Pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses in healthy subjects

Summary Background Potassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid‐related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P‐CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics Vol. 52; no. 11-12; pp. 1640 - 1647
Main Authors Sunwoo, Jung, Ji, Sang Chun, Oh, Jaeseong, Ban, Mu Seong, Nam, Ji Yeon, Kim, Bongtae, Song, Geun Seog, Yu, Kyung‐Sang, Jang, In‐Jin, Lee, SeungHwan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.12.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Summary Background Potassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid‐related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P‐CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared. Aims To evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses Methods A randomised, open‐label, active‐controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori‐negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24‐h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA‐122 (miR‐122) level were also collected. Results After a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR‐122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels. Conclusion Tegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated.
AbstractList Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid-related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P-CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared.BACKGROUNDPotassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid-related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P-CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared.To evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses METHODS: A randomised, open-label, active-controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA-122 (miR-122) level were also collected.AIMSTo evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses METHODS: A randomised, open-label, active-controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA-122 (miR-122) level were also collected.After a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR-122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels.RESULTSAfter a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR-122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels.Tegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated.CONCLUSIONTegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated.
Summary Background Potassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid‐related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P‐CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared. Aims To evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses Methods A randomised, open‐label, active‐controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori‐negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24‐h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA‐122 (miR‐122) level were also collected. Results After a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR‐122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels. Conclusion Tegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated.
Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid-related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P-CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared. To evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses METHODS: A randomised, open-label, active-controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA-122 (miR-122) level were also collected. After a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR-122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels. Tegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated.
BackgroundPotassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid‐related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P‐CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared.AimsTo evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral dosesMethodsA randomised, open‐label, active‐controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori‐negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24‐h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA‐122 (miR‐122) level were also collected.ResultsAfter a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR‐122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels.ConclusionTegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated.
Author Song, Geun Seog
Jang, In‐Jin
Nam, Ji Yeon
Kim, Bongtae
Lee, SeungHwan
Ban, Mu Seong
Ji, Sang Chun
Oh, Jaeseong
Yu, Kyung‐Sang
Sunwoo, Jung
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jung
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8801-0323
  surname: Sunwoo
  fullname: Sunwoo, Jung
  organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Sang Chun
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2858-1057
  surname: Ji
  fullname: Ji, Sang Chun
  organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jaeseong
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6275-8587
  surname: Oh
  fullname: Oh, Jaeseong
  organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Mu Seong
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7140-3032
  surname: Ban
  fullname: Ban, Mu Seong
  organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ji Yeon
  surname: Nam
  fullname: Nam, Ji Yeon
  organization: HK inno.N Corp
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Bongtae
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Bongtae
  organization: HK inno.N Corp
