Analysis of the process of technology transfer in public research institutions: The Embrapa agrobiology case

Purpose - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), owned by the Brazilian Government, is one of the most efficient agencies for promoting sustainable tropical agriculture in the world. However, although information is available, farmers...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInnovation & management review Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 375 - 390
Main Authors da Silva, Sheila Serafim, Feldmann, Paulo Roberto, Spers, Renata Giovinazzo, Bambini, Martha Delphino
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bingley Emerald 20.11.2019
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), owned by the Brazilian Government, is one of the most efficient agencies for promoting sustainable tropical agriculture in the world. However, although information is available, farmers do not always put the technologies and knowledge into practice. There is a large difference between the average productivity of farmers and crop or herd potential. Thus, this paper aims to describe and analyze the process of technology transfer of the Embrapa Agrobiology Unit. Design/methodology/approach The study reviewed the classical and diffusionist models of technology transfer (TT) in Brazilian agriculture and the role of the government in innovation. This was based on documentary research and structured interviews with four employees, supported by a structured roadmap composed of four categories for analysis: the role of TT; the organizational structure of the area; the TT strategies; and the ways of delivery, methods and tools of TT. By a qualitative approach, the results were treated through content analysis. Findings The results indicated that the area of TT at Embrapa went through a recent restructuring, which included the interchange and collective construction of knowledge (ICC) in its TT process, to turn entrepreneurship into reality. The company is dedicated to bringing knowledge to the most important people: farmers. This has been done through a participatory TT model, which has involved multiplier agents from the research stage to the transfer stage. Research limitations/implications Some limitations were found, among them, the fact that only internal members of Embrapa were interviewed, limiting the view of the TTICC staff and without knowing the multiplier agents' opinion and other actors involved in the process. In addition, it is a qualitative research that is subject to the interpretation of the researcher. Practical implications This study contributed to reflections about the TT process and how it can be used by different actors, along with the role of the State in innovation. Social implications In addition to contributing to the development of products, processes and technologies for the economic, social and environmental development of Brazil, Embrapa has been outstanding in generating knowledge for the advancement of science. Its results have had impacts not only nationally but also worldwide. Embrapa has played a key role in Brazilian agriculture as well as in livestock, mainly, in supporting governmental projects and in the implementation of public policies. Originality/value The aim of this study was achieved, as there was a possibility of describing and analyzing the technology transfer process at Embrapa Agrobiology Unit, located in the city of Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro. It is concluded that Embrapa has been committed to involving the farmer in the process of interchange, collective construction of knowledge and technology transfer. The farmer has become the focus of this process, reducing the development of "shelf" researches and increasing the participation of the farmer or of the multiplier agent. The importance of studying and knowing the process of technology and knowledge transfer to the public of interest should be highlighted, and especially the reasons why this technology or knowledge are often not adopted by the public. It was possible to identify that Embrapa has noticed the difficulties of farmers and realized that the best way the best way of transforming technological solutions and knowledge into innovation is by involving the farmer in the process of construction and of transfer. Thus, the farmer gives greater credibility to the technology or generated knowledge because this is something that he himself helped build. In the sphere of contemporary institutional knowledge management, Embrapa has had as its main point of departure the demand and the needs of society. For this, it has created means to ensure the participation of different actors because they signal the construction of technological solutions and of innovation and they are the ones who know the real situation. However, this is a recent progress within Embrapa that has evolved and generated results. Thus, research, science and technology institutions must go beyond technology transfer and must ensure the involvement, participation and interaction of the public of interest to promote significant change, social, economic and environmental development and transformation. Embrapa observed this from the referential framework that included technology transfer, interchange and the collective construction of knowledge.
