Pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses in healthy subjects
Summary Background Potassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid‐related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P‐CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have...
Saved in:
Published in | Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics Vol. 52; no. 11-12; pp. 1640 - 1647 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.12.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Summary
Background
Potassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid‐related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P‐CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared.
Aims
To evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses
Methods
A randomised, open‐label, active‐controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori‐negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24‐h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA‐122 (miR‐122) level were also collected.
Results
After a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR‐122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels.
Conclusion
Tegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid-related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P-CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared.BACKGROUNDPotassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid-related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P-CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared.To evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses METHODS: A randomised, open-label, active-controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA-122 (miR-122) level were also collected.AIMSTo evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses METHODS: A randomised, open-label, active-controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA-122 (miR-122) level were also collected.After a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR-122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels.RESULTSAfter a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR-122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels.Tegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated.CONCLUSIONTegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated. Summary Background Potassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid‐related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P‐CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared. Aims To evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses Methods A randomised, open‐label, active‐controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori‐negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24‐h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA‐122 (miR‐122) level were also collected. Results After a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR‐122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels. Conclusion Tegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid-related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P-CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared. To evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses METHODS: A randomised, open-label, active-controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA-122 (miR-122) level were also collected. After a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR-122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels. Tegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated. BackgroundPotassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid‐related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P‐CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared.AimsTo evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral dosesMethodsA randomised, open‐label, active‐controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori‐negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24‐h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA‐122 (miR‐122) level were also collected.ResultsAfter a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR‐122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels.ConclusionTegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated. |
Author | Song, Geun Seog Jang, In‐Jin Nam, Ji Yeon Kim, Bongtae Lee, SeungHwan Ban, Mu Seong Ji, Sang Chun Oh, Jaeseong Yu, Kyung‐Sang Sunwoo, Jung |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jung orcidid: 0000-0001-8801-0323 surname: Sunwoo fullname: Sunwoo, Jung organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital – sequence: 2 givenname: Sang Chun orcidid: 0000-0003-2858-1057 surname: Ji fullname: Ji, Sang Chun organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital – sequence: 3 givenname: Jaeseong orcidid: 0000-0001-6275-8587 surname: Oh fullname: Oh, Jaeseong organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital – sequence: 4 givenname: Mu Seong orcidid: 0000-0001-7140-3032 surname: Ban fullname: Ban, Mu Seong organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital – sequence: 5 givenname: Ji Yeon surname: Nam fullname: Nam, Ji Yeon organization: HK inno.N Corp – sequence: 6 givenname: Bongtae surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Bongtae organization: HK inno.N Corp – sequence: 7 givenname: Geun Seog surname: Song fullname: Song, Geun Seog organization: HK inno.N Corp – sequence: 8 givenname: Kyung‐Sang orcidid: 0000-0003-0921-7225 surname: Yu fullname: Yu, Kyung‐Sang organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital – sequence: 9 givenname: In‐Jin orcidid: 0000-0002-8384-3139 surname: Jang fullname: Jang, In‐Jin organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital – sequence: 10 givenname: SeungHwan orcidid: 0000-0002-1713-9194 surname: Lee fullname: Lee, SeungHwan email: leejh413@snu.ac.kr organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131095$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kU9v3CAQxVGVqtn8OfQLVEi9tAcnDNjs-hhFTVspUnJIz2iMcZYVBhdwqu2nD83uXqKGC8zwe0-jeSfkyAdvCPkI7ALKucQpX4AEDu_IAoRsKs6EPCILxmVb8RWIY3KS0oYxJpeMfyDHQoAA1jYLMtyvMY6oQ7_1OFqdaBhoNo9hivgXPUXf02ie8FAO2USarH905uVvnF22UylCREf7kEyi1tO1QZfXW5rmbmN0Tmfk_YAumfP9fUp-3Xx7uP5R3d59_3l9dVtp0Qio-uXQYr2qead5CxKbnmlT99AK2UEvDa-1GVaw5BygxVZw7DomGig9lE15npIvO98pht-zSVmNNmnjHHoT5qR43ciVFJw1Bf38Ct2EOfoyXaEk1EyWbRXq056au9H0aop2xLhVhw0W4HIH6BhSimZQ2mbMNvgc0ToFTP3LSJWM1EtGRfH1leJg-j927_7HOrN9G1RX9w87xTN2_p_f |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejps_2023_106578 crossref_primary_10_3390_pharmaceutics13060813 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yrtph_2023_105424 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_17406 crossref_primary_10_1111_hel_13151 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_oprd_4c00005 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v28_i28_3608 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0302450 crossref_primary_10_2174_2589977515666230428140741 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16477 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_17444 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbc_2024_107986 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16295 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinthera_2021_01_026 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_025_03127_5 crossref_primary_10_1111_bcp_15784 crossref_primary_10_12793_tcp_2024_32_e9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpba_2023_115323 crossref_primary_10_1002_phar_2899 crossref_primary_10_5009_gnl220457 crossref_primary_10_1111_bcp_15268 crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v12_i19_3890 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_17255 crossref_primary_10_3390_pharmaceutics14061298 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16165 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11894_024_00939_3 crossref_primary_10_1177_26345161231181357 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16140 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2021_754849 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2022_979215 |
Cites_doi | 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.047 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01893.x 10.2217/bmm.12.107 10.1002/cpt.1571 10.1038/ctg.2015.18 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32832c1504 10.1111/apt.15185 10.1124/jpet.108.146415 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06408.x 10.4292/wjgpt.v9.i7.63 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002280 10.1007/s10620-015-4014-0 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.10.022 10.1111/apt.13121 10.1159/000484688 10.5056/jnm18001 10.1007/s10620-017-4866-6 10.1111/apt.14818 10.1159/000200917 10.2133/dmpk.20.153 10.1177/0091270003261321 10.1111/apt.15438 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.1.25 10.3949/ccjm.70.Suppl_5.S4 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03976.x 10.1111/bcp.12095 10.1046/j.1365-2036.17.s1.3.x 10.1248/bpb.25.379 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-2-132 10.5056/jnm18029 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd – notice: 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. – notice: Copyright © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7T5 7TK 7U9 H94 K9. M7N 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/apt.16121 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Immunology Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Immunology Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1365-2036 |
EndPage | 1647 |
ExternalDocumentID | 33131095 10_1111_apt_16121 APT16121 |
Genre | article Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Republic of Korea |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Republic of Korea |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: HK inno.N Corp. |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 23M 24P 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6J9 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAKAS AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABJNI ABOCM ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZCM ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BAWUL BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DC6 DCZOG DIK DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DTERQ E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBC EBD EBS EBX EJD EMB EMK EMOBN EST ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FIJ FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA GX1 H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IPNFZ IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK0 MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D P6G PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 Q~Q R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TR2 TUS UB1 V8K V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WIN WOHZO WOW WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 YOC ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAYXX AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7T5 7TK 7U9 H94 K9. M7N 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-d7f9a4842bc2916a5d0ce4d1936b1d6e24cef81722119a932abb0351f81a65b03 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0269-2813 1365-2036 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 18:29:22 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:10:59 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:51:04 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:22:40 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:57:04 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:33:14 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 11-12 |
