Pharmacokinetic Comparison Between a Fixed‐Dose Combination of Empagliflozin L‐Proline/Metformin and Empagliflozin/Metformin in Healthy Korean Subjects

Empagliflozin and metformin are oral antidiabetic drugs commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus as a combination therapy. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of a newly developed fixed‐dose combination of 5‐mg empagliflozin L‐proline and 1000‐mg metformin with the ref...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical pharmacology in drug development Vol. 12; no. 12; pp. 1156 - 1163
Main Authors Lee, HyunJoon, Chung, Jae‐Yong, Yu, Kyung‐Sang, Park, Shin‐Jung, Lee, Soyoung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.12.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Empagliflozin and metformin are oral antidiabetic drugs commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus as a combination therapy. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of a newly developed fixed‐dose combination of 5‐mg empagliflozin L‐proline and 1000‐mg metformin with the reference drug. A randomized, open‐label, single‐dose, 2‐period, 2‐treatment, crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean subjects. The subjects received a single oral dose of reference drug or test drug at each period. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental method. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the plasma maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) were calculated. A total of 27 healthy subjects were included in the PK analysis. For empagliflozin, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test to reference drug for Cmax and AUClast were 1.03 (0.99–1.08) and 1.03 (1.00–1.06), respectively. For metformin, the corresponding values for Cmax and AUClast were 0.99 (0.92–1.06) and 1.00 (0.94–1.06), respectively. In conclusion, a fixed‐dose combination of empagliflozin L‐proline and metformin showed similar PK characteristics to the reference drug, and both drugs were safe in healthy subjects.
AbstractList Empagliflozin and metformin are oral antidiabetic drugs commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus as a combination therapy. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of a newly developed fixed‐dose combination of 5‐mg empagliflozin L‐proline and 1000‐mg metformin with the reference drug. A randomized, open‐label, single‐dose, 2‐period, 2‐treatment, crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean subjects. The subjects received a single oral dose of reference drug or test drug at each period. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental method. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the plasma maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) were calculated. A total of 27 healthy subjects were included in the PK analysis. For empagliflozin, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test to reference drug for Cmax and AUClast were 1.03 (0.99–1.08) and 1.03 (1.00–1.06), respectively. For metformin, the corresponding values for Cmax and AUClast were 0.99 (0.92–1.06) and 1.00 (0.94–1.06), respectively. In conclusion, a fixed‐dose combination of empagliflozin L‐proline and metformin showed similar PK characteristics to the reference drug, and both drugs were safe in healthy subjects.
Empagliflozin and metformin are oral antidiabetic drugs commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus as a combination therapy. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of a newly developed fixed-dose combination of 5-mg empagliflozin L-proline and 1000-mg metformin with the reference drug. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period, 2-treatment, crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean subjects. The subjects received a single oral dose of reference drug or test drug at each period. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental method. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the plasma maximum concentration (Cmax ) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast ) were calculated. A total of 27 healthy subjects were included in the PK analysis. For empagliflozin, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test to reference drug for Cmax and AUClast were 1.03 (0.99-1.08) and 1.03 (1.00-1.06), respectively. For metformin, the corresponding values for Cmax and AUClast were 0.99 (0.92-1.06) and 1.00 (0.94-1.06), respectively. In conclusion, a fixed-dose combination of empagliflozin L-proline and metformin showed similar PK characteristics to the reference drug, and both drugs were safe in healthy subjects.Empagliflozin and metformin are oral antidiabetic drugs commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus as a combination therapy. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of a newly developed fixed-dose combination of 5-mg empagliflozin L-proline and 1000-mg metformin with the reference drug. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period, 2-treatment, crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean subjects. The subjects received a single oral dose of reference drug or test drug at each period. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental method. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the plasma maximum concentration (Cmax ) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast ) were calculated. A total of 27 healthy subjects were included in the PK analysis. For empagliflozin, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test to reference drug for Cmax and AUClast were 1.03 (0.99-1.08) and 1.03 (1.00-1.06), respectively. For metformin, the corresponding values for Cmax and AUClast were 0.99 (0.92-1.06) and 1.00 (0.94-1.06), respectively. In conclusion, a fixed-dose combination of empagliflozin L-proline and metformin showed similar PK characteristics to the reference drug, and both drugs were safe in healthy subjects.