AbstractList PurposeEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), owned by the Brazilian Government, is one of the most efficient agencies for promoting sustainable tropical agriculture in the world. However, although information is available, farmers do not always put the technologies and knowledge into practice. There is a large difference between the average productivity of farmers and crop or herd potential. Thus, this paper aims to describe and analyze the process of technology transfer of the Embrapa Agrobiology Unit.Design/methodology/approachThe study reviewed the classical and diffusionist models of technology transfer (TT) in Brazilian agriculture and the role of the government in innovation. This was based on documentary research and structured interviews with four employees, supported by a structured roadmap composed of four categories for analysis: the role of TT; the organizational structure of the area; the TT strategies; and the ways of delivery, methods and tools of TT. By a qualitative approach, the results were treated through content analysis.FindingsThe results indicated that the area of TT at Embrapa went through a recent restructuring, which included the interchange and collective construction of knowledge (ICC) in its TT process, to turn entrepreneurship into reality. The company is dedicated to bringing knowledge to the most important people: farmers. This has been done through a participatory TT model, which has involved multiplier agents from the research stage to the transfer stage.Research limitations/implicationsSome limitations were found, among them, the fact that only internal members of Embrapa were interviewed, limiting the view of the TTICC staff and without knowing the multiplier agents’ opinion and other actors involved in the process. In addition, it is a qualitative research that is subject to the interpretation of the researcher.Practical implicationsThis study contributed to reflections about the TT process and how it can be used by different actors, along with the role of the State in innovation.Social implicationsIn addition to contributing to the development of products, processes and technologies for the economic, social and environmental development of Brazil, Embrapa has been outstanding in generating knowledge for the advancement of science. Its results have had impacts not only nationally but also worldwide. Embrapa has played a key role in Brazilian agriculture as well as in livestock, mainly, in supporting governmental projects and in the implementation of public policies.Originality/valueThe aim of this study was achieved, as there was a possibility of describing and analyzing the technology transfer process at Embrapa Agrobiology Unit, located in the city of Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro. It is concluded that Embrapa has been committed to involving the farmer in the process of interchange, collective construction of knowledge and technology transfer. The farmer has become the focus of this process, reducing the development of “shelf” researches and increasing the participation of the farmer or of the multiplier agent. The importance of studying and knowing the process of technology and knowledge transfer to the public of interest should be highlighted, and especially the reasons why this technology or knowledge are often not adopted by the public. It was possible to identify that Embrapa has noticed the difficulties of farmers and realized that the best way the best way of transforming technological solutions and knowledge into innovation is by involving the farmer in the process of construction and of transfer. Thus, the farmer gives greater credibility to the technology or generated knowledge because this is something that he himself helped build. In the sphere of contemporary institutional knowledge management, Embrapa has had as its main point of departure the demand and the needs of society. For this, it has created means to ensure the participation of different actors because they signal the construction of technological solutions and of innovation and they are the ones who know the real situation. However, this is a recent progress within Embrapa that has evolved and generated results. Thus, research, science and technology institutions must go beyond technology transfer and must ensure the involvement, participation and interaction of the public of interest to promote significant change, social, economic and environmental development and transformation. Embrapa observed this from the referential framework that included technology transfer, interchange and the collective construction of knowledge.
