Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Approach in Children Presenting with Urinary Tract Infection: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis Using RIVUR and CUTIE Data

• Published in: The Journal of urology Vol. 206; no. 5; pp. 1284 - 1290
• Main Authors: Scott Wang, Hsin-Hsiao, Cahill, Dylan, Panagides, John, Logvinenko, Tanya, Nelson, Caleb
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Philadelphia, PA Wolters Kluwer 01.11.2021
• Subjects: Child; Child, Preschool; Computer Simulation; Cystography - adverse effects; Cystography - methods; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Kidney - diagnostic imaging; Male; Models, Statistical; Radionuclide Imaging - adverse effects; Radionuclide Imaging - methods; Radiopharmaceuticals - administration & dosage; Recurrence; Technetium Tc 99m Dimercaptosuccinic Acid - administration & dosage; Ultrasonography; Urinary Bladder - diagnostic imaging; Urinary Tract Infections - diagnosis; Urinary Tract Infections - therapy; Urination; vesico-ureteral reflux; technetium Tc 99m dimercaptosuccinic acid; cystography; urinary tract infections
• ISSN: 0022-5347; 1527-3792; 1527-3792
• DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001931

Purpose:The initial imaging approach to children with urinary tract infection (UTI) is controversial. Along with renal/bladder ultrasound, some advocate voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), ie a bottom-up approach, while others advocate dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan, ie a top-down approach. Comparison of these approaches is challenging. In the RIVUR/CUTIE trials, however, all subjects underwent both VCUG and DMSA scan. Our objective was to perform a comparative effectiveness analysis of the bottom-up vs top-down approach.Materials and Methods:We simulated 1,000 hypothetical sets of 500 children using RIVUR/CUTIE data. In the top-down approach, patients underwent initial DMSA scan, and only those with renal scarring underwent VCUG. In the bottom-up approach, the initial study was VCUG. We assumed all children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) received continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP). Outcomes included recurrent UTI, number of VCUGs and CAP exposure. We assumed a 25% VUR prevalence in children with initial UTI with sensitivity analysis using 40% VUR prevalence.Results:Median age of the original RIVUR/CUTIE cohort was 12 months. First DMSA scan was performed at a median of 8.2 weeks (IQR 5-11.8) after the index UTI. In the simulated cohort, slightly higher yet statistically significantly recurrent UTI was associated with the top-down compared with the bottom-up approach (24.4% vs 18.0%, p=0.045). On the other hand, the bottom-up approach resulted in more VCUG (100% vs 2.4%, p <0.001). Top-down resulted in fewer CAP-exposed patients (25% vs 0.4%, p <0.001) and lower overall CAP exposure (5 vs 162 days/person, p <0.001). Sensitivity analysis was performed with 40% VUR prevalence with similar results.Conclusions:The top-down approach was associated with slightly higher recurrent UTI. Compared to the bottom-up approach, it significantly reduced the need for VCUG and CAP.