Empagliflozin and metformin are oral antidiabetic drugs commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus as a combination therapy. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of a newly developed fixed‐dose combination of 5‐mg empagliflozin L‐proline and 1000‐mg metformin with the reference drug. A randomized, open‐label, single‐dose, 2‐period, 2‐treatment, crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean subjects. The subjects received a single oral dose of reference drug or test drug at each period. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental method. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the plasma maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) were calculated. A total of 27 healthy subjects were included in the PK analysis. For empagliflozin, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test to reference drug for Cmax and AUClast were 1.03 (0.99–1.08) and 1.03 (1.00–1.06), respectively. For metformin, the corresponding values for Cmax and AUClast were 0.99 (0.92–1.06) and 1.00 (0.94–1.06), respectively. In conclusion, a fixed‐dose combination of empagliflozin L‐proline and metformin showed similar PK characteristics to the reference drug, and both drugs were safe in healthy subjects.
Empagliflozin and metformin are oral antidiabetic drugs commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus as a combination therapy. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of a newly developed fixed-dose combination of 5-mg empagliflozin L-proline and 1000-mg metformin with the reference drug. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period, 2-treatment, crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean subjects. The subjects received a single oral dose of reference drug or test drug at each period. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental method. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the plasma maximum concentration (C ) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC ) were calculated. A total of 27 healthy subjects were included in the PK analysis. For empagliflozin, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test to reference drug for C and AUC were 1.03 (0.99-1.08) and 1.03 (1.00-1.06), respectively. For metformin, the corresponding values for C  and AUC were 0.99 (0.92-1.06) and 1.00 (0.94-1.06), respectively. In conclusion, a fixed-dose combination of empagliflozin L-proline and metformin showed similar PK characteristics to the reference drug, and both drugs were safe in healthy subjects.
Empagliflozin and metformin are oral antidiabetic drugs commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus as a combination therapy. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of a newly developed fixed‐dose combination of 5‐mg empagliflozin L‐proline and 1000‐mg metformin with the reference drug. A randomized, open‐label, single‐dose, 2‐period, 2‐treatment, crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean subjects. The subjects received a single oral dose of reference drug or test drug at each period. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental method. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the plasma maximum concentration (C max ) and area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC last ) were calculated. A total of 27 healthy subjects were included in the PK analysis. For empagliflozin, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test to reference drug for C max and AUC last were 1.03 (0.99–1.08) and 1.03 (1.00–1.06), respectively. For metformin, the corresponding values for C max  and AUC last were 0.99 (0.92–1.06) and 1.00 (0.94–1.06), respectively. In conclusion, a fixed‐dose combination of empagliflozin L‐proline and metformin showed similar PK characteristics to the reference drug, and both drugs were safe in healthy subjects.
Author Chung, Jae‐Yong
Lee, Soyoung
Yu, Kyung‐Sang
Lee, HyunJoon
Park, Shin‐Jung
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: HyunJoon
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, HyunJoon
  organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jae‐Yong
  surname: Chung
  fullname: Chung, Jae‐Yong
  organization: Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Kyung‐Sang
  surname: Yu
  fullname: Yu, Kyung‐Sang
  organization: Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Shin‐Jung
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, Shin‐Jung
  organization: Chong Kun Dang Research Institute, Chong Kun Dan Pharmaceutical Corporation
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Soyoung
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Soyoung
  email: sylee0829@snu.ac.kr
  organization: Seoul National University Medical Research Center
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37489552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kc1uEzEUhS1UREvoghdAI7GBRRp7PD_OEpL-iSAiARI7647nDnXw2MH2qIQVj9A9b8eT1GlTBBVYlmzZ3zm2znlM9qyzSMhTRo8YpflErdv2iHFGH5CDnFV0XFeF2Pu955_2yWEIK5pGRRljxSOyz-tCTMsyPyA_lxfge1Dui7YYtcpmrl-D18HZ7DXGS0SbQXaiv2H768fV3AXcEo22EHVCXJcdJ_6z0Z1x37XNFolaemeS2-Qtxs75Pp2Cbf_m_rhL8wzBxItN9sZ5BJu9H5oVqhiekIcdmICHu3VEPp4cf5idjRfvTs9nrxZjxUtOx0IxgVgVwFiOqmpUxZHXvJgi70CwtuF12ylW5yUw0daiFCA6ilBMgRcUGz4iL2591959HTBE2eug0Biw6IYgc1EwIXjKL6HP76ErN3ibfpeoaVnXgqanR-TZjhqaHlu59roHv5F3sSdgcgso70Lw2Eml402i0YM2klG57VZuu5XbbpPi5T3Fnem_2J37pTa4-T8oZ8v5_EZxDfR_tyI