Purpose - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), owned by the Brazilian Government, is one of the most efficient agencies for promoting sustainable tropical agriculture in the world. However, although information is available, farmers do not always put the technologies and knowledge into practice. There is a large difference between the average productivity of farmers and crop or herd potential. Thus, this paper aims to describe and analyze the process of technology transfer of the Embrapa Agrobiology Unit. Design/methodology/approach The study reviewed the classical and diffusionist models of technology transfer (TT) in Brazilian agriculture and the role of the government in innovation. This was based on documentary research and structured interviews with four employees, supported by a structured roadmap composed of four categories for analysis: the role of TT; the organizational structure of the area; the TT strategies; and the ways of delivery, methods and tools of TT. By a qualitative approach, the results were treated through content analysis. Findings The results indicated that the area of TT at Embrapa went through a recent restructuring, which included the interchange and collective construction of knowledge (ICC) in its TT process, to turn entrepreneurship into reality. The company is dedicated to bringing knowledge to the most important people: farmers. This has been done through a participatory TT model, which has involved multiplier agents from the research stage to the transfer stage. Research limitations/implications Some limitations were found, among them, the fact that only internal members of Embrapa were interviewed, limiting the view of the TTICC staff and without knowing the multiplier agents' opinion and other actors involved in the process. In addition, it is a qualitative research that is subject to the interpretation of the researcher. Practical implications This study contributed to reflections about the TT process and how it can be used by different actors, along with the role of the State in innovation. Social implications In addition to contributing to the development of products, processes and technologies for the economic, social and environmental development of Brazil, Embrapa has been outstanding in generating knowledge for the advancement of science. Its results have had impacts not only nationally but also worldwide. Embrapa has played a key role in Brazilian agriculture as well as in livestock, mainly, in supporting governmental projects and in the implementation of public policies. Originality/value The aim of this study was achieved, as there was a possibility of describing and analyzing the technology transfer process at Embrapa Agrobiology Unit, located in the city of Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro. It is concluded that Embrapa has been committed to involving the farmer in the process of interchange, collective construction of knowledge and technology transfer. The farmer has become the focus of this process, reducing the development of "shelf" researches and increasing the participation of the farmer or of the multiplier agent. The importance of studying and knowing the process of technology and knowledge transfer to the public of interest should be highlighted, and especially the reasons why this technology or knowledge are often not adopted by the public. It was possible to identify that Embrapa has noticed the difficulties of farmers and realized that the best way the best way of transforming technological solutions and knowledge into innovation is by involving the farmer in the process of construction and of transfer. Thus, the farmer gives greater credibility to the technology or generated knowledge because this is something that he himself helped build. In the sphere of contemporary institutional knowledge management, Embrapa has had as its main point of departure the demand and the needs of society. For this, it has created means to ensure the participation of different actors because they signal the construction of technological solutions and of innovation and they are the ones who know the real situation. However, this is a recent progress within Embrapa that has evolved and generated results. Thus, research, science and technology institutions must go beyond technology transfer and must ensure the involvement, participation and interaction of the public of interest to promote significant change, social, economic and environmental development and transformation. Embrapa observed this from the referential framework that included technology transfer, interchange and the collective construction of knowledge.
Author da Silva, Sheila Serafim
Feldmann, Paulo Roberto
Bambini, Martha Delphino
Spers, Renata Giovinazzo
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sheila Serafim
  surname: da Silva
  fullname: da Silva, Sheila Serafim
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Paulo Roberto
  surname: Feldmann
  fullname: Feldmann, Paulo Roberto
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Renata Giovinazzo
  surname: Spers
  fullname: Spers, Renata Giovinazzo
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Martha Delphino
  surname: Bambini
  fullname: Bambini, Martha Delphino
BookMark eNp9kEtLxDAUhYOMoI7-ABdCwHU1SZu0dTeIjwEfILoOaXozE-k0Y25mMf_elroQF67ug3MOnO-EzPrQAyHnnF1xzqrr5cvzW8ZkJhivMsZEcUCOheQyq2rFZ7_2I3KG-MkGSanqQhXHpFv0ptujRxocTWug2xgs4HSCXfehC6s9TdH06CBS39Ptrum8pREQTLTr4YXJp13yoccb-j5k3G2aaLaGmlUMjZ8SrEE4JYfOdAhnP3NOPu7v3m8fs6fXh-Xt4imzuRQpE60QFW9d2yrgUNelZI2S0tjctEpWZQG5EcLUThWsFa1xlQXlnGxFw6SqIJ-Tyyl3KPO1A0z6M-ziUBS1kExVpSzyfFDxSWVjQIzg9Db6jYl7zZkeueqRq2ZSj1z1yHXwlH881iczVh8I-e5f58XkBBt6j3ocmELUIueKl_k3lSCKcg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10961_024_10175_6
crossref_primary_10_30525_2256_0742_2021_7_4_214_225
crossref_primary_10_1111_radm_12579
crossref_primary_10_30518_jav_1585397
crossref_primary_10_1108_INMR_12_2020_0176
crossref_primary_10_21728_p2p_2023v9nesp_p228_248
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_023_03261_6