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Geun Seog
  surname: Song
  fullname: Song, Geun Seog
  organization: HK inno.N Corp
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Kyung‐Sang
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0921-7225
  surname: Yu
  fullname: Yu, Kyung‐Sang
  organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital
– sequence: 9
  givenname: In‐Jin
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8384-3139
  surname: Jang
  fullname: Jang, In‐Jin
  organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital
– sequence: 10
  givenname: SeungHwan
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1713-9194
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, SeungHwan
  email: leejh413@snu.ac.kr
  organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131095$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kU9v3CAQxVGVqtn8OfQLVEi9tAcnDNjs-hhFTVspUnJIz2iMcZYVBhdwqu2nD83uXqKGC8zwe0-jeSfkyAdvCPkI7ALKucQpX4AEDu_IAoRsKs6EPCILxmVb8RWIY3KS0oYxJpeMfyDHQoAA1jYLMtyvMY6oQ7_1OFqdaBhoNo9hivgXPUXf02ie8FAO2USarH905uVvnF22UylCREf7kEyi1tO1QZfXW5rmbmN0Tmfk_YAumfP9fUp-3Xx7uP5R3d59_3l9dVtp0Qio-uXQYr2qead5CxKbnmlT99AK2UEvDa-1GVaw5BygxVZw7DomGig9lE15npIvO98pht-zSVmNNmnjHHoT5qR43ciVFJw1Bf38Ct2EOfoyXaEk1EyWbRXq056au9H0aop2xLhVhw0W4HIH6BhSimZQ2mbMNvgc0ToFTP3LSJWM1EtGRfH1leJg-j927_7HOrN9G1RX9w87xTN2_p_f
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejps_2023_106578
crossref_primary_10_3390_pharmaceutics13060813
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yrtph_2023_105424
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_17406
crossref_primary_10_1111_hel_13151
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_oprd_4c00005
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v28_i28_3608
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0302450
crossref_primary_10_2174_2589977515666230428140741
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16477
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_17444
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbc_2024_107986
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16295
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinthera_2021_01_026
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_025_03127_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_bcp_15784
crossref_primary_10_12793_tcp_2024_32_e9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpba_2023_115323
crossref_primary_10_1002_phar_2899
crossref_primary_10_5009_gnl220457
crossref_primary_10_1111_bcp_15268
crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v12_i19_3890
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_17255
crossref_primary_10_3390_pharmaceutics14061298
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16165
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11894_024_00939_3
crossref_primary_10_1177_26345161231181357
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16140
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2021_754849
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2022_979215
Cites_doi 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.047
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01893.x
10.2217/bmm.12.107
10.1002/cpt.1571
10.1038/ctg.2015.18
10.1097/MOG.0b013e32832c1504
10.1111/apt.15185
10.1124/jpet.108.146415
10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06408.x
10.4292/wjgpt.v9.i7.63
10.1097/MPG.0000000000002280
10.1007/s10620-015-4014-0
10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.10.022
10.1111/apt.13121
10.1159/000484688
10.5056/jnm18001
10.1007/s10620-017-4866-6
10.1111/apt.14818
10.1159/000200917
10.2133/dmpk.20.153
10.1177/0091270003261321
10.1111/apt.15438
10.5056/jnm.2013.19.1.25
10.3949/ccjm.70.Suppl_5.S4
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03976.x
10.1111/bcp.12095
10.1046/j.1365-2036.17.s1.3.x
10.1248/bpb.25.379
10.7861/clinmedicine.17-2-132
10.5056/jnm18029
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– notice: 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7T5
7TK
7U9
H94
K9.
M7N
7X8
DOI 10.1111/apt.16121
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Immunology Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Immunology Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1365-2036
EndPage 1647
ExternalDocumentID 33131095
10_1111_apt_16121
APT16121
Genre article
Comparative Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Republic of Korea
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Republic of Korea
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: HK inno.N Corp.
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
23M
24P
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
6J9
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAKAS
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BAWUL
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DC6
DCZOG
DIK
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DTERQ
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBC
EBD
EBS
EBX
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EST
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FIJ
FUBAC
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
GX1
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IPNFZ
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK0
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
P6G
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
Q~Q
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TR2
TUS
UB1
V8K
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YOC
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7T5
7TK
7U9
H94
K9.
