Two‐year protocol biopsy after kidney transplantation in clinically stable recipients – a retrospective study

Summary The idea of protocol biopsy is to detect subclinical pathologies, including rejection, recurrent disease, or infection for early intervention and adjustment of immunosuppressants. Nevertheless, it is not adopted by most clinicians because of its low yield rate and uncertain long‐term benefit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransplant international Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 185 - 193
Main Authors Chen, Chien‐Chia, Lin, Wei‐Chou, Lee, Chih‐Yuan, Yang, Ching‐Yao, Tsai, Meng‐Kun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Frontiers Media SA 01.01.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Summary The idea of protocol biopsy is to detect subclinical pathologies, including rejection, recurrent disease, or infection for early intervention and adjustment of immunosuppressants. Nevertheless, it is not adopted by most clinicians because of its low yield rate and uncertain long‐term benefits. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of protocol biopsy on renal function and allograft survival. A two‐year protocol biopsy was proposed for 190 stable patients; 68 of them accepted [protocol biopsy (PB) group], while 122 did not [nonprotocol biopsy (NPB) group]. The rejection diagnosis was made in 13 patients by protocol biopsy, and 11 of them had borderline rejection. In the following 5 years, graft survival was better in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0143). A total of 4 and 17 patients in the PB and NPB groups, respectively, had rejection events proven by indication biopsy. Renal function was better preserved in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0107) for patients with rejection events. Nevertheless, the survival benefit disappeared by a longer follow‐up period (12‐year, P = 0.2886). In conclusion, 2‐year protocol biopsy detects subclinical pathological changes in rejection and preserves renal function by early intervention so as to prolong graft survival within 5 years.
AbstractList The idea of protocol biopsy is to detect subclinical pathologies, including rejection, recurrent disease, or infection for early intervention and adjustment of immunosuppressants. Nevertheless, it is not adopted by most clinicians because of its low yield rate and uncertain long‐term benefits. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of protocol biopsy on renal function and allograft survival. A two‐year protocol biopsy was proposed for 190 stable patients; 68 of them accepted [protocol biopsy (PB) group], while 122 did not [nonprotocol biopsy (NPB) group]. The rejection diagnosis was made in 13 patients by protocol biopsy, and 11 of them had borderline rejection. In the following 5 years, graft survival was better in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0143). A total of 4 and 17 patients in the PB and NPB groups, respectively, had rejection events proven by indication biopsy. Renal function was better preserved in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0107) for patients with rejection events. Nevertheless, the survival benefit disappeared by a longer follow‐up period (12‐year, P = 0.2886). In conclusion, 2‐year protocol biopsy detects subclinical pathological changes in rejection and preserves renal function by early intervention so as to prolong graft survival within 5 years.
The idea of protocol biopsy is to detect subclinical pathologies, including rejection, recurrent disease, or infection for early intervention and adjustment of immunosuppressants. Nevertheless, it is not adopted by most clinicians because of its low yield rate and uncertain long-term benefits. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of protocol biopsy on renal function and allograft survival. A two-year protocol biopsy was proposed for 190 stable patients; 68 of them accepted [protocol biopsy (PB) group], while 122 did not [nonprotocol biopsy (NPB) group]. The rejection diagnosis was made in 13 patients by protocol biopsy, and 11 of them had borderline rejection. In the following 5 years, graft survival was better in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0143). A total of 4 and 17 patients in the PB and NPB groups, respectively, had rejection events proven by indication biopsy. Renal function was better preserved in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0107) for patients with rejection events. Nevertheless, the survival benefit disappeared by a longer follow-up period (12-year, P = 0.2886). In conclusion, 2-year protocol biopsy detects subclinical pathological changes in rejection and preserves renal function by early intervention so as to prolong graft survival within 5 years.The idea of protocol biopsy is to detect subclinical pathologies, including rejection, recurrent disease, or infection for early intervention and adjustment of immunosuppressants. Nevertheless, it is not adopted by most clinicians because of its low yield rate and uncertain long-term benefits. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of protocol biopsy on renal function and allograft survival. A two-year protocol biopsy was proposed for 190 stable patients; 68 of them accepted [protocol biopsy (PB) group], while 122 did not [nonprotocol biopsy (NPB) group]. The rejection diagnosis was made in 13 patients by protocol biopsy, and 11 of them had borderline rejection. In the following 5 years, graft survival was better in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0143). A total of 4 and 17 patients in the PB and NPB groups, respectively, had rejection events proven by indication biopsy. Renal function was better preserved in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0107) for patients with rejection events. Nevertheless, the survival benefit disappeared by a longer follow-up period (12-year, P = 0.2886). In conclusion, 2-year protocol biopsy detects subclinical pathological changes in rejection and preserves renal function by early intervention so as to prolong graft survival within 5 years.
