_1 doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.960799 – ident: e_1_2_9_8_1 doi: 10.1023/B:JICE.0000026925.41543.7c – ident: e_1_2_9_14_1 doi: 10.1093/bja/85.2.238 – ident: e_1_2_9_16_1 doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002921 |
SSID | ssj0013605 |
Score | 2.3435762 |
Snippet | Objective
To investigate the feasibility and safety of wire‐guided pericardial access without contrast.
Methods
From January 2014 to February 2019, patients... To investigate the feasibility and safety of wire-guided pericardial access without contrast. From January 2014 to February 2019, patients who received... ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and safety of wire‐guided pericardial access without contrast.MethodsFrom January 2014 to February 2019, patients who... To investigate the feasibility and safety of wire-guided pericardial access without contrast.OBJECTIVETo investigate the feasibility and safety of wire-guided... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 30 |
SubjectTerms | Fluoroscopy Heart pericardial puncture pericardium Safety Success Tachycardia Tamponade Ventricle wire‐guided method |
Title | Pericardial access via wire‐guided puncture without contrast: The feasibility and safety of a modified approach |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjce.14237 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626367 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2338888928 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2307150226 |
Volume | 31 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3bahYxEB5KQfHGaqv21ypRRHqzxU022Y1e1dJSChURC70Qlslh5cd2t_rvCvWqj9Bn9EmcZA9aDyDuVWBnj5lJvjnkC8BTmiI0WnyeaF2pJFOuSApyhBKUhueIStsqhAYOX6v9o-zgWB4vwctxLUzPDzEF3IJlxPE6GDiaxc9Gbj2ZORdhJXmo1QqA6C3_kUHo10SStyEDf6wYWIViFc945dW56DeAeRWvxglnbwXej6_a15l83Opas2W__sLi-J_fcgtuDkCUbfeacxuWfL0Ka9s1OeGn5-wZi6WhMea-Ctdeja3rh0Mufg0-vYm5nqBgJwzjvovsyxxZID_-dnH5oZs779gZzZshScFCwLfpWhZr43HRvmCkoazyONTnnjOsHVtg5anZVAzZaePmFSFkNvKe34Gjvd13O_vJsIFDYoUUOTm51guBqTJZgTow4wmXcqSx2XCXWQJb1DMyU4W3mU21zYUTORbKGO-5clLcheW6qf06MO9TUh9yV720WVXoQuZGc4tSmFSg1jPYHLuytAO7edhk46ScvBzry_iPZ_BkEj3rKT3-JLQx6kM5WPWi5OTP06F5MYPH02myx5Bkwdo3XZAh0CYJGakZ3Ov1aHqKSAP3j6Kbb0Zt-Pvjy4Od3di4_--iD-AGD8GAGB_agOX2c-cfEmJqzaNoGt8BUdQQ1Q |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bT9VAEJ4gRuHFC4gcRV2NMbyU0N3utmt8QQI5IocYAwkvpplut-REaNHTmuCTP8Hf6C9xdntRvCTGPm3S6XVndq77DcBTUhEaDW4GWhcqiFSeBAk5QgHKjMeISpvChQYmB2p8FO0dy-M5eNHvhWnxIYaAm5MMv147AXcB6Z-l3FiScy7iK3DVdfT2DtVb_iOH0O6KJH9DOgRZ0eEK-Tqe_tLL2ug3E_OyxepVzu5NeNe_bFtp8n6jqbMN8_kXHMf__ZpbcKOzRdlWyzy3Yc6WS7C8VZIffnbBnjFfHerD7ktw7WU_uj7p0vHL8OGNT_c4Hjtl6Fsvsk9TZA7_-NuXryfNNLc5OyfV6fIUzMV8q6ZmvjweZ_VzRkzKCotdie4FwzJnMywsDauCITur8mlBRjLroc_vwNHuzuH2OOh6OARGSBGTn2usEBiqLEpQO3A8kYccaXnOeB4ZsrdoamSkEmsiE2oTi1zEmKgss5arXIoVmC-r0q4CszYkDiKP1UoTFYlOZJxpblCKLBSo9QjW-7lMTQdw7vpsnKaDo2Ns6v_xCJ4MpOctqsefiNZ6hkg7wZ6lnFx6OjRPRvB4OE0i6fIsWNqqcTRkt0kyjtQI7raMNDxFhA7-R9HN1z07_P3x6d72jh_c-3fSR7AwPpzsp_uvDl7fh0XuYgM-XLQG8_XHxj4gA6rOHno5-Q5O3hTw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9UwEB6VIiouLC3LgwIGIdRLqsaOnRhOpe1TKbSqEJV6QIomtoOeaJMH7wWpnPgJ_EZ-CWNngbJIiJwsZbJ6xv5m8WeAxzRFaDS4EWldqihRNosycoQilAVPEZU2pQ8N7B-o3aNk71geL8Czfi1Myw8xBNy8ZYTx2hv41JY_G7lxZOZcpBfgYqI2Mq_S26_5jxRCuyiS3A3pCWRFRysUynj6S89PRr8hzPOANcw446vwtn_XttDk_XozL9bN519oHP_zY67BlQ6Jss1Wda7DgquWYWWzIi_89Iw9YaE2NATdl-HS8761tN8l41fgw2FI9ngNO2EYNl5knybIPPvxty9f3zUT6yyb0sTpsxTMR3zrZs5CcTzO5k8ZqSgrHXYFumcMK8tmWDpq1iVDdlrbSUkQmfXE5zfgaLzzZms36nZwiIyQIiUv1zghMFZFkqH21HjCxhxpcC64TQyhLeoZmajMmcTE2qTCihQzVRTOcWWluAmLVV2528Cci0l_yF910iRlpjOZFpoblKKIBWo9grW-K3PT0Zv7XTZO8sHNMS4P_3gEjwbRacvp8Seh1V4f8s6sZzknh54OzbMRPBxOk0H6LAtWrm68DKE2SdBIjeBWq0fDU0TsyX8U3XwtaMPfH5_vbe2Exp1_F30AS4fb4_zVi4OXd-Ey94GBECtahcX5x8bdI_Q0L-4HK_kOHq0TqA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pericardial+access+via+wire%E2%80%90guided+puncture+without+contrast%3A+The+feasibility+and+safety+of+a+modified+approach&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+cardiovascular+electrophysiology&rft.au=Long%2C+De%E2%80%90Yong&rft.au=Sun%2C+Li%E2%80%90Ping&rft.au=Sang%2C+Cai%E2%80%90Hua&rft.au=Jiang%2C+Chen%E2%80%90Xi&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.issn=1045-3873&rft.eissn=1540-8167&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=37&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjce.14237&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fjce.14237&rft.externalDocID=JCE14237 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1045-3873&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1045-3873&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1045-3873&client=summon |