M7N
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-d7f9a4842bc2916a5d0ce4d1936b1d6e24cef81722119a932abb0351f81a65b03
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0269-2813
1365-2036
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 18:29:22 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 10:10:59 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:51:04 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:22:40 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:57:04 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:33:14 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11-12
Language English
License 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3531-d7f9a4842bc2916a5d0ce4d1936b1d6e24cef81722119a932abb0351f81a65b03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0002-8384-3139
0000-0001-6275-8587
0000-0003-0921-7225
0000-0003-2858-1057
0000-0001-7140-3032
0000-0001-8801-0323
0000-0002-1713-9194
PMID 33131095
PQID 2461406067
PQPubID 2045200
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2456863205
proquest_journals_2461406067
pubmed_primary_33131095
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_apt_16121
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16121
wiley_primary_10_1111_apt_16121_APT16121
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate December 2020
2020-12-00
20201201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2020
  text: December 2020
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Chichester
PublicationTitle Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics
PublicationTitleAlternate Aliment Pharmacol Ther
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2004; 44
2009; 25
2015; 6
2019; 50
2012
2004; 6
2005; 20
2020; 107
2018; 63
2003; 17
2017; 153
2013; 7
2007; 34
2018; 48
1992; 51
2009; 29
2018; 24
2013; 19
2018; 9
2002; 25
2010; 25
2003; 70
2004; 19
2013; 76
2017; 17
2019; 68
2015; 41
2019; 49
2017
2016; 61
2018; 93
2009; 328
2018; 97
2012; 5
e_1_2_8_28_1
e_1_2_8_29_1
e_1_2_8_24_1
e_1_2_8_25_1
e_1_2_8_26_1
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_20_1
e_1_2_8_21_1
e_1_2_8_22_1
e_1_2_8_23_1
e_1_2_8_17_1
e_1_2_8_18_1
e_1_2_8_19_1
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_36_1
e_1_2_8_14_1
e_1_2_8_35_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_16_1
Ding X (e_1_2_8_33_1) 2012; 5
e_1_2_8_32_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_31_1
Tutuian R (e_1_2_8_4_1) 2004; 6
e_1_2_8_11_1
Chang R (e_1_2_8_27_1) 2007; 34
e_1_2_8_34_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
e_1_2_8_30_1
33333599 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(1):192-193
33333612 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(1):190-191
References_xml – volume: 17
  start-page: 10
  year: 2003
  end-page: 15
  article-title: Review article: gastric acidity− comparison of esomeprazole with other proton pump inhibitors
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 6
  year: 2004
  article-title: Nocturnal acid breakthrough–approach to management
  publication-title: MedGenMed
– volume: 97
  start-page: 154
  year: 2018
  end-page: 162
  article-title: Hypergastrinemia in long‐term use of proton pump inhibitors
  publication-title: Digestion
– volume: 51
  start-page: 59
  year: 1992
  end-page: 67
  article-title: Appropriate acid suppression for the management of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: Digestion
– volume: 48
  start-page: 206
  year: 2018
  end-page: 218
  article-title: Safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DWP 14012, a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 25
  start-page: 379
  year: 2002
  end-page: 382
  article-title: Lafutidine changes levels of somatostatin, calcitonin gene‐related peptide, and secretin in human plasma
  publication-title: Biol Pharm Bull
– volume: 5
  start-page: 1428
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1432
  article-title: Circulating microRNA‐122 as a potential biomarker for liver injury
  publication-title: Mol Med Rep
– volume: 34
  start-page: 312
  year: 2007
  end-page: 319
  article-title: Phase III clinical trial of revaprazan (Revanex $^{(R)} $) for gastric ulcer
  publication-title: Clin Endosc
– volume: 7
  start-page: 205
  year: 2013
  end-page: 210
  article-title: Circulating miR‐122 as a potential biomarker of liver disease
  publication-title: Biomark Med
– volume: 9
  start-page: 63
  year: 2018
  end-page: 68
  article-title: Potassium‐competitive acid blockers‐are they the next generation of proton pump inhibitors?