The idea of protocol biopsy is to detect subclinical pathologies, including rejection, recurrent disease, or infection for early intervention and adjustment of immunosuppressants. Nevertheless, it is not adopted by most clinicians because of its low yield rate and uncertain long-term benefits. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of protocol biopsy on renal function and allograft survival. A two-year protocol biopsy was proposed for 190 stable patients; 68 of them accepted [protocol biopsy (PB) group], while 122 did not [nonprotocol biopsy (NPB) group]. The rejection diagnosis was made in 13 patients by protocol biopsy, and 11 of them had borderline rejection. In the following 5 years, graft survival was better in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0143). A total of 4 and 17 patients in the PB and NPB groups, respectively, had rejection events proven by indication biopsy. Renal function was better preserved in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0107) for patients with rejection events. Nevertheless, the survival benefit disappeared by a longer follow-up period (12-year, P = 0.2886). In conclusion, 2-year protocol biopsy detects subclinical pathological changes in rejection and preserves renal function by early intervention so as to prolong graft survival within 5 years.
Summary The idea of protocol biopsy is to detect subclinical pathologies, including rejection, recurrent disease, or infection for early intervention and adjustment of immunosuppressants. Nevertheless, it is not adopted by most clinicians because of its low yield rate and uncertain long‐term benefits. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of protocol biopsy on renal function and allograft survival. A two‐year protocol biopsy was proposed for 190 stable patients; 68 of them accepted [protocol biopsy (PB) group], while 122 did not [nonprotocol biopsy (NPB) group]. The rejection diagnosis was made in 13 patients by protocol biopsy, and 11 of them had borderline rejection. In the following 5 years, graft survival was better in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0143). A total of 4 and 17 patients in the PB and NPB groups, respectively, had rejection events proven by indication biopsy. Renal function was better preserved in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0107) for patients with rejection events. Nevertheless, the survival benefit disappeared by a longer follow‐up period (12‐year, P = 0.2886). In conclusion, 2‐year protocol biopsy detects subclinical pathological changes in rejection and preserves renal function by early intervention so as to prolong graft survival within 5 years.
Author Tsai, Meng‐Kun
Chen, Chien‐Chia
Lin, Wei‐Chou
Lee, Chih‐Yuan
Yang, Ching‐Yao
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Chien‐Chia
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1282-976X
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Chien‐Chia
  organization: National Taiwan University Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Wei‐Chou
  surname: Lin
  fullname: Lin, Wei‐Chou
  organization: National Taiwan University Hospital
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Chih‐Yuan
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Chih‐Yuan
  organization: National Taiwan University Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ching‐Yao
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Ching‐Yao
  organization: National Taiwan University Hospital
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Meng‐Kun
  surname: Tsai
  fullname: Tsai, Meng‐Kun
  email: mengkuntsai@ntu.edu.tw
  organization: National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33152140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kc1KHTEcxUOx1Kvtoi9QAt20i9F83sksi_RDEApyXYdM5j8Qm5uMSaYyOx9B6Bv6JE17rxvRbALhdw455xyhgxADIPSekhNaz2lJ7oTyVslXaEUFZw1jbXuAVqTjoiGqFYfoKOdrQghTkrxBh5xTyaggK3SzuY0Pd_cLmISnFEu00ePexSkv2IwFEv7lhgALLsmEPHkTiikuBuwCtt4FZ433C87F9B5wAusmB6Fk_HD3B5v6UFLME9jifkOl5mF5i16Pxmd4t7-P0dW3r5uzH83Fz-_nZ18uGssll42SLekGy20_mHHomLJ2PQ5Udt1a9MYKGAyVUo3CMEMVWa8HkJYZRjslWtZzfow-7XxrrJsZctFbly34GgHinDUTUhEuJCcV_fgEvY5zCvV3lWqlqiQXlfqwp-Z-C4OektuatOjHMitwugNszZwTjNq6XVu1POc1JfrfXLrOpf_PVRWfnygeTZ9j9-63zsPyMqg3l-c7xV-8Q6eL