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Sheila Serafim Da Silva, Paulo Roberto Feldmann, Renata Giovinazzo Spers and Martha Delphino Bambini. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: Sheila Serafim Da Silva, Paulo Roberto Feldmann, Renata Giovinazzo Spers and Martha Delphino Bambini. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID OT2
AAYXX
CITATION
0U~
1-H
7WY
7WZ
7X5
7XB
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
BEZIV
CCPQU
CLZPN
DWQXO
F~G
GNUQQ
GUQSH
K6~
L.-
L.0
M0C
M2O
MBDVC
PADUT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQBIZ
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PYYUZ
Q9U
DOI 10.1108/INMR-05-2018-0024
DatabaseName EconStor
CrossRef
Global News & ABI/Inform Professional
Trade PRO
ProQuest ABI/INFORM Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)
Entrepreneurship Database
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials - QC
ProQuest Central
Business Premium Collection
ProQuest One
Latin America & Iberia Database
ProQuest Central Korea
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Business Collection
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ABI/INFORM Professional Standard
ABI/INFORM Global
Research Library
Research Library (Corporate)
Research Library China
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ABI/INFORM Collection China
ProQuest Central Basic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest One Business
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
Trade PRO
ProQuest Central China
ABI/INFORM Complete
ProQuest Central
Global News & ABI/Inform Professional
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ABI/INFORM Professional Standard
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (New)
Research Library China
ProQuest Entrepreneurship
Business Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ABI/INFORM China
ProQuest Business Collection
Latin America & Iberian Database
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Business
EISSN 2515-8961
EndPage 390
ExternalDocumentID 10_1108_INMR_05_2018_0024
231617
GeographicLocations Brazil
United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
– name: Brazil
GroupedDBID 7WY
AAFWJ
AAGBP
ABUWG
ADBBV
AFKRA
AFMMW
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AUCOK
AZQEC
BCNDV
BENPR
BEZIV
CCPQU
CLZPN
DWQXO
EBS
EJD
GEI
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GUQSH
H13
M0C
M2O
M~E
OK1
OT2
PADUT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQBIZ
PUEGO
XDTOA
AAYXX
CITATION
0U~
1-H
7X5
7XB
K6~
L.-
L.0
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-2d2281dfdd6e1e99750b655ac3ad65874e3a22a9f640d2daf8ce6ff5d2b0568e3
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 2515-8961
IngestDate Mon Jun 30 12:08:12 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:45 EDT 2025
Wed Jul 30 23:59:41 EDT 2025
Fri Aug 29 12:19:22 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c352t-2d2281dfdd6e1e99750b655ac3ad65874e3a22a9f640d2daf8ce6ff5d2b0568e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2506875433?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PQID 2506875433
PQPubID 466373
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_2506875433
crossref_primary_10_1108_INMR_05_2018_0024
crossref_citationtrail_10_1108_INMR_05_2018_0024
econis_econstor_231617
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-11-20
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-11-20
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-11-20
  day: 20
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Bingley
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Bingley
– name: São Paulo
PublicationTitle Innovation & management review
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Emerald
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Emerald
– name: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
References (key2025032114193439600_ref023) 1974
(key2025032114193439600_ref029) 2017
Embrapa. (key2025032114193439600_ref008) 2016
(key2025032114193439600_ref022) 1962
(key2025032114193439600_ref014) 2017
(key2025032114193439600_ref003) 2000
(key2025032114193439600_ref001) 2001
key2025032114193439600_ref004
(key2025032114193439600_ref015) 2006
(key2025032114193439600_ref002) 2014
(key2025032114193439600_ref011) 2002
(key2025032114193439600_ref005) 2009
key2025032114193439600_ref019
OECD - Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (key2025032114193439600_ref021) 2015
(key2025032114193439600_ref018) 1997
Embrapa. (key2025032114193439600_ref007) 2014
(key2025032114193439600_ref028) 2011
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (key2025032114193439600_ref016) 2006
(key2025032114193439600_ref012) 1994
(key2025032114193439600_ref013) 2012
(key2025032114193439600_ref009) 1994
(key2025032114193439600_ref027) 2002
(key2025032114193439600_ref006) 2011
(key2025032114193439600_ref010) 1967
(key2025032114193439600_ref025) 2019
(key2025032114193439600_ref020) 2014
(key2025032114193439600_ref026) 1966
(key2025032114193439600_ref017) 2003
(key2025032114193439600_ref024) 1991
References_xml – volume-title: Métodos de comunicação e participação nas atividades de extensão rural
  year: 2011
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref028
– ident: key2025032114193439600_ref004
