Analysis of the process of technology transfer in public research institutions: The Embrapa agrobiology case
Purpose - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), owned by the Brazilian Government, is one of the most efficient agencies for promoting sustainable tropical agriculture in the world. However, although information is available, farmers...
Saved in:
Published in | Innovation & management review Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 375 - 390 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bingley
Emerald
20.11.2019
Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), owned by the Brazilian Government, is one of the most efficient agencies for promoting sustainable tropical agriculture in the world. However, although information is available, farmers do not always put the technologies and knowledge into practice. There is a large difference between the average productivity of farmers and crop or herd potential. Thus, this paper aims to describe and analyze the process of technology transfer of the Embrapa Agrobiology Unit. Design/methodology/approach The study reviewed the classical and diffusionist models of technology transfer (TT) in Brazilian agriculture and the role of the government in innovation. This was based on documentary research and structured interviews with four employees, supported by a structured roadmap composed of four categories for analysis: the role of TT; the organizational structure of the area; the TT strategies; and the ways of delivery, methods and tools of TT. By a qualitative approach, the results were treated through content analysis. Findings The results indicated that the area of TT at Embrapa went through a recent restructuring, which included the interchange and collective construction of knowledge (ICC) in its TT process, to turn entrepreneurship into reality. The company is dedicated to bringing knowledge to the most important people: farmers. This has been done through a participatory TT model, which has involved multiplier agents from the research stage to the transfer stage. Research limitations/implications Some limitations were found, among them, the fact that only internal members of Embrapa were interviewed, limiting the view of the TTICC staff and without knowing the multiplier agents' opinion and other actors involved in the process. In addition, it is a qualitative research that is subject to the interpretation of the researcher. Practical implications This study contributed to reflections about the TT process and how it can be used by different actors, along with the role of the State in innovation. Social implications In addition to contributing to the development of products, processes and technologies for the economic, social and environmental development of Brazil, Embrapa has been outstanding in generating knowledge for the advancement of science. Its results have had impacts not only nationally but also worldwide. Embrapa has played a key role in Brazilian agriculture as well as in livestock, mainly, in supporting governmental projects and in the implementation of public policies. Originality/value The aim of this study was achieved, as there was a possibility of describing and analyzing the technology transfer process at Embrapa Agrobiology Unit, located in the city of Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro. It is concluded that Embrapa has been committed to involving the farmer in the process of interchange, collective construction of knowledge and technology transfer. The farmer has become the focus of this process, reducing the development of "shelf" researches and increasing the participation of the farmer or of the multiplier agent. The importance of studying and knowing the process of technology and knowledge transfer to the public of interest should be highlighted, and especially the reasons why this technology or knowledge are often not adopted by the public. It was possible to identify that Embrapa has noticed the difficulties of farmers and realized that the best way the best way of transforming technological solutions and knowledge into innovation is by involving the farmer in the process of construction and of transfer. Thus, the farmer gives greater credibility to the technology or generated knowledge because this is something that he himself helped build. In the sphere of contemporary institutional knowledge management, Embrapa has had as its main point of departure the demand and the needs of society. For this, it has created means to ensure the participation of different actors because they signal the construction of technological solutions and of innovation and they are the ones who know the real situation. However, this is a recent progress within Embrapa that has evolved and generated results. Thus, research, science and technology institutions must go beyond technology transfer and must ensure the involvement, participation and interaction of the public of interest to promote significant change, social, economic and environmental development and transformation. Embrapa observed this from the referential framework that included technology transfer, interchange and the collective construction of knowledge. |