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12103527
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_transproceed_2023_08_022
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_16907
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_34505
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijot_ijot_103_23
Cites_doi 10.1111/ajt.14431
10.1097/00007890-200206270-00023
10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.038
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03283.x
10.1056/NEJMra1802677
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01979.x
10.1111/ajt.13572
10.1016/S0041-1345(02)03162-7
10.1016/j.jfma.2015.11.006
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01502.x
10.2215/CJN.06720810
10.1097/TP.0b013e31822dc34f
10.1056/NEJMc1103007
10.1097/01.ASN.0000120370.35927.40
10.1016/j.kint.2016.08.030
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02726.x
10.1097/01.TP.0000128167.60172.CC
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03022.x
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03784.x
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01895.x
10.1097/TP.0b013e31823bb647
10.1111/ctr.12945
10.1111/ajt.13784
10.1056/NEJMoa067411
10.1097/TP.0000000000000183
10.1111/ajt.14625
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03312.x
10.1172/JCI90601
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03840.x
10.1056/NEJM199508103330601
10.3389/fimmu.2019.01944
10.1111/ajt.15197
10.1111/ajt.13423
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01105.x
10.3389/fimmu.2018.00275
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04013.x
10.1016/S0041-1345(99)00355-3
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright © 2021 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– notice: 2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2021 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7QO
7T5
8FD
FR3
H94
K9.
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1111/tri.13785
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Immunology Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Immunology Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Biotechnology Research Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1432-2277
EndPage 193
ExternalDocumentID 33152140
10_1111_tri_13785
TRI13785
Genre article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.86
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
10A
123
1OB
1OC
1SB
2.D
24P
28-
29Q
2JY
2VQ
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5HH
5LA
5QI
5RE
5VS
66C
6NX
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
9T4
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAFWJ
AAHHS
AAIAL
AANHP
AAONW
AAYZH
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMNI
ABOCM
ABPVW
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADIYS
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEFIE
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFEXP
AFGKR
AFLOW
AFPKN
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFZJQ
AHACP
AHBYD
AHEFC
AHMBA
AHSBF
AIACR
AIURR
AIWBW
AJAOE
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMBMR
AMKLP
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BBWZM
BDRZF
BGNMA
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DL5
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
GROUPED_DOAJ
H.X
HF~
HG6
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
I09
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
KDC
KOV
KOW
LAS
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M4Y
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NDZJH
NF~
NQS
NU0
O66
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
OIG
OK1
OVD
P19
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PGMZT
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QOK
QOS
R.K
R4E
RIG
RJQFR
ROL
RPM
RPX
RSV
RX1
S26
S28
SDE
SDH
SDM
SMD
SOJ
SUPJJ
SV3
T16
TEORI
TSK
TSV
U2A
UB1
VC2
W2D
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIB
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WJK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WXI
XG1
ZZTAW
~EX
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
AGQPQ
CITATION
NPM
7QO
7T5
8FD
FR3
H94
K9.
