Degradation Model of Self-Heating Effects in Silicon-on-Glass TFTs

This paper investigates the origin and reduction of self-heating effects in single-crystal silicon-on-glass (SiOG) thin-film transistors (TFTs). A hump forms in the transfer characteristics of p-channel SiOG TFTs when the temperature of the devices is increased either by direct heating or electrical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on electron devices Vol. 58; no. 8; pp. 2440 - 2447
Main Authors Mativenga, M., Min Hyuk Choi, Jin Jang, Mruthyunjaya, R., Tredwell, T. J., Mozdy, E., Kosik-Williams, C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY IEEE 01.08.2011
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper investigates the origin and reduction of self-heating effects in single-crystal silicon-on-glass (SiOG) thin-film transistors (TFTs). A hump forms in the transfer characteristics of p-channel SiOG TFTs when the temperature of the devices is increased either by direct heating or electrical biasing. The size of the hump proportionally scales with the channel width W , indicating that it is related to the bulk active-layer properties such as conduction through a backchannel. While the hump increases in the positive direction, the main transistor shifts in the negative direction with increasing self-heating stress time, supporting the exclusion of edge effects. The time dependence of the hump shift is well described by the stretched-exponential behavior, indicating that the backchannel is a result of electron trapping into the silica layer that is between the glass and silicon active layer. To mitigate this hump effect, we demonstrate in this paper that TFTs with an active layer divided into smaller parts along the W direction (in order to increase heat dissipation) show better stability to self-heating stress (i.e., no hump formation) than TFTs with full active layers. Split devices have more channel edges, compared with those with a full active layer, supporting the idea that the hump is indeed not due to edge effects.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0018-9383
1557-9646
DOI:10.1109/TED.2011.2155068