Are different markers of endometrial receptivity telling us different things about endometrial function?

• Published in: American journal of reproductive immunology (1989) Vol. 84; no. 6; pp. e13323 - n/a
• Main Authors: Hviid Saxtorph, Malene, Persson, Gry, Hallager, Trine, Birch Petersen, Kathrine, Eriksen, Jens O., Larsen, Lise Grupe, Macklon, Nick, Hviid, Thomas Vauvert F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Denmark Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.12.2020
• Subjects: Biopsy; CD16 antigen; CD163 antigen; CD56 antigen; DNA microarrays; endometrial function; endometrial maturation; endometrial receptivity; Endometrium; Foxp3 protein; Gene expression; Immunohistochemistry; Immunology; luteal phase; Natural killer cells; Progesterone; Transcription; uterine natural killer cells; Uterus; Vagina; endometrial function; uterine natural killer cells; endometrial receptivity; endometrial maturation; luteal phase

Problem To what extent do endocrine, immunological, gene expression and histological markers of endometrial receptivity correlate? Method of study Between November 2017 and September 2019, 121 women referred to a University Hospitals Fertility Clinic consented to inclusion in this cohort study. The...