P64
WIN
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-85709dc3cbdafd928cc6fd159964bac4eda1558f4a2a18066de5c2a2198472b33
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0934-0874
1432-2277
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 02:28:47 EDT 2025
Sun Jul 27 14:37:43 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:29:48 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:06:27 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:36 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:32:20 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords borderline rejection
protocol biopsy
subclinical rejection
kidney transplantation
Language English
License http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3535-85709dc3cbdafd928cc6fd159964bac4eda1558f4a2a18066de5c2a2198472b33
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-1282-976X
PMID 33152140
PQID 2475845834
PQPubID 29792
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2458034530
proquest_journals_2475845834
pubmed_primary_33152140
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_tri_13785
crossref_primary_10_1111_tri_13785
wiley_primary_10_1111_tri_13785_TRI13785
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate January 2021
2021-01-00
2021-Jan
20210101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2021
  text: January 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Groningen
PublicationTitle Transplant international
PublicationTitleAlternate Transpl Int
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Frontiers Media SA
Publisher_xml – name: Frontiers Media SA
References 2009; 23
2010; 10
2002; 73
2019; 10
2002; 34
2011; 11
2019; 19
2006; 6
1995; 333
2012; 12
2016; 16
2007; 357
2012; 93
2017; 31
2018; 18
2018; 9
2017; 91
2011; 92
2004; 15
2018; 379
2004; 78
2009; 9
2007; 7
1999; 31
2016; 115
2005; 37
2010; 5
2018; 16
2011; 364
2017; 127
2014; 98
e_1_2_9_30_1
e_1_2_9_31_1
e_1_2_9_11_1
e_1_2_9_34_1
e_1_2_9_10_1
e_1_2_9_35_1
e_1_2_9_13_1
e_1_2_9_12_1
e_1_2_9_33_1
Lim WH (e_1_2_9_32_1) 2019; 10
e_1_2_9_15_1
e_1_2_9_38_1
e_1_2_9_14_1
e_1_2_9_39_1
e_1_2_9_17_1
e_1_2_9_36_1
e_1_2_9_16_1
e_1_2_9_37_1
e_1_2_9_19_1
e_1_2_9_18_1
e_1_2_9_20_1
e_1_2_9_22_1
e_1_2_9_21_1
e_1_2_9_24_1
e_1_2_9_23_1
e_1_2_9_8_1
e_1_2_9_7_1
e_1_2_9_6_1
e_1_2_9_5_1
e_1_2_9_4_1
e_1_2_9_3_1
e_1_2_9_2_1
e_1_2_9_9_1
e_1_2_9_26_1
Zachariah MS (e_1_2_9_25_1) 2018; 16
e_1_2_9_28_1
e_1_2_9_27_1
e_1_2_9_29_1
References_xml – volume: 11
  start-page: 450
  year: 2011
  article-title: Long‐term renal allograft survival in the United States: a critical reappraisal
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 91
  start-page: 304
  year: 2017
  article-title: Recent advances in our understanding of recurrent primary glomerulonephritis after kidney transplantation
  publication-title: Kidney Int
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1183
  year: 2016
  article-title: Using molecular phenotyping to guide improvements in the histologic diagnosis of T cell‐mediated rejection
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 31
  year: 2017
  article-title: Kidney allograft surveillance biopsy practices across US transplant centers: a UNOS survey
  publication-title: Clin Transplant
– volume: 18
  start-page: 180
  year: 2018
  article-title: Renal allograft histology at 10 years after transplantation in the tacrolimus era: evidence of pervasive chronic injury
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 115
  start-page: 426
  year: 2016
  article-title: Renal transplantation across the donor‐specific antibody barrier: graft outcome and cancer risk after desensitization therapy
  publication-title: J Formos Med Assoc
– volume: 18
  start-page: 293
  year: 2018
  article-title: The Banff 2017 kidney meeting report: revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell‐mediated rejection, antibody‐mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next‐generation clinical trials
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 12
  start-page: 388
  year: 2012
  article-title: Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody‐mediated rejection and nonadherence
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 6
  start-page: 2535
  year: 2006
  article-title: Recurrent glomerulonephritis after kidney transplantation
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 127
  start-page: 2523
  year: 2017
  article-title: Aging and the immune response to organ transplantation
  publication-title: J Clin Invest
– volume: 333
  start-page: 333
  year: 1995
  article-title: High survival rates of kidney transplants from spousal and living unrelated donors
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1052
  year: 2004
  article-title: Patient and graft survival in older kidney transplant recipients: does age matter?