– volume-title: Marco referencial: Fundamentos sobre a interação entre a embrapa e a sociedade: Transferência de tecnologia, intercâmbio e construção de conhecimento
  year: 2014
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref007
– start-page: 244
  volume-title: Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: um manual prático
  year: 2002
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref011
– start-page: 285
  year: 2017
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref014
  article-title: Challenges in technology transfer: an actor perspective in a quadruple helix environment
  publication-title: The Journal of Technology Transfer
– start-page: 43
  year: 2002
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref027
  article-title: Communication approach for agricultural technology transfer in various agro-ecosystem zones: A case study in South Sumatra province
  publication-title: Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science
– start-page: 385
  volume-title: La comunicación de inovaciones
  year: 1974
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref023
– start-page: 21
  volume-title: Anais do Seminar on Agricultural Technology and Training
  year: 2001
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref001
  article-title: Related issues to promote farmer participation in agricultural technology transfer
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Censo agropecuário: agricultura familiar 2006
  year: 2006
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref016
– volume-title: Building the Entrepreneurial state
  year: 2014
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref020
– volume-title: Diffusion of innovations
  year: 1962
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref022
– start-page: 98
  year: 1991
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref024
  article-title: Difusão de tecnologia e extensão rural na Embrapa: Reflexões conceituais e práticas
  publication-title: Cadernos de Ciência e Tecnologia, Brasília
– start-page: 715
  year: 2003
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref017
  article-title: Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation
  publication-title: Research Policy
– volume-title: Global shift: the internationalization of economic activity
  year: 2011
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref006
– volume-title: The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies
  year: 1994
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref012
– start-page: 182
  year: 2014
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref002
  article-title: Controversies about the process of technology transfer from public research institutions in Brazil: The case of the Brazilian agricultural research corporation – Embrapa
  publication-title: Journal Technology Management of Innovation
– volume-title: Comunicação Para o desenvolvimento (editores)
  year: 2012
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref013
– ident: key2025032114193439600_ref019
– start-page: 35
  year: 1997
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref018
  article-title: Expanding the content base of technology education: Technology transfer as a topic of study
  publication-title: Journal of Technology Education
– volume-title: Case study research and applications
  year: 2017
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref029
– start-page: 29
  year: 2009
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref005
  article-title: Transferência e validação de tecnologias agropecuárias a partir de instituições de pesquisa
  publication-title: Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente
– start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref021
  article-title: Agricultural plants 2015-2024
– start-page: 102
  year: 2019
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref025
  article-title: Technology transfer and human capital in the industrial 4.0 scenario: A theoretical study
  publication-title: Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
– start-page: 409
  year: 1994
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref009
  article-title: Learning from six reasons why the farmers not adopt innovations intended to improve sustainability of upland agriculture
  publication-title: Agricultural Systems
– volume-title: Objects proof of delivery
  year: 2016
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref008
– start-page: 627
  year: 2000
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref003
  article-title: Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory
  publication-title: Research Policy
– start-page: 371
  year: 1966
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref026
  article-title: The structure of thinking in technology
  publication-title: Technology and Culture
– volume-title: The new industrial state
  year: 1967
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref010
– start-page: 715
  year: 2006
  ident: key2025032114193439600_ref015
  article-title: Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation
  publication-title: Research Policy
SSID ssj0002769464
Score 2.1383283
Snippet Purpose - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), owned by the Brazilian Government, is one of...
PurposeEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), owned by the Brazilian Government, is one of the...