---|---|
AbstractList | PurposeEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), owned by the Brazilian Government, is one of the most efficient agencies for promoting sustainable tropical agriculture in the world. However, although information is available, farmers do not always put the technologies and knowledge into practice. There is a large difference between the average productivity of farmers and crop or herd potential. Thus, this paper aims to describe and analyze the process of technology transfer of the Embrapa Agrobiology Unit.Design/methodology/approachThe study reviewed the classical and diffusionist models of technology transfer (TT) in Brazilian agriculture and the role of the government in innovation. This was based on documentary research and structured interviews with four employees, supported by a structured roadmap composed of four categories for analysis: the role of TT; the organizational structure of the area; the TT strategies; and the ways of delivery, methods and tools of TT. By a qualitative approach, the results were treated through content analysis.FindingsThe results indicated that the area of TT at Embrapa went through a recent restructuring, which included the interchange and collective construction of knowledge (ICC) in its TT process, to turn entrepreneurship into reality. The company is dedicated to bringing knowledge to the most important people: farmers. This has been done through a participatory TT model, which has involved multiplier agents from the research stage to the transfer stage.Research limitations/implicationsSome limitations were found, among them, the fact that only internal members of Embrapa were interviewed, limiting the view of the TTICC staff and without knowing the multiplier agents’ opinion and other actors involved in the process. In addition, it is a qualitative research that is subject to the interpretation of the researcher.Practical implicationsThis study contributed to reflections about the TT process and how it can be used by different actors, along with the role of the State in innovation.Social implicationsIn addition to contributing to the development of products, processes and technologies for the economic, social and environmental development of Brazil, Embrapa has been outstanding in generating knowledge for the advancement of science. Its results have had impacts not only nationally but also worldwide. Embrapa has played a key role in Brazilian agriculture as well as in livestock, mainly, in supporting governmental projects and in the implementation of public policies.Originality/valueThe aim of this study was achieved, as there was a possibility of describing and analyzing the technology transfer process at Embrapa Agrobiology Unit, located in the city of Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro. It is concluded that Embrapa has been committed to involving the farmer in the process of interchange, collective construction of knowledge and technology transfer. The farmer has become the focus of this process, reducing the development of “shelf” researches and increasing the participation of the farmer or of the multiplier agent. The importance of studying and knowing the process of technology and knowledge transfer to the public of interest should be highlighted, and especially the reasons why this technology or knowledge are often not adopted by the public. It was possible to identify that Embrapa has noticed the difficulties of farmers and realized that the best way the best way of transforming technological solutions and knowledge into innovation is by involving the farmer in the process of construction and of transfer. Thus, the farmer gives greater credibility to the technology or generated knowledge because this is something that he himself helped build. In the sphere of contemporary institutional knowledge management, Embrapa has had as its main point of departure the demand and the needs of society. For this, it has created means to ensure the participation of different actors because they signal the construction of technological solutions and of innovation and they are the ones who know the real situation. However, this is a recent progress within Embrapa that has evolved and generated results. Thus, research, science and technology institutions must go beyond technology transfer and must ensure the involvement, participation and interaction of the public of interest to promote significant change, social, economic and environmental development and transformation. Embrapa observed this from the referential framework that included technology transfer, interchange and the collective construction of knowledge. Purpose - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), owned