Language | English |
License | 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3531-d7f9a4842bc2916a5d0ce4d1936b1d6e24cef81722119a932abb0351f81a65b03 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-8384-3139 0000-0001-6275-8587 0000-0003-0921-7225 0000-0003-2858-1057 0000-0001-7140-3032 0000-0001-8801-0323 0000-0002-1713-9194 |
PMID | 33131095 |
PQID | 2461406067 |
PQPubID | 2045200 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2456863205 proquest_journals_2461406067 pubmed_primary_33131095 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_apt_16121 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16121 wiley_primary_10_1111_apt_16121_APT16121 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | December 2020 2020-12-00 20201201 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2020 text: December 2020 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Chichester |
PublicationTitle | Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Aliment Pharmacol Ther |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | 2004; 44 2009; 25 2015; 6 2019; 50 2012 2004; 6 2005; 20 2020; 107 2018; 63 2003; 17 2017; 153 2013; 7 2007; 34 2018; 48 1992; 51 2009; 29 2018; 24 2013; 19 2018; 9 2002; 25 2010; 25 2003; 70 2004; 19 2013; 76 2017; 17 2019; 68 2015; 41 2019; 49 2017 2016; 61 2018; 93 2009; 328 2018; 97 2012; 5 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_29_1 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_36_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 Ding X (e_1_2_8_33_1) 2012; 5 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_31_1 Tutuian R (e_1_2_8_4_1) 2004; 6 e_1_2_8_11_1 Chang R (e_1_2_8_27_1) 2007; 34 e_1_2_8_34_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 e_1_2_8_30_1 33333599 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(1):192-193 33333612 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(1):190-191 |
References_xml | – volume: 17 start-page: 10 year: 2003 end-page: 15 article-title: Review article: gastric acidity− comparison of esomeprazole with other proton pump inhibitors publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 6 year: 2004 article-title: Nocturnal acid breakthrough–approach to management publication-title: MedGenMed – volume: 97 start-page: 154 year: 2018 end-page: 162 article-title: Hypergastrinemia in long‐term use of proton pump inhibitors publication-title: Digestion – volume: 51 start-page: 59 year: 1992 end-page: 67 article-title: Appropriate acid suppression for the management of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease publication-title: Digestion – volume: 48 start-page: 206 year: 2018 end-page: 218 article-title: Safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DWP 14012, a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 25 start-page: 379 year: 2002 end-page: 382 article-title: Lafutidine changes levels of somatostatin, calcitonin gene‐related peptide, and secretin in human plasma publication-title: Biol Pharm Bull – volume: 5 start-page: 1428 year: 2012 end-page: 1432 article-title: Circulating microRNA‐122 as a potential biomarker for liver injury publication-title: Mol Med Rep – volume: 34 start-page: 312 year: 2007 end-page: 319 article-title: Phase III clinical trial of revaprazan (Revanex $^{(R)} $) for gastric ulcer publication-title: Clin Endosc – volume: 7 start-page: 205 year: 2013 end-page: 210 article-title: Circulating miR‐122 as a potential biomarker of liver disease publication-title: Biomark Med – volume: 9 start-page: 63 year: 2018 end-page: 68 article-title: Potassium‐competitive acid blockers‐are they the next generation of proton pump inhibitors? publication-title: World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther – volume: 44 start-page: 73 year: 2004 end-page: 82 article-title: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of a novel proton pump inhibitor, YH1885, in healthy volunteers publication-title: J Clin Pharmacol – volume: 19 start-page: 655 year: 2004 end-page: 662 article-title: Tenatoprazole, a novel proton pump inhibitor with a prolonged plasma half‐life: effects on intragastric pH and comparison with esomeprazole in healthy volunteers publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 328 start-page: 671 year: 2009 end-page: 679 article-title: N‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐N,2‐dimethyl‐8‐{[(4R)‐5‐methyl‐3,4‐dihydro‐2H‐chromen‐4‐yl]ami no}imidazo[1,2‐a]pyridine‐6‐carboxamide (PF‐03716556), a novel, potent, and selective acid pump antagonist for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease publication-title: J Pharmacol Exp Ther – volume: 107 start-page: 333 year: 2020 end-page: 346 article-title: Next‐generation DILI biomarkers: prioritization of biomarkers for qualification and best practices for biospecimen collection in drug development publication-title: Clin Pharmacol Ther – year: 2012 – volume: 61 start-page: 708 year: 2016 end-page: 712 article-title: Solitary gastric carcinoid tumor associated with long‐term use of omeprazole: a case report and review of the literature publication-title: Dig Dis Sci – volume: 25 start-page: 1618 year: 2010 end-page: 1625 article-title: Clinical trial: inhibitory effect of revaprazan on gastric acid secretion in healthy male subjects publication-title: J Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 17 start-page: 132 year: 2017 end-page: 136 article-title: Proton pump inhibitor failure in gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease: a perspective aided by the Gartner hype cycle publication-title: Clin Med – volume: 19 start-page: 25 issue: 1 year: 2013 end-page: 35 article-title: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the proton pump inhibitors publication-title: J Neurogastroenterol Motil – volume: 76 start-page: 680 year: 2013 end-page: 688 article-title: Effect of repeated doses of netazepide, a gastrin receptor antagonist, omeprazole and placebo on 24 h gastric acidity and gastrin in healthy subjects publication-title: Br J Clin Pharmacol – volume: 70 start-page: S4 year: 2003 end-page: S19 article-title: GERD pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and clinical manifestations publication-title: Cleve Clinic J Med – volume: 68 start-page: 811 year: 2019 end-page: 817 article-title: Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in infants and children: a systematic review publication-title: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr – volume: 6 year: 2015 article-title: Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single rising TAK‐438 (vonoprazan) doses in healthy male Japanese/non‐Japanese subjects publication-title: Clin Transl Gastroenterol – volume: 24 start-page: 182 year: 2018 end-page: 196 article-title: Advantages and disadvantages of long‐term proton pump inhibitor use publication-title: J Neurogastroenterol Motil – volume: 41 start-page: 636 year: 2015 end-page: 648 article-title: Randomised clinical trial: safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of repeated doses of TAK‐438 (vonoprazan), a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 50 start-page: 751 year: 2019 end-page: 759 article-title: Randomised clinical trial: safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single and multiple oral doses of tegoprazan (CJ‐12420), a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 63 start-page: 302 year: 2018 end-page: 311 article-title: Vonoprazan: a novel and potent alternative in the treatment of acid‐related diseases publication-title: Dig Dis Sci – volume: 93 start-page: 240 year: 2018 end-page: 246 article-title: Proton pump inhibitors: review of emerging concerns publication-title: Mayo Clin Proc – volume: 29 start-page: 1055 year: 2009 end-page: 1068 article-title: Review article: strategies to determine whether hypergastrinaemia is due to Zollinger‐Ellison syndrome rather than a more common benign cause publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 25 start-page: 342 year: 2009 end-page: 351 article-title: Evolving issues in the management of reflux disease? publication-title: Curr Opin Gastroenterol – year: 2017 – volume: 49 start-page: 864 year: 2019 end-page: 872 article-title: Randomised phase 3 trial: tegoprazan, a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, vs. esomeprazole in patients with erosive oesophagitis publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 20 start-page: 153 year: 2005 end-page: 167 article-title: Influence of CYP2C19 pharmacogenetic polymorphism on proton pump inhibitor‐based therapies publication-title: Drug Metab Pharmacokinet – volume: 24 start-page: 334 year: 2018 end-page: 344 article-title: Potent potassium‐competitive acid blockers: a new era for the treatment of acid‐related diseases publication-title: J Neurogastroenterol Motil – volume: 153 start-page: 35 year: 2017 end-page: 48 article-title: Complications of proton pump inhibitor therapy publication-title: Gastroenterology – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.047 – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01893.x – ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 doi: 10.2217/bmm.12.107 – volume: 34 start-page: 312 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 article-title: Phase III clinical trial of revaprazan (Revanex $^{(R)} $) for gastric ulcer publication-title: Clin Endosc – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 doi: 10.1002/cpt.1571 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1038/ctg.2015.18 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32832c1504 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1111/apt.15185 – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.146415 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06408.x – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v9.i7.63 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002280 – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-4014-0 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.10.022 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.1111/apt.13121 – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.1159/000484688 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.5056/jnm18001 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4866-6 – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1111/apt.14818 – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1159/000200917 