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_ph17040522
Cites_doi 10.1007/s40262-013-0126-x
10.1016/j.xphs.2017.04.078
10.4093/dmj.2020.0254
10.3390/molecules26113279
10.4239/wjd.v5.i4.444
10.1002/advs.202100275
10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00017
10.12793/tcp.2020.28.e4
10.1177/1179551418786258
10.1038/s41433-019-0494-z
10.2337/dc16-0522
10.1007/s00125-017-4343-y
10.1592/phco.31.12.44S
10.1007/s00125-016-4157-3
10.2337/dc21-S009
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
– notice: American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1002/cpdd.1310
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE
CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology
EISSN 2160-7648
EndPage 1163
ExternalDocumentID 37489552
10_1002_cpdd_1310
CPDD1310
Genre article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Republic of Korea
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Republic of Korea
GroupedDBID -MK
05W
0R~
1OC
33P
3SF
52U
52V
53G
8-1
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABJNI
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACRPL
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFWVQ
AHBTC
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZFZN
AZVAB
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BNHUX
BOGZA
BRXPI
C45
DCZOG
DPXWK
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
EBS
EJD
FUBAC
G-S
GODZA
H13
HGLYW
KBYEO
LATKE
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LSO
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
MY~
O66
O9-
OVD
P2W
PQQKQ
R.K
ROL
SUPJJ
TEORI
TUS
WBKPD
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOIKV
WPGGZ
WXSBR
WYJ
ZZTAW
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-8c18ee64a112ec6bc63e37349e3fa81db37dfc1725a18d7858a8f0ea49a340eb3
ISSN 2160-763X
2160-7648
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 11:33:43 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 12 22:22:01 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:59:51 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:07:56 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:19:15 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:20:20 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 12
Keywords pharmacokinetics
metformin
diabetes mellitus
empagliflozin L-proline
fixed-dose combination
Language English
License 2023, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3530-8c18ee64a112ec6bc63e37349e3fa81db37dfc1725a18d7858a8f0ea49a340eb3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
PMID 37489552
PQID 2895778037
PQPubID 2034576
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2841883006
proquest_journals_2895778037
pubmed_primary_37489552
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_cpdd_1310
crossref_primary_10_1002_cpdd_1310
wiley_primary_10_1002_cpdd_1310_CPDD1310
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate December 2023
2023-12-00
20231201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2023
  text: December 2023
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Clinical pharmacology in drug development
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2021; 8
2021; 26
2014; 5
2021; 45
2017; 60
2021; 44
2019; 33
2011; 31
2020; 28
2016; 39
2018; 11
2018; 22
2017; 106
2014; 53
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_14_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_16_1
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_11_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
References_xml – volume: 22
  start-page: 467
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  end-page: 488
  article-title: Synthetic strategies toward SGLT2 inhibitors
  publication-title: Org Process Res Dev
– volume: 5
  start-page: 444
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  end-page: 470
  article-title: Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: have all risk factors the same strength?
  publication-title: World J Diabetes
– volume: 26
  issue: 11
  year: 2021
  article-title: Amino acids as the potential co‐former for co‐crystal development: a review
  publication-title: Molecules
– volume: 28
  start-page: 17
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  end-page: 33
  article-title: Possibility of pharmacokinetic drug interaction between a DPP‐4 inhibitor and a SGLT2 inhibitor
  publication-title: Transl Clin Pharmacol
– volume: 31
  start-page: 44s
  issue: 12
  year: 2011
  end-page: 53s
  article-title: Beyond metformin: initiating combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  publication-title: Pharmacotherapy
– volume: 106
  start-page: 2245
  issue: 9
  year: 2017
  end-page: 2250
  article-title: Transporters involved in metformin pharmacokinetics and treatment response
  publication-title: J Pharm Sci
– volume: 44
  start-page: S111
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  end-page: S124
  article-title: Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes‐2021
  publication-title: Diabetes Care
– volume: 60
  start-page: 215
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  end-page: 225
  article-title: Targeting renal glucose reabsorption to treat hyperglycaemia: the pleiotropic effects of SGLT2 inhibition
  publication-title: Diabetologia
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  end-page: 10