by the Brazilian Government, is one of the most efficient agencies for promoting sustainable tropical agriculture in the world. However, although information is available, farmers do not always put the technologies and knowledge into practice. There is a large difference between the average productivity of farmers and crop or herd potential. Thus, this paper aims to describe and analyze the process of technology transfer of the Embrapa Agrobiology Unit. Design/methodology/approach The study reviewed the classical and diffusionist models of technology transfer (TT) in Brazilian agriculture and the role of the government in innovation. This was based on documentary research and structured interviews with four employees, supported by a structured roadmap composed of four categories for analysis: the role of TT; the organizational structure of the area; the TT strategies; and the ways of delivery, methods and tools of TT. By a qualitative approach, the results were treated through content analysis. Findings The results indicated that the area of TT at Embrapa went through a recent restructuring, which included the interchange and collective construction of knowledge (ICC) in its TT process, to turn entrepreneurship into reality. The company is dedicated to bringing knowledge to the most important people: farmers. This has been done through a participatory TT model, which has involved multiplier agents from the research stage to the transfer stage. Research limitations/implications Some limitations were found, among them, the fact that only internal members of Embrapa were interviewed, limiting the view of the TTICC staff and without knowing the multiplier agents' opinion and other actors involved in the process. In addition, it is a qualitative research that is subject to the interpretation of the researcher. Practical implications This study contributed to reflections about the TT process and how it can be used by different actors, along with the role of the State in innovation. Social implications In addition to contributing to the development of products, processes and technologies for the economic, social and environmental development of Brazil, Embrapa has been outstanding in generating knowledge for the advancement of science. Its results have had impacts not only nationally but also worldwide. Embrapa has played a key role in Brazilian agriculture as well as in livestock, mainly, in supporting governmental projects and in the implementation of public policies. Originality/value The aim of this study was achieved, as there was a possibility of describing and analyzing the technology transfer process at Embrapa Agrobiology Unit, located in the city of Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro. It is concluded that Embrapa has been committed to involving the farmer in the process of interchange, collective construction of knowledge and technology transfer. The farmer has become the focus of this process, reducing the development of "shelf" researches and increasing the participation of the farmer or of the multiplier agent. The importance of studying and knowing the process of technology and knowledge transfer to the public of interest should be highlighted, and especially the reasons why this technology or knowledge are often not adopted by the public. It was possible to identify that Embrapa has noticed the difficulties of farmers and realized that the best way the best way of transforming technological solutions and knowledge into innovation is by involving the farmer in the process of construction and of transfer. Thus, the farmer gives greater credibility to the technology or generated knowledge because this is something that he himself helped build. In the sphere of contemporary institutional knowledge management, Embrapa has had as its main point of departure the demand and the needs of society. For this, it has created means to ensure the participation of different actors because they signal the construction of technological solutions and of innovation and they are the ones who know the real situation. However, this is a recent progress within Embrapa that has evolved and generated results. Thus, research, science and technology institutions must go beyond technology transfer and must ensure the involvement, participation and interaction of the public of interest to promote significant change, social, economic and environmental development and transformation. Embrapa observed this from the referential framework that included technology transfer, interchange and the collective construction of knowledge. |
Author | da Silva, Sheila Serafim Feldmann, Paulo Roberto Bambini, Martha Delphino Spers, Renata Giovinazzo |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sheila Serafim surname: da Silva fullname: da Silva, Sheila Serafim – sequence: 2 givenname: Paulo Roberto surname: Feldmann fullname: Feldmann, Paulo Roberto – sequence: 3 givenname: Renata Giovinazzo surname: Spers fullname: Spers, Renata Giovinazzo – sequence: 4 givenname: Martha Delphino surname: Bambini fullname: Bambini, Martha Delphino |