  publication-title: World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 44
  start-page: 73
  year: 2004
  end-page: 82
  article-title: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of a novel proton pump inhibitor, YH1885, in healthy volunteers
  publication-title: J Clin Pharmacol
– volume: 19
  start-page: 655
  year: 2004
  end-page: 662
  article-title: Tenatoprazole, a novel proton pump inhibitor with a prolonged plasma half‐life: effects on intragastric pH and comparison with esomeprazole in healthy volunteers
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 328
  start-page: 671
  year: 2009
  end-page: 679
  article-title: N‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐N,2‐dimethyl‐8‐{[(4R)‐5‐methyl‐3,4‐dihydro‐2H‐chromen‐4‐yl]ami no}imidazo[1,2‐a]pyridine‐6‐carboxamide (PF‐03716556), a novel, potent, and selective acid pump antagonist for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: J Pharmacol Exp Ther
– volume: 107
  start-page: 333
  year: 2020
  end-page: 346
  article-title: Next‐generation DILI biomarkers: prioritization of biomarkers for qualification and best practices for biospecimen collection in drug development
  publication-title: Clin Pharmacol Ther
– year: 2012
– volume: 61
  start-page: 708
  year: 2016
  end-page: 712
  article-title: Solitary gastric carcinoid tumor associated with long‐term use of omeprazole: a case report and review of the literature
  publication-title: Dig Dis Sci
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1618
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1625
  article-title: Clinical trial: inhibitory effect of revaprazan on gastric acid secretion in healthy male subjects
  publication-title: J Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 17
  start-page: 132
  year: 2017
  end-page: 136
  article-title: Proton pump inhibitor failure in gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease: a perspective aided by the Gartner hype cycle
  publication-title: Clin Med
– volume: 19
  start-page: 25
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 35
  article-title: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the proton pump inhibitors
  publication-title: J Neurogastroenterol Motil
– volume: 76
  start-page: 680
  year: 2013
  end-page: 688
  article-title: Effect of repeated doses of netazepide, a gastrin receptor antagonist, omeprazole and placebo on 24 h gastric acidity and gastrin in healthy subjects
  publication-title: Br J Clin Pharmacol
– volume: 70
  start-page: S4
  year: 2003
  end-page: S19
  article-title: GERD pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and clinical manifestations
  publication-title: Cleve Clinic J Med
– volume: 68
  start-page: 811
  year: 2019
  end-page: 817
  article-title: Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in infants and children: a systematic review
  publication-title: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
– volume: 6
  year: 2015
  article-title: Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single rising TAK‐438 (vonoprazan) doses in healthy male Japanese/non‐Japanese subjects
  publication-title: Clin Transl Gastroenterol
– volume: 24
  start-page: 182
  year: 2018
  end-page: 196
  article-title: Advantages and disadvantages of long‐term proton pump inhibitor use
  publication-title: J Neurogastroenterol Motil
– volume: 41
  start-page: 636
  year: 2015
  end-page: 648
  article-title: Randomised clinical trial: safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of repeated doses of TAK‐438 (vonoprazan), a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 50
  start-page: 751
  year: 2019
  end-page: 759
  article-title: Randomised clinical trial: safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single and multiple oral doses of tegoprazan (CJ‐12420), a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 63
  start-page: 302
  year: 2018
  end-page: 311
  article-title: Vonoprazan: a novel and potent alternative in the treatment of acid‐related diseases
  publication-title: Dig Dis Sci
– volume: 93
  start-page: 240
  year: 2018
  end-page: 246
  article-title: Proton pump inhibitors: review of emerging concerns
  publication-title: Mayo Clin Proc
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1055
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1068
  article-title: Review article: strategies to determine whether hypergastrinaemia is due to Zollinger‐Ellison syndrome rather than a more common benign cause
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 25
  start-page: 342
  year: 2009
  end-page: 351
  article-title: Evolving issues in the management of reflux disease?