  article-title: Diabetes fact sheets in Korea, 2020: an appraisal of current status
  publication-title: Diabetes Metab J
– volume: 8
  issue: 18
  year: 2021
  article-title: Emerging targets in type 2 diabetes and diabetic complications
  publication-title: Adv Sci (Weinh)
– volume: 53
  start-page: 213
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  end-page: 225
  article-title: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor
  publication-title: Clin Pharmacokinet
– volume: 11
  year: 2018
  article-title: Combination of empagliflozin and metformin therapy: a consideration of its place in type 2 diabetes therapy
  publication-title: Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1842
  issue: 12
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1851
  article-title: New anti‐hyperglycaemic agents for type 2 diabetes and their effects on diabetic retinopathy
  publication-title: Eye
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1718
  issue: 10
  year: 2016
  end-page: 28
  article-title: Initial combination of empagliflozin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes
  publication-title: Diabetes Care
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1561
  issue: 9
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1565
  article-title: 60 years of metformin use: a glance at the past and a look to the future
  publication-title: Diabetologia
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.1007/s40262-013-0126-x
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.04.078
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.4093/dmj.2020.0254
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.3390/molecules26113279
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i4.444
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1002/advs.202100275
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00017
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
  doi: 10.12793/tcp.2020.28.e4
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
  doi: 10.1177/1179551418786258
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0494-z
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
  doi: 10.2337/dc16-0522
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4343-y
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.1592/phco.31.12.44S
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4157-3
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.2337/dc21-S009
SSID ssj0000601114
Score 2.269942
Snippet Empagliflozin and metformin are oral antidiabetic drugs commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus as a combination therapy. This study aimed to compare...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1156
SubjectTerms Antidiabetics
Area Under Curve
Cross-Over Studies
diabetes mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy
Drug Combinations
Drug dosages
empagliflozin L‐proline
fixed‐dose combination
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
metformin
Metformin - pharmacokinetics
Pharmacokinetics
Republic of Korea
Title Pharmacokinetic Comparison Between a Fixed‐Dose Combination of Empagliflozin L‐Proline/Metformin and Empagliflozin/Metformin in Healthy Korean Subjects
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fcpdd.1310
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37489552
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2895778037
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2841883006
Volume 12
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9swFBZp-rKXsfuydUMbowxSt7bk62OTNIRsHYGm0D0Z2ZbbsGCHXGDp037C3vfv9kt2JMuyvbbQDYIJ0okvnC9H35GPPiH0IYC467LYNBKLE8MmZmxEQGMN24m5S3xgCExMDZx-cUfn9vjCuWjttGpVS5t1dBhf37qu5H-8Cm3gV7FK9h88q08KDfAd_AtH8DAc7-XjidKd_gZUUQiv9qtNBXuq_op1h7PvPNE1DQNRnw52kBBrsngCv7qcz9J5fj3LulX9w0Tu6MPh_k75WpDbWVG53LBv9ErhLFFQtu1-ypdikh8Ck5jpWdVJcL9cjbmodLPl8sNkubksl3HVK3JUtdBou8nGeVU30L9SkWrMuL7pr7kai-VuYzKObYVZ2X_Gqv6JKhQ_u4LnKA3GG2Wg5kIIrdWVyJBJLNc0IGJeFKNbva3Q89Qxn9SxTWoRHBiyW2MDllXE3xsjTaFcGy-S5NCiqjK3oeatjZw7zSSN6E8GA9G1g3YJpDqkjXaPe4PeUM8UCsUcS4rU68crJbJMcqRP3SRWN7KlZvIl2dP0EXqo0h58XGD4MWrx7AnaV_jdHuBptQxwdYD38aSGjKfo119AxxXQsQI6ZlgC_fePnwLiuAZxnKe4AVn8GawUuI80eDFAu2lX64OPAjYugI1LYD9D58OTaX9kqF1FjJg61DT82PI5d20GmQaP3Sh2KacetQNOUwbZW0S9JI2B1zvM8hPPd3zmpyZndsCobfKIPkftLM_4S4QZJwGBFghsjk1TiwHX5il3eRI4bmR5HfSxdEkYK8l9sfPLPCzEwkkovBcK73XQe226KHRmbjPaK_0aqjC0CokfOJ7nmxQu9053wyAh3vyxjOcbYWNbvk8BSh30osCDvorUn3IcAjcrAXL35cMSqq_ub_oaPaj-qHuovV5u-Bug8evorcL5H10K8yM
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmacokinetic+Comparison+Between+a+Fixed%E2%80%90Dose+Combination+of+Empagliflozin+L%E2%80%90Proline%2FMetformin+and+Empagliflozin%2FMetformin+in+Healthy+Korean+Subjects&rft.jtitle=Clinical+pharmacology+in+drug+development&rft.au=Lee%2C+HyunJoon&rft.au=Chung%2C+Jae%E2%80%90Yong&rft.au=Yu%2C+Kyung%E2%80%90Sang&rft.au=Park%2C+Shin%E2%80%90Jung&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.issn=2160-763X&rft.eissn=2160-7648&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1156&rft.epage=1163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fcpdd.1310&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fcpdd.1310&rft.externalDocID=CPDD1310
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2160-763X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2160-763X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2160-763X&client=summon