BookMark | eNp9kEtLxDAUhYOMoI7-ABdCwHU1SZu0dTeIjwEfILoOaXozE-k0Y25mMf_elroQF67ug3MOnO-EzPrQAyHnnF1xzqrr5cvzW8ZkJhivMsZEcUCOheQyq2rFZ7_2I3KG-MkGSanqQhXHpFv0ptujRxocTWug2xgs4HSCXfehC6s9TdH06CBS39Ptrum8pREQTLTr4YXJp13yoccb-j5k3G2aaLaGmlUMjZ8SrEE4JYfOdAhnP3NOPu7v3m8fs6fXh-Xt4imzuRQpE60QFW9d2yrgUNelZI2S0tjctEpWZQG5EcLUThWsFa1xlQXlnGxFw6SqIJ-Tyyl3KPO1A0z6M-ziUBS1kExVpSzyfFDxSWVjQIzg9Db6jYl7zZkeueqRq2ZSj1z1yHXwlH881iczVh8I-e5f58XkBBt6j3ocmELUIueKl_k3lSCKcg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10961_024_10175_6 crossref_primary_10_30525_2256_0742_2021_7_4_214_225 crossref_primary_10_1111_radm_12579 crossref_primary_10_30518_jav_1585397 crossref_primary_10_1108_INMR_12_2020_0176 crossref_primary_10_21728_p2p_2023v9nesp_p228_248 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_023_03261_6 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Sheila Serafim Da Silva, Paulo Roberto Feldmann, Renata Giovinazzo Spers and Martha Delphino Bambini. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Sheila Serafim Da Silva, Paulo Roberto Feldmann, Renata Giovinazzo Spers and Martha Delphino Bambini. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | OT2 AAYXX CITATION 0U~ 1-H 7WY 7WZ 7X5 7XB ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR BEZIV CCPQU CLZPN DWQXO F~G GNUQQ GUQSH K6~ L.- L.0 M0C M2O MBDVC PADUT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQBIZ PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PYYUZ Q9U |
DOI | 10.1108/INMR-05-2018-0024 |
DatabaseName | EconStor CrossRef Global News & ABI/Inform Professional Trade PRO ProQuest ABI/INFORM Collection ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only) Entrepreneurship Database ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials - QC ProQuest Central Business Premium Collection ProQuest One Latin America & Iberia Database ProQuest Central Korea ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Business Collection ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ABI/INFORM Professional Standard ABI/INFORM Global Research Library Research Library (Corporate) Research Library China ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ABI/INFORM Collection China ProQuest Central Basic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest One Business Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College Trade PRO ProQuest Central China ABI/INFORM Complete ProQuest Central Global News & ABI/Inform Professional ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ABI/INFORM Professional Standard ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (New) Research Library China ProQuest Entrepreneurship Business Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ABI/INFORM China ProQuest Business Collection Latin America & Iberian Database ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Business |
EISSN | 2515-8961 |
EndPage | 390 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1108_INMR_05_2018_0024 231617 |
GeographicLocations | Brazil United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US – name: Brazil |
GroupedDBID | 7WY AAFWJ AAGBP ABUWG ADBBV AFKRA AFMMW AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AUCOK AZQEC BCNDV BENPR BEZIV CCPQU CLZPN DWQXO EBS EJD GEI GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GUQSH H13 M0C M2O M~E OK1 OT2 PADUT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQBIZ PUEGO XDTOA AAYXX CITATION 0U~ 1-H 7X5 7XB K6~ L.- L.0 MBDVC PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-2d2281dfdd6e1e99750b655ac3ad65874e3a22a9f640d2daf8ce6ff5d2b0568e3 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 2515-8961 |
IngestDate | Mon Jun 30 12:08:12 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:45 EDT 2025 Wed Jul 30 23:59:41 EDT 2025 Fri Aug 29 12:19:22 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
License | https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c352t-2d2281dfdd6e1e99750b655ac3ad65874e3a22a9f640d2daf8ce6ff5d2b0568e3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2506875433?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PQID | 2506875433 |
PQPubID | 466373 |
PageCount | 16 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2506875433 crossref_primary_10_1108_INMR_05_2018_0024 crossref_citationtrail_10_1108_INMR_05_2018_0024 econis_econstor_231617 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-11-20 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-11-20 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2019 text: 2019-11-20 day: 20 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Bingley |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Bingley – name: São Paulo |
PublicationTitle | Innovation & management review |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | Emerald Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