SourceID proquest
crossref
econis
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 375
SubjectTerms Agricultural research
Brazilian agriculture
Farmers
Food
Innovation
Innovations
Knowledge
Productivity
Technology transfer
Title Analysis of the process of technology transfer in public research institutions: The Embrapa agrobiology case
URI https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/231617
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2506875433
Volume 16
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LSwMxEA7aingRX8VqLTl4Eha32d00OYlKSxVapFjoLaR5YEHa2q7_35ndbEWEnpZ9BibZmW8e-YaQW6m5TfhMRyZNEmxhZiMNqDbyUhqOpE-C4wbn4YgPJunrNJuGgNsmlFVWOrFQ1HZpMEZ-D6aaA7aGLz6sviLsGoXZ1dBCY5_UQQULcL7qT73R23gbZWFdLlOehnQmtrx5GQ3HmP0FwycitFB_DNIBeqHzzT_FXFib_gk5DjCRPpbzekr23OKMHFZV6udkVJGJ0KWngOHoqiz4L0630XKaF7DUrel8QUtCaxrYfT7gUlkmgOvugkz6vffnQRRaI0QGEFMeMcsYIE1vLXcdJyXY_RnPMm0SbQFTdFOXaMa09DyNLbPaC-O495llM0A8wiUNUlssF-6SUK87QmrrrEdeHuGkQFEnUnS6NjYma5K4ko8ygTcc21d8qsJ_iIVCkao4UyhShSJtkrvtK6uSNGPXw41S6AoPWBKqAHMCsGqSVjUJKvxYG_W7DK52374mRzCExG2DLG6RWr7-djeAH_JZOyySduF__wB4ecU1
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bSxtBFD7YKNUXsbWh0WjnoX0RFjezu5OZhyK2RpJqFhEF36aTuaBQkmgi4p_yN_acvURE8M2nZW-zcObsfN85cy4A35URLhEjE9k0SaiFmYsMstooKGUFFX2SghKch7noX6Z_rrKrJXiqc2EorLJeE4uF2k0s-cj3EaoFcmsc8WB6G1HXKNpdrVtolGpx4h8f0GSb_Rwc4fz-4Py4d_G7H1VdBSKLZGMeccc5krTgnPAdrxRC5khkmbGJcQjH3dQnhnOjgkhjx50J0noRQub4CMmC9AmO-wGW0wRNmQYs_-rlZ-cLrw7vCpWKtNo-pRY7g3x4TrvNCLQyIkR8AYArZPXezF4BQYFuxxuwXtFSdljq0SdY8uPP8LGOit-EvC5ewiaBIWdk0zLBoDhdeOfZvKDB_o7djFlZQJtV1YSu8VIZlkB6_gUu30VoTWiMJ2P_FVgwHamM8y5QHSDplaSpTZTsdF1sbdaCuJaPtlWdcmqX8U8X9kosNYlUx5kmkWoSaQv2Fq9MyyIdbz3cLIWu6UAhqBo5LhK5FrTrSdDVjzzTz2q39fbtb7Davxie6tNBfrINa_g5RSmLPG5DY35373eQu8xHu5XCMPj73jr6H-VkAiI
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LixNBEC7WrAQvoqvBrFH7sF6EIZOemU73QUTdhI1rhhAM5NZ2-oEBSbJJlsW_5q-zah4REXLb0zCvHqiu6e-r6noAXCgjXCIWJrJpklALMxcZZLVRUMoKKvokBSU4j3NxNUu_zLP5Cfyuc2EorLJeE4uF2q0t-ci7CNUCuTWO2A1VWMTkcvhhcxNRBynaaa3baZQqcu1_3aH5tns_usS5fsv5cPDt81VUdRiILBKPfcQd50jYgnPC97xSCJ8LkWXGJsYhNPdTnxjOjQoijR13JkjrRQiZ4wskDtInOO4DOO2jVRQ34PTTIJ9MDx4e3hcqFWm1lUrtdkb5eEo7zwi6MiJ0_AcMH5IFvNz9BwoF0g2fwOOKorKPpU49hRO_OoNmHSH_DPK6kAlbB4b8kW3KZIPi9OCpZ_uCEvstW65YWUybVZWFfuClMkSBdP45zO5FaC1orNYr_wJYMD2pjPMuUE0g6ZWkaU6U7PVdbG3WhriWj7ZVzXJqnfFTF7ZLLDWJVMeZJpFqEmkb3h1e2ZQFO4493CqFrulA4aga-S6SujZ06knQ1U-9039V8Pz47TfQRN3UX0f59Ut4hF9TlL3I4w409ttb_wppzH7xutIXBt_vW0X_AJ6PBlc
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis+of+the+process+of+technology+transfer+in+public+research+institutions&rft.jtitle=Innovation+%26+management+review&rft.au=Sheila+Serafim+Da+Silva&rft.au=Feldmann%2C+Paulo+Roberto&rft.au=Renata+Giovinazzo+Spers&rft.au=Bambini%2C+Martha+Delphino&rft.date=2019-11-20&rft.pub=Emerald+Group+Publishing+Limited&rft.eissn=2515-8961&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108%2FINMR-05-2018-0024&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2515-8961&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2515-8961&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2515-8961&client=summon