Comparison of Parameterisation Models for the Estimation of the Maximum Power Output of PV Modules

In this paper five heuristic models for the estimation of the maximum power output of photovoltaic (PV) modules with different numbers of parameters (one/two/three/four) using irradiance and PV module temperature as inputs are presented. To validate the performance of the presented models, logged da...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnergy procedia Vol. 25; pp. 101 - 107
Main Authors Ding, Kun, Ye, Zhen, Reindl, Thomas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 2012
Subjects
maximum power
parameterisation model
Photovoltaic module
Photovoltaic module
parameterisation model
maximum power
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1876-6102
1876-6102
DOI10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014

Cover

Abstract In this paper five heuristic models for the estimation of the maximum power output of photovoltaic (PV) modules with different numbers of parameters (one/two/three/four) using irradiance and PV module temperature as inputs are presented. To validate the performance of the presented models, logged data of mono-crystalline and HIT modules from high-precision outdoor module performance testing in Singapore are used. Results show that the one- and twoparameter models have disadvantages at low irradiances. Two different types of three-parameter models show as good results as the four-parameter model and hence seem to be a good compromise between model complexity and accuracy.
AbstractList In this paper five heuristic models for the estimation of the maximum power output of photovoltaic (PV) modules with different numbers of parameters (one/two/three/four) using irradiance and PV module temperature as inputs are presented. To validate the performance of the presented models, logged data of mono-crystalline and HIT modules from high-precision outdoor module performance testing in Singapore are used. Results show that the one- and twoparameter models have disadvantages at low irradiances. Two different types of three-parameter models show as good results as the four-parameter model and hence seem to be a good compromise between model complexity and accuracy.
Author Reindl, Thomas
Ding, Kun
Ye, Zhen
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kun
  surname: Ding
  fullname: Ding, Kun
  organization: Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 7 Engineering Drice 1, Block E3A, Singapore 117574, Singapore
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Zhen
  surname: Ye
  fullname: Ye, Zhen
  email: zhen.ye@nus.edu.sg
  organization: Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 7 Engineering Drice 1, Block E3A, Singapore 117574, Singapore
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Thomas
  surname: Reindl
  fullname: Reindl, Thomas
  organization: Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 7 Engineering Drice 1, Block E3A, Singapore 117574, Singapore
BookMark eNqFkMtOwzAQRS1UJNrCH7DIDySM8w4LJFSVh9SqXQBby3XG4CqJI9sB-vckDQvEAla27sy5ss-MTBrdICGXFAIKNL3aB_h6aI0OQqBhAFkAND4hU5pnqZ9SCCc_7mdkZu0eIAPI4ynZLXTdcqOsbjwtvS03vEaHfcCd6rO1LrGyntTGc2_oLa1T9Tjpt4dkzT9V3dXeVn-g8Tadazt3bHoZ2K5Ce05OJa8sXnyfc_J8t3xaPPirzf3j4nbliygJnR8DhEWaRTykGPEk4kKkSClNSypkDmmYCUkFyCKOS5kUPMci38ldnHKa0BwhmpPrsVcYba1ByYRyx7c6w1XFKLDBFtuz0RYbbDHIWG-rh-NfcGv6n5rDf9jNiPWS8F2hYVYobASWyqBwrNTq74IvQnCJyw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_en11051143
crossref_primary_10_1002_er_8584
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_renene_2024_119943
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2016_01_087
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_solener_2014_12_029
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_matpr_2019_07_704
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apenergy_2025_125310
crossref_primary_10_3103_S0003701X23602028
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_solener_2017_04_047
crossref_primary_10_48084_etasr_612
Cites_doi 10.1109/PVSC.2008.4922586
10.1016/j.solener.2005.06.010
10.1016/j.renene.2008.06.010
10.2499/9780896297890
10.1016/j.solmat.2008.11.055
10.1002/pip.551
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2012
Copyright_xml – notice: 2012
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Economics
Engineering
EISSN 1876-6102
EndPage 107
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_egypro_2012_07_014
S1876610212011769
GroupedDBID --K
0R~
0SF
1B1
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
5VS
6I.
7-5
71M
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAFWJ
AAIKJ
AALRI
AAQFI
AAXUO
ABMAC
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADVLN
AEXQZ
AFTJW
AGHFR
AGUBO
AITUG
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EP2
EP3
FDB
FEDTE
FIRID
FNPLU
HVGLF
HZ~
IXB
KQ8
M41
NCXOZ
O-L
O9-
OK1
OKI
OZT
RIG
ROL
SES
SSZ
TR2
XH2
~S-
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABWVN
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEUPX
AFPUW
AIGII
AKBMS
AKYEP
CITATION
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-40029673a21e3a53acc6e1116d1cf80627cf1c0f944df59a8e98bfb46a1518e03
IEDL.DBID IXB
ISSN 1876-6102
IngestDate Tue Jul 01 04:21:50 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:57:57 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 16 04:30:26 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Photovoltaic module
parameterisation model
maximum power
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0
https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c352t-40029673a21e3a53acc6e1116d1cf80627cf1c0f944df59a8e98bfb46a1518e03
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610212011769
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_egypro_2012_07_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_egypro_2012_07_014