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.2133/dmpk.20.153 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1177/0091270003261321 – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1111/apt.15438 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.1.25 – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.3949/ccjm.70.Suppl_5.S4 – ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03976.x – volume: 6 start-page: 11 year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 article-title: Nocturnal acid breakthrough–approach to management publication-title: MedGenMed – ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 doi: 10.1111/bcp.12095 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.17.s1.3.x – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 doi: 10.1248/bpb.25.379 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-2-132 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.5056/jnm18029 – volume: 5 start-page: 1428 year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 article-title: Circulating microRNA‐122 as a potential biomarker for liver injury publication-title: Mol Med Rep – reference: 33333599 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(1):192-193 – reference: 33333612 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(1):190-191 |
SSID | ssj0006702 |
Score | 2.4833558 |
Snippet | Summary
Background
Potassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid‐related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux... Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid-related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan... BackgroundPotassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid‐related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease.... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1640 |
SubjectTerms | Administration, Oral Adult Benzene Derivatives - administration & dosage Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Drug dosages Gastric juice Gastrin Gastroesophageal reflux Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy Humans Imidazoles - administration & dosage Male MicroRNAs - blood miRNA Oral administration pH effects Pharmacodynamics Pyrimidinones - administration & dosage Republic of Korea Safety Stomach - drug effects Tetrahydroisoquinolines - administration & dosage Young Adult |
Title | Pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses in healthy subjects |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fapt.16121 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131095 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2461406067 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2456863205 |
Volume | 52 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bS-QwFD6IguzLelvX8UZ22QdfOnTaNNPi03gZRHARUfBBKLmCKB2xHUF_veekF1ddQXxLm1OSJuckX5KT7wD80WnoNM7saGl2GHCXJoHKhA0kDxWPbaKcv5V28lccXfDjy-RyBnbbuzA1P0S34UaW4cdrMnCpyn-MXN5V_QHxX-H4S75aBIjOXqijxND7G-ISIwuidBA3rELkxdN9-XouegcwX-NVP-GMF-CqrWrtZ3LTn1aqr5_esDh-8V8W4XsDRNmo1pwlmLHFMsyfNEftK-BOG1JrU8esL9nEscpS1BT5JAsmC8Pu7YNsHynWOKONh1vr81pPRUYUAMxMSluy64LV9y4fWTlVtANU_oCL8eH5_lHQBGUIdIz2GpihyyRPeaR0hNBSJibUlhvEgUINjLAR19alCIuIOk4iOpRK0WklvpMiweQqzBaTwq4BSy2CoWTolA45185kArENN8JwpTPhXA922u7JdcNYToEzbvN25YLtlvt268HvTvSupun4n9Bm28d5Y6llTnx6CGpQX3rwq8tGG6ODE1nYyZRkEpGKOAqTHvysdaMrJY4HRK6KOTu-hz8uPh-dnvvE-udFN-BbRAt87z-zCbPV_dRuIQqq1DbMjfYO9sbbXu2fAXamBEo |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dS9xAEB_UQu1LrVrrVVvX0gdfcuSSzV4CvohWzo8TKSf4UsJ-gig5MTmh_vWd2XyobYXSt012wia7M9nfzs7-BuCrTkOncWZHS7PDgLs0CVQmbCB5qHhsE-X8qbTxmRhd8OPL5HIOdtuzMDU_ROdwI8vw_2sycHJIP7FyeVv1B0SANQ-vKKM3MecffH8kjxJDH3GIi4wsiNJB3PAKURxP9-jz2egPiPkcsfop53AJfrQvW0eaXPdnlerrh994HP_3a97B2waLsr1aeZZhzhYr8Hrc7LavgjtveK1Nnba-ZFPHKkuJU-SDLJgsDLuz97K9pHTjjHwPN9bXtcGKjFgAmJmWtmRXBauPXv5k5UyRE6h8DxeH3yb7o6DJyxDoGE02MEOXSZ7ySOkI0aVMTKgtNwgFhRoYYSOurUsRGRF7nESAKJWiDUu8J0WCxTVYKKaFXQeWWsRDydApHXKunckEwhtuhOFKZ8K5Huy045PrhrSccmfc5O3iBfst9_3Wgy-d6G3N1PE3oc12kPPGWMucKPUQ16DC9GC7q0Yzo70TWdjpjGQSkYo4CpMefKiVo2sljgfEr4o1O36IX24-3zuf-MLHfxfdgsXRZHyanx6dnWzAm4jW-z6cZhMWqruZ_YSgqFKfve7_An4QBvQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dS9xAEB_UgvhS-6U9vbZb6YMvOXLJZi-hT4fXw9oqR1HwoRD2E0old5hcof71zmw-9GwL0rdNdsImuzPZ3-zO_gbgg05Dp3FmR0uzo4C7NAlUJmwgeah4bBPl_Km00zNxfMFPLpPLNfjYnoWp-SG6BTeyDP-_JgNfGHfPyOWiGgyJ_2odnnARZpS3YfLtjjtKjHzAIfoYWRClw7ihFaIwnu7R1cnoD4S5Clj9jDPdhu_tu9aBJj8Hy0oN9M0DGsf__Jhn8LRBomxcq85zWLPFC9g8bfbaX4KbNazWpk5aX7K5Y5WltCnyRhZMFoZd21-yvaRk44xWHq6sr2tDFRlxADAzL23JfhSsPnj5m5VLRUtA5Su4mH46PzoOmqwMgY7RYAMzcpnkKY-UjhBbysSE2nKDQFCooRE24tq6FHERccdJhIdSKdquxHtSJFjcgY1iXtjXwFKLaCgZOaVDzrUzmUBww40wXOlMONeDw3Z4ct1QllPmjKu8dV2w33Lfbz046EQXNU_H34T67RjnjamWORHqIapBfenB-64ajYx2TmRh50uSSUQq4ihMerBb60bXShwPiV0Vaw79CP-7-Xw8O_eFvceLvoPN2WSaf_189mUftiJy9n0sTR82quulfYOIqFJvvebfAmjOBaM |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmacodynamics+of+tegoprazan+and+revaprazan+after+single+and+multiple+oral+doses+in+healthy+subjects&rft.jtitle=Alimentary+pharmacology+%26+therapeutics&rft.au=Sunwoo%2C+Jung&rft.au=Ji%2C+Sang+Chun&rft.au=Oh%2C+Jaeseong&rft.au=Ban%2C+Mu+Seong&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.eissn=1365-2036&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=11-12&rft.spage=1640&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fapt.16121&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F33131095&rft.externalDocID=33131095 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0269-2813&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0269-2813&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0269-2813&client=summon |