  publication-title: J Am Soc Nephrol JASN
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1944
  year: 2019
  article-title: Recurrent and de novo glomerulonephritis after kidney transplantation
  publication-title: Front Immunol
– volume: 98
  start-page: 427
  year: 2014
  article-title: The histology of kidney transplant failure: a long‐term follow‐up study
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 10
  start-page: 987
  issue: 4 Pt 2
  year: 2010
  article-title: Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1999–2008: the changing face of living donation
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1452
  year: 2019
  article-title: The clinical and pathological significance of borderline T cell‐mediated rejection
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1876
  year: 2009
  article-title: Calcineurin inhibitor minimization in the symphony study: observational results 3 years after transplantation
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 7
  start-page: 2124
  year: 2007
  article-title: Transplant glomerulopathy: subclinical incidence and association with alloantibody
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 16
  start-page: 194
  year: 2016
  article-title: Changing kidney allograft histology early posttransplant: prognostic implications of 1‐year protocol biopsies
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 16
  start-page: 391
  year: 2018
  article-title: Utility of serial protocol biopsies performed after 1 year in predicting long‐term kidney allograft function according to histologic phenotype
  publication-title: Exp Clin Transplant
– volume: 379
  start-page: 1150
  year: 2018
  article-title: Antibody‐mediated rejection of solid‐organ allografts
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 31
  start-page: 2314
  year: 1999
  article-title: Borderline changes in kidney transplantation: evolution of treated cases versus nontreated
  publication-title: Transplant Proc
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1157
  year: 2012
  article-title: Evolution and clinical pathologic correlations of de novo donor‐specific HLA antibody post kidney transplant
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 9
  start-page: 275
  year: 2018
  article-title: CD4+ T cell help is mandatory for naive and memory donor‐specific antibody responses: impact of therapeutic immunosuppression
  publication-title: Front Immunol
– volume: 93
  start-page: 41
  year: 2012
  article-title: Early subclinical rejection as a risk factor for late chronic humoral rejection
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 11
  start-page: 698
  year: 2011
  article-title: The histology of solitary renal allografts at 1 and 5 years after transplantation
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 357
  start-page: 2562
  year: 2007
  article-title: Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 364
  start-page: 1369
  year: 2011
  article-title: Kidney allocation and the aging immune response
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 78
  start-page: 242
  year: 2004
  article-title: Natural history, risk factors, and impact of subclinical rejection in kidney transplantation
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 16
  start-page: 2654
  year: 2016
  article-title: Banff borderline changes suspicious for acute T cell‐mediated rejection: where do we stand?
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 5
  start-page: 2363
  year: 2010
  article-title: Posttransplant recurrence of primary glomerulonephritis
  publication-title: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol CJASN
– volume: 7
  start-page: 2538
  year: 2007
  article-title: Lack of benefit of early protocol biopsies in renal transplant patients receiving TAC and MMF: a randomized study
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 92
  start-page: 918
  year: 2011
  article-title: Monitoring nonadherence and acute rejection with variation in blood immunosuppressant levels in pediatric renal transplantation
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 73
  start-page: 1965
  year: 2002