  publication-title: Curr Opin Gastroenterol
– year: 2017
– volume: 49
  start-page: 864
  year: 2019
  end-page: 872
  article-title: Randomised phase 3 trial: tegoprazan, a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, vs. esomeprazole in patients with erosive oesophagitis
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 20
  start-page: 153
  year: 2005
  end-page: 167
  article-title: Influence of CYP2C19 pharmacogenetic polymorphism on proton pump inhibitor‐based therapies
  publication-title: Drug Metab Pharmacokinet
– volume: 24
  start-page: 334
  year: 2018
  end-page: 344
  article-title: Potent potassium‐competitive acid blockers: a new era for the treatment of acid‐related diseases
  publication-title: J Neurogastroenterol Motil
– volume: 153
  start-page: 35
  year: 2017
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Complications of proton pump inhibitor therapy
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.047
– ident: e_1_2_8_21_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01893.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_34_1
  doi: 10.2217/bmm.12.107
– volume: 34
  start-page: 312
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_8_27_1
  article-title: Phase III clinical trial of revaprazan (Revanex $^{(R)} $) for gastric ulcer
  publication-title: Clin Endosc
– ident: e_1_2_8_35_1
  doi: 10.1002/cpt.1571
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.1038/ctg.2015.18
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
  doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32832c1504
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1111/apt.15185
– ident: e_1_2_8_25_1
  doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.146415
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06408.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_28_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_36_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v9.i7.63
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002280
– ident: e_1_2_8_32_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-4014-0
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.10.022
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
  doi: 10.1111/apt.13121
– ident: e_1_2_8_23_1
  doi: 10.1159/000484688
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.5056/jnm18001
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4866-6
– ident: e_1_2_8_22_1
  doi: 10.1111/apt.14818
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
  doi: 10.1159/000200917
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.2133/dmpk.20.153
– ident: e_1_2_8_26_1
  doi: 10.1177/0091270003261321
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.1111/apt.15438
– ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
  doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.1.25
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.3949/ccjm.70.Suppl_5.S4
– ident: e_1_2_8_29_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03976.x
– volume: 6
  start-page: 11
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  article-title: Nocturnal acid breakthrough–approach to management
  publication-title: MedGenMed
– ident: e_1_2_8_30_1
  doi: 10.1111/bcp.12095
– ident: e_1_2_8_24_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.17.s1.3.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_31_1
  doi: 10.1248/bpb.25.379
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-2-132
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.5056/jnm18029
– volume: 5
  start-page: 1428
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_8_33_1
  article-title: Circulating microRNA‐122 as a potential biomarker for liver injury
  publication-title: Mol Med Rep
– reference: 33333599 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(1):192-193
– reference: 33333612 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(1):190-191
SSID ssj0006702
Score 2.4833558
Snippet Summary Background Potassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid‐related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux...
Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid-related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan...
BackgroundPotassium‐competitive acid blockers (P‐CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid‐related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease....
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1640
SubjectTerms Administration, Oral
Adult
Benzene Derivatives - administration & dosage
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug dosages
Gastric juice
Gastrin
Gastroesophageal reflux
Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy
Humans
Imidazoles - administration & dosage
Male
MicroRNAs - blood
miRNA
Oral administration
pH effects
Pharmacodynamics
Pyrimidinones - administration & dosage
Republic of Korea
Safety
Stomach - drug effects
Tetrahydroisoquinolines - administration & dosage
Young Adult
Title Pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses in healthy subjects
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fapt.16121
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131095
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2461406067
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2456863205
Volume 52
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bS-QwFD6IguzLelvX8UZ22QdfOnTaNNPi03gZRHARUfBBKLmCKB2xHUF_veekF1ddQXxLm1OSJuckX5KT7wD80WnoNM7saGl2GHCXJoHKhA0kDxWPbaKcv5V28lccXfDjy-RyBnbbuzA1P0S34UaW4cdrMnCpyn-MXN5V_QHxX-H4S75aBIjOXqijxND7G-ISIwuidBA3rELkxdN9-XouegcwX-NVP-GMF-CqrWrtZ3LTn1aqr5_esDh-8V8W4XsDRNmo1pwlmLHFMsyfNEftK-BOG1JrU8esL9nEscpS1BT5JAsmC8Pu7YNsHynWOKONh1vr81pPRUYUAMxMSluy64LV9y4fWTlVtANU_oCL8eH5_lHQBGUIdIz2GpihyyRPeaR0hNBSJibUlhvEgUINjLAR19alCIuIOk4iOpRK0WklvpMiweQqzBaTwq4BSy2CoWTolA45185kArENN8JwpTPhXA922u7JdcNYToEzbvN25YLtlvt268HvTvSupun4n9Bm28d5Y6llTnx6CGpQX3rwq8tGG6ODE1nYyZRkEpGKOAqTHvysdaMrJY4HRK6KOTu-hz8uPh-dnvvE-udFN-BbRAt87z-zCbPV_dRuIQqq1DbMjfYO9sbbXu2fAXamBEo
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dS9xAEB_UQu1LrVrrVVvX0gdfcuSSzV4CvohWzo8TKSf4UsJ-gig5MTmh_vWd2XyobYXSt012wia7M9nfzs7-BuCrTkOncWZHS7PDgLs0CVQmbCB5qHhsE-X8qbTxmRhd8OPL5HIOdtuzMDU_ROdwI8vw_2sycHJIP7FyeVv1B0SANQ-vKKM3MecffH8kjxJDH3GIi4wsiNJB3PAKURxP9-jz2egPiPkcsfop53AJfrQvW0eaXPdnlerrh994HP_3a97B2waLsr1aeZZhzhYr8Hrc7LavgjtveK1Nnba-ZFPHKkuJU-SDLJgsDLuz97K9pHTjjHwPN9bXtcGKjFgAmJmWtmRXBauPXv5k5UyRE6h8DxeH3yb7o6DJyxDoGE02MEOXSZ7ySOkI0aVMTKgtNwgFhRoYYSOurUsRGRF7nESAKJWiDUu8J0WCxTVYKKaFXQeWWsRDydApHXKunckEwhtuhOFKZ8K5Huy045PrhrSccmfc5O3iBfst9_3Wgy-d6G3N1PE3oc12kPPGWMucKPUQ16DC9GC7q0Yzo70TWdjpjGQSkYo4CpMefKiVo2sljgfEr4o1O36IX24-3zuf-MLHfxfdgsXRZHyanx6dnWzAm4jW-z6cZhMWqruZ_YSgqFKfve7_An4QBvQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dS9xAEB_UgvhS-6U9vbZb6YMvOXLJZi-hT4fXw9oqR1HwoRD2E0old5hcof71zmw-9GwL0rdNdsImuzPZ3-zO_gbgg05Dp3FmR0uzo4C7NAlUJmwgeah4bBPl_Km00zNxfMFPLpPLNfjYnoWp-SG6BTeyDP-_JgNfGHfPyOWiGgyJ_2odnnARZpS3YfLtjjtKjHzAIfoYWRClw7ihFaIwnu7R1cnoD4S5Clj9jDPdhu_tu9aBJj8Hy0oN9M0DGsf__Jhn8LRBomxcq85zWLPFC9g8bfbaX4KbNazWpk5aX7K5Y5WltCnyRhZMFoZd21-yvaRk44xWHq6sr2tDFRlxADAzL23JfhSsPnj5m5VLRUtA5Su4mH46PzoOmqwMgY7RYAMzcpnkKY-UjhBbysSE2nKDQFCooRE24tq6FHERccdJhIdSKdquxHtSJFjcgY1iXtjXwFKLaCgZOaVDzrUzmUBww40wXOlMONeDw3Z4ct1QllPmjKu8dV2w33Lfbz046EQXNU_H34T67RjnjamWORHqIapBfenB-64ajYx2TmRh50uSSUQq4ihMerBb60bXShwPiV0Vaw79CP-7-Xw8O_eFvceLvoPN2WSaf_189mUftiJy9n0sTR82quulfYOIqFJvvebfAmjOBaM
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmacodynamics+of+tegoprazan+and+revaprazan+after+single+and+multiple+oral+doses+in+healthy+subjects&rft.jtitle=Alimentary+pharmacology+%26+therapeutics&rft.au=Sunwoo%2C+Jung&rft.au=Ji%2C+Sang+Chun&rft.au=Oh%2C+Jaeseong&rft.au=Ban%2C+Mu+Seong&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.eissn=1365-2036&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=11-12&rft.spage=1640&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fapt.16121&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F33131095&rft.externalDocID=33131095
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0269-2813&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0269-2813&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0269-2813&client=summon