Publisher_xml | – name: Emerald – name: Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
References | (key2025032114193439600_ref023) 1974 (key2025032114193439600_ref029) 2017 Embrapa. (key2025032114193439600_ref008) 2016 (key2025032114193439600_ref022) 1962 (key2025032114193439600_ref014) 2017 (key2025032114193439600_ref003) 2000 (key2025032114193439600_ref001) 2001 key2025032114193439600_ref004 (key2025032114193439600_ref015) 2006 (key2025032114193439600_ref002) 2014 (key2025032114193439600_ref011) 2002 (key2025032114193439600_ref005) 2009 key2025032114193439600_ref019 OECD - Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (key2025032114193439600_ref021) 2015 (key2025032114193439600_ref018) 1997 Embrapa. (key2025032114193439600_ref007) 2014 (key2025032114193439600_ref028) 2011 IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (key2025032114193439600_ref016) 2006 (key2025032114193439600_ref012) 1994 (key2025032114193439600_ref013) 2012 (key2025032114193439600_ref009) 1994 (key2025032114193439600_ref027) 2002 (key2025032114193439600_ref006) 2011 (key2025032114193439600_ref010) 1967 (key2025032114193439600_ref025) 2019 (key2025032114193439600_ref020) 2014 (key2025032114193439600_ref026) 1966 (key2025032114193439600_ref017) 2003 (key2025032114193439600_ref024) 1991 |
References_xml | – volume-title: Métodos de comunicação e participação nas atividades de extensão rural year: 2011 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref028 – ident: key2025032114193439600_ref004 – volume-title: Marco referencial: Fundamentos sobre a interação entre a embrapa e a sociedade: Transferência de tecnologia, intercâmbio e construção de conhecimento year: 2014 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref007 – start-page: 244 volume-title: Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: um manual prático year: 2002 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref011 – start-page: 285 year: 2017 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref014 article-title: Challenges in technology transfer: an actor perspective in a quadruple helix environment publication-title: The Journal of Technology Transfer – start-page: 43 year: 2002 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref027 article-title: Communication approach for agricultural technology transfer in various agro-ecosystem zones: A case study in South Sumatra province publication-title: Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science – start-page: 385 volume-title: La comunicación de inovaciones year: 1974 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref023 – start-page: 21 volume-title: Anais do Seminar on Agricultural Technology and Training year: 2001 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref001 article-title: Related issues to promote farmer participation in agricultural technology transfer – start-page: 1 volume-title: Censo agropecuário: agricultura familiar 2006 year: 2006 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref016 – volume-title: Building the Entrepreneurial state year: 2014 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref020 – volume-title: Diffusion of innovations year: 1962 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref022 – start-page: 98 year: 1991 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref024 article-title: Difusão de tecnologia e extensão rural na Embrapa: Reflexões conceituais e práticas publication-title: Cadernos de Ciência e Tecnologia, Brasília – start-page: 715 year: 2003 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref017 article-title: Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation publication-title: Research Policy – volume-title: Global shift: the internationalization of economic activity year: 2011 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref006 – volume-title: The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies year: 1994 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref012 – start-page: 182 year: 2014 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref002 article-title: Controversies about the process of technology transfer from public research institutions in Brazil: The case of the Brazilian agricultural research corporation – Embrapa publication-title: Journal Technology Management of Innovation – volume-title: Comunicação Para o desenvolvimento (editores) year: 2012 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref013 – ident: key2025032114193439600_ref019 – start-page: 35 year: 1997 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref018 article-title: Expanding the content base of technology education: Technology transfer as a topic of study publication-title: Journal of Technology Education – volume-title: Case study research and applications year: 2017 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref029 – start-page: 29 year: 2009 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref005 article-title: Transferência e validação