  article-title: Subclinical rejection in tacrolimus‐treated renal transplant recipients
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 23
  start-page: 19
  issue: Suppl 21
  year: 2009
  article-title: Borderline rejection after renal transplantation–to treat or not to treat
  publication-title: Clin Transplant
– volume: 12
  start-page: 191
  year: 2012
  article-title: The nature of biopsies with “borderline rejection” and prospects for eliminating this category
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 37
  start-page: 709
  year: 2005
  article-title: Baseline glomerular sclerosis influences morphological changes, but not level of serum creatinine
  publication-title: Transplant Proc
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2422
  year: 2002
  article-title: Recurrent glomerular disease in transplants
  publication-title: Transplant Proc
– ident: e_1_2_9_34_1
  doi: 10.1111/ajt.14431
– ident: e_1_2_9_8_1
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-200206270-00023
– ident: e_1_2_9_9_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.038
– ident: e_1_2_9_2_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03283.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_4_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1802677
– ident: e_1_2_9_7_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01979.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_22_1
  doi: 10.1111/ajt.13572
– ident: e_1_2_9_30_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0041-1345(02)03162-7
– ident: e_1_2_9_12_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.11.006
– ident: e_1_2_9_28_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01502.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_29_1
  doi: 10.2215/CJN.06720810
– ident: e_1_2_9_13_1
  doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31822dc34f
– ident: e_1_2_9_35_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1103007
– ident: e_1_2_9_37_1
  doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000120370.35927.40
– ident: e_1_2_9_31_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.08.030
– volume: 16
  start-page: 391
  year: 2018
  ident: e_1_2_9_25_1
  article-title: Utility of serial protocol biopsies performed after 1 year in predicting long‐term kidney allograft function according to histologic phenotype
  publication-title: Exp Clin Transplant
– ident: e_1_2_9_6_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02726.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_14_1
  doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000128167.60172.CC
– ident: e_1_2_9_39_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03022.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_21_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03784.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_15_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01895.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_16_1
  doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31823bb647
– ident: e_1_2_9_10_1
  doi: 10.1111/ctr.12945
– ident: e_1_2_9_20_1
  doi: 10.1111/ajt.13784
– ident: e_1_2_9_5_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067411
– ident: e_1_2_9_27_1
  doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000183
– ident: e_1_2_9_19_1
  doi: 10.1111/ajt.14625
– ident: e_1_2_9_33_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03312.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_36_1
  doi: 10.1172/JCI90601
– ident: e_1_2_9_3_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03840.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_38_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508103330601
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1944
  year: 2019
  ident: e_1_2_9_32_1
  article-title: Recurrent and de novo glomerulonephritis after kidney transplantation
  publication-title: Front Immunol
  doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01944
– ident: e_1_2_9_24_1
  doi: 10.1111/ajt.15197
– ident: e_1_2_9_11_1
  doi: 10.1111/ajt.13423
– ident: e_1_2_9_18_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01105.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_26_1
  doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00275
– ident: e_1_2_9_17_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04013.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_23_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0041-1345(99)00355-3
SSID ssj0002850
Score 2.3111608
Snippet Summary The idea of protocol biopsy is to detect subclinical pathologies, including rejection, recurrent disease, or infection for early intervention and...
The idea of protocol biopsy is to detect subclinical pathologies, including rejection, recurrent disease, or infection for early intervention and adjustment of...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 185
SubjectTerms Biopsy
borderline rejection
Early intervention
Graft rejection
Immunosuppressive agents
Kidney transplantation
Kidney transplants
protocol biopsy
Recurrent infection
Rejection
Renal function
subclinical rejection
Survival
Title Two‐year protocol biopsy after kidney transplantation in clinically stable recipients – a retrospective study
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Ftri.13785
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33152140
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2475845834
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2458034530
Volume 34
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dS9xAEB_EB-lL7Zf1qpat9MGXHJfdzSWhTyIVW7APcoIPQtivwOGRnHc55HzyTxD8D_1LnNl8tFqF0reQTNhkZ2b3t7szvwH4alRKGZFxwFOdBuiJLlBODAITGhwOrYtyz7Z__Gt4dCp_nkVnK_CtzYWp-SG6DTfyDD9ek4MrPf_DyavZuB-KOKEEc4rVIkB08ps6iie-Oisu2GUwSGLZsApRFE_35uO56C-A-Riv-gnncB3O20-t40wu-otK9831ExbH__yXN_C6AaJsv7act7Diinewdtwctb-Hy9FVeX9zu0RPYETmUKLFMD0up_Ml84XF2cXYFm7JKk-PPlF1DlPBxgVr0y0nS4bgU08cIw6NKaVeztn9zR1TeKOalW2aJ_Mktx_g9PD76OAoaOozBEZEIgqIGz-1RhhtVW5R58YMcxsS4YvUykhnFaKVJJeKqzBBbIOqN1zhGIlTItdCbMBqURZuE9gwT_OID62OIwRoNkfDSZPQuFhYGWse92Cv1VRmGvJyqqExydpFDHZh5ruwB7ud6LRm7HhOaLtVd9Y47TzjEhdPdI4se_Cle4zuRmcoqnDlgmSiZCBkJAY9-FibSdeKEASGJD7Z88p-uflsdPLDX3z6d9EteMUpnsZv_2zDajVbuB0ERJX-7C3_AUXSCjs
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEB6VIkEvvFsCBRbEoRdH8e46tqVeEFCl0PRQpVIvyNqXpaiRHRJHKJz6E5D4h_0lnVk_oDwkxM2y11p7Z77dbx_zDcBro1KKiIwDnuo0QCS6QDkxCExosDu0Lsq92v74eDg6lR_OorMN2G9jYWp9iG7BjZDh-2sCOC1I_4TyajHthyJOohtwkzJ6k3L-u5Mf4lE88flZccoug0ESy0ZXiM7xdK9eH41-o5jXGasfcg7uwqf2Y-uTJuf9VaX75usvOo7_-zf34E7DRdmb2nnuw4YrHsCtcbPb_hA-T76Ulxff1ggGRnoOJToN09Nyvlwzn1ucnU9t4das8grpM1WHMRVsWrA24nK2Zsg_9cwxktGYU_Tlkl1efGcKb1SLso30ZF7n9hGcHryfvB0FTYqGwIhIRAHJ46fWCKOtyi2a3ZhhbkPSfJFaGemsQsKS5FJxFSZIb9D6hivsJnFU5FqIbdgsysI9BjbM0zziQ6vjCDmazdF30iQ0LhZWxprHPdhrTZWZRr-c0mjMsnYeg02Y-Sbswauu6LwW7fhTod3W3lmD22XGJc6faCtZ9uBl9xgRR9soqnDlispEyUDISAx6sFP7SVeLEMSHJD7Z89b-e_XZ5OTQXzz596Iv4PZoMj7Kjg6PPz6FLU7Ha_xq0C5sVouVe4b8qNLPPQyuAM-JDlc
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9RAFD7UCsWX1rtbq47iQ1-yJHPJBZ_EurRqi5Qt9EEIcwssXZLtbpayfepPEPyH_SWemVy0XkB8C8mESeacb-aby_kOwGstMxcRmQQ0U1mASLSBtCwMdKSxOzRWFF5t__Ao3j_hH07F6Rq86WJhGn2IfsHNIcP31w7gM1P8BPJ6PhlGLEnFLbjN4zBzeRv2jn9oR9HUp2fFGTsPwjThrayQO8bTv3pzMPqNYd4krH7EGW3Bl-5bm4MmZ8NlrYb68hcZx__8mbuw2TJR8rZxnXuwZsv7sHHY7rU_gPPxRXV99XWFUCBOzaFClyFqUs0WK-Izi5OziSntitReH30qmyCmkkxK0sVbTlcE2aeaWuJENGYu9nJBrq--EYk36nnVxXkSr3L7EE5G78fv9oM2QUOgmWAicOL4mdFMKyMLg0bXOi5M5BRfuJKaWyORrqQFl1RGKZIbtL2mEjtJHBOpYuwRrJdVaZ8AiYusEDQ2KhHI0EyBnpOlkbYJMzxRNBnAbmepXLfq5S6JxjTvZjHYhLlvwgG86ovOGsmOPxXa6cydt6hd5JTj7MltJPMBvOwfI97cJoosbbV0ZUQaMi5YOIDHjZv0tTDm2BDHJ7ve2H-vPh8fH_iL7X8v-gI2Pu-N8k8HRx-fwh3qztb4paAdWK_nS_sMyVGtnnsQfAeoxA0G
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%E2%80%90year+protocol+biopsy+after+kidney+transplantation+in+clinically+stable+recipients+%E2%80%93+a+retrospective+study&rft.jtitle=Transplant+international&rft.au=Chen%2C+Chien%E2%80%90Chia&rft.au=Lin%2C+Wei%E2%80%90Chou&rft.au=Lee%2C+Chih%E2%80%90Yuan&rft.au=Yang%2C+Ching%E2%80%90Yao&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.issn=0934-0874&rft.eissn=1432-2277&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Ftri.13785&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_tri_13785
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0934-0874&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0934-0874&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0934-0874&client=summon