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_egypro_2012_07_014
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012
2012-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2012
  text: 2012
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Energy procedia
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References 78-88.
Tsuno Y, Hishikawa Y, Kurokawa K. Modeling of the I–V curves of the PV modules using linear interpolation/extrapolation.
1070-3.
Marion B. Comparison of predictive models for photovoltaic module performance.
Almonacid F, Rus C, Hontoria L, Fuentes M, Nofuentes G. Characterisation of Si-crystalline PV modules by artificial neural networks.
De Soto W, Klein SA, Beckman WA. Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance.
,
King DK, Kratochvil JA, Boyson WE, Bower W. Field experience with a new performance characterization procedure for photovoltaic arrays.
2008, p. 1-6.
1998, p. 1947-52.
2009
Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore (SERIS) Annual report 2010. April 2011.
2006
593-607.
2004
941-9.
Marion B, Rummel S, Anderberg A. Current–voltage curve translation by bilinear interpolation.
10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0005
10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0025
10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0015
10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0035
10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0010
10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0030
10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0020
References_xml – reference: De Soto W, Klein SA, Beckman WA. Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance.
– reference: Tsuno Y, Hishikawa Y, Kurokawa K. Modeling of the I–V curves of the PV modules using linear interpolation/extrapolation.
– reference: 1998, p. 1947-52.
– reference: 2009;
– reference: : 1070-3.
– reference: 2008, p. 1-6.
– reference: ,
– reference: Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore (SERIS) Annual report 2010. April 2011.
– reference: :78-88.
– reference: Almonacid F, Rus C, Hontoria L, Fuentes M, Nofuentes G. Characterisation of Si-crystalline PV modules by artificial neural networks.
– reference: : 593-607.
– reference: Marion B, Rummel S, Anderberg A. Current–voltage curve translation by bilinear interpolation.
– reference: 2004;
– reference: : 941-9.
– reference: 2006;
– reference: King DK, Kratochvil JA, Boyson WE, Bower W. Field experience with a new performance characterization procedure for photovoltaic arrays.
– reference: Marion B. Comparison of predictive models for photovoltaic module performance.
– ident: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0025
  doi: 10.1109/PVSC.2008.4922586
– ident: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0005
  doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2005.06.010
– ident: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0020
  doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.06.010
– ident: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0035
  doi: 10.2499/9780896297890
– ident: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0010
  doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.11.055
– ident: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0015
  doi: 10.1002/pip.551
– ident: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014_bib0030
SSID ssj0070084
Score 1.971945
Snippet In this paper five heuristic models for the estimation of the maximum power output of photovoltaic (PV) modules with different numbers of parameters...
SourceID crossref
elsevier
SourceType Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 101
SubjectTerms maximum power
parameterisation model
Photovoltaic module
Title Comparison of Parameterisation Models for the Estimation of the Maximum Power Output of PV Modules
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.014
Volume 25
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LSwMxEA6lF_UgWhVbH-Tgde0-ssnmqKWlCNWCVnoLSTaBSl-0u-DPN7OPUkEUPG6YWZbZzMyXMN8MQndKaSOtc0DNtPSItNxTiSEeiwgNuYP4ygfu8OiZDifkaRpPG6hXc2GgrLKK_WVML6J1tdKtrNldz2bd18A5MoXJ1JDDGAUSH7BKgcQ3fayjMYOG8XDocsIeSNf0uaLGC0Z9bYACCDeC7N4PyM_paS_lDE7QcYUV8UP5OaeoYZYtdFBTibctdLTXTfAMqd5upiBeWTyWUHdVtGIurI9h7Nl8ix1KxQ714b5z7pK3CNKwMpKfs0W-wGOYnIZf8mydZ8Wb3kE3n5vtOZoM-m-9oVeNUPC0Q1aZOx36IacskmFgIhlHUmtqXHijaaBtAi2KtQ20bzkhqY25TAxPlFWESocEEuNHF6i5XC3NJcJBLKVJwojT1BB3rlSB9XlKiJJpyLUkbRTVlhO66i8OYy7moi4k-xClvQXYW_hMOHu3kbfTWpf9Nf6QZ_VPEd_2iXAp4FfNzr81r9AhPJUXL9eomW1yc-OgSKZui732Beot3dw
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LSwMxEB60HtSD-MS3OXhdu480uzlqqVRtq-CD3kKSTaDSF3YX_Plm9iEKouA1O7Mss5mZL2HmG4BzpbSR1jmgjrX0qLTcU4mhXhxRFnIH8ZWPvcP9Aes-09tha7gE7boXBssqq9hfxvQiWlcrzcqazflo1HwMnCMznEyNOSxmfBlWHBpgSKB_M7yqw3GMjPF46nLSHorX_XNFkRfO-nrDHkC8Eowv_ID-nJ--5JzrTdiowCK5LL9nC5bMdBtW617ixTasf6ET3AHV_hwqSGaWPEgsvCq4mAvzE5x7Nl4QB1OJg32k47y7bFxEaVzpy_fRJJ-QBxydRu7zbJ5nxZteUDcfm8UuPF93ntpdr5qh4GkHrTJ3PPRDzuJIhoGJZCuSWjPj4htLA20T5CjWNtC-5ZSmtsVlYniirKJMOiiQGD_ag8Z0NjX7QIKWlCYJI85SQ93BUgXW5ymlSqYh15IeQFRbTuiKYBznXIxFXUn2Kkp7C7S38GPh7H0A3qfWvCTY-EM-rn-K-LZRhMsBv2oe_lvzDFa7T_2e6N0M7o5gDZ-UtzDH0MjecnPicEmmTot99wEngeEA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Parameterisation+Models+for+the+Estimation+of+the+Maximum+Power+Output+of+PV+Modules&rft.jtitle=Energy+procedia&rft.au=Ding%2C+Kun&rft.au=Ye%2C+Zhen&rft.au=Reindl%2C+Thomas&rft.date=2012&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=1876-6102&rft.eissn=1876-6102&rft.volume=25&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.egypro.2012.07.014&rft.externalDocID=S1876610212011769
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1876-6102&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1876-6102&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1876-6102&client=summon