de tecnologias agropecuárias a partir de instituições de pesquisa publication-title: Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente – start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref021 article-title: Agricultural plants 2015-2024 – start-page: 102 year: 2019 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref025 article-title: Technology transfer and human capital in the industrial 4.0 scenario: A theoretical study publication-title: Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies – start-page: 409 year: 1994 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref009 article-title: Learning from six reasons why the farmers not adopt innovations intended to improve sustainability of upland agriculture publication-title: Agricultural Systems – volume-title: Objects proof of delivery year: 2016 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref008 – start-page: 627 year: 2000 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref003 article-title: Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory publication-title: Research Policy – start-page: 371 year: 1966 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref026 article-title: The structure of thinking in technology publication-title: Technology and Culture – volume-title: The new industrial state year: 1967 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref010 – start-page: 715 year: 2006 ident: key2025032114193439600_ref015 article-title: Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation publication-title: Research Policy |
SSID | ssj0002769464 |
Score | 2.1383283 |
Snippet | Purpose - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), owned by the Brazilian Government, is one of... PurposeEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), owned by the Brazilian Government, is one of the... |
SourceID | proquest crossref econis |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 375 |
SubjectTerms | Agricultural research Brazilian agriculture Farmers Food Innovation Innovations Knowledge Productivity Technology transfer |
Title | Analysis of the process of technology transfer in public research institutions: The Embrapa agrobiology case |
URI | https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/231617 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2506875433 |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LSwMxEA7aingRX8VqLTl4Eha32d00OYlKSxVapFjoLaR5YEHa2q7_35ndbEWEnpZ9BibZmW8e-YaQW6m5TfhMRyZNEmxhZiMNqDbyUhqOpE-C4wbn4YgPJunrNJuGgNsmlFVWOrFQ1HZpMEZ-D6aaA7aGLz6sviLsGoXZ1dBCY5_UQQULcL7qT73R23gbZWFdLlOehnQmtrx5GQ3HmP0FwycitFB_DNIBeqHzzT_FXFib_gk5DjCRPpbzekr23OKMHFZV6udkVJGJ0KWngOHoqiz4L0630XKaF7DUrel8QUtCaxrYfT7gUlkmgOvugkz6vffnQRRaI0QGEFMeMcsYIE1vLXcdJyXY_RnPMm0SbQFTdFOXaMa09DyNLbPaC-O495llM0A8wiUNUlssF-6SUK87QmrrrEdeHuGkQFEnUnS6NjYma5K4ko8ygTcc21d8qsJ_iIVCkao4UyhShSJtkrvtK6uSNGPXw41S6AoPWBKqAHMCsGqSVjUJKvxYG_W7DK52374mRzCExG2DLG6RWr7-djeAH_JZOyySduF__wB4ecU1 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bSxtBFD7YKNUXsbWh0WjnoX0RFjezu5OZhyK2RpJqFhEF36aTuaBQkmgi4p_yN_acvURE8M2nZW-zcObsfN85cy4A35URLhEjE9k0SaiFmYsMstooKGUFFX2SghKch7noX6Z_rrKrJXiqc2EorLJeE4uF2k0s-cj3EaoFcmsc8WB6G1HXKNpdrVtolGpx4h8f0GSb_Rwc4fz-4Py4d_G7H1VdBSKLZGMeccc5krTgnPAdrxRC5khkmbGJcQjH3dQnhnOjgkhjx50J0noRQub4CMmC9AmO-wGW0wRNmQYs_-rlZ-cLrw7vCpWKtNo-pRY7g3x4TrvNCLQyIkR8AYArZPXezF4BQYFuxxuwXtFSdljq0SdY8uPP8LGOit-EvC5ewiaBIWdk0zLBoDhdeOfZvKDB_o7djFlZQJtV1YSu8VIZlkB6_gUu30VoTWiMJ2P_FVgwHamM8y5QHSDplaSpTZTsdF1sbdaCuJaPtlWdcmqX8U8X9kosNYlUx5kmkWoSaQv2Fq9MyyIdbz3cLIWu6UAhqBo5LhK5FrTrSdDVjzzTz2q39fbtb7Davxie6tNBfrINa_g5RSmLPG5DY35373eQu8xHu5XCMPj73jr6H-VkAiI |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LixNBEC7WrAQvoqvBrFH7sF6EIZOemU73QUTdhI1rhhAM5NZ2-oEBSbJJlsW_5q-zah4REXLb0zCvHqiu6e-r6noAXCgjXCIWJrJpklALMxcZZLVRUMoKKvokBSU4j3NxNUu_zLP5Cfyuc2EorLJeE4uF2q0t-ci7CNUCuTWO2A1VWMTkcvhhcxNRBynaaa3baZQqcu1_3aH5tns_usS5fsv5cPDt81VUdRiILBKPfcQd50jYgnPC97xSCJ8LkWXGJsYhNPdTnxjOjQoijR13JkjrRQiZ4wskDtInOO4DOO2jVRQ34PTTIJ9MDx4e3hcqFWm1lUrtdkb5eEo7zwi6MiJ0_AcMH5IFvNz9BwoF0g2fwOOKorKPpU49hRO_OoNmHSH_DPK6kAlbB4b8kW3KZIPi9OCpZ_uCEvstW65YWUybVZWFfuClMkSBdP45zO5FaC1orNYr_wJYMD2pjPMuUE0g6ZWkaU6U7PVdbG3WhriWj7ZVzXJqnfFTF7ZLLDWJVMeZJpFqEmkb3h1e2ZQFO4493CqFrulA4aga-S6SujZ06knQ1U-9039V8Pz47TfQRN3UX0f59Ut4hF9TlL3I4w409ttb_wppzH7xutIXBt_vW0X_AJ6PBlc |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis+of+the+process+of+technology+transfer+in+public+research+institutions&rft.jtitle=Innovation+%26+management+review&rft.au=Sheila+Serafim+Da+Silva&rft.au=Feldmann%2C+Paulo+Roberto&rft.au=Renata+Giovinazzo+Spers&rft.au=Bambini%2C+Martha+Delphino&rft.date=2019-11-20&rft.pub=Emerald+Group+Publishing+Limited&rft.eissn=2515-8961&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108%2FINMR-05-2018-0024&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2515-8961&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2515-8961&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2515-8961&client=summon |